The Carol Woods Coverup: I.P.T. [Investigatory Powers Tribunal] refuse to respond to the installation of the illegal tracking device in Carol Wood’s car by Lancs. police – CAR VANDALISED: POLICE DO NOTHING – 23 Dec. 17 + archive

After sending the latest complaint by way of 20 pages of printed notes [pic above] by recorded delivery to the IPT [Investigatory Powers Tribunal] regarding the illegal installing of a GPS device in Carol Wood’s car by Lancs. police, and then phoning them weeks later [as I’d had no acknowledgement to the 20 pages] and finding out they “hadn’t received” these notes, despite the recorded delivery being signed for at their correct location [see the signed receipt below], then being told in that same call to send them again with their official forms, and then waiting months for some kind of progress regarding the illegal GPS tracking device I received the letter below which tells that all was a waste of time, and money. This complete ignoring of a complaint by the IPT regarding Lancs. police’s clear breach the Data Protection Act [and European Convention of Human Rights Article 8, which concerns a citizen’s privacy, etc. – see below] surely shows the lawlessness rampant throughout the chronic and completely unacceptable and hostile targeting of Carol Woods by a police force – Lancs. police force – and their cronies in high places, including the Lancs. county council, Royal Mail and other household names who continue to break the law on an almost daily basis!! So, the IPT don’t want to know, with at least 3 letters from the Home Office telling me to go to the IPT, and the IPCC have already said they’ed be sending anything sent to them regarding Lancs. police back to Lancs. police, it all proves a complete and utter waste of time, and Lancs. police have carte blanche to break the laws exactly how they like with no one in the UK government calling them to account. Carol Woods is no “jihadi terrorist” or a member of any Mafia – she is a completely harmless old age pensioner who is a retired top social worker and Child Protection Officer  and Probation Officer and who spent her entire working career [for Lancs. county council, amongst others] in service to others – especially vulnerable children! Lancs. police’s [and others] problem is that Carol blew the whistle on rampant corruption  – see Carol’s original w’blowing 2006 blog post “York LGO Blog re Lancashire Co. Council”   http://criticalreader2006.blogspot.ae/ which explains why the abhorrent and complex targeting began – targeting that includes an infinite number of serious crimes enacted by officials, plus a] organised gangstalking by recruited neighbours she’s forced to endure daily [many of these recruited neighbours being unemployed thugs who are rewarded for their crimes out of the public purse – everything organised – it is alleged – by Lancs. police!], b] infinite DWP / Social Security frauds, c] infinite ID frauds using Carol’s credentials [Carol’s ID being got my R. Mail fraudulent deliveries of her mail to adjoining criminal neighbours who then use the ID gleaned for criminal purposes], and so much more she’s forced to experience daily – and has been forced to experience for years – ALL PAID FOR BY THE TAXPAYER – see  “Harassment as punishment for whistle-blowing: Lancashirehttp://criticalreader17.blogspot.ae/2017/02/harassment-as-punishment-for-whistle.html which details just some of her targeting.

Also – along with numerous MPs and government agencies [from the P.M. down] including the IPCC, the IPT, and Lancs. police themselves, the HMIC [Her Majesty’s Inspector of Constabularies] totally ignore recent communications sent to them too regarding this ongoing blatant and extremely serious lawbreaking by a police force acting as a crime cartel does  – resulting in complete and utter lawlessness!!!  [see “MESSAGE TO HMIC BOSS – 13 DEC. 2017 + archive  .

Below, the I.P.T. reject the notification to them regarding rampant lawbreaking by Lancs. police:

This is the R. Mail signed recorded delivery receipt  [signature deliberately distorted] connected to the original communication with 20 pages of notes  which, I was told, “didn’t arrive” at the IPT, although this signature surely shows the opposite. The repeat sending of the same notes were sent in exactly the same way, to the same postal address, and were received perfectly well but, as the letter above shows, all was a waste of time regarding the installation of the GPS tracking device in the car although it surely clearly breaches the most basic of Data Protection laws as well as Article 8 of the E.C.H.R. [see below]:

————————————————————————————————————————
WHAT is happening to Carol Woods, with her constant surveillance by the authorities and gangstalking by recruited yobs, along with others must surely be a specialist operation undertaken by Lancs. police. Is it not interesting that:

Chief Constable ​ [Merseyside police at present, formerly of Lancs. police]​

 Andy Cooke, QPM

​ ​
​  In 2008 I left Merseyside after being appointed as Assistant Chief Constable at Lancashire Constabulary with responsibility for Specialist Operations” [from:  ​https://www.merseyside.police.uk/about-us/chief-officer-group/chief-constable-andy-cooke-qpm/
Specialist operations? What is happening to Carol Woods is surely aSpecialist Operation“!
He also led the ACPO Witness Protection programme in 2015 when this radio programme was made – see @ 9mins 30secs into this video https://vimeo.com/177346278 on certain failings of that operation.

Numerous communications have been sent to Mr. Cooke, and many others at Lancs. police regarding the deplorable targeting of Carol Woods, beginning in 2006 – everything has been ignored – see the recent update where Carol’s car was vandalised, but the local police refused to even acknowledge the  crime: 

The Carol Woods Coverup: Car vandalised – Lancs. police do nothing 19 Dec. 2017

—————————————————————————————————————————–

Another recent update – [see ARCHIVE of all 120+ posts since Feb. 2016 – https://butlincat.com/?s=carol+woods ] 

Archive continues:

The Carol Woods Coverup: UPDATE: THE ILLEGAL GPS DEVICE IN CAROL’S CAR BRINGS OUT THE STALKERS – 19 Dec. 17 + archive

 

On 18 December 2017 at 19:02, carol woods <woodsresearch2002@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Dear Sirs,
I called into Lancaster University and as usual via the ILLEGAL GPS on my car which you all know about and do nothing about to assist me, the Gestapo arrange ANOTHER FRAUD and thug with trollop in “met with” farce INTENDED TO FORGERY and DEFRAUD ME. I attach here YET AGAIN the PROOF that the thugs in Lancashire have pretended for YEARS that I have met with lowlife when I have not. Not one person responded to the PROOF of FORGERY, FRAUD and worse.
Thus I leave the uni library and a local roughneck had been sent to stand about and “hide” outside but to walk as if “with me” when I left. (YOU FUND ALL THIS PROVIDING TAXIS ETC.) She had the PINK BAG which the Gestapo use in lunacy to pretend the user is me or my daughter. The reason is out of scope of this but the reason has been sent many times to show what lunatics I deal with. I took a photo of that troll. Also parked in a hiding position was the usual large car of thug, white which was then to speed off and PRETEND that I was with MY daughter and WE MET WITH THAT THUG as it was the 18th and they want to “revise” the 18 Sept 2008 FRAUD. I met with no one; all the plans to “see me off” by using lowlife round Fell View LA2 9RP having failed again to manufacture “proof I commit fraud, theft etc” they resort to “meeting with”. I met with no one and who paid that thug to drive all this way to park and pretend and, what was in it for the troll? Yours Carol Woods Ms I have heard from no one at all incidentally and have no phone whatever the deranged try to invent for me. Under duress at 28 Fell View LA2 9RP. Please feel free to quote me.
PS the daughter is one they threatened and intimidated for years as she was a great support for me. I have not seen her for 5 years now so the thugs leave her alone; MIKE TODD was murdered in all this leading to Sept 2008 and my daughter the lunatics dragged into it for a reason which will ALL be revealed. I will also add that via their ILLEGAL activity, they have spoiled the scanner I use in Lancaster university library; they want to stop me scanning here as they claim so many others are me who have no access to the uni and, they want to stop me scanning more of what Mike Todd had in front of him, what he was prosecuting on and why he was murdered. SOME of what he had in front of him was a bogus bankruptcy, perjury, EXTORTION, DEMAND MONEY WITH MENACES, WITNESS INTIMIDATION, ATTEMPTED MURDER PREMEDITATED, POLICE CORRUPTION AND CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER CHILD ABUSE ETC ETC. You can’t all be corrupt or cowardly; someone needs to assist me. Why would I want to meet with a thug and agree to pay money not owed?
I returned to the library after the troll had walked off and the thug had driven off. We will see if they want to repeat the exercise when I leave again.
​==============================================

SECTION OF A MESSAGE TO A [so called] TOP BARRISTER, 18 Dec. 2017: [there was no reply – so far. Interesting. This was the same barrister who told me this police force couldn’t be prosecuted. I replied that I thought “noone was above the law”? How foolish we general public are to think all men are equal under the law when its not like that at all].

“Regarding the errors which show themselves connected to this Act [regarding this device installed in Ms. Wood’s car], obvious discrepancies arise, do they not, when I quote the Act’s wording, and what is actually occurring in real time, for it is clearly stated within the Act that, regarding GPS devices and motor vehicles:

it is vital that organisations maintain a vehicle tracking policy that is fully transparent and compliant with the Data Protection Act. Under this Act, persons who have tracking devices installed in the vehicles they own have the right to know what information is being held about them and the purpose for which it will be used. For this reason, collecting data covertly is considered to be in breach of the law”.  

To summerise: if the actions of Lancs. police are “covert policing actions” as they have clearly stated in writing in a letter, then that action clearly contravenes the D.P. Act as the actions are not “fully transparent”, and have to be. By not telling any information, it is surely deemed “secretive”, or covert”, is it not?

The D.P. Act goes on to state:
Furthermore, personal data can only be processed if at least one of the following applies:
1•The person concerned must have consented to the process
2•There is a contractual or legal obligation to process the data
3•It is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the subject”.

Taking the statement to pieces, we note that 

a] the words by the 1st dot:  “The person concerned must have consented to the process” [of having the device in her car] –  Ms. Woods did not consent to the process of her motor vehicle being tracked, which rules out the very 1st line shown above being followed properly, according to the Act, 

and 

b] re: the 2nd line above, by the 2nd dot: “There is a contractual or legal obligation to process the data”– Ms. Woods has not been given any data pertaining to this device, “processed” or “unprocessed” and therefore the “legal obligation” by Lancs. police is broken, especially because the wording in the Act states: “Under this Act, persons who have tracking devices installed in the vehicles they own have the right to know what information is being held about them and the purpose for which it will be used”. Please note that Ms. Woods has been told nothing about anything re: the device, and the device has been in her car much longer than when she made the SAR [FOIA] request and paid the fee at the force’s Hutton HQ in Ja. 2017. Another clear irregularity where laws are broken.

Lancs. police have stated in writing that this device falls under “covert policing actions” and as such do not tell anything regarding this device – what it’s for, why it is there, or what information is gleaned by the device and what that info is used for – all these actions fall foul of the spirit of the Act and the Act itself – which surely makes the device totally not legal. 

Nothing to do with the device is “fully transparent” from Ms. Woods perspective, which it should be. 

Finally, the statement in the 3rd line and by the 3rd dot, referring presumably to 1] Ms. Woods being “the subject” = and the words: “It is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the subject”: Ms. Woods is not protected in any way by having this device in her car, and BE IT KNOWN THAT THE DIRECT OPPOSITE IT TRUE AS THERE HAVE BEEN DIFFERENT ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS UPON MS. WOODS BY STALKERS WHILST SHE HAS BEEN DRIVING HER CAR – THE EXACT OPPOSITE of a “protective” device, as clearly stated within the Act. 

Surely it is clear that Lancs. police’s “policy” fails entirely to be not only “a policy that is fully transparent and compliant with the Data Protection Act”, but that the Act has failed to be followed in so many areas.

PLUS this device ALSO breaches the E.C.H.R., Article 8 as already explained, that being the device breaches Ms. Woods privacy every time she enters her car.” [ends]

———————————————————————————–

The Carol Woods Coverup: UPDATE: THE TRACKING DEVICE: LANCS. POLICE WRITE 17 Nov. 17 – 18 Dec. 17 + more

Despite at least 3 employees at the Home Office, and other government employees recommending in printed letters, including one from Mike Penning MP that I take any grievance regarding Lancs. police’s behaviour connected to Carol Woods to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal [IPT] I can now say that this outfit is doing nothing at all regarding my sending them 15 pages of notes and a wad of their forms regarding the illegal tracking device that was installed in Carol Wood’s car by Lancs. police. Likewise the IPCC has also refused to act on complaints concerning Lancs. police’s actions, and have stated in writing that anything sent will be referred to Lancs. police for conclusion! Not only that, a top barrister, whose name I won’t mention here, has also advised that the CPS will not prosecute a police force, no matter what. There we have it.  Also, the official F.O.I. Act [S.A.R.] fee was paid [and the receipt obtained] to Lancs. police at their Hutton, Preston HQ in January 2017 by Carol Woods for the proper and obligatory information relating to the GPS device in her car, THAT INFORMATION STILL BEING WITHELD BY LANCS. POLICE – another offence. See how the device entered Carol’s car here, below, entitled:  “Carol Woods statement of HOW THE TRACKING DEVICE CAME TO BE IN MS. CAROL WOODS MOTOR VEHICLE”.

Concerning the “Data Protection Act 1998”, it is clearly stated within it that:

it is vital that organisations maintain a vehicle tracking policy that is fully transparent and compliant with the Data Protection Act. Under this Act, persons who have tracking devices installed in the vehicles they own have the right to know what information is being held about them and the purpose for which it will be used. For this reason, collecting data covertly is considered to be in breach of the law.”  To summerise: if the actions of Lancs. police are “covert policing actions” as they have clearly stated in writing in a letter, then that action clearly contravenes the D.P. Act as the actions are not “fully transparent”, and have to be. 

The D.P. Act goes on to state:
“Furthermore, personal data can only be processed if at least one of the following applies:
•The person concerned must have consented to the process
•There is a contractual or legal obligation to process the data
•It is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the subject”.

PLEASE NOTE: a] Ms. Woods did not consent to the process of her motor vehicle being tracked, which rules out the very 1st line shown above, and re: the 2nd line above – Ms. Woods has not been given any data pertaining to this device, and therefore the “legal obligation” by Lancs. police is broken,

and

re: the 3rd line, Ms. Woods is not protected in any way by having this device in her car, and therefore this device is not justified in any way. ALSO, BE IT KNOWN THAT THERE HAVE BEEN ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS UPON MS. WOODS BY STALKERS WHILST SHE HAS BEEN DRIVING HER CAR – THE EXACT OPPOSITE of a “protective” device which is defined in line 3 above, according to the Act. All in all, this device breaches not on the Data Protection Act itself in many areas, but ALSO THE E.C.H.R., as already explained, that being the device breaches Ms. Woods privacy!

A] Ms. Woods has the right to know what information is being held about her and the purpose for which it will be used, but she has never been told anything regarding her motor vehicle being tracked.

Directly below, is the pointless and meaningless response received from Lancs. police, dated 17 November 2017.  I say meaningless because this response doesn’t actually address anything – but it does actually state the no investigation AT ALL has been undertaken regarding the complaint made about the GPS tracking device in Carol’s car, only a response at “local resolution” level – a pointless exercise meaning, more than likely, that an extremely informal chat took place between certain “officers” over a cup of tea during a “tea break” in the police station canteen to resolve the extremely serious and longstanding complaint regarding the horrific and blatant targeting of a vulnerable, single, lawabiding old age pensioner who gave her entire life in service to others – particularly vulnerable and lone CHILDREN. Trying to get the right and proper conclusion to the abject and preplanned flouting of the law by these characters has taken so far 9 months, since March 2017, when my original communication [below]  was sent to the then Chief Constable Finnegan, who then left his post and moved on! The latest interaction is hardly worth reporting, despite the misleading title of the team that has been sadly been corresponding for a minimum amount of time compared to the original date of beginning this complaint  – MARCH 2017 – 9 MONTHS AGO. All that’s happened is that nothing to do with any investigation or conclusion to anything has taken place, or even been remotely near, yet pointless paperwork like the below was sent, to presumably, keep me quiet, in,line, shut up and satisfiedI don’t think so.   Despite this contemptuous timewasting and subsequent squandering of our tax money [which funds the pointless nonsense of illegal tracking devices in totally lawabiding citizen’s cars also] LANCS. POLICE ARE STILL GUILTY OF BREACHING NOT ONLY ARTICLE 8 OF THE E.C.H.R. BUT ALSO THE DATA PROTECTION ACT by not saying anything about it to the innocent recipient of the GPS device which it is their duty to do, and are guilty of probably A WHOLE LOT MORE regarding everything that we aren’t even aware of, such as “unjustifable police actions” and the “rampant squandering of public funds” etc. etc..

Note in the very 1st line of the letter below it states that a “local resolution” has been enacted by Lancs. police instead of the more proper and surely more appropriate “formal investigation” that should have taken place – a dead giveaway that little actual honesty at all is taking place here as opposed to the correct method of dealing with an illegal act and breach of the European Convention on Human Right’s Article 8, which states: 

1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.”

See more regarding the “Data Protection Act” below in my original message to Lancs. police Chief Constable Finnegan, letter dated 31 March 2017, also contemptuously ignored on each sending [I’ve lost count how many letters of complaint have been sent to Lancs. police by myself alone regarding this tracking device, installed in the car of a person who has, probably, never broken a law in her life, and what’s more has more formal qualifications than the entire congregation of “police officers” that make up the entire Lancs, police HQ at Hutton, Preston, including the chief and deputy chief constables – and all the rest!]. Please use copious amounts of “discernment” regarding the latest extremely disappointing use of resources, and citizen’s taxes:

..

What kind of police force is  this that can persecute a lawabiding pensioner so badly for so long [since 2006]? For Lancs. police are responsible for a great deal of extremely questionable behaviour – for which there is OVERWHELMING and UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE.

The subject of pursuing justice regarding the despicable actions of LANCS. POLICE will be continue until JUSTICE IS DONE!!

See related: 

video: ILLEGAL GPS TRACKING DEVICE INSTALLED IN CAROL WOODS’s CAR – 18 Sept. 17

 

made during the 3 day visit – see more:  “…the Visit”:  The Shocking Carol Woods Coverup: VISIT / Lancs: Compromise agreement falsified, + archive 10 July 17

more:

— Received from Ms. Carol Woods on 17 OCTOBER 2017:

“Carol Woods statement of HOW THE TRACKING DEVICE CAME TO BE IN MS. CAROL WOODS MOTOR VEHICLE”

16 / 10 / 2017

“hi, just got the mail – completely crazy at my return [Ms. Woods had been away on holiday…JG.] – preface my car was not at an airport car park – apparently I am the owner of a silver grey Yaris much newer than mine – I seem to be an Asian female with long, dark hair.
Preface Fell View is now 298 Oxcliffe Rd thus I have just bought my car AND AM NOT THE VICTIM FROM 2012.

I looked on Northern Car Sales site, Shaw Rd. Oldham January 2012 when staying with my sister – I only went onto the yard to get rid of a thug following me – he just used his phone presumably to say I looked at cars. I decided a car for sale was affordable and having a car would solve massive problems. I went back the next day and felt sure they expected me. Another car had appeared – the red Yaris and I was diverted to that. I had a test drive, liked it, agreed to buy it – cash. But the car price was £40 short of [my sister owed me money so I knew I’d get it] – the garage was responsible for completing the tear off strip for DVLA doc. change of owner / address of registered person. All that done, I had to go and get insurance before removing the car – I knew I’d have been arrested for driving without insurance if I drove it just to my sister’s. The insurance matter was awful – I’ve had other cars and never experienced the antics but – all done the garage told me not to collect the car until 5pm on 21/1/12 – why? Surely they just wanted it off the yard as sold?
I went at 3pm to see what they were up to. My ignition was in bits – I was told they had snapped my key in the lock so needed to replace the system to accomodate a new key. I told them I was not daft – I thought of my white Polo – I told them what I thought they were doing – I was right, they had been
2]
contacted and told if they wanted to stay in business, they’ed do as told. Gestapo? Yes. Then he said “You’re dealing with lunatics” – I said, “I know”. I went to sit in the office – the DVLA slip I could see – the man in the office assured me he would send it on – I was using my sister;s address to register the car. He told me not to bother about the £40 which I’d said I’d drop in with on 22 Jan.
Getting the car about 5, I asked why there was no new key – he’d broken the original, old key, hadn’t he? I also asked why they had not used the spare key and just had a 2nd as spare cut – they knew I knew exactly what had gone on. Oddly, the man said “They can’t keep on arresting you” – “of course they can – who’ll stop them?” I said – a bit more chat – I said I’d be in the next morning with £40, was told not to bother but I wasn’t falling for that. It was a trap.
Parking at my sister’s then showing her the car – I saw 900 miles had been added to the clock from my agreeing to buy it. [I faxed the Home Saecretary and K Clarke at least 3 times each to get that on record – where the hell had I apparently been to use 900 miles?].
The next morning I went with the £40 – they were not open – or pretended – the £40 trap was set. I took a note of the 2 x £20 notes, scribbled a note, put in an envelope and took photos of it going imnto the letterbox. I owed them nothing.
On the 23rd Jan. I drove to Lancaster and transferred my insurance to my company – one I’d used for over 20 years – they were really good and getting all the refund due to me, showed illegal accessing of the company systems.
PTO
The Gestapo pulled me up after I left my insurance company [each event has it’s own story] – just to harass – to be seen to be a liar – then I returned to my sister’s. I left her house and stayed in a guest house for 4 days – called into the garage and they had NOT sent the DVLA doc. on. I asked for it and dealt with it myself. They had no intention of sending it in. For days then weeks then months [I started to rent at 298 on 4/3/12 after driving to Lewes to deal with outstanding matters from 2011 and living in my car most of Feb.] attempts were made to stealing my car key so I would then have to force my locks to get in and have new locks – their problem was they could not claim I had stolen the car, that I drove without insurance, and that I knew of the GPS – and how I could prove they had not broken the key at all to have a new ignition system fitted.
With amazing luck, my car key was stolen but I had the spare key in my bag so didn’t need to force the locks – had another spare cut and so it went on.
Followed into the ladies in students union offices which are not open to all and sundry – at the Uni – washing my hands – my keys placed by the sink disappeared – reported – ignored. I knew it had to be 1 of 2 trolls – again, I’d had my spare in my bag and always keep a spare. 2 garages have looked [April ’16 and May ’16] to see if they can remove it but said “too sophisticated” and will disable the car if they try to remove it.”
[ENDS]

N.B.: Everything to do with this illegal GPS tracking device, including everything above was sent as a complaint to Lancs. police, and their “Investigations Team”s response was – nothing, and thus everything was then forwarded to the Investigations Powers Tribunal [IPT] after filling in all their forms, and sending 15 pages or so of documents pertaining to the device and related items, including Lancs. police’s so-called “responses” – the IPT’s response has also been – nothing. The woman I spoke to weeks ago at the IPT when chasing up my sending of the  IPT forms and related docs. notifying the IPT about this GPS device even told me the IPT tribunal would probably dismiss my contacting them regarding this matter of this illegal GPS device, or deem everything inadmissable – and this was the receptionist on the phone one gets when initially calling in to the!  To date, 12 Dec. 17, I am still waiting to hear from the IPT regarding anything to do with the 15 pages of notes and forms sent to them – completely unaccptable! 

“COVERT POLICING TACTICS”?

Regarding the illegal “tracking device” installed in Carol Wood’s motor vehicle, and despite CW’s asking for obligatory information from Lancs. police regarding this device after her paying the proper “Freedom of Information” request fee at Lancs. police Hutton HQ in January 2017 was totally ignored, Lancs. police wanted a letter of permission, finally, from CW so I could interact with Lancs. police on her behalf so my complaint regarding this “tracking device” being installed in Carol Woods motor vehicle [and other matters] could be taken seriously.

One original contact with Lancs. police was in March 2017 [below] to the chief constable Finnegan, who promptly moved on from his postition – my communication completely ignored, as was every other communication sent until I contacted 3 chief constables a couple of months later regarding not being able to report serious crime to the police, which was also ignored by all sent to, so then I had no choice but to begin complaining about that. The “Investigations Support Team” of Lancs. police answered finally, [below] requiring a “letter of permission” from Carol Woods so as I could interact on her behalf regarding matters, also below. Now, after that “letter of permission” was finally received in writing from CW, and sent to Lancs. police, still nothing is done by Lancs. police Professional Standards and “Investigations Team” about this “tracking device”!

Typical recent  communication from the Lancs. police “Professional Standards” dept. regarding my complaint to them regarding the device in Carol’s car, which breaches not only the E.C.H.R. but also the Data Protection Act:

THE “LETTER OF PERMISSION”:

The “letter of permission” from Carol Woods, dated 24 August 17, asked for by and sent 25 Aug. 17 to Lancs. police by recorded delivery 1st class Royal Mail, partly acknowledged now by Lancs. police:

Below, the original [ignored] communication from 31 March 2017 to the then Lancs. police chief constable Finnegan regarding the illegal GPS tracking device in Carol’s car. All other communications regarding this subject and reporting serious crime are ignored by all police contacted – including my local police, and 3 chief constables, until finally 2 local officers visited myself unexpectedly [after I had written so many times to the Dorset CC trying to make contact with police] on Saturday 9 June 17 at 9pm   claiming – after my explaining as best I could the utter chaos Carol is forced to suffer courtesy of the authorities in Lancs., – that they would report matters concerning Carol Woods to Lancs. police, and Carol would be contacted by Lancs. police forthwith. Of course no such contact has been made by Lancs. police to Carol as promised – the daily persecution continues unabated, though.

“From:  Mr. J. Graham, [redacted]

To:  Mr.  S. Finnegan,  Chief Constable of Lancashire Police,
Lancashire Constabulary Headquarters,
Saunders Lane,
Hutton nr Preston,
PR4 5SB.

31 March 2017

Dear Mr. Finnegan,

I am writing to you concening the tracking device installed in the motor vehicle used by Ms. CAROL WOODS.

Ms Carol Woods address is:  28 Fell View, Caton, Lancashire, LA2 9RP.

I’m sure you are aware that regarding Ms. Woods motor vehicle, not only does such a device installed in her vehicle contavene 1] the Data Protection Act 1998, but also contravenes Ms. Woods rights according to 2] the European Commission of Human Rights [E.C.H.R.] – please see below:

1] The Data Protection Act 1998:

“The UK vehicle tracker laws fall under the category of processing personal data and accordingly, it is governed by the Data Protection Act 1988. In order to ensure vehicle tracking legality, it is vital that organisations maintain a vehicle tracking policy that is fully transparent and compliant with the Data Protection Act. Under this Act, persons who have tracking devices installed in the vehicles they own have the right to know what information is being held about them and the purpose for which it will be used. For this reason, collecting data covertly is considered to be in breach of the law.
Furthermore, personal data can only be processed if at least one of the following applies:
•The person concerned must have consented to the process
•There is a contractual or legal obligation to process the data
•It is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the subject”.

PLEASE NOTE: a] Ms. Woods did not consent to the process of her motor vehicle being tracked, and

b] Ms. Woods has the right to know what information is being held about her and the purpose for which it will be used, but she has never been told anything regarding her motor vehicle being tracked.

and

2] The European Court of Human Rights “Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides a right to respect for one’s “private and family life, his home and his correspondence”

1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.”

PLEASE NOTE:  referring to the European Court of Human Rights, Article 8:
Ms. Woods right to privacy has clearly been breached by the interference of this tracking device installed in her motor vehicle.

Mr. Finnegan, it is clear that such a tracking device installed in Ms. Woods motor vehicle is in clear breach of these 2 statutes cited above, and in the respect of trying to obtain information regarding this tracking device, Ms. Woods states:
 “I have asked specifically for the data in relation to PERMISSION for GPS sought and then gained, and paid £10

but received nothing. I TOOK my £10 in Jan 2017 after asking if I needed to pay £10 via

data.protection@lancashire.pnn.police.uk Jan this year, it was acknowledged as received as I drove all the way to HUTTON HQ, to deliver it (I asked them to formally acknowledge receipt) as well as getting a receipt there at the front desk”. Therefore Ms. Woods has applied for the information regarding the tracking device in her vehicle, but not received any information in return – an extremely serious irregularity. Can you please remove this device from Ms. Woods motor vehicle that is clearly falling foul of the statutes in place – those being the Data Protection Act 1998  and the Article 8 of the European Commission of Human Rights?

Mr. Finnegan, failure to acknowledge this communication will result in my contacting the highest authorities regarding these breaches of the said statutes stated above.

Thank you.

J. Graham  concerned citizen” [ENDS]

After much stalling by the Lancs. police to even admit there was a tracking device in Ms. Woods car this letter below was finally received on the 27 September 17 from Lancs, police “Investigations Team” with the admission that a tracking device was being used in Carol’s car and was being used under “covert policing tactics“, which is quite a remarkable example of bs considering known jihadi terrorists in the UK surely are not stalked  as severely, nor are organised criminal gang members. Carol is neither of those, and it is painfully obvious that the only reason the device is being used at all is to blatantly harass and gangstalk Carol every time she goes out and drives her car.  Indeed, attempts to murder Carol have taken place when she has been driving her car, when the unemployed stalking yobs who harass Carol all the time anyway have tried a few times to manufacture road traffic accidents where Carol would be the injured – or deceased – party. I myself witnessed – as a passenger in Carol’s car when I visited earlier this year – these stalking yobs driving their car perilously close to Carol’s completely unneccessarily, and performing outrageous manoevres with the passengers in the offending car looking back, once passed, laughing hysterically at their perverse actions. Again, Lancs. police have much to answer for by paying these thugs to perform such cr-p, deliberately endangering lives in the process.

“COVERT POLICING TACTICS” ARE CITED IN THE LETTER BELOW FROM LANCS. POLICE AS THE REASON this GPS device has been installed in Carol’s car – BUT WHY? Carol is no “JIHADI TERRORIST”, nor a member of any ORGANISED CRIME CARTEL, or anything to do with anything CRIMINAL, yet Lancs. police have installed this GPS tracking device in her car and WON’T TELL HER WHY!!  WHYEVER NOT??  Not only does this GPS device breach Carol’s HUMAN RIGHTS [Article 8 of the E.C.H.R.] but by not telling Carol why the device is there in the first place also breaches Carol’s rights under the DATA PROTECTION ACT. She has paid the correct fee at the Lancs. police Hutton HQ in January 2017 via a FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST [S.A.R.] that is the normal procedure to get the information but still Lancs. police refuse to forward any to her – ANOTHER CRIME!!27 sept covert lREDACT ancs inv20171016_00142207

THE IPCC:

Also, before contacting the IPT, a complaint was made to the IPCC  regarding not being able to report serious crimes, which included the

a] installation of the “tracking device” in CW’s vehicle,

b] Dorset Police hanging up in me when being contacted by them regarding reporting serious crimes pertaining to Carol Woods to any police,

and

c] Lancs. police ignoring communications to them over the months, and not responding after the 2 Dorset officers who visited myself on 9 June 17 claiming they would be contacting Lancs. police who would then be contacting Carol Woods [no such contact was made, naturally]. Below is my complaint to the IPCC and their response – which was to pass everything back to Lancs. police, who were stonewalling in the first place and responsible for the numerous irregularities anyway!!!, [and still are]:

To:   enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
26 June 2017 at 22:45
Dear Ms. Coulton,
Here, below, is my latest communication to yourself in reply to your message to me, dated 22 June 17.
 I DO wish to report as stated to the I.P.C.C. the matters described.
Thank you.
J. Graham  concerned citzen
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: !enquiries <enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
Date: 22 June 2017 at 12:32
Subject: IPCC Reference – xxxxxxx

To: “butlincat75@googlemail.com” <butlincat75@googlemail.com>Dear Mr Graham

Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). We acknowledge receipt of your email dated 13 June 2017, the contents of which have been filed under the above reference number.

I note from your email that you are unhappy with the police, however it is not clear if you are wishing to submit a formal complaint against the police.

If you wish to make a new complaint or allegation of misconduct against a serving member of the police then the IPCC can forward it on your behalf to the relevant police force. If you do wish to make such a complaint or allegation we will need to be provided with the following information;

WHO? Which police force is your complaint about?

WHERE? Where did the incident/s happen that led to your complaint?

WHEN? When did the incident/s happen that led to your complaint?

WHAT? Please describe the circumstances that have led to you feeling the police have treated you badly.

If however you do not wish to make a new complaint or allegation of misconduct, or submit an appeal against a concluded investigation into a previous complaint I do not believe the IPCC can assist you any further at this time.

Please note that all complaints made to the IPCC by law must be forwarded to the ‘appropriate authority’ for consideration – usually this is the Professional Standards Department (PSD) of the police force concerned. When you submit your complaint in full your details will be passed onto the PSD for consideration.

Yours sincerely

Customer Contact Advisor Independent Police Complaints Commission

(IPCC)———- Forwarded message ———-
From: butlincat <butlincat75@googlemail.com>
Date: 23 June 2017 at 11:14
Subject: IPCC Reference – 2017/087595
To: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

Dear IPCC

I do wish to raise a complaint against Lancs police

​ – specifically Mr. ​S. ​Finnegan C​hief Constable as he refuses to answer numerous messages to him,
​specifically the one shown below dated 31 March 17, and against also their Professional Standards, who are mentioned in the attached  response ​[letter] from Lancs police – they still have not contacted me as promised.
Thanks
J. Graham
.

The above communication was replied to in full by the IPCC – the end result simply stating that everything was passed back to Lancs. police by the IPCC – hence the Lancs Police “Investigations Team” finally responding via their “covert police tactics” letter on the 27 September 2017. The next stage was complaining to the IPT, which was done, but has got nowhere as I write on 12 Dec. 17. – the entire process beginning in March 2017 with the letter to the ex-CC Finnegan.

Meanwhile, the Home Office wrote to send everything regarding this “tracking device” to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal [as already detailed above] – the letter dated 31 August 17, something that Carol did already some time ago – her comment: 

Date: 5 September 2017 at 15:46
Subject: Re: Fwd: Win cw

Hi thanks for this; firstly, I have 3 huge files from the Gestapo from 2002 when they claimed to the IPT that they had never heard of me and that I had never lived in Lancaster. That led to all sorts which included the IPT ceasing the FULL INQUIRY into my case after NATIONAL news bulletin April 2006, “The government has ordered an inquiry into how Lancashire conducts its affairs”. The Gestapo spoiled all that: the IPT just returned my file to me with no comments. It was March 2008 JUST THE WEEK MIKE TODD WAS MURDERED when the IPT told me in a letter that they thought Carol Woods was an alias and that I was really someone else somewhere else, my sister in fact.” [ENDS]

The above are just part of numerous communications to and from UK government departments regarding the appalling and illegal targeting of Carol Woods by certain UK government personnel paid by the taxpayer to act in a responsible and honest manner, which include, especially, the police – local to Ms. Woods and the main force, and the county council, and all connected, including Royal Mail, who refuse to do anything regarding Carol’s mail being deliberately diverted and misdelivered, or delivered to her months later – or not delivered at all.

to be continued, when any progress is made with these dubious government departments!

RELATED:

The Shocking Carol Woods Coverup: SHOCKINGLY, LANCS. POLICE ALTER RECORDS YET AGAIN! + Lancs court corruption ; party to M Todd R.I.P. + The False Arrests / P.C. Massingham’s Perjury 31 Oct. 2017 + archive

——————————————————————————————-

The “Bug Detector” in use: video:

 


RELATED [from earlier]:

The Shocking Carol Woods Coverup: Lancs. police still refuse to acknowledge the illegal “vehicular tracking device” and other serious crimes against Carol Woods 11 Sept. 17 + archive

 

The Carol Woods Coverup: Car vandalised – Lancs. police do nothing 19 Dec. 2017

On Tuesday, 19 December 2017, 20:52, carol woods  wrote:

“Just to let you know I returned to my car after an early cinema show (8 15pm) and found my car window smashed among all the cars parked on the street and only mine any damage. Some people passing loaned me their phone so I rang he Gestapo and a cop came, motor bike and took the details of a car parked illegally at a bus stop near by; he did not bother about my car. Dec 2005 and Daisy Mae Morrison’s car was vandalised outside my house, we had gone into Lancaster. That was WITNESS INTIMIDATION and in Jan 2006 when she called again and her car was written off, I had my court case then stayed to protect my witnesses. In Dec 2008 they stole my car K71 CEC and installed a GPS, I found out and they stole my car taking it to the police garage MACADAMS where they systematically wrecked it to hide the GPS installed then illegally. The Gestapo have stalked all day trying to pretend they see me driven by another. I can drive my car back to Hell View and cover up the windows. They started on my car over a week ago. Carol (so someone knows) the street is terraced houses and someone must have heard it all.

To Lancs but CC to others who will get the gist, I require the name rank and badge number of the Gestapo driving AGAIN this time to confirm he saw me and a RED MINI and not the yellow one of the earlier farce. The yellow MINI details I sent via email; the red was HD59 NUK and does not rewrite the Aug 2015 and helicopter farce using the RED MINI then to pretend A Jackson of 26 Fell View was me.
I also note that YOU arranged for my car windows to be smashed to be Daisy Mae’s car at my house Dec 2005 and then Jan 2006 in WITNESS INTIMIDATION with the thugs then following me to a corner shop to threaten and intimidate me. The dreary old loser stalking me after the library about 5 45pm reminded me of those thugs that night Jan 2006.FOR THOSE CC THIS I HAD MY THEN COURT APPEAL STAYED TO PROTECT MY WITNESSES. DAISY MAE IS BLACK SO IT WAS AGGRAVATED BY RACISM AND HER CAR WAS WRITTEN OFF IN JAN 06 AS MINE WAS IN THE REPEAT OF JAN 2009 AFTER MY HOUSE HAD BEEN WRECKED OF COURSE WITH THE WINDOWS THERE RIPPED OUT IN THAT WRECKING OF MY HOUSE IN OCT 08 PRIOR TO MY CAR.
MY car K71 CEC was stolen with an illegal GPS device fitted in Dec 2008 and then stolen in Jan 2009 and written off BY YOUR GARAGE MACADAMS of Carnforth to hide the illegal GPS then.
I note that the Gestapo biker called after some people were kind enough to help me at my car and reported the TARGETED VANDALISM via their phone. The Gestapo was not calling about my reported car but to note a car illegally parked on a bus stop. EJ61 NPF and if you think that makes me forget the GMP thugs at my brother’s house parked then at a bus stop in Nov 2004 to threaten and intimidate you can think again, bullying thugs. This to GMP thugs and so they know my photos of that night are excellent and WILL BE SEEN.
You are a disgrace. Carol Woods Ms PS the officer taking my car report was decent. I WAIT TO TESTIFY. [ends]

HOW COME THE POLICE OFFICER DESCRIBED ABOVE DIDN’T EVEN RECORD THIS CRIME OF VANDALISM TO A CAR?  WHAT’S GOING ON WITH LANCS. POLICE? 

Some Background to the targeting of Carol Woods:

Carol Woods = “It is a highly complex matter which the police organise where they try to make me someone I am not. They have in fact tried to invent me as the reverse of myself using numerous characters, including “neighbours” who live alongside myself, and others elsewhere – the entire situations going back years. I find things out because I am not stupid. See my original w’blowing blog York LGO Blog re Lancashire CC   http://criticalreader2006.blogspot.ae/ you will see why I am hounded by lowlife RECRUITED to do that by the Gestapo.

More is described here:   “Harassment as punishment for whistle-blowing: Lancashire” http://criticalreader17.blogspot.ae/2017/02/harassment-as-punishment-for-whistle.html.

Apart from numerous and longstanding ID frauds [where goods and other services have been obtained by dubious “neighbours” in her locale using Carol Wood’s ID, much obtained via her stolen mail – something Royal Mail has been notified about an infinite amount of times, with no proper response at all] and along with many other serious crimes enacted in her name [see the list below in the section entitled “Some Background, below] Carol Woods is stalked daily by her neighbours who are, it is very strongly alleged, employed by the local police and other factions of Lancs. county council. Ms. Woods is particularly targeted at the library which she has to use for the use of the computers therein, as having computers and phones etc. at her home has proven futile because of them being hacked by the same individuals who hack the library computers whenever she uses them. These unemployed, mostly male yobs, in the pay of the police etc. to surveille Ms. Woods [it is very strongly alleged], openly sit alongside her in the library, mobile phones in their hands while they hack the computer Ms. Woods is using, scanning and interfering with whichever emails to and from Ms. Woods they see fit, amongst other electronic interference.

What is particularly appalling also is that – apart from the Royal Mail letters being deliberately misdelivered to criminal neighbours etc. – so many serious crimes committed against Ms. Woods have been refused being reported for years now, to the police and other government agencies, including the IPCC who do nothing when told about complaints involving Lancs. police. Apart from Ms. Woods continually contacting police departments and politicians and other government agencies, other supporters have contacted UK Government departments regarding the serious crimes Ms. Woods is victim of, I personally have approached 3 different chief constables of 3 different police forces to no avail, and the IPCC have been complained to regarding this lack of duty by police employees – the IPCC merely passing my concerns back to the force allegedly behind the bulk of so many of the very strongly alleged crimes – Lancs. police. Contacting these UK Government departments has proven a complete waste of time, such is the coverup involved to do with so much of what is very strongly alleged concerning Ms. Carol Woods.

The posts and updates from Ms. Woods on this site alone detail this harassment from Ms. Woods neighbours along with detailing many of the numerous crimes committed since Febuary 2016 when Ms. Woods was forcibly detained for no reason other than to silence her in a mental unit, for the 5th time. As there were no proper grounds for Ms. Woods to be held in the mental unit, she was released after protests were made. This enforced kidnapping of Ms. Woods was the 5th time such a kidnapping had occurred to Ms. Woods because of the input by certain authorities who completely shirk their responsibilities and cover up serious crime – eg. employing and paying from the public purse criminals who flout the law by  stalking Ms. Woods almost daily, and every time Ms. Woods leaves her abode, and also enabling them to partake in numerous ID frauds completely outside of the law, and much more – the reporting of numerous DWP benefit frauds and connected to the DWP fraud department, and to the banks – Barclays and Santander – who had numerous accounts in false names to launder the DWP monies gained illegally, proving a complete waste of time also.

Some more background:

In the latest posts and in the archive linked, Carol  goes into greater detail regarding what she is having to experience from those around her, all with, it seems, the full cooperation and assistance of the local authorities who command the numerous crimes and the actions of the numerous lowlife stalkers she is surrounded by.  Not only do these nightmare neighbours she is surrounded by steal her landline telephone and internet delivery lines running into her house, and misuse it on an almost daily basis by the lines being previously diverted to their more than likely ramshackle homes, they also steal her electricity too when they can [when Carol switches it on], and much more. Carol can hear her neighbours testing their electricity sockets after she has turned her power on from the main switch in her home. For this very reason her electricity supply is having to be almost permanently switched off for fear of it being hacked by these criminal neighbours, she lives by candlelight and she has had to live electricity free in her home for years because of these lowlives’ thieving alongside her home – many of them doting and ageing pensioners who steal her services because they can and do not get criminally charged with anything – courtesy of the fake authoritarian figures in place who should be in prison rather than be sitting pretty in a government office somewhere, local or otherwise. Fake IDs used by so many – if not all – of Carol’s criminal neighbours pay for many things through fake bank accounts, the money all ultimately coming from the UK taxpayer – the general public, as are the new cars given as rewards to certain neighbours paid for the same way – the road tax etc for these cars also paid for by the UK public, as are the numerous “Blue Badge” schemes many of these cars are concessioned with – all registered via false details but paid for out of the public purse. Authorities do nothing when told about these scams – how much longer can these outright crimes continue?

Regarding the internet and phone lines running into her abode: Carol even witnessed the rewiring of such to cater for her neighbours criminal thieving when she came back home from being out one day – the lines being rearranged and diverted into her loft where the neighbour’s connections take place, and thus the ability for these thieves to steal her services. A bit of  detail about this stealing of Carol’s services – when Carol came back from being out one day, she noticed an ironing board, of all things, leaning against a wall in one of her rooms which wasn’t there before she’d gone out. On moving the ironing board, there on the wall was – crudely written in biro or whatever – the electrician or whoever’s drawing for the rewiring of the phone + internet lines being diverted into her loft – for the use of the thieving neighbours as already described. This is why, when out on later outings to wherever, tell-tale ironing boards would be left deliberately en route – leaning against walls or whatever – for Carol not to miss. Such is the cruelty of the minds involved in this entire gangstalking scenario CW is having and has had to put up with for so many years. Does any authority  do anything about any of this stealing of her phone or internet services when they’re notified? No they don’t – the same way as the CEO of Royal Mail ignores all notifications to him regarding misdeliveries of CW’s mail to assorted neighbours [see earlier posts on this]. Other authorities also contemptuously ignore other notifications of gross irregularities / crimes sent to them. Why? Go figure. Semantic battles with the R. Mail’s current CEO proved pointless when trying to report the numerous and longstanding deliberate misdeliveries of mail to the neighbours who give CW such a hard time. As for these loutish neighbours and their hostilities, it’s hard to argue, for example, when someone wearing a police officer’s uniform making out they’re a police officer is intimidating one and breathing down one’s neck giving one preposterous orders to harass and hurt a fellow citizen – but harass and hurt they do, putting aside any semblance of conscience or, dare I say it – guilt. Perhaps the gift of a new car – or two – paid for by the UK taxpayers – eases their conscience and helps these sad characters turn the other cheek and commit serious crime and also stalk so inhumanly someone who devoted her entire working life in service to others – as Carol has – trying to help children especially. These lowlives – and the lowlives controlling all the conspiracies against Carol Woods – have much to answer for, and let’s hope that day comes soon when they get their comeuppance – noone likes a corrupt traitor, especially those who are in the positions they’re in, whose sky-high wages are paid by the UK taxpayer, and its funny how things turn around and come back ten times worse for those perpetrating these obscenities. But that’s noone’s problem but theirs.

It is completely unjust and as outrageous and unfair that I am refused reporting – by 3 separate police forces – serious crimes, as correspondence, or rather ignored correspondences to these 3 police forces, would show [UPDATE 24 JUNE 17 – a few days ago – at 20.53BST on the evening of Saturday 17 June, to be exact, 2 Dorset officers knocked on my door without any forewarning [after my now numerous messages to the Chief Constable]and although unprepared, I duly gave them such info as I could regarding the huge number of crimes listed so far as detailed by and committed against CW. After 50 minutes, one of the officers promised me that “Lancs. police would be got in touch with, with a view for them to contact CW”. Of course I immediately protested that, allegedly, the Lancs. police were one of the very parties behind this series of numerous ongoing crimes, and to do such would be a waste of time. Note that this has been tried before when Lancs. police have been told of certain crimes pertaining to CW by CW, and nothing has been done at all. Nevertheless, this was all I could expect, apparently. Who knows if anything was passed on to Lancs. police, and even if it was, will anything be done about anything? It is now weeks since Dorset police were informed that night of 17 June, and Ms. Woods harassment continues unabated – so the evidence points to the fact that nothing has been done regarding what was reported to those 2 Dorset police officers]. If one complains to higher authorities about this completely unacceptable situation, I would guess that the targeting I am experiencing almost on a daily basis – whenever I go out – would escalate to an unacceptable level, causing me to fear for my very own life. That is why also the updates from CW have been drastically curtailed here. So be it. William Burroughs, the great author, once said that if a person didn’t want to catch malaria, one shouldn’t go to an area where malaria is rife. I seemed to have stumbled into something similar. So be that also…

The question has been asked: “why would the “Powers That Be” target someone such as Carol Woods for so long [since 2006], involving so many perpetrators, committing so many serious crimes, funded by the public and local council taxpayers?”.

Carol Woods is a 63 years old former Lancashire County Council Level 3 Social Worker and Child Protection Officer [who used to train social workers] and a former Probation Officer, amongst many other things. Perhaps the appalling and chronic targeting she has no choice but to put up with 24/7 is because she reported numerous seriously grave irregularities she discovered, including child abuse, when being employed by Lancashire county council, and when one realises that the very controllers of the targeting and stalking Carol is forced to endure are, very probably, very closely connected to the same departments and personnel who are described in the links above and the “IMPORTANT VIDEOS” shown below, which detail what was discovered when Carol worked as a Child Protection officer in Lancashire, then it should not be hard to understand these hostilities enacted against her. Put it this way: the Welsh scientist, weapons expert and authority on biological warfare, employed by the British Ministry of Defence David Kelly was supposed to have leaked serious information to the detriment of the PTB at the time – look what happened to him. Now, Carol is no weapons expert, but one doesn’t have to be one to upset the proverbial apple cart bigtime. And anyway, we are told there have been assassination attempts upon her life too – quite a few in fact, including ramming her car at speed, on a main road, by perpetrators unknown…well, almost unknown.

And why is there an illegal tracking device installed in Ms. Woods car – put there, apparently – by Lancs. police? The Chief Constable of Lancashire has been written to so many times about so many serious matters with no response it’s quite remarkable. Another 2 chief constables have been written to asking can serious crime be reported to their forces also with no response whatsoever, and I have tried on more than one occasion to notify my local police about serious crime at my local central police station to be totally ignored every visit, which is just another public scandal!

Many more serious crimes and misdemeanours committed against Ms. Woods are all completely ignored by whichever UK government agency one tries to take anything to, including:

treason,

many murder attempts upon Carol,

impersonation, ID frauds,

person[s] impersonating police officers in official government hearings, [or hearing[s]  purporting to be official],

Royal Mail frauds,

monetary frauds involving: dubious bank accounts at numerous high street banks, the DWP, Social Security, town council[s] and other agencies,

illegal tracking of motor vehicle via GPS device [or similar],

a high number of motor vehicle “Blue Badge” [UK HM Government concession] frauds,

regular physical harassment / mental torture upon a person [aka “gangstalking”],

telephone / Internet Broadband  / electricity supply fraud,

wrongful arrest,

wrongful kidnapping[s] / incarceration[s] in UK HM Government units, police station[s], HM Prison[s] etc.,

home burglaries, car vandalism going uninvestigated by local police [see 

– many other instances of serious crime and illegal activity exist, and many acts contravening not only the Data Protection Act 1998, but also the contravention of articles pertaining to the European Commission of Human Rights [particularly Article 8].

What is going on is maybe unbelievable, and at times complicated, but that is surely deliberate and part of this outrageous targeting of a law-abiding citizen  – a lone female – who dared to report serious irregularities she found during her employment as a Level 3 social worker and Child Protection Officer. As a result, apart from the crimes committed against her as described, her house and contents with a value of £400,000+ was stolen from her, and her employment tribunal award of £50,000 found its way to someone who conspired against her who fraudulently took Carol Wood’s ID. Other serious crimes exist and continue to  this very day…

IMPORTANT VIDEOS

 1] PLAYLIST [3 videos]: EXPOSING FAKE SOCIAL WORKERS ETC. 06 Febuary 2016

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCT5hwoao38ThHG5Y6q3GSp_hsTwMK2UD

2] Please listen to this vital radio show interview with Ms. Woods from the 12 March 2016

http://www.mixcloud.com/TheFreedomTalkRadioNetwork/lancashire-greater-manchester-harrow-councils-cops-crime-coruption-carol-woods-whistleblower/

3] CAROL WOODS WHISTLEBLOWER ON RADIO lancashire police corruption county council 06 Febuary 2016

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/freedomtalkradioscotland/2016/02/21/andys-sunday-night-show-with-guest

4] CRIMINAL BRITAIN

 SriLankerC 24 April 2016

5] Interview by torquaytalkeytv  31 March 16

6] Carol Woods Social Worker Unlawfully Incarcerated In Psychiatric Gulag  https://youtu.be/-sMukHhkl4o   – 16 April 2016 by  GeorgeGreekTrucker

 

See all 120+ posts from Carol Woods since Feb. 2016 – https://butlincat.com/?s=carol+woods

————————-

FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

NB: DISCLAIMER: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

MAURICE KIRK: CAN ANYONE PLEASE HELP MAURICE? – 16 Jan. 2018 + archive

Today 16 Jan. 2018 letters [below] were received from Maurice, who is being treated appallingly, as usual, in HMP Parc, Bridgend, Wales. He writes that he is still refused phone calls out to friends / family, and also that he is refused his medication “for 6 days now”, as well as being denied hospital appointments, and more, appallingly. He writes it is the police who are blocking his hospital appointment[s], claiming, as a “MAPPA 3” subject [everything based on convoluted nonsense to cause maximum harassment on that] he is “too dangerous” to be taken to hospital. WHAT RUBBISH THEY COME OUT WITH!!  Anything to give him a hard time.

If anyone recalls before when MK was in HMP Cardiff during his last sentence beginning in November 2013 [for 17 months total incarceration], he had his ankle damaged [allegedly] by a thug warder who knew him of old, and disliked him immensely [allegedly] and kicked his ankle seriously hard enough to rebreak it and make it swell to the size of a football, according to visitor’s witness reports at the time. Not only did the prison play games by giving him only one crutch to get around at the time, or none at all at one point, which was a particularly cruel waste of time as one needs 2 crutches to be able for them to work, but they also put him on the top 4th landing of a wing used for cons doing life sentences – not the most salubrious of surroundings – the lack of crutches [and painkillers] giving him untold problems getting up  and down the banks of steps one has to use many times a day to get food, for starters, along with seeing the doctor etc., also located on the ground floor. Also denied him were painkillers, and treatment at the hospital for the swollen and broken ankle, and the police refused to take his statement regarding the assault, or photograph the ankle for the records. The cold, callous screw’s and the police’s typical uncaring knows no bounds!

During this same sentence Maurice also went on hunger strike for 33 days, in order to get the papers from the HMP Health team which told of his NOT having a brain tumour as the dodgy doctor claimed in his dubious report. Maurice ended his hunger strike after 33 days after succeeding in acquiring the hospital letter showing the results of hospital tests which proved he had no “brain tumour”[which he had been trying to get for over 4 years] but unfortunately once he began taking food again his stomach collapsed and he ended up having parts of his stomach hanging from his rectum – a particularly painful occurrence, which saw him again denied painkillers and hospital treatment. The prison even relented once and took him to the hospital, but whisked him off, back to the prison, before any doctor could see him or any thing could be checked. Unbelievably cruel.  Again he was denied painkillers for weeks on end during the time he needed them most, to cause him maximum pain and distress. He wrote of having to sleep in his wheelchair for 6 days at one point as he was unable to get onto his bed and no screw would help him. Also, in earlier more mobile times during this sentence, whilst apparently undertaking a “citizen’s arrest” upon a screw who obviously needed it, the prison then arrested him for “assault” upon the warder, as Maurice put his hand on the subject’s shoulder as part of the citizen’s arrest. After doing this, he was framed for assault upon the screw and was forced to undertake a kangeroo court hearing – the result of that being  certain “loss of priveleges” deemed upon him as the punishment. Do these characters hail from Hell itself, or were they just dropped on their heads as babies? This writer needs to know. 

Anyway, more importantly Maurice asks for help to retrieve his van, at the Cardiff Crown court location [or wherever the police may have moved it to since 14 Dec. 17] with it’s contents of vital and irreplaceable legal papers in it which need saving. On the 14th December just gone he seemed to have been whisked into court, sentenced, then quickly removed from the court before anyone could arrive at the hearing – I got to the building at 10.50am, and all was done and dusted by then with Maurice in the cells, and thus anyone was denied being given the key to his van, etc., so it could be looked after. One cannot help but think this was a deliberate planned move on behalf of certain Welsh authorities to again cause maximum distress all round. He is denied now getting the van key out to anyone. All expenses will be paid for everything to do with the moving of the van into safety, including travel costs, and the retrieval of his legal papers. I have no driving licence, therefore am of limited use, but if anyone can help Maurice please write to him at M. KIRK, A7306AT, HMP Parc, Heol Hopcyn John, Coity, Bridgend CF35 6AP, or contact me direct. He can be contacted quickly also via the “Emailaprisoner” site – his details: Maurice Kirk, no. A7306AT, at HMP Parc – those are the only details needed to contact him at HMP via that site – or please relay the info to myself and I’ll forward the info and save anyone 40p for the email message which is charged. Letters of complaint regarding treating this 72 year-old citizen like an animal can be sent to the Home Office, or any relavent government rep., or addressed to “The Governor” [or the IMB [Independant Monitoring Board – allegedly there to make sure fairness is received by citizens serving sentences] at HMP Parc, Heol Hopcyn John, Coity, Bridgend CF35 6AP, with reference Maurice Kirk A7306AT.

Finally, he asks for help regarding his plane in Kenya, for sale or to use free until further notice, or transfer to Kenyan registration.

Letters of complaint to the HMP Parc governor, and the IMB also there regarding the appalling treatment meted out to him by characters in the pay of the taxpayer have gone ignored so far, as no acknowledgement from those addressed, or change in Maurice’s situation has been received. Sincere thanks to anyone who can help.

More to come asap…

Received 16 Jan. 2018:

More falsehoods against Maurice in order to punish him unfairly: 

The added writing on the left in green ink below, written by Maurice, from a report whereby MK was reported for being “disrespectful” after being denied his medication yet again, states: “This 2nd paragraph was, I suspect, dictated by another and resembled a Grimm’s fairy tale”

Maurice’s sister writes, 16 Jan. 2018:

“Maurice is in HMP PARC. He is being treated appallingly (this must go viral):

After a month he has been denied his vitally important medicine (Prescribed by both UK GP and French doctor) for his split diaphragm. This makes it impossible for him to move around without huge pains hitting him regularly and not sleeping at all well. He used to use one of the following to alleviate pain: omeprazole or paroxetine and zopiclone. He thinks he has PASD brought on by the fear of injections administered whilst asleep at Caswell Clinic. He made sure this did not happen by sleeping against the door on the floor each night. He also insisted on eating only food brought in by family. He was not going to allow ‘them’ to ‘doctor’ him.

The Crown Court Judge in December stated that she had no authority to report ‘the doctor’ to the GMC. She was also notice that the reason M could not attend the doctor in Birmingham was his gut pain. He called at the Court Office twice to ask them to change the appointment date but nothing happened. 

It is interesting to note that the Parole Board is in trouble for not revealing the ‘evidence’ in Worboys parole hearing. Is the same reason given for not organising Maurice’s due parole hearing when in HMP Swansea.

He has been told that he is still on MAPPA 3 ! Twelve (12) complaint forms within HMP Parc have not been answered or acknowledged. He is only allowed to phone 3 people and not allowed regular access to the Canteen stamps shop. 

He has had notice about his appeal to the Criminal Court of Appeal. The letter was written 11th January and he has just received it, 5 days later. The number is :2017 04 259 B4 JL

thanks

His Sister”

.

To be continued.

Archive continues

MAURICE KIRK: DEFENCE NOTE: “POLICE WITHOLD EVIDENCE” + BLATANT FALSEHOOD USED – 12 Jan. 2018 + archive

.

All the  250+  posts on Maurice Kirk on this site going back to 2011:

https://butlincat.com/?s=maurice+kirk

What happened to and where is Patrick Cullinane?  Maurice Kirk and PC, 2007

FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

NB: DISCLAIMER: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

CAUL GRANT ARRESTED! – AT THAMES MAGISTRATES COURT [BOW] MONDAY 15 Jan. 18

 

From Facebook 14 Jan. 18: – PLEASE SHARE!

Caul Grant 
.

comment:

“Afternoon family and friends. message from Caul, he has been detained wrongly by the police to go court tomorrow morning at Thames magistrate court in Bow 10am. This needs publicity if anyone can be there it would be well Appreciated. Please share!”

To be continued: 

CAUL GRANT + others JAILED + FINED – UPDATE 15 MAY 14

UPDATE: 15 MAY 2014: CAUL GRANT + others JAILED

received:

“Caul Grant got 28 days for contempt of court. Caul Grant and Michael Cohen were also fined £700, other protester Fiona was fined £500, Jackie Fergus was acquitted as no evidence.

The four were in court yesterday for alleged charges related to breaching a police order whilst peacefully protesting on the Zebra crossings outside Royal Courts of injustice last year September 2013. Caul Grant of ‘Campaign for Truth and Justice’ began peacefully protesting after the tragic avoidable death and cover up of his 15 month baby son Prince Grant in a NHS hospital..

His quest for justice led him to become the subject of two decades of persecution and torture involving false imprisonment on previous occasions instigated by the highly corrupt law firm Bindman and Partners who had been sued by Mr. Grant ( Bindmans and Partners are also the part of the very same criminal cartel involved in my case). I don’t have any details as to what happened in court yesterday as i sadly was not there. But am told that Caul has since been taken to Wandsworth Prison..

Once again we see yet another example of the victims/ survivors (peaceful protesters against injustice) being arrested and penalised by either imprisonment or fine, while the actual real guilty parties( serious criminals) are wrongly protected by the state.

Shall update once I know more”

From 24 September 2013:

CAUL GRANT ARRESTED: + THE UTTER CORRUPTION OF SOME JUDGES: THE CAMPAIGN FOR TRUTH + JUSTICE – CAUL GRANT

CAULG

Caul Grant of ‘Campaign For Truth and Justice’ has been arrested today 23 Sept. 13 together with three other people named, Fiona, Jacqui and a scientist African Professor.
All were arrested today for peacefully protesting outside the notoriously corrupt ‘Royal Courts of Justice’. The four have been taken to Charing Cross Police station to be charged!!
Please spread the word on all your social networks!!!
Protests concluded today for the second instalment of the Weekly ‘Empowerment Mondays Protests’ , whereby outraged UK protesters who are also victims of heinous Crimes covered up by the UK courts, have joined forces and were repeatedly crossing the Zebra crossings outside the RCJ to highlight the disgust at the rampant corruption and criminality taking place by corrupt Lawyers and Judges inside British Courts.
Now dubbed ‘Royal Courts Of Injustice’ due to the outrageous scale that members of the British public are being grossly abused, protesters have gathered outside the courts today and held up the traffic to raise awareness of the horrific scale of the court corruption and judicial abuse and cover ups.
The inquest of Mark Duggan concludes this week, you may remember the case as he was the British Black young man whose killing triggered off the start of the London Riots in 2011.
This inquest also taking place within the ‘Royal Court of Injustice’, and the general British public have absolutely no confidence that the truth will be told or that Justice will be done.
UK courts and the entire Judiciary are being run likened to a mafia cartel with Judges blatantly lying on oath and concealing victims vital evidence to act in favour of wealthy criminal bosses, mobsters and those brazenly abusing public offices.
Ruthless uncover abusive tactics as were used against the Lawrence family during their quest for justice after the Racist Murder of their son Stephen Lawrence are also being employed against innocent members of the British public with concrete evidence of crimes being covered up by the Judiciary. With agents and Trolls engaged in smear campaigns to discredit legitimate cases that reveal horrendous crimes and cover ups being concealed within the Judiciary.
In short every possible avenue in which victims can attain justice and redress is being blocked.
Instead of British Courts and the Judiciary addressing cases fairly in accordance with the ‘Rule of Law’ they have now built a fortress based on deceit, fraud and blatant corruption to ensure that no legitimate victim in the British public ever attains Justice within a British court.
This is an absolute outrage and we the British public say.. Enough is Enough!!
For info about Caul Grant and ‘Campaign For Truth and Justice’ (CTJ) see:www.ctj.org.uk
Caul Grant has endured two decades of being abused and tortured for trying to seek justice and have the death of his 15 month old baby son addressed inside a British Court due to a NHS negligence cover up.
Sadly, Mr. Grants case is by no means unique there are regular reports of other shocking cases with victims being abused for seeking justice in the UK up and down the country.
In Mr. Grants efforts to seek justice from a UK court, he has sustained being falsely imprisoned and suffered a series of other horrendous silencing attempts by the notoriously corrupt London law firm named ‘Bindman and Partners’
Please be warned about the corrupt Bindman and Partners law firm as there are many crimes including suspicious deaths connected to this law firm, so warn all your friends and family not to go there!!
Bindman and Partners name has come up again and again in many other disturbing shocking cases whereby innocent members of the British Public with legitimate cases have been grossly targeted and abused and even in some instances murdered in highly sinister horrific ways..
Such crimes against humanity cannot be allowed to continue in the UK without being addressed, therefore we urge everyone to support the UK protests and protestors.
See:www.ctj.org.
For more information on rampant UK court and Judicial corruption perpetrated by the Law Firm Bindmans and other corrupt UK corporations.
see:www.thefarrellreport.net
If you know about or have experienced court / judicial corruption join the efforts to address the abuse taking place by joining the weekly ‘Empowerment Monday protests’ every Monday outside the Royal Courts of Injustice!!
Also Patrick Cullinane another Royal Courts of Injustice victim, shall be starting protests from 1st of October until the 4th of October 2013, please also attend these protests to demand court investigations and reforms!!

INJUSTICE AGAINST ONE IS INJUSTICE AGAINST ALL!!!!

STAND UP FOR OUR RIGHTS IN THE UK!

NO LAW BREAKER CAN BE A LAW ENFORCER!!!

PLEASE MAKE THIS INFO VIRAL TO PROTECT THE ARRESTED PEACEFUL PROTESTORS SAFETY!!!!

Tweet, Blog, Vlog, Rap.. Do whatever you can to share this Breaking News!!!

WE HAVE THE RIGHT AND DUTY TO PROTEST TO STOP THE HORRIFIC CRIMES AND CORRUPTION COVERED UP IN THE UK

RULE OF LAW MUST BE RESTORED IN THE UK!!!!

SO PLEASE MAKE YOUR VOICES HEARD!!!!

Videos of todays Protests and Arrests to follow on shortly!!!

===============================

In November 1994, Mr. Grant retained the services of Bindman & Partners Solicitors to pursue a complaint against King’s College NHS Hospital Trust for negligently giving false information about the circumstances leading up to the death of his 14 month old son. Bindman & Partners advised him in writing, that there was no law in the United Kingdom which gave protection against false advice. Mr. Grant found this very difficult to accept and sought the advice of several other law firms, who all told him Bindman’s were wrong. Mr. Grant tried to have his Legal Aid Certificate transferred to a firm who were prepared to properly represent his interest, but Bindman’s refused to release it. In August 1997 Mr. Grant then issued a writ against Bindman & Partners for several breaches of the Solicitors Code of Conduct. They included a breach of contract, willfully giving false advice and failure to act in the best interest of the client. Bindman & Partners were represented by another firm of Solicitors, Reynolds Porter Chamberlain (RPC). They offered no defence to the claim and sought only to rely on the influence of their friends or families within the Judiciary. The Senior Partner at RPC, Alan Toulson, is the brother of a High Court Judge, Mr. Justice Toulson. Alan Toulson, or his firm, went to his brother and arranged to have Mr. Grant’s claim willfully struck out of Court. RPC also arranged, with Justice Toulson, an unlawful injunction against him contacting Bindman’s directly. The actions of Justice Toulson and his brother, or brother’s law firm, is a direct contravention of Article 6, Section 1 of The European Convention. During the abuse of process and infringement of his rights, Mr. Grant made several complains to Downing Street, Members of Parliament, the media and to Her Majesty the Queen, but no help was forthcoming. In an effort to attract public attention to all what was taking place, he spray painted the windows of the offices of Bindman & Partners. Mr. Grant was subsequently arrested and prosecuted for criminal damage. He pleaded not guilty as a result of circumstances. The following Morning, 13th August 1997, he was brought before a District Judge, Mr. Baker and despite the documented fact that there were no conditions attached to his bail, the Judge remanded him to 4 days in prison. On the 17th August 1997 he was taken back to the same Court before a different Judge, Mr. Johnstone, who stated in Court, he would not become involved in what was taking place and he confirmed that there were no conditions attached to his bail and released him from custody. In June 1998 Mr. Grant was eventually convicted for the allegation of criminal damage. He appealed against the conviction and in July 1998 the conviction was overturned. The Appellate Court presided over by His Honor Judge Inman, accepted his defence of duress of circumstances.
——————————————————————————–

By now Mr. Grant had also received a reply to his complaint from Buckingham Palace, written on behalf of the Queen. It is clear from that letter that the Queen could not intervene directly. However, she instructed that Mr. Grant’s letter of complaint be sent direct to the former Head of the Judiciary, Lord Irvine. The letter from Buckingham Palace also confirmed Lord Irvine’s awareness of his case. Lord Irvine’s failure to act on the issues raised in his complaint allowed the corruption to spread out of control and because he was the Head of the Judiciary Mr. Grant was denied the right to be heard by an impartial, independent Tribunal, the basic principles of fairness. In September 1998 Mr Grant reissued his writ, this time there were four Defendants, Bindman & Partners for reasons already given, the Solicitors Indemnity Fund, the Hospital responsible for subjecting him to mental torture and the Hospital responsible for deliberately over prescribing him antidepressants. Alan Toulson, or his firm, went back to his brother to have Mr. Grant’s writ struck out, again unlawfully. In an effort to break him once and for all, RPC also alleged that Mr. Grant had breached their unlawful injunction. In February 1999 Mr. Justice Toulson conducted a hearing, in Mr. Grant’s absence, without legal representation and without his knowledge, prosecuted by his brother or his brother’s law firm. At the conclusion of that unlawful hearing, Justice Toulson ordered that Mr Grant should go to Prison and serve 6 months for Contempt of Court

——————————————————————————–

CAULG2A14 month old Prince Anthony Grant who died of Dehydation after being left unattended with no fluids whilst in care of Kings College Hospital NHS Trust Sometime in April 1999 Mr. Grant was presented before Mr. Justice Buckley. He ordered that if he agreed to see the Prison Medics he would consider releasing him, but he was afraid and untrusting of his order. Mr. Grant did not then, nor currently, have a mental problem. He had not committed any crime or been convicted for any crime. According to the Judge, his imprisonment was for contempt of Court and did not see or understand what his stage of mind had to do with wanting his release from unlawful imprisonment. Mr. Grant refused to see the Medics and was re-presented on 28th May 1999. He told Mr. Justice Buckley why he had refused and he turned and told Mr. Grant, “Mr. Grant the background of your case is extremely tragic. There are many ways in which you can pursue it, go home to your family” Subsequently Mr. Grant tried to get on with his life. However in February 2000 and May 2001 he was employed in the London Borough of Westminster as a Traffic Warden Supervisor. His responsibilities included the issuing of Penalty Charge Notices (PCN’s) and the supervision of others issuing PCN’s. His employers wanted him to engage and encourage others to engage in activity aimed at targeting motorists in order to increase the number of PCN’s and therefore increase revenue. Mr. Grant refused to deliberately target unsuspecting drivers and refused to encourage his team members to do the same. This led to his suspension, and despite the employers’ Lawyers advising them to allow him back to work; dismissed him from employment. As a direct result of the United Kingdom’s failure to afford him the protection of Law, he was unable to take the employers to Court for unfair dismissal. At the time, he have three children within his current relationship and three from a previous marriage, which was destroyed by the State. Mr. Grant’s persecution by the United Kingdom impacted upon his ability to lawfully earn a living which would afford him the dignity to do the best he can towards the welfare of his children. It was at this point Mr. Grant decided that the UK Authorities cannot deny him all protection of Law and still seek to punish him by the same Law. Rebellion was a last recourse against the flagrant abuse, total disregard and contempt of the Rule of Law by the UK and its Judicial Authorities. In fact the United Kingdom has ignored citations from its own Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith, who quoted Justice Brandeis of the United States of America who said, over 50 years ago: “In a Government of Laws, existence of the Government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the Law scrupulously. Government is the potent omnipresent teacher. For good or ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. If the Government becomes a Lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for the Law and invites every man to become a Law unto himself, it invites anarchy”.

see: http://www.youtube.com/jetblakink
======================================
The Musa Case – 7 children gone, the parents imprisoned for 7 years wrongly = http://truth-wars.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=2333.0

th_a8jpg2aba

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

OUTRAGEOUS: JUSTICE FOR NIKKI Petition: attacked by 3 Asian muslim men, police do nothing!! VIDEO

Tommy Robinson: #JUSTICEFORNIKKI

 

Published on Nov 28, 2017

 
 
Tommy Robinson of TheRebel.media reports: On October 31st, Nikki Hurst, from Batley, U.K., was assaulted by three Muslim men in a racially motivated attack. Batley’s Police Inspector Mohammed Rauf doesn’t appear to be planning to investigate. Tell Inspector Rauf that we want justice for Nikki, by SIGNING OUR PETITION: http://www.JusticeForNikki.com 
Nikki and I will personally deliver your signatures to Inspector Rauf. And we won’t stop fighting until these racist attackers are brought to justice. http://www.JusticeForNikki.com

JUSTICE FOR NIKKI HURST

In the early morning hours of October 31st, Nikki Hurst was walking in Batley, UK, when three Muslim men approached her and asked for a light. When she told them she didn’t have one, they launched into a tirade of verbal abuse, calling her a “gori slag” – a derogatory name often used by Muslims for white girls.


The three men then grabbed Nikki, smashed her face into a stone wall, and ran away. She regained consciousness alone, some 30 minutes later, with a large wound on her forehead. She suffered serious facial injuries that have left permanent scars.

But despite this all happening one month ago, Nikki says the police have still not taken her statement. Desperate for justice, Nikki posted photographs of her injuries online – only for the police to advise her that she could potentially incite riots by publishing her story.

Batley’s Police Inspector Mohammed Rauf doesn’t appear to be planning to investigate this racist attack. Nikki knows the assailants go to a local school, and she can even tell the police what class they are in thanks to their school uniforms. But still, nothing has been done.

We demand justice. Tell Batley Police Inspector Mohammed Rauf that we want justice for Nikki, by signing our petition now.

Then we’ll go back to Batley, with Nikki, and personally deliver your signatures to Inspector Rauf. And we won’t stop fighting until these racist attackers are brought to justice.

Thank you,
Tommy Robinson

The Petition

Batley Police Inspector Mohammed Rauf must investigate the assault against Nikki Hurst.

Will you sign? https://uk.therebel.media/justicefornikki

related: 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

THE CAROL WOODS COVERUP: SHOCKING House and Court Corruption 14 Jan. 18 + archive

Some Background to the targeting of Carol Woods:

Carol Woods = “It is a highly complex matter which the police organise where they try to make me someone I am not. They have in fact tried to invent me as the reverse of myself using numerous characters, including “neighbours” who live alongside myself, and others elsewhere – the entire situations going back years. I find things out because I am not stupid. See my original w’blowing blog York LGO Blog re Lancashire CC   http://criticalreader2006.blogspot.ae/ you will see why I am hounded by lowlife RECRUITED to do that by the Gestapo.
More is described here:   “Harassment as punishment for whistle-blowing: Lancashire” http://criticalreader17.blogspot.ae/2017/02/harassment-as-punishment-for-whistle.html.

————————————————————————–

HOUSE AND COURT CORRUPTION [Alice in Wonderland aka Lancashire] 09 Jan. 2018

carol woods 9 Jan

to policing.minis., privateoffice.., look.north, contact, privateoffice, bae146, me, farront, ministers, andy.rhodes, david.lidingto., lep.newsdesk, lancashire, richard.little., tim.jacques, telegraphedito., david.gauke.mp, sajid.javid.mp, customerinvest., secofstate, susan.acland-h., johnsonb, richard.bayly, editor

Alice laughed. “There’s no use trying”, she said. “One can’t believe impossible things”.
“I daresay you haven’t had much practice”, said the Queen. “When I was your age, I always did it half an hour a day. Why sometimes, I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast”.

Dear Sirs
I sent this list of documents on 8 12 18 again in regard to MY HOUSE and COURT CORRUPTION ETC from 2010. On 9th the lunatics were pretending 2010 was NOW and had the Gestapo cruise by me where I sat in my car then alighting to shop in the store near- by. In the store they had the usual sleazy with his lap top and note book who was to pretend he met with me. I took his photo: I had been shopping; I have no idea what he had been doing. Back at my car the Gestapo were there again, they CONFIRM FICTION is FACT. Also there was a council sleazy sitting parked (who has since followed me into the local library) and the INTENT is to try to claim NOW is Jan 2010 and I am found “living in the library” so NEED REHOUSING! I did not have my car in 2010 aside from the rest of the lunacy. The council troll sits and is PAID to do NOTHING BUT PRETEND. In the library to account for all the thugs they have used to be JACKSON’s son she from 26 Fell View who thinks she is me and was provided with thugs with auburn hair or nearly so she could claim it was proof she was me, the Gestapo had thrown all that together and produced a male with auburn hair and BEARD and he to stalk and shout into his phone as MR Carol Woods and with a bit of DYED BLUE HAIR. Why? Because the former friend turned THIEF and worse DIANA GARNER had a blue bit dyed in to her hair. Thus they have made Garner into a male with a beard now! I told you I couldn’t make this up. So, I am sending this again. Wait to see what else I will be sending out.
I have deleted the added data from yesterday as you all have that.

Lancaster CPS Rosemary Lane 8 Feb 2010 Re: Hearing scheduled for 18 and 19 March Preston Magistrates Court Carol Woods and Anna Judith Pereles, Tracey Kennedy, after 14 January 2010 hearing Lancaster Magistrates Court. (At the time of faxing this I, CW was unaware that I had impersonated a Mrs Carole Woods on 14 Jan in Lancaster. This list was faxed at least 3 times and hand delivered including to CPS HQ. No responses, no document possibly because the case was nothing to do with me, CW Ms.)

Dear Sirs
As indicated at the above hearing I list here the documents I wish to see under the advance disclosure: all relevant for the course of justice to flow and in fairness for all.

1. Copy of ‘instruction’ from James Richard Duckworth “Trustee” in “bankruptcy” to close my Furness Building Society Account and send the cheque of over £1,000.00 to me.

2.Copy of any documents pertaining to a hearing said to have been in Liverpool Magistrates Court on 23 October 2008 with a District Judge Lomax presiding and with me in that court when I have never been in any court at all.

3.Copies of anything after that ‘hearing’ which instructed Peter Gardner of Orbis St Helen’s to remove all my ground floor double glazed windows on 27 October 2008 at Cherry Trees Sunnyside Lane LA1 5ED.

4.Instruction to Michael Short near neighbour at that address which indicated that he should watch my movements after5 September 2008 while I lived in my home, Cherry Trees.

5. The details of any ‘mortgage’ I was said to have taken on my house Cherry Trees which is what Mr short said was the issue re his watching of me, i.e. I hadn’t paid my mortgage.

6. Copies of all signed documents between AJ Pereles and her solicitor acting in ‘purchase’ of Cherry Trees.

7. Copies of anything showing that Gail Capstick of 57 Ingleborough Drive Lancaster owned my house, Cherry Trees at any time including from the time known as Beechroyd.

8. Copies of all David Carter Cumbria Properties documents re who placed my house for sale with his agency in December 2008.

9. The names of the ‘management group’ said by AJ Pereles to be ‘selling’ my house and from whom she apparently ‘bought’ it.

10. The social work qualifications of Gail Capstick as per above.

11. All documents related to Janet Woodall and her suggestion that she was my mental health social worker address: 11 Sullom View Garstang Near Preston.

12. The registration documents pertaining to 7-9 Swan Street Longtown Cumbria being anything other than an ordinary dwelling house owned by Janet Woodall associate Andrew Chambers.

13. The missing witness statements from 27 Dec 09 including the one dated 3 Dec 09 written by Ian Young of Lancashire County Council, typed in small type along with the typed version of Ian Reader’s, your witness.

14. Copy of documents shown to me on 27 Dec 09 in Lancaster police station: Notice dated 5 Sept 2009, an email said to have been sent by me to the Adult College in Lancaster and an unsigned letter ditto. According to the CPS (Ms Griffith) the documents are in Lancaster police station.

15. Instruction to the Marsden Building Society to deny me the residue of wages paid into the joint account I hold there with one of my daughters being the first named holder of the Aquarious Saver Account.

16. Any social work records including travel expenses, file notes, meetings etc from Janet Woodall which record that she was my social worker and not my long standing friend.

17. The documents held in Lancaster Revenues Dept which alerted the council to my ‘Abandoning’ of my home on 27 Oct 2008 and any which relate to an Andrew Halliday purchasing my house as mortgagee.

18. The appointment of the “Trustee” in the bankruptcy which ‘bankruptcy’ was also apparently why I ‘abandoned’ my house and contents worth over £400.000.00.

19. Any document I have ever signed related to any “bankruptcy”.

20. Copies of medical qualifications of A J Pereles, Ian Reader, Sergeant Martin and CSO Griffiths.

21. Any bank details from any bank/building society showing any movement of monies re any sale of my house Cherry Trees formerly known as Beechroyd. (The Marsden are aware that only about £760.00 should be held in that joint account: I have no other.)

22. Documents showing what investigation was carried out after I reported that I had been impersonated in Liverpool Magistrates Court on 23 October 2008 which report I faxed and sent via email on 22 July 2009.

23. The social work records from Ayrshire Social Services, Scotland which show that Tina Pazzano (also known as Maria Haswell) was my social worker and not my friend after her non- existent trip to Canada in mid- January 2010.

24. The social work qualifications and all related records made up in my name of/by Bruce Pilling said to be owner of 7-9 Swan Street Longtown when he was not. Andrew Chambers was the owner. Janet Woodall of Garstang can help with that.

25. Can I add that I have the sign from my house which caused the criminal damage? It was a cheap plastic sign and while I intended to leave it, there was no one in the house when I removed it to photograph the damage it had caused to my gate post. I kept it so that it would not be stolen or snapped or damaged in any way should it be found by someone passing.

26. I have written to Preston Magistrates Court asking that John Robinson with his substantial interest (from 2003 over years) be removed from any dealings in the hearing and that Judge Ward (named apparently) also has an interest and will need to be replaced. It is also a waste of public monies transferring the case as Lancaster Magistrates could deal with this further, that court has its own District Judge. 27. I have asked by letter that parties appear as witnesses but have received no replies: Inspector Edmunds Lancaster police has also ignored my request yet he was present on 14 Jan 2010.

Signed by me, Carol Woods Ms before realising that case papers and police tapes were nothing to do with me. Possibly that was why this was ignored at each hand delivery and fax?
Carol Woods Ms now at 28 Fell View LA2 9RP under duress.

MUST SEE!: 

The Carol Woods Coverup: OUTRAGEOUS: Police Bribery / court corruption / M. Todd’s murder 08 Jan. 2018 + archive

.

See the entire archive here on Carol Woods from Febuary 2016:

https://butlincat.com/?s=carol+woods

Some Background to the targeting of Carol Woods:

Carol Woods = “It is a highly complex matter which the police organise where they try to make me someone I am not. They have in fact tried to invent me as the reverse of myself using numerous characters, including “neighbours” who live alongside myself, and others elsewhere – the entire situations going back years. I find things out because I am not stupid”.

WHY is Carol Woods targeted? See her original w’blowing blog York LGO Blog re Lancashire CC   http://criticalreader2006.blogspot.ae/ – “you will see why I am hounded by lowlife RECRUITED to do that by the Gestapo.”.

More is described here:   “Harassment as punishment for whistle-blowing: Lancashire” http://criticalreader17.blogspot.ae/2017/02/harassment-as-punishment-for-whistle.html.

Apart from numerous and longstanding ID frauds [where goods and other services have been obtained by dubious “neighbours” in her locale using Carol Wood’s ID, much obtained via her stolen mail – something Royal Mail has been notified about an infinite amount of times, with no proper response at all] and along with many other serious crimes enacted in her name [see the list below in the section entitled “Some Background, below] Carol Woods is stalked daily by her neighbours who are, it is very strongly alleged, employed by the local police and other factions of Lancs. county council. Ms. Woods is particularly targeted at the library which she has to use for the use of the computers therein, as having computers and phones etc. at her home has proven futile because of them being hacked by the same individuals who hack the library computers whenever she uses them. These unemployed, mostly male yobs, in the pay of the police etc. to surveille Ms. Woods [it is very strongly alleged], openly sit alongside her in the library, mobile phones in their hands while they hack the computer Ms. Woods is using, scanning and interfering with whichever emails to and from Ms. Woods they see fit, amongst other electronic interference.

What is particularly appalling also is that – apart from the Royal Mail letters being deliberately misdelivered to criminal neighbours etc. – so many serious crimes committed against Ms. Woods have been refused being reported for years now, to the police and other government agencies, including the IPCC who do nothing when told about complaints involving Lancs. police. Apart from Ms. Woods continually contacting police departments and politicians and other government agencies, other supporters have contacted UK Government departments regarding the serious crimes Ms. Woods is victim of, I personally have approached 3 different chief constables of 3 different police forces to no avail, and the IPCC have been complained to regarding this lack of duty by police employees – the IPCC merely passing my concerns back to the force allegedly behind the bulk of so many of the very strongly alleged crimes – Lancs. police. Contacting these UK Government departments has proven a complete waste of time, such is the coverup involved to do with so much of what is very strongly alleged concerning Ms. Carol Woods.

The posts and updates from Ms. Woods on this site alone detail this harassment from Ms. Woods neighbours along with detailing many of the numerous crimes committed since Febuary 2016 when Ms. Woods was forcibly detained for no reason other than to silence her in a mental unit, for the 5th time. As there were no proper grounds for Ms. Woods to be held in the mental unit, she was released after protests were made. This enforced kidnapping of Ms. Woods was the 5th time such a kidnapping had occurred to Ms. Woods because of the input by certain authorities who completely shirk their responsibilities and cover up serious crime – eg. employing and paying from the public purse criminals who flout the law by  stalking Ms. Woods almost daily, and every time Ms. Woods leaves her abode, and also enabling them to partake in numerous ID frauds completely outside of the law, and much more – the reporting of numerous DWP benefit frauds and connected to the DWP fraud department, and to the banks – Barclays and Santander – who had numerous accounts in false names to launder the DWP monies gained illegally, proving a complete waste of time also.

Some more background:

In the latest posts and in the archive linked, Carol  goes into greater detail regarding what she is having to experience from those around her, all with, it seems, the full cooperation and assistance of the local authorities who command the numerous crimes and the actions of the numerous lowlife stalkers she is surrounded by.  Not only do these nightmare neighbours she is surrounded by steal her landline telephone and internet delivery lines running into her house, and misuse it on an almost daily basis by the lines being previously diverted to their more than likely ramshackle homes, they also steal her electricity too when they can [when Carol switches it on], and much more. Carol can hear her neighbours testing their electricity sockets after she has turned her power on from the main switch in her home. For this very reason her electricity supply is having to be almost permanently switched off for fear of it being hacked by these criminal neighbours, she lives by candlelight and she has had to live electricity free in her home for years because of these lowlives’ thieving alongside her home – many of them doting and ageing pensioners who steal her services because they can and do not get criminally charged with anything – courtesy of the fake authoritarian figures in place who should be in prison rather than be sitting pretty in a government office somewhere, local or otherwise. Fake IDs used by so many – if not all – of Carol’s criminal neighbours pay for many things through fake bank accounts, the money all ultimately coming from the UK taxpayer – the general public, as are the new cars given as rewards to certain neighbours paid for the same way – the road tax etc for these cars also paid for by the UK public, as are the numerous “Blue Badge” schemes many of these cars are concessioned with – all registered via false details but paid for out of the public purse. Authorities do nothing when told about these scams – how much longer can these outright crimes continue?

Regarding the internet and phone lines running into her abode: Carol even witnessed the rewiring of such to cater for her neighbours criminal thieving when she came back home from being out one day – the lines being rearranged and diverted into her loft where the neighbour’s connections take place, and thus the ability for these thieves to steal her services. A bit of  detail about this stealing of Carol’s services – when Carol came back from being out one day, she noticed an ironing board, of all things, leaning against a wall in one of her rooms which wasn’t there before she’d gone out. On moving the ironing board, there on the wall was – crudely written in biro or whatever – the electrician or whoever’s drawing for the rewiring of the phone + internet lines being diverted into her loft – for the use of the thieving neighbours as already described. This is why, when out on later outings to wherever, tell-tale ironing boards would be left deliberately en route – leaning against walls or whatever – for Carol not to miss. Such is the cruelty of the minds involved in this entire gangstalking scenario CW is having and has had to put up with for so many years. Does any authority  do anything about any of this stealing of her phone or internet services when they’re notified? No they don’t – the same way as the CEO of Royal Mail ignores all notifications to him regarding misdeliveries of CW’s mail to assorted neighbours [see earlier posts on this]. Other authorities also contemptuously ignore other notifications of gross irregularities / crimes sent to them. Why? Go figure. Semantic battles with the R. Mail’s current CEO proved pointless when trying to report the numerous and longstanding deliberate misdeliveries of mail to the neighbours who give CW such a hard time. As for these loutish neighbours and their hostilities, it’s hard to argue, for example, when someone wearing a police officer’s uniform making out they’re a police officer is intimidating one and breathing down one’s neck giving one preposterous orders to harass and hurt a fellow citizen – but harass and hurt they do, putting aside any semblance of conscience or, dare I say it – guilt. Perhaps the gift of a new car – or two – paid for by the UK taxpayers – eases their conscience and helps these sad characters turn the other cheek and commit serious crime and also stalk so inhumanly someone who devoted her entire working life in service to others – as Carol has – trying to help children especially. These lowlives – and the lowlives controlling all the conspiracies against Carol Woods – have much to answer for, and let’s hope that day comes soon when they get their comeuppance – noone likes a corrupt traitor, especially those who are in the positions they’re in, whose sky-high wages are paid by the UK taxpayer, and its funny how things turn around and come back ten times worse for those perpetrating these obscenities. But that’s noone’s problem but theirs.

It is completely unjust and as outrageous and unfair that I am refused reporting – by 3 separate police forces – serious crimes, as correspondence, or rather ignored correspondences to these 3 police forces, would show [UPDATE 24 JUNE 17 – a few days ago – at 20.53BST on the evening of Saturday 17 June, to be exact, 2 Dorset officers knocked on my door without any forewarning [after my now numerous messages to the Chief Constable]and although unprepared, I duly gave them such info as I could regarding the huge number of crimes listed so far as detailed by and committed against CW. After 50 minutes, one of the officers promised me that “Lancs. police would be got in touch with, with a view for them to contact CW”. Of course I immediately protested that, allegedly, the Lancs. police were one of the very parties behind this series of numerous ongoing crimes, and to do such would be a waste of time. Note that this has been tried before when Lancs. police have been told of certain crimes pertaining to CW by CW, and nothing has been done at all. Nevertheless, this was all I could expect, apparently. Who knows if anything was passed on to Lancs. police, and even if it was, will anything be done about anything? It is now weeks since Dorset police were informed that night of 17 June, and Ms. Woods harassment continues unabated – so the evidence points to the fact that nothing has been done regarding what was reported to those 2 Dorset police officers]. If one complains to higher authorities about this completely unacceptable situation, I would guess that the targeting I am experiencing almost on a daily basis – whenever I go out – would escalate to an unacceptable level, causing me to fear for my very own life. That is why also the updates from CW have been drastically curtailed here. So be it. William Burroughs, the great author, once said that if a person didn’t want to catch malaria, one shouldn’t go to an area where malaria is rife. I seemed to have stumbled into something similar. So be that also…

The question has been asked: “why would the “Powers That Be” target someone such as Carol Woods for so long [since 2006], involving so many perpetrators, committing so many serious crimes, funded by the public and local council taxpayers?”.

Carol Woods is a 63 years old former Lancashire County Council Level 3 Social Worker and Child Protection Officer [who used to train social workers] and a former Probation Officer, amongst many other things. Perhaps the appalling and chronic targeting she has no choice but to put up with 24/7 is because she reported numerous seriously grave irregularities she discovered, including child abuse, when being employed by Lancashire county council, and when one realises that the very controllers of the targeting and stalking Carol is forced to endure are, very probably, very closely connected to the same departments and personnel who are described in the links above and the “IMPORTANT VIDEOS” shown below, which detail what was discovered when Carol worked as a Child Protection officer in Lancashire, then it should not be hard to understand these hostilities enacted against her. Put it this way: the Welsh scientist, weapons expert and authority on biological warfare, employed by the British Ministry of Defence David Kelly was supposed to have leaked serious information to the detriment of the PTB at the time – look what happened to him. Now, Carol is no weapons expert, but one doesn’t have to be one to upset the proverbial apple cart bigtime. And anyway, we are told there have been assassination attempts upon her life too – quite a few in fact, including ramming her car at speed, on a main road, by perpetrators unknown…well, almost unknown.

And why is there an illegal tracking device installed in Ms. Woods car – put there, apparently – by Lancs. police? The Chief Constable of Lancashire has been written to so many times about so many serious matters with no response it’s quite remarkable. Another 2 chief constables have been written to asking can serious crime be reported to their forces also with no response whatsoever, and I have tried on more than one occasion to notify my local police about serious crime at my local central police station to be totally ignored every visit, which is just another public scandal!

Many more serious crimes and misdemeanours committed against Ms. Woods are all completely ignored by whichever UK government agency one tries to take anything to, including:

treason,

many murder attempts upon Carol,

impersonation, ID frauds,

person[s] impersonating police officers in official government hearings, [or hearing[s]  purporting to be official],

Royal Mail frauds,

monetary frauds involving: dubious bank accounts at numerous high street banks, the DWP, Social Security, town council[s] and other agencies,

illegal tracking of motor vehicle via GPS device [or similar],

a high number of motor vehicle “Blue Badge” [UK HM Government concession] frauds,

regular physical harassment / mental torture upon a person [aka “gangstalking”],

telephone / Internet Broadband  / electricity supply fraud,

wrongful arrest,

wrongful kidnapping[s] / incarceration[s] in UK HM Government units, police station[s], HM Prison[s] etc.,

home burglaries, car vandalism going uninvestigated by local police [see 

– many other instances of serious crime and illegal activity exist, and many acts contravening not only the Data Protection Act 1998, but also the contravention of articles pertaining to the European Commission of Human Rights [particularly Article 8].

What is going on is maybe unbelievable, and at times complicated, but that is surely deliberate and part of this outrageous targeting of a law-abiding citizen  – a lone female – who dared to report serious irregularities she found during her employment as a Level 3 social worker and Child Protection Officer. As a result, apart from the crimes committed against her as described, her house and contents with a value of £400,000+ was stolen from her, and her employment tribunal award of £50,000 found its way to someone who conspired against her who fraudulently took Carol Wood’s ID. Other serious crimes exist and continue to  this very day…

IMPORTANT VIDEOS

 1] PLAYLIST [3 videos]: EXPOSING FAKE SOCIAL WORKERS ETC. 06 Febuary 2016

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCT5hwoao38ThHG5Y6q3GSp_hsTwMK2UD

2] Please listen to this vital radio show interview with Ms. Woods from the 12 March 2016

http://www.mixcloud.com/TheFreedomTalkRadioNetwork/lancashire-greater-manchester-harrow-councils-cops-crime-coruption-carol-woods-whistleblower/

3] CAROL WOODS WHISTLEBLOWER ON RADIO lancashire police corruption county council 06 Febuary 2016

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/freedomtalkradioscotland/2016/02/21/andys-sunday-night-show-with-guest

4] CRIMINAL BRITAIN

 SriLankerC 24 April 2016

5] Interview by torquaytalkeytv  31 March 16

6] Carol Woods Social Worker Unlawfully Incarcerated In Psychiatric Gulag  https://youtu.be/-sMukHhkl4o   – 16 April 2016 by  GeorgeGreekTrucker

FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

NB: DISCLAIMER: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

DANIEL MORGAN UNSOLVED MURDER: “UNTOLD” – FULL PODCASTS + UPDATES – VIDEO

 The Death of Daniel Morgan thefrockdoctrine

 Published on Nov 25, 2011 – A BBC documentary about the unsolved murder of Private Investigator Daniel Morgan. The rotten core of News International’s business in the UK comes under scrutiny. The first ten minutes are an outline of Daniel Morgan’s early life and family. Then the second half of the documentary outlines the possible connection between The News of The World, News International and police corruption in the cover up of Daniel’s murder.

.

Listen to entire 2 season podcasts:

rebecca_logo_04

Untold: The Daniel Morgan Murder Exposed
Alastair Morgan and Peter Jukes
(Blink Publishing, hardback £14.99)
Reviewed by Paddy French

♦♦♦

ONE OF the reasons why the 1987 murder of Daniel Morgan has not been properly covered by Britain’s national media is the fact he was part-Welsh.

After nearly two decades involved in this story, I’m convinced Daniel’s Welsh background is a significant factor.

His father John — a native Welsh-speaker from Pontardawe — was wounded and captured at Arnhem in World War 2.

After the war he was commissioned a captain and posted to Singapore.

There he met Isobel and their two sons, Alastair and Daniel, were born in the British colony.

Daniel was premature and there were problems with one of his legs.

John Morgan resigned his commission to bring him back for treatment in the newly-created NHS.

The family lived for many years in Llanfrechfa near Cwmbran.

John, who had worked as a coalminer on his return from Singapore, died of emphysema at 41.

Daniel didn’t reach that age.

He was just 37 when he was axed to death in the car park of a south London pub.

The private investigator was married with two small children.

The prime suspect has always been Daniel’s business partner, Jonathan Rees.

One of the Scotland Yard detectives who investigated the murder, sergeant Sid Fillery, was kicked off the inquiry when it emerged he was a close friend of Rees.

Within a year Fillery retired — and stepped into the dead man’s shoes as Rees’ new partner.

Both were finally charged in 2008 — Rees with the murder, Fillery with attempting to pervert the course of justice.

The case collapsed.

For three decades the scandal was under-reported, especially in the broadcast media.

Just compare the hours of television devoted to another south London murder — that of the black teenager Stephen Lawrence.

One reason for this, I’m convinced, is Daniel’s Welsh connections.

The evidence is compelling: between 1987 and 2004 the only serious television documentaries on the murder were made by the Welsh current affairs strand, Wales This Week.

England — and especially London — has always had a problem with the Welsh.

It’s hard to put your finger on what it is exactly.

Partly, it seems to be indifference — “they’re not the same as us and some of them even talk another (foreign) language” sort of attitude.

FINAL BOOK JACKET

 

For some, though, there’s an active dislike of the Welsh — captured in the saying: “Taffy is a Welshman, Taffy is a thief.”

By the time I joined Wales This Week in 1999, the series had already made several programmes on the murder.

I picked up the baton and went on to make several more programmes.

In 2004 I helped persuade our sister series at ITV London to carry out a joint investigation into the murder — the first time an English broadcaster had taken any interest.

I got to know — and admire — Alastair Morgan and his partner, BBC journalist Kirsteen Knight, for their relentless dedication to securing justice for Daniel.

They’re ordinary people who have dedicated their lives to a single cause at an unimaginable cost.

The results, though, have been extraordinary …

♦♦♦

THE BOOK published today is the fusion of two projects.

For many years Alastair has been writing a book on the saga but there never seemed to be a natural end.

For example, the independent inquiry into the murder commissioned by Theresa May in 2013 — and chaired by Baroness Nuala O’Loan — has yet to publish its report.

Then author, screenwriter and playwright Peter Jukes became interested in the murder as a result of his research into the hacking scandal.

Jukes had chalked up a first with his crowd-funded live-tweeting of the dramatic Old Bailey trial of Andy Coulson and Rebekah Brooks in 2014.

When he realised the prime suspect in the Daniel Morgan murder case, Jonathan Rees, was also a major player in supplying illegal information to the News of the World, he was hooked.

The result is the award-winning Untold podcast — co-produced with Deeivya Meir — which has attracted more than 4 million listeners around the world.

That success — it was iTunes Best Podcast of 2016 — persuaded Peter Jukes and Alastair Morgan that a book was timely.

The result is a forensic account of a scandal that has tarnished the reputation of Scotland Yard, added another sorry episode to the history of the Murdoch press – and shamed the establishment into action.

It reads like pulp fiction — a dark tale of bent cops, murderous criminals,
unscrupulous hacks, self-serving police chiefs and devious politicians.

But it’s all true.

In nearly 400 pages, the book charts the unfolding scandal with Alastair — and his partner Kirsteen Knight — telling the chilling story from their point of view

Peter Jukes takes up the narrative between the sections of their personal testimony.

It’s a format that works well: the style is crisp and the result is an important book about the interaction between organised crime, corrupt police and illegal journalism.

Of course, some of the story still remains untold — after thirty years of twists and turns, it’s clear there’s more to come.

One area, for example, that has never been explored is the role of freemasonry.

Rees and Fillery were masons yet virtually nothing is known about their masonic connections.

The only criticism I have of Untold is the lack of an index — it means the book cannot become the work of reference it deserves to be.

Hopefully, the updated edition promised after the report of the Daniel Morgan Inquiry Panel is published, will add one.

♦♦♦

NOTES
1
The sister website to Rebecca — Press Gang — has reported extensively on the murder. See the Daniel Morgan page for more information.

♦♦♦

rebecca_logo_04

DONATIONS

If you want to make a contribution towards the work of Rebecca, just click on the DONATE button.

Donate Button with Credit Cards

CORRECTIONS

Please let us know if there are any mistakes in this article — they’ll be corrected as soon as possible.

RIGHT OF REPLY  

If you have been mentioned in this article and disagree with it, please let us have your comments. Provided your response is not defamatory we’ll add it to the article.

Listen to entire 2 season podcasts:

DANIEL MORGAN AXE MURDER BY FREEMASON COPS intmensorg


DANIEL MORGAN AXE MURDER CONNECTED TO MURDOCH MAFIA HACKING SCANDAL  

intmensorg Published on Aug 18, 2011 http://www.intmensorg.com

 

.  

EXCERPTS:

Episode 7   COVER STORIES

http://www.untoldmurder.com/eps/2016/7/12/7-cover-stories

Going undercover into the Number One Corrupt Detective Agency during its heyday as the centre of the dark arts.

8    WATCHING THE DETECTIVES

http://www.untoldmurder.com/eps/2016/7/21/8-watching-the-detectives

The Guardian newspaper is targeted by senior officers, while the lead detective in the fourth murder inquiry finds his family is in the firing line.

9  THE GOLDEN THREAD  

http://www.untoldmurder.com/eps?category=Ninth%20Episode

While News of the World try to derail the fifth murder inquiry, a series of protected witnesses provide a detailed picture of the conspiracy to kill Daniel.

10   CARRYING THE BURDEN

http://www.untoldmurder.com/eps?category=Tenth%20Episode


The longest pre trial hearings in British history are soon followed by one of the biggest scandals. But how are Daniel Morgan and phone hacking connected? 

Listen to entire 2 season podcasts:

———————————————————————————

More:


 Rupert Murdoch c/o The News Building
News UK,
1 London Bridge Street,
SE1 9GF

10th March 2015

 

Dear Mr Murdoch

 

The Daniel Morgan Independent Panel and News UK

I write on behalf of my family in connection with the murder of my brother Daniel Morgan on 10th March 1987.

I am sure you will be aware of the history of this matter culminating in the decision by the Home Secretary in May 2013 to appoint an independent panel to look into the many questions arising from the murder.

To remind you, Daniel was a private investigator who was brutally axed to death in the car park of a pub in south-east London. Despite five police investigations, nobody has ever stood trial for his murder. In March 2011, the prosecution of five men, including a former police officer, collapsed at the Old Bailey after police failures in the disclosure of evidence. Following the collapse of the prosecution, the Metropolitan Police admitted that the first inquiry into Daniel’s murder had been “tainted by police corruption”, and that they were responsible for a repeated failure to confront that corruption over the subsequent decades. We have reason to believe that the police criminality in and around the murder extends to the highest echelon of the Metropolitan Police.

You will also be aware of evidence that emerged during the Leveson Inquiry concerning surveillance that was carried out by employees of News International in July 2002 on the police officer responsible for the fourth investigation into Daniel’s murder. We understand that several NI employees were involved in setting up this surveillance, two of whom (Glenn Mulcaire and Greg Miskiw) have since been convicted of unrelated criminal offences. Understandably, we find it difficult to believe the reasons put forward by NI at the Leveson Inquiry for this surveillance – namely that the police officer was suspected of having an affair with a Crimewatch presenter with whom he had appeared on the programme to provide details of the case. My understanding is that a simple Google search would have revealed that he had been married to the woman concerned for several years and they had two children together.

I’m quite sure too that you’re aware of the long-standing commercial relationships between persons suspected of my brother’s murder and the persons involved in setting up the surveillance as named above as well as three other senior NI executives: Andy Coulson, Alex Marunchak and Mazher Mahmood.

In all the circumstances – including the corruption at the heart of the first investigation into my brother’s murder as admitted by the Metropolitan Police – you must understand that the activities of these NI journalists and executives have caused us enormous concern. This has been exacerbated as we have learned about their close links with senior police officers overseeing investigations into Daniel’s murder.

The work of the Daniel Morgan Independent Panel is almost entirely dependent on disclosure and I am appealing to you today – on the 28th anniversary of my brother’s murder – to ensure that News Corporation discloses all relevant material in confidence to the Panel.

Daniel’s murder, the police corruption and the ensuing years of failed investigations have been agony for the whole family. Daniel’s children have grown up without a father and my mother is now 86 years old. We need to know the truth about what happened to Daniel and why. You are in a unique position to help us finally lay Daniel to rest.

We feel that information released should include:

• News International emails deleted in 2010, but reconstructed in seven ‘datapools’ by the software company Stroz Freidberg, and available for search on the Nomad system;
• Any relevant News International paperwork, formerly stored at the Crown archives; and
• The results of any internal investigations, such as the interviews carried out by lawyers from Linklaters in 2011-2012.

Finally, I would also ask you to urge any of your employees or former employees who have information about the murder or activities of Southern Investigations to contact the panel.

I look forward to hearing from you with your positive response to this letter.

Yours sincerely

Alastair MorganNote: Today’s Press Release is here.


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

MAURICE KIRK: DEFENCE NOTE: “POLICE WITHOLD EVIDENCE” + BLATANT FALSEHOOD USED – 12 Jan. 2018 + archive

Received 10 Jan. 2018:

Regarding this former state employed doctor TW with his friends in high policing roles back then and his totally false “report” stating MK had a “brain tumour” and was a “danger to himself and society” and should therefore be locked away indefinately in a closed mental unit [eg. Ashworth High Security unit, or Broadmoor], does the fact that this character left the medical practices industry shortly after Maurice’s court acquittal before the authorities could eject him from the same not speak for itself? Note also this dubious doctor was not even qualified to make such a medical report, nor could he get fellow doctors to co-sign his report as is required by law, regarding his report of a brain tumour that proved later not to exist in the first place, as proper NHS tests proved finally 4 years later – the paperwork for which MK received finally from the HMP doctor after doing 33 days on hunger strike in 2013 whilst serving another highly questionable sentence [see: 5 SEPT: MAURICE KIRK: DOLMANS SOLICITORS, GMC WILL NOT ERASE FALSE REPORT ABOUT NON-EXISTENT “BRAIN TUMOUR”]  

There is much more to all this that cannot be written of here!

This letter received tells of blatant lies used against him:

 

 

“Defence” note: 

MAURICE KIRK: PRISON STILL DENIES BASIC RIGHTS, + SERIOUS SENTENCING HEARING IRREGULARITIES – 05 Jan. 18 + archive

Communications received from Maurice Kirk today 5 Jan 18 not only tell of the illegal denial of his basic rights whilst serving a term of imprisonment, but also the blatant miscarriages of justice that occurred at his sentencing hearing on the 14 December 2017. At his hearing not only was he denied witnesses who had vital new evidence that should’ve been brought before the court, but also that he was denied legal representation – an obvious right, especially if one is being sentenced at a hearing! In HMP Parc Maurice writes he is still being denied phone calls to family and friends, and his lawyer, and even sending letters to the Royal Courts of Justice and others, along with his right to photocopy documents at his own expense. Letters of complaint should be sent to the Governor, HMP Parc, Heol Hopcyn John, Coity, Bridgend CF35 6AP  regarding these blatant denials of his rights. and the Independent Monitoring Board [a supposedly neutral organisation, there to aid sentence serving citizens when liberties such as phone calls are denied, etc.] should be contacted too, at the same address. So often this writer has found in the past the IMB to be seriously at fault by not doing what they say they will do regarding prisoners rights being trashed by whichever prison.

Received:

continues – MK’s 1st communication from HMP Parc 31/12/17;

MAURICE KIRK: LETTER FROM HMP PARC: REFUSED BASIC RIGHTS AGAIN – 31 DEC 17

Maurice writes from HMP Parc – letter dated 28 Dec. 17 – he was sentenced to 2 years imprisonment at Cardiff Crown Ct. on the 14 December for the alleged “breach of a restraining order” again – an order that was never served according to the law, pertaining to the dubious doctor who claimed, amongst other things, that Maurice had a “brain tumour” and was a threat to himself and society and should therefore be locked away permanently in a closed mental unit. Proper tests that took literally years to get undertaken finally proved that Maurice had no “brain tumour” [see: 5 SEPT: MAURICE KIRK: DOLMANS SOLICITORS, GMC WILL NOT ERASE FALSE REPORT ABOUT NON-EXISTENT “BRAIN TUMOUR”]  and the entire thing was, allegedly, an extremely dubious example of the skullduggery Maurice has become used to over the 23+ years he has been fighting, perfectly reasonably, for justice, yet seems to have been punished for so many times. Each couple of years the figure for the years he has been imprisoned unfairly since 2009 goes up – now this figure has gone up to 7 years unfairly imprisoned since 2009 with the addition of this present term –  maybe even longer. Seeing as this present term of imprisonment alone is based on a restraining order that wasn’t served as the law clearly states it must be in the first place it is remarkably unfair and unjust that a 72 year old citizen should have to put up with such continuing irregularities, considering these are prison sentences and the loss of Maurice’s very freedom that’s happening here, not a paltry monetary fine or similar. It seems that if Maurice had knowledge alone of such an order he is guilty if it is broken – is this right? As the Recorder of Wales stated in a recent hearing that Maurice “had knowledge” of the order – as she  proceeded to give him the date for his 4th trial of “breaching” it. How can this be legal? After all, despite even a jury at a hearing once asking to see the originalorder, it couldn’t be produced.

As is normal for Maurice Kirk whilst he is unjustly imprisoned yet again, basic rights of phone calls, to family, lawyer, and friends etc. are denied him, plus photocopying at his own expense and more are denied him, and worse is that not only was he was denied being taken to a court hearing on the 18 December for, presumably, one of  the many cases he has running against certain authorities, but also a hospital appointment has been denied him too, as shown in his letter received on the 30 Dec. 2017  =

“28/12/17  “Thanks. My first post today after 15 days in prison and still refused permission to telephone my family, mckenzie friends, a lawyer re: machine gun blocked civil damages claim or the RCJ re: police failed 37 malicious prosecutions, RCJ criminal appeal 2014 parole board, alone doubling my prison term [C40CF012] at court of appeal, denied photocopying at my expense, hand my car key out to rescue my legal papers, refused right to pay bills etc. – deja vu? Prison refused to produce me to my 18 December hearing or my hospital appointment [just like HMP Swansea in 2014] under police orders, again, I assume. REMEMBER no court order applies to you or anyone else – so publish what you like and be damned! Is Sabine in or out? None of this letter is confidential. Please circulate. Ring Guy – has he been able to rescue my legal papers + van? 
Email Celia with French tow truck – if not moved in next eg. 10 days Depamnage Galivel [number] Jean Claude may be able to move it [number] PDQ [key under tree opposite] was not there I asked – even tested to check if I was out! – if that is not proof enough? Remember this applying Gulag Card and targetting someone who is a problem to authorities will win – if not well advertised.
I need your help to get evidence to RCJ – I am refused. ” [ends]

Maurice Kirk’s site is:

Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police

Related:

MAURICE KIRK SENTENCED TO 2 YEARS IMPRISONMENT at CARDIFF CROWN COURT 14 Dec. 2017 + archive 16/12/17

All the  250+  posts on Maurice Kirk on this site going back to 2011:

https://butlincat.com/?s=maurice+kirk

FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

NB: DISCLAIMER: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

‘FAKE CLAIMS’ PROBED Three judges are among a group of twelve lawyers being investigated over £15m bogus legal aid claims – Law Gazette

Police suspect that applications for legal aid costs were allegedly made in the names of barristers who didn’t even work on cases

THREE judges are among 12 lawyers being probed over suspected bogus legal aid claims for more than £15million.

Scotland Yard’s fraud team have arrested three suspects and quizzed nine more under caution.

The three judges sit in the South East of England

The CPS has spent two years reviewing the “large and complex investigation” and is considering charges.Three of the suspects questioned under caution sit as part-time judges in the South East of England.

The other nine are solicitors and barristers working for legal firms in London and the Home Counties.Cops have probed ten cases from 2011 and 2012 with total claims of more than £15million, of which around ten per cent was paid.

Defendants who were privately represented were acquitted or had charges dropped, enabling costs to be claimed against the taxpayer.

Some lawyers are suspected of switching clients’ representation without them knowing so they were defended on exorbitant fees instead of lower flat rates.

. . .

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment
%d bloggers like this: