Maurice Kirk: South Wales Police Corruption requires World-Wide Publicity VIA PUBLIC MEETINGS – 12 Nov. 2010 + archive

South Wales Police Corruption requires World-Wide Publicity

by Maurice Kirk

I am prepared to help fund the setting up of a series of public meetings, particularly in Swansea and Cardiff, in order to expose, name and shame those ring leaders both you and I have personally witnessed in your Welsh prisons, police stations and law courts. The primary aim is to give world -wide publicity naming the culprits with their personal details if the committee, to be first formed, so requires.

My contact is maurice@kirkflyingvet.com & tel 07708586202

I need, meantime, to collect short succinct accounts of South Wales police atrocities for a national newspaper that has taken an interest in supporting our cause.. This may lead to a long overdue Ministry of Justice delegation from London to thoroughly investigate the appalling state of our southern welsh law courts, police and prisons. I also want information of criminal activity by the authorities within police forces flanking the ring leaders, the South Wales Police. A designated website is to be set up for the purpose.

watch this space

Maurice Kirk | November 12, 2020 at 1:33 am


source: http://mauricejohnkirk.com/2020/11/12/south-wales-police-corruption-requires-world-wide-publicity/


see more:

Recent Posts

Welsh Authorities Flagrant Disregard for the Rule of Law

Proven Police Conspiracy Perverts the Course of Justice

Police Steal my Three Million Pound Damages Claim Papers

Threat to Kill Lord Mayor of Cardiff re Secretary of State for Wales

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Archive [here] continues [from 2011]:

https://www.butlincat.com/?s=maurice+kirk

Maurice’s site is “Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police” https://www.mauricejohnkirk.com

Email:  maurice@kirkflyingvet.com
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Maurice Kirk: Deliberate perversions of justice: UNLAWFUL STOPPAGE AND DETENTION OF PRISON LETTERS TO RCJ + more – 31 Aug. 2020

South Wales Police Steal Vital MP Letters for Imminent Jury Trial

xxxxxx Street, 1CF03361
Taunton
Somerset

The Chief Constable of South Wales Constabulary
Police HQ
Cowbridge Road,
Bridgend
CF35 3SU

27th August 2020

Dear Sir/Madam,

Deliberate Perversion of Justice

UNLAWFUL STOPPAGE AND DETENTION OF PRISON LETTERS AT HMP PARC and HMP CARDIFF – LETTER BEFORE CLAIM – TORTS (INTERFERENCE WITH GOODS) ACT 1977 – PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 1997 AND HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1999

I write to request the delivery up of thirty-two letters that were stopped without informing me whilst at HMP Parc or at HMP Cardiff when I was serving an unlawful prison sentence there between 17th December 2017 and 1st November 2019.

The reason that these letters were wrongfully stopped and detained was because none of the criteria set out in rule 34(3)(a)-(h) and rule 35A(4)(a)-(f) of the Prison Rules 1999 applied to their contents.

I therefore request the immediate delivery up of these letters payment of damages concerning its unlawful seizure and detention for conversion and wrongful interference with goods under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 and await confirmation of this at a time and venue to be arranged.

I also request payment of damages for conversion and wrongful interference with goods under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and the Human Rights Act 1998 concerning the unlawful stoppage and detention of these letters.

I also request copy of the 16 arch leaver files referred to by the Chief Constable’s QC at the last court hearing as now disclosable to this Claimant in 1CF03361 case that has been unlawfully delayed for almost 10 years.

Failing which, I shall apply to the County Court for an order for the delivery up of these prisons stopped letters and sixteen 1CF03361 defence files resulting from yet another failed malicious prosecution, that I had ‘traded in machine guns’ contrary to s5 of the 1968 Firearms Act.

In addition, I will seek compensatory and aggravated damages from the South Wales Police and Avon & Somerset Police under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and the Human Rights Act 1998 regarding the unlawful stoppage and detention of these letters.

Kindly inform me if you are instructing solicitors and if so their address for service and whether they will accept service of proceedings on the chief constable’s behalf.

Yours faithfully

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Welsh Police are currently refusing to hand over to the the Claimant,, myself, the QC had admitted during a recent court hearing, his 16 arch lever files argument, that my being goaled until acquittal requiring no defence what so ever, was not malicious, went on to say the trial judge had already boasted, Judge Keaser, would dispose of the case within 5 days!.

Not malicious despite hearing evidence, (who wants a copy of the transcript?) in the ridiculously brought criminal hearing, from the purchaser of my 1916 replica DH2 biplane, not only had the police unblocked a piece of water pipe switched from an originally decommissioned Lewis machine gun, the conspiring senior officers also had painted the film prop a different colour in a vain attempt to fool the jury!

My recollection of the Lewis Gun that was owned by Mr. Maurice Kirk.

     I first viewed the gun when Mrs. Cooper and Mr. Page returned from collecting it and brought it through the aircraft hangar I was working in. I am a keen deactivated weapons collector and as such I made a point of having a closer look, I observed the gun was in very poor condition with heavy corrosion. The next morning the gun was laying on a workshop table in the hangar with a newly painted magazine on it, at this point I had to satisfy my own curiosity and had a close up look at the gun. I remember thinking it was so rough it looked like it had been dragged out the North Sea and was so badly corroded that some parts were almost gone, I then looked at the barrel and noted it had the usual metal rod down it and that it could not be cocked or dry fired and at this point I lost interest and put the gun down.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Some considerable time later I was called into Mr. Coopers office where upon he asked me to find him something to fit down the barrel of the Lewis Gun and I returned with an arc welding rod and in front of me Mr. Cooper poked the rod down the barrel of the Lewis gun and pointed out to everyone in the room that this was not the same gun that was taken from him. Although I was not asked for my opinion on that occasion I would agree that it appeared to be a different weapon as it looked in superior condition with a different magazine and all the moving parts looked to be in working condition.

I believe this to be a true and accurate account

signed by the witness

POLICE HARASSMENT CONTINUES

13 th May 2020

Managing Director
G4S
Registered Office
Southside
105 Victoria Street
London
SW1E 6QT

Dear Sir/Madam

UNLAWFUL REMOVAL OF MEDICAL RECORDS,WHEELCHAIR, CASE AND
LEGAL PAPERS FROM HMP PARC – REQUEST FOR THE DELIVERY UP OF
MEDICAL RECORDS, WHEELCHAIR, CASE AND LEGAL PAPERS
UNLAWFULLY REMOVED AND DETAINED AND LETTER BEFORE CLAIM –
TORTS (INTERFERENCE WITH GOODS) ACT 1977

I write to request the delivery up of all of my medical records, wheelchair case and legal
papers that officers and agents of your company wrongly seized and removed from me on my
discharge from HMP Parc on (here give date).
These case and legal papers belong to me and I have previously requested their return.
I now demand their immediate return under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977
and await confirmation of this at a time and venue to be arranged.
Failing which, I shall apply to the County Court for an order for the delivery up of my
medical records, wheelchair, case and legal papers without further notice. In addition, I will
seek an Interim Injunction for the return of the medical records, wheel chair, case and legal
papers and will also seek compensatory and aggravated damages from G4S.
I would also be grateful if you could inform me if your company requires service at your
registered office above at Southside or at the UK Office in Sutton?
If you have instructed solicitors, I would also be grateful if you could inform me whether
they are agreeable to accept service on behalf of your company?
Yours faithfully

Maurice J BVSc

cc UK Office, GP & MP

Before welsh police harassment

AVON & SOMERSET POLICE JUMP IN ON THE ACT OF BLATANT HARASSMENT

20th August 2020

Chief Constable of Avon & Somerset Police

Avon & Somerset Police HQ

Valley Road

Portishead

North Somerset

BS20 8JJ                            The 1st Defendant

and

Chief Executive Officer

Gerec Ltd

Unit 2a Dunball Industrial Estate

Bridgwater

TA6 4TP                            The 2nd Defendant

and

The Proprietor

Bulford Garage

Station Road

Wellington                         The 3rd Defendant

 

Dear Ladies or Gentlemen,

UNLAWFUL SEIZURE OF MOTOR VEHICLES AT BRIDGWATER and CREECH ST MICHAEL AND DETENTION AT DUNBALL and WELLINGTON– LETTER BEFORE CLAIM – TORTS (INTERFERENCE WITH GOODS) ACT 1977 – PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 1997 AND HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1999

I write to request the delivery up of Volvo Estate vehicle AO 55 VCD which was wrongfully and unlawfully seized by officers of the Avon and Somerset Constabulary on 22nd July 2020 and which is currently being unlawfully detained at the compound GEREC at Dunball.

This vehicle was and is continuing to be unlawfully detained because I am the lawful owner with an appropriate licence and insured to drive it away or by way of my car transporter.

In the alternative I produced a Mr A for no less than three hours in the police station disclosing both valid licence and valid insurance to drive my motor vehicle out of  the Gerec police seized vehicle pound whilst in my presence.

In addition, officers of the Avon and Somerset Police further wrongfully and unlawfully seized my lawfully owned Citroen despite my having proof of ownership, a valid driving licence and valid insurance. Thereafter it was detained at the compound at Wellington on the premise that only special insurance taken out would allow both vehicles being released. This was a falsehood with intent. The  seized vehicle was subsequently permitted to be driven away by me on a day  only last week 

I therefore request the immediate delivery up of the Volvo Estate vehicle AO 55 VCD and payment of damages concerning its unlawful seizure and detention for conversion and wrongful interference with goods under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 and await confirmation of this at a time and venue to be arranged.

I also request payment of damages for conversion and wrongful interference with goods under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and the Human Rights Act 1998 concerning the unlawful seizure and detention of both vehicles, both with  legal papers against the police, of deliberate harassment based on false South Wales Police data, namely disclosed in current cases including T20200177 at Exeter Crown Court and ICF03361. I was at all material time the lawful owner of both of these vehicles.

Failing which, I shall apply to the County Court for an order for the delivery up of the Volvo Estate vehicle AO 55 VCD. 

In addition, I will seek an Interim Injunction for the delivery up of the Volvo Estate vehicle AO 55 VCD and will seek compensatory and aggravated damages from Avon & Somerset Police and Garec Ltd under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and the Human Rights Act 1998 regarding the unlawful seizure and detention of both vehicles.

Until a traffic police officer examined my driving licence was it considered valid

Until a traffic police officer examined my Citroen ownership was it considered valid

Until a traffic police officer examined my Citroen insurance was it considered valid

I had indicated the Volvo had been purchased by me for France but a false imprisonment from Taunton magistratess in May 2020, exacerbated by  South Wales Police”s further malicious criminal allegations, by deliberately withholding relevent 1st Aug 2019 data caused me significant mental anguish and worry from this almost 60 years of police harassment

The said data from my interview, from prison under caution, was suppressed because it¹ revealed  many of my letters to MPs, seeking help, had been confiscated without myself or the intended recipients being notified!

I had even produced the previous owner of the Volvo, Mr B, at the police station with covering DVLA change of ownership document but, instead, was told, during ten visits to Bridgwater police station, the previous owner was not him.

Mr C, one of my intended recipients of my stopped prison letters by G45 run HMP Parc, unusually controlled by the South Wales Police, was also a witness to the unlawful seizure of my Citroen. This had followed the attempted fraud by a person known to the police present at the scene.

source: https://mauricejohnkirk.com/2020/08/29/south-wales-police-steal-my-vital-mp-letters-for-an-imminent-jury-trial/


archive continues:

Maurice Kirk: Defence statements – 30 Aug. 20 + archive

Defence statement T20200177 – 5th August 2020 –
Response to Particulars in an alleged breach in a bad law Harassment Act Offence

20 08 06 Defence statement T20200177

———————————————————————————————————————–

Maurice Kirk: Ancient Normandy Law to be tested at Taunton court VIDEO 25 Aug. 2020 + archive

Ancient Normandy law to be Tested in Taunton Courts – lois de reprevin

25 August 2020

Police violently had me robbed in Parc prison by G4S bullies running HMP Parc to seize specific copies of my letters for help to MPs. Even my letter to Alun Cairns MP was confiscated by the South Wales Police for fear of its content. Robbed, of course, of my machine-Gun witness statements in my one million pound 1CF03361 civil claim for yet another failed malicious criminal prosecution in vain attempt to stop my near 30 year running one million pound claim BS614159 etc resulting from over 40 failed South Wales malicious criminal prosecutions

—————————————————————————————————-

UPDATE 22/08/20: More shocking malfeasance by those in the pay of the public purse [funded by the UK taxpayer]

“This week EMS staff lied to Bridgwater police that I had refused to be re tagged in my Taunton flat on arrival from 10 miles away from my previous bail address.

I was in custody for 6 hours but two arresting police officers influenced custody sergeant A— M—- to then release me as reason for arrest was deemed to have been unsafe

The very EMS issues arose again, last night, with EMS staff denying they were the same as time before and even lied to EMS HQ recording they had telephoned my mobile at 20.08 and had wrung the door bell. I had been all that time in a silent flat within 20 feet of the front door .

If their car was registered REDACTED they were sat outside at 19. 56 watching as I parked my foreign (of course) registered car to enter the court designated premises ever since.

If South Wales Police had not deliberately lied to Taunton Magistrate Ms Matthews, on the pertinent facts in this farcicle criminal allegation and had not deliberately also withheld my 1st August 2019 South Wales most revealing but irregular prison interview under caution, I would never have been charged,gaoled or tagged.

I now suffer with Somerset police apparent spite due to a purported missing chief superintendent’s personal pocket note book, of over 40 years ago, by me and now lying to confiscate both of my motor vehicles, on excuse that I have no driving licence, no insurance on either and nor can I prove I own them!

BOTH Somerset and welsh police have refused to retreive my G4S HMP Parc stolen property, OBTAINED IN AN ACT OF VIOLENT ROBBERY, as it contains 1CF03361 witness evidence of welsh police T20097445 conspiracy (machine guns) about to go to civil trial

AND

my copies of my letters for T20200177 jury trial to my usual MPs covering, apart from my vote mattered, the country was under serious threat of having the wrong new prime minister about to be voted in if members did not have a re think.

I will fly out of this country, with no prior warning, if I cannot get assurance for my safety from the Exeter Crown Court within seven days.” [ENDS]”

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Maurice Kirk: I Changed My Plea As Machine Gun Conspiracy is Blown by 10 Year Late Disclosure of South Wales Police Blunt Criminality – 22 Nov. 2020…+ archive

I Changed My Plea As Machine Gun Conspiracy is Blown by 10 Year Late Disclosure of South Wales Police Blunt Criminality

Posted on November 17, 2020 by Maurice Kirk

Statement of Maurice John Kirk: To whom it may concern

and that includes you, Robert Buckland, HM Minister of Justice

Unfortunate Collateral Collusion‘ – LAW IN ACTION BBC4 tonight

That is what the welsh police fooled you lot with in England?

A ‘human under cover intelligent force’ HM House of Lords considers next week.

Mr Robert Buckland, from the heart of welsh incestuous judicial inherent deceit,

Please consider, may I suggest,

You chose to not to assist John Graham Esq in having his letter back, of course, snatched by HMP Parc’s G4S badly bullyingly prison, a copy of it stolen by robbery from me on 1stNov 2019, for the South Wales Police. I had purportedly sent to him it from Cardiff prison, in May 2019, laced with 100% pure heroin, prison officers thought. .

Purportedly sprinkled in ‘white powder’, contrary to 2002 Prevention of Terrorism Act, Taunton Crown Court was told, just across road from me! Dear God, give me strength

What utter nonsense you welsh lawyer bstd. I was gaoled for it , despite un-convicted!

Barrister Robin Shellard, of Queens Square Chambers, Bristol, a personal friend of yours, ever since, in various English hood-winked Crown Courts, as HM Crown Prosecutor, has repeatedly promised me, lying againor far more likely, bamboozled by South Wales Police inherent deceit.

l will get John Graham’s letter back along with my HM Secretary of State for Wales’ letter, my local MP for almost 10 years, Alun Cairns MP, succeeding an equally diligent John Smith MP to ‘help’ constituency members.

So, where is it, Mr Robert Buckland?

JOHN, A DEMONSTRATION IN WHITEHALL APPEARS APPROPRIATE ?

Robin Shellard,? Do you or your HM Prosecutor, Mr NC Evans, of Bristol’s HM Crown Prosecution Service office welsh designated , in 2009, to cover -up the welsh police machine gun conspiracy, know where my letters are, key prosecution exhibits, my letters, simply asking for help?

If Mr Graham cannot get back my allegedly sent Cardiff prison letter to him, that had me gaoled in Exeter prison for so many weeks, YOU idiots or are you, to drop the criminal charge against me for sending it, despite my Exeter Crown Court voracious expletives wishing to the contrary, are the Welsh Authorities, who started this vendetta nearly three decades ago, by having me struck off as a veterinary surgeon and destroying my family life, going to be allowed to get away with it, yet again?

Dream on, you ‘jobs for life’ dreamers, I am still breathing and I have not even changed up to 2nd gear, yet.

Has not the real welsh reason dawned on you , Mr Buckland and your side kick, fellow barrister, Robin Shellard, why the South Wales Police had. yet again, fabricated the whole bl..dy nonsense in the first place.

After my last eleven years, with five of them in welsh prisons, the South Wales Police conspiracy of my ‘trading in machine guns’, in order to stop my BS614159 civil claim arising from the chief constable having lost over 40 odd maliciously brought criminal prosecutions. it is finally blown apart.

I am, at last, in possession of 20 odd arch lever police files of which many were illegally police/Dolmans withheld from my February 2010 jury trial facing a mandatory 10 year prison term.

SUMMARY

Upon my incarceration in Caswell Clinic in July 2009 in an attempt to avoid the ‘machine-gun trial, as by 23rd June 2009 Nottinghamshire police had already examined the replica, after taking statements from the new owners, the Coopers, to confirm it was pieces of water pipe and plumber’s scrap put together as a make believe Battle of the Somme Lewis Machine Gun.

I invite readers of this website, from all around the world, to stimulate my ideas as to what I do with this horde of welsh police/Dolmans criminal conduct bearing in mind , as I quote Voltairam yet again:

‘When the State get it wrong it is dangerous to be right’

Alex with Snipe just before my DH2 WW1 replica with decommissioned Lewis machine gun flew at the 2000 Farnborough International  Air Show following a specific order from Captain Brian Trubshaw of 002 fame.

All this was withheld from me while smouldering in my Cardiff prison cell. for nearly eight months, until the Cardiff Crown Court farcical hearing ( see full transcript illegally withheld from me for over 10years despite having paid a string of corrupt solicitors, in advance, to grab it before it was shredded like my RCJ’s RCVS tapes of John Thomas LCJ admitting the multiple errors, at last, of my veterinary college’s hearing dependant on south Wales Police voracity or complete lack of it!

The ‘gun’ was videoed, as stripped down by ‘gun’ expert Huxtable at police HQ, to find thieves had ‘raided the larder’ before him. The inside of the replica Lewis was empty, of course, purloined years earlier due to the weapons WW1 parts value, to build a second but working Lewis this time, were nnever in my ‘possession’ The mere weight of it was a give away.

The South Wales Police , in desperation, therefore switched its senior officer MAPPA level 3 category 3 committee conspiracy, on 7th August 2009 and blackmailed their doctor for ‘sexual indiscretions in Caswell Clinic with Dr Roger Thomas as one of the ring leaders.

Caswell clinic staff, with judge Richard Thomlow, then the bent HM Crown Prosecutor, had a secret hearing with a certain Crown Court judge , without my knowing of it, until 2020, to have me locked away in Ashworth high security psychiatric prison for life.

Note the welsh police waited until 13th July 2009 before recording it was going to ‘examine’ Exhibit ARH 1

So where are the photos of the remaining machine gun components

Deliberate lies to deliberately cover- up, first by the South Wales Police and then Adrian Oliver of Dolmams , solicitors, defending the Chief Constable, ‘shoot to kill’ Barbara Wilding, in order to stop my 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecution 1CF03361+2 damages claim , requiring well in excess of 200 witnesses, nearly all police officers

The sheer spite and greed in Adrian Oliver, senior partner of Dolmans, manifests itself time and time again in these last new thirty years, that he was actually present at my 18th June 2009 impromptu visit to police HQ, Bridgend with my ‘witness statements’ for ‘mutual ‘exchange’ clearly tucked under my arm’ is revealed.

Only this week, with my having to spend many hundreds of pounds having the recently acquired withheld police files scanned, again, as the court had heard, he and his QC, Lloyd Williams, feared if I ever laid my hands on this vast treasure trove of police/lawyer deceit, as all implicated are immune to prosecution , of course, by not simply emailing me the 20 odd arch leaver files it would frustrate my prosecution by even more months.

Now and lest we forget, only due to a cock-up for Judge Keiser’s absence from court in October had ‘triggered’ this discovery that now needs and English police force to cause a criminal investigation,

Lloyd Williams QC in on the act back in 2000 in Bristol County Court

Andrew Keiser QC , the HHJ Beard QC court had heard this Summer, from leading police counsel , had already decided to be the jury trial judge and had already fixed my machine gun damages claim, ‘behind closed doors’.

Barrister Lloyd Williams told the startled new judge, clearly unaware of the daily level of deceit, to expect, metered out in welsh law courts, was going to be no jury and Keiser will dispose of the 200 odd witnesses within no more than five days!

“Are you gentlemen looking for machine-guns, by any chance, as Jacques and I were surrounded at Bridgend’s South Wales Police HQ, by armed police in tin hats and sporting flak jackets and stun grenades?”

Readers, I am only on the first 100 odd pages in these approximate 3000 pages of police conspiracy withheld relevant documentation, from my bemused jury, including key eye witness MG 11 statements taken down before the January 2010 trial, number T20097445 had even started.

All 10 years too late for my two million pound civil damages claim, Case number BS614169 +2, delayed, of course, by most senior judge of the welsh courts, Seys Llewellyn QC (quaintly corrupt).

Seys Llewellyn , after his ridiculous BS case judgement, had deliberately waited 16 months, no less, before the the law could be changed for a mere Englishman was no longer able to appeal it to HM Royal Courts of Justice,

Clever was he not? Judge Seys Llewellyn QC had waited until his day of retirement to simply ‘seal’ his court order’ in order for HM Criminal Court of Appeal, in law be allowed to hear it BUT now only in the same incestuous court in the Cardiff’s Civil Justice Centre ..

Meantime, Luigi Stranati, court manager, if not caught red handed emptying my 1st December 2011 Cardiff Magistrates court room of chairs to prevent my followers, like Sabine MacNeill and 20 others being allowed into the clandestine despicably run hearing, to witness my cooked-up ‘restraining order’ conviction, he takes it upon himself , then as Wales regional manger , to ban my entry yo yhe public counter for 10 years.

Why, you may well ask, to prevent my obtaining the transcript of BS614159 +2 civil claims, in order to appeal it or the copy of the court log notorious in my decades suffering under the stench of welsh civil and criminal court rooms .

All refused to this day, of course.

My diagnosed history is ‘highly complex, convoluted and difficult to understand’. ‘The clinical picture appears to be of a man who has always had a background of minor cognitive difficulties (poor writing and spelling)’ I, apparently, ‘developed a personality characterised by ‘narcissism (an abnormal sense of entitlement), grandiosity (believing that normal rules and regulations do not apply to me) and paranoia (believing I am the victim of persecution). I also show evidence of poor judgement.

‘impulsivity and a willingness to hold myself hostage by way of hunger strike in an attempt to manipulate his environment’. [I have never lost a hunger strike] Whilst these personality characteristics have undoubtedly overshadowed my life and probably had a negative affect on my social and family functioning, they appear to have been reasonably stable throughout my life.

However, as for myself and the evidence both suggest that over the past two years both my functioning has deteriorated and that my beliefs have ” become more intense and overwhelming and at sometimes, though not others, are clearly abnormal. I now show clear evidence of some degree of neuro-cognitive damage (brain damage), probably as a result of a combination of normal ageing, previous heavy alcohol misuse and deceleration injuries following plane crashes.

Brain scans both before this ‘opinion’, in Texas, England and Wales and after, in France and Wales, identified no damage beyond the normal aging parameters. Where is the evidence of alcohol abuse other than having been, briefly, a drinking partner of my dear old friend, actor, Oliver Reed?

‘Deceleration’ injuries, as being a possible factor, is totally fabricated to justify quite unqualified Professor Rodger Wood using me as a human guinea pig, in Caswell Clinic for SPEC brain scans in August 2009, requiring intravenous radio isotopes into my brain.
I have experienced significant hearing difficulties ever since.

The specific area of brain damage affects my ability to monitor and control my behaviour, decreases self-awareness, judgement and decision making abilities and have compounded my paranoid beliefs to the extent that when subjected to further stress, my beliefs intensify so that for periods they have a quality of a paranoid delusional disorder (mental illness characterised by fixed false beliefs unamenable to reason of a paranoid nature).
Poor judgment, alright, in my believing normal standards within the local law courts and local police force would be on a par to those in England!

‘ Welsh Authority’ is reliant on the doctor’s premise that I suffer misbelief in what the South Wales Police has done to me and my family.

With regard to treatment, neither my underlying personality nor brain damage will respond to medical intervention. Due to the transient nature of my clearly abnormal beliefs (as opposed to my general paranoid view of the world) it is unlikely that medication will make any significant impact, though it is impossible to be certain. Appropriate medication, apparently, has been offered which I have refused.

The relative safety of Cardiff prison within that s35 three-month horror, as a ‘human guinea pig’ for couple of ignorant clinicians to play games, cannot be expunged from my mind.

Clinically it is unclear whether my brain damage is likely to progress. Should it do so my difficulties will become more marked and I will become more obviously disabled. Of particular concern is that this may well involve increasing impulsivity and poor judgement, features which are already apparent.

With regard to risk, risk is always difficult to quantify especially in highly complex cases such as this and it is also impossible to consider my risk in isolation from those who I may encourage to act on my behalf.

Where is the proof of this police doctor’s ‘mumbo jumbo’? What was the ‘appropriate’ medication?

My remedy is very simple, the Chief Constable of South Wales Constabulary stops the campaign of police bullying and deceit or stop losing cases in your own police courts.

‘The risk of my continuing with my actions against South Wales Police and acting in a way that I feel justified to achieve my ends is high’, though whether I myself would be involved in inter-personal violence is less, is cannot be discounted. I am also told nor can the risk that others would act violently without my encouragement. If my condition is progressive, these risks are likely to increase.
It cannot be discounted I may, someday without help from my MP, fall under a bus, the prize idiot.

If this Caswell Clinic diagnosis is true then the validity of my five years in Welsh prisons must be in doubt.

I therefore, in the absence of help, change my plea to that of insanity,

Signed

Date 16th November 2020

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Archive [here] continues [from 2011]
https://www.butlincat.com/?s=maurice+kirk

Maurice’s site is “Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police” https://www.mauricejohnkirk.com

Email:  maurice@kirkflyingvet.com——————————————————————————————————————————————–Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Queen Square Chambers Bristol Fraud

Posted on November 13, 2020 by Maurice Kirk

FAO HM Prosecutor,

13th Nov 2020

(By hand)

Dear Sir/Madam,

South Wales Police fraud

I wish to make an application at your earliest available court for an outside police force to investigate as to why neither the South Wales Police and now, nor will the Avon and Somerset Constabulary, investigate fraud.

Clerk to HM Crown Court

The Shire Hall

 Taunton

Somerset TA1 4EU

13th Nov 2020

(By hand)

Dear Sir/Madam,

South Wales Police fraud

I wish to make an application at your earliest available court for an outside police force to investigate as to why neither the South Wales Police and now, nor will the Avon and Somerset Constabulary, investigate fraud.

This, again, implicates a number of CPS and Dolmans lawyers and senior police officer in South Wales (see failed disclosure in Exeter Crown court proceedings) and why the violent 1st Nov 2019 robbery on me by G4S HMP Parc staff was so instructed to purloin my court & medical papers in order obstruct my court claims against them and dep-rive my Taunton GP now a consultant is involved following the prison denying my essential daily Omeprazole.

My written complaints to each police force, both stating my letters to Alun Cairns MP and John Graham were stuffed with heroin or similar substance ,contrary to the 2001 Prevention of Terrorism Act, neither Mr Graham, prosecution witness turned defence witness, nor myself can obtain.

Of these missives we are denied sight of originals or even purported photo copies of either all for one very good reason, The welsh three decades of nefarious conduct is now, at last, starting to fall apart around their ears.

As neither police force, one year on, still will not recover my stolen G4S property or retrieve my  purported two letters  I ask that this, my application, be expedited.

Thankyou,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

 tel 07708586202

maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

MY reply from complaint to Independent Office of

JUST HOW MUCH MORE INCESTUOUS CAN THIS COVER-UP GET?

Attachments

Dear Maurice Kirk,

 Thank you for contacting the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). We acknowledge the details of your complaint against South Wales Police. The IOPC case reference number is 2020/145308. Please use this if you contact us regarding this matter. 

We are completely independent of the police service and are responsible for making sure that the police complaints system in England and Wales works effectively and fairly. Our role at this stage is to forward your complaint to the relevant police force, which must decide whether to record the complaint.

Recording means that a record is made of the complaint giving it formal status as a complaint under the Police Reform Act 2002. I have therefore passed the matter to the Professional Standards Department (PSD) of South Wales Police.

 Please contact them directly if you have not had a response from them using the details below: South Wales PoliceProfessional Standards DepartmentTy Richard ThomasNewlands AvenueBrackla Industrial EstateBridgendCF31 2DATel: 01656 655 555Email: Professional.standards@South-Wales.pnn.police.uk If you have any further information you wish to pass on, please forward it directly to the PSD using the above details.

 You should, usually, hear from the PSD within 15 working days. However, given the current corona virus (Covid-19) pandemic it may take longer for the PSD to be in contact.  Yours sincerely, 

 James BromleyCustomer Contact Advisor
Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC)
PO Box 473

Sale
M33 0BW  Email: enquiries@policeconduct.gov.ukWebsite: www.policeconduct.gov.uk Follow us on twitter @policeconductFind out how we handle your personal data How satisfied were you with your experience with the IOPC’s Customer Contact Centre? Let us know by taking this short survey.All information will be treated in accordance with the Data Protection Act. Os bydd arnoch angen yr arolwg hwn yn Gymraeg, cysylltwch â ni ar userfeedback@policeconduct.gov.uk os gwelwch yn dda.  This message and its content may contain confidential, privileged or copyright information. They are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you received this message in error, you must not disclose, copy, distribute or take any action which relies on the contents. Instead, please inform the sender and then permanently delete it. Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the IOPC. Only specified staff are authorised to make binding agreements on behalf of the IOPC by email. The IOPC accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The IOPC cannot guarantee the security of this email or any attachments. While emails are regularly scanned, the IOPC cannot take any liability for any virus that may be transmitted with the internet. The IOPC communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and or attachments may be read by monitoring staff….

Dear Mr Stellard,

Is it the 4th or 5th occasion that I have heard from you and counterparts, in your absence, assure me that the South Wales Police will disclose to you my original letter to JOHN GRAHAM Esq, from Cardiff prison and my one to alun Cairns MP.

But you very well know the South Wales Police and G4S are congenital liars, proven so many times in the past.

I will be seeking an urgent application at my nearest HM Crown Court, Taunton’s across the road, for and outside police force to be called in to investigate on how the South Wales Police have, yet again, hood-winked English authorities, this time, the Avon & Somerset Constabulary and HM Crown Prosecution Service (England) ,meaning you

Prison staff, you must have been made aware of by now, told me that the ‘white powder’, regularly found in my outgoing mail, was assumed to be the heroin that I had routinely been supplying my Vale of Glamorgan member of parliament, Alun Cairns MP. The ‘white powder’, stinking remarkably of prison issue toothpaste’ appears to have put me in no alternative position but to obtain a witness statement for my next court application ,shortly. from Alun Cairns MP.

Were we go again, this time English lawyers cashing in on their immunity to prosecution when employed by bent Welsh clients like some of those in the South Wales judiciary I have encountered over the last near thirty years.

I was forced to explain, publically, to HM Recorder of Exeter Crown Court,that the South Wales Police , with malice aforethought, covered up Alun Cairns MP’s involvement in my being accused of running a thriving business in the narcotics trade from my F block psychiatric wing of HMP Cardiff

rough draft

1. Between a day  in May 2019  and June 2019 G4S staff at HMP Cardiff conducted a 32 minute cell search,with drug sniffer dogs, in the absence of the occupant, Maurice Kirk.

 2.  My Kirk who was locked, throughout the search, in the shower room in  his wheelchair.

3.  This prisoner’s correspondence was taken from his F block cell and possibly along with his  BS614159 and 1CF03361 civil claim papers during his time locked in the shower

4.  Both civil claims resulted from South Wales Police’s  40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions and the notorious Maurice ‘trading in machine guns’ acquittal, requiring no defence or summing up , what so ever.

5. Late police disclosure reveals both John Graham’s and then HM Secretary of State for Wales, Alun Cairns MP’s letters from Mr Kirk were amongst documents stolen from his cell or in the days shortly after in June 2019 all allegedly containing ‘ an unknown ‘harmless white powder’;6. Late disclosure by way of Mr Kirk’s police interrogation on 1st August 2019 and witness statements by prominent eye witnesses revealed the ‘investigation was still ongoing .

6. On 1st November 2019 Mr Kirk was violently ejected from the prison but G4S refusing to give him any of the contents of his cell , no doubt , handed over to the defendant in the multi-million pound damages claims

7. Mr Kirk wrote to MPs both before and since his 2019 incarceration in HMP Parc but still unable to recover his incriminating property that included his Caswell Clinic medical records sent to the prison by Dr Gaynor Jones

 8. On 1st November 2019 G4S staff handed to the driver of a car, picking up Mr Kirk, a package of Cardiff prison stopped letters , both in or out of  prison with a 2nd bundle of prison stopped letters addressed to or from HMP Parc, Bridgend.

9. John Graham’s ‘stopped’ letters were found in both prison’s letter bundles (containing many 1st class stamps) but no letter, purportedly  from Mr Kirk , with ‘white powder’ the exhibit relied on for the criminal charge that had Mr Kirk imprisoned for a long time until the charge was dropped.

10. Similarly , Mr Kirk’s letters purported to Alun Cairns MP and other MPs with ‘white powder’ could not be found in the returned HMP Parc letter bundles  on the 1st November 2019

JOHN , that was a draft on my personal involvement so, please, to enlighten an outside police force invetigation list audit trail of welsh authorities putting up two fingers to0 your FOI and Data Protection Act requests.

Thankyou

My current website, mauricejohnkirk.com  reminds you that G4S, at HMP Parc, was clearly immune to prosecution when robbing me for the machine gun papers for South Wales Police’s defending my various multi million pound damages claims for their 40  odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions, including  my ‘trading in machine-guns’ blown conspiracy.

Tomorrow, with the  CPS and South Wales Police refusing to disclose its court prosecution exhibits that forced their dropping the proposed charge, I have been supplying  HM  Secretary of State for Wales with raw undiluted suspect heroin, to John Graham, by mutual consent and to another MP I cannot not name.

(this is only a sound bite precis of the hidden welsh prison records that I am asking you to obtain for our presiding judge.

Mr Stellard , your barrister colleague, Mr Christopher Smythe, one of my proposed witnesses in my action again the South Wales’ judicial authorities, will be only too willing to confirm to you and judge Johnson, I have no doubt , he never found sufficient evidence that I had ever been ‘served’ a restraining order in a December 201i magistrate cell, in the first place, by a cabal of the Taffia that crowed around my open cell door.

HM Crown Prosecutor Evans, remember, who I had deliberately arrested in the foyer of Cardiff’s Civil Justice Centre, in order he tell your Bristol Crown Court, on my cross examination, precisely what I wanted.

EVANS “Yes, it was my 2nd preliminary draft of the Magistrate’s proposed ‘restraining order’ offered to me for negotiation but not accepted by me at the cell door

Remember, Mr Stellard , I was then promptly arrested in the Cardiff magistates and handcuffed in my wheelchair, for not attending the 28th Nov 2011 notorious Nigerian, MUSA family six snatched kids by Haringay Council court hearing.

Why? Because the welsh prison deliberately would not allow me to attend!

Mrs Sabine MacNeill tackling fraudulent POWELL lawyers, in Kilburn high street refusing to return its brief to their Musa parents in order to keep stealing the Legal aid money for 6 kids snatched by Haringay county council
JOHN GRAHAM ESQ and Coronation Street b..tch debacle is why South Wales Police implicated John Graham as dealing in heroin from me ottonham Police Station

The stupid Taunton Magistrate, Ms Williams, fell for it and even referred to that day’s criminal offence, FTA, of not attending a London court, to oppose my bail application,

She sent me, instead, to Exeter gaol, nine years later. This current incident is again appearing to be fraud to be repeated by the lawyers employed by CPS’s Mr Evans,

No wonder the G4S did such serious bullying of me, all last year, as it was protected by the mickey mouse Min of J J /G4S SPV contract to make it difficult for prisoners from claiming for their injuries.

TO 
Ex prisoners, my contact email is maurice@kirkflyigvet.com https://mauricejohnkirk.

Lastly, but far from not least, I wrote to you and waited the statutory time , laid down for your CPS Review of the case. This was triggered in the light of the startling new evidence, I referred to in court, of how the South Wales Police are constantly lying to you, as they do, as to just where are the court exhibits John Graham has been denied? 

Such is the real risk their not keeping their fat state funded pensions I am putting you on notice I am filing a Judicial Review application in the RCJ in HM  Administrative Court without further ado.

If by tomorrow you disclose or give me written assurances that those defence exhibits to which the learned judge considers I am entitled will come to me with the CDs of my two police interviews, under caution, within 10 days then I will turn my ‘guns’ back on the human excrement  I so regularly find in Cardiff court rooms.

thankyou  


Maurice J Kirk BVSc  
Tel 07708586202   …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Archive [here] continues [from 2011]:

https://www.butlincat.com/?s=maurice+kirk

Maurice’s site is “Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police” https://www.mauricejohnkirk.com

Email:  maurice@kirkflyingvet.com 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Maurice Kirk:Police Steal my Three Million Pound Damages Claim Papers 05 Nov. 2020 + archive

1CF03361 Machine-gun damages claim and linked MP Allegation

South Wales Police seized page one as I had not presented page two, apparently and instead arrested me for ‘Threatening to Kill the Lord Mayor of Cardiff with a Machine Gun

Dear sir,

 Dolmans’ Fraudulent South Wales Police ‘Trading in Machine -guns’ Conspiracy cover-up now unblocked by Judge Andrew Keiser QC

You know why South Wales Police concocted counter-court proceedings, that I had sent a potentially harmful ‘white powder’ from a prison cell to the then HM Secretary of State for Wales, Alun Cairns MP and John Graham Esq.

The welsh police have now been made to drop both criminal charges, drawn up under anti-terrorism legislation but refuses to return my alleged letters (found in drug sniffer dog 32 minute cell search in Cardiff prison. nor will the welsh police send on to either John Graham or Alun Cairns MP while blatantly and unlawfully ignoring  applications for disclosure under both the Data Protection Act and Freedom of Information Act.

A sample of the Welsh prison’s ‘stopped’ prisoner’s correspondence, in and out, returned to me last year during G4S’s brutal ejection of me from Parc Prison on 1st November 2019.

My letters out of welsh prisons were destined for the Royal Courts of Justice’s HM Court of Appeal, for my then being served full two year prison term (refused any remission)

My letters included those in and out of my family and friends and to lawyers seeking help and now, most relevant, those addressed to MPs I had previously corresponded with re this perpetual, extreme and unusual welsh police bullying on an Englishman when simply seeking PLAN F as my last avenue of redress other than suicide.

I defy anyone who knows of anyone in the UK that has won over 40 malicious criminal prosecutions brought by their own local police force with only a 11% in 113 criminal allegations before the chief constable had to plotted ‘Operation Challis’ in the hope I could be MAPPA3/3 registered to be lawfully shot.

I defy anyone who knows any one who has had to endure months locked in a prison cell, like last year, when subjected, day and night, to prisoner and staff foul language aimed at him with buckets of urine being thrown into his cell and raw human faeces rubbed over his bed.

All triggered by South Wales Police concocted criminal convictions, including ‘child abuse’, ‘fire-arms’ and ‘narcotics’, anything to stop my substantial decades running civil damges claims from progressing any further.

I therefore forced to instruct anyone out there , urgently,  to apply to an appropriate outside police force to:

a)   seize those withheld prison letters

b)   seize my G4S HMP Parc, Bridgend, confiscated medical records, urgently requested by my Taunton MP following my recent colonoscopy CT scan

c)   seize my  ‘trading in machine-guns’  South Wales Police conspiracy legal papers with original witness statements

d)  seize back my clothes, shoes and wheelchair also featuring in my numerous  civil damages claims

e)  seize outstanding Dolmans, solicitors, withheld files in respect to my BS614159 +10 and 1CF03361 multi million pound damages claims.

Much of the above  data is required for my remaining criminal matters I have to face

thankyou


Maurice J Kirk BVSc  
Tel 07708586202                                                                            www.kirkflyingvet.commauricejohnkirk.wordpress.commaurice@kirkflyingvet.com

 
Maurice Kirk | November 5, 2020 at 10:49 am | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: https://wp.me/p13xk8-4fJ
 
——————————————————————————————————-
 

Archive [here] continues [from 2011]

Threat to Kill Lord Mayor of Cardiff re Secretary of State for Wales

Let us, Ladies and Gentlemen, not forget that the South Wales Police, so desperate in order to stop my BS614159+10 other substantial civil claims for damages progressing, for their losing 40 odd malicious criminal prosecutions, will stop at nothing now, to save their pensions, to have me gaoled for another 5 year prison term in their latest fabricated allegation of sending heroin from my Cardiff prison cell to the then HM Secretary of of State for Wales, Alun Cairns MP.

 

????

This current fabricated criminal allegation, carrying for me a 5 to 10 year prison term that I sent John Graham Esq possibly anthrax spores by post from a welsh prison cell, when all knew it was simply prison issue toothpaste for gluing key docs to my prison cell, is , was and will be proved in court that the South Wales corrupt police force, again fabricated the whole thing, we all patiently await for!!!!!!!

 

An MP refusing to reply to John Graham Esq’s reasonable letter, asking for help, at last, but bust open the long run Welsh prisons /South Wales Police routinely stopping of prisoners’ letters both in or out of their welsh prisons with neither the proposed recipients nor senders being officially notified.

Meantime, my Taunton County Court will be busy over the remaining car also, of course , was stuffed with my 1CF03361 One million pound ‘trading in machine guns’ claim, following yet another South Wales Police failed malicious prosecutions

.watch this space, today

 
we have evil welsh bstds on the run

The police stolen legal papers in the Volvo and Citroen will be settled in a Taunton County Court

PRISON STOPPED LETTERS

Mr Mr Cairns MP, (posted 3rd November 2020)

1) G4S run HMP Parc, Bridgend, has again confirmed my letters to you from that prison, during during 2009 and 2020, were either stamped, following HM approval and sent on to you or they were destroyed.

Criminal Conduct

2) I therefore, ask, again, for copy of my letters that reached your offices, during the time I was severely harassed by the South Wales Police, in order that I can pursue £500,000 damages claim currently lodged in the Taunton high court.

3) In particular, I am concerned with the whereabouts of my letter to you found in my cell by G4S following a 32 minute cell search with sniffer dogs, while I was locked in the shower block in my wheelchair on or about the 19th May 2019.

4) Other MP letters were also purloined by G4S addressed to MPs following the incessant conduct of your bullying and deceitful police force.

5) My stamped addressed letter to John Graham Esq was also allegedly found in my cell with the G4S refusing to return or admit they have destroyed that letter alone with yours.

6) I am confident, at this stage, you will not be required to examination before any court over this serious matter.

7) I wrote to you earlier on how the prison staff under police instruction, no doubt, were witnessed by many prisoners in the act of stopping over 30 of my letters from even leaving the prison wing office! They included my appeal to HM Court of Appeal over a vindictive 2 year prison term for simply having reported criminal conduct by a doctor whilst in Cardiff’s police station and law courts.

6) To whom do I complain if an MP fails even to communicate with a constituency member even when he was desperately seeking serious help, a duty bestowed on any MP in the UK?

thankyou

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dolmans Solicitors Police Fraud

Adrian Oliver, senior partner, continues to enjoy immunity to criminal prosecution, only because he is in Cardiff and because he is defending the South Wales Chief Constable in Barbara Wilding’s 2009 ‘machine-gun’ conspiracy when attempting to having me shot.

To have me shot for welsh police losing over 40 malicious criminal prosecutions.

Now, the machine -gun civil claim enters its 11th year not a patch on my civil claim BS614159 etc (40failed prosecutions) as that goes on now into its 3rd decade, not unlikeJarndyce and Jarndycein dickens’ Bleak House.

Why? well the corrupt welsh first stopped my entering the court building for nearly 10 years, to slow me down and because the HM Royal Courts of Justice are refusing, due the stench of it, to allow to hear my appeal with its transcripts and court log records confiscated — what really goes on in our welsh law courts.

The police bullying continues…….

CASE NO:1CF03361

& D00CF279

IN THE CARDIFF COUNTY COURT

MAURICE JOHN KIRK

Claimant

and

CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES CONSTABULARY

Defendant

This is an N244 Application (Cases 1CF03361 and D00CF279) to vary and remove all sanctions in the Order 31 May 2019 and for Directions as to how to proceed when not understanding past Court Directions and Orders. And is made in response to a Cardiff County Court email message 14 January 2019 to the unrepresented Claimant from HHJ Keyser QC, kindly explaining the meaning of the Order 31 May 2019 that the stay is lifted as from 9 January 2020 and the Claimant should now make this application promptly.

Introduction

.

  1. The Defendant have for ten years stood by what Dr XX says in his reports as a part of the Lewis Gun prosecution 2009 as true reliable fair and accurate. Yet as a part of this Lewis Gun case Dr XX in his report to the Cardiff Crown Court 30 September 2009 point 11 says:-

“…My current preliminary position is that whilst Maurice Kirk is fit to plead, his difficulty in organising ……as a result of brain injury……..he would be unable to conduct his own defence”

  • As Dr XX says the Claimant has significant “irreversible” brain damage it follows that by what Dr XX says in 2009 may apply in 2019 so that the Claimant would be unable to organise a complex case at a Court.
  • If the Defendant does not stand by Dr XX as being true reliable fair and accurate then that opens up how the Defendant has maliciously and dishonestly imprisoned the Claimant from 2011 to 2019 based on prosecution papers that the Defendant knew was untrue and as a way to obstruct the Claimant’s ability to progress his civil proceedings. Which the Claimant believes is what has happened. 
  • Importantly to understand the deceit by the Defendant and prove they have done wrong by dishonesty at the Courts and to have interfered with the Claimant’s ability to progress civil proceedings, we do not need to go into whether the Claimant was guilty of harassment of the doctor who wrote false and malicious reports.
  • We only need to look at how the Defendant when bring prosecution deceitfully portraying the doctor as all good having done no wrong and the Claimant as all bad. So that the sentencing and subsequent harsh treatment was grossly disproportionate for the Claimant ‘rationally’ saying the truth that under the Section 12 annual and periodic renewal process of Mental Health Act 1983, the public and UK wide profession needs to know.
  • It is the proportionality of the sentence and harshness of the treatment there after, as a result of deceit, malice and dishonesty (by not admitting the serious, if not criminal wrong Dr XX does) is actually how the Defendant has interfered in the Claimant’s ability to progress his civil cases and the Lewis Gun case civil claim.      
  • In short the Defendant has directly and indirectly deliberately triggered so many problems for the Claimant that a normal person could not manage Court procedure and deadlines with the Defendant causing so many civil and criminal proceedings and disputes, all with intense detail and while the Claimant has a loss of liberty with legal papers confiscated and formal post to and from Courts and relevant parties blocked or withheld.
  • While experiencing loss of liberty the Claimant had a number of potentially serious health issues where because the Defendant triggers the Claimant be dealt with harshly so that access to care became an embroiled dispute. And physical assaults occurred on top of potentially serious physical medical problems. Yet while all this occurred the Claimant was left without adequate medical care.
  • Also from what the Defendant caused while at the Bail Hostel for a short period, the Claimant was singled out for a different set of conditions which were far stricter and harsher regime to his peers. Again this led to more dispute casework.   
  1. The problems and number of disputes and issues are by far too many, too detailed and too hard going for the Client/lawyer relationship to cope. And the cost of trying to fight back in defence using lawyers is far too expense for any lay person.

The Defendant Interfered and obstructed the main substantive civil case hearing in Cardiff in 2013

  1. The Claimant takes this opportunity to point out that the Defendant improperly used one of the four criminal prosecutions over Dr XX (based on evidence they knew was untrue) to prevent the Claimant being able to organise and have essential police evidence and witnesses in the 2013 main BS614159 substantive hearing into the wrongdoing by South Wales Police.   

The Claimant is not understanding what to do.

  1. The unrepresented lay Claimant genuinely cannot understand Court Orders and what is required of him and that includes how he was supposed to respond in case D00CF279. The Claimant does not understand how to go about listing his Document when the Defendant’s lawyers block the Claimant reading their Documents. And other example is, do Documents listed in the Further Particulars need to be again listed in a list of Documents?    

The Defendant provoke problems from Multi Agencies as a way to obstruct the Claimant from taking part in civil proceedings

  1. Regards the material time to comply with Court Orders. It took all manner of failed attempt by lawyers to try to urgently protect the Claimant by addressing huge problems, to only then realise that the Claimant and Claimant’s lawyer’s time is wasted trying to get an organisation to treat the Claimant fairly if the Defendant as police (and senior police) use their authority to tell the organisation to do different and the Defendant as police impose organisations use false information and cause organisations to treat the Claimant harshly and unfairly .
  1. When the Lewis Gun case prosecution failed and the Defendant has use and continue obvious events within the Lewis Gun case to imprison the Claimant each year since the Lewis Gun case ended in 2010.
  1. A simple way to get through a decade of detail is to compare the 2008/9 Lewis Gun case with the last prosecution by the Defendants knew what they saying was not true fair reasonable or proportionate.
  1. The Defendant as senior police control Multi Agency working and the information on which multi agencies make decisions regards the Claimant.  
  1. Intensely false criminal records – including child abuse and fire arms Narcotics, ABH and FTA false convictions. So many false entries the problem is hard to deal with.
  • False and wildly exaggerated risk assessments are caused by endless untrue comments on top of a false criminal history. So many false comments they are hard to deal with.
  • Being wrongly regarded as very high risk causes loss of liberty and rights to further obstruct the Claimant and triggers he be treated harshly and unfairly. Which again leads to so very many problems and disputes they are hard to deal with.
  • The Defendant triggered obstructing if not blocking access to health care leading to considerable hardship and more disputes that arise where they resist the Claimant be allowed his basic rights. Which over the last two-year sentence led to so many problems and disputes they are hard to deal with.
  • Parole decisions were based on false data maliciously supplied by police to cause extra prison terms in all convictions and in both prison recalls
  • The G4S subculture take it upon themselves that given the Defendant senior police say such of the Claimant that G4S not only can obstruct the Claimant’s legal papers and proceedings but are free to subject the Claimant to beatings and bullying and also to get the fellow violent prisoners to do same to the Claimant. Again, there were so many incidents which are also part of a prison dispute system it is all too much and too difficult to cope with.
  • Things became so wild that when the Claimant sent the usual harmless letters to his English and Welsh MPs streets were sealed off and the Claimant interviewed under caution in case the very small residue of the Claimant’s toothpaste on the back of his letters posed a most serious risk to the public and Members of Parliament. Again, the Defendant saw to it that this ongoing episode was not a small matter so that again made it hard for the Claimant to manage all of the above and the civil proceedings. 
  • The Claimant personal life has turmoil from similar outside of prison and his lawyer along with family has to try to address matters there.
  1. So many intense problems were occurring that the volume of quite unnecessary work caused by the Defendant becomes unmanageable for the Claimant and the huge volume and intensity would undermine any lawyer client relationship and be far too expensive for a normal lay Claimant.      

Claimant needs the Court to explain what is expected of him.

  1. The Claimant needed and still needs the Court to explain to him what was and what now is required of him given the increased complexity.
  1. Normally where a lay Claimant is unable to get legal advice, then the lawyers representing the public sector Defendant would act as Officers of the Court and explain the procedure and what to do next to the lay unrepresented Claimant. But in this case the Defendant’s lawyers act in bad faith.  
  1. The Claimant received an email from Cardiff County Court 14 January 2020 at 15.08pm, saying the Claimant’s email regards not being able to understand the Order 31 May 2019, was put before HHJ Keyser QC who comments:-

”……the case was stayed until 9 January 2020. The stay

is now ended. Any application for relief from sanction

must be made promptly

  • The lay Claimant promptly makes this N244 application because the ex-parte hearing and Order of 31 May 2019 being controlled by the Defendant in the absence of the Claimant, is too far removed from the very obvious truth and facts of the Defendant’s agenda and actions in the 2009 Lewis Gun case at the Crown Court.
  • One main reason to bring an action that is a good use of Court time, is to stop problems continuing.
  • One problem is the aim of the Defendant in bringing the failed Lewis Gun prosecution of 2009 and the subsequent directly four prosecutions, was to prevent the Claimant address his Judicial Review and civil case where both were looming.
  • And that the Defendant continually prosecutes and imprisons the Claimant to obstruct and prevent the Claimant addressing his civil proceedings where the Defendant knows the prosecution papers and police information systems are not true.
  • The Order 31 May 2019 is too far removed from very obvious truth and facts of what the Defendant does to continue their 2008/9 agenda to obstruct the Claimants from taking and addressing civil proceedings by harming the Claimant each year since 2009.
  • So that the Claimant was imprisoned for five years due to blatant deceit by the Defendant, and particularly between 2016/17 to late 2019. – based on papers and police information systems where it is obvious the Defendant did not and cannot possibly believe are true or fair.

New evidence

  • But there is (and will be) much new evidence as to the extent that the Defendant works to harm the Claimant is actually via multi agency collusion and as explained below the deceit and malice by the Defendant and how they aim to obstruct the lay Claimant, – is getting even worse. And without the intervention of the Courts will be indefinite.

The Claimant lives in England and is not safe entering South Wales.    

  • An obvious need is for the case to be transferred to England so that the Claimant can avoid entering South Wales. As the Claimant lives in England not transferring the case would put the Claimant at risk of serious harm. 

Should the Claimant start a new civil action in England regards the Defendant prosecuting using information they know is not true and ask English Court for the Lewis Gun case be drawn into that new civil action?

  • From yet again being recently put in prison it has become obvious to the Claimant that he needs to bring a civil action to stop the Defendant bringing or provoking prosecutions based on details that they know is not proportionate, and so far from what is proportionate, is therefore not true.
  • The information the Defendant knows to be untrue but still continually uses that information to prosecute the Claimant, has arisen out of the 2009 Lewis Gun case. A new civil action would rely on the same papers plus more. The extra would be related the prosecution cases brought by the Defendant since 2009 to 2019 and ongoing. 
  • The Claimant needs to seek legal advice as to whether to state the new claim to include Maladministration, Malfeasance, Misfeasance and Malicious Prosecution (and even nonfeasance for colluding with a medical writer who acted seemingly criminally) as even if convicted a civil action can still be bought in rare situations, such as here where the Defendant cannot possibly believe their own prosecution papers as proportionate and therefore the Defendant knew the prosecution papers were not true. 

Malfeasance – Request to assist, include and monitor the Claimant’s pre action request of the Chief Constable regards 2020.  Or should this be a pre action protocol that is integrated into the Lewis Gun Case?

  • The Claimant seeks time and opportunity to take legal advice on the technicalities of these issues.
  • Possibly Malfeasance can occur if the Chief Constable does not in 2020 personally impose into police systems and procedures, new Decisions and measures by the Chief Constable that ensure the Defendant end their deceit in police information systems and particularly any response by the Defendants lawyers.
  • It can be said these 2020 issues have arisen out of the 2009 Lewis Gun case.
  • The outcome of a new claim around malfeasance could be a way to address the deceitful and dishonest conduct of the Defendant’s internal and external lawyers.

Directions of the Court on potential applications by the Claimant regards solicitors Adrian Oliver’s and Richard Leighton Hill’s conduct during proceedings before the Courts and Warning to Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill regards perverting the Course of Justice  

  • We are all aware responsibility comes with control and that Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill have high level of control over the Defendant, because any Police Officer no matter how senior cannot go against what the Police ‘senior’ lawyers says.
  • If Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill adequately communicate to the Defendant the truth of the horrific wrong that Dr XX has done and also communicate to the Defendant that the false information (see letter form Belinda Kirk 25 July 2019 regards the Defendant totally falsified that the Claimant is a risk to his family)  
  • It follows that the wrongdoing and potentially criminal acts of bring prosecutions based on what they know is not true has occurred quite directly as a result of Adrian Oliver’s and Richard Leighton Hill’s actions and inactions for which they can be personally liable before the criminal and civil courts.
  • The Claimant request Directions form the Court for a date when Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill update on and if that response regards correcting false information (See attached letter 17 July 2019 from Belinda Kirk) and admitting the wrong Dr XX does, is not satisfactory to give directions such as:-.
  1. As to how the false information and highly improper and potentially criminal actions and inactions of Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill be a part of civil proceedings
  • And/or the false information and highly improper and potentially criminal actions and inactions of Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill be part of a new claim in England
  • And/or that to maintain confidence in the profession and the Courts that the Court give Directions for a hearing to sanction and potentially strike off the roll Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill and they can apply to the SRA if the wish to be reinstated. 

Why the Defendant brought a malicious prosecution of the Lewis Gun case when they knew what they were saying was not true was to obstruct and prevent the Claimant in bring civil proceedings.  

  • The context of the Lewis Gun case was according to the MAPPA minutes to prevent the publicity that may occur with the Claimant taking civil proceedings where any normal person can be expected to veer towards thinking that so very many prosecutions there must be wrongdoing by police and those in authority who collude with those police. Please documents see as attached.

Request Order for Disclosure and an Order to read the Defendant’s lawyers documents.

  • Please would the Court Order a date, time and duration and a neutral location such as a conference room in Bristol or Taunton (at a Court or a business room such as a hotel conference room or lawyers firm) where the Defendant’s lawyers must allow the Claimant to read documents.
  • The Defendants lawyers are asked to be able to tell the Court how they will arrange the Document being made available at a neutral venue within easy travelling distance to the Claimant’s home in Taunton.
  • Please could the Court Order disclosure for the Claimant for the Lewis Gun case and also request the Chief Constable to decide the Defendant to stop their deceit 
  • As we are all aware In the UK there has been a major scandal at how police have improperly withheld disclosure at Criminal trials and this scandal is wider spread in the national media and is clearly acknowledged by the Police College who have new procedures to try to ensure police start to disclose adequately.
  • Please can the Court Order the Disclosure that the Claimant should have had in the 2009/2010 Lewis Gun case.
  • Please could the Court Order the Disclosure that the Claimant should have had in the four criminal trials from 2011 to present that have arisen out the dispute of a collusion regards false police MAPPA NHS medical report(s). Where the medical writer colluded with the Defendant via MAPPA in the Lewis gun case and when the Claimant makes protests at their deceit they both (Defendant and medical writer) prosecute the Claimant using information they know is not true. And they also do this to obstruct the Claimant taking civil proceedings regards their deceit and malice in the Lewis Gun case. 

The Claimant’s 2019 lay version of Further Particulars that worries the Defendants as too close to the truth. But did the Defendant obstruct the Claimant complying with civil proceedings by imprisoning the Claimant by a prosecution using information the Defendant knew was untrue? 

  • The Claimant complied with the Court Order to supply Further Particulars by a stipulated date and did so using a lawyer.
  • However, in February 2019 the Claimant could not approve what the lawyer sent to the Court as the Defendant’s arrested the Claimant that weekend in the middle of the period of Claimant meeting with his lawyer.  The lawyer could not meet the claimant in custody during an arrest period and did not know where the Claimant was but rather did a best effort at what the Claimant wished so as not to miss the deadline.
  • Furthermore, it is very obvious that regards at least proportionality or the excessive length of the prison sentence (that meant the Claimant could not meet with his lawyer) is due to the Defendant lawyers and the Defendant being deceitful before the Courts, as to the medical report being blatantly untrue. Or if the medical reports are true to first examine that a prosecution would not be appropriate but rather NHS assessment and care would be appropriate.
  • The fact the Defendant did not start with a reassessment of the medical states of the Claimant shows they brought a prosecution not believing the medical reports that the Claimant protests (or allegedly harasses) about, were true.  
  • Possibly the Court may wish to ignore and put to one side the Defendant’s lawyers panic at a lay version of the truth, until the Chief Constable responds to potential pre action communications regards “a management Decision” of the Chief Constable that there will be no further deceit by the Defendants on specific issues that will be raised?      
  • However especially as the lay Claimant has not failed to comply with an Order to submit Further Particulars, as he did submit a lawyers document on time, but it can appear fair, reasonable and common sense that a lay Claimant if doing a complex case himself for the Claimant to be allowed use his way of explaining the case by his “additional” lay document.

An example where the Order 31 May 2019 is not acknowledging obvious material issues – Please compare the Doctor’s writing with the Caswell Team’s medical evidence quoted below from 2009.  

  • For example we also have to consider that either the Defendant’s August to October 2009 medical report(s) of the Lewis Gun case mean that the Claimant has significant irreversible brain damage (where the rate of deterioration was said to be not known and needs to be monitored/reassessment). And is also delusional in a number of ways. And so should not be expect to cope with complying with Court Directions and Orders. Or if not given the unusual facts (for example that two Radiologists give a normal all clear result 28 August 2009) it follows for all parties should admit the Defendant’s medical report(s) as intentionally false, biased and malicious and so leading to how the Defendant has unlawfully imprisoned the lay Claimant for five years from 2011 to 2019 by the Defendant and their lawyers being deceitful at Courts and it has been the Defendant who has prevented the Claimant from addressing civil proceedings.
  • Please note some detail on the prosecution of cases since 2009 where the Claimant is accused of harassing the writer of the medical reports. If to keep things simple we imagine hypothetically that responses of the Claimant were excessive and so the conviction is not in doubt, we are then left with the prosecution papers are deceitful and dishonest because of if the writer of the medical reports was accurate and the prosecution was honest, then a man with significant irreversible brain damage and with PDD (Paranoid Delusional Disorder) would not have served 5 years in prison. In the well-known farmer Tony Martin who had PDD, when he was convicted of murder (shot at two youths escaping his property) he had a sentence of only 3 years due to PDD (Paranoid Delusional Disorder). 
  • If on the other hand, if the Defendants prosecution cases were to be honest and admitted the bias, deceit, malice and dishonesty of the writer of the medical reports, then either a prosecution would not have proceeded. Or the Claimant would not have served five years in prison because the Claimant would have been recognised as saying the truth that the public and profession need to know. Or the writer of the medical reports could be prosecuted for his exceptional dishonesty before the Courts and to police – on five occasions in five criminal cases between 2009 and 2019.         
  • It must be emphasised that the evidence that Dr XX (and so the Defendant and their lawyers) acted and still acts potentially criminally is very much more. What is said in this document is only a sample in order to be as brief as possible.

The Lewis Gun case 2009 Caswell Clinic Team assessment of the Claimant 

  • An additional dimension is that as part of the Lewis Gun case there was a team assessment by Caswell Clinic the result of which differed to what the doctor who colluded with the Defendant and the 2009 team report page 42 says that the Claimant is not delusion but

“…suffering from a significant degree of anxiety..”

and that

“…continued physical and psychological stress could

have an adverse effect on him in the future…”

  • Suffering from high levels of anxiety often means a person is not normally well enough to conduct complex legal proceedings at the usual pace and speed and would need to be given extra time and leniency.
  • We need to add the extra dimension and extra level of harm was caused by the Defendant’s quite sinister use of a collusion with multi agencies that the Defendant organised from 2009 to the present ‘and indefinitely’, is causing the obstruction that has prevented the Claimant from dealing with all of his civil claims.
  • As explained below the Defendant has been extending their bullying of the Claimant by a deceitful use of multi agency working that would damage anyone’s mental state, so that the Claimant cannot participate in his civil legal proceedings against the Defendant.
  • But then when the Claimant mental state is not the best, to exaggerate that as if the Claimant is a high or highest risk to the community.   
  • The Claimant seeks new Directions that recognise how the Defendant’s trend of deceit and malice within the Lewis Gun case has been continued each year. And the Claimant asks the Court that the truth and facts in the trend of what the Defendant actually does is allowed to become evidence before the Court.

Request Chief Constable personally confirm that specific deceit and dishonesty regards the writer of the Lewis Gun medical reports will not reoccur in prosecutions, any Court papers or in police information systems. 

  • It is therefore becoming obvious that the direction of the claims against the Defendant needs to be varied to address the main problem. Whether by changes to the present claim or by a new claim which can potentially be added to the present claim. With an emphasis on identifying the deceit and dishonesty and to prevent similar deceit in prosecutions and police information systems in future.
  • As we are aware the Chief Constable as the Chief of all police officers staff and lawyers and is liable for what they do. The writer of the Lewis Gun medical reports requested the loss of liberty of the Claimant and the Defendant has continued to use these obviously false reports as if true and accurate. To know how to make requests of the Court or to particularise papers the Claimant requests the Chief Constable personally makes the decision that South Wales Police and it’s information systems, multi-agency communications and it’s lawyers will permanently acknowledge that the writer of the medical reports of 2009 “did some wrong” so contrary to what arrests and prosecutions since 2010 to present, that the Claimant acts with genuine grievance and to specify as explained below

Example of a just some of the criminal case against Dr TW and police who colluded with him that the Chief Constable and Defendant need to act on.

  • The Claimant was Sectioned in August 2009 by the NHS doctor who colluded with the Defendant via MAPPA and potential could be true that the Lewis Gun case would have lost momentum if it were not for this NHS doctor

Does the Claimant have Significant Irreversible Brain Damage? Or is the Defendant dishonest to even a criminal level of deceit?

  • Please see as attached that by 28 August 2009 two Radiologist Dr Aisling Butler and then a second opinion check by Dr Gareth Tudor who are the experts employed by Dr TW’s NHS for being qualified and experienced to interpret Brain Scans said that the result was normal, which the Claimant understands as a message to all other doctors of an all clear.
  • Please see an update 30 September 2009 that Dr XX writes for the Crown Court to request loss of liberty by Section for another month where Dr XX says to apply for a Mental Health Act Section that

“Assessment

The Assessment of Maurice Kirk has concentrated on several areas, mainly the presence or absence of any mental illness and the presence or absence of any traumatic brain injury”       

  • But if we examine Dr XX report of 29 September 2009 which is used as evidence at the Crown Court, Dr XX has totally left out and hidden from the Crown Court that the two Radiologist 28 August 2009 have given a normal all clear result and Dr XX deceitfully states:-

“Maurice Kirk has been referred for detailed brain scans”.

29 September 2009 in point 7

“….suffers with dysfunction of the ventral prefrontal cortex

of the brain….further neuropsychological testing is required

to confirm the severity of such damage.”

29 September 2009 in point 8

“Maurice Kirk has evidence of significant brain damage …..”

29 September 2009 in point 10

  • When in truth the fact is Maurice kirk has already been given a normal all clear result but the deceit goes on to the final report by Dr XX of 19 October 2009 please see the extract attached.
  • Dr XX was the Clinical director responsible for training and controlling that doctors at Caswell Clinic did not go beyond their expertise.
  • But when the brain scan result is normal all clear by 28 August 2009 Dr XX knew he was being dishonest when he wrote formally to the Cardiff Crown Court as a part of proceedings to say there was brain damage while there was no evidence to say that, and if Dr XX was wishing to say there was brain damage Dr TXX knew he would have to use a doctor who medically qualified by trained and experienced in the interpretation of brain scans to provide written evidence.

Claims of Delusions and PDD Paranoid Delusional Disorder are obviously intentionally deceitful assertions that are not based on evidence.

  • Firstly it is not for a doctor when either writing for NHS records or giving evidence to a Court to determine facts and the decisions Courts should make. 
  • If a person is often prosecuted or subject to disproportionate attention by police, that is seemingly unfair Parliament has decided that people should sue the Chief Constable as a means to explore issues and gain accountability. But for Dr XX to say the Claimant is delusional he is persecuted by police Dr XX would have to determine the facts of the Claimant case as being totally without merit and the Defendant has not managed to do that.
  • Dr XX in 2009 implies the Claimant is mentally ill for being concerned as to whether the NHS would covertly put psychiatric medication in his food as if Dr XX says the NHS could never do that so the Claimant must be mentally ill. When DR TW would have known as Clinical Director that the Nursing and Midwifery Council in 2005 and Royal College of Psychiatry in 2008 gave guidelines on when to covertly put psychiatric medication in patients’ food.  
  •  Dr XX tries to discredit the Claimant by saying the Claimant is paranoid or delusional regards occasionally using the word Freemasonry. But the Claimant does not focus on Freemasonry and the oblique references the Claimant may make to Freemasonry would be no different to the National Assembly of Wales and for example one of its past leaders Rhodri Morgan who sought a ban on appointing Freemasons in some key positions. So that as the Claimant does not focus on Freemasonry any more than others the Dr XX would know there is no evidence of delusional behaviour.
  • Essentially every key assertion by Dr XX that the Claimant was delusional can be shown as that Dr XX knew he was being deceitful.
  • There is even a letter by Dr Rose Marnell 3 March 2014 (copy attached) saying there is no evidence of the conditions that Dr XX asserts the Claimant has. And indeed, many other doctors also, confirms a picture that is consistent with Dr XX being malicious and deliberately dishonest and totally deceitful.  

.        

New Witnesses

  • For example, not all in the multi-agency staff colluded but rather could not prevent what the Defendant did. Those multi agency staff from 2009 to present need to become witnesses. As well as multi agency staff who are hostile to the Claimant.  
  • Also the Claimant out of prison is taking statements from numerous people.
  • The Claimant has found a letter 1 June 2010 where the Defendant refuses to investigate wrongdoing by police in the Lewis gun case based on witness statements not disclosed to the Claimant.

Defendant’s influence means endless failed Disclosure. The Claimant now requests, yet again, Court Orders for Disclosure.

  • Caswell Clinic
  • HMP Parc
  • Parole’s Oasysis Assessment
  • Police eligible data where there have been applications since 2009 with MAPPA, MG6D and PII protected evidence having been applied for many times under Subject Access Requests.

Request for an Order regards withheld evidence regards Mr & Mrs Cooper who purchased the Lewis Gun were interviewed under caution but were not prosecuted

  • The Claimant requests an Order for Disclosure regards the evidence the Defendant withheld during the Lewis Gun case in 2009/10 regards Mr & Mrs Cooper who purchased the Lewis Gun from the Claimant
  • South Wales Police were in close contact liaising with Police in Nottingham. That caused Mr & Mrs Cooper who purchased the Lewis Gun from the Claimant to be interviewed under caution and there are tapes and records or why Mr & Ms Cooper were not prosecuted – when the claimant was which South Wales Police had access to and knowledge of but all of which was deliberately hidden from the prosecution process, the Claimant and the trial at Cardiff Crown Court.   
  • The Claimant seeks Order(s) for Disclosure from ‘all’ parties.

Request Disclosure of withheld statements from 2009

  • On 1 June 2012 Detective Inspector Holden of South Wales Police refused to progress the complaint into the Lewis Gun case when obviously there are issues that honest police would need to look at in order to maintain professional standards. But D.I. Holder inadvertently says of statements and evidence obtained by the Defendant in 2009 that were not disclosed to the Claimant in 2009.    
  • For example as a part of the deceit the defendant uses statements from people who are not expert in the relevant issues of firearms law relevant to why the Lewis gun was legal.
  • SWP deliberately and deceitful used quasi-experts to mislead where quasi experts are people or staff who are not experts but rather work a speciality and can useful expertise on what they do, But the quasi expert is not experienced enough to be an expert who can comment with expertise on the wider full picture such as being an expert on contradictions and complications of fire arms law such as is found in the 2015 Law Commission report and the 2009 Consultation.
  • As the Home Office Consults Police forces in a consultation ending May 2009 Police knew the legal issues regards the Lewis Gun within the law earlier in 2009. 
  • Disclosure can help show how the Defendant deceitfully and maliciously manipulated the evidence by not asking for comment to explain how the Lewis gun was legal because of it was supplied by the MOD/RAF
  • Disclosure can also show that the Defendant avoids issues like the debate and consultations say how any Police have a duty to assess if a gun supplied by the MOD/RAF (which can easily be modified to fire) used by genuine enthusiasts or not. But SWP police knew that the Claimant had sold a Lewis Gun he received from the MOD/RAF to enthusiasts and a museum and so no reason whatsoever to believe the gun was re-commissioned to use as a weapon.   

New Evidence – Legal Advice needed on new evidence is emerging and the transcripts of the 2009 trial became available to people in 2019 who are starting to respond with information.

  • If the Defendant had been honest in prosecution documents and if the Defendant had not colluded with the writer of the 2009 medical reports in 2009 would not have been in prison
  • Now the Claimant is out of prison and not restricted in travel by licence conditions the Lewis Gun case transcripts from 2010 have become available to people the Claimant is learning more.
  • The Claimant needs time to put all this new evidence together and request the Directions of the Court so that the truth can be evidence at trial. 

Directions on additional Further and Better Particulars to include how the Defendant manipulated and used multi agencies to harm the Claimant  

  • In proving a case at Court and addressing accountability, establishing a trend is important to show it is not just a one-off problem.
  • For truth to be come evidence and to avoid issuing new proceedings with a messy duplicate civil trial the Claimant needs Legal advice on how to add the actions how the Defendant has manipulated multi agencies in 2009 onwards to the present moment and 2020, which of means also including the writer of the medical reports, and the Defendant’s lawyers conduct
  • It must be emphasised that the evidence that Dr XX (and so the Defendant and their lawyers) acted and still acts potentially criminally is very much more. What is said in this document is only a sample in order to be as brief as possible.
  • As can be seen by all this events and the have been too much for a lay Claimant to cope with such complex civil proceedings and he request the Court set new Directions so that he can manage and include all the new issues and evidence.

STATEMENT OF TRUTH

I believe that the facts stated in this application are true.

Maurice John Kirk BVSc

Date 21 January 2020

CASE NO:1CF03361

& D00CF279

IN THE CARDIFF COUNTY COURT

MAURICE JOHN KIRK

Claimant

and

CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES CONSTABULARY

Defendant

List of Documents in Support of the N244 Application 21 January 2020

  DATE     Name   Relevance
28 Aug 2009 NHS Radiology Brain Scan results. Two doctors at ABMU NHS confirm a normal all clear result.
30 Sept 2009 Dr XX reports to the Cardiff Crown Court Dr XX hides the above from the Court and totally makes up that this is brain damage.
19 Oct 2009 Extract of Dr XX final Opinion to Cardiff Crown Court  
16 June 2010 CAA Medical says Claimant is fit to fly Obviously Claimant Maurice Kirk does not appear mentally ill or brain damaged as Dr XX says.
28 Nov 2013 University Hospital of Wales (UHW) Cardiff Radiology at UHW gives a normal all clear brain scan 
14 March 2014 Dr Rose Marnell Clinical Director at HMP Cardiff Says no evidence of any brain damage or PDD/delusion.
25 July 2019 Belinda Kirk (Oxford educated TV/film maker daughter of Claimant) Writes regards the Defendant falsely saying the Claimant is a risk to her and her family when Belinda Kirk says that is not true. .
     
     
     
Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments

‘Heroin’ for Alun Cairns MP & John Graham from my Prison Cell

 

Sample of stopped letters from John Graham with stamps, from my family and from Sabine MacNeill with no party notified

The South Wales Police again conspire to pervert the course of Justice yet again by having me gaoled for almost all year only to withdraw the two charges under the Terrorism Act, would you believe!

Anything to prejudice my ever increasing number of civil claims for malicious criminal prosecutions due to their deceit and cowardly incessant bullying of me when not, again, prepared to face up to cross examination before an English law court, at long last.

DataProtection@south-wales.pnn.police.uk 15:03 (14 minutes ago)  
to me
THE USUAL SOUTH WALES POLICE PREVARICATION

Good Afternoon

Please accept our apologies for the delay in the disclosure of your Subject Access Request

We are doing everything we can to minimise delays to providing a response however we are currently experiencing unprecedented challenges amid the COVID-19 pandemic which will affect our ability to meet our usual standards of compliance.  Whilst we will aim to provide responses as soon as possible, we are unable to provide you with an exact date as to when you will receive your disclosure.

Please be assured that we are aware of your request.

You have the right to lodge a complaint with the Information Commissioners Office regarding the delay however we would encourage you to read their information pages before doing so. https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/news-and-events/news-and-blogs/2020/03/data-protection-and-coronavirus/

Thank you for your patience.

cid:image001.jpg@01D46472.E18FE420     Kind Regards Sally Hillman
Arweinydd Tim | Team Leader
Rheolwr Rheoli Data a Datgeliadau | Data Management and Disclosure Unit
Pencadlys Heddlu De Cymru | South Wales Police Headquarters
(: 01656 303444 | Ext: 26662 |
  cid:image002.jpg@01D46472.E18FE420 cid:image003.jpg@01D46472.E18FE420 cid:image004.jpg@01D46472.E18FE420 cid:image005.jpg@01D46472.E18FE420
Maurice Kirk <maurice@kirkflyingvet.com> 15:16 (5 minutes ago)  
 

MY WELSH PRISON STOPPED LETTERS

Further to my today’s URGENT BAIL VARIATION APPLICATION, based on new evidence yesterday from  Mr JOHN GRAHAM (alleged recipient of ‘noxious white powder’ from my Cardiff prison cell) I now have damming corroborated facts that South Wales Police, whilst I was in Exeter prison deliberately perverted the course of justice re again stopping my prison letters to MPs, solicitor, family and Taunton GP

Maurice J Kirk BVSc  
Tel 07708586202          www.kirkflyingvet.com mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

 

It will take me a week to get through these illegally withheld prisoner’s mail by South Wales Police and G4S!

Dear Sis,

Owing to my visiting John yesterday, prior to his operation, caused me to now examine the huge pile of stopped G4S Parc and Cardiff prison letters that has been sitting on top of my kitchen cupboard since last year.

This pile almost untouched until now, kept for an ever-hopeful external police force investigation, had been set aside as I was violently ejected from prison on 1st Nov 19 in an act of robbery. These letters, meantime, were being handed back to my driver to take me directly to the nearest English casualty hospital unit across the Severn Bridge.

NB The bundle of my Cardiff Prison ‘stopped letters’ held in the F wing office, for all to see, was not amongst them . The large brown package, amongst that bundle was my two year vindictive prison term appeal from nasty judge Tracy Lloyd Jones who had the stupidity to even lie to my face when saying she could do nothing about (did not have the power’) to cause investigation into the blackmailed forensic psychiatrist’s Caswell clinic fabricated psychiatric reports that has resulted in ruining my family, veterinary and aviation way of life (see transcript) for 5 years of false imprisonment.

Your prison stopped April 19 letter to South Wales Health Board to me, for example, which is a blatant criminal conduct. My welsh police ‘interview’ will be quickly shredded this week, Avon and Somerset police must be persuaded to obtain my November 2019 101 call transcript as a classic example of the welsh police having again been refusing to divulge its content of such significant evidence undermining the prosecution’s cases including in machine-gun fiasco, to again fool the English authorities.

John informed me, after successful surgery, he never had a police interview for an MG 11 witness statement and yet I was charged and gaoled in May 2020 for sending him ‘white powder’ in a letter from my May 19 Cardiff prison cell only to be released in November. [Inadvertent tooth paste glue on back of a court transcript was the mistake].

 Prison staff told me, at around that time, after a 32 minute ‘cell search’ with two sniffer dogs(while I was was locked in the shower unit in my wheel chair) it was possibly ‘heroin’ as the same powder appeared same as one sent on same day to Alun Cairns MP

Could Enid Blyton have written better?

Alun has a plethora of documentation, of course, for criminal investigations on his own South Wales Police’s yet another failed conspiracy to secure my minimum 10 year prison term. I have had Alun on listening ‘watch’ about the appalling state of welsh courts, police and prisons for years. IT resulted in my being introduced in Swansea Prison, to Nick Hardwick the then HM Prisons Minister while in my wheel chair.

(TO STOP my 1CF03361 & BS614159  one million pound damages claims resulting from first and second attempts for infinite/indefinite incarcerations)

I have been denied copy of any of my 40/50 odd letters sent out to MPs and Avon and Somerset Police during my 2019 unlawful prison time nor have I yet found any of them in this pile of stopped letters, mainly coming into prison, violently returned to me on 1st Nov 2019.

 

John Graham’s letter bearing all too precious 1st class stamps I was denied , so often, in wicked welsh prisons

 

sample of my sister’s, Sabine MacNeill’s and John Graham May 2019 stopped prison letters by South Wales Police with none of us being notified
M
Copy of John Graham emails from South Wales Police

Subject: Statement

Good afternoon Mr Graham,

With regards to your previous email confirming your relationship with Mr Maurice Kirk and the fact that you had not received any mail containing a white powder, would you be prepared to provide a statement containing those details and your knowledge of a white powder discovered within letters that you believe to be toothpaste.

Regards

Dear Ms. Richards,

In answer to your enquiry I can confirm I know Maurice Kirk as an acquaintance more than a friend.

I must add I have never received any letter from him with anything resembling a “white powder” attached to it. I understand that this “white powder” in question, after formal forensic investigation, proved to be common toothpaste.

I hope this helps.

Thank you,

J. Graham 

 

BUT THE POLICE HAVE STILL NOT DISCLOSED previously ordered, under CPR, PII, MG6D and OASYS fabricated data , the latter used, incidentally, to have me persecuted for years in welsh prison as a (fictitious) wrongly convicted victim for ‘child abuse’, ‘firearms’ and ‘narcotics’, ,,,disgusting short arsed vermin. 

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

South Wales Police face Criminal Proceedings in England

MY LATEST BLOG ALWAYS ON TOP OF LIST OF BLOGS ON THE RIGHT

Welsh police confiscate my Caswell Clinic medical Records due to Dolmans’ Fraud

Appellant’s 22nd April 2020 Position Statement

1. Notwithstanding the fact that this Appellant’s contentious court cases primarily originate from South Wales with its unique jurisdiction it is never too late for a little truth, honesty and sense of fair play to prevail.
2. Notwithstanding the fact of a serious injustice concerning the division of the family’s assets, taking full advantage of his emotional mental state at the time and absence of proper legal representation, the current removing of the Respondent’s name from French property deeds was always the prime responsibility of the Respondent from the moment the UK property deeds were settled.
3. Notwithstanding the fact that the Appellant had abided by 26th March 2013 court order, within the 48 days, the other party has not possibly due to there having been no financial incentive. This has left a substantial loss for the Appellant due to his inability to sell off the French properties.
4. Notwithstanding the fact the Welsh authorities had fabricated Appellant with false criminal convictions, including child abuse, firearms and narcotics, on 1st November 2019 had the Appellant violently evicted from the largest welsh prison with his arms viciously manicalled behind his back.
5. And for what purpose? It was for interested parties, in current Cardiff litigation, to obtain an unfair advantage by the seizure of all his legal papers and not even his clothes returned to the rightful owner.
5. The South Wales Police not only unlawfully controls HMP Parc by using both extreme and unusual bullying it has ensured nothing is done about its breach of Article 2 etc and theft of Appellant’s property.
6. Despite written complaints to both Avon and Somerset or Devon and Cornwall constabularies, to even recover his legal papers for this case, he is ignored.
7. Behind this travesty of justice is their notorious 10 year ongoing 1CF03361 police machine-gun conspiracy case (T20097445). This originated from the then Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, to save her pension, having ordered the unblocking of the barrel of an alleged WW1 Lewis machine gun previously in alleged Appellant’s possession.
8. Not only did the welsh police ignore the advice from other police forces in England but also RAF and Farnborough Air Show previous scrutineers all confirming it was NOT a firearm and so, in desperation, even painted the film prop from film ‘Gunbus’ a different colour in the hope of fooling the jury!

Thee Breton Houses FOR SALE £80,000


Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Tel 07708586202

http://www.kirkflyingvet.com
mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com
maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Posted in Uncategorized | 33 Comments

South Wales Police Corruption

Dear Rebecca Pow,                                                                                   17th February 2020

South Wales Police fabricated criminal allegations including ‘Child Abuse, Firearms (Trading in Machine Guns) Narcotics, ABH and FTA (failing to attend courts) etc

I am grateful for your seeing me concerning the police denying my Taunton GP my medical records.

 

My recent blog extract, below, on the decades of suffering under ‘South Wales Police Corruption’, affecting so many, points to proof of rampant criminal conduct when accountable to no one:

Re-elected Taunton MP, Rebecca Pow, inadvertently caused my imprisonment in March 2019 for seven more months and only released due to the fortunate intervention by a clearly irate HM Parole Board member from London that had been lied to for two hours with my sister witnessing it all.

The Chief Constable of South Wales Police had not only allowed the fabrication of seriously damaging criminal convictions, to cause me hell in his police controlled Parc, Bridgend prison but had also ensured the list included ‘child abuse’, ‘firearms’, ‘ABH’, FTA and ‘narcotics’! Police convinced my parole officer that I had sent to Stoke St Mary village, Taunton, possibly deadly anthrax spores in a prison cell letter causing it to have the village cordoned off from the public!

Would this ongoing conspiracy have anything to do with the then Barbara Wilding’s emergency 2009 MAPPA level 3 Category 3  ‘Operation Chalice’  meeting in Barry police station on the 8th of June in order to register me amongst the top 5% most dangerous in the UK in order I may be shot?

When an armed police helicopter, with 20 odd officers, had raided our house in St Donats, while we were enjoying afternoon tea in the garden with the springer spaniels, why was I then NOT arrested?

Was this to do with my being set up to be ‘shot’ (see leaked MAPPA category 3 memos) or their failed attempt (Operation Dandelion) in snatching our 10 year old daughter, Genevieve, to forced council care? It was to try and stop my civil claims, BS614159 etc, following the police’s 50 failed malicious prosecutions often denying me liberty during those decades of deliberate persecution.

South Wales Police Corruption ‘Ups a Notch’

I am arrested at my Cardiff veterinary surgery for theft of my own motor bike and gaoled in Cardiff prison for 4 days.

Poloice concoct charges of being in possession og a ‘garrotte type instrument in the pannier (embriotomy wire used on cattle dehorning on HRH Prince Charles farm and from ‘assaulting PC Philips who had thought I was possibly an escaped psychiatric patient.

This wicked police interview was deliberately withheld from all my civl proceeding for compensation with the final presiding judge refusing disclosure of any of the substantivre trial court records as they covered over 50 failed malicious criminal prosecutions. This tape was leaked revealing the level of SWP routinde corruption for which they are k nown world wide.

Police interview  20th May1993

Would it have had anything to do with the police then transporting my decommissioned WW1 Battle of the Somme Lewis machine gun 2000 miles around the UK, contrary to s5 of the 1968 Firearms Act, had they not, first, unblocked the gun barrel and having her painted a different colour to fool the jury to secure a mandatory 10 year prison term for ‘trading in machine guns’?

Who out there on cyber space would like a copy of the official machine gun trial transcript for a view on the trial judge , PAUL THOMAS QC, to see how internal ‘taffy politics’ command my destiny?

[South Wales Police ref 1900195556 ‘alleged Heroin sent to Alun Cairns MP’] [I900180883 ‘alleged anthrax spores to Rebecca Pow MP]. To whom do I complain?

Posted in Uncategorized | 18 Comments

Police Conspiracy to kill me foiled but will Burnett LCJ Rescue me again?

Burnett LCJ 2ndBurnett LCJ

Lord Chief Justice’s Annual Press Conference 2017

https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/announcements/lord-chief-justices-annual-press-conference-2017/

Machine gun aspx sm

Police repaint gun to try and fool 2010 machine-gun jury but not before frantically driving the antique almost 2000 miles around the UK, often with only one or two unarmed police in the vehicle , contrary to regulations because the Chief Constable had bloody well known from the start, the gun was recorded in aircraft CAA log books as decommissioned and proved , before trial by the new owner.

 

2000 miles to fudge the issue of a REPLICA machine gun

 

2000 miles to fudge the issue of a REPLICA machine gun

Last time, in February 2016, His Lordship had asked me to leave the public gallery and address both he and his colleague, Mr Justice Sweeney,  over my application following Mrs Kirk having been banned from ‘note taking’ on my behalf  by the South Wales judge, HHJ Crowther.

Welsh courts invariably hold me behind bullet proof glass to protect me BUT primarily to make sure I hear as little as possible in the hope their blackmail may lead to my confiding in my defence information  to one of their lawyers

Their Lordships bluntly quashed this one of manywicked practices carried out in the Welsh courts with gay abandon.

Will Their Lordships come to my rescue again , we all wonder, over the police’s attempt to having me shot on Barbara Wilding’s door step as one of the top most dangerous individuals in the UK?

Extract of email to my 112th law firm asked to protect me from incessant  South Wales Police bullying

Can you please confirm you are still acting for me in the case AND ATTENDING WITH QC I briefed in London with a witness?

I now have new information for the judge, HHJ Tracy Lloyd-Clarke for the lawyer, from a fortunate civil hearing only yesterday, 1CF03361 (machine-gun/murder conspiracy), that should lead to the release, at last, of police MAPPA and MACHINE  GUN CONSPIRACY RECORDS TO GET  MY POLICE PSYCHIATRIC REPORTS FABRICATED.

HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC also helped stop my civil claims, following their 33 failed malicious prosecutions aimed at me. Now,this week ,this machine gun judge refused to order specific disclose just as in the first 33 failed prosecutions or the wrong people would go to prison.

The police QC was made to admit to HH judge Keiser that HH judge Seys LLEWELLYN  QC refused to release those MAPPA minutes even when they had been delivered to court in  the proverbial ‘brown envelope’ in front of me containing their plan to having me killed.
 
South Wales Police were now ordered to disclose HH Judge Thomlow’s documentary evidence as well that he had used at secret HH judge Bidder QC hearing in Cardiff Crown Court to have me sectioned to Ashworth for rest of my life.
 
Their yet to be disclosed forensic history  of me contained their Caswell clinic I had diagnosed, with PROF RODGER WOOD OF Swansea university lying,  that I had a brain tumour making me so dangerous….MAPPA LEVEL 3 CATEGORY 3 (top 5% most dangerous) … I must not be told…….and never have been since.
 
Police, this very week, were made to allow my box of records, created from my near eight months in Cardiff prison during the scandalous 2010 trading in machine-guns trial fiasco, suddenly to appear after  about 5 years of apparently missing
 
Remember , HH Judge Seys Llewellyn QC had quickly ordered the destruction of my BS 614159 etc  court records, to block a RCJ appeal, relating to my first of many substantive claims for over two  million pounds,  after he had refused need for both standard and specific disclosure arising from over 40 police incidents.
 
I had dutifully released 50 odd arch lever files for BS case and they produced not one of relevance and I am now expected me to release my  intricate 2009 collated prison records of their daily criminal conduct.
 
Now, am I morally obliged to accommodate all these delightful people with disclosure they already have and appear to have gravitated to Cardiff’s so called law courts, civil and criminal?
 

The lying little bastards, in 2014, again told the court there were no bail hostels available, a habit of theirs to keep me in prison, just as they did this time , for next week’s court, ‘cannot find a welsh forensic psychiatrist to assess your fitness’.…. as South Wales medics are all too bloody  scared to counter any other South Wales doctor as it is NHS (Wales) controlled and NOT NHS (England).

My sister, Celia  and another, quietly made their own enquiries as to bail hostel availability, that January in 2014 both to be told there were plenty.

AND SO TO FRANCE,

. “I am just going outside and may be some time.”

Let us, before boarding, start considering HHJ Tracy Lloyd -Clarke’s Cardiff Crown Court’s hearing this week on Thursday or Friday, I forget which for the moment.

How police can withhold the truth, for eight years, surrounding my machine-gun incarceration now set up in both my T20170239 criminal & 1CF03361 civil cases to maximise world publicity of accepted routine deceit and corruption in the welsh law courts, alas, still part of the United Kingdom 

 

my stolen property out of spite

extract from 2009 court transcript:

my mistake.jpg

“My mistake” lying Thomlow mutters.

 

Lying welsh judge, Richard Thomlow, in my forced absence in cells below, informed the July 2009 court that both the seller and purchaser of my Lewis machine-gun were known to the police more than 6 months before my trial but kept me locked up to cause maximum disruption in my civil proceedings against them for their losing the first 33 malicious prosecutions, at that time, aimed against me.

As nine of the jury commented after acquittal , “Why were they not both also in the dock with Mr Kirk?”

Answer, because the court was presided over yet another corrupt welsh judge , Paul Thomas.

11 06 11 Paul Thomas QC

09 06 23 Foxy mg11.jpg

more extracts later

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 50 Comments

South Wales Police Squander Huge Amounts of Cash just to Preserve Their Chief Constable’s Pension

DRAFT

Police Stratagem to Arrest Maurice John Kirk or Get Him Shot

This is a very telling only just disclosed anonymous document from Dolmans’, the chief constable’s private lawyers defending so many of my substantial damages claims brought by me due to 40 odd failed police and Dolmans assisted malicious criminal prosecutions.

 

Aer signing the visitor’s book I am rapidly surrounded by armed police sporting tin hast and stun grenades

This Strategy memo was deliberately withheld from my T20097445 ‘trading in machine guns’ jury trial in 2010 as it again reveals the delay from South Wales Police seeing the replica Lewis machine gun on the WW1 DH2 replica biplane, advertised worldwide so many times, suggests that as ‘exchange’ of BS614159 witness statements’ with Dolmans was due no later than 4pm on the 19th June 09 by court order and I had already phoned earlier in the day and week on when and where will ‘exchange’ take place. It was abundantly clear to me Dolmans had no intention of expediting the court order civil trial had to be buried alongside me.

South Wales Police record that I went to Barry police station on several occasions indicating I needed to serve witness summonses on serving police officers., I left ones for officers, Inspector Trigg, Sergeant Rice and PC Nicholas Khilberg at least, eye witnesses on multiple arrest incidents concluding in my favour.

The 15th June 09 MAPPA level 3 meeting, in Barry police station, just down the road from my veterinary hospital included the police blackmailed doctor and senior social worker from Caswell clinic who’s notes also recorded that I was ‘likely to be shot’ in the planned armed police helicopter raid on our home, in South Wales.

Called under covert name, ‘Operation Challis’ a parallel planned raid was set up, if I was arrested and not shot. That was ‘Operation Dandelion’, which was launched as I was taken away in handcuffs to closed down Port Talbot police station for days of questioning. Police and social workers arrived at the family home to snatch our then 10-year old daughter, Genevieve, to be taken into Vale of Glamorgan Council Care as I was now a registered in the top 5% most dangerous MAPPA level3/3 victim.
.

Despite my arrest had been agreed on or before 1st June, at the police HQ AIG meeting many weeks before, it was further delayed by both 8th and 15th June 2009 MAPPA level 3/3 covert meetings in Barry and Bridgend police stations. Police records now release, 11 years later, that they already had known about the world-wide advertisement of my film replica ‘gun’ and knew exactly where it was in 2008.

Why? The Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, had just instigated her ‘shoot to kill;’ policy into the Metropolitan police force as if a parting gift from their Deputy Chief Constable. Her remedy for ridding herself of my continuing irritation and nuisance to the South Wales Police force, by generating such adverse publicity, was obvious.

It was also obvious both me and my 100 plus arch lever files, accurately recording both her and predecessor’s criminal conduct, including 40 odd failed prosecutions, was to be covered up in the bizarre Cardiff Civil Justice Centre hearings.

My BS614159 +10 substantial damages claims, in those days exceeded one million pounds in my claims for damages and Dolmans’ fiddled costs, alone, exceeded one million. Dolmans refuse to disclose the ‘break down of its bill of costs for fear of the media from proven fraud. I refer especially to the documents Adrian Oliver personally had drafted for both criminal and civil courts, for others to sign as true.

The manner in which Oliver had personally had me nearly shot on Sunday 21st October was from maliciously instructing one of his office staff to visit Cardiff’s central police station on the Saturday morning triggering the chaotic execution of Operation Challis and Operation Dandelion, on our quiet country home, was only partly prepared owing to the un fortunate absence of both Detective Chief Superintendent Stuart McKenzie and 2nd in command, Detective Inspector Suzanne Hughes, were considering on the Friday afternoon. “Why don’t I just ring up Maurice and ask him if he knows where the replica WW1 biplane went after he had sold it after flying his aircraft in the 2000 Farnborough Air Show”?

 

Yours for £130,000 with Carp lake

But on the Saturday with a signed Dolmans written complaint of my ‘threat to cause criminal damage caused Oliver, also wishing to hide adverse publicity, pressed that I should be immediately.

Under Judge Seys Llewellin, I only just recently found out was the most senior judge in Wales, had me banned from the Cardiff’s criminal and civil courts’ public counters for 10 years, making sure he left no tell-tale audit trail as to the real reasons why?

The same judge also attempted to bury his disastrously managed many weeks of oral evidence, from 99 witnesses, ever to see ‘the light of day’.

For a further16 months he delayed my appeal to the RCJ until sealing his 2013 inaccurate judgment on the day of his retirement and which had given sufficient time for the RCJ to say the laws had changed, meantime, making an appeal from Wales no longer available to the RCJ and only allowed to be heard in Wales!

Now refused at the RCJ’s HM Court of Appeal back to appeal BS614159 in the Cardiff Civil court, as I was now registered MAPPA 3/3 most dangerous with police continuing to deliberately concoct evidence to having me ‘lawfully’ shot to stop my civil claim ‘risk’ to her pension with the now new 1CF03361 two million pound damages claim, wrongfully prosecuted for ‘trading in machine guns’. Police had painted the dummy film prop back to black and had unblocked the piece of water pipe, imitating the gun barrel, in an attempt to fool the jury.

I had only the day before, remember on 18th June when I was well inside the South Wales Police’s Bridgend HQ and even had gained entry to the Chief Constable’s inner sanctum with my ‘exchange’ civil claim witness file tucked under my arm

 

Judge Seys llewellyn

Why didn’t anyone ask me about the film prop ‘gun’ then? About ten of them, many in ant flak jackets carrying automatic rifles, stun grenades and sporting tin hats surrounded me and not only searched me and my car thoroughly (an assault) only then allowed to leave, after rounding up my three legged terrier they had allowed to be let loose, After a senior female officer, Griffiths, conferred with Wilding ,refusing her to accept the file on Wilding’s behalf I quickly signed the visitors book as proof, at least to the judge, Seys Llewellyn, well , at least I had tried.

 

The Fabricated Facts to avoid the already doomed machine-gun trial

 

South Wales Police had painted the ammunition magazine from silver back to black and had unblocked the water pipe imitation ‘barrel’ to try and fool the jury

While we all hunted for our three-legged Jack Russel, Jacques, around the grounds of the police station I casually asked the police men present if their search had discovered any machine guns about or live ammunition for it?

I have always thought the premature arrest of me was a Mr Plod ‘knee jerk’ right hand on the 20th of June not knowing what the left hand was doing as it is revealed the statement of Dolmans’ hand written letter, dated on the Saturday 20th, while Detective Chief Superintendent Stuart McKenzie was in transit to a conference somewhere in England at the time, Adrian Oliver insistence I be arrested with no further delay.

Had he overlooked the ‘Foxy’ witness statement he had drafted just a week or so earlier for the police woman to sign ‘he’ had telephoned my wife who in tune had told me a woman had phoned enquiring about the WW1 Lewis machine gun with ammo for sale? Eight of the jury, after my 9th Feb 2010 acquittal, told me and members of my family it must have been first an undercover police woman now switched to a man giving the behind the screen to hide his identity. Possibly on maternity leave.

Having witnessed Adrian Oliver’s lies and read so many of his drafted witness statements for those to give evidence and had unlawfully failed disclosure incidents all screams bias in these welsh law courts so much so the welsh police were dependent on the power of ‘authority’ the same’ authority’ that adversely prejudiced my family’s Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons to cut off my income needed to fund the now ten or so damages claims against the welsh authorities including the police, HMP prisons and specifically named members of the Caswell clinic psychiatric prison just down the road from the G4S prison and police HQ,

All very cosy with almost all of the 113 criminal allegations thrown at me, while trying to practice veterinary science in the Vale of Glamorgan, came from the same close-knit police cabal but losing 89% of the malicious criminal prosecutions in court, if not withdrawn by the HM Crown Prosecution Service as plain stupid.

Prosecuted for ‘smuggling’ pigs into Ireland from a farmer’s field outside Cowbridge, in a 1950 two seat Piper Colt, seven times my refusing to produce any driving documents at all when ordered to by a uniformed police officer, for ‘speeding’ when it turned out the police representative , in court, had all the time, in his file, a clear photograph of the driver, one of my ‘work man’ that lead to an arrerst, a gang of South Wales Police had caused my Cardiff surgery front door to be smashed in by sledge-hammer to assist squatters to enter my premises, again, with the Chief Superintendent’s pregnant daughter and cause more substantial criminal damage are but a few of the CPS blocked criminal prosecutions once the truth, from my cross examinations, began to leak out.

It was the CPS, remember, as recorded in the June 2009 MAPPA level 3 meeting minutes was opposed, from the start, in having me arrested on once owning what may have been, at the time, a prohibited weapon. The CPS consulted and at the MAPPA meeting explained that it was my intent on serving at least 40 odd witness summons before trial commenced only to be achieved by following the daily ‘school run’ to respective homes as each police station, in turn, Cardiff, Barry and Llantwit Major had all refused ‘acknowledgment of service’ of £40 paid for at a time witness subpoenas. Even blocked at the airport for service on a air traffic controller, where I has intimidated by police with guns surrounding me stating that if I did not leave the Cardiff airport, immediately, I would be arrested.

That daft but dangerous incident arose in the frightening low level, even for me, police helicopter chase terrifying the pilot with me so much we had to put the D-Day cub down in first appropriate farmers very rough and almost too small 200-yard field.

Oliver’s misleading police signed MG11 witness statements, such as Barbara Wilding ‘s 6 weeks late affidavit ,contrary to court order and the countless other Dolmans drafted witness statements (almost 100 of them) some clearly bungled to be false, purported to be those of serving eye witnessing officers on their beat, over the years, had finally triggered my arrest due to a hoax ‘girt brick’ potential through his solicitor’s office window.

This left floundering police in Port Talbot police station that 22nd June 2009 night clearly not knowing how to proceed as they were now about to be faced with not just all the medical reports from Caswell Clinic already ordered, those of my own GP of 18 years, PEH specialists and hordes of CAA medical professionals all contradicting what they wanted, that I had relevant ‘brain damage’ and a ‘mental disorder’ of PDD sufficient for me to be locked away, for life, in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital because the planned assassination on me had gone ‘belly up’ due to Dolmans week-end interference to have caused someone senior to press the ‘panic button’ to launch Operations Challis and Dandelion.

The police were now faced with forensic psychiatrist, Dr Bridget Craddock, having examined me in the station, also stating the police black mailed Caswell Clinic doctor was a liar when misleading the MAPPA covert meetings.

The consequences of their joint actions caused the 5 years loss in my life, loss of my wife, health, wealth and damned near my sanity.

There are £1000 rewards to anyone who can significantly enhance my current predicament with donating new evidence in my civil claims against the Welsh authorities brought by an Englishman hoping for justice in a welsh court room.


Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Tel 07708586202

http://www.kirkflyingvet.com
mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com
maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

 

Posted in Access to Justice | Leave a comment

More machine-gun Conspiracy South Wales Police disclosed

The excuse to having me shot

 

watch this space

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Can any body send me these alleged Anti Muslim Cartoons as it is obvious a world-wide opinion is sought

ring 07708586202 or maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

thankyou

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

£10,000 REWARD for Caswell Clinic Psychiatric Report

A substantial reward for any one who can get me a copy of Professor Rodger Wood’s original September 2009 medical report of me stating, apart from other ridiculous data, my permanent brain damage, making me so MAPPA3/3 dangerous, was due to my ditching my D-Day Piper cub in the Caribbean and for having been a ‘long term drinking partner of actor, Oliver Reed’.

Upon my acquittal at Cardiff’s HM Crown Court on 9th February 2010 the lying little piece of sh– altered his report denying any idea that he was so qualified to interpret the X-Rays from a SPECT scan (just a psychology lecturer at Swansea University).

This original and now buried report, protected the forensic psychiatrist sufficiently to allow police blackmailed Dr xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx to apply to His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC, on 2nd December 2009, that I should be locked away, for life, in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital.

It may take another 10 years of my life just to get the Dolmans, solicitors, of Cardiff’s wickedly concocted police statements of June 2009, like those also now re-hashed ones of quickly promoted, to do my arrest, only to be rapidly retired South Wales police officers, Detective Superintendent Suzanne Hughes and Detective Chief Superintendent Stuart McKenzie, upon my acquittal now leaving me with their joint June 2020 witness statements, also drafted by Adrian Oliver, my ‘hot and sweeties’ to be circulated world -wide.

LET ME WARN YOU, I was locked up in Caswell Clinic for a terrifying three months under an illegally brought section 35 of the 1983 Psychiatric Act but with sufficient time to interrogate staff and police victims in order to assess what may be next?

R U NEXT?

As then, now and before, boys and girls in Wales are routinely being locked-up for experimentation or because some, like myself, are a threat to their police pensions

Adolph Hitler did it, Joseph Stalin before him did it and many despots since have done it which is why I call it ‘being dealt the Gulag card’. So, go speak to Patrick Cullinane and Norman Scarth (95 years old ex RN Arctic convoy’s sinker of the German battlecruiser Scharnhorst ) who both skipped country to escape the men in white coats and seek refuge, one in the heavens and the latter now in Eire.

 

Our Gen

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Covert Police Operation Challis to having me shot

 

Why didn’t the police simply not ring me up or drop round for a quiet chat to ask where my aircraft had gone to?Watch this space
Posted in Child snatchingUncategorized | 2 Comments

The Elephant in the Room

On 24th June 2020 Detective Chief Inspector Stuart Mackenzie of the South Wales Police was dragged out of an early lucrative retirement, the reward for what the local Taffia had told him to do, have me arrested in the hope of my receiving a 10 year prison term.

Mackenzie was to sign yet another one of Adrian Oliver’s concocted witness statements. Oliver of Dolmans , solicitors, Cardiff, had drafted a retrospective account of Operations ‘Chalice’ and ‘Dandelion’ in 2009 to have me ‘lawfully shot’. If that had failed the back-up police cars, also surrounding our home in St Donats, were also waiting, up the lane, with a Vale of Glamorgan social services team to take our then 10 year old daughter, Genevieve, to be taken into ‘care’. Why? Because the clandestine MAPPA level 3 category 3 meeting three weeks earlier in Barry police station had registered me amongst the top 5% most dangerous in the UK!

 

Oliver had already fabricated an oh so similar witness statement for the then Chief Constable, in February 2009, for Ms Barbara Wilding to sign as a sworn truthful affidavit. This criminal act of deliberate non disclosure of evidence sparked an early retirement, also, to protect her pension despite the blatant deceit in having me gaoled so many times only to be latter acquitted. This is why, of course, these now 20 police files have taken 11 years to reach the surface despite a string of failed court orders.

Detective Superintendent Stuart Mackenzie Retrospective Statement 24th June 12020

They had all lied by putting together Wilding’s 25th February 2009 sworn affidavit, as these 20 odd files of sensitive police material so portray but, of course, taking the lid off the ‘can of worms’ in their ‘Trading in machine guns’ conspiracy, trial T20097445, when no defence needed to be tendered for an obviously predicted acquittal.

A Helpful Chronology for New Readers

 

The ‘Elephant in the Room’, no one was to mention, of course, was because their chief constable was, at the time, defending the now notorious BS614159 plus 2 civil damages claims following police having lost 40 odd malicious criminal prosecutions. My resultant civil damages claim required as many as 300 witnesses with 100 of which being police officers, serving and retired.

     
So, did no one in the South Wales Police simply have asked me, especially while visiting police stations after the 29th May 2009 decision by Mackenzie and MAPPA to have me arrested?

I will relish doing a second statement on how the culture of South Wales Police compels otherwise good officers to do obvious wrong on this occasion Officers are called off normal duties to answer a  “Get Kirk” fatwa. Tis corrupting cultire at SWp puits the public at risk and officers more senior than McKenzie would be involved:-  

The jury did not see these police at all believable or credible and here is spelling out each detail of why………

·        Critical – Who appointed McKenzie as SIO?

·        What was McKenzie actually to do because why such attention over a matter (couple of old cartridges with a dummy gun that if it could fire a single shot was too dangerous to actually use) is so simple a local constable could deal with by asking MK in for a chat and asking – ‘Where is this gun Sir?’  

·        Why does McKenzie say the policy decision of 29 May 2009 included ‘MK visiting HQ to arrest CC’ when that happened weeks later?  

·        If MK was to be a firearms risk …………why only with an era of gun too unsafe to fire? They show absolutely no interest in real risk of someone of MK’s clever ability going nuts and collecting real modern firearms   

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Machine-gun Conspiracy to have me Shot is now Proven

BLOODY FOOLS

 

Why did not Mr plod simply ring me up to ask where my Farnborough Air show aircraft was now?

OR, OR ask me, while I attended the four police station visits, between 29th May and 22nd June 2009, complaining of their bullying, the time when police HQ had finally plucked up their yellow bellied courage to arrest me over three weeks later when they thought it was safe enough?

I refer, of course, to ‘Operation Chalice’ , 20 odd, some armed police, with helicopter simply to have me shot and if that failed put the bloody fear into my wife and child by using social workers, trying to take our 10 year old Genevieve into Vale of Glamorgan care?

  1. Amazing 20 South Wales Police arch-leaver Defence Files, unlawfully hidden for over 10 years, including from my 2010 ‘Trading in Machine criminal trial , carrying a mandatory 10 year prison term, were only disclosed to me last week but only by yet another court order

Case number 1CF03361

In The Cardiff County Court

Maurice John Kirk

Claimant

And

The Chief Constable of South Wales Constabulary

Defendant

DRAFT                  Two Million Pound Damages Claim                  1CF03361

Introduction

A Disclosure of 20 lever arch files from the Defendant was received for me at Cardiff County Court on 12 October 2020. Dolman, solicitors’ QC told the bemused Judge Beard, residing,  that Adrian Oliver, partner in Dolmans of Cardiff, that he was refusing to serve them on me in electronic form for fear his ‘busted flush’, that has earned his firm m illions of pounds, so far, since their unlawful harassment of me started in 1993 , defending successive chief constables from 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions. The nefarious conduct of his client would be all over the websites, he indicated, in a matter of minutes if disclosed electronically. This would reveal the extreme level of police bullying and criminal conduct by so that many other in positions of privilege would be also published world-wide. I refer, of course, to far too many within in the welsh judges, HM Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) welsh prison administration and HM Parole Service (Wales)

  • The 20 lever arch files start with the first 10 files covering the original prosecution papers from 2009/10. There are five files that are a defence statement by Stuart McKenzie SIO (Senior Investigating Officer) along with his attachments. There are  five files that are a defence statement and attachments by the Deputy SIO Suzanne Hughes.

The evidence missing from Disclosure include

Little mention of the armed 20 plus strong police Operation Chalice helicopter raid to snatch our then 10 year old daughter or having me shot.

  • The Disclosure only goes back to February 2009. When the prosecution charges for both offences are dated over a year earlier:-

“…..the particulars of the offence being that between the 1st day of January 2008 and the 23rd day of June 2009, ….”

  • I ask for both explanations as to why such an obvious if not highly improper approach to deny Disclosure.  
  • Also missing is…. to follow Coopers’, buyers of aircraft, with ‘gun’ detained for interrogation on 1968 firearms Act allegations of alleged offences contrary to law.

Where the Defendant fails to provide a defence or explanation

  • The Defendant give no defence or even an attempt to explain why they did not treat me as others and ask the CAA to contact me. I challenge the defendant to explain.
  • The police give no defence on anything. What was the point? There QC, Lloyd Jones had already told the court he had been informed from Judge Keiser Qc I was not going to be allowed a jury nor would the hearing of evidence take more than5 days!!!!
  • The police give no explanation as to why

Critical flaw in arguments

  • Mr Cooper purchased the gun from me in August 2008 and he and many others made various changes to the Lewis display gun in the 17 months from sale to trial.
  •  
  • Additionally, Suzanne Hughes is then faced with Mr Cooper’s solicitor contacted SWP to say Mr Cooper will say the gun has been tampered with.
  •  
  • Suzanne Hughes tries to counter the obvious need to stop the prosecution by saying Mr Scott will cast doubt on what Mr Cooper says as unreliable.
  •  
  • But if Police are using Mr Scot to discredit the reliability of Mr Cooper as a witness as to the condition of the Lewis display gun. Then police have absolutely no witnesses and absolutely no evidence as to what condition the Lewis display gun was at the point of sale and in my ownership before that.
  •  
  • It follows South Wales Police and Suzanne Hughes knew with certainty that there were no grounds to charge, remand and continue with a prosecution.
  •  
  • Additional questions I seek answered……. To follow with further publications of docs created during my pranks to further expose their inherent deceit.
  •  
  • This exposed criminal conduct is set out in these 20 odd now released police files with such things as the 20+ police strong armed helicopter raid on our home, in the Vale of G Glamorgan on the 22nd June 2009 in Operation Chalice are unlawfully omitted from files.
  1. Aim to have me arrested/shot while the other police raid, a few hours later, to snatch our then 10 year old daughter, Genevieve, also withheld from court ordered disclosure.
  2. Also, no Nottinghamshire police criminal investigation disclosure, I had specifically asked for, in also detained Jerry and Jenny Cooper, the latter having collected the film prop from replica Battle of the Somme machine gun, many months before, police had plucked up the courage, for 27 senior police meetings in Barbara Wilding’s HQ, to press the action stations button. SUBSTANTIAL REWARDS FOR ANY INTERNAL INFORMATION from retired police…… maurice@kirkflyingvet.com tel 07708586202

A seven figure exemplary damages claim is due to come my way plus recovery of my huge costs in my defending this malicious criminal prosecution.

To be paid by the Chief Constable of South Wales Police Constabulary? No, in your dreams as Barbara Wilding, with her corrupt police officers, Adrian Oliver and others at Dolman’s, solicitors, Cardiff and other lying prosecution witnesses now face my prepared private criminal prosecutions.

The excessive perversion of justice, set out in these, until now, 20 police files, indicate a deliberately concocted plan stop my my numerous civil claims identifying welsh police’s 40 odd failed maliciously brought police criminal prosecutions,

PAY OUT TIME

All those who helped me be acquitted of all charges, requiring no rebuttal and while I was held in Cardiff prison for nearly 8 months, send in your details of costs.

Also a detailed statement on any aspect in the abuse of process of that shambolic two week highlighting any perverse issue you may have witnessed

Sky and another TV company have already expressed interest in a ‘documentary this usual and extreme level of deceit within senior staff of South Wales Police HQ in Bridgend.

contact me 24/7 on 07708586202 maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

The 20 police files will be published over the next few weeks to stimulate those who know anything about the CAA causing ‘gun’s on other British aircraft being frantically decommissioned

I will be handing out Cash, lots of Cash for info also on photos of My DH2 taken in august 2008 and August 2009 etc

 

WATCH THIS SPACE

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Abuse of Process Applications to Cardiff Courts

I have had delivered to Cardiff County Court my 25 page personal witness statement carefully written, for my readers from around the world, to simply reveal the multi thousands of UK’s funds simply to have me gaoled for a minimum 10 years, anything, just anything, to stop my million pound damages claim against the South Wales Police

 
 
 

the cause

for their 40 odd lost malicious criminal prosecutions case number, now blocked for an appeal , BS614159 plus 8

BUT THAT IS NOT WHY I enclose this early draft for RCJ on how disgusting the welsh penal system is- but who gives a dam other than those incarcerated ?

 

Exeter Crown court, shortly, will hear the outcome of John Graham’s prison stopped letters, a courtdisturbance to warrant the complainant being gaoled

 

As usual I buy all who attend a very good lunch, paid for in advance owing to the unusual ciecumstances all generated by the south Wales Police, chief senior prosecutor NS Evans Esq and His Honour Judge Di Evens not stopping this wicked situation from contimuing.

But, of course, the dreaded Covid 19 is endangering each of the above’s incomes with 5000 Crown court trials, is it, put on ‘hold’ so , of course they must boost their respective pensions by dragging on any futile case they can generate or however absurd and bizarre South Wales Police case they can throw at their ‘gravy train’ system.

WHY, for promotion as CPS Richard Thomlow had decided to quickly become a judge for criminally pursuing myT20097447 ‘machine gun’ criminal prosecution. Just as DC Hughes, female police officer that had sneaked into each day of my machine gun criminal trial despite, as prosecution witness, reporting evidence on oath, each day , as promised promotion which she promptly GOT!

JOHN GRAHAM, also a prosecution witness, has since tried to obtain return of his stolen communications with me, by Cardiff and Parc, Bridgend welsh prisons.

26 September 2020

REQUEST FOR AN INTERNAL REVIEW

Dear Mr. Jukes,

Creator of my inspiration to expose just ‘what really goes on in our law Courts’

Seeing as I am denied my F.O.I.A. [S.A.R.]  / Data Protection Act request sent already [and attached to this message] to yourself, and after receiving the letter below [attached also] from a Mr. Jason Jenkins, a “Disclosure Officer” of S. Wales police I hereby ask for a formal internal review regarding the denial of my request.

It is believed the S. Wales police force does have the letter referred to in my request as Mr. Kirk was criminally charged and remanded in custody connected to the letter addressed to myself [amongst others] written by Mr. Kirk whilst previously resident in prison earlier in 2019, the letter allegedly having allegedly a possibly noxious “white substance” on it. This letter was stopped from being sent to myself by prison authorities / police at the time. The criminal charge of the letter which was attempted to be sent to myself has subsequently been dropped by the CPS.

I have already sent 3 forms of ID pertaining to myself after your request for ID.

For your information, the addition / amendment not sent with my written request, which was sent to Mr. Jukes at the S Wales police HQ at Cowbridge Rd. via recorded delivery R. Mail, is:

” Sent: 18 September 2020 10:59
To: matt.jukes@south-wales.pnn.police.uk <matt.jukes@south-wales.pnn.police.uk>
Subject: F.A.O.: Chief Constable Mr. M. Jukes, S. Wales police – Update to my F.O.I.A. / Data Protection Act / S.A.R. request

TO: Chief Constable of S. Wales police: Mr. M. Jukes, Police HQ., Cowbridge Rd., Bridgend, S. Wales,  CF31 3SU

FROM:  Mr. J. G. Graham

18 September 2020

UPDATE TO MY F.O.I.A. / D.P.A. Request to the Chief Constable Mr. M. Jukes, dated and sent 17 Sept. 2020:

Dear Mr. Jukes, Chief Constable of S. Wales police:

Please refer to my F.O.I.A. request to you, sent via R. Mail and also attached to this message. I apologise for leaving out an important part of my FOIA / Data Protection Act / S.A.R. request to you – that is:

Mr. Maurice Kirk [d.o.b. 12/03/1945, Somerset, UK]  was charged by the police in mid-2020 with:

” attempting to send a substance which caused distress to another [approx. May 2019] – the letter was stopped from leaving the prison last May 2019″

Mr. Kirk was in prison at the time of sending this letter, it being addressed to myself prior to it being stopped from leaving the prison, by authorities. This charge to Mr. Kirk was subsequently dropped in approximately June 2020.

My FOIA requests asks for a copy of this letter which was stopped as it had an alleged “substance” on it which might [qu.] “caused distress to another” [unqu.] – as it obviously exists as Mr. Kirk was charged with attempting to send it to myself. I request any other letters pertaining to myself that were not sent to me from either HMP Parc or HMP Cardiff from Mr. Kirk, during the times Mr. Kirk was resident in either of these prisons, whether they had any alleged “substances” on them or not.

The letter relating to the charge that was dropped for Mr. Kirk was referred to in part by the S. Wales police officer who wrote by email to myself – a copy of that email dated 06th July 2020 from officer “Brynsley Richards” of S. Wales police being sent with my 1st and original FOIA request letter to you sent on the 17 September 2020 via Royal Mail Recorded Delivery 1st class.  My F.O.I.A. request and attachment is attached to this email.

Thank you.

signed:  J. Graham

Posted in Uncategorized | 25 Comments

Welsh Court Corruption Crosses the River Severn

I have, again, just witnessed our UK’s oh so outdated but lucrative self-generating judicial industry, Buckland’s dream for both England and Wales’ law courts to promote huge wealth only amongst themselves, if my recent scandalous court proceedings is anything to go by!

Buckland: united Wales and England ‘best for the law’

South Wales Police used HMP Parc South Wales and HMP Cardiff to obtain my five years behind bars as I had published proven facts in my many civil claims against the bullies while simply seeking compensation.

This fabricated protracted imprisonment was dependent on their now sacked police blackmailed doctor originating from their psychiatric unit by South Wales Police cruelly provoking a ‘menage a trois’ like conspiracy within their walls in order for the doctor to maliciously falsify my medical records when deemed unfit to practice.

Where South Wales Police failed fabricated prosecutions really kicked off, in 19193, to my current posting heroin to an MP in Westminster by Cardiff prison letter also doomed to failure leaving only one outstanding, apparently, so watch this space!

This simple fact has been ruthlessly covered up by no less than twenty welsh judges over the past 10 years.

Why? Back in the 90s the bullying South Wales Police had lost over 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions which had justified attempts for a mere Englishman seeking civil redress in a welsh court, gaol.

By my almost 39 years of civil claims, such as 90’s cases, BS614159 and now 8 more, are used as a proverbial ‘shuttle-cock’ between RCJ’s HM Court of Appeal and Cardiff’s so-called Civil Justice Centre, to delay and delay, so Buckland can sneakily obtain, for the land of his father’s, judicial autonomy to promote welsh avarice.

This self-promoting verbal diarrhoea, for personal gratification in our UK’s judicial system is simply a ‘smoke screen’ with those in positions of privilege answerable to no one and clearly include, ‘giving not a fig’ for their own draft ‘rule of law, current Lord Chancellor’s for his mates.

 

flaking police painted silver paint to fool the Cardiff Jury

Before I refer to the most recent court public scandal, all originating from South Wales perverse authorities, I touch on another South Wales Police malicious attempt to have me sectioned to Ashworth, for life, due to their failed malicious criminal prosecutions. My ‘trading in machine guns’ to ‘shoot the Lord Mayor of Cardiff only concluded with an ignominious Cardiff Crown court acquittal, requiring no defence and a fine of £50 never to be paid.

This is due in a Cardiff court on Monday, 12th October 2020 but the 10 years of unlawful failed disclosure, contrary to CPR, is common place in welsh law courts.

I made an application, nearly a year ago, to the welsh prison authorities, for the return of my very great number of prison stolen letters from within those prison walls but who cares was their reply. Some of my letters from within had even been written for my criminal appeal for a wicked severely unjust two-year prison term for simply having spoken the truth. That was why.

Can you imagine living with a false psychiatric report while trying to fly the world in some WW2 aircraft? I have been unfairly gaoled in numerous foreign counties due to this travesty of justice but not a judge in Wales has the moral fibre to resolve the ongoing situation.as all are simply waiting for me to die.

My stolen HM Royal Courts of Justice bound letters included, would you believe, even those from their own prosecution witnesses against me such is the venom within these welsh authorities. John Graham Esq’s dozen or so letters were stopped by both HMP Cardiff or HMP Parc with many full of much needed 1st Class postage stamps. He was their own prosecution witness!

The welsh have made a complete fool of the English court authorities, where that particular criminal allegation was concerned, quashed on the first opportunity once it had been transferred to England and because my letters to the then HM Secretary of State for Wales Alun Cairns, seeking help, were amongst the stopped prison letters by G4S and HMP Cardiff.

I have just been to yet another pre-arranged law court, I am not allowed to name, so as to cover up welsh authority fraud, is not the ‘first’ time for me! But to hear the presiding judge admit he could not properly consider my applications for freedom, over an 18-month period, was enough for me to gather up my court files and walk out in utter disgust.

He did not even order the release of my stolen court papers, within the stolen prison letters, despite my letting the court system know so long in advance. Was it all a big game for him as my 12th October 2020 1CF03361 ‘trading in machineguns’ claim had originated in Wales or was its one million pound civil claim was now not enough?

Apparently, it turned out that the welsh authorities, for over the past 18 months, had been circulating these my prison stopped letters, confidential legal papers and Caswell Clinic medical records, robbed from me by G4S prison staff on my 1st November 2019 to Dolmans, solicitors and CPS both defending the South Wales Chief Constable.

This meant all had to be withheld from the current presiding judge as far too embarrassing for this foreigner, like him, in an English court of all places, could not be tainted with the South Wales Police’s latest conspiracy in order to pervert the course of justice.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

source: https://mauricejohnkirk.com/2020/11/03/threat-to-kill-lord-mayor-of-cardiff-re-secretary-of-state-for-wales/

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Archive [here] continues [from 2011]

 

 

Comment    See all comments    Like

Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police.
Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://mauricejohnkirk.com/2020/11/05/police-steal-my-three-million-pound-damages-claim-papers/

Archive [here] continues [from 2011]

https://www.butlincat.com/?s=maurice+kirk

Maurice’s site is “Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police” https://www.mauricejohnkirk.com

Email:  maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Maurice Kirk: SHOCKING MALFEASANCE BY SWP + THE COURTS: “Threat to Kill Lord Mayor of Cardiff re Secretary of State for Wales” 03 Nov. 2020 + archive

Threat to Kill Lord Mayor of Cardiff re Secretary of State for Wales

Let us, Ladies and Gentlemen, not forget that the South Wales Police, so desperate in order to stop my BS614159+10 other substantial civil claims for damages progressing, for their losing 40 odd malicious criminal prosecutions, will stop at nothing now, to save their pensions, to have me gaoled for another 5 year prison term in their latest fabricated allegation of sending heroin from my Cardiff prison cell to the then HM Secretary of of State for Wales, Alun Cairns MP.

????

This current fabricated criminal allegation, carrying for me a 5 to 10 year prison term that I sent John Graham Esq possibly anthrax spores by post from a welsh prison cell, when all knew it was simply prison issue toothpaste for gluing key docs to my prison cell, is , was and will be proved in court that the South Wales corrupt police force, again fabricated the whole thing, we all patiently await for!!!!!!!

An MP refusing to reply to John Graham Esq’s reasonable letter, asking for help, at last, but bust open the long run Welsh prisons /South Wales Police routinely stopping of prisoners’ letters both in or out of their welsh prisons with neither the proposed recipients nor senders being officially notified.

Meantime, my Taunton County Court will be busy over the remaining car also, of course , was stuffed with my 1CF03361 One million pound ‘trading in machine guns’ claim, following yet another South Wales Police failed malicious prosecutions

.watch this space, today

we have evil welsh bstds on the run

The police stolen legal papers in the Volvo and Citroen will be settled in a Taunton County Court

PRISON STOPPED LETTERS

Mr Mr Cairns MP, (posted 3rd November 2020)

1) G4S run HMP Parc, Bridgend, has again confirmed my letters to you from that prison, during during 2009 and 2020, were either stamped, following HM approval and sent on to you or they were destroyed.

Criminal Conduct

2) I therefore, ask, again, for copy of my letters that reached your offices, during the time I was severely harassed by the South Wales Police, in order that I can pursue £500,000 damages claim currently lodged in the Taunton high court.

3) In particular, I am concerned with the whereabouts of my letter to you found in my cell by G4S following a 32 minute cell search with sniffer dogs, while I was locked in the shower block in my wheelchair on or about the 19th May 2019.

4) Other MP letters were also purloined by G4S addressed to MPs following the incessant conduct of your bullying and deceitful police force.

5) My stamped addressed letter to John Graham Esq was also allegedly found in my cell with the G4S refusing to return or admit they have destroyed that letter alone with yours.

6) I am confident, at this stage, you will not be required to examination before any court over this serious matter.

7) I wrote to you earlier on how the prison staff under police instruction, no doubt, were witnessed by many prisoners in the act of stopping over 30 of my letters from even leaving the prison wing office! They included my appeal to HM Court of Appeal over a vindictive 2 year prison term for simply having reported criminal conduct by a doctor whilst in Cardiff’s police station and law courts.

6) To whom do I complain if an MP fails even to communicate with a constituency member even when he was desperately seeking serious help, a duty bestowed on any MP in the UK?

thankyou

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dolmans Solicitors Police Fraud

Adrian Oliver, senior partner, continues to enjoy immunity to criminal prosecution, only because he is in Cardiff and because he is defending the South Wales Chief Constable in Barbara Wilding’s 2009 ‘machine-gun’ conspiracy when attempting to having me shot.

To have me shot for welsh police losing over 40 malicious criminal prosecutions.

Now, the machine -gun civil claim enters its 11th year not a patch on my civil claim BS614159 etc (40failed prosecutions) as that goes on now into its 3rd decade, not unlikeJarndyce and Jarndycein dickens’ Bleak House.

Why? well the corrupt welsh first stopped my entering the court building for nearly 10 years, to slow me down and because the HM Royal Courts of Justice are refusing, due the stench of it, to allow to hear my appeal with its transcripts and court log records confiscated — what really goes on in our welsh law courts.

The police bullying continues…….

CASE NO:1CF03361

& D00CF279

IN THE CARDIFF COUNTY COURT

MAURICE JOHN KIRK

Claimant

and

CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES CONSTABULARY

Defendant

This is an N244 Application (Cases 1CF03361 and D00CF279) to vary and remove all sanctions in the Order 31 May 2019 and for Directions as to how to proceed when not understanding past Court Directions and Orders. And is made in response to a Cardiff County Court email message 14 January 2019 to the unrepresented Claimant from HHJ Keyser QC, kindly explaining the meaning of the Order 31 May 2019 that the stay is lifted as from 9 January 2020 and the Claimant should now make this application promptly.

Introduction

.

  1. The Defendant have for ten years stood by what Dr XX says in his reports as a part of the Lewis Gun prosecution 2009 as true reliable fair and accurate. Yet as a part of this Lewis Gun case Dr XX in his report to the Cardiff Crown Court 30 September 2009 point 11 says:-

“…My current preliminary position is that whilst Maurice Kirk is fit to plead, his difficulty in organising ……as a result of brain injury……..he would be unable to conduct his own defence”

  • As Dr XX says the Claimant has significant “irreversible” brain damage it follows that by what Dr XX says in 2009 may apply in 2019 so that the Claimant would be unable to organise a complex case at a Court.
  • If the Defendant does not stand by Dr XX as being true reliable fair and accurate then that opens up how the Defendant has maliciously and dishonestly imprisoned the Claimant from 2011 to 2019 based on prosecution papers that the Defendant knew was untrue and as a way to obstruct the Claimant’s ability to progress his civil proceedings. Which the Claimant believes is what has happened. 
  • Importantly to understand the deceit by the Defendant and prove they have done wrong by dishonesty at the Courts and to have interfered with the Claimant’s ability to progress civil proceedings, we do not need to go into whether the Claimant was guilty of harassment of the doctor who wrote false and malicious reports.
  • We only need to look at how the Defendant when bring prosecution deceitfully portraying the doctor as all good having done no wrong and the Claimant as all bad. So that the sentencing and subsequent harsh treatment was grossly disproportionate for the Claimant ‘rationally’ saying the truth that under the Section 12 annual and periodic renewal process of Mental Health Act 1983, the public and UK wide profession needs to know.
  • It is the proportionality of the sentence and harshness of the treatment there after, as a result of deceit, malice and dishonesty (by not admitting the serious, if not criminal wrong Dr XX does) is actually how the Defendant has interfered in the Claimant’s ability to progress his civil cases and the Lewis Gun case civil claim.      
  • In short the Defendant has directly and indirectly deliberately triggered so many problems for the Claimant that a normal person could not manage Court procedure and deadlines with the Defendant causing so many civil and criminal proceedings and disputes, all with intense detail and while the Claimant has a loss of liberty with legal papers confiscated and formal post to and from Courts and relevant parties blocked or withheld.
  • While experiencing loss of liberty the Claimant had a number of potentially serious health issues where because the Defendant triggers the Claimant be dealt with harshly so that access to care became an embroiled dispute. And physical assaults occurred on top of potentially serious physical medical problems. Yet while all this occurred the Claimant was left without adequate medical care.
  • Also from what the Defendant caused while at the Bail Hostel for a short period, the Claimant was singled out for a different set of conditions which were far stricter and harsher regime to his peers. Again this led to more dispute casework.   
  1. The problems and number of disputes and issues are by far too many, too detailed and too hard going for the Client/lawyer relationship to cope. And the cost of trying to fight back in defence using lawyers is far too expense for any lay person.

The Defendant Interfered and obstructed the main substantive civil case hearing in Cardiff in 2013

  1. The Claimant takes this opportunity to point out that the Defendant improperly used one of the four criminal prosecutions over Dr XX (based on evidence they knew was untrue) to prevent the Claimant being able to organise and have essential police evidence and witnesses in the 2013 main BS614159 substantive hearing into the wrongdoing by South Wales Police.   

The Claimant is not understanding what to do.

  1. The unrepresented lay Claimant genuinely cannot understand Court Orders and what is required of him and that includes how he was supposed to respond in case D00CF279. The Claimant does not understand how to go about listing his Document when the Defendant’s lawyers block the Claimant reading their Documents. And other example is, do Documents listed in the Further Particulars need to be again listed in a list of Documents?    

The Defendant provoke problems from Multi Agencies as a way to obstruct the Claimant from taking part in civil proceedings

  1. Regards the material time to comply with Court Orders. It took all manner of failed attempt by lawyers to try to urgently protect the Claimant by addressing huge problems, to only then realise that the Claimant and Claimant’s lawyer’s time is wasted trying to get an organisation to treat the Claimant fairly if the Defendant as police (and senior police) use their authority to tell the organisation to do different and the Defendant as police impose organisations use false information and cause organisations to treat the Claimant harshly and unfairly .
  1. When the Lewis Gun case prosecution failed and the Defendant has use and continue obvious events within the Lewis Gun case to imprison the Claimant each year since the Lewis Gun case ended in 2010.
  1. A simple way to get through a decade of detail is to compare the 2008/9 Lewis Gun case with the last prosecution by the Defendants knew what they saying was not true fair reasonable or proportionate.
  1. The Defendant as senior police control Multi Agency working and the information on which multi agencies make decisions regards the Claimant.  
  1. Intensely false criminal records – including child abuse and fire arms Narcotics, ABH and FTA false convictions. So many false entries the problem is hard to deal with.
  • False and wildly exaggerated risk assessments are caused by endless untrue comments on top of a false criminal history. So many false comments they are hard to deal with.
  • Being wrongly regarded as very high risk causes loss of liberty and rights to further obstruct the Claimant and triggers he be treated harshly and unfairly. Which again leads to so very many problems and disputes they are hard to deal with.
  • The Defendant triggered obstructing if not blocking access to health care leading to considerable hardship and more disputes that arise where they resist the Claimant be allowed his basic rights. Which over the last two-year sentence led to so many problems and disputes they are hard to deal with.
  • Parole decisions were based on false data maliciously supplied by police to cause extra prison terms in all convictions and in both prison recalls
  • The G4S subculture take it upon themselves that given the Defendant senior police say such of the Claimant that G4S not only can obstruct the Claimant’s legal papers and proceedings but are free to subject the Claimant to beatings and bullying and also to get the fellow violent prisoners to do same to the Claimant. Again, there were so many incidents which are also part of a prison dispute system it is all too much and too difficult to cope with.
  • Things became so wild that when the Claimant sent the usual harmless letters to his English and Welsh MPs streets were sealed off and the Claimant interviewed under caution in case the very small residue of the Claimant’s toothpaste on the back of his letters posed a most serious risk to the public and Members of Parliament. Again, the Defendant saw to it that this ongoing episode was not a small matter so that again made it hard for the Claimant to manage all of the above and the civil proceedings. 
  • The Claimant personal life has turmoil from similar outside of prison and his lawyer along with family has to try to address matters there.
  1. So many intense problems were occurring that the volume of quite unnecessary work caused by the Defendant becomes unmanageable for the Claimant and the huge volume and intensity would undermine any lawyer client relationship and be far too expensive for a normal lay Claimant.      

Claimant needs the Court to explain what is expected of him.

  1. The Claimant needed and still needs the Court to explain to him what was and what now is required of him given the increased complexity.
  1. Normally where a lay Claimant is unable to get legal advice, then the lawyers representing the public sector Defendant would act as Officers of the Court and explain the procedure and what to do next to the lay unrepresented Claimant. But in this case the Defendant’s lawyers act in bad faith.  
  1. The Claimant received an email from Cardiff County Court 14 January 2020 at 15.08pm, saying the Claimant’s email regards not being able to understand the Order 31 May 2019, was put before HHJ Keyser QC who comments:-

”……the case was stayed until 9 January 2020. The stay

is now ended. Any application for relief from sanction

must be made promptly

  • The lay Claimant promptly makes this N244 application because the ex-parte hearing and Order of 31 May 2019 being controlled by the Defendant in the absence of the Claimant, is too far removed from the very obvious truth and facts of the Defendant’s agenda and actions in the 2009 Lewis Gun case at the Crown Court.
  • One main reason to bring an action that is a good use of Court time, is to stop problems continuing.
  • One problem is the aim of the Defendant in bringing the failed Lewis Gun prosecution of 2009 and the subsequent directly four prosecutions, was to prevent the Claimant address his Judicial Review and civil case where both were looming.
  • And that the Defendant continually prosecutes and imprisons the Claimant to obstruct and prevent the Claimant addressing his civil proceedings where the Defendant knows the prosecution papers and police information systems are not true.
  • The Order 31 May 2019 is too far removed from very obvious truth and facts of what the Defendant does to continue their 2008/9 agenda to obstruct the Claimants from taking and addressing civil proceedings by harming the Claimant each year since 2009.
  • So that the Claimant was imprisoned for five years due to blatant deceit by the Defendant, and particularly between 2016/17 to late 2019. – based on papers and police information systems where it is obvious the Defendant did not and cannot possibly believe are true or fair.

New evidence

  • But there is (and will be) much new evidence as to the extent that the Defendant works to harm the Claimant is actually via multi agency collusion and as explained below the deceit and malice by the Defendant and how they aim to obstruct the lay Claimant, – is getting even worse. And without the intervention of the Courts will be indefinite.

The Claimant lives in England and is not safe entering South Wales.    

  • An obvious need is for the case to be transferred to England so that the Claimant can avoid entering South Wales. As the Claimant lives in England not transferring the case would put the Claimant at risk of serious harm. 

Should the Claimant start a new civil action in England regards the Defendant prosecuting using information they know is not true and ask English Court for the Lewis Gun case be drawn into that new civil action?

  • From yet again being recently put in prison it has become obvious to the Claimant that he needs to bring a civil action to stop the Defendant bringing or provoking prosecutions based on details that they know is not proportionate, and so far from what is proportionate, is therefore not true.
  • The information the Defendant knows to be untrue but still continually uses that information to prosecute the Claimant, has arisen out of the 2009 Lewis Gun case. A new civil action would rely on the same papers plus more. The extra would be related the prosecution cases brought by the Defendant since 2009 to 2019 and ongoing. 
  • The Claimant needs to seek legal advice as to whether to state the new claim to include Maladministration, Malfeasance, Misfeasance and Malicious Prosecution (and even nonfeasance for colluding with a medical writer who acted seemingly criminally) as even if convicted a civil action can still be bought in rare situations, such as here where the Defendant cannot possibly believe their own prosecution papers as proportionate and therefore the Defendant knew the prosecution papers were not true. 

Malfeasance – Request to assist, include and monitor the Claimant’s pre action request of the Chief Constable regards 2020.  Or should this be a pre action protocol that is integrated into the Lewis Gun Case?

  • The Claimant seeks time and opportunity to take legal advice on the technicalities of these issues.
  • Possibly Malfeasance can occur if the Chief Constable does not in 2020 personally impose into police systems and procedures, new Decisions and measures by the Chief Constable that ensure the Defendant end their deceit in police information systems and particularly any response by the Defendants lawyers.
  • It can be said these 2020 issues have arisen out of the 2009 Lewis Gun case.
  • The outcome of a new claim around malfeasance could be a way to address the deceitful and dishonest conduct of the Defendant’s internal and external lawyers.

Directions of the Court on potential applications by the Claimant regards solicitors Adrian Oliver’s and Richard Leighton Hill’s conduct during proceedings before the Courts and Warning to Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill regards perverting the Course of Justice  

  • We are all aware responsibility comes with control and that Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill have high level of control over the Defendant, because any Police Officer no matter how senior cannot go against what the Police ‘senior’ lawyers says.
  • If Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill adequately communicate to the Defendant the truth of the horrific wrong that Dr XX has done and also communicate to the Defendant that the false information (see letter form Belinda Kirk 25 July 2019 regards the Defendant totally falsified that the Claimant is a risk to his family)  
  • It follows that the wrongdoing and potentially criminal acts of bring prosecutions based on what they know is not true has occurred quite directly as a result of Adrian Oliver’s and Richard Leighton Hill’s actions and inactions for which they can be personally liable before the criminal and civil courts.
  • The Claimant request Directions form the Court for a date when Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill update on and if that response regards correcting false information (See attached letter 17 July 2019 from Belinda Kirk) and admitting the wrong Dr XX does, is not satisfactory to give directions such as:-.
  1. As to how the false information and highly improper and potentially criminal actions and inactions of Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill be a part of civil proceedings
  • And/or the false information and highly improper and potentially criminal actions and inactions of Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill be part of a new claim in England
  • And/or that to maintain confidence in the profession and the Courts that the Court give Directions for a hearing to sanction and potentially strike off the roll Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill and they can apply to the SRA if the wish to be reinstated. 

Why the Defendant brought a malicious prosecution of the Lewis Gun case when they knew what they were saying was not true was to obstruct and prevent the Claimant in bring civil proceedings.  

  • The context of the Lewis Gun case was according to the MAPPA minutes to prevent the publicity that may occur with the Claimant taking civil proceedings where any normal person can be expected to veer towards thinking that so very many prosecutions there must be wrongdoing by police and those in authority who collude with those police. Please documents see as attached.

Request Order for Disclosure and an Order to read the Defendant’s lawyers documents.

  • Please would the Court Order a date, time and duration and a neutral location such as a conference room in Bristol or Taunton (at a Court or a business room such as a hotel conference room or lawyers firm) where the Defendant’s lawyers must allow the Claimant to read documents.
  • The Defendants lawyers are asked to be able to tell the Court how they will arrange the Document being made available at a neutral venue within easy travelling distance to the Claimant’s home in Taunton.
  • Please could the Court Order disclosure for the Claimant for the Lewis Gun case and also request the Chief Constable to decide the Defendant to stop their deceit 
  • As we are all aware In the UK there has been a major scandal at how police have improperly withheld disclosure at Criminal trials and this scandal is wider spread in the national media and is clearly acknowledged by the Police College who have new procedures to try to ensure police start to disclose adequately.
  • Please can the Court Order the Disclosure that the Claimant should have had in the 2009/2010 Lewis Gun case.
  • Please could the Court Order the Disclosure that the Claimant should have had in the four criminal trials from 2011 to present that have arisen out the dispute of a collusion regards false police MAPPA NHS medical report(s). Where the medical writer colluded with the Defendant via MAPPA in the Lewis gun case and when the Claimant makes protests at their deceit they both (Defendant and medical writer) prosecute the Claimant using information they know is not true. And they also do this to obstruct the Claimant taking civil proceedings regards their deceit and malice in the Lewis Gun case. 

The Claimant’s 2019 lay version of Further Particulars that worries the Defendants as too close to the truth. But did the Defendant obstruct the Claimant complying with civil proceedings by imprisoning the Claimant by a prosecution using information the Defendant knew was untrue? 

  • The Claimant complied with the Court Order to supply Further Particulars by a stipulated date and did so using a lawyer.
  • However, in February 2019 the Claimant could not approve what the lawyer sent to the Court as the Defendant’s arrested the Claimant that weekend in the middle of the period of Claimant meeting with his lawyer.  The lawyer could not meet the claimant in custody during an arrest period and did not know where the Claimant was but rather did a best effort at what the Claimant wished so as not to miss the deadline.
  • Furthermore, it is very obvious that regards at least proportionality or the excessive length of the prison sentence (that meant the Claimant could not meet with his lawyer) is due to the Defendant lawyers and the Defendant being deceitful before the Courts, as to the medical report being blatantly untrue. Or if the medical reports are true to first examine that a prosecution would not be appropriate but rather NHS assessment and care would be appropriate.
  • The fact the Defendant did not start with a reassessment of the medical states of the Claimant shows they brought a prosecution not believing the medical reports that the Claimant protests (or allegedly harasses) about, were true.  
  • Possibly the Court may wish to ignore and put to one side the Defendant’s lawyers panic at a lay version of the truth, until the Chief Constable responds to potential pre action communications regards “a management Decision” of the Chief Constable that there will be no further deceit by the Defendants on specific issues that will be raised?      
  • However especially as the lay Claimant has not failed to comply with an Order to submit Further Particulars, as he did submit a lawyers document on time, but it can appear fair, reasonable and common sense that a lay Claimant if doing a complex case himself for the Claimant to be allowed use his way of explaining the case by his “additional” lay document.

An example where the Order 31 May 2019 is not acknowledging obvious material issues – Please compare the Doctor’s writing with the Caswell Team’s medical evidence quoted below from 2009.  

  • For example we also have to consider that either the Defendant’s August to October 2009 medical report(s) of the Lewis Gun case mean that the Claimant has significant irreversible brain damage (where the rate of deterioration was said to be not known and needs to be monitored/reassessment). And is also delusional in a number of ways. And so should not be expect to cope with complying with Court Directions and Orders. Or if not given the unusual facts (for example that two Radiologists give a normal all clear result 28 August 2009) it follows for all parties should admit the Defendant’s medical report(s) as intentionally false, biased and malicious and so leading to how the Defendant has unlawfully imprisoned the lay Claimant for five years from 2011 to 2019 by the Defendant and their lawyers being deceitful at Courts and it has been the Defendant who has prevented the Claimant from addressing civil proceedings.
  • Please note some detail on the prosecution of cases since 2009 where the Claimant is accused of harassing the writer of the medical reports. If to keep things simple we imagine hypothetically that responses of the Claimant were excessive and so the conviction is not in doubt, we are then left with the prosecution papers are deceitful and dishonest because of if the writer of the medical reports was accurate and the prosecution was honest, then a man with significant irreversible brain damage and with PDD (Paranoid Delusional Disorder) would not have served 5 years in prison. In the well-known farmer Tony Martin who had PDD, when he was convicted of murder (shot at two youths escaping his property) he had a sentence of only 3 years due to PDD (Paranoid Delusional Disorder). 
  • If on the other hand, if the Defendants prosecution cases were to be honest and admitted the bias, deceit, malice and dishonesty of the writer of the medical reports, then either a prosecution would not have proceeded. Or the Claimant would not have served five years in prison because the Claimant would have been recognised as saying the truth that the public and profession need to know. Or the writer of the medical reports could be prosecuted for his exceptional dishonesty before the Courts and to police – on five occasions in five criminal cases between 2009 and 2019.         
  • It must be emphasised that the evidence that Dr XX (and so the Defendant and their lawyers) acted and still acts potentially criminally is very much more. What is said in this document is only a sample in order to be as brief as possible.

The Lewis Gun case 2009 Caswell Clinic Team assessment of the Claimant 

  • An additional dimension is that as part of the Lewis Gun case there was a team assessment by Caswell Clinic the result of which differed to what the doctor who colluded with the Defendant and the 2009 team report page 42 says that the Claimant is not delusion but

“…suffering from a significant degree of anxiety..”

and that

“…continued physical and psychological stress could

have an adverse effect on him in the future…”

  • Suffering from high levels of anxiety often means a person is not normally well enough to conduct complex legal proceedings at the usual pace and speed and would need to be given extra time and leniency.
  • We need to add the extra dimension and extra level of harm was caused by the Defendant’s quite sinister use of a collusion with multi agencies that the Defendant organised from 2009 to the present ‘and indefinitely’, is causing the obstruction that has prevented the Claimant from dealing with all of his civil claims.
  • As explained below the Defendant has been extending their bullying of the Claimant by a deceitful use of multi agency working that would damage anyone’s mental state, so that the Claimant cannot participate in his civil legal proceedings against the Defendant.
  • But then when the Claimant mental state is not the best, to exaggerate that as if the Claimant is a high or highest risk to the community.   
  • The Claimant seeks new Directions that recognise how the Defendant’s trend of deceit and malice within the Lewis Gun case has been continued each year. And the Claimant asks the Court that the truth and facts in the trend of what the Defendant actually does is allowed to become evidence before the Court.

Request Chief Constable personally confirm that specific deceit and dishonesty regards the writer of the Lewis Gun medical reports will not reoccur in prosecutions, any Court papers or in police information systems. 

  • It is therefore becoming obvious that the direction of the claims against the Defendant needs to be varied to address the main problem. Whether by changes to the present claim or by a new claim which can potentially be added to the present claim. With an emphasis on identifying the deceit and dishonesty and to prevent similar deceit in prosecutions and police information systems in future.
  • As we are aware the Chief Constable as the Chief of all police officers staff and lawyers and is liable for what they do. The writer of the Lewis Gun medical reports requested the loss of liberty of the Claimant and the Defendant has continued to use these obviously false reports as if true and accurate. To know how to make requests of the Court or to particularise papers the Claimant requests the Chief Constable personally makes the decision that South Wales Police and it’s information systems, multi-agency communications and it’s lawyers will permanently acknowledge that the writer of the medical reports of 2009 “did some wrong” so contrary to what arrests and prosecutions since 2010 to present, that the Claimant acts with genuine grievance and to specify as explained below

Example of a just some of the criminal case against Dr TW and police who colluded with him that the Chief Constable and Defendant need to act on.

  • The Claimant was Sectioned in August 2009 by the NHS doctor who colluded with the Defendant via MAPPA and potential could be true that the Lewis Gun case would have lost momentum if it were not for this NHS doctor

Does the Claimant have Significant Irreversible Brain Damage? Or is the Defendant dishonest to even a criminal level of deceit?

  • Please see as attached that by 28 August 2009 two Radiologist Dr Aisling Butler and then a second opinion check by Dr Gareth Tudor who are the experts employed by Dr TW’s NHS for being qualified and experienced to interpret Brain Scans said that the result was normal, which the Claimant understands as a message to all other doctors of an all clear.
  • Please see an update 30 September 2009 that Dr XX writes for the Crown Court to request loss of liberty by Section for another month where Dr XX says to apply for a Mental Health Act Section that

“Assessment

The Assessment of Maurice Kirk has concentrated on several areas, mainly the presence or absence of any mental illness and the presence or absence of any traumatic brain injury”       

  • But if we examine Dr XX report of 29 September 2009 which is used as evidence at the Crown Court, Dr XX has totally left out and hidden from the Crown Court that the two Radiologist 28 August 2009 have given a normal all clear result and Dr XX deceitfully states:-

“Maurice Kirk has been referred for detailed brain scans”.

29 September 2009 in point 7

“….suffers with dysfunction of the ventral prefrontal cortex

of the brain….further neuropsychological testing is required

to confirm the severity of such damage.”

29 September 2009 in point 8

“Maurice Kirk has evidence of significant brain damage …..”

29 September 2009 in point 10

  • When in truth the fact is Maurice kirk has already been given a normal all clear result but the deceit goes on to the final report by Dr XX of 19 October 2009 please see the extract attached.
  • Dr XX was the Clinical director responsible for training and controlling that doctors at Caswell Clinic did not go beyond their expertise.
  • But when the brain scan result is normal all clear by 28 August 2009 Dr XX knew he was being dishonest when he wrote formally to the Cardiff Crown Court as a part of proceedings to say there was brain damage while there was no evidence to say that, and if Dr XX was wishing to say there was brain damage Dr TXX knew he would have to use a doctor who medically qualified by trained and experienced in the interpretation of brain scans to provide written evidence.

Claims of Delusions and PDD Paranoid Delusional Disorder are obviously intentionally deceitful assertions that are not based on evidence.

  • Firstly it is not for a doctor when either writing for NHS records or giving evidence to a Court to determine facts and the decisions Courts should make. 
  • If a person is often prosecuted or subject to disproportionate attention by police, that is seemingly unfair Parliament has decided that people should sue the Chief Constable as a means to explore issues and gain accountability. But for Dr XX to say the Claimant is delusional he is persecuted by police Dr XX would have to determine the facts of the Claimant case as being totally without merit and the Defendant has not managed to do that.
  • Dr XX in 2009 implies the Claimant is mentally ill for being concerned as to whether the NHS would covertly put psychiatric medication in his food as if Dr XX says the NHS could never do that so the Claimant must be mentally ill. When DR TW would have known as Clinical Director that the Nursing and Midwifery Council in 2005 and Royal College of Psychiatry in 2008 gave guidelines on when to covertly put psychiatric medication in patients’ food.  
  •  Dr XX tries to discredit the Claimant by saying the Claimant is paranoid or delusional regards occasionally using the word Freemasonry. But the Claimant does not focus on Freemasonry and the oblique references the Claimant may make to Freemasonry would be no different to the National Assembly of Wales and for example one of its past leaders Rhodri Morgan who sought a ban on appointing Freemasons in some key positions. So that as the Claimant does not focus on Freemasonry any more than others the Dr XX would know there is no evidence of delusional behaviour.
  • Essentially every key assertion by Dr XX that the Claimant was delusional can be shown as that Dr XX knew he was being deceitful.
  • There is even a letter by Dr Rose Marnell 3 March 2014 (copy attached) saying there is no evidence of the conditions that Dr XX asserts the Claimant has. And indeed, many other doctors also, confirms a picture that is consistent with Dr XX being malicious and deliberately dishonest and totally deceitful.  

.        

New Witnesses

  • For example, not all in the multi-agency staff colluded but rather could not prevent what the Defendant did. Those multi agency staff from 2009 to present need to become witnesses. As well as multi agency staff who are hostile to the Claimant.  
  • Also the Claimant out of prison is taking statements from numerous people.
  • The Claimant has found a letter 1 June 2010 where the Defendant refuses to investigate wrongdoing by police in the Lewis gun case based on witness statements not disclosed to the Claimant.

Defendant’s influence means endless failed Disclosure. The Claimant now requests, yet again, Court Orders for Disclosure.

  • Caswell Clinic
  • HMP Parc
  • Parole’s Oasysis Assessment
  • Police eligible data where there have been applications since 2009 with MAPPA, MG6D and PII protected evidence having been applied for many times under Subject Access Requests.

Request for an Order regards withheld evidence regards Mr & Mrs Cooper who purchased the Lewis Gun were interviewed under caution but were not prosecuted

  • The Claimant requests an Order for Disclosure regards the evidence the Defendant withheld during the Lewis Gun case in 2009/10 regards Mr & Mrs Cooper who purchased the Lewis Gun from the Claimant
  • South Wales Police were in close contact liaising with Police in Nottingham. That caused Mr & Mrs Cooper who purchased the Lewis Gun from the Claimant to be interviewed under caution and there are tapes and records or why Mr & Ms Cooper were not prosecuted – when the claimant was which South Wales Police had access to and knowledge of but all of which was deliberately hidden from the prosecution process, the Claimant and the trial at Cardiff Crown Court.   
  • The Claimant seeks Order(s) for Disclosure from ‘all’ parties.

Request Disclosure of withheld statements from 2009

  • On 1 June 2012 Detective Inspector Holden of South Wales Police refused to progress the complaint into the Lewis Gun case when obviously there are issues that honest police would need to look at in order to maintain professional standards. But D.I. Holder inadvertently says of statements and evidence obtained by the Defendant in 2009 that were not disclosed to the Claimant in 2009.    
  • For example as a part of the deceit the defendant uses statements from people who are not expert in the relevant issues of firearms law relevant to why the Lewis gun was legal.
  • SWP deliberately and deceitful used quasi-experts to mislead where quasi experts are people or staff who are not experts but rather work a speciality and can useful expertise on what they do, But the quasi expert is not experienced enough to be an expert who can comment with expertise on the wider full picture such as being an expert on contradictions and complications of fire arms law such as is found in the 2015 Law Commission report and the 2009 Consultation.
  • As the Home Office Consults Police forces in a consultation ending May 2009 Police knew the legal issues regards the Lewis Gun within the law earlier in 2009. 
  • Disclosure can help show how the Defendant deceitfully and maliciously manipulated the evidence by not asking for comment to explain how the Lewis gun was legal because of it was supplied by the MOD/RAF
  • Disclosure can also show that the Defendant avoids issues like the debate and consultations say how any Police have a duty to assess if a gun supplied by the MOD/RAF (which can easily be modified to fire) used by genuine enthusiasts or not. But SWP police knew that the Claimant had sold a Lewis Gun he received from the MOD/RAF to enthusiasts and a museum and so no reason whatsoever to believe the gun was re-commissioned to use as a weapon.   

New Evidence – Legal Advice needed on new evidence is emerging and the transcripts of the 2009 trial became available to people in 2019 who are starting to respond with information.

  • If the Defendant had been honest in prosecution documents and if the Defendant had not colluded with the writer of the 2009 medical reports in 2009 would not have been in prison
  • Now the Claimant is out of prison and not restricted in travel by licence conditions the Lewis Gun case transcripts from 2010 have become available to people the Claimant is learning more.
  • The Claimant needs time to put all this new evidence together and request the Directions of the Court so that the truth can be evidence at trial. 

Directions on additional Further and Better Particulars to include how the Defendant manipulated and used multi agencies to harm the Claimant  

  • In proving a case at Court and addressing accountability, establishing a trend is important to show it is not just a one-off problem.
  • For truth to be come evidence and to avoid issuing new proceedings with a messy duplicate civil trial the Claimant needs Legal advice on how to add the actions how the Defendant has manipulated multi agencies in 2009 onwards to the present moment and 2020, which of means also including the writer of the medical reports, and the Defendant’s lawyers conduct
  • It must be emphasised that the evidence that Dr XX (and so the Defendant and their lawyers) acted and still acts potentially criminally is very much more. What is said in this document is only a sample in order to be as brief as possible.
  • As can be seen by all this events and the have been too much for a lay Claimant to cope with such complex civil proceedings and he request the Court set new Directions so that he can manage and include all the new issues and evidence.

STATEMENT OF TRUTH

I believe that the facts stated in this application are true.

Maurice John Kirk BVSc

Date 21 January 2020

CASE NO:1CF03361

& D00CF279

IN THE CARDIFF COUNTY COURT

MAURICE JOHN KIRK

Claimant

and

CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES CONSTABULARY

Defendant

List of Documents in Support of the N244 Application 21 January 2020

  DATE     Name   Relevance
28 Aug 2009 NHS Radiology Brain Scan results. Two doctors at ABMU NHS confirm a normal all clear result.
30 Sept 2009 Dr XX reports to the Cardiff Crown Court Dr XX hides the above from the Court and totally makes up that this is brain damage.
19 Oct 2009 Extract of Dr XX final Opinion to Cardiff Crown Court  
16 June 2010 CAA Medical says Claimant is fit to fly Obviously Claimant Maurice Kirk does not appear mentally ill or brain damaged as Dr XX says.
28 Nov 2013 University Hospital of Wales (UHW) Cardiff Radiology at UHW gives a normal all clear brain scan 
14 March 2014 Dr Rose Marnell Clinical Director at HMP Cardiff Says no evidence of any brain damage or PDD/delusion.
25 July 2019 Belinda Kirk (Oxford educated TV/film maker daughter of Claimant) Writes regards the Defendant falsely saying the Claimant is a risk to her and her family when Belinda Kirk says that is not true. .
     
     
     
Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments

‘Heroin’ for Alun Cairns MP & John Graham from my Prison Cell

Sample of stopped letters from John Graham with stamps, from my family and from Sabine MacNeill with no party notified

The South Wales Police again conspire to pervert the course of Justice yet again by having me gaoled for almost all year only to withdraw the two charges under the Terrorism Act, would you believe!

Anything to prejudice my ever increasing number of civil claims for malicious criminal prosecutions due to their deceit and cowardly incessant bullying of me when not, again, prepared to face up to cross examination before an English law court, at long last.

DataProtection@south-wales.pnn.police.uk 15:03 (14 minutes ago)  
to me
THE USUAL SOUTH WALES POLICE PREVARICATION

Good Afternoon

Please accept our apologies for the delay in the disclosure of your Subject Access Request

We are doing everything we can to minimise delays to providing a response however we are currently experiencing unprecedented challenges amid the COVID-19 pandemic which will affect our ability to meet our usual standards of compliance.  Whilst we will aim to provide responses as soon as possible, we are unable to provide you with an exact date as to when you will receive your disclosure.

Please be assured that we are aware of your request.

You have the right to lodge a complaint with the Information Commissioners Office regarding the delay however we would encourage you to read their information pages before doing so. https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/news-and-events/news-and-blogs/2020/03/data-protection-and-coronavirus/

Thank you for your patience.

cid:image001.jpg@01D46472.E18FE420     Kind Regards Sally Hillman
Arweinydd Tim | Team Leader
Rheolwr Rheoli Data a Datgeliadau | Data Management and Disclosure Unit
Pencadlys Heddlu De Cymru | South Wales Police Headquarters
(: 01656 303444 | Ext: 26662 |
  cid:image002.jpg@01D46472.E18FE420 cid:image003.jpg@01D46472.E18FE420 cid:image004.jpg@01D46472.E18FE420 cid:image005.jpg@01D46472.E18FE420
Maurice Kirk <maurice@kirkflyingvet.com> 15:16 (5 minutes ago)  
 

MY WELSH PRISON STOPPED LETTERS

Further to my today’s URGENT BAIL VARIATION APPLICATION, based on new evidence yesterday from  Mr JOHN GRAHAM (alleged recipient of ‘noxious white powder’ from my Cardiff prison cell) I now have damming corroborated facts that South Wales Police, whilst I was in Exeter prison deliberately perverted the course of justice re again stopping my prison letters to MPs, solicitor, family and Taunton GP

Maurice J Kirk BVSc  
Tel 07708586202          www.kirkflyingvet.com mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

It will take me a week to get through these illegally withheld prisoner’s mail by South Wales Police and G4S!

Dear Sis,

Owing to my visiting John yesterday, prior to his operation, caused me to now examine the huge pile of stopped G4S Parc and Cardiff prison letters that has been sitting on top of my kitchen cupboard since last year.

This pile almost untouched until now, kept for an ever-hopeful external police force investigation, had been set aside as I was violently ejected from prison on 1st Nov 19 in an act of robbery. These letters, meantime, were being handed back to my driver to take me directly to the nearest English casualty hospital unit across the Severn Bridge.

NB The bundle of my Cardiff Prison ‘stopped letters’ held in the F wing office, for all to see, was not amongst them . The large brown package, amongst that bundle was my two year vindictive prison term appeal from nasty judge Tracy Lloyd Jones who had the stupidity to even lie to my face when saying she could do nothing about (did not have the power’) to cause investigation into the blackmailed forensic psychiatrist’s Caswell clinic fabricated psychiatric reports that has resulted in ruining my family, veterinary and aviation way of life (see transcript) for 5 years of false imprisonment.

Your prison stopped April 19 letter to South Wales Health Board to me, for example, which is a blatant criminal conduct. My welsh police ‘interview’ will be quickly shredded this week, Avon and Somerset police must be persuaded to obtain my November 2019 101 call transcript as a classic example of the welsh police having again been refusing to divulge its content of such significant evidence undermining the prosecution’s cases including in machine-gun fiasco, to again fool the English authorities.

John informed me, after successful surgery, he never had a police interview for an MG 11 witness statement and yet I was charged and gaoled in May 2020 for sending him ‘white powder’ in a letter from my May 19 Cardiff prison cell only to be released in November. [Inadvertent tooth paste glue on back of a court transcript was the mistake].

 Prison staff told me, at around that time, after a 32 minute ‘cell search’ with two sniffer dogs(while I was was locked in the shower unit in my wheel chair) it was possibly ‘heroin’ as the same powder appeared same as one sent on same day to Alun Cairns MP

Could Enid Blyton have written better?

Alun has a plethora of documentation, of course, for criminal investigations on his own South Wales Police’s yet another failed conspiracy to secure my minimum 10 year prison term. I have had Alun on listening ‘watch’ about the appalling state of welsh courts, police and prisons for years. IT resulted in my being introduced in Swansea Prison, to Nick Hardwick the then HM Prisons Minister while in my wheel chair.

(TO STOP my 1CF03361 & BS614159  one million pound damages claims resulting from first and second attempts for infinite/indefinite incarcerations)

I have been denied copy of any of my 40/50 odd letters sent out to MPs and Avon and Somerset Police during my 2019 unlawful prison time nor have I yet found any of them in this pile of stopped letters, mainly coming into prison, violently returned to me on 1st Nov 2019.

John Graham’s letter bearing all too precious 1st class stamps I was denied , so often, in wicked welsh prisons

sample of my sister’s, Sabine MacNeill’s and John Graham May 2019 stopped prison letters by South Wales Police with none of us being notified
M
Copy of John Graham emails from South Wales Police

Subject: Statement

Good afternoon Mr Graham,

With regards to your previous email confirming your relationship with Mr Maurice Kirk and the fact that you had not received any mail containing a white powder, would you be prepared to provide a statement containing those details and your knowledge of a white powder discovered within letters that you believe to be toothpaste.

Regards

Dear Ms. Richards,

In answer to your enquiry I can confirm I know Maurice Kirk as an acquaintance more than a friend.

I must add I have never received any letter from him with anything resembling a “white powder” attached to it. I understand that this “white powder” in question, after formal forensic investigation, proved to be common toothpaste.

I hope this helps.

Thank you,

J. Graham 

BUT THE POLICE HAVE STILL NOT DISCLOSED previously ordered, under CPR, PII, MG6D and OASYS fabricated data , the latter used, incidentally, to have me persecuted for years in welsh prison as a (fictitious) wrongly convicted victim for ‘child abuse’, ‘firearms’ and ‘narcotics’, ,,,disgusting short arsed vermin. 

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

South Wales Police face Criminal Proceedings in England

MY LATEST BLOG ALWAYS ON TOP OF LIST OF BLOGS ON THE RIGHT

Welsh police confiscate my Caswell Clinic medical Records due to Dolmans’ Fraud

Appellant’s 22nd April 2020 Position Statement

1. Notwithstanding the fact that this Appellant’s contentious court cases primarily originate from South Wales with its unique jurisdiction it is never too late for a little truth, honesty and sense of fair play to prevail.
2. Notwithstanding the fact of a serious injustice concerning the division of the family’s assets, taking full advantage of his emotional mental state at the time and absence of proper legal representation, the current removing of the Respondent’s name from French property deeds was always the prime responsibility of the Respondent from the moment the UK property deeds were settled.
3. Notwithstanding the fact that the Appellant had abided by 26th March 2013 court order, within the 48 days, the other party has not possibly due to there having been no financial incentive. This has left a substantial loss for the Appellant due to his inability to sell off the French properties.
4. Notwithstanding the fact the Welsh authorities had fabricated Appellant with false criminal convictions, including child abuse, firearms and narcotics, on 1st November 2019 had the Appellant violently evicted from the largest welsh prison with his arms viciously manicalled behind his back.
5. And for what purpose? It was for interested parties, in current Cardiff litigation, to obtain an unfair advantage by the seizure of all his legal papers and not even his clothes returned to the rightful owner.
5. The South Wales Police not only unlawfully controls HMP Parc by using both extreme and unusual bullying it has ensured nothing is done about its breach of Article 2 etc and theft of Appellant’s property.
6. Despite written complaints to both Avon and Somerset or Devon and Cornwall constabularies, to even recover his legal papers for this case, he is ignored.
7. Behind this travesty of justice is their notorious 10 year ongoing 1CF03361 police machine-gun conspiracy case (T20097445). This originated from the then Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, to save her pension, having ordered the unblocking of the barrel of an alleged WW1 Lewis machine gun previously in alleged Appellant’s possession.
8. Not only did the welsh police ignore the advice from other police forces in England but also RAF and Farnborough Air Show previous scrutineers all confirming it was NOT a firearm and so, in desperation, even painted the film prop from film ‘Gunbus’ a different colour in the hope of fooling the jury!

Thee Breton Houses FOR SALE £80,000


Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Tel 07708586202

http://www.kirkflyingvet.com
mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com
maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Posted in Uncategorized | 33 Comments

South Wales Police Corruption

Dear Rebecca Pow,                                                                                   17th February 2020

South Wales Police fabricated criminal allegations including ‘Child Abuse, Firearms (Trading in Machine Guns) Narcotics, ABH and FTA (failing to attend courts) etc

I am grateful for your seeing me concerning the police denying my Taunton GP my medical records.

My recent blog extract, below, on the decades of suffering under ‘South Wales Police Corruption’, affecting so many, points to proof of rampant criminal conduct when accountable to no one:

Re-elected Taunton MP, Rebecca Pow, inadvertently caused my imprisonment in March 2019 for seven more months and only released due to the fortunate intervention by a clearly irate HM Parole Board member from London that had been lied to for two hours with my sister witnessing it all.

The Chief Constable of South Wales Police had not only allowed the fabrication of seriously damaging criminal convictions, to cause me hell in his police controlled Parc, Bridgend prison but had also ensured the list included ‘child abuse’, ‘firearms’, ‘ABH’, FTA and ‘narcotics’! Police convinced my parole officer that I had sent to Stoke St Mary village, Taunton, possibly deadly anthrax spores in a prison cell letter causing it to have the village cordoned off from the public!

Would this ongoing conspiracy have anything to do with the then Barbara Wilding’s emergency 2009 MAPPA level 3 Category 3  ‘Operation Chalice’  meeting in Barry police station on the 8th of June in order to register me amongst the top 5% most dangerous in the UK in order I may be shot?

When an armed police helicopter, with 20 odd officers, had raided our house in St Donats, while we were enjoying afternoon tea in the garden with the springer spaniels, why was I then NOT arrested?

Was this to do with my being set up to be ‘shot’ (see leaked MAPPA category 3 memos) or their failed attempt (Operation Dandelion) in snatching our 10 year old daughter, Genevieve, to forced council care? It was to try and stop my civil claims, BS614159 etc, following the police’s 50 failed malicious prosecutions often denying me liberty during those decades of deliberate persecution.

South Wales Police Corruption ‘Ups a Notch’

I am arrested at my Cardiff veterinary surgery for theft of my own motor bike and gaoled in Cardiff prison for 4 days.

Poloice concoct charges of being in possession og a ‘garrotte type instrument in the pannier (embriotomy wire used on cattle dehorning on HRH Prince Charles farm and from ‘assaulting PC Philips who had thought I was possibly an escaped psychiatric patient.

This wicked police interview was deliberately withheld from all my civl proceeding for compensation with the final presiding judge refusing disclosure of any of the substantivre trial court records as they covered over 50 failed malicious criminal prosecutions. This tape was leaked revealing the level of SWP routinde corruption for which they are k nown world wide.

Police interview  20th May1993

Would it have had anything to do with the police then transporting my decommissioned WW1 Battle of the Somme Lewis machine gun 2000 miles around the UK, contrary to s5 of the 1968 Firearms Act, had they not, first, unblocked the gun barrel and having her painted a different colour to fool the jury to secure a mandatory 10 year prison term for ‘trading in machine guns’?

Who out there on cyber space would like a copy of the official machine gun trial transcript for a view on the trial judge , PAUL THOMAS QC, to see how internal ‘taffy politics’ command my destiny?

[South Wales Police ref 1900195556 ‘alleged Heroin sent to Alun Cairns MP’] [I900180883 ‘alleged anthrax spores to Rebecca Pow MP]. To whom do I complain?

Posted in Uncategorized | 18 Comments

Police Conspiracy to kill me foiled but will Burnett LCJ Rescue me again?

Burnett LCJ 2ndBurnett LCJ

Lord Chief Justice’s Annual Press Conference 2017

https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/announcements/lord-chief-justices-annual-press-conference-2017/

Machine gun aspx sm

Police repaint gun to try and fool 2010 machine-gun jury but not before frantically driving the antique almost 2000 miles around the UK, often with only one or two unarmed police in the vehicle , contrary to regulations because the Chief Constable had bloody well known from the start, the gun was recorded in aircraft CAA log books as decommissioned and proved , before trial by the new owner.

2000 miles to fudge the issue of a REPLICA machine gun

2000 miles to fudge the issue of a REPLICA machine gun

Last time, in February 2016, His Lordship had asked me to leave the public gallery and address both he and his colleague, Mr Justice Sweeney,  over my application following Mrs Kirk having been banned from ‘note taking’ on my behalf  by the South Wales judge, HHJ Crowther.

Welsh courts invariably hold me behind bullet proof glass to protect me BUT primarily to make sure I hear as little as possible in the hope their blackmail may lead to my confiding in my defence information  to one of their lawyers

Their Lordships bluntly quashed this one of manywicked practices carried out in the Welsh courts with gay abandon.

Will Their Lordships come to my rescue again , we all wonder, over the police’s attempt to having me shot on Barbara Wilding’s door step as one of the top most dangerous individuals in the UK?

Extract of email to my 112th law firm asked to protect me from incessant  South Wales Police bullying

Can you please confirm you are still acting for me in the case AND ATTENDING WITH QC I briefed in London with a witness?

I now have new information for the judge, HHJ Tracy Lloyd-Clarke for the lawyer, from a fortunate civil hearing only yesterday, 1CF03361 (machine-gun/murder conspiracy), that should lead to the release, at last, of police MAPPA and MACHINE  GUN CONSPIRACY RECORDS TO GET  MY POLICE PSYCHIATRIC REPORTS FABRICATED.

HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC also helped stop my civil claims, following their 33 failed malicious prosecutions aimed at me. Now,this week ,this machine gun judge refused to order specific disclose just as in the first 33 failed prosecutions or the wrong people would go to prison.

The police QC was made to admit to HH judge Keiser that HH judge Seys LLEWELLYN  QC refused to release those MAPPA minutes even when they had been delivered to court in  the proverbial ‘brown envelope’ in front of me containing their plan to having me killed.
 
South Wales Police were now ordered to disclose HH Judge Thomlow’s documentary evidence as well that he had used at secret HH judge Bidder QC hearing in Cardiff Crown Court to have me sectioned to Ashworth for rest of my life.
 
Their yet to be disclosed forensic history  of me contained their Caswell clinic I had diagnosed, with PROF RODGER WOOD OF Swansea university lying,  that I had a brain tumour making me so dangerous….MAPPA LEVEL 3 CATEGORY 3 (top 5% most dangerous) … I must not be told…….and never have been since.
 
Police, this very week, were made to allow my box of records, created from my near eight months in Cardiff prison during the scandalous 2010 trading in machine-guns trial fiasco, suddenly to appear after  about 5 years of apparently missing
 
Remember , HH Judge Seys Llewellyn QC had quickly ordered the destruction of my BS 614159 etc  court records, to block a RCJ appeal, relating to my first of many substantive claims for over two  million pounds,  after he had refused need for both standard and specific disclosure arising from over 40 police incidents.
 
I had dutifully released 50 odd arch lever files for BS case and they produced not one of relevance and I am now expected me to release my  intricate 2009 collated prison records of their daily criminal conduct.
 
Now, am I morally obliged to accommodate all these delightful people with disclosure they already have and appear to have gravitated to Cardiff’s so called law courts, civil and criminal?
 

The lying little bastards, in 2014, again told the court there were no bail hostels available, a habit of theirs to keep me in prison, just as they did this time , for next week’s court, ‘cannot find a welsh forensic psychiatrist to assess your fitness’.…. as South Wales medics are all too bloody  scared to counter any other South Wales doctor as it is NHS (Wales) controlled and NOT NHS (England).

My sister, Celia  and another, quietly made their own enquiries as to bail hostel availability, that January in 2014 both to be told there were plenty.

AND SO TO FRANCE,

. “I am just going outside and may be some time.”

Let us, before boarding, start considering HHJ Tracy Lloyd -Clarke’s Cardiff Crown Court’s hearing this week on Thursday or Friday, I forget which for the moment.

How police can withhold the truth, for eight years, surrounding my machine-gun incarceration now set up in both my T20170239 criminal & 1CF03361 civil cases to maximise world publicity of accepted routine deceit and corruption in the welsh law courts, alas, still part of the United Kingdom 

my stolen property out of spite

extract from 2009 court transcript:

my mistake.jpg

“My mistake” lying Thomlow mutters.

Lying welsh judge, Richard Thomlow, in my forced absence in cells below, informed the July 2009 court that both the seller and purchaser of my Lewis machine-gun were known to the police more than 6 months before my trial but kept me locked up to cause maximum disruption in my civil proceedings against them for their losing the first 33 malicious prosecutions, at that time, aimed against me.

As nine of the jury commented after acquittal , “Why were they not both also in the dock with Mr Kirk?”

Answer, because the court was presided over yet another corrupt welsh judge , Paul Thomas.

11 06 11 Paul Thomas QC

09 06 23 Foxy mg11.jpg

more extracts later

Posted in Uncategorized | 50 Comments

South Wales Police Squander Huge Amounts of Cash just to Preserve Their Chief Constable’s Pension

DRAFT

Police Stratagem to Arrest Maurice John Kirk or Get Him Shot

This is a very telling only just disclosed anonymous document from Dolmans’, the chief constable’s private lawyers defending so many of my substantial damages claims brought by me due to 40 odd failed police and Dolmans assisted malicious criminal prosecutions.

Aer signing the visitor’s book I am rapidly surrounded by armed police sporting tin hast and stun grenades

This Strategy memo was deliberately withheld from my T20097445 ‘trading in machine guns’ jury trial in 2010 as it again reveals the delay from South Wales Police seeing the replica Lewis machine gun on the WW1 DH2 replica biplane, advertised worldwide so many times, suggests that as ‘exchange’ of BS614159 witness statements’ with Dolmans was due no later than 4pm on the 19th June 09 by court order and I had already phoned earlier in the day and week on when and where will ‘exchange’ take place. It was abundantly clear to me Dolmans had no intention of expediting the court order civil trial had to be buried alongside me.

South Wales Police record that I went to Barry police station on several occasions indicating I needed to serve witness summonses on serving police officers., I left ones for officers, Inspector Trigg, Sergeant Rice and PC Nicholas Khilberg at least, eye witnesses on multiple arrest incidents concluding in my favour.

The 15th June 09 MAPPA level 3 meeting, in Barry police station, just down the road from my veterinary hospital included the police blackmailed doctor and senior social worker from Caswell clinic who’s notes also recorded that I was ‘likely to be shot’ in the planned armed police helicopter raid on our home, in South Wales.

Called under covert name, ‘Operation Challis’ a parallel planned raid was set up, if I was arrested and not shot. That was ‘Operation Dandelion’, which was launched as I was taken away in handcuffs to closed down Port Talbot police station for days of questioning. Police and social workers arrived at the family home to snatch our then 10-year old daughter, Genevieve, to be taken into Vale of Glamorgan Council Care as I was now a registered in the top 5% most dangerous MAPPA level3/3 victim.
.

Despite my arrest had been agreed on or before 1st June, at the police HQ AIG meeting many weeks before, it was further delayed by both 8th and 15th June 2009 MAPPA level 3/3 covert meetings in Barry and Bridgend police stations. Police records now release, 11 years later, that they already had known about the world-wide advertisement of my film replica ‘gun’ and knew exactly where it was in 2008.

Why? The Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, had just instigated her ‘shoot to kill;’ policy into the Metropolitan police force as if a parting gift from their Deputy Chief Constable. Her remedy for ridding herself of my continuing irritation and nuisance to the South Wales Police force, by generating such adverse publicity, was obvious.

It was also obvious both me and my 100 plus arch lever files, accurately recording both her and predecessor’s criminal conduct, including 40 odd failed prosecutions, was to be covered up in the bizarre Cardiff Civil Justice Centre hearings.

My BS614159 +10 substantial damages claims, in those days exceeded one million pounds in my claims for damages and Dolmans’ fiddled costs, alone, exceeded one million. Dolmans refuse to disclose the ‘break down of its bill of costs for fear of the media from proven fraud. I refer especially to the documents Adrian Oliver personally had drafted for both criminal and civil courts, for others to sign as true.

The manner in which Oliver had personally had me nearly shot on Sunday 21st October was from maliciously instructing one of his office staff to visit Cardiff’s central police station on the Saturday morning triggering the chaotic execution of Operation Challis and Operation Dandelion, on our quiet country home, was only partly prepared owing to the un fortunate absence of both Detective Chief Superintendent Stuart McKenzie and 2nd in command, Detective Inspector Suzanne Hughes, were considering on the Friday afternoon. “Why don’t I just ring up Maurice and ask him if he knows where the replica WW1 biplane went after he had sold it after flying his aircraft in the 2000 Farnborough Air Show”?

Yours for £130,000 with Carp lake

But on the Saturday with a signed Dolmans written complaint of my ‘threat to cause criminal damage caused Oliver, also wishing to hide adverse publicity, pressed that I should be immediately.

Under Judge Seys Llewellin, I only just recently found out was the most senior judge in Wales, had me banned from the Cardiff’s criminal and civil courts’ public counters for 10 years, making sure he left no tell-tale audit trail as to the real reasons why?

The same judge also attempted to bury his disastrously managed many weeks of oral evidence, from 99 witnesses, ever to see ‘the light of day’.

For a further16 months he delayed my appeal to the RCJ until sealing his 2013 inaccurate judgment on the day of his retirement and which had given sufficient time for the RCJ to say the laws had changed, meantime, making an appeal from Wales no longer available to the RCJ and only allowed to be heard in Wales!

Now refused at the RCJ’s HM Court of Appeal back to appeal BS614159 in the Cardiff Civil court, as I was now registered MAPPA 3/3 most dangerous with police continuing to deliberately concoct evidence to having me ‘lawfully’ shot to stop my civil claim ‘risk’ to her pension with the now new 1CF03361 two million pound damages claim, wrongfully prosecuted for ‘trading in machine guns’. Police had painted the dummy film prop back to black and had unblocked the piece of water pipe, imitating the gun barrel, in an attempt to fool the jury.

I had only the day before, remember on 18th June when I was well inside the South Wales Police’s Bridgend HQ and even had gained entry to the Chief Constable’s inner sanctum with my ‘exchange’ civil claim witness file tucked under my arm

Judge Seys llewellyn

Why didn’t anyone ask me about the film prop ‘gun’ then? About ten of them, many in ant flak jackets carrying automatic rifles, stun grenades and sporting tin hats surrounded me and not only searched me and my car thoroughly (an assault) only then allowed to leave, after rounding up my three legged terrier they had allowed to be let loose, After a senior female officer, Griffiths, conferred with Wilding ,refusing her to accept the file on Wilding’s behalf I quickly signed the visitors book as proof, at least to the judge, Seys Llewellyn, well , at least I had tried.

The Fabricated Facts to avoid the already doomed machine-gun trial

South Wales Police had painted the ammunition magazine from silver back to black and had unblocked the water pipe imitation ‘barrel’ to try and fool the jury

While we all hunted for our three-legged Jack Russel, Jacques, around the grounds of the police station I casually asked the police men present if their search had discovered any machine guns about or live ammunition for it?

I have always thought the premature arrest of me was a Mr Plod ‘knee jerk’ right hand on the 20th of June not knowing what the left hand was doing as it is revealed the statement of Dolmans’ hand written letter, dated on the Saturday 20th, while Detective Chief Superintendent Stuart McKenzie was in transit to a conference somewhere in England at the time, Adrian Oliver insistence I be arrested with no further delay.

Had he overlooked the ‘Foxy’ witness statement he had drafted just a week or so earlier for the police woman to sign ‘he’ had telephoned my wife who in tune had told me a woman had phoned enquiring about the WW1 Lewis machine gun with ammo for sale? Eight of the jury, after my 9th Feb 2010 acquittal, told me and members of my family it must have been first an undercover police woman now switched to a man giving the behind the screen to hide his identity. Possibly on maternity leave.

Having witnessed Adrian Oliver’s lies and read so many of his drafted witness statements for those to give evidence and had unlawfully failed disclosure incidents all screams bias in these welsh law courts so much so the welsh police were dependent on the power of ‘authority’ the same’ authority’ that adversely prejudiced my family’s Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons to cut off my income needed to fund the now ten or so damages claims against the welsh authorities including the police, HMP prisons and specifically named members of the Caswell clinic psychiatric prison just down the road from the G4S prison and police HQ,

All very cosy with almost all of the 113 criminal allegations thrown at me, while trying to practice veterinary science in the Vale of Glamorgan, came from the same close-knit police cabal but losing 89% of the malicious criminal prosecutions in court, if not withdrawn by the HM Crown Prosecution Service as plain stupid.

Prosecuted for ‘smuggling’ pigs into Ireland from a farmer’s field outside Cowbridge, in a 1950 two seat Piper Colt, seven times my refusing to produce any driving documents at all when ordered to by a uniformed police officer, for ‘speeding’ when it turned out the police representative , in court, had all the time, in his file, a clear photograph of the driver, one of my ‘work man’ that lead to an arrerst, a gang of South Wales Police had caused my Cardiff surgery front door to be smashed in by sledge-hammer to assist squatters to enter my premises, again, with the Chief Superintendent’s pregnant daughter and cause more substantial criminal damage are but a few of the CPS blocked criminal prosecutions once the truth, from my cross examinations, began to leak out.

It was the CPS, remember, as recorded in the June 2009 MAPPA level 3 meeting minutes was opposed, from the start, in having me arrested on once owning what may have been, at the time, a prohibited weapon. The CPS consulted and at the MAPPA meeting explained that it was my intent on serving at least 40 odd witness summons before trial commenced only to be achieved by following the daily ‘school run’ to respective homes as each police station, in turn, Cardiff, Barry and Llantwit Major had all refused ‘acknowledgment of service’ of £40 paid for at a time witness subpoenas. Even blocked at the airport for service on a air traffic controller, where I has intimidated by police with guns surrounding me stating that if I did not leave the Cardiff airport, immediately, I would be arrested.

That daft but dangerous incident arose in the frightening low level, even for me, police helicopter chase terrifying the pilot with me so much we had to put the D-Day cub down in first appropriate farmers very rough and almost too small 200-yard field.

Oliver’s misleading police signed MG11 witness statements, such as Barbara Wilding ‘s 6 weeks late affidavit ,contrary to court order and the countless other Dolmans drafted witness statements (almost 100 of them) some clearly bungled to be false, purported to be those of serving eye witnessing officers on their beat, over the years, had finally triggered my arrest due to a hoax ‘girt brick’ potential through his solicitor’s office window.

This left floundering police in Port Talbot police station that 22nd June 2009 night clearly not knowing how to proceed as they were now about to be faced with not just all the medical reports from Caswell Clinic already ordered, those of my own GP of 18 years, PEH specialists and hordes of CAA medical professionals all contradicting what they wanted, that I had relevant ‘brain damage’ and a ‘mental disorder’ of PDD sufficient for me to be locked away, for life, in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital because the planned assassination on me had gone ‘belly up’ due to Dolmans week-end interference to have caused someone senior to press the ‘panic button’ to launch Operations Challis and Dandelion.

The police were now faced with forensic psychiatrist, Dr Bridget Craddock, having examined me in the station, also stating the police black mailed Caswell Clinic doctor was a liar when misleading the MAPPA covert meetings.

The consequences of their joint actions caused the 5 years loss in my life, loss of my wife, health, wealth and damned near my sanity.

There are £1000 rewards to anyone who can significantly enhance my current predicament with donating new evidence in my civil claims against the Welsh authorities brought by an Englishman hoping for justice in a welsh court room.


Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Tel 07708586202

http://www.kirkflyingvet.com
mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com
maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Posted in Access to Justice | Leave a comment

More machine-gun Conspiracy South Wales Police disclosed

The excuse to having me shot

watch this space

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Can any body send me these alleged Anti Muslim Cartoons as it is obvious a world-wide opinion is sought

ring 07708586202 or maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

thankyou

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

£10,000 REWARD for Caswell Clinic Psychiatric Report

A substantial reward for any one who can get me a copy of Professor Rodger Wood’s original September 2009 medical report of me stating, apart from other ridiculous data, my permanent brain damage, making me so MAPPA3/3 dangerous, was due to my ditching my D-Day Piper cub in the Caribbean and for having been a ‘long term drinking partner of actor, Oliver Reed’.

Upon my acquittal at Cardiff’s HM Crown Court on 9th February 2010 the lying little piece of sh– altered his report denying any idea that he was so qualified to interpret the X-Rays from a SPECT scan (just a psychology lecturer at Swansea University).

This original and now buried report, protected the forensic psychiatrist sufficiently to allow police blackmailed Dr xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx to apply to His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC, on 2nd December 2009, that I should be locked away, for life, in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital.

It may take another 10 years of my life just to get the Dolmans, solicitors, of Cardiff’s wickedly concocted police statements of June 2009, like those also now re-hashed ones of quickly promoted, to do my arrest, only to be rapidly retired South Wales police officers, Detective Superintendent Suzanne Hughes and Detective Chief Superintendent Stuart McKenzie, upon my acquittal now leaving me with their joint June 2020 witness statements, also drafted by Adrian Oliver, my ‘hot and sweeties’ to be circulated world -wide.

LET ME WARN YOU, I was locked up in Caswell Clinic for a terrifying three months under an illegally brought section 35 of the 1983 Psychiatric Act but with sufficient time to interrogate staff and police victims in order to assess what may be next?

R U NEXT?

As then, now and before, boys and girls in Wales are routinely being locked-up for experimentation or because some, like myself, are a threat to their police pensions

Adolph Hitler did it, Joseph Stalin before him did it and many despots since have done it which is why I call it ‘being dealt the Gulag card’. So, go speak to Patrick Cullinane and Norman Scarth (95 years old ex RN Arctic convoy’s sinker of the German battlecruiser Scharnhorst ) who both skipped country to escape the men in white coats and seek refuge, one in the heavens and the latter now in Eire.

Our Gen

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Covert Police Operation Challis to having me shot

Why didn’t the police simply not ring me up or drop round for a quiet chat to ask where my aircraft had gone to?Watch this space
Posted in Child snatchingUncategorized | 2 Comments

The Elephant in the Room

On 24th June 2020 Detective Chief Inspector Stuart Mackenzie of the South Wales Police was dragged out of an early lucrative retirement, the reward for what the local Taffia had told him to do, have me arrested in the hope of my receiving a 10 year prison term.

Mackenzie was to sign yet another one of Adrian Oliver’s concocted witness statements. Oliver of Dolmans , solicitors, Cardiff, had drafted a retrospective account of Operations ‘Chalice’ and ‘Dandelion’ in 2009 to have me ‘lawfully shot’. If that had failed the back-up police cars, also surrounding our home in St Donats, were also waiting, up the lane, with a Vale of Glamorgan social services team to take our then 10 year old daughter, Genevieve, to be taken into ‘care’. Why? Because the clandestine MAPPA level 3 category 3 meeting three weeks earlier in Barry police station had registered me amongst the top 5% most dangerous in the UK!

Oliver had already fabricated an oh so similar witness statement for the then Chief Constable, in February 2009, for Ms Barbara Wilding to sign as a sworn truthful affidavit. This criminal act of deliberate non disclosure of evidence sparked an early retirement, also, to protect her pension despite the blatant deceit in having me gaoled so many times only to be latter acquitted. This is why, of course, these now 20 police files have taken 11 years to reach the surface despite a string of failed court orders.

Detective Superintendent Stuart Mackenzie Retrospective Statement 24th June 12020

They had all lied by putting together Wilding’s 25th February 2009 sworn affidavit, as these 20 odd files of sensitive police material so portray but, of course, taking the lid off the ‘can of worms’ in their ‘Trading in machine guns’ conspiracy, trial T20097445, when no defence needed to be tendered for an obviously predicted acquittal.

A Helpful Chronology for New Readers

The ‘Elephant in the Room’, no one was to mention, of course, was because their chief constable was, at the time, defending the now notorious BS614159 plus 2 civil damages claims following police having lost 40 odd malicious criminal prosecutions. My resultant civil damages claim required as many as 300 witnesses with 100 of which being police officers, serving and retired.

     
So, did no one in the South Wales Police simply have asked me, especially while visiting police stations after the 29th May 2009 decision by Mackenzie and MAPPA to have me arrested?

I will relish doing a second statement on how the culture of South Wales Police compels otherwise good officers to do obvious wrong on this occasion Officers are called off normal duties to answer a  “Get Kirk” fatwa. Tis corrupting cultire at SWp puits the public at risk and officers more senior than McKenzie would be involved:-  

The jury did not see these police at all believable or credible and here is spelling out each detail of why………

·        Critical – Who appointed McKenzie as SIO?

·        What was McKenzie actually to do because why such attention over a matter (couple of old cartridges with a dummy gun that if it could fire a single shot was too dangerous to actually use) is so simple a local constable could deal with by asking MK in for a chat and asking – ‘Where is this gun Sir?’  

·        Why does McKenzie say the policy decision of 29 May 2009 included ‘MK visiting HQ to arrest CC’ when that happened weeks later?  

·        If MK was to be a firearms risk …………why only with an era of gun too unsafe to fire? They show absolutely no interest in real risk of someone of MK’s clever ability going nuts and collecting real modern firearms   

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Machine-gun Conspiracy to have me Shot is now Proven

BLOODY FOOLS

Why did not Mr plod simply ring me up to ask where my Farnborough Air show aircraft was now?

OR, OR ask me, while I attended the four police station visits, between 29th May and 22nd June 2009, complaining of their bullying, the time when police HQ had finally plucked up their yellow bellied courage to arrest me over three weeks later when they thought it was safe enough?

I refer, of course, to ‘Operation Chalice’ , 20 odd, some armed police, with helicopter simply to have me shot and if that failed put the bloody fear into my wife and child by using social workers, trying to take our 10 year old Genevieve into Vale of Glamorgan care?

  1. Amazing 20 South Wales Police arch-leaver Defence Files, unlawfully hidden for over 10 years, including from my 2010 ‘Trading in Machine criminal trial , carrying a mandatory 10 year prison term, were only disclosed to me last week but only by yet another court order

Case number 1CF03361

In The Cardiff County Court

Maurice John Kirk

Claimant

And

The Chief Constable of South Wales Constabulary

Defendant

DRAFT                  Two Million Pound Damages Claim                  1CF03361

Introduction

A Disclosure of 20 lever arch files from the Defendant was received for me at Cardiff County Court on 12 October 2020. Dolman, solicitors’ QC told the bemused Judge Beard, residing,  that Adrian Oliver, partner in Dolmans of Cardiff, that he was refusing to serve them on me in electronic form for fear his ‘busted flush’, that has earned his firm m illions of pounds, so far, since their unlawful harassment of me started in 1993 , defending successive chief constables from 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions. The nefarious conduct of his client would be all over the websites, he indicated, in a matter of minutes if disclosed electronically. This would reveal the extreme level of police bullying and criminal conduct by so that many other in positions of privilege would be also published world-wide. I refer, of course, to far too many within in the welsh judges, HM Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) welsh prison administration and HM Parole Service (Wales)

  • The 20 lever arch files start with the first 10 files covering the original prosecution papers from 2009/10. There are five files that are a defence statement by Stuart McKenzie SIO (Senior Investigating Officer) along with his attachments. There are  five files that are a defence statement and attachments by the Deputy SIO Suzanne Hughes.

The evidence missing from Disclosure include

Little mention of the armed 20 plus strong police Operation Chalice helicopter raid to snatch our then 10 year old daughter or having me shot.

  • The Disclosure only goes back to February 2009. When the prosecution charges for both offences are dated over a year earlier:-

“…..the particulars of the offence being that between the 1st day of January 2008 and the 23rd day of June 2009, ….”

  • I ask for both explanations as to why such an obvious if not highly improper approach to deny Disclosure.  
  • Also missing is…. to follow Coopers’, buyers of aircraft, with ‘gun’ detained for interrogation on 1968 firearms Act allegations of alleged offences contrary to law.

Where the Defendant fails to provide a defence or explanation

  • The Defendant give no defence or even an attempt to explain why they did not treat me as others and ask the CAA to contact me. I challenge the defendant to explain.
  • The police give no defence on anything. What was the point? There QC, Lloyd Jones had already told the court he had been informed from Judge Keiser Qc I was not going to be allowed a jury nor would the hearing of evidence take more than5 days!!!!
  • The police give no explanation as to why

Critical flaw in arguments

  • Mr Cooper purchased the gun from me in August 2008 and he and many others made various changes to the Lewis display gun in the 17 months from sale to trial.
  •  
  • Additionally, Suzanne Hughes is then faced with Mr Cooper’s solicitor contacted SWP to say Mr Cooper will say the gun has been tampered with.
  •  
  • Suzanne Hughes tries to counter the obvious need to stop the prosecution by saying Mr Scott will cast doubt on what Mr Cooper says as unreliable.
  •  
  • But if Police are using Mr Scot to discredit the reliability of Mr Cooper as a witness as to the condition of the Lewis display gun. Then police have absolutely no witnesses and absolutely no evidence as to what condition the Lewis display gun was at the point of sale and in my ownership before that.
  •  
  • It follows South Wales Police and Suzanne Hughes knew with certainty that there were no grounds to charge, remand and continue with a prosecution.
  •  
  • Additional questions I seek answered……. To follow with further publications of docs created during my pranks to further expose their inherent deceit.
  •  
  • This exposed criminal conduct is set out in these 20 odd now released police files with such things as the 20+ police strong armed helicopter raid on our home, in the Vale of G Glamorgan on the 22nd June 2009 in Operation Chalice are unlawfully omitted from files.
  1. Aim to have me arrested/shot while the other police raid, a few hours later, to snatch our then 10 year old daughter, Genevieve, also withheld from court ordered disclosure.
  2. Also, no Nottinghamshire police criminal investigation disclosure, I had specifically asked for, in also detained Jerry and Jenny Cooper, the latter having collected the film prop from replica Battle of the Somme machine gun, many months before, police had plucked up the courage, for 27 senior police meetings in Barbara Wilding’s HQ, to press the action stations button. SUBSTANTIAL REWARDS FOR ANY INTERNAL INFORMATION from retired police…… maurice@kirkflyingvet.com tel 07708586202

A seven figure exemplary damages claim is due to come my way plus recovery of my huge costs in my defending this malicious criminal prosecution.

To be paid by the Chief Constable of South Wales Police Constabulary? No, in your dreams as Barbara Wilding, with her corrupt police officers, Adrian Oliver and others at Dolman’s, solicitors, Cardiff and other lying prosecution witnesses now face my prepared private criminal prosecutions.

The excessive perversion of justice, set out in these, until now, 20 police files, indicate a deliberately concocted plan stop my my numerous civil claims identifying welsh police’s 40 odd failed maliciously brought police criminal prosecutions,

PAY OUT TIME

All those who helped me be acquitted of all charges, requiring no rebuttal and while I was held in Cardiff prison for nearly 8 months, send in your details of costs.

Also a detailed statement on any aspect in the abuse of process of that shambolic two week highlighting any perverse issue you may have witnessed

Sky and another TV company have already expressed interest in a ‘documentary this usual and extreme level of deceit within senior staff of South Wales Police HQ in Bridgend.

contact me 24/7 on 07708586202 maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

The 20 police files will be published over the next few weeks to stimulate those who know anything about the CAA causing ‘gun’s on other British aircraft being frantically decommissioned

I will be handing out Cash, lots of Cash for info also on photos of My DH2 taken in august 2008 and August 2009 etc

WATCH THIS SPACE

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Abuse of Process Applications to Cardiff Courts

I have had delivered to Cardiff County Court my 25 page personal witness statement carefully written, for my readers from around the world, to simply reveal the multi thousands of UK’s funds simply to have me gaoled for a minimum 10 years, anything, just anything, to stop my million pound damages claim against the South Wales Police

 
 
 

the cause

for their 40 odd lost malicious criminal prosecutions case number, now blocked for an appeal , BS614159 plus 8

BUT THAT IS NOT WHY I enclose this early draft for RCJ on how disgusting the welsh penal system is- but who gives a dam other than those incarcerated ?

Exeter Crown court, shortly, will hear the outcome of John Graham’s prison stopped letters, a courtdisturbance to warrant the complainant being gaoled

As usual I buy all who attend a very good lunch, paid for in advance owing to the unusual ciecumstances all generated by the south Wales Police, chief senior prosecutor NS Evans Esq and His Honour Judge Di Evens not stopping this wicked situation from contimuing.

But, of course, the dreaded Covid 19 is endangering each of the above’s incomes with 5000 Crown court trials, is it, put on ‘hold’ so , of course they must boost their respective pensions by dragging on any futile case they can generate or however absurd and bizarre South Wales Police case they can throw at their ‘gravy train’ system.

WHY, for promotion as CPS Richard Thomlow had decided to quickly become a judge for criminally pursuing myT20097447 ‘machine gun’ criminal prosecution. Just as DC Hughes, female police officer that had sneaked into each day of my machine gun criminal trial despite, as prosecution witness, reporting evidence on oath, each day , as promised promotion which she promptly GOT!

JOHN GRAHAM, also a prosecution witness, has since tried to obtain return of his stolen communications with me, by Cardiff and Parc, Bridgend welsh prisons.

26 September 2020

REQUEST FOR AN INTERNAL REVIEW

Dear Mr. Jukes,

Creator of my inspiration to expose just ‘what really goes on in our law Courts’

Seeing as I am denied my F.O.I.A. [S.A.R.]  / Data Protection Act request sent already [and attached to this message] to yourself, and after receiving the letter below [attached also] from a Mr. Jason Jenkins, a “Disclosure Officer” of S. Wales police I hereby ask for a formal internal review regarding the denial of my request.

It is believed the S. Wales police force does have the letter referred to in my request as Mr. Kirk was criminally charged and remanded in custody connected to the letter addressed to myself [amongst others] written by Mr. Kirk whilst previously resident in prison earlier in 2019, the letter allegedly having allegedly a possibly noxious “white substance” on it. This letter was stopped from being sent to myself by prison authorities / police at the time. The criminal charge of the letter which was attempted to be sent to myself has subsequently been dropped by the CPS.

I have already sent 3 forms of ID pertaining to myself after your request for ID.

For your information, the addition / amendment not sent with my written request, which was sent to Mr. Jukes at the S Wales police HQ at Cowbridge Rd. via recorded delivery R. Mail, is:

” Sent: 18 September 2020 10:59
To: matt.jukes@south-wales.pnn.police.uk <matt.jukes@south-wales.pnn.police.uk>
Subject: F.A.O.: Chief Constable Mr. M. Jukes, S. Wales police – Update to my F.O.I.A. / Data Protection Act / S.A.R. request

TO: Chief Constable of S. Wales police: Mr. M. Jukes, Police HQ., Cowbridge Rd., Bridgend, S. Wales,  CF31 3SU

FROM:  Mr. J. G. Graham

18 September 2020

UPDATE TO MY F.O.I.A. / D.P.A. Request to the Chief Constable Mr. M. Jukes, dated and sent 17 Sept. 2020:

Dear Mr. Jukes, Chief Constable of S. Wales police:

Please refer to my F.O.I.A. request to you, sent via R. Mail and also attached to this message. I apologise for leaving out an important part of my FOIA / Data Protection Act / S.A.R. request to you – that is:

Mr. Maurice Kirk [d.o.b. 12/03/1945, Somerset, UK]  was charged by the police in mid-2020 with:

” attempting to send a substance which caused distress to another [approx. May 2019] – the letter was stopped from leaving the prison last May 2019″

Mr. Kirk was in prison at the time of sending this letter, it being addressed to myself prior to it being stopped from leaving the prison, by authorities. This charge to Mr. Kirk was subsequently dropped in approximately June 2020.

My FOIA requests asks for a copy of this letter which was stopped as it had an alleged “substance” on it which might [qu.] “caused distress to another” [unqu.] – as it obviously exists as Mr. Kirk was charged with attempting to send it to myself. I request any other letters pertaining to myself that were not sent to me from either HMP Parc or HMP Cardiff from Mr. Kirk, during the times Mr. Kirk was resident in either of these prisons, whether they had any alleged “substances” on them or not.

The letter relating to the charge that was dropped for Mr. Kirk was referred to in part by the S. Wales police officer who wrote by email to myself – a copy of that email dated 06th July 2020 from officer “Brynsley Richards” of S. Wales police being sent with my 1st and original FOIA request letter to you sent on the 17 September 2020 via Royal Mail Recorded Delivery 1st class.  My F.O.I.A. request and attachment is attached to this email.

Thank you.

signed:  J. Graham

Posted in Uncategorized | 25 Comments

Welsh Court Corruption Crosses the River Severn

I have, again, just witnessed our UK’s oh so outdated but lucrative self-generating judicial industry, Buckland’s dream for both England and Wales’ law courts to promote huge wealth only amongst themselves, if my recent scandalous court proceedings is anything to go by!

Buckland: united Wales and England ‘best for the law’

South Wales Police used HMP Parc South Wales and HMP Cardiff to obtain my five years behind bars as I had published proven facts in my many civil claims against the bullies while simply seeking compensation.

This fabricated protracted imprisonment was dependent on their now sacked police blackmailed doctor originating from their psychiatric unit by South Wales Police cruelly provoking a ‘menage a trois’ like conspiracy within their walls in order for the doctor to maliciously falsify my medical records when deemed unfit to practice.

Where South Wales Police failed fabricated prosecutions really kicked off, in 19193, to my current posting heroin to an MP in Westminster by Cardiff prison letter also doomed to failure leaving only one outstanding, apparently, so watch this space!

This simple fact has been ruthlessly covered up by no less than twenty welsh judges over the past 10 years.

Why? Back in the 90s the bullying South Wales Police had lost over 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions which had justified attempts for a mere Englishman seeking civil redress in a welsh court, gaol.

By my almost 39 years of civil claims, such as 90’s cases, BS614159 and now 8 more, are used as a proverbial ‘shuttle-cock’ between RCJ’s HM Court of Appeal and Cardiff’s so-called Civil Justice Centre, to delay and delay, so Buckland can sneakily obtain, for the land of his father’s, judicial autonomy to promote welsh avarice.

This self-promoting verbal diarrhoea, for personal gratification in our UK’s judicial system is simply a ‘smoke screen’ with those in positions of privilege answerable to no one and clearly include, ‘giving not a fig’ for their own draft ‘rule of law, current Lord Chancellor’s for his mates.

flaking police painted silver paint to fool the Cardiff Jury

Before I refer to the most recent court public scandal, all originating from South Wales perverse authorities, I touch on another South Wales Police malicious attempt to have me sectioned to Ashworth, for life, due to their failed malicious criminal prosecutions. My ‘trading in machine guns’ to ‘shoot the Lord Mayor of Cardiff only concluded with an ignominious Cardiff Crown court acquittal, requiring no defence and a fine of £50 never to be paid.

This is due in a Cardiff court on Monday, 12th October 2020 but the 10 years of unlawful failed disclosure, contrary to CPR, is common place in welsh law courts.

I made an application, nearly a year ago, to the welsh prison authorities, for the return of my very great number of prison stolen letters from within those prison walls but who cares was their reply. Some of my letters from within had even been written for my criminal appeal for a wicked severely unjust two-year prison term for simply having spoken the truth. That was why.

Can you imagine living with a false psychiatric report while trying to fly the world in some WW2 aircraft? I have been unfairly gaoled in numerous foreign counties due to this travesty of justice but not a judge in Wales has the moral fibre to resolve the ongoing situation.as all are simply waiting for me to die.

My stolen HM Royal Courts of Justice bound letters included, would you believe, even those from their own prosecution witnesses against me such is the venom within these welsh authorities. John Graham Esq’s dozen or so letters were stopped by both HMP Cardiff or HMP Parc with many full of much needed 1st Class postage stamps. He was their own prosecution witness!

The welsh have made a complete fool of the English court authorities, where that particular criminal allegation was concerned, quashed on the first opportunity once it had been transferred to England and because my letters to the then HM Secretary of State for Wales Alun Cairns, seeking help, were amongst the stopped prison letters by G4S and HMP Cardiff.

I have just been to yet another pre-arranged law court, I am not allowed to name, so as to cover up welsh authority fraud, is not the ‘first’ time for me! But to hear the presiding judge admit he could not properly consider my applications for freedom, over an 18-month period, was enough for me to gather up my court files and walk out in utter disgust.

He did not even order the release of my stolen court papers, within the stolen prison letters, despite my letting the court system know so long in advance. Was it all a big game for him as my 12th October 2020 1CF03361 ‘trading in machineguns’ claim had originated in Wales or was its one million pound civil claim was now not enough?

Apparently, it turned out that the welsh authorities, for over the past 18 months, had been circulating these my prison stopped letters, confidential legal papers and Caswell Clinic medical records, robbed from me by G4S prison staff on my 1st November 2019 to Dolmans, solicitors and CPS both defending the South Wales Chief Constable.

This meant all had to be withheld from the current presiding judge as far too embarrassing for this foreigner, like him, in an English court of all places, could not be tainted with the South Wales Police’s latest conspiracy in order to pervert the course of justice.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

source: https://mauricejohnkirk.com/2020/11/03/threat-to-kill-lord-mayor-of-cardiff-re-secretary-of-state-for-wales/

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Archive [here] continues [from 2011]

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Maurice Kirk: South Wales Police Squander Huge Amounts of Cash just to Preserve Their Chief Constable’s Pension + Dolmans solicitors police fraud 01 Nov. 2020 + archive

from: https://www.mauricejohnkirk.com

South Wales Police Squander Huge Amounts of Cash just to Preserve Their Chief Constable’s Pension

DRAFT

Police Stratagem to Arrest Maurice John Kirk or Get Him Shot

This is a very telling only just disclosed anonymous document from Dolmans’, the chief constable’s private lawyers defending so many of my substantial damages claims brought by me due to 40 odd failed police and Dolmans assisted malicious criminal prosecutions.

Aer signing the visitor’s book I am rapidly surrounded by armed police sporting tin hast and stun grenades

This Strategy memo was deliberately withheld from my T20097445 ‘trading in machine guns’ jury trial in 2010 as it again reveals the delay from South Wales Police seeing the replica Lewis machine gun on the WW1 DH2 replica biplane, advertised worldwide so many times, suggests that as ‘exchange’ of BS614159 witness statements’ with Dolmans was due no later than 4pm on the 19th June 09 by court order and I had already phoned earlier in the day and week on when and where will ‘exchange’ take place. It was abundantly clear to me Dolmans had no intention of expediting the court order civil trial had to be buried alongside me.

South Wales Police record that I went to Barry police station on several occasions indicating I needed to serve witness summonses on serving police officers., I left ones for officers, Inspector Trigg, Sergeant Rice and PC Nicholas Khilberg at least, eye witnesses on multiple arrest incidents concluding in my favour.

The 15th June 09 MAPPA level 3 meeting, in Barry police station, just down the road from my veterinary hospital included the police blackmailed doctor and senior social worker from Caswell clinic who’s notes also recorded that I was ‘likely to be shot’ in the planned armed police helicopter raid on our home, in South Wales.

Called under covert name, ‘Operation Challis’ a parallel planned raid was set up, if I was arrested and not shot. That was ‘Operation Dandelion’, which was launched as I was taken away in handcuffs to closed down Port Talbot police station for days of questioning. Police and social workers arrived at the family home to snatch our then 10-year old daughter, Genevieve, to be taken into Vale of Glamorgan Council Care as I was now a registered in the top 5% most dangerous MAPPA level3/3 victim.
.

Despite my arrest had been agreed on or before 1st June, at the police HQ AIG meeting many weeks before, it was further delayed by both 8th and 15th June 2009 MAPPA level 3/3 covert meetings in Barry and Bridgend police stations. Police records now release, 11 years later, that they already had known about the world-wide advertisement of my film replica ‘gun’ and knew exactly where it was in 2008.

Why? The Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, had just instigated her ‘shoot to kill;’ policy into the Metropolitan police force as if a parting gift from their Deputy Chief Constable. Her remedy for ridding herself of my continuing irritation and nuisance to the South Wales Police force, by generating such adverse publicity, was obvious.

It was also obvious both me and my 100 plus arch lever files, accurately recording both her and predecessor’s criminal conduct, including 40 odd failed prosecutions, was to be covered up in the bizarre Cardiff Civil Justice Centre hearings.

My BS614159 +10 substantial damages claims, in those days exceeded one million pounds in my claims for damages and Dolmans’ fiddled costs, alone, exceeded one million. Dolmans refuse to disclose the ‘break down of its bill of costs for fear of the media from proven fraud. I refer especially to the documents Adrian Oliver personally had drafted for both criminal and civil courts, for others to sign as true.

The manner in which Oliver had personally had me nearly shot on Sunday 21st October was from maliciously instructing one of his office staff to visit Cardiff’s central police station on the Saturday morning triggering the chaotic execution of Operation Challis and Operation Dandelion, on our quiet country home, was only partly prepared owing to the un fortunate absence of both Detective Chief Superintendent Stuart McKenzie and 2nd in command, Detective Inspector Suzanne Hughes, were considering on the Friday afternoon. “Why don’t I just ring up Maurice and ask him if he knows where the replica WW1 biplane went after he had sold it after flying his aircraft in the 2000 Farnborough Air Show”?

Yours for £130,000 with Carp lake

But on the Saturday with a signed Dolmans written complaint of my ‘threat to cause criminal damage caused Oliver, also wishing to hide adverse publicity, pressed that I should be immediately.

Under Judge Seys Llewellin, I only just recently found out was the most senior judge in Wales, had me banned from the Cardiff’s criminal and civil courts’ public counters for 10 years, making sure he left no tell-tale audit trail as to the real reasons why?

The same judge also attempted to bury his disastrously managed many weeks of oral evidence, from 99 witnesses, ever to see ‘the light of day’.

For a further16 months he delayed my appeal to the RCJ until sealing his 2013 inaccurate judgment on the day of his retirement and which had given sufficient time for the RCJ to say the laws had changed, meantime, making an appeal from Wales no longer available to the RCJ and only allowed to be heard in Wales!

Now refused at the RCJ’s HM Court of Appeal back to appeal BS614159 in the Cardiff Civil court, as I was now registered MAPPA 3/3 most dangerous with police continuing to deliberately concoct evidence to having me ‘lawfully’ shot to stop my civil claim ‘risk’ to her pension with the now new 1CF03361 two million pound damages claim, wrongfully prosecuted for ‘trading in machine guns’. Police had painted the dummy film prop back to black and had unblocked the piece of water pipe, imitating the gun barrel, in an attempt to fool the jury.

I had only the day before, remember on 18th June when I was well inside the South Wales Police’s Bridgend HQ and even had gained entry to the Chief Constable’s inner sanctum with my ‘exchange’ civil claim witness file tucked under my arm

Judge Seys llewellyn

Why didn’t anyone ask me about the film prop ‘gun’ then? About ten of them, many in ant flak jackets carrying automatic rifles, stun grenades and sporting tin hats surrounded me and not only searched me and my car thoroughly (an assault) only then allowed to leave, after rounding up my three legged terrier they had allowed to be let loose, After a senior female officer, Griffiths, conferred with Wilding ,refusing her to accept the file on Wilding’s behalf I quickly signed the visitors book as proof, at least to the judge, Seys Llewellyn, well , at least I had tried.

The Fabricated Facts to avoid the already doomed machine-gun trial
South Wales Police had painted the ammunition magazine from silver back to black and had unblocked the water pipe imitation ‘barrel’ to try and fool the jury

While we all hunted for our three-legged Jack Russel, Jacques, around the grounds of the police station I casually asked the police men present if their search had discovered any machine guns about or live ammunition for it?

I have always thought the premature arrest of me was a Mr Plod ‘knee jerk’ right hand on the 20th of June not knowing what the left hand was doing as it is revealed the statement of Dolmans’ hand written letter, dated on the Saturday 20th, while Detective Chief Superintendent Stuart McKenzie was in transit to a conference somewhere in England at the time, Adrian Oliver insistence I be arrested with no further delay.

Had he overlooked the ‘Foxy’ witness statement he had drafted just a week or so earlier for the police woman to sign ‘he’ had telephoned my wife who in tune had told me a woman had phoned enquiring about the WW1 Lewis machine gun with ammo for sale? Eight of the jury, after my 9th Feb 2010 acquittal, told me and members of my family it must have been first an undercover police woman now switched to a man giving the behind the screen to hide his identity. Possibly on maternity leave.

Having witnessed Adrian Oliver’s lies and read so many of his drafted witness statements for those to give evidence and had unlawfully failed disclosure incidents all screams bias in these welsh law courts so much so the welsh police were dependent on the power of ‘authority’ the same’ authority’ that adversely prejudiced my family’s Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons to cut off my income needed to fund the now ten or so damages claims against the welsh authorities including the police, HMP prisons and specifically named members of the Caswell clinic psychiatric prison just down the road from the G4S prison and police HQ,

All very cosy with almost all of the 113 criminal allegations thrown at me, while trying to practice veterinary science in the Vale of Glamorgan, came from the same close-knit police cabal but losing 89% of the malicious criminal prosecutions in court, if not withdrawn by the HM Crown Prosecution Service as plain stupid.

Prosecuted for ‘smuggling’ pigs into Ireland from a farmer’s field outside Cowbridge, in a 1950 two seat Piper Colt, seven times my refusing to produce any driving documents at all when ordered to by a uniformed police officer, for ‘speeding’ when it turned out the police representative , in court, had all the time, in his file, a clear photograph of the driver, one of my ‘work man’ that lead to an arrerst, a gang of South Wales Police had caused my Cardiff surgery front door to be smashed in by sledge-hammer to assist squatters to enter my premises, again, with the Chief Superintendent’s pregnant daughter and cause more substantial criminal damage are but a few of the CPS blocked criminal prosecutions once the truth, from my cross examinations, began to leak out.

It was the CPS, remember, as recorded in the June 2009 MAPPA level 3 meeting minutes was opposed, from the start, in having me arrested on once owning what may have been, at the time, a prohibited weapon. The CPS consulted and at the MAPPA meeting explained that it was my intent on serving at least 40 odd witness summons before trial commenced only to be achieved by following the daily ‘school run’ to respective homes as each police station, in turn, Cardiff, Barry and Llantwit Major had all refused ‘acknowledgment of service’ of £40 paid for at a time witness subpoenas. Even blocked at the airport for service on a air traffic controller, where I has intimidated by police with guns surrounding me stating that if I did not leave the Cardiff airport, immediately, I would be arrested.

That daft but dangerous incident arose in the frightening low level, even for me, police helicopter chase terrifying the pilot with me so much we had to put the D-Day cub down in first appropriate farmers very rough and almost too small 200-yard field.

Oliver’s misleading police signed MG11 witness statements, such as Barbara Wilding ‘s 6 weeks late affidavit ,contrary to court order and the countless other Dolmans drafted witness statements (almost 100 of them) some clearly bungled to be false, purported to be those of serving eye witnessing officers on their beat, over the years, had finally triggered my arrest due to a hoax ‘girt brick’ potential through his solicitor’s office window.

This left floundering police in Port Talbot police station that 22nd June 2009 night clearly not knowing how to proceed as they were now about to be faced with not just all the medical reports from Caswell Clinic already ordered, those of my own GP of 18 years, PEH specialists and hordes of CAA medical professionals all contradicting what they wanted, that I had relevant ‘brain damage’ and a ‘mental disorder’ of PDD sufficient for me to be locked away, for life, in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital because the planned assassination on me had gone ‘belly up’ due to Dolmans week-end interference to have caused someone senior to press the ‘panic button’ to launch Operations Challis and Dandelion.

The police were now faced with forensic psychiatrist, Dr Bridget Craddock, having examined me in the station, also stating the police black mailed Caswell Clinic doctor was a liar when misleading the MAPPA covert meetings.

The consequences of their joint actions caused the 5 years loss in my life, loss of my wife, health, wealth and damned near my sanity.

There are £1000 rewards to anyone who can significantly enhance my current predicament with donating new evidence in my civil claims against the Welsh authorities brought by an Englishman hoping for justice in a welsh court room.


Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Tel 07708586202

http://www.kirkflyingvet.com
mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com
maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dolmans Solicitors Police Fraud

Adrian Oliver, senior partner, continues to enjoy immunity to criminal prosecution, only because he is in Cardiff and because he is defending the South Wales Chief Constable in Barbara Wilding’s 2009 ‘machine-gun’ conspiracy when attempting to having me shot.

To have me shot for welsh police losing over 40 malicious criminal prosecutions.

Now, the machine -gun civil claim enters its 11th year not a patch on my civil claim BS614159 etc (40failed prosecutions) as that goes on now into its 3rd decade, not unlikeJarndyce and Jarndycein dickens’ Bleak House.

Why? well the corrupt welsh first stopped my entering the court building for nearly 10 years, to slow me down and because the HM Royal Courts of Justice are refusing, due the stench of it, to allow to hear my appeal with its transcripts and court log records confiscated — what really goes on in our welsh law courts.

The police bullying continues…….

CASE NO:1CF03361

& D00CF279

IN THE CARDIFF COUNTY COURT

MAURICE JOHN KIRK

Claimant

and

CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES CONSTABULARY

Defendant

This is an N244 Application (Cases 1CF03361 and D00CF279) to vary and remove all sanctions in the Order 31 May 2019 and for Directions as to how to proceed when not understanding past Court Directions and Orders. And is made in response to a Cardiff County Court email message 14 January 2019 to the unrepresented Claimant from HHJ Keyser QC, kindly explaining the meaning of the Order 31 May 2019 that the stay is lifted as from 9 January 2020 and the Claimant should now make this application promptly.

Introduction

.

  1. The Defendant have for ten years stood by what Dr XX says in his reports as a part of the Lewis Gun prosecution 2009 as true reliable fair and accurate. Yet as a part of this Lewis Gun case Dr XX in his report to the Cardiff Crown Court 30 September 2009 point 11 says:-

“…My current preliminary position is that whilst Maurice Kirk is fit to plead, his difficulty in organising ……as a result of brain injury……..he would be unable to conduct his own defence”

  • As Dr XX says the Claimant has significant “irreversible” brain damage it follows that by what Dr XX says in 2009 may apply in 2019 so that the Claimant would be unable to organise a complex case at a Court.
  • If the Defendant does not stand by Dr XX as being true reliable fair and accurate then that opens up how the Defendant has maliciously and dishonestly imprisoned the Claimant from 2011 to 2019 based on prosecution papers that the Defendant knew was untrue and as a way to obstruct the Claimant’s ability to progress his civil proceedings. Which the Claimant believes is what has happened. 
  • Importantly to understand the deceit by the Defendant and prove they have done wrong by dishonesty at the Courts and to have interfered with the Claimant’s ability to progress civil proceedings, we do not need to go into whether the Claimant was guilty of harassment of the doctor who wrote false and malicious reports.
  • We only need to look at how the Defendant when bring prosecution deceitfully portraying the doctor as all good having done no wrong and the Claimant as all bad. So that the sentencing and subsequent harsh treatment was grossly disproportionate for the Claimant ‘rationally’ saying the truth that under the Section 12 annual and periodic renewal process of Mental Health Act 1983, the public and UK wide profession needs to know.
  • It is the proportionality of the sentence and harshness of the treatment there after, as a result of deceit, malice and dishonesty (by not admitting the serious, if not criminal wrong Dr XX does) is actually how the Defendant has interfered in the Claimant’s ability to progress his civil cases and the Lewis Gun case civil claim.      
  • In short the Defendant has directly and indirectly deliberately triggered so many problems for the Claimant that a normal person could not manage Court procedure and deadlines with the Defendant causing so many civil and criminal proceedings and disputes, all with intense detail and while the Claimant has a loss of liberty with legal papers confiscated and formal post to and from Courts and relevant parties blocked or withheld.
  • While experiencing loss of liberty the Claimant had a number of potentially serious health issues where because the Defendant triggers the Claimant be dealt with harshly so that access to care became an embroiled dispute. And physical assaults occurred on top of potentially serious physical medical problems. Yet while all this occurred the Claimant was left without adequate medical care.
  • Also from what the Defendant caused while at the Bail Hostel for a short period, the Claimant was singled out for a different set of conditions which were far stricter and harsher regime to his peers. Again this led to more dispute casework.   
  1. The problems and number of disputes and issues are by far too many, too detailed and too hard going for the Client/lawyer relationship to cope. And the cost of trying to fight back in defence using lawyers is far too expense for any lay person.

The Defendant Interfered and obstructed the main substantive civil case hearing in Cardiff in 2013

  1. The Claimant takes this opportunity to point out that the Defendant improperly used one of the four criminal prosecutions over Dr XX (based on evidence they knew was untrue) to prevent the Claimant being able to organise and have essential police evidence and witnesses in the 2013 main BS614159 substantive hearing into the wrongdoing by South Wales Police.   

The Claimant is not understanding what to do.

  1. The unrepresented lay Claimant genuinely cannot understand Court Orders and what is required of him and that includes how he was supposed to respond in case D00CF279. The Claimant does not understand how to go about listing his Document when the Defendant’s lawyers block the Claimant reading their Documents. And other example is, do Documents listed in the Further Particulars need to be again listed in a list of Documents?    

The Defendant provoke problems from Multi Agencies as a way to obstruct the Claimant from taking part in civil proceedings

  1. Regards the material time to comply with Court Orders. It took all manner of failed attempt by lawyers to try to urgently protect the Claimant by addressing huge problems, to only then realise that the Claimant and Claimant’s lawyer’s time is wasted trying to get an organisation to treat the Claimant fairly if the Defendant as police (and senior police) use their authority to tell the organisation to do different and the Defendant as police impose organisations use false information and cause organisations to treat the Claimant harshly and unfairly .
  1. When the Lewis Gun case prosecution failed and the Defendant has use and continue obvious events within the Lewis Gun case to imprison the Claimant each year since the Lewis Gun case ended in 2010.
  1. A simple way to get through a decade of detail is to compare the 2008/9 Lewis Gun case with the last prosecution by the Defendants knew what they saying was not true fair reasonable or proportionate.
  1. The Defendant as senior police control Multi Agency working and the information on which multi agencies make decisions regards the Claimant.  
  1. Intensely false criminal records – including child abuse and fire arms Narcotics, ABH and FTA false convictions. So many false entries the problem is hard to deal with.
  • False and wildly exaggerated risk assessments are caused by endless untrue comments on top of a false criminal history. So many false comments they are hard to deal with.
  • Being wrongly regarded as very high risk causes loss of liberty and rights to further obstruct the Claimant and triggers he be treated harshly and unfairly. Which again leads to so very many problems and disputes they are hard to deal with.
  • The Defendant triggered obstructing if not blocking access to health care leading to considerable hardship and more disputes that arise where they resist the Claimant be allowed his basic rights. Which over the last two-year sentence led to so many problems and disputes they are hard to deal with.
  • Parole decisions were based on false data maliciously supplied by police to cause extra prison terms in all convictions and in both prison recalls
  • The G4S subculture take it upon themselves that given the Defendant senior police say such of the Claimant that G4S not only can obstruct the Claimant’s legal papers and proceedings but are free to subject the Claimant to beatings and bullying and also to get the fellow violent prisoners to do same to the Claimant. Again, there were so many incidents which are also part of a prison dispute system it is all too much and too difficult to cope with.
  • Things became so wild that when the Claimant sent the usual harmless letters to his English and Welsh MPs streets were sealed off and the Claimant interviewed under caution in case the very small residue of the Claimant’s toothpaste on the back of his letters posed a most serious risk to the public and Members of Parliament. Again, the Defendant saw to it that this ongoing episode was not a small matter so that again made it hard for the Claimant to manage all of the above and the civil proceedings. 
  • The Claimant personal life has turmoil from similar outside of prison and his lawyer along with family has to try to address matters there.
  1. So many intense problems were occurring that the volume of quite unnecessary work caused by the Defendant becomes unmanageable for the Claimant and the huge volume and intensity would undermine any lawyer client relationship and be far too expensive for a normal lay Claimant.      

Claimant needs the Court to explain what is expected of him.

  1. The Claimant needed and still needs the Court to explain to him what was and what now is required of him given the increased complexity.
  1. Normally where a lay Claimant is unable to get legal advice, then the lawyers representing the public sector Defendant would act as Officers of the Court and explain the procedure and what to do next to the lay unrepresented Claimant. But in this case the Defendant’s lawyers act in bad faith.  
  1. The Claimant received an email from Cardiff County Court 14 January 2020 at 15.08pm, saying the Claimant’s email regards not being able to understand the Order 31 May 2019, was put before HHJ Keyser QC who comments:-

”……the case was stayed until 9 January 2020. The stay

is now ended. Any application for relief from sanction

must be made promptly

  • The lay Claimant promptly makes this N244 application because the ex-parte hearing and Order of 31 May 2019 being controlled by the Defendant in the absence of the Claimant, is too far removed from the very obvious truth and facts of the Defendant’s agenda and actions in the 2009 Lewis Gun case at the Crown Court.
  • One main reason to bring an action that is a good use of Court time, is to stop problems continuing.
  • One problem is the aim of the Defendant in bringing the failed Lewis Gun prosecution of 2009 and the subsequent directly four prosecutions, was to prevent the Claimant address his Judicial Review and civil case where both were looming.
  • And that the Defendant continually prosecutes and imprisons the Claimant to obstruct and prevent the Claimant addressing his civil proceedings where the Defendant knows the prosecution papers and police information systems are not true.
  • The Order 31 May 2019 is too far removed from very obvious truth and facts of what the Defendant does to continue their 2008/9 agenda to obstruct the Claimants from taking and addressing civil proceedings by harming the Claimant each year since 2009.
  • So that the Claimant was imprisoned for five years due to blatant deceit by the Defendant, and particularly between 2016/17 to late 2019. – based on papers and police information systems where it is obvious the Defendant did not and cannot possibly believe are true or fair.

New evidence

  • But there is (and will be) much new evidence as to the extent that the Defendant works to harm the Claimant is actually via multi agency collusion and as explained below the deceit and malice by the Defendant and how they aim to obstruct the lay Claimant, – is getting even worse. And without the intervention of the Courts will be indefinite.

The Claimant lives in England and is not safe entering South Wales.    

  • An obvious need is for the case to be transferred to England so that the Claimant can avoid entering South Wales. As the Claimant lives in England not transferring the case would put the Claimant at risk of serious harm. 

Should the Claimant start a new civil action in England regards the Defendant prosecuting using information they know is not true and ask English Court for the Lewis Gun case be drawn into that new civil action?

  • From yet again being recently put in prison it has become obvious to the Claimant that he needs to bring a civil action to stop the Defendant bringing or provoking prosecutions based on details that they know is not proportionate, and so far from what is proportionate, is therefore not true.
  • The information the Defendant knows to be untrue but still continually uses that information to prosecute the Claimant, has arisen out of the 2009 Lewis Gun case. A new civil action would rely on the same papers plus more. The extra would be related the prosecution cases brought by the Defendant since 2009 to 2019 and ongoing. 
  • The Claimant needs to seek legal advice as to whether to state the new claim to include Maladministration, Malfeasance, Misfeasance and Malicious Prosecution (and even nonfeasance for colluding with a medical writer who acted seemingly criminally) as even if convicted a civil action can still be bought in rare situations, such as here where the Defendant cannot possibly believe their own prosecution papers as proportionate and therefore the Defendant knew the prosecution papers were not true. 

Malfeasance – Request to assist, include and monitor the Claimant’s pre action request of the Chief Constable regards 2020.  Or should this be a pre action protocol that is integrated into the Lewis Gun Case?

  • The Claimant seeks time and opportunity to take legal advice on the technicalities of these issues.
  • Possibly Malfeasance can occur if the Chief Constable does not in 2020 personally impose into police systems and procedures, new Decisions and measures by the Chief Constable that ensure the Defendant end their deceit in police information systems and particularly any response by the Defendants lawyers.
  • It can be said these 2020 issues have arisen out of the 2009 Lewis Gun case.
  • The outcome of a new claim around malfeasance could be a way to address the deceitful and dishonest conduct of the Defendant’s internal and external lawyers.

Directions of the Court on potential applications by the Claimant regards solicitors Adrian Oliver’s and Richard Leighton Hill’s conduct during proceedings before the Courts and Warning to Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill regards perverting the Course of Justice  

  • We are all aware responsibility comes with control and that Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill have high level of control over the Defendant, because any Police Officer no matter how senior cannot go against what the Police ‘senior’ lawyers says.
  • If Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill adequately communicate to the Defendant the truth of the horrific wrong that Dr XX has done and also communicate to the Defendant that the false information (see letter form Belinda Kirk 25 July 2019 regards the Defendant totally falsified that the Claimant is a risk to his family)  
  • It follows that the wrongdoing and potentially criminal acts of bring prosecutions based on what they know is not true has occurred quite directly as a result of Adrian Oliver’s and Richard Leighton Hill’s actions and inactions for which they can be personally liable before the criminal and civil courts.
  • The Claimant request Directions form the Court for a date when Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill update on and if that response regards correcting false information (See attached letter 17 July 2019 from Belinda Kirk) and admitting the wrong Dr XX does, is not satisfactory to give directions such as:-.
  1. As to how the false information and highly improper and potentially criminal actions and inactions of Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill be a part of civil proceedings
  • And/or the false information and highly improper and potentially criminal actions and inactions of Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill be part of a new claim in England
  • And/or that to maintain confidence in the profession and the Courts that the Court give Directions for a hearing to sanction and potentially strike off the roll Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill and they can apply to the SRA if the wish to be reinstated. 

Why the Defendant brought a malicious prosecution of the Lewis Gun case when they knew what they were saying was not true was to obstruct and prevent the Claimant in bring civil proceedings.  

  • The context of the Lewis Gun case was according to the MAPPA minutes to prevent the publicity that may occur with the Claimant taking civil proceedings where any normal person can be expected to veer towards thinking that so very many prosecutions there must be wrongdoing by police and those in authority who collude with those police. Please documents see as attached.

Request Order for Disclosure and an Order to read the Defendant’s lawyers documents.

  • Please would the Court Order a date, time and duration and a neutral location such as a conference room in Bristol or Taunton (at a Court or a business room such as a hotel conference room or lawyers firm) where the Defendant’s lawyers must allow the Claimant to read documents.
  • The Defendants lawyers are asked to be able to tell the Court how they will arrange the Document being made available at a neutral venue within easy travelling distance to the Claimant’s home in Taunton.
  • Please could the Court Order disclosure for the Claimant for the Lewis Gun case and also request the Chief Constable to decide the Defendant to stop their deceit 
  • As we are all aware In the UK there has been a major scandal at how police have improperly withheld disclosure at Criminal trials and this scandal is wider spread in the national media and is clearly acknowledged by the Police College who have new procedures to try to ensure police start to disclose adequately.
  • Please can the Court Order the Disclosure that the Claimant should have had in the 2009/2010 Lewis Gun case.
  • Please could the Court Order the Disclosure that the Claimant should have had in the four criminal trials from 2011 to present that have arisen out the dispute of a collusion regards false police MAPPA NHS medical report(s). Where the medical writer colluded with the Defendant via MAPPA in the Lewis gun case and when the Claimant makes protests at their deceit they both (Defendant and medical writer) prosecute the Claimant using information they know is not true. And they also do this to obstruct the Claimant taking civil proceedings regards their deceit and malice in the Lewis Gun case. 

The Claimant’s 2019 lay version of Further Particulars that worries the Defendants as too close to the truth. But did the Defendant obstruct the Claimant complying with civil proceedings by imprisoning the Claimant by a prosecution using information the Defendant knew was untrue? 

  • The Claimant complied with the Court Order to supply Further Particulars by a stipulated date and did so using a lawyer.
  • However, in February 2019 the Claimant could not approve what the lawyer sent to the Court as the Defendant’s arrested the Claimant that weekend in the middle of the period of Claimant meeting with his lawyer.  The lawyer could not meet the claimant in custody during an arrest period and did not know where the Claimant was but rather did a best effort at what the Claimant wished so as not to miss the deadline.
  • Furthermore, it is very obvious that regards at least proportionality or the excessive length of the prison sentence (that meant the Claimant could not meet with his lawyer) is due to the Defendant lawyers and the Defendant being deceitful before the Courts, as to the medical report being blatantly untrue. Or if the medical reports are true to first examine that a prosecution would not be appropriate but rather NHS assessment and care would be appropriate.
  • The fact the Defendant did not start with a reassessment of the medical states of the Claimant shows they brought a prosecution not believing the medical reports that the Claimant protests (or allegedly harasses) about, were true.  
  • Possibly the Court may wish to ignore and put to one side the Defendant’s lawyers panic at a lay version of the truth, until the Chief Constable responds to potential pre action communications regards “a management Decision” of the Chief Constable that there will be no further deceit by the Defendants on specific issues that will be raised?      
  • However especially as the lay Claimant has not failed to comply with an Order to submit Further Particulars, as he did submit a lawyers document on time, but it can appear fair, reasonable and common sense that a lay Claimant if doing a complex case himself for the Claimant to be allowed use his way of explaining the case by his “additional” lay document.

An example where the Order 31 May 2019 is not acknowledging obvious material issues – Please compare the Doctor’s writing with the Caswell Team’s medical evidence quoted below from 2009.  

  • For example we also have to consider that either the Defendant’s August to October 2009 medical report(s) of the Lewis Gun case mean that the Claimant has significant irreversible brain damage (where the rate of deterioration was said to be not known and needs to be monitored/reassessment). And is also delusional in a number of ways. And so should not be expect to cope with complying with Court Directions and Orders. Or if not given the unusual facts (for example that two Radiologists give a normal all clear result 28 August 2009) it follows for all parties should admit the Defendant’s medical report(s) as intentionally false, biased and malicious and so leading to how the Defendant has unlawfully imprisoned the lay Claimant for five years from 2011 to 2019 by the Defendant and their lawyers being deceitful at Courts and it has been the Defendant who has prevented the Claimant from addressing civil proceedings.
  • Please note some detail on the prosecution of cases since 2009 where the Claimant is accused of harassing the writer of the medical reports. If to keep things simple we imagine hypothetically that responses of the Claimant were excessive and so the conviction is not in doubt, we are then left with the prosecution papers are deceitful and dishonest because of if the writer of the medical reports was accurate and the prosecution was honest, then a man with significant irreversible brain damage and with PDD (Paranoid Delusional Disorder) would not have served 5 years in prison. In the well-known farmer Tony Martin who had PDD, when he was convicted of murder (shot at two youths escaping his property) he had a sentence of only 3 years due to PDD (Paranoid Delusional Disorder). 
  • If on the other hand, if the Defendants prosecution cases were to be honest and admitted the bias, deceit, malice and dishonesty of the writer of the medical reports, then either a prosecution would not have proceeded. Or the Claimant would not have served five years in prison because the Claimant would have been recognised as saying the truth that the public and profession need to know. Or the writer of the medical reports could be prosecuted for his exceptional dishonesty before the Courts and to police – on five occasions in five criminal cases between 2009 and 2019.         
  • It must be emphasised that the evidence that Dr XX (and so the Defendant and their lawyers) acted and still acts potentially criminally is very much more. What is said in this document is only a sample in order to be as brief as possible.

The Lewis Gun case 2009 Caswell Clinic Team assessment of the Claimant 

  • An additional dimension is that as part of the Lewis Gun case there was a team assessment by Caswell Clinic the result of which differed to what the doctor who colluded with the Defendant and the 2009 team report page 42 says that the Claimant is not delusion but

“…suffering from a significant degree of anxiety..”

and that

“…continued physical and psychological stress could

have an adverse effect on him in the future…”

  • Suffering from high levels of anxiety often means a person is not normally well enough to conduct complex legal proceedings at the usual pace and speed and would need to be given extra time and leniency.
  • We need to add the extra dimension and extra level of harm was caused by the Defendant’s quite sinister use of a collusion with multi agencies that the Defendant organised from 2009 to the present ‘and indefinitely’, is causing the obstruction that has prevented the Claimant from dealing with all of his civil claims.
  • As explained below the Defendant has been extending their bullying of the Claimant by a deceitful use of multi agency working that would damage anyone’s mental state, so that the Claimant cannot participate in his civil legal proceedings against the Defendant.
  • But then when the Claimant mental state is not the best, to exaggerate that as if the Claimant is a high or highest risk to the community.   
  • The Claimant seeks new Directions that recognise how the Defendant’s trend of deceit and malice within the Lewis Gun case has been continued each year. And the Claimant asks the Court that the truth and facts in the trend of what the Defendant actually does is allowed to become evidence before the Court.

Request Chief Constable personally confirm that specific deceit and dishonesty regards the writer of the Lewis Gun medical reports will not reoccur in prosecutions, any Court papers or in police information systems. 

  • It is therefore becoming obvious that the direction of the claims against the Defendant needs to be varied to address the main problem. Whether by changes to the present claim or by a new claim which can potentially be added to the present claim. With an emphasis on identifying the deceit and dishonesty and to prevent similar deceit in prosecutions and police information systems in future.
  • As we are aware the Chief Constable as the Chief of all police officers staff and lawyers and is liable for what they do. The writer of the Lewis Gun medical reports requested the loss of liberty of the Claimant and the Defendant has continued to use these obviously false reports as if true and accurate. To know how to make requests of the Court or to particularise papers the Claimant requests the Chief Constable personally makes the decision that South Wales Police and it’s information systems, multi-agency communications and it’s lawyers will permanently acknowledge that the writer of the medical reports of 2009 “did some wrong” so contrary to what arrests and prosecutions since 2010 to present, that the Claimant acts with genuine grievance and to specify as explained below

Example of a just some of the criminal case against Dr TW and police who colluded with him that the Chief Constable and Defendant need to act on.

  • The Claimant was Sectioned in August 2009 by the NHS doctor who colluded with the Defendant via MAPPA and potential could be true that the Lewis Gun case would have lost momentum if it were not for this NHS doctor

Does the Claimant have Significant Irreversible Brain Damage? Or is the Defendant dishonest to even a criminal level of deceit?

  • Please see as attached that by 28 August 2009 two Radiologist Dr Aisling Butler and then a second opinion check by Dr Gareth Tudor who are the experts employed by Dr TW’s NHS for being qualified and experienced to interpret Brain Scans said that the result was normal, which the Claimant understands as a message to all other doctors of an all clear.
  • Please see an update 30 September 2009 that Dr XX writes for the Crown Court to request loss of liberty by Section for another month where Dr XX says to apply for a Mental Health Act Section that

“Assessment

The Assessment of Maurice Kirk has concentrated on several areas, mainly the presence or absence of any mental illness and the presence or absence of any traumatic brain injury”       

  • But if we examine Dr XX report of 29 September 2009 which is used as evidence at the Crown Court, Dr XX has totally left out and hidden from the Crown Court that the two Radiologist 28 August 2009 have given a normal all clear result and Dr XX deceitfully states:-

“Maurice Kirk has been referred for detailed brain scans”.

29 September 2009 in point 7

“….suffers with dysfunction of the ventral prefrontal cortex

of the brain….further neuropsychological testing is required

to confirm the severity of such damage.”

29 September 2009 in point 8

“Maurice Kirk has evidence of significant brain damage …..”

29 September 2009 in point 10

  • When in truth the fact is Maurice kirk has already been given a normal all clear result but the deceit goes on to the final report by Dr XX of 19 October 2009 please see the extract attached.
  • Dr XX was the Clinical director responsible for training and controlling that doctors at Caswell Clinic did not go beyond their expertise.
  • But when the brain scan result is normal all clear by 28 August 2009 Dr XX knew he was being dishonest when he wrote formally to the Cardiff Crown Court as a part of proceedings to say there was brain damage while there was no evidence to say that, and if Dr XX was wishing to say there was brain damage Dr TXX knew he would have to use a doctor who medically qualified by trained and experienced in the interpretation of brain scans to provide written evidence.

Claims of Delusions and PDD Paranoid Delusional Disorder are obviously intentionally deceitful assertions that are not based on evidence.

  • Firstly it is not for a doctor when either writing for NHS records or giving evidence to a Court to determine facts and the decisions Courts should make. 
  • If a person is often prosecuted or subject to disproportionate attention by police, that is seemingly unfair Parliament has decided that people should sue the Chief Constable as a means to explore issues and gain accountability. But for Dr XX to say the Claimant is delusional he is persecuted by police Dr XX would have to determine the facts of the Claimant case as being totally without merit and the Defendant has not managed to do that.
  • Dr XX in 2009 implies the Claimant is mentally ill for being concerned as to whether the NHS would covertly put psychiatric medication in his food as if Dr XX says the NHS could never do that so the Claimant must be mentally ill. When DR TW would have known as Clinical Director that the Nursing and Midwifery Council in 2005 and Royal College of Psychiatry in 2008 gave guidelines on when to covertly put psychiatric medication in patients’ food.  
  •  Dr XX tries to discredit the Claimant by saying the Claimant is paranoid or delusional regards occasionally using the word Freemasonry. But the Claimant does not focus on Freemasonry and the oblique references the Claimant may make to Freemasonry would be no different to the National Assembly of Wales and for example one of its past leaders Rhodri Morgan who sought a ban on appointing Freemasons in some key positions. So that as the Claimant does not focus on Freemasonry any more than others the Dr XX would know there is no evidence of delusional behaviour.
  • Essentially every key assertion by Dr XX that the Claimant was delusional can be shown as that Dr XX knew he was being deceitful.
  • There is even a letter by Dr Rose Marnell 3 March 2014 (copy attached) saying there is no evidence of the conditions that Dr XX asserts the Claimant has. And indeed, many other doctors also, confirms a picture that is consistent with Dr XX being malicious and deliberately dishonest and totally deceitful.  

.        

New Witnesses

  • For example, not all in the multi-agency staff colluded but rather could not prevent what the Defendant did. Those multi agency staff from 2009 to present need to become witnesses. As well as multi agency staff who are hostile to the Claimant.  
  • Also the Claimant out of prison is taking statements from numerous people.
  • The Claimant has found a letter 1 June 2010 where the Defendant refuses to investigate wrongdoing by police in the Lewis gun case based on witness statements not disclosed to the Claimant.

Defendant’s influence means endless failed Disclosure. The Claimant now requests, yet again, Court Orders for Disclosure.

  • Caswell Clinic
  • HMP Parc
  • Parole’s Oasysis Assessment
  • Police eligible data where there have been applications since 2009 with MAPPA, MG6D and PII protected evidence having been applied for many times under Subject Access Requests.

Request for an Order regards withheld evidence regards Mr & Mrs Cooper who purchased the Lewis Gun were interviewed under caution but were not prosecuted

  • The Claimant requests an Order for Disclosure regards the evidence the Defendant withheld during the Lewis Gun case in 2009/10 regards Mr & Mrs Cooper who purchased the Lewis Gun from the Claimant
  • South Wales Police were in close contact liaising with Police in Nottingham. That caused Mr & Mrs Cooper who purchased the Lewis Gun from the Claimant to be interviewed under caution and there are tapes and records or why Mr & Ms Cooper were not prosecuted – when the claimant was which South Wales Police had access to and knowledge of but all of which was deliberately hidden from the prosecution process, the Claimant and the trial at Cardiff Crown Court.   
  • The Claimant seeks Order(s) for Disclosure from ‘all’ parties.

Request Disclosure of withheld statements from 2009

  • On 1 June 2012 Detective Inspector Holden of South Wales Police refused to progress the complaint into the Lewis Gun case when obviously there are issues that honest police would need to look at in order to maintain professional standards. But D.I. Holder inadvertently says of statements and evidence obtained by the Defendant in 2009 that were not disclosed to the Claimant in 2009.    
  • For example as a part of the deceit the defendant uses statements from people who are not expert in the relevant issues of firearms law relevant to why the Lewis gun was legal.
  • SWP deliberately and deceitful used quasi-experts to mislead where quasi experts are people or staff who are not experts but rather work a speciality and can useful expertise on what they do, But the quasi expert is not experienced enough to be an expert who can comment with expertise on the wider full picture such as being an expert on contradictions and complications of fire arms law such as is found in the 2015 Law Commission report and the 2009 Consultation.
  • As the Home Office Consults Police forces in a consultation ending May 2009 Police knew the legal issues regards the Lewis Gun within the law earlier in 2009. 
  • Disclosure can help show how the Defendant deceitfully and maliciously manipulated the evidence by not asking for comment to explain how the Lewis gun was legal because of it was supplied by the MOD/RAF
  • Disclosure can also show that the Defendant avoids issues like the debate and consultations say how any Police have a duty to assess if a gun supplied by the MOD/RAF (which can easily be modified to fire) used by genuine enthusiasts or not. But SWP police knew that the Claimant had sold a Lewis Gun he received from the MOD/RAF to enthusiasts and a museum and so no reason whatsoever to believe the gun was re-commissioned to use as a weapon.   

New Evidence – Legal Advice needed on new evidence is emerging and the transcripts of the 2009 trial became available to people in 2019 who are starting to respond with information.

  • If the Defendant had been honest in prosecution documents and if the Defendant had not colluded with the writer of the 2009 medical reports in 2009 would not have been in prison
  • Now the Claimant is out of prison and not restricted in travel by licence conditions the Lewis Gun case transcripts from 2010 have become available to people the Claimant is learning more.
  • The Claimant needs time to put all this new evidence together and request the Directions of the Court so that the truth can be evidence at trial. 

Directions on additional Further and Better Particulars to include how the Defendant manipulated and used multi agencies to harm the Claimant  

  • In proving a case at Court and addressing accountability, establishing a trend is important to show it is not just a one-off problem.
  • For truth to be come evidence and to avoid issuing new proceedings with a messy duplicate civil trial the Claimant needs Legal advice on how to add the actions how the Defendant has manipulated multi agencies in 2009 onwards to the present moment and 2020, which of means also including the writer of the medical reports, and the Defendant’s lawyers conduct
  • It must be emphasised that the evidence that Dr XX (and so the Defendant and their lawyers) acted and still acts potentially criminally is very much more. What is said in this document is only a sample in order to be as brief as possible.
  • As can be seen by all this events and the have been too much for a lay Claimant to cope with such complex civil proceedings and he request the Court set new Directions so that he can manage and include all the new issues and evidence.

STATEMENT OF TRUTH

I believe that the facts stated in this application are true.

Maurice John Kirk BVSc

Date 21 January 2020

CASE NO:1CF03361

& D00CF279

IN THE CARDIFF COUNTY COURT

MAURICE JOHN KIRK

Claimant

and

CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES CONSTABULARY

Defendant

List of Documents in Support of the N244 Application 21 January 2020

  DATE     Name   Relevance
28 Aug 2009 NHS Radiology Brain Scan results. Two doctors at ABMU NHS confirm a normal all clear result.
30 Sept 2009 Dr XX reports to the Cardiff Crown Court Dr XX hides the above from the Court and totally makes up that this is brain damage.
19 Oct 2009 Extract of Dr XX final Opinion to Cardiff Crown Court  
16 June 2010 CAA Medical says Claimant is fit to fly Obviously Claimant Maurice Kirk does not appear mentally ill or brain damaged as Dr XX says.
28 Nov 2013 University Hospital of Wales (UHW) Cardiff Radiology at UHW gives a normal all clear brain scan 
14 March 2014 Dr Rose Marnell Clinical Director at HMP Cardiff Says no evidence of any brain damage or PDD/delusion.
25 July 2019 Belinda Kirk (Oxford educated TV/film maker daughter of Claimant) Writes regards the Defendant falsely saying the Claimant is a risk to her and her family when Belinda Kirk says that is not true. .
     
     
     
 
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Maurice Kirk: Covert Police Operation Challis to having me shot VIDEO – Machine-gun Conspiracy to have me Shot is now Proven – The Elephant In The Room – 28 Oct. 2020

from: https://mauricejohnkirk.com/

Covert Police Operation Challis to having me shot

Posted on October 28, 2020 by Maurice Kirk

Why didn’t the police simply not ring me up or drop round for a quiet chat to ask where my aircraft had gone to?Watch this space

The Elephant in the Room

On 24th June 2020 Detective Chief Inspector Stuart Mackenzie of the South Wales Police was dragged out of an early lucrative retirement, the reward for what the local Taffia had told him to do, have me arrested in the hope of my receiving a 10 year prison term.

Mackenzie was to sign yet another one of Adrian Oliver’s concocted witness statements. Oliver of Dolmans , solicitors, Cardiff, had drafted a retrospective account of Operations ‘Chalice’ and ‘Dandelion’ in 2009 to have me ‘lawfully shot’. If that had failed the back-up police cars, also surrounding our home in St Donats, were also waiting, up the lane, with a Vale of Glamorgan social services team to take our then 10 year old daughter, Genevieve, to be taken into ‘care’. Why? Because the clandestine MAPPA level 3 category 3 meeting three weeks earlier in Barry police station had registered me amongst the top 5% most dangerous in the UK!

Oliver had already fabricated an oh so similar witness statement for the then Chief Constable, in February 2009, for Ms Barbara Wilding to sign as a sworn truthful affidavit. This criminal act of deliberate non disclosure of evidence sparked an early retirement, also, to protect her pension despite the blatant deceit in having me gaoled so many times only to be latter acquitted. This is why, of course, these now 20 police files have taken 11 years to reach the surface despite a string of failed court orders.

Detective Superintendent Stuart Mackenzie Retrospective Statement 24th June 12020

They had all lied by putting together Wilding’s 25th February 2009 sworn affidavit, as these 20 odd files of sensitive police material so portray but, of course, taking the lid off the ‘can of worms’ in their ‘Trading in machine guns’ conspiracy, trial T20097445, when no defence needed to be tendered for an obviously predicted acquittal.

A Helpful Chronology for New Readers

The ‘Elephant in the Room’, no one was to mention, of course, was because their chief constable was, at the time, defending the now notorious BS614159 plus 2 civil damages claims following police having lost 40 odd malicious criminal prosecutions. My resultant civil damages claim required as many as 300 witnesses with 100 of which being police officers, serving and retired.

     
So, did no one in the South Wales Police simply have asked me, especially while visiting police stations after the 29th May 2009 decision by Mackenzie and MAPPA to have me arrested?

I will relish doing a second statement on how the culture of South Wales Police compels otherwise good officers to do obvious wrong on this occasion Officers are called off normal duties to answer a  “Get Kirk” fatwa. Tis corrupting cultire at SWp puits the public at risk and officers more senior than McKenzie would be involved:-  

The jury did not see these police at all believable or credible and here is spelling out each detail of why………

·        Critical – Who appointed McKenzie as SIO?

·        What was McKenzie actually to do because why such attention over a matter (couple of old cartridges with a dummy gun that if it could fire a single shot was too dangerous to actually use) is so simple a local constable could deal with by asking MK in for a chat and asking – ‘Where is this gun Sir?’  

·        Why does McKenzie say the policy decision of 29 May 2009 included ‘MK visiting HQ to arrest CC’ when that happened weeks later?  

·        If MK was to be a firearms risk …………why only with an era of gun too unsafe to fire? They show absolutely no interest in real risk of someone of MK’s clever ability going nuts and collecting real modern firearms   

Machine-gun Conspiracy to have me Shot is now Proven

BLOODY FOOLS

Why did not Mr plod simply ring me up to ask where my Farnborough Air show aircraft was now?

OR, OR ask me, while I attended the four police station visits, between 29th May and 22nd June 2009, complaining of their bullying, the time when police HQ had finally plucked up their yellow bellied courage to arrest me over three weeks later when they thought it was safe enough?

I refer, of course, to ‘Operation Chalice’ , 20 odd, some armed police, with helicopter simply to have me shot and if that failed put the bloody fear into my wife and child by using social workers, trying to take our 10 year old Genevieve into Vale of Glamorgan care?

  1. Amazing 20 South Wales Police arch-leaver Defence Files, unlawfully hidden for over 10 years, including from my 2010 ‘Trading in Machine criminal trial , carrying a mandatory 10 year prison term, were only disclosed to me last week but only by yet another court order

Case number 1CF03361

In The Cardiff County Court

Maurice John Kirk

Claimant

And

The Chief Constable of South Wales Constabulary

Defendant

DRAFT                  Two Million Pound Damages Claim                  1CF03361

Introduction

A Disclosure of 20 lever arch files from the Defendant was received for me at Cardiff County Court on 12 October 2020. Dolman, solicitors’ QC told the bemused Judge Beard, residing,  that Adrian Oliver, partner in Dolmans of Cardiff, that he was refusing to serve them on me in electronic form for fear his ‘busted flush’, that has earned his firm m illions of pounds, so far, since their unlawful harassment of me started in 1993 , defending successive chief constables from 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions. The nefarious conduct of his client would be all over the websites, he indicated, in a matter of minutes if disclosed electronically. This would reveal the extreme level of police bullying and criminal conduct by so that many other in positions of privilege would be also published world-wide. I refer, of course, to far too many within in the welsh judges, HM Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) welsh prison administration and HM Parole Service (Wales)

  • The 20 lever arch files start with the first 10 files covering the original prosecution papers from 2009/10. There are five files that are a defence statement by Stuart McKenzie SIO (Senior Investigating Officer) along with his attachments. There are  five files that are a defence statement and attachments by the Deputy SIO Suzanne Hughes.

The evidence missing from Disclosure include

Little mention of the armed 20 plus strong police Operation Chalice helicopter raid to snatch our then 10 year old daughter or having me shot.

  • The Disclosure only goes back to February 2009. When the prosecution charges for both offences are dated over a year earlier:-

“…..the particulars of the offence being that between the 1st day of January 2008 and the 23rd day of June 2009, ….”

  • I ask for both explanations as to why such an obvious if not highly improper approach to deny Disclosure.  
  • Also missing is…. to follow Coopers’, buyers of aircraft, with ‘gun’ detained for interrogation on 1968 firearms Act allegations of alleged offences contrary to law.

Where the Defendant fails to provide a defence or explanation

  • The Defendant give no defence or even an attempt to explain why they did not treat me as others and ask the CAA to contact me. I challenge the defendant to explain.
  • The police give no defence on anything. What was the point? There QC, Lloyd Jones had already told the court he had been informed from Judge Keiser Qc I was not going to be allowed a jury nor would the hearing of evidence take more than5 days!!!!
  • The police give no explanation as to why

Critical flaw in arguments

  • Mr Cooper purchased the gun from me in August 2008 and he and many others made various changes to the Lewis display gun in the 17 months from sale to trial.
  •  
  • Additionally, Suzanne Hughes is then faced with Mr Cooper’s solicitor contacted SWP to say Mr Cooper will say the gun has been tampered with.
  •  
  • Suzanne Hughes tries to counter the obvious need to stop the prosecution by saying Mr Scott will cast doubt on what Mr Cooper says as unreliable.
  •  
  • But if Police are using Mr Scot to discredit the reliability of Mr Cooper as a witness as to the condition of the Lewis display gun. Then police have absolutely no witnesses and absolutely no evidence as to what condition the Lewis display gun was at the point of sale and in my ownership before that.
  •  
  • It follows South Wales Police and Suzanne Hughes knew with certainty that there were no grounds to charge, remand and continue with a prosecution.
  •  
  • Additional questions I seek answered……. To follow with further publications of docs created during my pranks to further expose their inherent deceit.
  •  
  • This exposed criminal conduct is set out in these 20 odd now released police files with such things as the 20+ police strong armed helicopter raid on our home, in the Vale of G Glamorgan on the 22nd June 2009 in Operation Chalice are unlawfully omitted from files.

 Aim to have me arrested/shot while the other police raid, a few hours later, to snatch our then 10 year old daughter, Genevieve, also withheld from court ordered disclosure.

Also, no Nottinghamshire police criminal investigation disclosure, I had specifically asked for, in also detained Jerry and Jenny Cooper, the latter having collected the film prop from replica Battle of the Somme machine gun, many months before, police had plucked up the courage, for 27 senior police meetings in Barbara Wilding’s HQ, to press the action stations button. SUBSTANTIAL REWARDS FOR ANY INTERNAL INFORMATION from retired police…… maurice@kirkflyingvet.com tel 07708586202

A seven figure exemplary damages claim is due to come my way plus recovery of my huge costs in my defending this malicious criminal prosecution.

To be paid by the Chief Constable of South Wales Police Constabulary? No, in your dreams as Barbara Wilding, with her corrupt police officers, Adrian Oliver and others at Dolman’s, solicitors, Cardiff and other lying prosecution witnesses now face my prepared private criminal prosecutions.

The excessive perversion of justice, set out in these, until now, 20 police files, indicate a deliberately concocted plan stop my my numerous civil claims identifying welsh police’s 40 odd failed maliciously brought police criminal prosecutions,

PAY OUT TIME

All those who helped me be acquitted of all charges, requiring no rebuttal and while I was held in Cardiff prison for nearly 8 months, send in your details of costs.

Also a detailed statement on any aspect in the abuse of process of that shambolic two week highlighting any perverse issue you may have witnessed

Sky and another TV company have already expressed interest in a ‘documentary this usual and extreme level of deceit within senior staff of South Wales Police HQ in Bridgend.

contact me 24/7 on 07708586202 maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

The 20 police files will be published over the next few weeks to stimulate those who know anything about the CAA causing ‘gun’s on other British aircraft being frantically decommissioned

I will be handing out Cash, lots of Cash for info also on photos of My DH2 taken in august 2008 and August 2009 etc

WATCH THIS SPACE

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Archive [here] continues [from 2011]

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

#FreeAssange: The Guardian’s Silence Let UK Trample on Assange’s Rights + Protest “The Guardian’s Role” + “The War Logs” 10th Anniversary 21 Oct. 2020

 Update 21 Oct. 20: 

Marking 10 Years since the Iraq War  Logs

Consortium News VIDEO

———————————————————————————————————————–

The Guardian’s Silence Let UK Trample on Assange’s Rights in Effective Darkness

On the eve of a demonstration outside the paper’s office in London, Jonathan Cook issues a statement about The Guardian’s abandonment of its former media partner.

Assange supporters outside the Old Bailey courthouse in London at the start of the extradition trial of Julian Assange. (You Tube, AcTivism Munich still)

By Jonathan Cook
Jonathan-Cook.net

WISE Up, a solidarity group for Julian Assange and whistleblower Chelsea Manning, is due to stage ademonstrationoutside The Guardian offices on Oct. 22 to protest the paper’s failure to support Assange as the U.S. seeks his extradition in an unprecedented assault on press freedom.

The date chosen for the protest marks the 10th anniversary of The Guardian’s publication of the Iraq war logs, leaked by Manning to Assange and which lie at the heart of the U.S. case to reclassify journalism exposing crimes against humanity as “espionage.”

Here is my full statement, part of which is due to be read out, in support of Assange and castigating The Guardian for its craven failure to speak up in solidarity with its former media partner:  

Julian Assange has been hounded out of public life and public view by the U.K.  and U.S.  governments for the best part of a decade.

Now he languishes in a small, airless cell in Belmarsh high-security prison in London — a victim of arbitrary detention, according to a UN working group, and a victim of psychological torture, according to Nils Melzer, the UN’s expert on torture.

If Judge Vanessa Baraitser, presiding in the Central Criminal Court in London, agrees to extradition, as she gives every appearance of preparing to do, Assange will be the first journalist to face a terrifying new ordeal — a form of extraordinary rendition to the United States for “espionage” — for having the courage to publish documents that exposed U.S.  war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The Guardian worked with Assange and WikiLeaks on vitally important documents – now at the heart of the U.S.  case against Assange – known as the Afghanistan and Iraq war logs. The latter were published exactly a decade ago today. They were a journalistic coup of global significance, and the paper ought to be profoundly proud of its role in bringing them to public attention.

Protest Call Out! Thursday 22/10/20 at 12 noon The Guardian’s Role in the Persecution and Prosecution of Julian #Assange https://t.co/OJhq1ElaLW

— Emmy Butlin (@greekemmy) October 20, 2020

During Assange’s extradition hearing, however, The Guardian treated the logs and its past association with Assange and WikiLeaks more like a dirty secret it hoped to keep out of sight. Those scoops furnished by Assange and whistleblower Chelsea Manning enriched the paper financially, and bolstered its standing internationally. They also helped to pave its path into the lucrative U.S.  market.

Unlike Assange and Manning, The Guardian has suffered no consequences for publishing the logs. Unlike Assange and Manning, the paper has faced no retribution. While it profited, Assange continues to be made an example of — to deter other journalists from contemplating following in his footsteps.

The Guardian owes Assange.It owes him a huge debt for allowing it to share in the journalistic glory of WikiLeaks’ revelations.

It owes him a duty of care as its partner in publishing the logs.

It owes him its voice loudly denouncing the abuse of a fellow journalist for doing the essence of journalism — holding the powerful to account.

It owes him and its own staff, and the young journalists who will one day take their place, its muscle in vigorously defending the principle of a strong and free press.

It owes him, and the rest of us, a clear profession of its outrage as the U.S. conducts an unprecedented assault on free speech, the foundation of a democratic society.

And yet The Guardian has barely raised its voice above a whisper as the noose has tightened around Assange’s — and by extension, our — neck. It has barely bothered to cover the dramatic and deeply disturbing developments of last month’s extradition hearing, or the blatant abuses of legal process overseen by Baraitser.

The Guardian has failed to raise its editorial voice in condemnation either of the patently dishonest U.S.  case for extradition or of the undisguised mistreatment of Assange by Britain’s legal and judicial authorities.

Aerial view of HM Prison Belmarsh. (Kleon3, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons)

The paper’s many columnists ignored the proceedings too, except for those who contributed yet more snide and personal attacks of the kind that have typified The Guardian’s coverage of Assange for many years.

It is not too late for the paper to act in defence of Assange and journalism.

Assange’s rights are being trampled under foot close by The Guardian’s offices in London because the British establishment knows that these abuses are taking place effectively in darkness. It has nothing to fear as long as the media abdicates its responsibility to scrutinize what amounts to the biggest attack on journalism in living memory.

Were The Guardian to shine a light on Assange’s case — as it is morally obligated to do — the pressure would build on other media organizations, not least the BBC, to do their job properly too. The British establishment would finally face a countervailing pressure to the one being exerted so forcefully by the U.S.

The Guardian should have stood up for Assange long ago, when the threats he and investigative journalism faced became unmistakable. It missed that opportunity. But the threats to Assange — and the causes of transparency and accountability he champions — have not gone away. They have only intensified. Assange needs the Guardian’s support more urgently, more desperately than ever before.

Jonathan Cook is a former Guardian journalist (1994-2001) and winner of the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism. He is a freelance journalist based in Nazareth. If you appreciate his articles, please consider offering your financial support.

This article is from his blog Jonathan Cook.net.

The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.

Please Contribute to Consortium News

Donate securely with

Click on ‘Return to PayPal’ here

Or securely by credit card or check by clicking the red button:

sourcehttps://consortiumnews.com/2020/10/21/the-guardians-silence-let-uk-trample-on-assanges-rights-in-effective-darkness/

related:

Update 21/10/2020: #Twitterstorm Commemorating the #WikiLeaks #IraqWarLogs 10th publication Anniversary

https://wiseupaction.info/2020/10/21/twitterstorm-commemorating-the-wikileaks-iraqwarlogs-10th-publication-anniversary/

———————————————————————————–

Protest Call Out! Thursday 22/10/20 at 12 noon The Guardian’s Role in the Persecution and Prosecution of Julian #Assange

Posted on October 20, 2020 by greekemmy

Please join us in calling out The Guardian for its role in the persecution and prosecution of Julian Assange publisher of WikiLeaks on 22/10/20, on the day of the 10th Anniversary of the Iraq War Logs. We shall hold a small peaceful socially distancing demonstration in accordance to our covid risk assessment. We’ll wave banners, posters, distribute flyers, read out satements of support and give speeches take videos and later on go flyering in the vicinity. Here is a copy of our  Guardian leaflet Oct 2020 front (1) and Guardian leaflet Oct 2020 back (1) if you wish to download and distribute in your neighbourhood of place of work. It’s written by JADC’s Maxine Walker. read it below!

The Guardian’s Role in the Persecution and Prosecution of Julian Assange – A Disgrace to Journalism and a Mortal Danger to a Free Press

By Maxine Walker

Julian Assange is responsible for publishing the most massive and important leaks of US government documents showing the reality of its (and UK/NATO partners) wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.  These 2010 leaks created a tidal wave of disgust at the revelations of war crimes, corruption, torture, rendition and death squads. The US/UK were determined to annihilate Assange and ensure that such exposure would never happen again.

Consequently, today Julian Assange, a journalist and publisher, sits, silenced in Belmarsh Maximum Security prison, awaiting a ruling on his extradition to the USA on charges of espionage carrying a 175-year sentence. He is a victim of years of ‘arbitrary detention’ and psychological torture according to UN organisations and experts.

A journalist and publisher charged with espionage for publishing the truth? Surely you would expect other journalists – seeing the danger to honest journalism – to rally to his defense. Especially the Guardian which claims to stand for liberal values and benefited greatly by collaborating with Assange and WikiLeaks on publishing the Afghan and Iraq material.

Think Again. They did the Opposite.

The oh so liberal Guardian has in fact taken the lead media role for the past 8 years in smearing, lying about and ridiculing Julian Assange. More than any other media outlet, it has shaped and weaponised mainstream liberal opinion into an Anti-Assange lobby.  By doing this the Guardian has given enormous support to a massively well-resourced US/UK campaign to ‘Get Assange’ and has helped to pave the way for his imprisonment in the USA.

Cartoon by Oisele

Since 2012 they have printed a stream of half-truths, outright lies and smears accusing Assange of being variously:  A Russian agent and Putin Ally – PROVABLY FALSE A Trump supporter – PROVABLY FALSE A narcissist/Egotist/ A bail absconder/an outlaw – PROVABLY FALSE

The Guardian has ignored repeated violations of his human and legal rights.  They have shown not a flicker of curiosity about his prison conditions (effectively solitary confinement); his psychological torture; his court cases (he appears in court in a glass box as though a dangerous prisoner)  or about US intelligence agencies extraordinary and illegal surveillance of Assange (24-hour video and audio recordings of his meetings with lawyers, doctors, journalists etc)  in the Ecuadorian Embassy. Instead they have waged warfare against Julian Assange.

Guardian gutter journalism- No smear too low

The following is a  just a small proportion of the Guardians gutter journalism: In 2015 the UN Working Group Arbitrary Detention (a body of eminent lawyers and experts) ruled that Julian Assange had been arbitrarily detained since 2012, a ruling made against enormous pressure from the US and UK governments. The Guardian’s Marina Hyde (who later called Assange “the biggest arsehole in Knightsbridge”) taking the Government line wrote:” I don’t want to go out on too much of a limb here, but my sense is that the finest legal minds are not drawn to UN panels as a career path. … Perhaps UN panellists are like UN goodwill ambassadors, and even Geri Halliwell could be one. …” She was happy to torch not only  Assange’s rights but also the last hope of those illegally detained by repressive governments.

After the Ecuadorian and UK governments illegally breached Assange’s asylum and dragged him out Ecuadorian Embassy in 2019, the Guardian’s Hadley Freeman wrote mockingly: “I love stories about badly behaved houseguests and Julian Assange has raised the bar” followed by her recycling of the most insulting and unfounded insults about his behaviour.

In 2018 Luke Harding and other Guardian writers began a concerted campaign to link Assange with the Kremlin. Offering no evidence whatsoever, Harding and others simply increasingly referred to his ‘ties to the Kremlin.”  Kathleen Hall Jamieson asserted that “it now clearer than ever” that “the Russian cyber-theft” of thousands of Democratic Party emails was “abetted by Assange’s WikiLeaks”  Harding and others wrote the fictional: ‘Revealed: Russia’s secret plan to help Julian Assange escape from UK.’  Finally, Harding invented an entire episode in which he claimed that former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort had held three secret talks with Assange in the Ecuadorian Embassy.  This was strenuously denied by all and, given that the Embassy was amongst the most surveilled building in London, evidence would have existed. Any functional journalist would have known these stories were intelligence plants designed, as we now see, as part of the softening up process for Julian Assange’s 2019 ejection from the Embassy and current Extradition proceedings against him.

Most recently the Guardian has barely covered his Extradition hearing at the Old Bailey nor the enormous threat to press freedom represented by his case. They covered Jonny Depp’s court case more.

The Guardian has lied so much it is now part of the US Prosecution case

The US Extradition case against Assange is wholly politically motivated but the US Prosecutors have to pretend crimes have been committed by Julian Assange. One of their accusations is that Assange risked lives and caused harm by failing to redact names.  At the Old Bailey they repeatedly quoted from a book about WikiLeaks authored by Guardian journalists, David Leigh and Luke Harding which claims that Assange was recklessly indifferent to the safety of US informants named in leaked files. This not true. Serious journalists who had worked with Assange on the leaks testified at the Old Bailey that Assange was scrupulous about risk minimisation and redaction.  The Leigh/Harding book also, unforgivably revealed a complex password entrusted to Leigh by Assange that provided access to an online cache of unredacted documents.  Assange is now in the dock for this and still the Guardian continues to lie.

If a plane takes off from the UK with Assange shackled on board destined for life in a US supermax prison – the Guardian will bear a large part of the blame.

Free Julian Assange

Dump the Guardian

source: https://wiseupaction.info/2020/10/20/protest-call-out-thursday-22-10-20-at-12-noon-the-guardians-role-in-the-persecution-and-prosecution-of-julian-assange/

Share this!

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

#FreeAssange: Protest Call Out! Thursday 22/10/20 at 12 noon The Guardian’s Role in the Persecution and Prosecution of Julian Assange + #Twitterstorm! 21 Oct. 2020

Update 21/10/2020: #Twitterstorm Commemorating the #WikiLeaks #IraqWarLogs 10th publication Anniversary

https://wiseupaction.info/2020/10/21/twitterstorm-commemorating-the-wikileaks-iraqwarlogs-10th-publication-anniversary/

———————————————————————————–

Protest Call Out! Thursday 22/10/20 at 12 noon The Guardian’s Role in the Persecution and Prosecution of Julian #Assange

Please join us in calling out The Guardian for its role in the persecution and prosecution of Julian Assange publisher of WikiLeaks on 22/10/20, on the day of the 10th Anniversary of the Iraq War Logs. We shall hold a small peaceful socially distancing demonstration in accordance to our covid risk assessment. We’ll wave banners, posters, distribute flyers, read out satements of support and give speeches take videos and later on go flyering in the vicinity. Here is a copy of our  Guardian leaflet Oct 2020 front (1) and Guardian leaflet Oct 2020 back (1) if you wish to download and distribute in your neighbourhood of place of work. It’s written by JADC’s Maxine Walker. read it below!

The Guardian’s Role in the Persecution and Prosecution of Julian Assange – A Disgrace to Journalism and a Mortal Danger to a Free Press

By Maxine Walker

Julian Assange is responsible for publishing the most massive and important leaks of US government documents showing the reality of its (and UK/NATO partners) wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.  These 2010 leaks created a tidal wave of disgust at the revelations of war crimes, corruption, torture, rendition and death squads. The US/UK were determined to annihilate Assange and ensure that such exposure would never happen again.

Consequently, today Julian Assange, a journalist and publisher, sits, silenced in Belmarsh Maximum Security prison, awaiting a ruling on his extradition to the USA on charges of espionage carrying a 175-year sentence. He is a victim of years of ‘arbitrary detention’ and psychological torture according to UN organisations and experts.

A journalist and publisher charged with espionage for publishing the truth? Surely you would expect other journalists – seeing the danger to honest journalism – to rally to his defense. Especially the Guardian which claims to stand for liberal values and benefited greatly by collaborating with Assange and WikiLeaks on publishing the Afghan and Iraq material.

Think Again. They did the Opposite.

The oh so liberal Guardian has in fact taken the lead media role for the past 8 years in smearing, lying about and ridiculing Julian Assange. More than any other media outlet, it has shaped and weaponised mainstream liberal opinion into an Anti-Assange lobby.  By doing this the Guardian has given enormous support to a massively well-resourced US/UK campaign to ‘Get Assange’ and has helped to pave the way for his imprisonment in the USA.

Cartoon by Oisele

Since 2012 they have printed a stream of half-truths, outright lies and smears accusing Assange of being variously:  A Russian agent and Putin Ally – PROVABLY FALSE A Trump supporter – PROVABLY FALSE A narcissist/Egotist/ A bail absconder/an outlaw – PROVABLY FALSE

The Guardian has ignored repeated violations of his human and legal rights.  They have shown not a flicker of curiosity about his prison conditions (effectively solitary confinement); his psychological torture; his court cases (he appears in court in a glass box as though a dangerous prisoner)  or about US intelligence agencies extraordinary and illegal surveillance of Assange (24-hour video and audio recordings of his meetings with lawyers, doctors, journalists etc)  in the Ecuadorian Embassy. Instead they have waged warfare against Julian Assange.

Guardian gutter journalism- No smear too low

The following is a  just a small proportion of the Guardians gutter journalism: In 2015 the UN Working Group Arbitrary Detention (a body of eminent lawyers and experts) ruled that Julian Assange had been arbitrarily detained since 2012, a ruling made against enormous pressure from the US and UK governments. The Guardian’s Marina Hyde (who later called Assange “the biggest arsehole in Knightsbridge”) taking the Government line wrote:” I don’t want to go out on too much of a limb here, but my sense is that the finest legal minds are not drawn to UN panels as a career path. … Perhaps UN panellists are like UN goodwill ambassadors, and even Geri Halliwell could be one. …” She was happy to torch not only  Assange’s rights but also the last hope of those illegally detained by repressive governments.

After the Ecuadorian and UK governments illegally breached Assange’s asylum and dragged him out Ecuadorian Embassy in 2019, the Guardian’s Hadley Freeman wrote mockingly: “I love stories about badly behaved houseguests and Julian Assange has raised the bar” followed by her recycling of the most insulting and unfounded insults about his behaviour.

In 2018 Luke Harding and other Guardian writers began a concerted campaign to link Assange with the Kremlin. Offering no evidence whatsoever, Harding and others simply increasingly referred to his ‘ties to the Kremlin.”  Kathleen Hall Jamieson asserted that “it now clearer than ever” that “the Russian cyber-theft” of thousands of Democratic Party emails was “abetted by Assange’s WikiLeaks”  Harding and others wrote the fictional: ‘Revealed: Russia’s secret plan to help Julian Assange escape from UK.’  Finally, Harding invented an entire episode in which he claimed that former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort had held three secret talks with Assange in the Ecuadorian Embassy.  This was strenuously denied by all and, given that the Embassy was amongst the most surveilled building in London, evidence would have existed. Any functional journalist would have known these stories were intelligence plants designed, as we now see, as part of the softening up process for Julian Assange’s 2019 ejection from the Embassy and current Extradition proceedings against him.

Most recently the Guardian has barely covered his Extradition hearing at the Old Bailey nor the enormous threat to press freedom represented by his case. They covered Jonny Depp’s court case more.

The Guardian has lied so much it is now part of the US Prosecution case

The US Extradition case against Assange is wholly politically motivated but the US Prosecutors have to pretend crimes have been committed by Julian Assange. One of their accusations is that Assange risked lives and caused harm by failing to redact names.  At the Old Bailey they repeatedly quoted from a book about WikiLeaks authored by Guardian journalists, David Leigh and Luke Harding which claims that Assange was recklessly indifferent to the safety of US informants named in leaked files. This not true. Serious journalists who had worked with Assange on the leaks testified at the Old Bailey that Assange was scrupulous about risk minimisation and redaction.  The Leigh/Harding book also, unforgivably revealed a complex password entrusted to Leigh by Assange that provided access to an online cache of unredacted documents.  Assange is now in the dock for this and still the Guardian continues to lie.

If a plane takes off from the UK with Assange shackled on board destined for life in a US supermax prison – the Guardian will bear a large part of the blame.

Free Julian Assange

Dump the Guardian

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Maurice Kirk: Alun Cairns MP to Rescue his Police Stopped Prison Letters? + archive 19 Oct. 2020 VIDEO

Alun Cairns MP to Rescue his Police Stopped Prison Letters?

Dear Mr Driscoll, 19th September 2020

Maurice served the ‘Gulag Card’ again

I have been very reluctant, obviously, to further involve my Vale of Glamorgan elected member to the House for nearly a decade but it can no longer be avoided.

Some of the withheld letters from my sister and John Graham by G4S/police until my day of violent eviction on1st November 2019 from HMP Parc. The letters related to the legal action against G4S and South Wales Police, year in year out, blocking my essential daily medications for my carcinogenic advanced Barrett’s syndrome in my gullet.


This week, after the 4th insulting demand, I attended HM Crown Court where, despite CPS barrister promises each time to disclose, your South Wales Police continue to pervert the course of justice by denying me a copy of those letters I sent to you but were stopped without my knowledge at the time in both Cardiff and Parc prisons.

This G4S letter was only written after I had published world-wide my damages claim.

This was while I was in Cardiff prison in 2019 for a ‘breach of a restraining order’ never served on me in the first place, as with the previous 2011 nonsense, in order to avoid the embarrassment of an appeal or ‘variation’ that would disclose the truth about my Caswell Clinic falsified medical records that has done so much harm to my family.

On 1st November 2019 eight G4S prison officers seriously assaulted me on ejecting me from my prison cell with handcuffs behind my back. This was purely to seize my 1CF03361 ‘trading in machine-gun’ civil claim papers with an imminent jury trial, incidentally, against the South Wales Police, the defendant in yet another concocted 40odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions. This leaves my stolen property still under welsh authority ‘control’ that successive organisations, I have contacted, have failed to recover on my behalf.

Why, because, apart from the one million pound plus damages claim against the South Wales Police there is my £5000,000 claim against G4S for being a party to serious perversion of justice and bullying, within the prison walls, due to fabricated convictions now dreamed up including, ‘firearms, narcotics, ABH, FTA and ‘child abuse’!

John Graham Esq, who has often complained to my then MP, was another injured party in whose letters, both in and out of the two prisons, were purloined, delayed or destroyed by an array of welsh authorities, with the Chief Constable being the ‘nigger in the wood-pile’ each time. Mr Graham even attended Exeter Crown court, this week, to address the presiding judge, HHJ Rose, for not having his letters either returned or offered any explanation at all!

The way forward to simplify the future, I suggest, is for your office to supply me with copies of any of my letters that managed to filter through my MAPPA 3/3 censored prison communications in the past 10 years.

Any expense or Conservative Party donation suggested, for the work needed, then I am only too willing to oblige.

Thankyou

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Tel 07708586202

http://www.kirkflyingvet.com
mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com
maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

sourcehttps://mauricejohnkirk.com/2020/09/19/alun-cairns-mp-to-maurices-rescue/

—————————————————————————————————

Unlawful Welsh Induced Ankle Tag

14 Aug. 2020 

 I am detained in Bridgwater Police Station due to the Taffia requesting the Avon and Sonerset Police put the proverbial ‘boot in’. Both my cars are confiscated stating I have no driving licence, no insurance or even a driving licence!

 


‘Trading in Machine Guns’ SWP Conspiracy Celibrations

mauricekirk  12 Oct 2020
 
I have just finished my 25 page 4th witness statement for a million pound damages claim as the Welsh police keep confiscating them for fear of media attention . Why, the proven near three decades of South Wales Authoriries flagrant dishonesty following the 2010 CARDIFF CROWN COURT acquittal requiring no defence evidence
 

see more:

Archive continues [from 2011]

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Maurice Kirk: Undelivered letters from prison: contd. + “Abuse of Process Applications to Cardiff Courts” 18 Oct. 2020

As shown in previous posts, much mail was refused from being sent to recipients by the prison, written by Maurice Kirk whilst he was resident in it – even important recorded delivery mail to the Royal Courts of Justice, which had to be paid for by Maurice, were kept back and not sent. Completely illegal. Also, mail was not received by Maurice either – below are pic of just some of those letters [often with stamps] which were refused from being given to him, with more.

Lawyer’s secretary’s letter with dozen 1st Class for prisoner stopped by Welsh prison

 

Archive continues [from 2011]

related:

from:

Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police” https://www.mauricejohnkirk.com

Abuse of Process Applications to Cardiff Courts

I have had delivered to Cardiff County Court my 25 page personal witness statement carefully written, for my readers from around the world, to simply reveal the multi thousands of UK’s funds simply to have me gaoled for a minimum 10 years, anything, just anything, to stop my million pound damages claim against the South Wales Police

the cause

for their 40 odd lost malicious criminal prosecutions case number, now blocked for an appeal , BS614159 plus 8

BUT THAT IS NOT WHY I enclose this early draft for RCJ on how disgusting the welsh penal system is- but who gives a dam other than those incarcerated ?

Exeter Crown court, shortly, will hear the outcome of John Graham’s prison stopped letters, a courtdisturbance to warrant the complainant being gaoled

As usual I buy all who attend a very good lunch, paid for in advance owing to the unusual ciecumstances all generated by the south Wales Police, chief senior prosecutor NS Evans Esq and His Honour Judge Di Evens not stopping this wicked situation from contimuing.

But, of course, the dreaded Covid 19 is endangering each of the above’s incomes with 5000 Crown court trials, is it, put on ‘hold’ so , of course they must boost their respective pensions by dragging on any futile case they can generate or however absurd and bizarre South Wales Police case they can throw at their ‘gravy train’ system.

WHY, for promotion as CPS Richard Thomlow had decided to quickly become a judge for criminally pursuing myT20097447 ‘machine gun’ criminal prosecution. Just as DC Hughes, female police officer that had sneaked into each day of my machine gun criminal trial despite, as prosecution witness, reporting evidence on oath, each day , as promised promotion which she promptly GOT!

JOHN GRAHAM, also a prosecution witness, has since tried to obtain return of his stolen communications with me, by Cardiff and Parc, Bridgend welsh prisons.

26 September 2020

REQUEST FOR AN INTERNAL REVIEW

Dear Mr. Jukes,

Creator of my inspiration to expose just ‘what really goes on in our law Courts’

Seeing as I am denied my F.O.I.A. [S.A.R.]  / Data Protection Act request sent already [and attached to this message] to yourself, and after receiving the letter below [attached also] from a Mr. Jason Jenkins, a “Disclosure Officer” of S. Wales police I hereby ask for a formal internal review regarding the denial of my request.

It is believed the S. Wales police force does have the letter referred to in my request as Mr. Kirk was criminally charged and remanded in custody connected to the letter addressed to myself [amongst others] written by Mr. Kirk whilst previously resident in prison earlier in 2019, the letter allegedly having allegedly a possibly noxious “white substance” on it. This letter was stopped from being sent to myself by prison authorities / police at the time. The criminal charge of the letter which was attempted to be sent to myself has subsequently been dropped by the CPS.

I have already sent 3 forms of ID pertaining to myself after your request for ID.

For your information, the addition / amendment not sent with my written request, which was sent to Mr. Jukes at the S Wales police HQ at Cowbridge Rd. via recorded delivery R. Mail, is:

” Sent: 18 September 2020 10:59
To: matt.jukes@south-wales.pnn.police.uk <matt.jukes@south-wales.pnn.police.uk>
Subject: F.A.O.: Chief Constable Mr. M. Jukes, S. Wales police – Update to my F.O.I.A. / Data Protection Act / S.A.R. request

TO: Chief Constable of S. Wales police: Mr. M. Jukes, Police HQ., Cowbridge Rd., Bridgend, S. Wales,  CF31 3SU

FROM:  Mr. J. G. Graham

18 September 2020

UPDATE TO MY F.O.I.A. / D.P.A. Request to the Chief Constable Mr. M. Jukes, dated and sent 17 Sept. 2020:

Dear Mr. Jukes, Chief Constable of S. Wales police:

Please refer to my F.O.I.A. request to you, sent via R. Mail and also attached to this message. I apologise for leaving out an important part of my FOIA / Data Protection Act / S.A.R. request to you – that is:

Mr. Maurice Kirk [d.o.b. 12/03/1945, Somerset, UK]  was charged by the police in mid-2020 with:

” attempting to send a substance which caused distress to another [approx. May 2019] – the letter was stopped from leaving the prison last May 2019″

Mr. Kirk was in prison at the time of sending this letter, it being addressed to myself prior to it being stopped from leaving the prison, by authorities. This charge to Mr. Kirk was subsequently dropped in approximately June 2020.

My FOIA requests asks for a copy of this letter which was stopped as it had an alleged “substance” on it which might [qu.] “caused distress to another” [unqu.] – as it obviously exists as Mr. Kirk was charged with attempting to send it to myself. I request any other letters pertaining to myself that were not sent to me from either HMP Parc or HMP Cardiff from Mr. Kirk, during the times Mr. Kirk was resident in either of these prisons, whether they had any alleged “substances” on them or not.

The letter relating to the charge that was dropped for Mr. Kirk was referred to in part by the S. Wales police officer who wrote by email to myself – a copy of that email dated 06th July 2020 from officer “Brynsley Richards” of S. Wales police being sent with my 1st and original FOIA request letter to you sent on the 17 September 2020 via Royal Mail Recorded Delivery 1st class.  My F.O.I.A. request and attachment is attached to this email.

Thank you.

signed:  J. Graham

…………………………………

Posted in Uncategorized | 28 Comments

South Wales Police Machine Gun Conspiracy, to have me Shot, again in court on 12thc October 2020 – I am buying lunch

An early draft of my laboriously explaining, I am afraid, on how high ranking welsh police in the Vale of Glamorgan, due to their pensions now being at real a serious risk, (by locking me up for 5 years) had fabricated for me a MAPPA level 3 category 3 registration in order to stop my civil claim and if possible, having me shot in front of my wife, Kirsty and Daughter, Genevieve…. Oh yes, and who is next?

Fabricated following their having lost over 40 malicious criminal prosecutions while having my name removed from the veterinary register, on welsh police say so, using the remaining 11% from some 113 criminal allegations within nine years.

This machine -gun civil claim ,on Monday 12th Oct 3030 should be quite interesting in Cardiff’s Cardiff’s so called Civil Justice Centre

Hear is an earlier rough draft of about half of my my personal statement simply setting out exploring their deceit in some greater detail

Legal

This below Caswell Clinic fabricated data of Glanrhyd Hospital, Bridgend, was used in a secret Cardiff Crown Court hearing where I was unlawfully denied access when not even legally represented.

All while the fabricators of their chief constable’s machine-gun conspiracy are laughing all the way to the bank.

PLEASE READ WHAT HAD ME GAOLED FOR FIVE YEARS AND DESTROYED MY FAMILY

36.1 have been asked to give my mind to the issue as to whether or not Maurice Kirk is fit to plead and stand trial. Maurice Kirk clearly understands the nature of the charge and the significance of his plea. However, due to Maurice Kirk’s mental disorder described above, specifically his brain damage and its relationship to self-awareness, judgement, decision making, self-regulation of behaviour and control of emotions, combined with difficulty organising and sequencing information, his inability to filter out relevant information and his ‘ problems with attention and concentration, his overwhelming perception of himself as being a victim of persecution by the system, all of which are clearly evident in discussions with him concerning the alleged offence, he appears unable to address a specific legal and technical area of law necessary to appropriately conduct his defence.

37. Should Maurice Kirk be legally represented in court I would consider him fit to stand trial as a legal representation would be able to focus on the relevant matters.

38. Maurice Kirk’s current clinical presentation is clearly causing major problems for the Criminal Justice System, though is not of a nature and degree to warrant compulsory treatment. He would, however, benefit from continued contact with Mental Health Services to both monitor his condition and attempt to establish a relationship which would allow other treatment avenues to be explored.

39.1 I am aware that my opinion will cause significant difficulty for the court. I am also aware of the difficulties the court has had gaining further psychiatric evidence which to a degree is due to Maurice Kirk’s perceived ability to intimidate and threaten those who become involved in his case. Should Maurice Kirk require in-patient hospital treatment, I have concerns that a Medium Secure Unit would not be able to provide the degree of procedural security necessary to maintain the safety of its staff the confidentiality of other patients and the necessary security. Should the court wish a second opinion, they may wish to consider instructing a psychiatrist from a High Secure Hospital to assess Maurice Kirk both as to treatment and the environment in which that treatment should take place. I stress that the requirement for conditions of Special Security are purely as a result of Maurice Kirk’s communication with and encouragement of others, rather than his clinical presentation.

40. Maurice Kirk can return to court for any disposal that the court sees fit

ALL LIES OBTAINED UNDER BARBARA WILDING BLACKMAIL

……………………………………

Posted in Fair Trial, Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Another MP Bitten by Blair’s Wicked 1997 Harassment Act

Claudia Webbe arriving at a Labour Party meeting to finalise the Party's 2019 General Election manifesto

Patrick Cullinane Esq, Sir Norm Scarth RN, WW2 Arctic convoy survivor and Dame Sabine Macneill of email fame I hope you are all ‘sitting comfortably’ and I will begin…what I am about to ‘publish and be damned’

BOYS & GIRLS

We now have a spokeswomen in The House to get this thoroughly badly drafted evil Act to be chopped up, burnt at the stake, hung , drawn and quartered and even rescinded

Labour MP Claudia Webbe has been charged with harassing a woman.

Ms Webbe, who represents Leicester East, is accused of one count of harassment between September 2018 and April this year.The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said the 55-year-old MP is due to appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on 11 November.

Ms Webbe has said she is “innocent of any wrongdoing” and that she will “vigorously” defend herself in court.Labour has suspended Ms Webbe from the party and the party whip following the harassment charge, the BBC’s political editor Laura Kuenssberg understands.A Labour Party spokesperson said: “It would not be appropriate to comment on an ongoing case.

“Jenny Hopkins, from the CPS, said: “The CPS has today decided that Claudia Webbe, MP for Leicester East, should be charged with an offence of harassment against one female.”The CPS made the decision after receiving a file of evidence from the Metropolitan Police.

“Ms Webbe was elected as an MP in December’s general election, taking over the seat previously held by Keith Vaz.She remains a councillor in Islington, north London, since 2010, and was also a member of Labour’s National Executive Committee.Earlier in her career she acted as an adviser to Ken Livingstone when he was Mayor of London.

Patrick Cullinane Esq suffered an early death due to this wicked Act

Sir Norman had to early exile to Southern Ireland for fear of his life at 90 odd

Dame Sabine of email creation at Cerne laboratories had a ridiculously harsh 7 year prison term while I was let off with only a mere 5 years in the stench of welsh prisons.

As with the others named above, simply for publishing the truth a concept in life, incidentally, difficult to comprehend by those in authority where I once struggled for decades, South Wales, simply trying to practice veterinary surgery and bring up 1st and 2nd families without fear of reprisals.

I definitely GOT that bit wrong. South Wales has a climate tainted by deceit a concept in life, incidentally, where truth’ for them is difficult to comprehend.

I WILL HELP FUND THE STARTING OF A CAMPAIGN TO RID MY COUNTRY OF THIS MODERN EQUIVALENT OF THE 60s ‘SUS’ LAW simply for the POLICE TO LOCK AWAY THOSE WHOSE WHO ARE SIMPLY TELLING THE TRUTH

To:  Chief Constable of S. Wales police: Mr. M. Jukes, Police HQ., Cowbridge Rd., Bridgend, S. Wales CF31 3SU

26 September 2020

REQUEST FOR AN INTERNAL REVIEW

Dear Mr. Jukes,


REQUEST FOR INTERNAL REVIEW

Seeing as I am denied my F.O.I.A. [S.A.R.]  / Data Protection Act request sent already [and attached to this message] to yourself, and after receiving the letter below [attached also] from a Mr. Jason Jenkins, a “Disclosure Officer” of S. Wales police I hereby ask for a formal internal review regarding the denial of my request.

It is believed the S. Wales police force does have the letter referred to in my request as Mr. Kirk was criminally charged and remanded in custody connected to the letter addressed to myself written by Mr. Kirk whilst previously resident in prison earlier in 2019, the letter allegedly having allegedly a possibly noxious “white substance” on it. This letter was stopped from being sent to myself by prison authorities / police at the time. The criminal charge of the letter which was attempted to be sent to myself has subsequently been dropped by the CPS.

I have already sent 3 forms of ID pertaining to myself after your request for ID.

For your information, the addition / amendment not sent with my written request, which was sent to Mr. Jukes at the S Wales police HQ at Cowbridge Rd. via recorded delivery R. Mail, is:

“Sent: 18 September 2020 10:59
To: matt.jukes@south-wales.pnn.police.uk <matt.jukes@south-wales.pnn.police.uk>
Subject: F.A.O.: Chief Constable Mr. M. Jukes, S. Wales police – Update to my F.O.I.A. / Data Protection Act / S.A.R. request

TO: Chief Constable of S. Wales police: Mr. M. Jukes, Police HQ., Cowbridge Rd., Bridgend, S. Wales,  CF31 3SU

18 September 2020

UPDATE TO MY F.O.I.A. / D.P.A. Request to the Chief Constable Mr. M. Jukes, dated and sent 17 Sept. 2020:

Dear Mr. Jukes, Chief Constable of S. Wales police:

Please refer to my F.O.I.A. request to you, sent via R. Mail and also attached to this message. I apologise for leaving out an important part of my FOIA / Data Protection Act / S.A.R. request to you – that is:

Mr. Maurice Kirk [d.o.b. 12/03/1945 Taunton, Somerset, UK was charged by the police in mid-2020 with:

“attempting to send a substance which caused distress to another [approx. May 2019] – the letter was stopped from leaving the prison last May 2019”

Mr. Kirk was in prison at the time of sending this letter it being addressed to myself prior to it being stopped from leaving the prison, by authorities. This charge to Mr. Kirk was subsequently dropped in June 2020.

My FOIA requests asks for a copy of this letter which was stopped as it had an alleged “substance” on it which might [qu.] “caused distress to another” [unqu.] – as it obviously exists as Mr. Kirk was charged with attempting to send it to myself. I request any other letters pertaining to myself that were not sent to me from either HMP Parc or HMP Cardiff from Mr. Kirk, during the times Mr. Kirk was resident in either of these prisons, whether they had any alleged “substances” on them or not.

The letter relating to the charge that was dropped for Mr. Kirk was referred to in part by the S. Wales police officer who wrote by email to myself – a copy of that email dated 06th July 2020 from officer “Brynsley Richards” of S. Wales police being sent with my 1st and original FOIA request letter to you sent on the 17 September 2020 via Royal Mail Recorded Delivery 1st class.  My F.O.I.A. request and attachment is attached to this email.

Thank you

signed:  J. Graham

4 Attachments

Thankyou

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Tel 07708586202

http://www.kirkflyingvet.com
mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com
maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

………………………………………

Archive continues [from 2011]

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment