MAURICE KIRK: OUTRAGEOUS: STILL DENIED VITAL MEDICATIONS AND HOSPITAL APPOINTMENTS AND MORE IN HMP PARC + archive 06 Feb. 2018

Maurice Kirk is serving a 2 year sentence in HMP Parc because, it is deemed, he breached a restraining order that was never served on him in the first place according to UK law [see previous updates regarding the scandal surrounding this entire subject].

A letter dated 1st Febuary was received today from Maurice – still on hunger strike in HMP Parc. In the letter are described the continuing serious irregularities performed by the HMP Parc prison service, perhaps the most serious being vital medications are still denied Maurice, [which have been denied him for “7 weeks” he states], and also vital hospital appointments are still denied him. Regarding the medications being denied, which must be taken immediately before food is taken in order for them to be effective [he has a probable “split diaphragm” in his stomach, + other serious ailments], the prison continues to deny him his prescribed medication – a basic human right that the prison are obliged to follow, but communications to UK and Welsh government agencies concerning this glaring breach of Maurice’s Human Rights [and also the breach of this prison’s own guidelines] by many UK citizens prove futile and ignored. Maurice remarks in his latest communication that the bizarre excuse was used by the prison staff that they had actually “lost” the container that the medications were stored in, thus denying him yet again his medication, but when they find it they will dispense it to him – a promise that wasn’t kept!

Maurice writes also that:

he has locked in his cell  for 24 hrs / day, and been denied post “for 5 days”!

On going to the room allocated for the dispensing of medications to inmates, he was denied his medication yet again, Maurice states that he is “on report” for the 2nd time for not leaving the ground floor door of the medical room where there is a hatch where the medications are dispensed to inmates. Being “on report” and being found “guilty” by the prison authorities will cause an inmate to be punished. eg. to lose his canteen, or other similar restrictions that are deemed “priveleges” by the prison service. Maurice states that this is the “2nd time” he has been placed “on report”.

He has it confirmed “in writing” from the prison that he is indeed registered a “MAPPA 3, Cat. 3” subject, after it was reported that this allocation was said to have been abandoned in years past. However, the reasons for such an serious registration being in place now has not been explained in any form by anyone he’s contacted and asked – within the prison or outside of it – another glaring breach of Maurice’s rights. Perhaps any UK or Welsh government agency will not concede the fact that this allocation of Maurice being a MAPPA subject was already abandoned some time ago –  and why will noone answer Maurice’s question to them asking why he is subjected to this registration? The governments and its agencies are obliged to inform any subject the reasoning for any MAPPA registration. But not for Maurice, it seems!

Maurice writes that he has been denied his prison canteen “for 2 weeks”, meaning stamps are denied him for the sending of letters – which means he is denied sending many letters to court officials and authority figures regarding this present term of most questionable imprisonment, along with numerous other miscarriages of justice performed in the past that have been forced upon him, including letters regarding his MAPPA registration, of course. Naturally the governments know this present and entire conviction and it’s resulting term of 2 years imprisonment imposed on Maurice is riddled with errors and flaws and legal irregularities, thus anything to deny him writing to anyone in order to try and attempt justice regarding the inhuman and barbaric tortures imposed and being imposed upon him at present. Maurice had 30+ legal cases ongoing against mostly Welsh authorities, especially the S. Welsh police, those cases being blocked now because of  completely erroneous reasons concocted by the same authorities complained of in order that justice cannot be done. Since 2009 Maurice, 72, has served over 6 years in prison – each term on the most highly questionable of grounds, eg. in the past Maurice has been locked up for months on end on remand in a Welsh prison, before being released with the charges all being mysteriously dropped – with no compensation or proper explanation ever being given to him regarding the loss of these 6+ years of his life spent behind bars for no good reason. Such is the Welsh legal system regarding Maurice Kirk, who’s only “fault” is to try and show the utter deceit and dishonesty flourishing within the Welsh police and connected agencies. It is truly a disgrace and a public scandal that has blighted Maurice’s life for over 23 years – and it is still ongoing in HMP Parc!

The communications received 06 Feb. 2018:

Past posts

MAURICE KIRK: ON HUNGER STRIKE IN HMP PARC + WHY MAPPA 3 STATUS? – 03 FEB 18 + archive

Received 03 Feb. 2018.  M states he’s on hunger strike since last w/end due to still no meds or access to doctor.  He writes he’s been given a MAPPA certificate after trying to establish his status – he asks WHY … Continue reading 

.

Maurice Kirk: Solicitors to avoid – 1966 Disclosure Act SHAMEFULLY DENIED FOR MAURICE + more 02 Feb. 2018 + archive

As shown in other recent posts, certain solicitors have been paid £20000+ by Maurice, but he’s let down by them for no good reason:  “THOSE WHO HAVE IGNORED MY LETTERS SINCE 14 DECEMBER 2018”, including CERTAIN SOLICITORS: 4th RESTRAINING ORDER … Continue reading 

.

MAURICE KIRK: Notes from HMP Parc: STILL DENIED RIGHTFUL MEDICATION AT THE PROPER TIMES, OR AT ALL – IS THE COMPANY G4S FIT TO BE EMPLOYED AT HM PRISONS? OBVIOUSLY NOT – 29 Jan. 2018 + archive

Received 29 Jan. 2018: RCJ 1CF03361 – 201704259B4 JL 1] IMB have answered not one query from me in HMP Swansea or G4S controlled HMP Parc – so it was on no surprise to me that the prison chaplain Phil … Continue reading 

.

MAURICE KIRK: FALSE MEDICAL REPORT TO FABRICATE “MAPPA” REGISTRATION + LAW FIRMS LET MAURICE DOWN UNBELIEVABLY + more 24 Jan. 2018 + archive

UPDATE 27 Jan. 2018:   OUTRAGEOUS!: Hundreds of cases dropped over evidence #disclosure failings + People trafficking case collapses over disclosure failings – BBC 26 Jan. 18 VIDEO http://butlincat.blogspot.com/2018/01/hundreds-of-cases-dropped-over-evidence.html?spref=tw ————————————————————————————————— To: Criminal Appeal Office, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A … Continue reading 

.

MAURICE KIRK: LETTERS RECEIVED EXPLAIN HMP PARC’s LACK OF DUTY AND CARE – 20 Jan. 18 + archive

Further notes received 19 Jan. 2018 from Maurice Kirk explain his present completely unacceptable situation in HMP Parc. He is serving an extremely questionable 2 year term of imprisonment imposed on the 14 December 2017 at Cardiff Crown Court for … Continue reading 

.

MAURICE KIRK: OUTRAGEOUS! STILL DENIED MEDICATION AND URGENT HOSPITAL APPOINTMENTS IN HMP PARC- 19 Jan. 2018 + archive

The ourageous hostilities against Maurice Kirk continue during his stay in HMP Parc, Bridgend – he is still denied vital medication for no conceivable reason, the medication already prescribed to him before he entered prison. Prearranged hospital appointments are also … Continue reading 

.

MAURICE KIRK: CAN ANYONE PLEASE HELP MAURICE? – 16 Jan. 2018 + archive

Today 16 Jan. 2018 letters [below] were received from Maurice, who is being treated appallingly, as usual, in HMP Parc, Bridgend, Wales. He writes that he is still refused phone calls out to friends / family, and also that he … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | 1 Comment | Edit

MAURICE KIRK: DEFENCE NOTE: “POLICE WITHOLD EVIDENCE” + BLATANT FALSEHOOD USED – 12 Jan. 2018 + archive

Received 10 Jan. 2018: Regarding this former state employed doctor TW with his friends in high policing roles back then and his totally false “report” stating MK had a “brain tumour” and was a “danger to himself and society” and … Continue reading 

.

MAURICE KIRK: PRISON STILL DENIES BASIC RIGHTS, + SERIOUS SENTENCING HEARING IRREGULARITIES – 05 Jan. 18 + archive

Communications received from Maurice Kirk today not only tell of the illegal denial of his basic rights whilst serving a term of imprisonment, but also the blatant miscarriages of justice that occurred at his sentencing hearing on the 14 December … Continue reading 

.

MAURICE KIRK: LETTER FROM HMP PARC: REFUSED BASIC RIGHTS AGAIN – 31 DEC 17

Maurice writes from HMP Parc – letter dated 28 Dec. 17 – he was sentenced to 2 years imprisonment at Cardiff Crown Ct. on the 14 December for the alleged “breach of a restraining order” again – an order that … Continue reading 

 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

NB: DISCLAIMER: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Carol Woods Coverup: I.P.T. [Investigatory Powers Tribunal] refuse to respond to the installation of the illegal tracking device in Carol Wood’s car by Lancs. police – CAR VANDALISED: POLICE DO NOTHING – 23 Dec. 17 + archive

Some Background:

Carol Woods = “It is a highly complex matter which the police organise where they try to make me someone I am not. They have in fact tried to invent me as the reverse of myself using numerous characters, including “neighbours” who live alongside myself, and others elsewhere – the entire situations going back years. I find things out because I am not stupid. See my original w’blowing blog York LGO Blog re Lancashire CC   http://criticalreader2006.blogspot.ae/ you will see why I am hounded by lowlife RECRUITED to do that by the Gestapo.

More is described here:   “Harassment as punishment for whistle-blowing: Lancashire” http://criticalreader17.blogspot.ae/2017/02/harassment-as-punishment-for-whistle.html.

——————————————————————————————–

After sending the latest complaint by way of 20 pages of printed notes [pic above] by recorded delivery to the IPT [Investigatory Powers Tribunal] regarding the illegal installing of a GPS device in Carol Wood’s car by Lancs. police, and then phoning them weeks later [as I’d had no acknowledgement to the 20 pages] and finding out they “hadn’t received” these notes, despite the recorded delivery being signed for at their correct location [see the signed receipt below], then being told in that same call to send them again with their official forms, and then waiting months for some kind of progress regarding the illegal GPS tracking device I received the letter below which tells that all was a waste of time, and money. This complete ignoring of a complaint by the IPT regarding Lancs. police’s clear breach the Data Protection Act [and European Convention of Human Rights Article 8, which concerns a citizen’s privacy, etc. – see below] surely shows the lawlessness rampant throughout the chronic and completely unacceptable and hostile targeting of Carol Woods by a police force – Lancs. police force – and their cronies in high places, including the Lancs. county council, Royal Mail and other household names who continue to break the law on an almost daily basis!! So, the IPT don’t want to know, with at least 3 letters from the Home Office telling me to go to the IPT, and the IPCC have already said they’ed be sending anything sent to them regarding Lancs. police back to Lancs. police, it all proves a complete and utter waste of time, and Lancs. police have carte blanche to break the laws exactly how they like with no one in the UK government calling them to account. Carol Woods is no “jihadi terrorist” or a member of any Mafia – she is a completely harmless old age pensioner who is a retired top social worker and Child Protection Officer  and Probation Officer and who spent her entire working career [for Lancs. county council, amongst others] in service to others – especially vulnerable children! Lancs. police’s [and others] problem is that Carol blew the whistle on rampant corruption  – see Carol’s original w’blowing 2006 blog post “York LGO Blog re Lancashire Co. Council”   http://criticalreader2006.blogspot.ae/ which explains why the abhorrent and complex targeting began – targeting that includes an infinite number of serious crimes enacted by officials, plus a] organised gangstalking by recruited neighbours she’s forced to endure daily [many of these recruited neighbours being unemployed thugs who are rewarded for their crimes out of the public purse – everything organised – it is alleged – by Lancs. police!], b] infinite DWP / Social Security frauds, c] infinite ID frauds using Carol’s credentials [Carol’s ID being got my R. Mail fraudulent deliveries of her mail to adjoining criminal neighbours who then use the ID gleaned for criminal purposes], and so much more she’s forced to experience daily – and has been forced to experience for years – ALL PAID FOR BY THE TAXPAYER – see  “Harassment as punishment for whistle-blowing: Lancashirehttp://criticalreader17.blogspot.ae/2017/02/harassment-as-punishment-for-whistle.html which details just some of her targeting.

Also – along with numerous MPs and government agencies [from the P.M. down] including the IPCC, the IPT, and Lancs. police themselves, the HMIC [Her Majesty’s Inspector of Constabularies] totally ignore recent communications sent to them too regarding this ongoing blatant and extremely serious lawbreaking by a police force acting as a crime cartel does  – resulting in complete and utter lawlessness!!!  [see “MESSAGE TO HMIC BOSS – 13 DEC. 2017 + archive  .

Below, the I.P.T. reject the notification to them regarding rampant lawbreaking by Lancs. police:

This is the R. Mail signed recorded delivery receipt  [signature deliberately distorted] connected to the original communication with 20 pages of notes  which, I was told, “didn’t arrive” at the IPT, although this signature surely shows the opposite. The repeat sending of the same notes were sent in exactly the same way, to the same postal address, and were received perfectly well but, as the letter above shows, all was a waste of time regarding the installation of the GPS tracking device in the car although it surely clearly breaches the most basic of Data Protection laws as well as Article 8 of the E.C.H.R. [see below]:

————————————————————————————————————————
WHAT is happening to Carol Woods, with her constant surveillance by the authorities and gangstalking by recruited yobs, along with others must surely be a specialist operation undertaken by Lancs. police. Is it not interesting that:

Chief Constable ​ [Merseyside police at present, formerly of Lancs. police]​

 Andy Cooke, QPM

​ ​
​  In 2008 I left Merseyside after being appointed as Assistant Chief Constable at Lancashire Constabulary with responsibility for Specialist Operations” [from:  ​https://www.merseyside.police.uk/about-us/chief-officer-group/chief-constable-andy-cooke-qpm/
Specialist operations? What is happening to Carol Woods is surely aSpecialist Operation“!
He also led the ACPO Witness Protection programme in 2015 when this radio programme was made – see @ 9mins 30secs into this video https://vimeo.com/177346278 on certain failings of that operation.

Numerous communications have been sent to Mr. Cooke, and many others at Lancs. police regarding the deplorable targeting of Carol Woods, beginning in 2006 – everything has been ignored – see the recent update where Carol’s car was vandalised, but the local police refused to even acknowledge the  crime: 

The Carol Woods Coverup: Car vandalised – Lancs. police do nothing 19 Dec. 2017

—————————————————————————————————————————–

Another recent update – [see ARCHIVE of all 120+ posts since Feb. 2016 – https://butlincat.com/?s=carol+woods ] 

Archive continues:

The Carol Woods Coverup: UPDATE: THE ILLEGAL GPS DEVICE IN CAROL’S CAR BRINGS OUT THE STALKERS – 19 Dec. 17 + archive

 

On 18 December 2017 at 19:02, carol woods <woodsresearch2002@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Dear Sirs,
I called into Lancaster University and as usual via the ILLEGAL GPS on my car which you all know about and do nothing about to assist me, the Gestapo arrange ANOTHER FRAUD and thug with trollop in “met with” farce INTENDED TO FORGERY and DEFRAUD ME. I attach here YET AGAIN the PROOF that the thugs in Lancashire have pretended for YEARS that I have met with lowlife when I have not. Not one person responded to the PROOF of FORGERY, FRAUD and worse.
Thus I leave the uni library and a local roughneck had been sent to stand about and “hide” outside but to walk as if “with me” when I left. (YOU FUND ALL THIS PROVIDING TAXIS ETC.) She had the PINK BAG which the Gestapo use in lunacy to pretend the user is me or my daughter. The reason is out of scope of this but the reason has been sent many times to show what lunatics I deal with. I took a photo of that troll. Also parked in a hiding position was the usual large car of thug, white which was then to speed off and PRETEND that I was with MY daughter and WE MET WITH THAT THUG as it was the 18th and they want to “revise” the 18 Sept 2008 FRAUD. I met with no one; all the plans to “see me off” by using lowlife round Fell View LA2 9RP having failed again to manufacture “proof I commit fraud, theft etc” they resort to “meeting with”. I met with no one and who paid that thug to drive all this way to park and pretend and, what was in it for the troll? Yours Carol Woods Ms I have heard from no one at all incidentally and have no phone whatever the deranged try to invent for me. Under duress at 28 Fell View LA2 9RP. Please feel free to quote me.
PS the daughter is one they threatened and intimidated for years as she was a great support for me. I have not seen her for 5 years now so the thugs leave her alone; MIKE TODD was murdered in all this leading to Sept 2008 and my daughter the lunatics dragged into it for a reason which will ALL be revealed. I will also add that via their ILLEGAL activity, they have spoiled the scanner I use in Lancaster university library; they want to stop me scanning here as they claim so many others are me who have no access to the uni and, they want to stop me scanning more of what Mike Todd had in front of him, what he was prosecuting on and why he was murdered. SOME of what he had in front of him was a bogus bankruptcy, perjury, EXTORTION, DEMAND MONEY WITH MENACES, WITNESS INTIMIDATION, ATTEMPTED MURDER PREMEDITATED, POLICE CORRUPTION AND CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER CHILD ABUSE ETC ETC. You can’t all be corrupt or cowardly; someone needs to assist me. Why would I want to meet with a thug and agree to pay money not owed?
I returned to the library after the troll had walked off and the thug had driven off. We will see if they want to repeat the exercise when I leave again.
​==============================================

SECTION OF A MESSAGE TO A [so called] TOP BARRISTER, 18 Dec. 2017: [there was no reply – so far. Interesting. This was the same barrister who told me this police force couldn’t be prosecuted. I replied that I thought “noone was above the law”? How foolish we general public are to think all men are equal under the law when its not like that at all].

“Regarding the errors which show themselves connected to this Act [regarding this device installed in Ms. Wood’s car], obvious discrepancies arise, do they not, when I quote the Act’s wording, and what is actually occurring in real time, for it is clearly stated within the Act that, regarding GPS devices and motor vehicles:

it is vital that organisations maintain a vehicle tracking policy that is fully transparent and compliant with the Data Protection Act. Under this Act, persons who have tracking devices installed in the vehicles they own have the right to know what information is being held about them and the purpose for which it will be used. For this reason, collecting data covertly is considered to be in breach of the law”.  

To summerise: if the actions of Lancs. police are “covert policing actions” as they have clearly stated in writing in a letter, then that action clearly contravenes the D.P. Act as the actions are not “fully transparent”, and have to be. By not telling any information, it is surely deemed “secretive”, or covert”, is it not?

The D.P. Act goes on to state:
Furthermore, personal data can only be processed if at least one of the following applies:
1•The person concerned must have consented to the process
2•There is a contractual or legal obligation to process the data
3•It is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the subject”.

Taking the statement to pieces, we note that 

a] the words by the 1st dot:  “The person concerned must have consented to the process” [of having the device in her car] –  Ms. Woods did not consent to the process of her motor vehicle being tracked, which rules out the very 1st line shown above being followed properly, according to the Act, 

and 

b] re: the 2nd line above, by the 2nd dot: “There is a contractual or legal obligation to process the data”– Ms. Woods has not been given any data pertaining to this device, “processed” or “unprocessed” and therefore the “legal obligation” by Lancs. police is broken, especially because the wording in the Act states: “Under this Act, persons who have tracking devices installed in the vehicles they own have the right to know what information is being held about them and the purpose for which it will be used”. Please note that Ms. Woods has been told nothing about anything re: the device, and the device has been in her car much longer than when she made the SAR [FOIA] request and paid the fee at the force’s Hutton HQ in Ja. 2017. Another clear irregularity where laws are broken.

Lancs. police have stated in writing that this device falls under “covert policing actions” and as such do not tell anything regarding this device – what it’s for, why it is there, or what information is gleaned by the device and what that info is used for – all these actions fall foul of the spirit of the Act and the Act itself – which surely makes the device totally not legal. 

Nothing to do with the device is “fully transparent” from Ms. Woods perspective, which it should be. 

Finally, the statement in the 3rd line and by the 3rd dot, referring presumably to 1] Ms. Woods being “the subject” = and the words: “It is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the subject”: Ms. Woods is not protected in any way by having this device in her car, and BE IT KNOWN THAT THE DIRECT OPPOSITE IT TRUE AS THERE HAVE BEEN DIFFERENT ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS UPON MS. WOODS BY STALKERS WHILST SHE HAS BEEN DRIVING HER CAR – THE EXACT OPPOSITE of a “protective” device, as clearly stated within the Act. 

Surely it is clear that Lancs. police’s “policy” fails entirely to be not only “a policy that is fully transparent and compliant with the Data Protection Act”, but that the Act has failed to be followed in so many areas.

PLUS this device ALSO breaches the E.C.H.R., Article 8 as already explained, that being the device breaches Ms. Woods privacy every time she enters her car.” [ends]

———————————————————————————–

The Carol Woods Coverup: UPDATE: THE TRACKING DEVICE: LANCS. POLICE WRITE 17 Nov. 17 – 18 Dec. 17 + more

Despite at least 3 employees at the Home Office, and other government employees recommending in printed letters, including one from Mike Penning MP that I take any grievance regarding Lancs. police’s behaviour connected to Carol Woods to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal [IPT] I can now say that this outfit is doing nothing at all regarding my sending them 15 pages of notes and a wad of their forms regarding the illegal tracking device that was installed in Carol Wood’s car by Lancs. police. Likewise the IPCC has also refused to act on complaints concerning Lancs. police’s actions, and have stated in writing that anything sent will be referred to Lancs. police for conclusion! Not only that, a top barrister, whose name I won’t mention here, has also advised that the CPS will not prosecute a police force, no matter what. There we have it.  Also, the official F.O.I. Act [S.A.R.] fee was paid [and the receipt obtained] to Lancs. police at their Hutton, Preston HQ in January 2017 by Carol Woods for the proper and obligatory information relating to the GPS device in her car, THAT INFORMATION STILL BEING WITHELD BY LANCS. POLICE – another offence. See how the device entered Carol’s car here, below, entitled:  “Carol Woods statement of HOW THE TRACKING DEVICE CAME TO BE IN MS. CAROL WOODS MOTOR VEHICLE”.

Concerning the “Data Protection Act 1998”, it is clearly stated within it that:

it is vital that organisations maintain a vehicle tracking policy that is fully transparent and compliant with the Data Protection Act. Under this Act, persons who have tracking devices installed in the vehicles they own have the right to know what information is being held about them and the purpose for which it will be used. For this reason, collecting data covertly is considered to be in breach of the law.”  To summerise: if the actions of Lancs. police are “covert policing actions” as they have clearly stated in writing in a letter, then that action clearly contravenes the D.P. Act as the actions are not “fully transparent”, and have to be. 

The D.P. Act goes on to state:
“Furthermore, personal data can only be processed if at least one of the following applies:
•The person concerned must have consented to the process
•There is a contractual or legal obligation to process the data
•It is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the subject”.

PLEASE NOTE: a] Ms. Woods did not consent to the process of her motor vehicle being tracked, which rules out the very 1st line shown above, and re: the 2nd line above – Ms. Woods has not been given any data pertaining to this device, and therefore the “legal obligation” by Lancs. police is broken,

and

re: the 3rd line, Ms. Woods is not protected in any way by having this device in her car, and therefore this device is not justified in any way. ALSO, BE IT KNOWN THAT THERE HAVE BEEN ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS UPON MS. WOODS BY STALKERS WHILST SHE HAS BEEN DRIVING HER CAR – THE EXACT OPPOSITE of a “protective” device which is defined in line 3 above, according to the Act. All in all, this device breaches not on the Data Protection Act itself in many areas, but ALSO THE E.C.H.R., as already explained, that being the device breaches Ms. Woods privacy!

A] Ms. Woods has the right to know what information is being held about her and the purpose for which it will be used, but she has never been told anything regarding her motor vehicle being tracked.

Directly below, is the pointless and meaningless response received from Lancs. police, dated 17 November 2017.  I say meaningless because this response doesn’t actually address anything – but it does actually state the no investigation AT ALL has been undertaken regarding the complaint made about the GPS tracking device in Carol’s car, only a response at “local resolution” level – a pointless exercise meaning, more than likely, that an extremely informal chat took place between certain “officers” over a cup of tea during a “tea break” in the police station canteen to resolve the extremely serious and longstanding complaint regarding the horrific and blatant targeting of a vulnerable, single, lawabiding old age pensioner who gave her entire life in service to others – particularly vulnerable and lone CHILDREN. Trying to get the right and proper conclusion to the abject and preplanned flouting of the law by these characters has taken so far 9 months, since March 2017, when my original communication [below]  was sent to the then Chief Constable Finnegan, who then left his post and moved on! The latest interaction is hardly worth reporting, despite the misleading title of the team that has been sadly been corresponding for a minimum amount of time compared to the original date of beginning this complaint  – MARCH 2017 – 9 MONTHS AGO. All that’s happened is that nothing to do with any investigation or conclusion to anything has taken place, or even been remotely near, yet pointless paperwork like the below was sent, to presumably, keep me quiet, in,line, shut up and satisfiedI don’t think so.   Despite this contemptuous timewasting and subsequent squandering of our tax money [which funds the pointless nonsense of illegal tracking devices in totally lawabiding citizen’s cars also] LANCS. POLICE ARE STILL GUILTY OF BREACHING NOT ONLY ARTICLE 8 OF THE E.C.H.R. BUT ALSO THE DATA PROTECTION ACT by not saying anything about it to the innocent recipient of the GPS device which it is their duty to do, and are guilty of probably A WHOLE LOT MORE regarding everything that we aren’t even aware of, such as “unjustifable police actions” and the “rampant squandering of public funds” etc. etc..

Note in the very 1st line of the letter below it states that a “local resolution” has been enacted by Lancs. police instead of the more proper and surely more appropriate “formal investigation” that should have taken place – a dead giveaway that little actual honesty at all is taking place here as opposed to the correct method of dealing with an illegal act and breach of the European Convention on Human Right’s Article 8, which states: 

1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.”

See more regarding the “Data Protection Act” below in my original message to Lancs. police Chief Constable Finnegan, letter dated 31 March 2017, also contemptuously ignored on each sending [I’ve lost count how many letters of complaint have been sent to Lancs. police by myself alone regarding this tracking device, installed in the car of a person who has, probably, never broken a law in her life, and what’s more has more formal qualifications than the entire congregation of “police officers” that make up the entire Lancs, police HQ at Hutton, Preston, including the chief and deputy chief constables – and all the rest!]. Please use copious amounts of “discernment” regarding the latest extremely disappointing use of resources, and citizen’s taxes:

..

What kind of police force is  this that can persecute a lawabiding pensioner so badly for so long [since 2006]? For Lancs. police are responsible for a great deal of extremely questionable behaviour – for which there is OVERWHELMING and UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE.

The subject of pursuing justice regarding the despicable actions of LANCS. POLICE will be continue until JUSTICE IS DONE!!

See related: 

video: ILLEGAL GPS TRACKING DEVICE INSTALLED IN CAROL WOODS’s CAR – 18 Sept. 17

 

made during the 3 day visit – see more:  “…the Visit”:  The Shocking Carol Woods Coverup: VISIT / Lancs: Compromise agreement falsified, + archive 10 July 17

more:

— Received from Ms. Carol Woods on 17 OCTOBER 2017:

“Carol Woods statement of HOW THE TRACKING DEVICE CAME TO BE IN MS. CAROL WOODS MOTOR VEHICLE”

16 / 10 / 2017

“hi, just got the mail – completely crazy at my return [Ms. Woods had been away on holiday…JG.] – preface my car was not at an airport car park – apparently I am the owner of a silver grey Yaris much newer than mine – I seem to be an Asian female with long, dark hair.
Preface Fell View is now 298 Oxcliffe Rd thus I have just bought my car AND AM NOT THE VICTIM FROM 2012.

I looked on Northern Car Sales site, Shaw Rd. Oldham January 2012 when staying with my sister – I only went onto the yard to get rid of a thug following me – he just used his phone presumably to say I looked at cars. I decided a car for sale was affordable and having a car would solve massive problems. I went back the next day and felt sure they expected me. Another car had appeared – the red Yaris and I was diverted to that. I had a test drive, liked it, agreed to buy it – cash. But the car price was £40 short of [my sister owed me money so I knew I’d get it] – the garage was responsible for completing the tear off strip for DVLA doc. change of owner / address of registered person. All that done, I had to go and get insurance before removing the car – I knew I’d have been arrested for driving without insurance if I drove it just to my sister’s. The insurance matter was awful – I’ve had other cars and never experienced the antics but – all done the garage told me not to collect the car until 5pm on 21/1/12 – why? Surely they just wanted it off the yard as sold?
I went at 3pm to see what they were up to. My ignition was in bits – I was told they had snapped my key in the lock so needed to replace the system to accomodate a new key. I told them I was not daft – I thought of my white Polo – I told them what I thought they were doing – I was right, they had been
2]
contacted and told if they wanted to stay in business, they’ed do as told. Gestapo? Yes. Then he said “You’re dealing with lunatics” – I said, “I know”. I went to sit in the office – the DVLA slip I could see – the man in the office assured me he would send it on – I was using my sister;s address to register the car. He told me not to bother about the £40 which I’d said I’d drop in with on 22 Jan.
Getting the car about 5, I asked why there was no new key – he’d broken the original, old key, hadn’t he? I also asked why they had not used the spare key and just had a 2nd as spare cut – they knew I knew exactly what had gone on. Oddly, the man said “They can’t keep on arresting you” – “of course they can – who’ll stop them?” I said – a bit more chat – I said I’d be in the next morning with £40, was told not to bother but I wasn’t falling for that. It was a trap.
Parking at my sister’s then showing her the car – I saw 900 miles had been added to the clock from my agreeing to buy it. [I faxed the Home Saecretary and K Clarke at least 3 times each to get that on record – where the hell had I apparently been to use 900 miles?].
The next morning I went with the £40 – they were not open – or pretended – the £40 trap was set. I took a note of the 2 x £20 notes, scribbled a note, put in an envelope and took photos of it going imnto the letterbox. I owed them nothing.
On the 23rd Jan. I drove to Lancaster and transferred my insurance to my company – one I’d used for over 20 years – they were really good and getting all the refund due to me, showed illegal accessing of the company systems.
PTO
The Gestapo pulled me up after I left my insurance company [each event has it’s own story] – just to harass – to be seen to be a liar – then I returned to my sister’s. I left her house and stayed in a guest house for 4 days – called into the garage and they had NOT sent the DVLA doc. on. I asked for it and dealt with it myself. They had no intention of sending it in. For days then weeks then months [I started to rent at 298 on 4/3/12 after driving to Lewes to deal with outstanding matters from 2011 and living in my car most of Feb.] attempts were made to stealing my car key so I would then have to force my locks to get in and have new locks – their problem was they could not claim I had stolen the car, that I drove without insurance, and that I knew of the GPS – and how I could prove they had not broken the key at all to have a new ignition system fitted.
With amazing luck, my car key was stolen but I had the spare key in my bag so didn’t need to force the locks – had another spare cut and so it went on.
Followed into the ladies in students union offices which are not open to all and sundry – at the Uni – washing my hands – my keys placed by the sink disappeared – reported – ignored. I knew it had to be 1 of 2 trolls – again, I’d had my spare in my bag and always keep a spare. 2 garages have looked [April ’16 and May ’16] to see if they can remove it but said “too sophisticated” and will disable the car if they try to remove it.”
[ENDS]

N.B.: Everything to do with this illegal GPS tracking device, including everything above was sent as a complaint to Lancs. police, and their “Investigations Team”s response was – nothing, and thus everything was then forwarded to the Investigations Powers Tribunal [IPT] after filling in all their forms, and sending 15 pages or so of documents pertaining to the device and related items, including Lancs. police’s so-called “responses” – the IPT’s response has also been – nothing. The woman I spoke to weeks ago at the IPT when chasing up my sending of the  IPT forms and related docs. notifying the IPT about this GPS device even told me the IPT tribunal would probably dismiss my contacting them regarding this matter of this illegal GPS device, or deem everything inadmissable – and this was the receptionist on the phone one gets when initially calling in to the!  To date, 12 Dec. 17, I am still waiting to hear from the IPT regarding anything to do with the 15 pages of notes and forms sent to them – completely unaccptable! 

“COVERT POLICING TACTICS”?

Regarding the illegal “tracking device” installed in Carol Wood’s motor vehicle, and despite CW’s asking for obligatory information from Lancs. police regarding this device after her paying the proper “Freedom of Information” request fee at Lancs. police Hutton HQ in January 2017 was totally ignored, Lancs. police wanted a letter of permission, finally, from CW so I could interact with Lancs. police on her behalf so my complaint regarding this “tracking device” being installed in Carol Woods motor vehicle [and other matters] could be taken seriously.

One original contact with Lancs. police was in March 2017 [below] to the chief constable Finnegan, who promptly moved on from his postition – my communication completely ignored, as was every other communication sent until I contacted 3 chief constables a couple of months later regarding not being able to report serious crime to the police, which was also ignored by all sent to, so then I had no choice but to begin complaining about that. The “Investigations Support Team” of Lancs. police answered finally, [below] requiring a “letter of permission” from Carol Woods so as I could interact on her behalf regarding matters, also below. Now, after that “letter of permission” was finally received in writing from CW, and sent to Lancs. police, still nothing is done by Lancs. police Professional Standards and “Investigations Team” about this “tracking device”!

Typical recent  communication from the Lancs. police “Professional Standards” dept. regarding my complaint to them regarding the device in Carol’s car, which breaches not only the E.C.H.R. but also the Data Protection Act:

THE “LETTER OF PERMISSION”:

The “letter of permission” from Carol Woods, dated 24 August 17, asked for by and sent 25 Aug. 17 to Lancs. police by recorded delivery 1st class Royal Mail, partly acknowledged now by Lancs. police:

Below, the original [ignored] communication from 31 March 2017 to the then Lancs. police chief constable Finnegan regarding the illegal GPS tracking device in Carol’s car. All other communications regarding this subject and reporting serious crime are ignored by all police contacted – including my local police, and 3 chief constables, until finally 2 local officers visited myself unexpectedly [after I had written so many times to the Dorset CC trying to make contact with police] on Saturday 9 June 17 at 9pm   claiming – after my explaining as best I could the utter chaos Carol is forced to suffer courtesy of the authorities in Lancs., – that they would report matters concerning Carol Woods to Lancs. police, and Carol would be contacted by Lancs. police forthwith. Of course no such contact has been made by Lancs. police to Carol as promised – the daily persecution continues unabated, though.

“From:  Mr. J. Graham, [redacted]

To:  Mr.  S. Finnegan,  Chief Constable of Lancashire Police,
Lancashire Constabulary Headquarters,
Saunders Lane,
Hutton nr Preston,
PR4 5SB.

31 March 2017

Dear Mr. Finnegan,

I am writing to you concening the tracking device installed in the motor vehicle used by Ms. CAROL WOODS.

Ms Carol Woods address is:  28 Fell View, Caton, Lancashire, LA2 9RP.

I’m sure you are aware that regarding Ms. Woods motor vehicle, not only does such a device installed in her vehicle contavene 1] the Data Protection Act 1998, but also contravenes Ms. Woods rights according to 2] the European Commission of Human Rights [E.C.H.R.] – please see below:

1] The Data Protection Act 1998:

“The UK vehicle tracker laws fall under the category of processing personal data and accordingly, it is governed by the Data Protection Act 1988. In order to ensure vehicle tracking legality, it is vital that organisations maintain a vehicle tracking policy that is fully transparent and compliant with the Data Protection Act. Under this Act, persons who have tracking devices installed in the vehicles they own have the right to know what information is being held about them and the purpose for which it will be used. For this reason, collecting data covertly is considered to be in breach of the law.
Furthermore, personal data can only be processed if at least one of the following applies:
•The person concerned must have consented to the process
•There is a contractual or legal obligation to process the data
•It is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the subject”.

PLEASE NOTE: a] Ms. Woods did not consent to the process of her motor vehicle being tracked, and

b] Ms. Woods has the right to know what information is being held about her and the purpose for which it will be used, but she has never been told anything regarding her motor vehicle being tracked.

and

2] The European Court of Human Rights “Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides a right to respect for one’s “private and family life, his home and his correspondence”

1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.”

PLEASE NOTE:  referring to the European Court of Human Rights, Article 8:
Ms. Woods right to privacy has clearly been breached by the interference of this tracking device installed in her motor vehicle.

Mr. Finnegan, it is clear that such a tracking device installed in Ms. Woods motor vehicle is in clear breach of these 2 statutes cited above, and in the respect of trying to obtain information regarding this tracking device, Ms. Woods states:
 “I have asked specifically for the data in relation to PERMISSION for GPS sought and then gained, and paid £10

but received nothing. I TOOK my £10 in Jan 2017 after asking if I needed to pay £10 via

data.protection@lancashire.pnn.police.uk Jan this year, it was acknowledged as received as I drove all the way to HUTTON HQ, to deliver it (I asked them to formally acknowledge receipt) as well as getting a receipt there at the front desk”. Therefore Ms. Woods has applied for the information regarding the tracking device in her vehicle, but not received any information in return – an extremely serious irregularity. Can you please remove this device from Ms. Woods motor vehicle that is clearly falling foul of the statutes in place – those being the Data Protection Act 1998  and the Article 8 of the European Commission of Human Rights?

Mr. Finnegan, failure to acknowledge this communication will result in my contacting the highest authorities regarding these breaches of the said statutes stated above.

Thank you.

J. Graham  concerned citizen” [ENDS]

After much stalling by the Lancs. police to even admit there was a tracking device in Ms. Woods car this letter below was finally received on the 27 September 17 from Lancs, police “Investigations Team” with the admission that a tracking device was being used in Carol’s car and was being used under “covert policing tactics“, which is quite a remarkable example of bs considering known jihadi terrorists in the UK surely are not stalked  as severely, nor are organised criminal gang members. Carol is neither of those, and it is painfully obvious that the only reason the device is being used at all is to blatantly harass and gangstalk Carol every time she goes out and drives her car.  Indeed, attempts to murder Carol have taken place when she has been driving her car, when the unemployed stalking yobs who harass Carol all the time anyway have tried a few times to manufacture road traffic accidents where Carol would be the injured – or deceased – party. I myself witnessed – as a passenger in Carol’s car when I visited earlier this year – these stalking yobs driving their car perilously close to Carol’s completely unneccessarily, and performing outrageous manoevres with the passengers in the offending car looking back, once passed, laughing hysterically at their perverse actions. Again, Lancs. police have much to answer for by paying these thugs to perform such cr-p, deliberately endangering lives in the process.

“COVERT POLICING TACTICS” ARE CITED IN THE LETTER BELOW FROM LANCS. POLICE AS THE REASON this GPS device has been installed in Carol’s car – BUT WHY? Carol is no “JIHADI TERRORIST”, nor a member of any ORGANISED CRIME CARTEL, or anything to do with anything CRIMINAL, yet Lancs. police have installed this GPS tracking device in her car and WON’T TELL HER WHY!!  WHYEVER NOT??  Not only does this GPS device breach Carol’s HUMAN RIGHTS [Article 8 of the E.C.H.R.] but by not telling Carol why the device is there in the first place also breaches Carol’s rights under the DATA PROTECTION ACT. She has paid the correct fee at the Lancs. police Hutton HQ in January 2017 via a FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST [S.A.R.] that is the normal procedure to get the information but still Lancs. police refuse to forward any to her – ANOTHER CRIME!!27 sept covert lREDACT ancs inv20171016_00142207

THE IPCC:

Also, before contacting the IPT, a complaint was made to the IPCC  regarding not being able to report serious crimes, which included the

a] installation of the “tracking device” in CW’s vehicle,

b] Dorset Police hanging up in me when being contacted by them regarding reporting serious crimes pertaining to Carol Woods to any police,

and

c] Lancs. police ignoring communications to them over the months, and not responding after the 2 Dorset officers who visited myself on 9 June 17 claiming they would be contacting Lancs. police who would then be contacting Carol Woods [no such contact was made, naturally]. Below is my complaint to the IPCC and their response – which was to pass everything back to Lancs. police, who were stonewalling in the first place and responsible for the numerous irregularities anyway!!!, [and still are]:

To:   enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
26 June 2017 at 22:45
Dear Ms. Coulton,
Here, below, is my latest communication to yourself in reply to your message to me, dated 22 June 17.
 I DO wish to report as stated to the I.P.C.C. the matters described.
Thank you.
J. Graham  concerned citzen
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: !enquiries <enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
Date: 22 June 2017 at 12:32
Subject: IPCC Reference – xxxxxxx

To: “butlincat75@googlemail.com” <butlincat75@googlemail.com>Dear Mr Graham

Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). We acknowledge receipt of your email dated 13 June 2017, the contents of which have been filed under the above reference number.

I note from your email that you are unhappy with the police, however it is not clear if you are wishing to submit a formal complaint against the police.

If you wish to make a new complaint or allegation of misconduct against a serving member of the police then the IPCC can forward it on your behalf to the relevant police force. If you do wish to make such a complaint or allegation we will need to be provided with the following information;

WHO? Which police force is your complaint about?

WHERE? Where did the incident/s happen that led to your complaint?

WHEN? When did the incident/s happen that led to your complaint?

WHAT? Please describe the circumstances that have led to you feeling the police have treated you badly.

If however you do not wish to make a new complaint or allegation of misconduct, or submit an appeal against a concluded investigation into a previous complaint I do not believe the IPCC can assist you any further at this time.

Please note that all complaints made to the IPCC by law must be forwarded to the ‘appropriate authority’ for consideration – usually this is the Professional Standards Department (PSD) of the police force concerned. When you submit your complaint in full your details will be passed onto the PSD for consideration.

Yours sincerely

Customer Contact Advisor Independent Police Complaints Commission

(IPCC)———- Forwarded message ———-
From: butlincat <butlincat75@googlemail.com>
Date: 23 June 2017 at 11:14
Subject: IPCC Reference – 2017/087595
To: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

Dear IPCC

I do wish to raise a complaint against Lancs police

​ – specifically Mr. ​S. ​Finnegan C​hief Constable as he refuses to answer numerous messages to him,
​specifically the one shown below dated 31 March 17, and against also their Professional Standards, who are mentioned in the attached  response ​[letter] from Lancs police – they still have not contacted me as promised.
Thanks
J. Graham
.

The above communication was replied to in full by the IPCC – the end result simply stating that everything was passed back to Lancs. police by the IPCC – hence the Lancs Police “Investigations Team” finally responding via their “covert police tactics” letter on the 27 September 2017. The next stage was complaining to the IPT, which was done, but has got nowhere as I write on 12 Dec. 17. – the entire process beginning in March 2017 with the letter to the ex-CC Finnegan.

Meanwhile, the Home Office wrote to send everything regarding this “tracking device” to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal [as already detailed above] – the letter dated 31 August 17, something that Carol did already some time ago – her comment: 

Date: 5 September 2017 at 15:46
Subject: Re: Fwd: Win cw

Hi thanks for this; firstly, I have 3 huge files from the Gestapo from 2002 when they claimed to the IPT that they had never heard of me and that I had never lived in Lancaster. That led to all sorts which included the IPT ceasing the FULL INQUIRY into my case after NATIONAL news bulletin April 2006, “The government has ordered an inquiry into how Lancashire conducts its affairs”. The Gestapo spoiled all that: the IPT just returned my file to me with no comments. It was March 2008 JUST THE WEEK MIKE TODD WAS MURDERED when the IPT told me in a letter that they thought Carol Woods was an alias and that I was really someone else somewhere else, my sister in fact.” [ENDS]

The above are just part of numerous communications to and from UK government departments regarding the appalling and illegal targeting of Carol Woods by certain UK government personnel paid by the taxpayer to act in a responsible and honest manner, which include, especially, the police – local to Ms. Woods and the main force, and the county council, and all connected, including Royal Mail, who refuse to do anything regarding Carol’s mail being deliberately diverted and misdelivered, or delivered to her months later – or not delivered at all.

to be continued, when any progress is made with these dubious government departments!

RELATED:

The Shocking Carol Woods Coverup: SHOCKINGLY, LANCS. POLICE ALTER RECORDS YET AGAIN! + Lancs court corruption ; party to M Todd R.I.P. + The False Arrests / P.C. Massingham’s Perjury 31 Oct. 2017 + archive

——————————————————————————————-

The “Bug Detector” in use: video:

 


RELATED [from earlier]:

The Shocking Carol Woods Coverup: Lancs. police still refuse to acknowledge the illegal “vehicular tracking device” and other serious crimes against Carol Woods 11 Sept. 17 + archive

 

The Carol Woods Coverup: Car vandalised – Lancs. police do nothing 19 Dec. 2017

On Tuesday, 19 December 2017, 20:52, carol woods  wrote:

“Just to let you know I returned to my car after an early cinema show (8 15pm) and found my car window smashed among all the cars parked on the street and only mine any damage. Some people passing loaned me their phone so I rang he Gestapo and a cop came, motor bike and took the details of a car parked illegally at a bus stop near by; he did not bother about my car. Dec 2005 and Daisy Mae Morrison’s car was vandalised outside my house, we had gone into Lancaster. That was WITNESS INTIMIDATION and in Jan 2006 when she called again and her car was written off, I had my court case then stayed to protect my witnesses. In Dec 2008 they stole my car K71 CEC and installed a GPS, I found out and they stole my car taking it to the police garage MACADAMS where they systematically wrecked it to hide the GPS installed then illegally. The Gestapo have stalked all day trying to pretend they see me driven by another. I can drive my car back to Hell View and cover up the windows. They started on my car over a week ago. Carol (so someone knows) the street is terraced houses and someone must have heard it all.

To Lancs but CC to others who will get the gist, I require the name rank and badge number of the Gestapo driving AGAIN this time to confirm he saw me and a RED MINI and not the yellow one of the earlier farce. The yellow MINI details I sent via email; the red was HD59 NUK and does not rewrite the Aug 2015 and helicopter farce using the RED MINI then to pretend A Jackson of 26 Fell View was me.
I also note that YOU arranged for my car windows to be smashed to be Daisy Mae’s car at my house Dec 2005 and then Jan 2006 in WITNESS INTIMIDATION with the thugs then following me to a corner shop to threaten and intimidate me. The dreary old loser stalking me after the library about 5 45pm reminded me of those thugs that night Jan 2006.FOR THOSE CC THIS I HAD MY THEN COURT APPEAL STAYED TO PROTECT MY WITNESSES. DAISY MAE IS BLACK SO IT WAS AGGRAVATED BY RACISM AND HER CAR WAS WRITTEN OFF IN JAN 06 AS MINE WAS IN THE REPEAT OF JAN 2009 AFTER MY HOUSE HAD BEEN WRECKED OF COURSE WITH THE WINDOWS THERE RIPPED OUT IN THAT WRECKING OF MY HOUSE IN OCT 08 PRIOR TO MY CAR.
MY car K71 CEC was stolen with an illegal GPS device fitted in Dec 2008 and then stolen in Jan 2009 and written off BY YOUR GARAGE MACADAMS of Carnforth to hide the illegal GPS then.
I note that the Gestapo biker called after some people were kind enough to help me at my car and reported the TARGETED VANDALISM via their phone. The Gestapo was not calling about my reported car but to note a car illegally parked on a bus stop. EJ61 NPF and if you think that makes me forget the GMP thugs at my brother’s house parked then at a bus stop in Nov 2004 to threaten and intimidate you can think again, bullying thugs. This to GMP thugs and so they know my photos of that night are excellent and WILL BE SEEN.
You are a disgrace. Carol Woods Ms PS the officer taking my car report was decent. I WAIT TO TESTIFY. [ends]

HOW COME THE POLICE OFFICER DESCRIBED ABOVE DIDN’T EVEN RECORD THIS CRIME OF VANDALISM TO A CAR?  WHAT’S GOING ON WITH LANCS. POLICE? 

Some Background to the targeting of Carol Woods:

Carol Woods = “It is a highly complex matter which the police organise where they try to make me someone I am not. They have in fact tried to invent me as the reverse of myself using numerous characters, including “neighbours” who live alongside myself, and others elsewhere – the entire situations going back years. I find things out because I am not stupid. See my original w’blowing blog York LGO Blog re Lancashire CC   http://criticalreader2006.blogspot.ae/ you will see why I am hounded by lowlife RECRUITED to do that by the Gestapo.

More is described here:   “Harassment as punishment for whistle-blowing: Lancashire” http://criticalreader17.blogspot.ae/2017/02/harassment-as-punishment-for-whistle.html.

Apart from numerous and longstanding ID frauds [where goods and other services have been obtained by dubious “neighbours” in her locale using Carol Wood’s ID, much obtained via her stolen mail – something Royal Mail has been notified about an infinite amount of times, with no proper response at all] and along with many other serious crimes enacted in her name [see the list below in the section entitled “Some Background, below] Carol Woods is stalked daily by her neighbours who are, it is very strongly alleged, employed by the local police and other factions of Lancs. county council. Ms. Woods is particularly targeted at the library which she has to use for the use of the computers therein, as having computers and phones etc. at her home has proven futile because of them being hacked by the same individuals who hack the library computers whenever she uses them. These unemployed, mostly male yobs, in the pay of the police etc. to surveille Ms. Woods [it is very strongly alleged], openly sit alongside her in the library, mobile phones in their hands while they hack the computer Ms. Woods is using, scanning and interfering with whichever emails to and from Ms. Woods they see fit, amongst other electronic interference.

What is particularly appalling also is that – apart from the Royal Mail letters being deliberately misdelivered to criminal neighbours etc. – so many serious crimes committed against Ms. Woods have been refused being reported for years now, to the police and other government agencies, including the IPCC who do nothing when told about complaints involving Lancs. police. Apart from Ms. Woods continually contacting police departments and politicians and other government agencies, other supporters have contacted UK Government departments regarding the serious crimes Ms. Woods is victim of, I personally have approached 3 different chief constables of 3 different police forces to no avail, and the IPCC have been complained to regarding this lack of duty by police employees – the IPCC merely passing my concerns back to the force allegedly behind the bulk of so many of the very strongly alleged crimes – Lancs. police. Contacting these UK Government departments has proven a complete waste of time, such is the coverup involved to do with so much of what is very strongly alleged concerning Ms. Carol Woods.

The posts and updates from Ms. Woods on this site alone detail this harassment from Ms. Woods neighbours along with detailing many of the numerous crimes committed since Febuary 2016 when Ms. Woods was forcibly detained for no reason other than to silence her in a mental unit, for the 5th time. As there were no proper grounds for Ms. Woods to be held in the mental unit, she was released after protests were made. This enforced kidnapping of Ms. Woods was the 5th time such a kidnapping had occurred to Ms. Woods because of the input by certain authorities who completely shirk their responsibilities and cover up serious crime – eg. employing and paying from the public purse criminals who flout the law by  stalking Ms. Woods almost daily, and every time Ms. Woods leaves her abode, and also enabling them to partake in numerous ID frauds completely outside of the law, and much more – the reporting of numerous DWP benefit frauds and connected to the DWP fraud department, and to the banks – Barclays and Santander – who had numerous accounts in false names to launder the DWP monies gained illegally, proving a complete waste of time also.

Some more background:

In the latest posts and in the archive linked, Carol  goes into greater detail regarding what she is having to experience from those around her, all with, it seems, the full cooperation and assistance of the local authorities who command the numerous crimes and the actions of the numerous lowlife stalkers she is surrounded by.  Not only do these nightmare neighbours she is surrounded by steal her landline telephone and internet delivery lines running into her house, and misuse it on an almost daily basis by the lines being previously diverted to their more than likely ramshackle homes, they also steal her electricity too when they can [when Carol switches it on], and much more. Carol can hear her neighbours testing their electricity sockets after she has turned her power on from the main switch in her home. For this very reason her electricity supply is having to be almost permanently switched off for fear of it being hacked by these criminal neighbours, she lives by candlelight and she has had to live electricity free in her home for years because of these lowlives’ thieving alongside her home – many of them doting and ageing pensioners who steal her services because they can and do not get criminally charged with anything – courtesy of the fake authoritarian figures in place who should be in prison rather than be sitting pretty in a government office somewhere, local or otherwise. Fake IDs used by so many – if not all – of Carol’s criminal neighbours pay for many things through fake bank accounts, the money all ultimately coming from the UK taxpayer – the general public, as are the new cars given as rewards to certain neighbours paid for the same way – the road tax etc for these cars also paid for by the UK public, as are the numerous “Blue Badge” schemes many of these cars are concessioned with – all registered via false details but paid for out of the public purse. Authorities do nothing when told about these scams – how much longer can these outright crimes continue?

Regarding the internet and phone lines running into her abode: Carol even witnessed the rewiring of such to cater for her neighbours criminal thieving when she came back home from being out one day – the lines being rearranged and diverted into her loft where the neighbour’s connections take place, and thus the ability for these thieves to steal her services. A bit of  detail about this stealing of Carol’s services – when Carol came back from being out one day, she noticed an ironing board, of all things, leaning against a wall in one of her rooms which wasn’t there before she’d gone out. On moving the ironing board, there on the wall was – crudely written in biro or whatever – the electrician or whoever’s drawing for the rewiring of the phone + internet lines being diverted into her loft – for the use of the thieving neighbours as already described. This is why, when out on later outings to wherever, tell-tale ironing boards would be left deliberately en route – leaning against walls or whatever – for Carol not to miss. Such is the cruelty of the minds involved in this entire gangstalking scenario CW is having and has had to put up with for so many years. Does any authority  do anything about any of this stealing of her phone or internet services when they’re notified? No they don’t – the same way as the CEO of Royal Mail ignores all notifications to him regarding misdeliveries of CW’s mail to assorted neighbours [see earlier posts on this]. Other authorities also contemptuously ignore other notifications of gross irregularities / crimes sent to them. Why? Go figure. Semantic battles with the R. Mail’s current CEO proved pointless when trying to report the numerous and longstanding deliberate misdeliveries of mail to the neighbours who give CW such a hard time. As for these loutish neighbours and their hostilities, it’s hard to argue, for example, when someone wearing a police officer’s uniform making out they’re a police officer is intimidating one and breathing down one’s neck giving one preposterous orders to harass and hurt a fellow citizen – but harass and hurt they do, putting aside any semblance of conscience or, dare I say it – guilt. Perhaps the gift of a new car – or two – paid for by the UK taxpayers – eases their conscience and helps these sad characters turn the other cheek and commit serious crime and also stalk so inhumanly someone who devoted her entire working life in service to others – as Carol has – trying to help children especially. These lowlives – and the lowlives controlling all the conspiracies against Carol Woods – have much to answer for, and let’s hope that day comes soon when they get their comeuppance – noone likes a corrupt traitor, especially those who are in the positions they’re in, whose sky-high wages are paid by the UK taxpayer, and its funny how things turn around and come back ten times worse for those perpetrating these obscenities. But that’s noone’s problem but theirs.

It is completely unjust and as outrageous and unfair that I am refused reporting – by 3 separate police forces – serious crimes, as correspondence, or rather ignored correspondences to these 3 police forces, would show [UPDATE 24 JUNE 17 – a few days ago – at 20.53BST on the evening of Saturday 17 June, to be exact, 2 Dorset officers knocked on my door without any forewarning [after my now numerous messages to the Chief Constable]and although unprepared, I duly gave them such info as I could regarding the huge number of crimes listed so far as detailed by and committed against CW. After 50 minutes, one of the officers promised me that “Lancs. police would be got in touch with, with a view for them to contact CW”. Of course I immediately protested that, allegedly, the Lancs. police were one of the very parties behind this series of numerous ongoing crimes, and to do such would be a waste of time. Note that this has been tried before when Lancs. police have been told of certain crimes pertaining to CW by CW, and nothing has been done at all. Nevertheless, this was all I could expect, apparently. Who knows if anything was passed on to Lancs. police, and even if it was, will anything be done about anything? It is now weeks since Dorset police were informed that night of 17 June, and Ms. Woods harassment continues unabated – so the evidence points to the fact that nothing has been done regarding what was reported to those 2 Dorset police officers]. If one complains to higher authorities about this completely unacceptable situation, I would guess that the targeting I am experiencing almost on a daily basis – whenever I go out – would escalate to an unacceptable level, causing me to fear for my very own life. That is why also the updates from CW have been drastically curtailed here. So be it. William Burroughs, the great author, once said that if a person didn’t want to catch malaria, one shouldn’t go to an area where malaria is rife. I seemed to have stumbled into something similar. So be that also…

The question has been asked: “why would the “Powers That Be” target someone such as Carol Woods for so long [since 2006], involving so many perpetrators, committing so many serious crimes, funded by the public and local council taxpayers?”.

Carol Woods is a 63 years old former Lancashire County Council Level 3 Social Worker and Child Protection Officer [who used to train social workers] and a former Probation Officer, amongst many other things. Perhaps the appalling and chronic targeting she has no choice but to put up with 24/7 is because she reported numerous seriously grave irregularities she discovered, including child abuse, when being employed by Lancashire county council, and when one realises that the very controllers of the targeting and stalking Carol is forced to endure are, very probably, very closely connected to the same departments and personnel who are described in the links above and the “IMPORTANT VIDEOS” shown below, which detail what was discovered when Carol worked as a Child Protection officer in Lancashire, then it should not be hard to understand these hostilities enacted against her. Put it this way: the Welsh scientist, weapons expert and authority on biological warfare, employed by the British Ministry of Defence David Kelly was supposed to have leaked serious information to the detriment of the PTB at the time – look what happened to him. Now, Carol is no weapons expert, but one doesn’t have to be one to upset the proverbial apple cart bigtime. And anyway, we are told there have been assassination attempts upon her life too – quite a few in fact, including ramming her car at speed, on a main road, by perpetrators unknown…well, almost unknown.

And why is there an illegal tracking device installed in Ms. Woods car – put there, apparently – by Lancs. police? The Chief Constable of Lancashire has been written to so many times about so many serious matters with no response it’s quite remarkable. Another 2 chief constables have been written to asking can serious crime be reported to their forces also with no response whatsoever, and I have tried on more than one occasion to notify my local police about serious crime at my local central police station to be totally ignored every visit, which is just another public scandal!

Many more serious crimes and misdemeanours committed against Ms. Woods are all completely ignored by whichever UK government agency one tries to take anything to, including:

treason,

many murder attempts upon Carol,

impersonation, ID frauds,

person[s] impersonating police officers in official government hearings, [or hearing[s]  purporting to be official],

Royal Mail frauds,

monetary frauds involving: dubious bank accounts at numerous high street banks, the DWP, Social Security, town council[s] and other agencies,

illegal tracking of motor vehicle via GPS device [or similar],

a high number of motor vehicle “Blue Badge” [UK HM Government concession] frauds,

regular physical harassment / mental torture upon a person [aka “gangstalking”],

telephone / Internet Broadband  / electricity supply fraud,

wrongful arrest,

wrongful kidnapping[s] / incarceration[s] in UK HM Government units, police station[s], HM Prison[s] etc.,

home burglaries, car vandalism going uninvestigated by local police [see 

– many other instances of serious crime and illegal activity exist, and many acts contravening not only the Data Protection Act 1998, but also the contravention of articles pertaining to the European Commission of Human Rights [particularly Article 8].

What is going on is maybe unbelievable, and at times complicated, but that is surely deliberate and part of this outrageous targeting of a law-abiding citizen  – a lone female – who dared to report serious irregularities she found during her employment as a Level 3 social worker and Child Protection Officer. As a result, apart from the crimes committed against her as described, her house and contents with a value of £400,000+ was stolen from her, and her employment tribunal award of £50,000 found its way to someone who conspired against her who fraudulently took Carol Wood’s ID. Other serious crimes exist and continue to  this very day…

IMPORTANT VIDEOS

 1] PLAYLIST [3 videos]: EXPOSING FAKE SOCIAL WORKERS ETC. 06 Febuary 2016

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCT5hwoao38ThHG5Y6q3GSp_hsTwMK2UD

2] Please listen to this vital radio show interview with Ms. Woods from the 12 March 2016

http://www.mixcloud.com/TheFreedomTalkRadioNetwork/lancashire-greater-manchester-harrow-councils-cops-crime-coruption-carol-woods-whistleblower/

3] CAROL WOODS WHISTLEBLOWER ON RADIO lancashire police corruption county council 06 Febuary 2016

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/freedomtalkradioscotland/2016/02/21/andys-sunday-night-show-with-guest

4] CRIMINAL BRITAIN

 SriLankerC 24 April 2016

5] Interview by torquaytalkeytv  31 March 16

6] Carol Woods Social Worker Unlawfully Incarcerated In Psychiatric Gulag  https://youtu.be/-sMukHhkl4o   – 16 April 2016 by  GeorgeGreekTrucker

 

See all 120+ posts from Carol Woods since Feb. 2016 – https://butlincat.com/?s=carol+woods

————————-

FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

NB: DISCLAIMER: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

OUTRAGEOUS: “The DWP has admitted 21,000 people died waiting for benefits” – 21 Jan. ’19 + archive

The DWP has admitted 21,000 people died waiting for benefits

.

  
.

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has revealed that over 21,000 sick and disabled people died waiting for it to give them benefits. That’s nearly 12 people a day dying, waiting for a decision over their claims.

But these shocking figures pose more questions than they answer.

The DWP: shocking revelations

DWP minister Sarah Newton published the figures in response to an MP’s question. Labour’s Madeleine Moon asked: 

how many people have died while waiting for their personal independence payment assessment to be completed; and what conditions those people died from.

Newton revealed the number of deaths between April 2013 and 30 April 2018. She said:

  • 4,760 claimants died between the DWP referring their case to, and it returning from, an assessment provider.
  • 73,800 claimants died within 6 months of registering their claim.
  • 17,070 claimants died after registering but prior to the DWP making a decision on their claim.

The total number of PIP claimants who died topped 95,000. But Newton’s response does not indicate at what stage of their claim the 73,800 people who died within six months of it being registered were at.

Samuel Miller alerted The Canary to the figures. He tweeted Newton’s statement:

The cause of death of PIP claimants is not collated centrally by the Department.
Over 3.6 million applications to PIP were made between April 2013 and 30th April 2018. Of these:

The PIP

Personal Independence Payment (PIP) is a benefit for sick and disabled people. The DWP gives it to them to cover the extra costs of their impairments or health condition.

As Newton said in her statement, PIP: 

is claimed by people with a range of health conditions and disabilities, many of which are degenerative or life limiting. 

This is unpublished data… It should be used with caution and it may be subject to future revision.

So it would be wrong to say that the DWP was responsible for these deaths. But the figures pose worrying questions about its procedures and its efficiency. Because Newton also released the claimants’ main conditions / impairments. They show her department left some seriously ill people waiting for their benefits.

Worrying deaths

For example, of the 17,070 people who died before the DWP made a decision about their PIP:

  • 4,760 had cancer.
  • 270 had anxiety and/or depressive disorders.
  • 40 had motor neurone disease.

Major questions

These figures pose some serious questions for the DWP:

  • Why were people dying whose main condition was non-terminal?
  • Why did it take it so long to process nearly 5,000 cancer patients’ claims?
  • Likewise with motor neurone disease?
  • Also, what did the people whose main condition was mental health-related die of? And did DWP processes play a part in any worsening of their mental health issues?

9,020 people lost

But there’s also a big question over the 9,020 people whose main condition the DWP didn’t record. It’s worrying that nearly five people a day died waiting for PIP and yet it has no record of their main condition.

Because the DWP does not centrally collate causes of deaths, we have no idea either whether a claimant’s main, unrecorded condition killed them, or something else.

So, if ‘something else’ killed them, did the DWP and government actions play a part? Was stress a factor in some people’s deaths? Did poverty and / or austerity have negative health effects? Did any of these people take their own lives? Because we have repeatedly been here before.

The DWP says…

The Canary asked the DWP for comment. We specifically asked it the questions in this article. Also, we queried why it did not have records of 9,020 claimants’ main condition / impairment. But it had not responded at the time of publication.

A “damning indictment”

The figures, though, shocked lawyer and campaigner Peter Stefanovic. He told The Canary:

 For tens of thousands to have died whilst waiting for their PIP claim to be finalised is a damning indictment of DWP policy and failure. These are our mothers and fathers, our sons and daughters, our brothers and sisters, whose final days on this earth have been marred by stress and worry and anxiety.

 By allowing this country to be run by a cruel Victorian government, a government that lacks all compassion, that lacks all integrity, that has no conscience or decency, we must all share in this shame. So, it must be a wakeup call; another way is possible. Because if we stand together in the coming months, if we do what needs to be done, everything can change, everything.

The DWP is not fit for purpose. Nothing short of root and branch change by a different government will now do.

sourcehttps://www.thecanary.co/trending/2019/01/14/the-dwp-has-admitted-21000-people-died-waiting-for-benefits/

See the DWP archive

https://butlincat.com/?s=DWP

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Maurice Kirk: “28th Jan Police Machine-gun Fraud in Cardiff County Court” 18 Jan. 2019 + archive

28th Jan Police Machine-gun Fraud in Cardiff County Court

Clerk of the Court Cases no BS614159etc  &  County Court 
Cardiff 1CF03361/D00CF279

 18th January 2019                                                                                                                                                                    Maurice Kirk v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police

  Claimant’s Attempts to Appeal

  1. This week, after a dubious 10 year-ban, the claimant was allowed to attend your public counter in order to try and establish, at last, the actual ‘audit trail’ of the above joined cases. The BS case started in 1993 for an English court and on the strict understanding the claimant was given a jury and relevant police disclosure of the facts. He was denied all these things
  • His 1993 Cardiff imprisonment, on the pretext he was ‘unidentifiable’, was whilst charged for being in possession of a ‘garrotte’ type wire just used on The Prince of Wales’s farm. This triggered a Guernsey police call where the claimant had recently practiced veterinary surgery but described as both ‘extremely dangerous and likely to try and escape’.
  • Incidents, since 1993, exceed 100 with, by way of example, had caused the claimant to stop 7 times to ‘produce driving documents’. Despite his blunt refusal no convictions were achieved.
  • On 1st Dec 2011 the claimant was convicted of harassment in quite bizarre circumstances but never given or told of a ‘restraining order’ to ‘protect’ a police doctor. The defendant had told the 2nd Dec 2009 Crown Court the claimant had ‘significant brain damage’ and PDD, paranoid delusional disorder as he believed he was the subject of police persecution! The defendant had concocted the application for his adversary to be incarcerated in Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital, for life, as BS disclosure of facts was now imminent in Jan 2010 civil court.
  • The BS cases covered 40 odd failed police malicious prosecutions and the start of decades of failed police disclosure (MG6D) of relevant evidence despite court orders to the contrary.
  • The defendant had complained, backed with false evidence, to have the claimant deprived of his veterinary income since 2004 and had caused his 4 years in gaol by an act of fraud. Its erroneous medical report was also to avoid the doomed Jan 2010 ‘trading in machine guns’ trial. The defendant’s unblocking of the decommissioned WW1 Lewis barrel and painting her a different colour, to try and fool the jury, was, with sex changed ‘Foxy’, also criminal conduct.
  • The ‘handing down’ of the 2013 judgment was not ‘court sealed’ for a further unexplained 16 months despite it having been taken to the Appeal Court office within the statutory 21 days. Why the ‘appeal’ was returned to Cardiff for a further 3 years remains a complete mystery. The defendant has orchestrated false forensic history, not just to MAPPA register the claimant but to obtain more than 2 million pounds in costs by delaying the claimant’s right to justice.
  • The Claimant is only now aware that his request to appeal was ‘struck out’ in 2017 and the ‘sensitive’ tape of the claimant’s 1993 police interview, hidden until 2016, will not be disclosed so he again applies for both BS transcript and list of exhibits disclosure. He again asks for ‘print out’ of the court’s ‘audit trail of events’ referred to, off screen, during his 4 visits this week.

It stinks, does it not? Copy to Secretary of State for Wales   

source: https://mauricejohnkirk.com/2019/01/18/14382/

Archive: Maurice served a highly questionable 2 year sentence, beginning on 14/12/2017 in HMP Parc, Bridgend, Wales, and now released – the archive of posts here with MK’s updates from 2011:

 https://butlincat.com/?s=maurice+kirk

Maurice’s site is http://www.mauricejohnkirk.com

his email address is: maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

A typical post from Febuary 2018 which shows the chronic indifference shown towards an inmate in the care of the prison system who needs vital medication but never gets it whilst in HMP Parc:

MAURICE KIRK: OUTRAGEOUS: STILL DENIED VITAL MEDICATIONS AND HOSPITAL APPOINTMENTS AND MORE IN HMP PARC + archive 06 Feb. 2018

Maurice Kirk is serving a 2 year sentence in HMP Parc because, it is deemed, he breached a restraining order that was never served on him in the first place according to UK law [see previous updates regarding the scandal surrounding this entire subject].

A letter dated 1st Febuary was received today from Maurice – still on hunger strike in HMP Parc. In the letter are described the continuing serious irregularities performed by the HMP Parc prison service, perhaps the most serious being vital medications are still denied Maurice, [which have been denied him for “7 weeks” he states], and also vital hospital appointments are still denied him. Regarding the medications being denied, which must be taken immediately before food is taken in order for them to be effective [he has a probable “split diaphragm” in his stomach, + other serious ailments], the prison continues to deny him his prescribed medication – a basic human right that the prison are obliged to follow, but communications to UK and Welsh government agencies concerning this glaring breach of Maurice’s Human Rights [and also the breach of this prison’s own guidelines] by many UK citizens prove futile and ignored. Maurice remarks in his latest communication that the bizarre excuse was used by the prison staff that they had actually “lost” the container that the medications were stored in, thus denying him yet again his medication, but when they find it they will dispense it to him – a promise that wasn’t kept!

Maurice writes also that:

he has locked in his cell  for 24 hrs / day, and been denied post “for 5 days”!

On going to the room allocated for the dispensing of medications to inmates, he was denied his medication yet again, Maurice states that he is “on report” for the 2nd time for not leaving the ground floor door of the medical room where there is a hatch where the medications are dispensed to inmates. Being “on report” and being found “guilty” by the prison authorities will cause an inmate to be punished. eg. to lose his canteen, or other similar restrictions that are deemed “priveleges” by the prison service. Maurice states that this is the “2nd time” he has been placed “on report”.

He has it confirmed “in writing” from the prison that he is indeed registered a “MAPPA 3, Cat. 3” subject, after it was reported that this allocation was said to have been abandoned in years past. However, the reasons for such an serious registration being in place now has not been explained in any form by anyone he’s contacted and asked – within the prison or outside of it – another glaring breach of Maurice’s rights. Perhaps any UK or Welsh government agency will not concede the fact that this allocation of Maurice being a MAPPA subject was already abandoned some time ago –  and why will noone answer Maurice’s question to them asking why he is subjected to this registration? The governments and its agencies are obliged to inform any subject the reasoning for any MAPPA registration. But not for Maurice, it seems!

Maurice writes that he has been denied his prison canteen “for 2 weeks”, meaning stamps are denied him for the sending of letters – which means he is denied sending many letters to court officials and authority figures regarding this present term of most questionable imprisonment, along with numerous other miscarriages of justice performed in the past that have been forced upon him, including letters regarding his MAPPA registration, of course. Naturally the governments know this present and entire conviction and it’s resulting term of 2 years imprisonment imposed on Maurice is riddled with errors and flaws and legal irregularities, thus anything to deny him writing to anyone in order to try and attempt justice regarding the inhuman and barbaric tortures imposed and being imposed upon him at present. Maurice had 30+ legal cases ongoing against mostly Welsh authorities, especially the S. Welsh police, those cases being blocked now because of  completely erroneous reasons concocted by the same authorities complained of in order that justice cannot be done. Since 2009 Maurice, 72, has served over 6 years in prison – each term on the most highly questionable of grounds, eg. in the past Maurice has been locked up for months on end on remand in a Welsh prison, before being released with the charges all being mysteriously dropped – with no compensation or proper explanation ever being given to him regarding the loss of these 6+ years of his life spent behind bars for no good reason. Such is the Welsh legal system regarding Maurice Kirk, who’s only “fault” is to try and show the utter deceit and dishonesty flourishing within the Welsh police and connected agencies. It is truly a disgrace and a public scandal that has blighted Maurice’s life for over 23 years – and it is still ongoing in HMP Parc!

continues at https://butlincat.com/2018/02/07/maurice-kirk-outrageous-still-denied-vital-medications-and-hospital-appointments-and-more-in-hmp-parc-archive-06-feb-2018/

below: from 2013:

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Carol Woods: Who is Carol Woods? the targeting continues + archive videos 15 Jan 2019

“MONDAY, 5 FEBRUARY 2007

York LGO Blog and Lancashire CC  by Carol Woods

.

On 15th Dec 2000 when I was employed as a social worker for Lancashire County Council (LCC) I attended a meeting of staff, clients, their families etc, subject: home closures on a site known as Fylde Comunity School near Blackpool, Lancs.

Hilton Dawson, then MP for Lancaster, Fylde and Wyre attended as did the LCC Consultant, Ed Nixon. The staff union involved, UNISON, declined to send a rep.
The meeting was well attended but astonishingly I was the only field social worker in attendance.
Some in LCC planned to seize 134 acres of land, evict families from their homes on that site telling them they had no tenants’ rights, close a working farm, a full time school, dismiss 46 staff members illegally and close 4 homes for disturbed adolescent boys.
I said in that meeting, “You can’t do that” and I was taken to one side and told, “You’re right, keep quiet, or else”.
That was later sent to me via senior managers in a letter.

Hilton Dawson as my MP ignored my pleas for help.

I followed all the proper procedures and policies for complaining within LCC (I had 4 clients on that site who had nowhere else to live if it closed as it was doing, ad hoc and illegally. Then boys were all in care to the Local Authority as were all other boys on site, approx. 100). LCC had no foster carers or field support workers and on 21 April 01 I wrote to the Social Services Committee warning that something would happen if the boys were evicted into the community unmonitored.

LCC whistle blowing contact, Clive Giddings, had told me I would be disciplined and sacked for gross misconduct if I continued to complain about the Fylde closure.
My protected disclosure was not protected.

I finally surrendered my post at the end of Aug 01 after being bullied etc for 8 months by management intent on forcing me out on instruction from HQ Preston. Tony Bradhsaw, Pat Allen and Gillian Armstrong were the worst offenders then acting on instruction from David Fairclough, then Head of Human Resources for LCC.

On 30th June 01 my predictaion as to a serious evenmt happened. 2 of the boys from Fylde discharged into the community where no one knew where they were, had recruited a teenaged gang and murdered a pensioner, Sheila Bridge. (see Internet)
I ha dtaken my complaint to the LGO, York office and was assigned an investigator, Roger Barham. We got on well and sometimes just chatted on the phone. LCC had told him that they would not submit documents if he was to send them to me. R Barham said that the Sec of State would ensure their compliance. I eventually got the documents.

I was to analyse the evidence in the documents and compile a report which I did.
By then I had discovered that Ed Nixon had lied to all staff, clients and their families in the “Consultation”. He had said in a letter to all, “I am Director of Atlantic Children’s Trust. I am independent and impartial”.
E Nixon was a friend of senior manager, Sue Mitchell and Tony Morrissey (both child care) and was unemployed which is why they recruited him.
Also, I checked with Companies House. His company did not exist; he had bought the name from the Exchange and Mart. (False CV at least, criminal offence.)
D Fairclough as Head of Human Resources had compiled the letter with Bob Gower, another senior child care manager in HQ for Ed Nixon to send out. They knew what they were doing. Naturally I have all that in writing as I ahve every last document referred to in this.

I concnetrated my report on points of law, Local Government Law and human rights etc and noted Case Law.
R Barham was encouraging, he rang saying he couldn’t help me write my report but could say whether I was on the right track or not.
I told him what I was concentrating on and he said we’d get LCC for maladministration at least.

I was pleased with my report. It was 12 pages handwritten then, since typed for clarity, and I submitted it early Sept 01 but heard nothing.
At the end on Oct 01 I received a card from R Barham saying that pressure of work prevented him dealing with the case.
On Christmas Eve of 2001 I received a letter from R Barham, no report, and it was nothing like he’d ever written to me previously. It was almost 5 years later that I learned he had not written that letter (report, call it what you will), Ian Young of LCC legal dept had written it for him, Barham had simply signed it.

In May 2002 I discovered that the March 01 Committee Meeting Minutes for LCC had been altered in that month of May 02. They then included the legal recommendations I had said they should have made re Fylde. They were rewritten to allow senior managers to distance themsleves from the corporate manslaughter of Mrs Bridge.
(My letter to Ian Fisher Head of Legal dept LCC saying they should be charged with corporate manslaughter started a whole new aspect to this, anyone can aske what that was.)

In July 2002 I discovered, after a court ordered release of files to me, some children’s files had been altered by P Allen, T Bradshaw and G Armstrong to try and discredit my work as a social worker (child protection.) The altered files were detrimental to the familes and children as well as me.
The LGO investigator, Colin Oxley, chum of R Barham did nothing although I reported the Minutes and the files issues.
The children were all minors and had no one to speak for them.
In 2002 I had learned of Judicial Reviews and applied to the High Court. Judge Hooper gave me permission for an oral hearing which would have been heard July 2002.
He said he couldn’t order the re-opening but he could order a proper investigation into the closures, sackings, evictions etc.

I was actively prevented from attending that oral hearing.
And that’s when the corruption was further compunded and continues to be so today. Feb 5th 2007.

Readers can know what I didn’t know until the end of 2002 and that was , “Who was legal advisor for LCC on those closures leading to corporate manslaughter? Cherie Blair.

In 2003 I also had cogent evidence that Pat Allen for LCC worked with a false CV and swore in Family Courts High Division that she had qualifications that did not exist. Perjury to pervert the course of justice for vulnerable families.
P Allen had been a cleaner in a children’s home and had sexual relations with senior manager, including D Fairclough hence her rapid rise through to management when she could scarcely write her name and address.
The LGO in York ignored all that cogent evidence.
But the Ombudsman at the time until Sept 05) was Pauline Thomas.
I traced Mrs Thomas in June 06 (she retired in Sept 05) and she agreed to see me. (I was suitably vague in my letters).
Mrs Thomas knew nothing about Fylde or the children’s files or the Committee Meeting Minutes.

R Barham had conspired to pervert the course of justice with Fishger and Young at least from LCC. Was he paid to do that? He will not deny it. PAYOLA. Usual for LCC.
The Director of the time, Pauline Oliver was advised to take early retirement in 2002 which she did to protect her pension.

Anne Seex succeeded Mrs Thomas and much is known about Mrs Seex.
But I know something else. Our paths crossed on a personal matter in 1998. She did not win.

Hilton Dawson resigned as MP for Lancaster and Anne Sacks quietly slipped into his place. She lost in the election.
Judy Deering, solicitor for LCC working on the perjury with P Allen was advised to take early retirement in 2003 when it became known that I knew that she was also woprking as a bar manager in a night club in Bolton, (Temple Bar) in breach of her contract for LCC.
P Allen is well protected. She would undoubtedly seek revenge if ‘allowed to go’.

The land was seized illegally, all 134 acres of it. The Freemasons were involved: greed, money, land grabbing, corrupt police and murder. Traits of those in that silly boys’ club.

Every last statement of fact as above can be proven via documentary evidence. It is still safe despite collective attempts to take it from me. All public interest.

Carol Woods Lancaster.

Carol Woods: some background / videos / archive:

Carol Woods = “It is a highly complex matter which the police organise where they try to make me someone I am not. They have in fact tried to invent me as the reverse of myself using numerous characters, including “neighbours” who live alongside myself, and others elsewhere – the entire situations going back years. I find things out because I am not stupid. See my original w’blowing blog York LGO Blog re Lancashire CC   http://criticalreader2006.blogspot.aeyou will see why I am hounded by lowlife RECRUITED to do that by the Gestapo. 

More is described here:   “Harassment as punishment for whistle-blowing: Lancashire” http://criticalreader17.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/

and see below, under the posts, “Some Background to Carol Wood’s being severely harassed, and the longrunning and almost infinite crimes committed in her name which include mass ID fraud, and just some of what she has had to endure since 2001, including the theft of her house [total value £400,000]. Also below are the informative videos of interviews with Carol, which detail much of what she discovered whilst employed by Lancs. Co. Council as a top social worker, and since 2006, including the Brian Gerrish UK Column video, also shown here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3noOtwoNo4Q

See the 130+ post archive from Carol Woods since Feb. 2016 – https://butlincat.com/?s=carol+woods


Why will no one sort this massive corruption out?

Apart from the other serious crimes connected to Carol Woods case[s], which include disappeared elderly ladies, treason, murder and attempted murder [and so much more] the monetary value alone of the ID frauds using Carol’s name, and variations of her name [“Carol” with an “e” added – as in “Carole Woods”, or a “Carol Woodes”, or even a “Mr. Carol Woods” etc.] must run now into hundreds of thousands of GB pounds – all at the UK taxpayers expense. Carol Wood’s ID has been gleaned so many times from, it is very strongly alleged, deliberately misdelivered Royal Mail meant for Carol, misdelivered to criminal neighbours who, amongst other felons involved in the overall targeting, reap the gains of these ID frauds in one form or other – one form being receiving luxury goods, including cars. Cars, for example, are driven by local yobs when stalking Carol in her car [which has a GPS tracking device in it placed there by an Oldham garage under instructions from, it is very strongly alleged – Lancs. police. Please see the posts on this tracking device which manages to be exempt from Data Protection Act laws, and also E.C.H.R. Article 8 rules [the right to a “private and family life, his home and his correspondence”]: THE ILLEGAL GPS TRACKING DEVICE IN CAROL WOOD’S CAR – WHY A LANCS. “COVERT POLICE OPERATION”? CAROL WOODS IS NOT A CRIMINAL – 21 April 2018 + archive

How many cars have been “given” to these criminals alone so as they can harass – and even attempt to kill –  Carol when she has been out driving her car? And what else has been given to the huge number of criminals involved in this massive example of organised crime? 

The posts here, copied from Ms. Wood’s communications, detail numerous serious crimes, and outrageous hostilities happening to Carol Woods which continue to this day – the archive made of scores of posts beginning in Febuary 2016 after certain “supporters” found out Carol had been placed in a closed mental hospital unit for the 5th [at least] time for no reason. On January 31st 2018 Carol was arrested by Lancs. police for being myself –  the owner of this site – for allegedly posting articles here – a nonsense charge easily negated by my affadavit / statement as sent to Lancs. police [the statement can be seen in the recent related post put here recently], but nevertheless this unwarranted arrest causing unnecessary hassle and more grief for Carol – the point of the exercise, probably. Carol has been falsely convicted in the past on fake charges. 

Who is Carol Woods?:

Carol Woods is a former Lancashire County Council Level 3 Social Worker and Child Protection Officer [who used to train social workers] and a former Probation Officer, amongst many other things. Perhaps the appalling and chronic targeting she has no choice but to put up with 24/7 is because she reported numerous seriously grave irregularities she discovered, including child abuse, when being employed by Lancashire county council, and when one realises that the very controllers of the targeting and stalking Carol is forced to endure are, very probably, very closely connected to the same departments and personnel who are described in the links above and the “IMPORTANT VIDEOS” shown below, which detail what was discovered when Carol worked as a Child Protection officer in Lancashire, then it should not be hard to understand these hostilities enacted against her. Put it this way: the Welsh scientist, weapons expert and authority on biological warfare, employed by the British Ministry of Defence David Kelly was supposed to have leaked serious information to the detriment of the PTB at the time – look what happened to him. Now, Carol is no weapons expert, but one doesn’t have to be one to upset the proverbial apple cart bigtime. And anyway, we are told there have been assassination attempts upon her life too – quite a few in fact, including ramming her car at speed, on a main road, by perpetrators unknown…well, almost unknown.

And why is there an illegal tracking device installed in Ms. Woods car – put there, apparently – by Lancs. police? The Chief Constable of Lancashire has been written to so many times about so many serious matters with no response it’s quite remarkable. Another 2 chief constables have been written to asking can serious crime be reported to their forces also with no response whatsoever, and I have tried on more than one occasion to notify my local police about serious crime at my local central police station to be totally ignored every visit, which is just another public scandal!

Many more serious crimes and misdemeanours committed against Ms. Woods are all completely ignored by whichever UK government agency one tries to take anything to, including:

treason,

many murder attempts upon Carol,

impersonation, ID frauds,

person[s] impersonating police officers in official government hearings, [or hearing[s]  purporting to be official],

Royal Mail frauds,

monetary frauds involving: dubious bank accounts at numerous high street banks, the DWP, Social Security, town council[s] and other agencies,

illegal tracking of motor vehicle via GPS device [or similar],

a high number of motor vehicle “Blue Badge” [UK HM Government concession] frauds,

regular physical harassment / mental torture upon a person [aka “gangstalking”],

telephone / Internet Broadband  / electricity supply fraud,

wrongful arrest,

wrongful kidnapping[s] / incarceration[s] in UK HM Government units, police station[s], HM Prison[s] etc.,

home burglaries, car vandalism going uninvestigated by local police  

– many other instances of serious crime and illegal activity exist, and many acts contravening not only the Data Protection Act 1998, but also the contravention of articles pertaining to the European Commission of Human Rights [particularly Article 8].

What is going on is maybe unbelievable, and at times complicated, but that is surely deliberate and part of this outrageous targeting of a law-abiding citizen  – a lone female – who dared to report serious irregularities she found during her employment as a Level 3 social worker and Child Protection Officer. As a result, apart from the crimes committed against her as described, her house and contents with a value of £400,000+ was stolen from her, and her employment tribunal award of £50,000 found its way to someone who conspired against her who fraudulently took Carol Wood’s ID. Other serious crimes exist and continue to  this very day…

IMPORTANT VIDEOS:

 1] PLAYLIST [3 videos]: EXPOSING FAKE SOCIAL WORKERS ETC. 06 Febuary 2016

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCT5hwoao38ThHG5Y6q3GSp_hsTwMK2UD

2] Please listen to this vital radio show interview with Ms. Woods from the 12 March 2016

http://www.mixcloud.com/TheFreedomTalkRadioNetwork/lancashire-greater-manchester-harrow-councils-cops-crime-coruption-carol-woods-whistleblower/

3] CAROL WOODS WHISTLEBLOWER ON RADIO lancashire police corruption county council 06 Febuary 2016

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/freedomtalkradioscotland/2016/02/21/andys-sunday-night-show-with-guest

4] CRIMINAL BRITAIN

 SriLankerC 24 April 2016

5] Interview by torquaytalkeytv  31 March 16

6] Carol Woods Social Worker Unlawfully Incarcerated In Psychiatric Gulag  https://youtu.be/-sMukHhkl4o   – 16 April 2016 by  GeorgeGreekTrucker

 

See all 130+ posts from Carol Woods since Feb. 2016 – https://butlincat.com/?s=carol+woods

————————-

FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use. 
 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit: 
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

NB: DISCLAIMER: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Melanie Shaw update: court report 14 Jan. 2019

from  facebook’s Justice for Melanie Shaw group
  Denyse Walker  

Report from Leeds Crown Court Monday 14 January 2019.

13 supporters waited around 90 minutes for other cases to be heard then Melanie’s case was called at 11:30. 10 seats only were available in the public gallery of court 10.
Judge Penelope Belcher began proceedings by informing the court that Melanie was to be admitted to Rampton on Wednesday, by which we assume she meant 16th January, via Section 48. We don’t know where she is now, but it seems likely therefore that she is still in HMP Styal. 

Judge Belcher declared herself not a psychiatrist, but did not necessarily agree with the Dr. , who had merely sent in an email to the court, which the Judge said was not acceptable, she needed a report, on the Mental Health Act category, suggesting a Section 37 might see Melanie treated then discharged under a supervision order. 

She spoke at some length with Melanie’s barrister and asked that legal aid funding be applied for so that 2 more doctors reports could be provided to assist her in reaching her decision. According to the 1st Dr, Melanie has an urgent condition, described as a personality disorder. 

Judge Belcher remarked that she had received more correspondence asking for justice for Melanie (I wonder who sent that 😉?) and that she had read it, as she had promised to, but would not be influenced by it. She only ever reached a verdict on the evidence she said, Mr Rafiq agreed she was scrupulous in this regard. 

Judge Belcher then adjourned the case until 11 February, reserving it for herself again, stating that the additional reports were required for a hospital order and this Dr. could not hide behind Sec 48, and Mel must otherwise be released into the community.

Another trip to Leeds then on 11/2/19.
Please support Melanie if you can. [ends]

from:  https://www.facebook.com/groups/302194089973223/?multi_permalinks=1028077287384896&notif_id=1547371144069295&notif_t=group_highlights

The “Nottingham Post” article 14/01/2019:

Melanie Shaw arson sentencing is adjourned for another month

https://www.nottinghampost.com/news/local-news/melanie-shaw-arson-sentencing-adjourned-2426844?fbclid=IwAR1lyd-69nVqJGTEb2TbooadksJ7FonQQDZFbTKLjETGwd9hqPILI4jdakw

.
See the Melanie Shaw archive:
.
https://butlincat.com/?s=melanie+shaw

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Former Met police whistleblower Jon Wedger meets Penning and Hurd over the Government child abuse scandal + full 50 min. survivor interview 14 Jan. 2019 VIDEOs

From the “Justice for Melanie Shaw” facebook group:

Vanessa Siveyer 

“This is an update on the progress in the investigations of an establishment cover-up of child sexual abuse
Earlier this week I went along to a meeting with Jon Wedger ( former Scotland Yard Detective )to meet with Sir Mike Penning ( former Minister of State for the Armed Forces and Nick Hurd ( Policing Minister of state ) at Parliament
In 2016 Jon had a meeting with members of parliament and handed over files about child abuse cover ups, to then be told that no one saw him and the paper work had gone missing, they lied to Sir Mike Penning and soon after Sir Mike Penning was removed from his position, since backing Jon Wedger

The meeting this week was to address the above – on child sexual abuse cover ups and missing papers etc
The meeting appeared to be very positive, both Sir Mike Penning and Nick Hurd seemed genuinely concerned and humble.
Nick Hurd promised to open up an investigation into the police managers. Home Office will be questioned as to why the paper work went missing. We are also relying on other members to come up with answers. So let’s see what happens.
.
68,402 Views
They are starting to listen…
Ex Scotland Yard detective campaigning to expose an establishment cover up of child abuse…
please please share… our six month update and an important meeting Sir Mike Penning “[ends]
.
See the Melanie Shaw archive:
.
https://butlincat.com/?s=melanie+shaw
.

related:

.

WATCH: FULL 50 MIN. VIDEO = EX-POLICE WHISTLEBLOWER JON WEDGER interviews a former victim of child prostitution which the Establishment tries to cover up endlessly

A victim of horrific child abuse from London during the 1950’s and 60’s.

#childabuse #Anonymous #grooming #JonWedger #Piccadilly #ACPO #Raging @ukhomeoffice @NCA_UK

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Hampstead SRA: Belinda McKenzie verdict – Southwark Cn. Court 11 Jan 2019 + archive

“McKenzie found guilty of contempt and given a six months suspended and banned from discussing the [Hampstead SRA] case for life”.

 

 

 

The archive here on the Hampstead SRA, with interview videos with the tortured family:

https://butlincat.com/?s=hampstead+sra

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Outrageous newspaper rag reports on Sabine Mcneil’s scandalous 9 year jailing 11 Jan. 2019 + Hampstead SRA archive

‘UK’s worst troll’ claimed London school was centre of baby-eating satanic cult – Telegraph

Sabine McNeill at court

An “evil” troll who claimed a primary school in Hampstead, north London, was at the centre of a satanic cult that cooked babies and ate them has been jailed for nine years.

Sabine McNeill’s actions forced innocent children to change their names, carry tracking devices and practise panic drills, a court heard.

The 74-year-old, described as one of the UK’s worst trolls, perpetuated “baseless” allegations about families whose lives had been “ruined”.

Southwark Crown Court heard that McNeill had led a campaign to uncover claims of devil worship, child rape and murder at the school, harassing four mothers who now live in fear of violent reprisals.

Judge Sally Cahill, QC told the weeping pensioner: “This case has to be one of the most serious cases of stalking and breach of a restraining order that there can be.

“The direct consequences of your actions, is that for the four families concerned you have ruined all normal family life.

“The allegations were of murder, cannibalism, satanism and sexual abuse. They could not be more serious or vile.

“The children’s lives have been blighted forever. In my judgment you are an arrogant, malicious, evil and manipulative woman.”

Material relating to two children who claimed that they had been abused by paedophiles and were part of a satanic cult was “published and re-published widely” on the internet, the court heard.

When police investigated, they concluded that the claims were “utter nonsense” and that the children, aged eight and nine, had been tortured into concocting accounts of “horrific events” by their mother and her partner.

Photographs, film clips and personal information relating to both children were uploaded online and viewed by more than four million people, causing them “incalculable” harm as campaigners sought to expose the non-existent cult.

The father of the two children was falsely accused of being the leader of the cult, whose members were said to include a school head, a teacher, priest, social workers and police.

The judge criticised those who had republished and circulated the claims “with flagrant disregard” for the welfare of the children,” irrespective of whether or not they were true.

McNeill, from Camden, north London, was convicted of four counts of harassment and six counts of breaching a restraining order.

Miranda Moore, prosecuting, had told the jury she was “an online troll of the worst kind, making the lives of innocent families a misery”.

source: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/10/evil-troll-claimed-london-school-centre-satanic-cult-jailed/

Online troll Sabine McNeill who accused parents of satanic sex abuse jailed for 9 years – The Times

Sabine McNeill claimed that mothers were members of a cult who cooked and ate babies
Sabine McNeill claimed that mothers were members of a cult who cooked and ate babies

A woman described as “an online troll of the worst kind” has been jailed for falsely accusing primary school parents of satanic abuse and cannibalism.

Sabine McNeill, 74, led a campaign to uncover baseless devil worship and child abuse at a primary school in Hampstead, northwest London.

She harassed four mothers, who cannot be named, claiming they were members of a cult who cooked and ate babies. She also made allegations of murder, Southwark crown court heard.

It forced the parents to take their children out of school and use fake names, tracking devices and panic alarms. The jury was told that one parent was approached online by a paedophile looking to abuse her child.

Police put the families under “special measures”, which included planning…

but who in their right mind would pay to read more lies?

sourcehttps://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/online-troll-sabine-mcneill-who-accused-parents-of-satanic-sex-abuse-jailed-for-9-years-mq2rfzgfz

Pensioner who claimed parents were part of satanic cult is jailed – D. Mail

Pensioner, 74, who claimed parents were abusing their children as part of a satanic cult which drank babies’ blood and cooked youngsters in secret room in McDonald’s is jailed for nine years

more: 

Woman who claimed there was a ‘satanic abuse ring’ in Hampstead jailed for stalking and harassing parents

https://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/crime-court/nine-years-for-pensioner-who-has-stalked-and-harrassed-mothers-of-children-at-hampstead-school-1-5848299

Hampstead Satanic Ritual Abuse Hoaxer Sabine McNeill Convicted ...

 https://barthsnotes.com/…/hampstead-satanic-ritual-abuse-hoaxer-sabine-mcneill-convi…

.
17 Dec 2018 – A pensioner who accused innocent parents of organising a Satanic child abuse cult is facing jailSabine McNeill, 74, claimed she had …
.

Hampstead SRA ARCHIVE:

Hampstead SRA: Sabine Mcneil was sentenced to 9 years at Southwark CC this afternoon 09 Jan. 2018 + archive

Sabine Mcneil was sentenced to 9 years at Southwark CC this afternoon.

I have been told that “Belinda McKenzie’s case will be heard on Thursday 10 Jan. 2019″ Friday 11 Jan. 2019  – subject to confirmation.

bm2

See the  archive post on SM’s arrest in Dec. 2017 here:

 https://butlincat.com/?s=hampstead+sra

more soon…

The Arrest: Sabine Mcneil remanded in custody – 09 Dec. 17

Received: 09 Dec. 17: “Sabine Mcneil, remanded to Bronzefield Prison. Hopefully by Monday the bail will be met and we can get her out. “. She next appears at Southwark Crown Court on 5th January. She has been charged with further … Continue reading 

Hampstead SRA: Sabine Mcneil Trial: “Pensioner, 74, ‘made lives of innocent families a misery…” etc DAILY MAIL – 27 Nov. 2018 + archive

This, below, from a major UK tabloid is sadly lacking so much of the true facts regarding the entire Hampstead SRA [Satanic Ritual Abuse] case which began to be reported publicly during 2015, before going viral with many arrests [n.b.: … Continue reading 

The Hampstead SRA archive is here, with interviews with the children’s parents, and more, as recorded at the time

https://butlincat.com/?s=hampstead+sra

from the archive earlier:

HAMPSTEAD SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE: “ANATOMY OF A COVERUP” – based on The IPCC Appeal document  01 June + Ella interviews


!. ELLA ABEReceived 01/06/16:

“This is based on The IPCC Appeal document and we would encourage supporters to contact the IPCC with thoughts or something along those lines.

ANATOMY of a COVER UP

What exactly did the medical reports state?

The police initially attempted to undermine the findings of Dr Hodes and now state that they never received the reports until January 2015 and therefore were not aware of it’s findings. Is it feasible that the findings of a police instructed doctor are not communicated to the police? The police were fully aware of the contents of the medical reports and the conclusive findings. To understand the position of the police, it is important to know what is contained within the reports as that would explain why it is necessary for the police to keep their position of undermining / ignoring the findings and stating that they did not receive the reports until January 2015, as it did not support their “investigation” strategy.

The examinations of the children by Dr Hodes were on 15th and 16th September 2014, after the children were kidnapped /taken into police custody. During the police “investigation”, Dr Hodes prepared 3 reports dated 15th, 16th and 22nd September respectively.

Conclusion of reports dated 15th September 2014, examination date 12th September 2014.

Both the reports dated 15th September 2014 are addressed to a Chantelle Stevens of Family Services and Social work. The fifth and final page of both reports has an address blacked out. This is the address of the police and the name of the person this report was sent to in the police department. The police have claimed that they did not receive this report until January 2015 .

The medical report states;

“(G) In both the general physical examinations of G today, there are physical signs that are consistent with the allegations given by both G and A. The scar in the anus is from a healed fissure, secondary to the application of a blunt penetrating force that he has alleged. In summary, G has physical signs that support his allegations of both physical and sexual abuse”

“In general physical and genital examination of A today, there was evidence of findings consistent with the allegations given by A. These were of inflicted physical injury – physical abuse and insertion of a blunt penetrating instruments into her anus. The scars in her anus are from healed fissures, secondary to the application of a blunt penetrating force that she has alleged”

Report dated 16th September 2014, examination date 16th September 2014.

This report, drafted after Dr Hodes attended strategy meetings on 8th and 15th September 2014, has details of how both children have been repeating their allegations to the foster carers. Upon seeing Vaseline in a shop, G says “is that what they put on my bottom” referring to abuse “from their dad and his friends including Mr. Hollings“

Within the report;

‘A’ described a ‘plastic willy’ to the foster carer and that their ‘dad makes them in his shed’.

‘A’ describes how “’Vaseline original’ in a square container was used on their ‘bottoms and willies’” and sometimes they inserted “plastic willies in her bottom” but sometimes “real willies”. Both children said it hurt less with real willies but that the perpetrators wanted it to hurt them so they used a plastic willy”.

“They also said that they did not want it to hurt so much that it scarred otherwise their mother might discover this when she bathed them” This suggests that the perpetrators took active measures to ensure that the abuse was kept secret and hidden from the mother, Ella Gareeva.

“They both experienced bleeding from their bottoms afterwards…given a wet tissue to wipe it with. They described how they wiped blood or sometimes ‘white stuff’ that came from willies’.

“When asked why they did not tell their mother whilst this was happening, they said they were too scared as their father had told them that he would kill their whole family if they told”

The report describes how the children have nightmares of their “dad killing them” and G said “that he suddenly remembers what happened and his eyes go blurry. He then sees monsters and if he closes his eyes he sees ‘a picture of his dad killing him”. We cannot begin to imagine the amount of pain and fear G must have been going through when he was hoping that the “good policeman” would believe him and his sister.

“G described that when he stayed at his dad’s house for two or three days
his dad did not let him go to sleep at night” by being “scary” and putting a “monster costume so that he could not go to sleep”

Summary of findings

“Evident that his (G) experience of abuse has had a significant impact on his emotional well-being.

Further general examination today confirms the physical findings of a scar in the anus from a healed fissure, consistent with inflicted injury from a blunt penetrating force that he (G) has alleged”.

In respect of A, the report states “Based on today’s assessment, it is clear that G and A’s experience of abuse have had a significant impact on their emotional wellbeing. Physical findings today FURTHER CONFIRM the allegations of inflicted anal injury from insertion of a blunt penetrative force, and ARE CONSISTENT with A’s allegations of Sexual abuse”

Medical report dated 22nd September 2014

This report was drafted after she attended strategy meetings on 8th and 15th September 2014 (the appendices 1-2 attached to the report contained notes of the strategy meetings but the local authority and the police failed to provide us with this), supervised the consultations for both children on 12th and 16th September 2014 and spoke to Camden Social workers who informed her of the ABE interview on the 17th September 2014.

The report concludes in respect of A:

“The physical injuries found on her (A) skin are consistent with her allegations of physical abuse..

In the absence of a history of constipation, medical illness and accidental trauma ACCORDING TO THE GP NOTES, the anogenital findings of the scar and the RAD are consistent with her allegations of the application of a blunt penetrating force to her anus..sexual abuse.”

The report concludes in respect of G:

“The physical injuries found on his (G) skin are consistent with his allegations of physical abuse..

In the absence of a history of constipation, medical illness and accidental trauma ACCORDING TO THE GP NOTES, the anogenital findings of the scar and the RAD are consistent with his allegations of the application of a blunt penetrating force to his anus..sexual abuse. “
Police interpretation of Dr Hodes findings by choice of words

Please note the medical report’s use of the words that physical injuries “confirm”, “are consistent” and “evidence of findings consistent with” the allegations of sexual abuse as opposed to the police manipulation of the words to describe and deliberately attempt to undermine the findings of Dr Hodes, such as;

1. CRIS report entry by DS Fernandez 13th September “can be the result of a large solid poo” 
2. Police initial response dated 8th July 2015 “could be consistent with allegations of sexual abuse” and 
3. Current response dated 24th March 2016“may have been caused by physical abuse in the absence of a medical explanation. The discussion DS Fernandez had with Dr Hodes were such that she verbally reported inconclusive results on the 12th September 2014”

It is clear, that the police have attempted to undermine the findings of Dr Hodes on several occasions by misrepresenting her findings. This is a tactic we are now familiar with as they have endeavoured to do the same throughout the attempted cover up. 
Even IF the medical reports had stated or used the phrase “could be consistent“ with allegations of sexual abuse, ( which they do not ) this does not negate the duty for the police to investigate further. In fact, it still provides support to the allegations of sexual abuse, as it does not rule it out and therefore is evidence that should be acted upon during the police investigation. 
It is a note of interest that the police report dated 24th March refers to “absence of a medical explanation”. In the medical report of 22nd September Dr Hodes reviewed all GP notes and noted that there was no past history of constipation or other medical condition that could explain the injuries to the anus area of both children. Therefore, Dr Hodes had reviewed the children’s medical history and confirmed there is no other explanation, other than what the children alleged, as to how the injuries to the anus could have been caused. 
In fact, the GP notes attached to Dr Hodes report of 22nd September 2014 confirm that that their Mother was concerned about A’s behaviour on 17 January 2011 as the notes state;

“Mother concerned re A’s behaviour. Father given visitation rights last 3 weeks, sees them weekly. Since then A acting strangely, wakes mid sleep at night in hysterics, cries uncontrollably, clinging to mother, sometimes wakes and throws all bedding off the bed”

FREE THE HAMPSTEAD 2

The race is not for the swift.”

See the official site: http://www.hampsteadcoverup.com

HAMPSTEAD SRA UPDATE 29 FEB. + LEAKED MEDICAL REPORT + ELLA WITNESS INTERVIEWS including ALFRED WEBRE + IPCC REPORT

!. ELLA ABE

29 Feb.2016:

“Whilst Americans and some Europeans deal with the challenges faced by survivors and the families of Ritual Abuse and Trauma Based Mind Control.
The U.K. and other European Governments engaged in Mind Control programs (involving the ritual sacrifice of countless infants) of their citizens,and children within schools and churches persist in denial. The HAMPSTEAD COVER UP is their Black Swan. The captured lame stream media keep the public sedated, distracted and deceived.

The State and their minions have been caught red handed covering up a case of State sponsored mind control program involving Satanic Ritual Abuse. All the guilty concerned are attempting to ignore the problem whilst hoping that it will eventually go away, yet like a cancerous cyst the problem grows daily with the story now reaching a critical mass of concerned citizens world wide. The lost souls have embarked on yet another offensive, due to the increasing public awareness of the case, particularly by Americans who have their own documented history of SRA/TBMC, The Franklin Cover up, The McMartin Pre School scandal etc. Numerous blogs/websites with information from psychotherapists and survivors who far from remaining in denial, are organising regular conferences where they exchange research information regarding solutions and ways to help survivors and their families. The Sun yesterday put out a 3 page hit piece on SRA siting the Hampstead Cover up and a young Nurse named Carol Felstead ?

Regarding the DA Notice. Ella has been in contact with a researcher from Australia who shared that information with us, and apart from the usual suspects’ smear campaign reflecting Pauffley’s fraudulent judgement in March last year this is the first lame stream media coverage of the case in the Sun yesterday. The site the False Memory Syndrome disinfo.

Regarding the False Memory Syndrome Foundation, Columbia Journalism Review stated:

“Rarely has such a strange and little-understood organization had such a profound effect on media coverage of such a controversial matter. The [False Memory Syndrome] foundation is an aggressive, well-financed PR machine adept at manipulating the press, harassing its critics, and mobilizing a diverse army of psychiatrists, outspoken academics, expert defense witnesses, litigious lawyers, Freud bashers, critics of psychotherapy, and devastated parents.”493

The FMSF has repeatedly cited a study presented at a Harvard conference where researchers were repeatedly able to implant the false memory of mundane tasks like grocery shopping, into their subjects using techniques such as hypnosis.494 It has been championed as proof that memories are easily manipulated. However, research has shown that memories of abuse function very differently than average memories.

“However, leading memory researchers such as Dr. Bessel van der Kolk of Harvard Medical School maintain that traumatic memories, which typically are engraved in the sensorimotor processes, are not subject to the same kinds of contamination that can affect normal memory. Traumatic amnesia, described in the DSM-III-R as psychogenic amnesia, is a phenomenon which has been known to mental health professionals for more than 100 years. The clinically observed characteristics of traumatic memory formation and retrieval match precisely the patterns of memory recovery exhibited by SRA [Satanic Ritual Abuse] survivors, and strongly confirm the reality of their cult abuse.”495

Denial serves no one. Neither victims nor perpetrators.
This is not a war. This is an awakening.”

IPCC Upholds Ella Draper’s Appeal [for a 2nd time too – in Jan 2017!]
Posted on February 5, 2016

https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2016/02/05/ipcc-upholds-ella-drapers-appeal/

HAMPSTEAD COVER UP: 22 Dec. ’15 ELLA DRAPER / ABRAHAM CHRISTIE – ED OPPERMAN REPORT

After that interview, this from Ella + Abraham:

“We have been aware of David Shurter as a cointel disinfo shill for a while.http://www.dysgenics.com/tag/lying-fraud/ This was confirmed when he lied about knowing Tavitrained Charlotte Ward/Jaqui Farmer, & then staged a fake public falling out with her in a “secret” Facebook group in order to ingratiate himself with us . They worked together on a video in January 2013.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dokzA0IQLZU

We played along in order to give him enough rope (hemp of course.) He once again exposed his intent, when after arranging an interview with one of his “contacts” a certain Steve, they both persistently attempted to locate us by encouraging us to record the interview via landline. We recorded the interview via Skype, with Shurter and Steve dominating the conversation. We had discussed sharing with their audience the part hempseed nutrition played in the children’s disclosures, but they expressed concern. We explained that the nutritional aspect was an integral part of the case, and they became agitated, so we agreed not to mention it.
Cathy O’brien explains that Cannabis/ Hemp/Marijuana deletes and prevents mind control.
We did NOT argue for an hour and 20 minutes as implied in their latest attempted hatchet job where they expose their obvious intent. We weren’t pleased with the interview, but were grateful for the chance to introduce the case to the American audience. Shurter then organised another interview with Doug Miller, another known F.B.I./C.I.A. agent, which we declined. Shortly after Shurter arranged yet another interview, this time with Ed Opperman.
Opperman obviously knew little of the facts of the case, repeatedly referring to Pauffley’s fraudulent judgement of March 19th 2015. However it wasn’t until we exposed the Trauma Based Mind Control element of the case that he showed his true colours, at one stage denying the veracity of our disclosure by saying,”..but that’s not true”
After the 2 hour show , he requested we do a further hour which we did . We agreed that he would air the show on Christ mass day. He however posted the video on his YT channel on the 22nd of December, and then accused us of leaking the show after 2222 found the show on his YT channel and reposted it. He threatened 2222 with copyright infringement, along with a tirade of verbal abuse insults and accusations.
2222 explained that because Opperman had posted the video on his YT channel it was considered fair game in Child Abuse cases, particularly in this case, where the guilty/State have been attempting to control the narrative and prevent the TRUTH from being revealed. We did tell 2222 & another supporter who were scheduled to interview us that we would do the Opperman interview first as he was waiting and eager. We also recorded the interview using a new mike, as listeners had complained of sound quality of previous interviews.
Ed Opperman seemed genuine, but has accused us of leaking our version to 2222. That is an easily disproven lie, as our vocals on our recording are much clearer due to the new microphone. Why would he do that, and why would we jeopardise the opportunity to reveal the TRUTH to his extensive network of listeners ?
Ed Opperman did express upset at the comments from Dearman’s 40 or so sock puppets,( he created some new socks for Christ Mass)
Youtube pulled 2222’s version but we still have the comments that show Opperman’s true colours.
Neither Opperman nor Shurter have replied to polite emails attempting to resolve what ‘could’ have been a misinnerstanding.
They have however recorded two shows where they blatantly and clumsily attempt to discredit us,( Abraham particularly )
They have been in a Tavispin since we publicly exposed the Tavistate/ British Intelligence, C.I.A. Trauma Based Mind Control aspects of the case, and these accusations are their attempt to discredit us, and control the narrative of the case. They obviously don’t want this info revealed to the U.S. public, and have staged this charade as an excuse not to air the revealing interview.They, (Shurter particularly) are concerned that they are unable to contain the story of State sponsored Mind Control Programs in schools to create an army of New Word Order slaves.
They are unaware that the Hampstead Cover Up is a poisoned chalice to ALL who come with ignoble intent.
The use of Occult practices, Luciferian/Satanic/Wicca, hypnosis, drugs etc. are all elements of State sponsored Trauma Based Mind Control programs, that are used to mislead & cover up the TBMC programs that have infested schools and pre schools/nurseries around the world,so no we haven’t dismissed the occult element in favour of MK Ultra/ Monarch, State sponsored Trauma Based Mind Control programs.We are merely explaining how they all fit together. Their lies and Tavispin are transparent and they are merely the latest to be exposed by the Metaphysics of the Hampstead Cover Up.
Apologies for the length of this explanation, but these agents have dug a rather deep hole which they have proceeded to fall in.
Respect and Best wishes for the New Year.
e & a “

David Shurter: Satanic Ritual Abuse Survivor , Hampstead Theories – “After my Interview… 

David Shurter: “After My Interview with Ed Opperman on the Hampstead Case in the UK” – see more: http://www.davidshurter.com/?p=5511

Mother Ella Draper Witness Statement 21 March 2015

A.L. Webre: Part I: Ella Draper & Abe Christie’stestimony on Hampstead pedophilia the UK High Court excluded 31 March 2015

“HAMPSTEAD COVERUP” – INTERVIEWS with ELLA DRAPER + ABRAHAM CHRISTIE 14 JUNE 2015

HAMPSTEAD COVER-UP on WorldBeyondBelief w/Ella and Abraham

Witness and Victim G.

March 11th, 2015.

Leaked Medical Reports End All Doubt About Sexual Abuse Claims.

The medical reports end any debate regarding the fact that children A and G were the victims of child sexual abuse in Hampstead and underline the criminal nature of the police interviews of September 17th, 2014. The question now is who is being protected? Who has the influence and power to cause the British police such an obvious and inexplicable mid investigation rethink? Clearly there is much more than a Z grade actor and the reputation of a school at stake here. Neither would logically merit the police choice to destroy this investigation and cover up these heinous crimes.

Background Chronology

September 5th 2014.
“A referral was made to the Barnet CAIF by (mother’s partner’s) brother in law who is a special constable. Following a disclosure by A and G that they had been sexually abused by their father and “teachers” and were part of a cult. This disclosure had been made when they were in Morocco over the summer. And the parents stated they were unsure who to inform as many people seemed to be involved, (including allegedly police and social workers.)
Initial police interviews conducted.
8/9/14. Initial strategy meeting held.
10/9/14. Visit to family home ahead of ABE interview.
11/9/14. Emergency Police Protection Order issued after the ABE yesterday evening during which witness A, witness G and witness E (mother) were interviewed separately.
Allegations of physical abuse from the mother’s partner towards both children and sexual abuse against both children by their father and “teachers”. They are now in Emergency Foster Placement.”

17/9/14.
Police conduct the retraction interviews in transparent attempt to bury the truth and vandalise justice.
Interviewing officers clearly bully false retractions from the children for unknown reasons that can only be sinister.
22/9/14. Police inform the mother E that they have found that the crimes against the children cannot be confirmed. The investigation is over.
22/9/14. Dr. Hodes writes the second medical report affirming the veracity of the sexual abuse allegations despite the retractions. Dr. Hodes cites a specific research finding that found that 16% of victims will retract the allegations and affirming therefore that the physical evidence of abuse should outweigh the retractions.

Lindsay C Malloy, MA Thomas D Lyon JD, and Joia A Quas
Fillal Dependency and recantation of Child Sex Abuse Allegations.
J.Am Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 46:2, 2007.

These statements were made without reference to the disgraceful performance of the interviewing officer in the retraction interviews, which only strengthen Dr. Hodes’ assertions.

The Medical Reports. Who wrote them and are they authentic?

There are two Medical Reports, one dated September 15th, 2014, the other September 22nd. Written on the stationary of the University College of London in a way that leaves no doubt as to their authenticity. Background checks on the names of the people who signed the documents end any doubt . To illustrate this I will cite the best known of the Doctors who have signed these reports Dr. Deborah Hodes (FRCPCH) Consultant Community Paediatrician. A cursory internet search indicates that Dr. Hodes is employed in that role at the University College London and is an expert in the field of child abuse having more than twenty years experience.

Dr Deborah Hodes

https://www.uclh.nhs.uk/OurServices/Consultants/Pages/DrDeborahHodes.aspx

The first report dated September 15th appears to have been written by Dr Harriett Gunn (SHO Senior House Officer)* but is also signed by Dr. Hodes, The second Report of September 22nd appears to have been written entirely by Dr. Hodes, as she is the sole signatory.

The Medical Examiners are highly experienced and well qualified.
This does not mean that they are infallible, of course, but these medical reports have been signed by medical practitioners considered to be authorities in the field with decades of experience.
Dr, Deborah Hodes, part of the examination and assessment team that physically examined the children on several occasions is absolutely unequivocal, even after the retraction interviews that the children have physical injuries, that substantiate their claims of physical abuse at the hands of the mother’s partner and more importantly the sexual abuse at the hands of the father and cohorts.

A Brief Overview of the Facts that Emerge from the Medical Reports.
The counter narrative states that the children’s stories were coached and fed to them by their mother’s partner who was himself guilty of minor physical abuse of the children.

The police retraction interviews tried to construct a narrative that the children had been denying the actions of the mother’s partner whilst making the claims against the father and school, yet the Medical Reports show that the children made the claims concurrently and were concurrently examined for both the injuries related to the minor physical abuse at the hands of the mother’s partner and the extremely serious sexual abuse at the hands of the father and staff at the school.
The male has one scar on his anus consistent with blunt force trauma, the female has several and has actually been physically damaged by the abuse in ways that really do not bear mentioning suffice to say that she has multiple injuries “consistent with the application of a blunt instrument.”
They could not be clearer. Someone has been doing deeply unpleasant things to these children, the more lurid claims relating to this case may be exaggerated, but there is a very simple and unmistakeable truth expressed in those medical reports.
After they were taken into Foster care, the children were heard to discuss the use of Vaseline as a lubricant their abusers used on them. They are no longer in the presence of the mother’s partner, there is no need for any story to be told, yet they were speaking about it in a matter of fact way.

The children independently told their story on multiple occasions to numerous Doctors and other disinterested parties and were consistent in their claims against both parties. There was medical evidence to support the claims that were made against both parties.

Both children were observed to be suffering the symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Both children complained at their treatment at the hands of the mothers partner, yet it was absolutely clear to the examiners that it was the father they feared. Each child independently expressed the fear that their father would kill them, one had nightmares about it. Expressions of fear do not get more profound than that.

The details outlined in these reports are deeply unpleasant. Unfortunately it is necessary to do this and I will ensure that only the completely necessary information is included. There is a duty to attempt to spread the truth in a matter of gross injustice such as this case represents and I have sought not to identify anyone by name other than the Doctors whose role appears to have been an honourable one.

Key Excerpts from the Two Medical Reports.

September 15th, 2014.

“Witness G “does not report any history of constipation or diarrhoea . However he does report that it does often hurt and he has often bled when opening his bowels although this had decreased significantly in the past two months which his sister says is because it is two months since they have seen their father. (the children were also removed from the school). He opens his bowels everyday and reports that his stool is soft. “( a detail that is unfortunately necessary due to later events)
Physical Abuse.
“Both G and A report that they have been hit multiple times with a metal spoon by mother’s partner over the head and the legs. They also report they have been pushed into walls. They also allege that mother’s partner holds his hand over their mouth till they “can’t breathe.” On a recent visit to Morocco over the summer witness G explains that he was hit on the ear by the mother’s partner in the left ear which caused his ear to bleed and his left eye to be swollen and bruised. G and A said that G was then not allowed to leave the holiday home until the bruises had disappeared.”
(Note: the details contained here completely destroy the notion that these allegations were made as the result of coaching. Did the mother’s partner also coach the children to make all these detailed and specific allegations against him? Of course he didn’t. The fact that these allegations against the mother’s partner were made at the same time as the allegations of sexual abuse is clearly overwhelming evidence that these children spoke the truth to the best of their ability about both issues and were not under external control of either party to a custody dispute as they made the allegations.)

Sexual abuse allegations.

“ A has explained that at school a teacher named Mr. H calls children over and makes them take off their underwear. A explained that she and other children including G are made to bend over and a “plastic willy” is inserted into the anus. Whilst Mr. H holds onto their hips. A also stated that Mr.H “makes noises” while this is done.

Of note, she says that he gives them a refresher bar to eat as a reward and to chew on while this is happening so they “can’t scream or make a noise” and they are asked to face forwards and not look backwards. G has said that the same thing has happened to him. G says that after this has happened he has bleeding from the anus and subsequently. it is very painful when he opens his bowels.”

Victim G Physical injuries described.
His (G) anus was examined in the left lateral position using gentle buttock separation for 30 seconds. He had one anal fissure scar at 9 o’clock on examination of the anus. There was no reflex anal dilation.”

Summary.
“In both the general physical examination and the genital examination of G today. There are physical signs consistent with the allegations given by G and A. The scar in the anus is from a healed fissure, secondary to the application of a blunt penetrating force that he (G) has alleged.
In summary, G has physical signs consistent with his allegations of both physical abuse and sexual abuse. “
Dr. Harriett Gunn (SHO) to
Dr. Deborah Hodes.
Medical Report Dated September the 22nd 2014.

The report begins with Dr, Hodes outlining her extensive experience in the field. Twenty four years worth.
Dr.Hodes states that she was present at two strategy meetings and two physical examinations relating to this case. In addition Dr. Hodes has spoken to Camden area social workers and also reviewed the photographic evidence pertaining to the children’s injuries.

Victim and WItness A on September 17th 2014.
Victim and Witness A during a Police interview.

Summary of Relevant Evidence Victim A..
“She alleged that lubrication was used prior to the insertion of the penis or plastic penis and identified and discussed this with her foster carer.. She also told me about having had an injection. She alleged that bleeding occurred after the event and then had pain on opening her bowels.”
“She told me that she has difficulty getting to sleep and she has bad dreams including dreaming of her father killing her ”
Physical Findings.
“Below is a list of injuries found in a physical examination of A shown in body maps and the police photographs.”

1.“3 x 4mm abrasion to the pinna of her left ear and 3mm laceration posterior to her left ear overlying the mastoid, A alleged she was pinched and picked up by her ear on Morocco.”

2. “7mm longtitudinal abrasion (excoriated) on the right lateral aspect of her right ankle. A alleged she had been pushed against an outside wall and “had picked it” when she was in Morocco.”

3. “2.0cm x 0.5cm healing abrasion on the left side of the chin. A alleged that she was hit across the face with a metal spoon while in Morocco.“

Below is a list of injuries found on ano-genital examination of A recorded in the DVDs.
(Warning Note: This is deeply unpleasant and awful and a quick summary is that there are multiple and in my opinion horrific injuries to A’s nether regions)
“1. In the left lateral position with gentle buttock separation there was anal laxity and a brief view of the rectum. In the knee chest position with gentle buttock separation, there was reflex anal dilation (RAD) after 5-10 seconds. The reflex anal dilation continued and there was a view into the rectal ampulla and there was no stool present.
2. There was a healed scar in the ruggae at the 10 -11 o’clock position extending from the anal orifice to the anal verge. It was seen in both the left lateral position and the knee to chest position. The abnormalities in the ruggae at the 4 0′ c;ock and 5 o’clock positions may represent healed scar tissue or variation in the ruggae.configuration.”
There are between two and four injuries, with two undoubted and two speculative.
Conclusions regarding the allegations.
“The physical injuries found on her skin are consistent with the physical abuse she described.
In the absence of a history of constipation, medical illness or accidental trauma according to the GP’s notes, the anogenital findings of the scar and the RAD are consistent with her allegations of the application of a blunt penetrating force to her anus (2); sexual abuse.”
She has described symptoms of post traumatic stress.”

Summary of A and G by Dr. Hodes.
“In my opinion A and G are suffering significant harm as evidenced by the following:-
1.Both children have physical signs of physical abuse that support their allegations.
2.Both children have physical signs of sexual abuse that support their allegations.
3.They have symptoms of post traumatic stress.
4. It is now understood from a 2007 substantiated study of child sexual abuse that retraction occurs far more commonly (16% in this series) than previously thought.
5. In my opinion, the extensive and detailed accounts given by both children that were repeated to different professionals contain details of sexual acts that such young children would need to have direct experience of.” (Note: in order to be able to describe them is the unwritten implication.)

To put it simply, Dr. Hodes is stating that there is physical evidence in support of both sets of allegations which really highlights how farcical the entire “they were coached” counter-narrative really is. Because children who have been coached to make false allegations in order to influence a custody battle we are told, were not even coached to lie about the minor physical injuries they suffered at the hands allegedly of the mother’s partner. What kind of coaching is that?
It really shows the desperation to protect that this preposterous and absurd notion was even floated as the counter-narrative. It is pathetic and insulting. Truly laughable.

Dr Hodes signature
Dr. Hodes signs off on the September 22nd report. She plainly rejected the retractions.

Ethical and Legal Issues.

The leaking of these documents may constitute a criminal offense, I honestly do not know, but it is obvious that these records have been released in the broader public interest in order to oppose and expose a clear and outrageous injustice. These are exceptional circumstances in which otherwise unethical or even unlawful actions are necessary and just in my opinion.

Why is this happening?

It beggars belief that this investigation was curtailed and destroyed in order to protect a Z grade actor or even the Staff and Institutional reputation of the school and church involved. Something far more important is being protected here, but it is completely unclear whom or what have managed to engineer the stunning travesty that led to the Investigating Police coaching and bullying retractions from the child victims, Witnesses and Victims A and G.
The real mystery at this point is who is protecting this and why?
The way it is being covered up you would almost get the on it’s face ludicrous idea that this was some type of mad, satanic leadership induction program. The people involved may believe they are doing what is right for their children in some sick parallel universe sense.

We Are Living in a Twilight Zone of Serial Denial.

It is completely possible that elements of the stories the children tell that do not relate to events they actually witnessed may be embellished or even incorrect. There is sadly no doubt that whatever the veracity of the claims the police made a decision, a bizarre and inexplicable decision to destroy the case and conduct a cover up. Unless and until the police have a rethink as is inevitable but may take decades, there is little that can be done to even begin to seek justice for the Hampstead victims beyond trying to expose this to enough people that it causes an uproar that requires an immediate police rethink.

We seem to exist in a bizarre twilight zone where anyone with any connection to power can apparently do what they like to children and expect to suffer only the infamy of the grave. As long as you are not fussed about your reputation when deceased and you are connected you do not even have to be discreet. Once you die it will all emerge of course and your name and reputation will be destroyed but other than that there is no penalty.
While it has become clear again and again that the unthinkable has actually been rather routine, that these unbelievably evil crimes have been happening for decades and yet when confronted with a genuine contemporary cover up, the entire “official” British media have literally not a word to say.

Other than the Hamptead and Highgate Express. The local weekly paper had their say recently, they covered the story from the point of view of the alleged perpetrators, predictably, so the reference to the case was rather incidental, but telling.
Google under fire after leaked personal details of Hampstead residents remain on web – Crime & Court – Hampstead Highgate Express

http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/crime-court/google_under_fire_after_leaked_personal_details_of_hampstead_residents_remain_on_web_1_3967235

The real story is instantly dismissed thus “The claims, which the mainstream media is barred by court order from reporting on, are said to have been investigated by police and found to be baseless.” Which I think can be fairly claimed to be a downright lie. Perhaps gratitude is the right response to the total lack of mainstream news coverage. Please note the brazen hypocrisy of the Hampstead and Highgate Express stating that “ which the mainstream media is barred by court order from reporting on” before continuing “are said to have been investigated by police and found to be baseless.” Clearly reporting (and indeed completely mendaciously and inaccurately) without naming or even alluding to a source, let alone any evidence to back up their dishonest claim. I hope they are proud of their work at the Hampstead and Highgate Express. Their efforts in support of evil will be rewarded in the deserved manner eventually I am sure, one way or another. It’s only a matter of time.

Return #WhistleblowerKids and #AbuseSurvivors to their Russian Family!

Sources + Important Links=

14 09 15 Medical report.pdf – Google Drive

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Byzy22cCtwpdbERtNXNhQ0Y5RmM/edit

14 09 22 Medical report.pdf – Google Drive

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Byzy22cCtwpdYy0xdVZFcGxscXM/edit

Aangirfan: HAMPSTEAD – DOCUMENTS

http://www.aanirfan.blogspot.com.au/2015/03/hampstead-documents.html

Aangirfan: FROM HAMPSTEAD TO SAN FRANCISCO

http://www.aanirfan.blogspot.com.au/2015/03/from-hampstead-to-san-francisco.htm

Royal Free Hospital in Hampstead to be investigated over links with Jimmy Savile – Health – Hampstead Highgate Express

http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/health/royal_free_hospital_in_hampstead_to_be_investigated_over_links_with_jimmy_savile_1_3058052

PLAYLIST of 45 videos re #Whistleblower and #WhistleblowerKids | ‘Whistleblower Kids’ in the Court of Public Interest

https://whistleblowerkids.wordpress.com/2015/03/01/playlist-of-45-videos-re-whistleblower-of-whistleblowerkids/

JUSTICE DENIED: Live Recording as Police raid Pedophile Ring Whistle-blower kids mum’s home

http://google-law.blogspot.gr/2015/02/live-recording-of-police-raid-on.html

Abusers Online | ‘Whistleblower Kids’ in the Court of Public Interest

https://whistleblowerkids.wordpress.com/social-media/links-to-videos/abusers-online/

‘Whistleblower Kids’ in the Court of Public Interest | From Child Snatching and the Secrecy of Family Courts to Forced Adoptions, Child Sexual Exploitation and Satanic Ritual Abuse

https://whistleblowerkids.wordpress.com/

JOINING Video Dots with #WhistleblowerKids: Exposing World run by Powerful #Paedophiles | ‘Whistleblower Kids’ in the Court of Public Interest

https://whistleblowerkids.wordpress.com/2015/03/06/joining-video-dots-with-whistleblowerkids-exposing-world-run-by-powerful-paedophiles/

Dr Deborah Hodes

https://www.uclh.nhs.uk/OurServices/Consultants/Pages/DrDeborahHodes.aspx

FORWARD UK on Twitter: “FORWARD Trustee, Dr Deborah Hodes, announces opening of the first specialist #FGM clinic in London

ZeeklyTV – Anonymous’s Channel

http://zeeklytv.com/user/Anonymous

Dr Hodes Sources.
Lindsay C Malloy, MA Thomas D Lyon JD, and Joia A Quas
Fillal Dependency and recantation of Child Sex Abuse Allegations.
J.Am Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 46:2, 2007.

Bradley Ar, Wood, JM, How Do Children Tell?
The disclosure process in child sexual abuse.
Negl. 20 881-891. 1996

The British Medical Association Confidentiality Guide for Staff.(called the confidentiality toolkit)

confidentialitytoolkit_full.pdf

http://bma.org.uk/-/media/files/pdfs/practical%20advice%20at%20work/ethics/confidentialitytoolkit_full.pdf

Excerpts Relevant to this Case.

1. The duty of confidentiality
Confidentiality is an essential requirement for the preservation of trust between patients and health professionals and is subject to legal and ethical safeguards. Patients should be able to expect that information about their health which they give in confidence will be kept confidential unless there is a compelling reason why it should not. There is also a strong public interest in maintaining confidentiality so that individuals will be encouraged to seek appropriate treatment and share information relevant to it.

Using and disclosing information
3. data should be anonymised wherever possible .
occasionally, when it is not practicable to obtain consent, information may be disclosed where the law requires or where there is an overriding public interest, eg where child abuse is suspected
• disclosures should be kept to the minimum necessary to achieve the purpose
5. Anonymisation
Information may be used more freely if the subject of the information is not identifiable in any way.
Usually, data can be considered to be anonymous where clinical or administrative information is separated from details that may permit the individual to be identified such as name, date of birth and postcode. Even where such obvious identifiers are missing, rare diseases, drug treatments or statistical analyses which have very small numbers within a small population may allow individuals to be identified. A combination of items increases the chances of patient identification.

When anonymised data will serve the purpose, health professionals must anonymise data to this extent and, if necessary, take technical advice about anonymisation before releasing data. Whilst it is not ethically necessary to seek consent for the use of anonymised data, general information about when their data will be anonymised should be available to patients.

http://www.abbreviations.com/term/1407008

*S.H.O Senior House Officer A junior doctor in the pre Modernising Medical Careers era (pre-2007) of training in the UK, in the 2nd post-graduate year–i.e., immediately after the PRHO–pre-registration house officer year, which is now designated Foundation Year 1–FY1. SHOs are now called FY-2. Some SHO posts still exist and are taken as a prelude to certain specialities–e.g., surgery, but are no longer a standard year in training schemes for junior doctors in the UK

sourcehttp://crimesofempire.com/2015/03/11/hampstead-leaked-medical-reports-end-all-doubt-about-sexual-abuse-claims/

 ——————————————————————————————————————

FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit: 
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

NB: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

SHOCKING: “Hungry children ‘eating from school bins’ in Morecambe, Lancs + DWP FAILINGS ARCHIVE

HOW £MUCH DOES THE GOVT. GIVE TO THE #ARMS TRADE HERE + ABROAD CONSTANTLY?  DESPICABLE!  and note  judges have just had a huge pay rise: Rise would see their pay jump from £181,500 a year to £240,000. Judges could reportedly be in line for an annual pay rise of almost £60,000 in a move which could spark fury among public sector workers. 12 Oct 2018 – Judges ‘in line for £60,000 pay rise’ The Independent  

https://www.independent.co.uk/…/judges-pay-rise-salary-senior-salaries-review-body-th…

Hungry children ‘eating from school bins’ in Morecambe, Lancs BBC News

Siobhan Collingwood

Siobhan Collingwood said children are arriving at school with empty lunchboxes

Children are arriving at a school so hungry they are searching the bins for food, its head teacher has said.

A cross-party group of MPs has called on the government to appoint a Minister for Hunger to deal with “food insecurity” especially among children.

Siobhan Collingwood, head teacher of the school in Morecambe, Lancashire, said one in 10 of its pupils came from families using foodbanks.

“Unfortunately I’ve got the faces behind the statistics,” she added.

The Environmental Audit Committee highlighted 2017 Unicef figures showing 19% of children under 15 in the UK live with adults who struggle to buy food.

The government said the number of children living in workless households is at a record low.

MPs have called on the government to appoint a Minister for Hunger

School meals generic

Ms Collingwood said there were currently 35 children at her school whose families are supported by foodbanks, adding: “It’s probably higher because they are the ones we know about.”

“When children are food deprived it alters their behaviour and they do become quite food obsessed, so we have some children who will be stealing fruit cores from the bins,” she added.

“We have children who have nothing in their lunch boxes and children who are just fixated upon food.”

The head teacher said it was “heartbreaking” and added that parents had been “arriving at school literally bursting into tears telling me they have no means of feeding their children”.

Ms Collingwood said she had noticed more problems since the introduction of Universal Credit.

“Families are coming in telling me they are routinely loaning food to each other, my day-to-day experience is telling me this is a growing problem.”

A Department of Work and Pensions spokeswoman said that, since 2010, one million people had been lifted out of absolute poverty – including 300,000 children.

She added: “We already provide support through free school meals and our Healthy Start Vouchers.”

Related Topics

source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-46827360

#childabuse #Raging #Anonymous #UK

 SCANDALOUS DWP FAILINGS

.

MUST SEE! – “The Universal Credit Crisis” – BBC Panorama 12 Nov. 2018 + archive

Universal Crap   “THE UNIVERSAL CREDIT CRISIS” – BBC iPlayer [while it lasts: 28 days?]  Panorama 12/11/2018 –   https://www.bbc.co.uk/…/panorama-the-universal-credit-crisis  related: See the DWP archive  of failures: https://butlincat.com/?s=dwp

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment |
.
 

MUST SEE LINKS! “Revealed: DWP’s secret, ‘financially devastating’ proposals for benefits appeals” + “Terminally ill Northampton woman has appeal over disability benefits refused” + “Former DWP ministers could face police investigation over fit-to-work tests + MORE

Revealed: DWP’s secret, ‘financially devastating’ proposals for benefits appeals 0 By John Pring on April 21, 2016 Benefits and Poverty Listen The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has drawn up secret plans for sweeping reforms that would make it … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | 1 Comment |
.
 

OUTRAGEOUS!! Diabetic man blames DWP benefit sanctions for leg amputation + DAVID CLAPSON: “HOLD AN INQUIRY INTO BENEFIT SANCTIONS THAT KILLED MY BROTHER!”

Originally posted on VICTIMS OF THE STATE
above: Jeremy Corbyn  Diabetic man blames DWP benefit sanctions for leg amputation 17:55, 7 Sep 2016 Updated 17:56, 7 Sep 2016 By Todd Fitzgerald David Boyce, from Weaste, was hit with benefit sanctions but has…

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment | 
.

OUTRAGEOUS!! Diabetic man blames DWP benefit sanctions for leg amputation + DAVID CLAPSON: “HOLD AN INQUIRY INTO BENEFIT SANCTIONS THAT KILLED MY BROTHER!”

above: Jeremy Corbyn  Diabetic man blames DWP benefit sanctions for leg amputation 17:55, 7 Sep 2016 Updated 17:56, 7 Sep 2016 By Todd Fitzgerald David Boyce, from Weaste, was hit with benefit sanctions but has now won an appeal and wants compensation … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | 1 Comment |
.

“Former DWP ministers could face police investigation over fit-to-work tests” + BOURNEMOUTH SURGERY FAILING PATIENTS + WAGING WAR ON THE SICK AND DISABLED + more

Former DWP ministers could face police investigation over fit-to-work tests . A complaint was made against Iain Duncan Smith and Chris Grayling    Monday 9 May 2016  Jon Stone @joncstone Former Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith Getty          Police in Scotland … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment |
.
.

Appalling DWP Failings: “Universal Credit dad-of-three tried to kill himself while on phone to DWP” 01 Jan. 2018 + archive

Universal Credit dad-of-three tried to kill himself while on phone to DWP Dean Lovell-Payne, 52, took a massive overdose in September 2018 after having to endure almost three months without receiving any benefits at all Dean Lovell-Payne said although he … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment | .
.
.

MORE DWP MONSTROSITIES: “Mum with cancer on Universal Credit forced to wait months to bury son after she was £900 short for funeral” + archive

Mum with cancer on Universal Credit forced to wait months to bury son after she was £900 short for funeral  Desperate cancer patient Diane Hannaby, 52, was left in debt after waiting two months for enough funds for her son’s funeral Cancer … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment | .
.
.

“Stop Universal Credit” day is 01 December: “The DWP is facing the wrath of thousands of people this week”

The DWP is facing the wrath of thousands of people this week Steve Topple 26th November 2018 0  0 comments https://spkt.io/a/149301 SPONSORED BY CASUMO The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is facing the wrath of potentially thousands of people this week. … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment |.
.
.

UNIVERSAL CREDIT FAILS: May’s DWP claims at PMQs were debunked before she began 25 Oct. ’18 + archive

May’s DWP claims at PMQs were debunked before she began AUDIO: LISTEN to this article:   https://spkt.io/a/128181 At Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) on Wednesday 24 October, Theresa May made some bold claims about the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). Sadly … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment |.
.
.

The Carol Woods Coverup: Disappeared elderly people, + DVLA + DWP frauds + ID THEFT now proven AGAIN – 19 Sept. 2018 + archive

Why will no one sort this massive corruption out? So many top UK government officials have been written to by many people but  everything is ignored wholesale! Received: From: carol woods <woodsresearch2002@yahoo.co.uk> To: many UK govt. officials inc. ministers@dwp.gsi.gov.uk <ministers@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, donald.toon@nca.x.gsi.gov.uk … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment | .
.
.

SCRAP “UNIVERSAL CREDIT”!: The DWP is now facing the wrath of five million workers 18 Sept. 18 + archive

STEVE TOPPLE The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is under more pressure over its flagship benefit policy. Because an organisation with over five million members has now officially called for Universal Credit to be stopped and scrapped. The DWP: five million … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment | .
.
.

DWP: The “DOSSIER OF DISGRACE” and demonising clients 29 July 2018 + archive

update:  More than a million benefits sanctions imposed on disabled people since 2010 Groundbreaking Demos study reveals ‘culture of disbelief’ about disability among jobcentre staff leads to money being docked https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/feb/18/disabled-people-million-benefit-sanctions-since-2010.

The DWP was just savaged in a ‘dossier … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment 
.
.

SCANDALOUS! “The DWP just revealed the eye-watering millions it paid out to private companies” [don’t forget the highly questionable “Prospects Workfair”] – JULY 26TH, 2018 + archive

The DWP just revealed the eye-watering millions it paid out to private companies JULY 26TH, 2018  STEVE TOPPLE TRENDING, UK https://spkt.io/a/98811On Thursday 26 July, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) revealed the amount it paid out in June to private contractors. It’s … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment |
.
.

The DWP sneaked out a damning admission just before parliament closed for the summer – The Canary 26 July 2018 + archive

JULY 25TH, 2018  STEVE TOPPLE ANALYSIS, UK The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) released some damning information about benefit sanctions; conveniently just as parliament was closing for its summer holidays. The DWP: sanctions and mental health On Tuesday 24 July, minister of … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | 1 Comment | 
.
.

DWP WRONG AGAIN: “The #DWP just admitted a court case it lost will affect thousands of people” AUDIO + ATOS + SANCTIONS DEATHS + archive

The DWP just admitted a court case it lost will affect thousands of people JULY 11TH, 2018  STEVE TOPPLE ANALYSIS, UK https://spkt.io/a/95341 The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) just admitted that a court case it lost means it may have to pay … Continue reading 

.

The Carol Woods Coverup: the house theft, the ID frauds, Mike Todd’s murder, DWP frauds + more 30 May 2018 + archive

Why will noone dare sort this massive corruption out? The “Preface” directly below, followed by the most recent updates from 30 – 26 May 18 from Carol Woods. The posts detail the serious crime occurring to Carol, and connected to … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment | 
.

SHOCKING: “Hundreds losing disability benefits in Personal Independence Payments shake-up” + The DWP has been caught trying to ‘coerce’ GPs into saying their patients are fit-for-work – 29 May 2018

 “Hundreds losing disability benefits in Personal Independence Payments shake-up” – Echo Hundreds losing disability benefits in Personal Independence Payments shake-up  Will Frampton  WFrampton_Echo   HUNDREDS of disabled people in Dorset lost their benefits when they were reassessed for a new government … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | 1 Comment |
.

DISGRACEFUL: “The DWP left one man so ‘destitute’ that the police had to step in to help him” – The Canary

The DWP left one man so ‘destitute’ that the police had to step in to help him MAY 18TH, 2018  STEVE TOPPLE TRENDING, UK TRENDING The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) reportedly left one man so “destitute” that police were called out … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment | 
.

Dying mum told by DWP to prove for third time that her cancer is terminal – MetroUK

Bradley JollyWednesday 4 Apr 2018 3:41 pm MORE: Most people are now winning their appeals against disability benefit decisions MORE: Every PIP claim reassessed: Here’s what you need to know   source: http://metro.co.uk/2018/04/04/dying-mum-told-by-dwp-to-prove-for-third-time-that-her-cancer-is-terminal-7440437/?ito=amp-share-facebook-top?ito=cbshare see more: ‘Suicidal’ man with anorexia told … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment | .
.

The DWP is in court again and it could ‘open the floodgates’ for countless disabled people – the Canary

The DWP is in court again and it could ‘open the floodgates’ for countless disabled people APRIL 30TH, 2018  STEVE TOPPLE ANALYSIS, UK Spread the word:  Facebook Twitter ANALYSIS https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-23/html/container.htmlTHE VIEWS EXPRESSED IN THIS PIECE ARE NOT INTENDED AS LEGAL ADVICE. The Department … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment | 
.

OUTRAGEOUS: The DWP has been caught trying to ‘coerce’ GPs into saying their patients are fit-for-work – the Canary – PEOPLE ARE DIEING

The DWP has been caught trying to ‘coerce’ GPs into saying their patients are fit-for-work APRIL 27TH, 2018  STEVE TOPPLE ANALYSIS, DISCOVERY, HEALTH Campaigners and medical professionals have discovered the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is trying to “coerce” GPs into saying that their sick … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | 2 Comments | 
.

The Carol Woods Coverup: Falsely arrested – DWP FRAUD LA2 found out, reported, reprisals offered, threaten eviction 28 March 2018 + archive

Some Background – why does Carol Woods suffer so much harassment still, since whistleblowing in 2001?: Carol Woods = “It is a highly complex matter which the police organise where they try to make me someone I am not. They … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment | 
.

DWP goes back to court to block future benefit appeals – 20 Feb. 2018

The DWP is using a bedroom tax case to challenge future welfare appeals By Natalie BloomerTuesday, 20 February 2018 10:15 AM 7 The government is back in court today in a second attempt to block a legal route used by many people … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment | 
.

DWP’s contracted outfit ATOS hardly cut it – “Private Eye” no. 1460 + BENEFIT SANCTIONS + more

“Private Eye” – no. 1460 –  23/12/17 – 10/01/18 Monday, 19 September 2016 OUTRAGEOUS!! Diabetic man blames DWP benefit sanctions for leg amputation + “HOLD AN INQUIRY INTO BENEFIT SANCTIONS THAT KILLED MY BROTHER!” + MORE Diabetic man blames DWP … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment |
.
.

The Shocking Carol Woods Coverup: Thefts / DWP fraudsters exposed – 03 Dec. 17 + archive

Some Background Carol Wood’s situation: Carol Woods = “It is a highly complex matter which the police organise where they try to make me someone I am not. They have in fact tried to invent me as the reverse of myself … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment | 
.
.

The Shocking Carol Woods Coverup: DWP Frauds: past and present, Public Monies used to Defraud, Mike Todd murder, + archive 25 Nov. 17

On 23 November 2017 at 14:31, Data Analysis <cherrytrees2007@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: This is for the record: I found the car KX66 driving about rural areas to confirm something he would claim was FACT when it would be FICTION. That seen by … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment |.
.
 

Desperate disabled gran attempted suicide after brutal DWP cuts left her fearing she would lose her home 18 Nov 17 D. Mirror + MUST SEE LINKS

Originally posted on VICTIMS OF THE STATE
Revealed: DWP’s secret, ‘financially devastating’ proposals for benefits appeals 0 By John Pring on April 21, 2016 Benefits and Poverty Listen The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has drawn up secret plans…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment | 
.

OUTRAGEOUS!! Diabetic man blames DWP benefit sanctions for leg amputation + DAVID CLAPSON: “HOLD AN INQUIRY INTO BENEFIT SANCTIONS THAT KILLED MY BROTHER!”

OUTRAGEOUS!! Diabetic man blames DWP benefit sanctions for leg amputation + DAVID CLAPSON: “HOLD AN INQUIRY INTO BENEFIT SANCTIONS THAT KILLED MY BROTHER!” Posted on September 19, 2016 by butlincat above: Jeremy Corbyn  Diabetic man blames DWP benefit sanctions for leg amputation17:55, … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment |
.

UK: DWP AGAIN IN DISREPUTE OVER DUBIOUS AND SHOCKING LONGRUNNING CASE – 29 Sept. 17

You know it’s bad news for the DWP when a judge begins his ruling with ‘Oh dear. Oh dear. Oh dear.’ September 28th, 2017 Emily Apple UK   It is very unusual for a judge to start the introduction [pdf, … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment | .
.

OUTRAGEOUS! “Terminally ill woman found ‘fit for work’ by callous DWP needs your help”

Despite being diagnosed with terminal cancer, Claire was found ‘fit for work’ by the Department for Work and Pensions. Sue Jones On Mar 1, 2017 Last updated Mar 1, 2017      Claire Hardwicke. Photo: Tiffany Williams/JustGiving 4.6K Shares Share Tweet … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment | 
.

The Shocking CAROL WOODS COVERUP: CHRONIC E-CRIME AT LANCASTER UNI. LIBRARY + SERIOUS HARRASSMENT WITH INTENT BY LANCS. GESTAPO + DWP / EMBEZZLEMENT FRAUD + archive 23 Dec. 16

The corruption and resultant coverup, ever constant, regarding the revelations Carol Woods has and still is detailing is truly staggering, with anybody in government who has been contacted refusing to do anything about any of it,  from the P.M. down to Chief … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment | 
.

Attack on DWP sanctions by the National Audit Office – PETITION UPDATE 2 DEC. 2016

Petition update Attack on sanctions by the National Audit Office   Gill Thompson Stevenage, United Kingdom 2 Dec 2016 — The government sadly still feel that sanctions are a necessary and long-standing part of the welfare system, and indeed still quote … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment |
.
.

“Former DWP ministers could face police investigation over fit-to-work tests” + BOURNEMOUTH SURGERY FAILING PATIENTS + WAGING WAR ON THE SICK AND DISABLED + more

Former DWP ministers could face police investigation over fit-to-work tests . A complaint was made against Iain Duncan Smith and Chris Grayling    Monday 9 May 2016  Jon Stone @joncstone Former Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith Getty          Police in Scotland … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment 
.

MUST SEE LINKS! “Revealed: DWP’s secret, ‘financially devastating’ proposals for benefits appeals” + “Terminally ill Northampton woman has appeal over disability benefits refused” + “Former DWP ministers could face police investigation over fit-to-work tests + MORE

Revealed: DWP’s secret, ‘financially devastating’ proposals for benefits appeals 0 By John Pring on April 21, 2016 Benefits and Poverty Listen The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has drawn up secret plans for sweeping reforms that would make it … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | 1 Comment | 
.

Stalkers – Saturday 15 Dec. 2018 + archive UPDATED + more targeting + “the “snooper’s charter” ruled illegal”

Rogue police have been behind my gangstalking for years, I allege. They get shadowbanning performed on many online posts, and sites, and hack my computers and phones – even my Royal Mail,  because I dare to expose certain horrific cases … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment | 
.

OUTRAGEOUS: Universal Credit mum in High Court fight after benefit leaves her £8.98 for a month 12 Dec. ’18 + archive

via Universal Credit mum in High Court fight after benefit leaves her £8.98 for a month see the archive:  MORE DWP MONSTROSITIES: “Mum with cancer on Universal Credit forced to wait months to bury son after she was £900 short … Continue reading 

Quote | Posted on  by | Tagged  | Leave a comment |
.

G4S AGAIN!! “Two prison guards beat up a teenage inmate”, + G4S: “Undercover footage allegedly shows staff “mocking, abusing and even assaulting detainees” at a facility in Gatwick”

Two prison guards beat up a teenage inmate, but that’s just the tip of the iceberg for children in prison   Glen Black 4th December 2018 LISTEN TO AUDIO OF THIS POST =   https://spkt.io/a/156619 The “punishment beating” of a 17-year … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment | 
.

MUST SEE! – “The Universal Credit Crisis” – BBC Panorama 12 Nov. 2018 + archive

Universal Crap   “THE UNIVERSAL CREDIT CRISIS” – BBC iPlayer [while it lasts: 28 days?]  Panorama 12/11/2018 –   https://www.bbc.co.uk/…/panorama-the-universal-credit-crisis  related: See the DWP archive  of failures: https://butlincat.com/?s=dwp

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment |
.

Maurice Kirk: “G4S actively stopping my medical care” coverup + S. Wales police misconduct 04 Nov. 2018 + archive

Royal Mail to my home address has now ceased, and that means letters from Maurice. Until the electronic street door entry system has been reverted back to normal, no post for or from anyone can be delivered by the postman, as … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment |
.

Universal Credit isn’t working!!! Sign the petition to Esther McVey “PAUSE THE ROLL OUT OF UNIVERSAL CREDIT”! + archive

Pause the roll out of Universal Credit To Esther McVey Petition text Pause the roll out of Universal Credit: fix it or scrap it Why is this important? Universal Credit is a scheme that replaces lots of different benefits. But … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment | 
.
.

Private: Brian Harvey on the Carol Woods case – 12 Aug. 2018 VIDEO

@ 35.30secs into Harvey’s latest “Back Again” 12 Aug. he moans that Carol Wood’s case is not genuine simply because she was interviewed by Brian Gerrish [just one of many interviews made at the time] – what kind of bs … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged  | Leave a comment |
.

Carol Woods: the house theft, F.O.I.A. request shenanigens, serious fraud + more 23 July 2018 + archive

Received: updates from 14 July ’18: Why will no one sort this massive corruption out? Photo missing from SEC 7 file 13 July 2018 From: carol woods <woodsresearch2002@yahoo.co.uk> Subject: Photo missing from SEC 7 file. To: “data.protection@lancashire.pnn.police.uk” <data.protection@lancashire.pnn.police.uk>, “carl.melling@lancashire.pnn.police.uk” <carl.melling@lancashire.pnn.police.uk>, “hq-professionalstandards1@lancashire.police.uk” … Continue reading 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment | 
.
.

SHARE THIS!!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hampstead SRA: Sabine Mcneil was sentenced to 9 years at Southwark CC this afternoon 09 Jan. 2018 + archive

Sabine Mcneil was sentenced to 9 years at Southwark CC this afternoon.

I have been told that “Belinda McKenzie’s case will be heard on Thursday 10 Jan. 2019″ Friday 11 Jan. 2019  – subject to confirmation.

bm2

 

See the  archive post on SM’s arrest in Dec. 2017 here:

 https://butlincat.com/?s=hampstead+sra

more soon

Hampstead SRA archive is here, with interviews with the children’s parents, and more, as recorded at the time

https://butlincat.com/?s=hampstead+sra

from earlier:

HAMPSTEAD SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE: “ANATOMY OF A COVERUP” – based on The IPCC Appeal document  01 June + Ella interviews


!. ELLA ABEReceived 01/06/16:

“This is based on The IPCC Appeal document and we would encourage supporters to contact the IPCC with thoughts or something along those lines.

ANATOMY of a COVER UP

What exactly did the medical reports state?

The police initially attempted to undermine the findings of Dr Hodes and now state that they never received the reports until January 2015 and therefore were not aware of it’s findings. Is it feasible that the findings of a police instructed doctor are not communicated to the police? The police were fully aware of the contents of the medical reports and the conclusive findings. To understand the position of the police, it is important to know what is contained within the reports as that would explain why it is necessary for the police to keep their position of undermining / ignoring the findings and stating that they did not receive the reports until January 2015, as it did not support their “investigation” strategy.

The examinations of the children by Dr Hodes were on 15th and 16th September 2014, after the children were kidnapped /taken into police custody. During the police “investigation”, Dr Hodes prepared 3 reports dated 15th, 16th and 22nd September respectively.

Conclusion of reports dated 15th September 2014, examination date 12th September 2014.

Both the reports dated 15th September 2014 are addressed to a Chantelle Stevens of Family Services and Social work. The fifth and final page of both reports has an address blacked out. This is the address of the police and the name of the person this report was sent to in the police department. The police have claimed that they did not receive this report until January 2015 .

The medical report states;

“(G) In both the general physical examinations of G today, there are physical signs that are consistent with the allegations given by both G and A. The scar in the anus is from a healed fissure, secondary to the application of a blunt penetrating force that he has alleged. In summary, G has physical signs that support his allegations of both physical and sexual abuse”

“In general physical and genital examination of A today, there was evidence of findings consistent with the allegations given by A. These were of inflicted physical injury – physical abuse and insertion of a blunt penetrating instruments into her anus. The scars in her anus are from healed fissures, secondary to the application of a blunt penetrating force that she has alleged”

Report dated 16th September 2014, examination date 16th September 2014.

This report, drafted after Dr Hodes attended strategy meetings on 8th and 15th September 2014, has details of how both children have been repeating their allegations to the foster carers. Upon seeing Vaseline in a shop, G says “is that what they put on my bottom” referring to abuse “from their dad and his friends including Mr. Hollings“

Within the report;

‘A’ described a ‘plastic willy’ to the foster carer and that their ‘dad makes them in his shed’.

‘A’ describes how “’Vaseline original’ in a square container was used on their ‘bottoms and willies’” and sometimes they inserted “plastic willies in her bottom” but sometimes “real willies”. Both children said it hurt less with real willies but that the perpetrators wanted it to hurt them so they used a plastic willy”.

“They also said that they did not want it to hurt so much that it scarred otherwise their mother might discover this when she bathed them” This suggests that the perpetrators took active measures to ensure that the abuse was kept secret and hidden from the mother, Ella Gareeva.

“They both experienced bleeding from their bottoms afterwards…given a wet tissue to wipe it with. They described how they wiped blood or sometimes ‘white stuff’ that came from willies’.

“When asked why they did not tell their mother whilst this was happening, they said they were too scared as their father had told them that he would kill their whole family if they told”

The report describes how the children have nightmares of their “dad killing them” and G said “that he suddenly remembers what happened and his eyes go blurry. He then sees monsters and if he closes his eyes he sees ‘a picture of his dad killing him”. We cannot begin to imagine the amount of pain and fear G must have been going through when he was hoping that the “good policeman” would believe him and his sister.

“G described that when he stayed at his dad’s house for two or three days
his dad did not let him go to sleep at night” by being “scary” and putting a “monster costume so that he could not go to sleep”

Summary of findings

“Evident that his (G) experience of abuse has had a significant impact on his emotional well-being.

Further general examination today confirms the physical findings of a scar in the anus from a healed fissure, consistent with inflicted injury from a blunt penetrating force that he (G) has alleged”.

In respect of A, the report states “Based on today’s assessment, it is clear that G and A’s experience of abuse have had a significant impact on their emotional wellbeing. Physical findings today FURTHER CONFIRM the allegations of inflicted anal injury from insertion of a blunt penetrative force, and ARE CONSISTENT with A’s allegations of Sexual abuse”

Medical report dated 22nd September 2014

This report was drafted after she attended strategy meetings on 8th and 15th September 2014 (the appendices 1-2 attached to the report contained notes of the strategy meetings but the local authority and the police failed to provide us with this), supervised the consultations for both children on 12th and 16th September 2014 and spoke to Camden Social workers who informed her of the ABE interview on the 17th September 2014.

The report concludes in respect of A:

“The physical injuries found on her (A) skin are consistent with her allegations of physical abuse..

In the absence of a history of constipation, medical illness and accidental trauma ACCORDING TO THE GP NOTES, the anogenital findings of the scar and the RAD are consistent with her allegations of the application of a blunt penetrating force to her anus..sexual abuse.”

The report concludes in respect of G:

“The physical injuries found on his (G) skin are consistent with his allegations of physical abuse..

In the absence of a history of constipation, medical illness and accidental trauma ACCORDING TO THE GP NOTES, the anogenital findings of the scar and the RAD are consistent with his allegations of the application of a blunt penetrating force to his anus..sexual abuse. “
Police interpretation of Dr Hodes findings by choice of words

Please note the medical report’s use of the words that physical injuries “confirm”, “are consistent” and “evidence of findings consistent with” the allegations of sexual abuse as opposed to the police manipulation of the words to describe and deliberately attempt to undermine the findings of Dr Hodes, such as;

1. CRIS report entry by DS Fernandez 13th September “can be the result of a large solid poo” 
2. Police initial response dated 8th July 2015 “could be consistent with allegations of sexual abuse” and 
3. Current response dated 24th March 2016“may have been caused by physical abuse in the absence of a medical explanation. The discussion DS Fernandez had with Dr Hodes were such that she verbally reported inconclusive results on the 12th September 2014”

It is clear, that the police have attempted to undermine the findings of Dr Hodes on several occasions by misrepresenting her findings. This is a tactic we are now familiar with as they have endeavoured to do the same throughout the attempted cover up. 
Even IF the medical reports had stated or used the phrase “could be consistent“ with allegations of sexual abuse, ( which they do not ) this does not negate the duty for the police to investigate further. In fact, it still provides support to the allegations of sexual abuse, as it does not rule it out and therefore is evidence that should be acted upon during the police investigation. 
It is a note of interest that the police report dated 24th March refers to “absence of a medical explanation”. In the medical report of 22nd September Dr Hodes reviewed all GP notes and noted that there was no past history of constipation or other medical condition that could explain the injuries to the anus area of both children. Therefore, Dr Hodes had reviewed the children’s medical history and confirmed there is no other explanation, other than what the children alleged, as to how the injuries to the anus could have been caused. 
In fact, the GP notes attached to Dr Hodes report of 22nd September 2014 confirm that that their Mother was concerned about A’s behaviour on 17 January 2011 as the notes state;

“Mother concerned re A’s behaviour. Father given visitation rights last 3 weeks, sees them weekly. Since then A acting strangely, wakes mid sleep at night in hysterics, cries uncontrollably, clinging to mother, sometimes wakes and throws all bedding off the bed”

FREE THE HAMPSTEAD 2

The race is not for the swift.”

See the official site: http://www.hampsteadcoverup.com

HAMPSTEAD SRA UPDATE 29 FEB. + LEAKED MEDICAL REPORT + ELLA WITNESS INTERVIEWS including ALFRED WEBRE + IPCC REPORT

!. ELLA ABE

29 Feb.2016:

“Whilst Americans and some Europeans deal with the challenges faced by survivors and the families of Ritual Abuse and Trauma Based Mind Control.
The U.K. and other European Governments engaged in Mind Control programs (involving the ritual sacrifice of countless infants) of their citizens,and children within schools and churches persist in denial. The HAMPSTEAD COVER UP is their Black Swan. The captured lame stream media keep the public sedated, distracted and deceived.

The State and their minions have been caught red handed covering up a case of State sponsored mind control program involving Satanic Ritual Abuse. All the guilty concerned are attempting to ignore the problem whilst hoping that it will eventually go away, yet like a cancerous cyst the problem grows daily with the story now reaching a critical mass of concerned citizens world wide. The lost souls have embarked on yet another offensive, due to the increasing public awareness of the case, particularly by Americans who have their own documented history of SRA/TBMC, The Franklin Cover up, The McMartin Pre School scandal etc. Numerous blogs/websites with information from psychotherapists and survivors who far from remaining in denial, are organising regular conferences where they exchange research information regarding solutions and ways to help survivors and their families. The Sun yesterday put out a 3 page hit piece on SRA siting the Hampstead Cover up and a young Nurse named Carol Felstead ?

Regarding the DA Notice. Ella has been in contact with a researcher from Australia who shared that information with us, and apart from the usual suspects’ smear campaign reflecting Pauffley’s fraudulent judgement in March last year this is the first lame stream media coverage of the case in the Sun yesterday. The site the False Memory Syndrome disinfo.

Regarding the False Memory Syndrome Foundation, Columbia Journalism Review stated:

“Rarely has such a strange and little-understood organization had such a profound effect on media coverage of such a controversial matter. The [False Memory Syndrome] foundation is an aggressive, well-financed PR machine adept at manipulating the press, harassing its critics, and mobilizing a diverse army of psychiatrists, outspoken academics, expert defense witnesses, litigious lawyers, Freud bashers, critics of psychotherapy, and devastated parents.”493

The FMSF has repeatedly cited a study presented at a Harvard conference where researchers were repeatedly able to implant the false memory of mundane tasks like grocery shopping, into their subjects using techniques such as hypnosis.494 It has been championed as proof that memories are easily manipulated. However, research has shown that memories of abuse function very differently than average memories.

“However, leading memory researchers such as Dr. Bessel van der Kolk of Harvard Medical School maintain that traumatic memories, which typically are engraved in the sensorimotor processes, are not subject to the same kinds of contamination that can affect normal memory. Traumatic amnesia, described in the DSM-III-R as psychogenic amnesia, is a phenomenon which has been known to mental health professionals for more than 100 years. The clinically observed characteristics of traumatic memory formation and retrieval match precisely the patterns of memory recovery exhibited by SRA [Satanic Ritual Abuse] survivors, and strongly confirm the reality of their cult abuse.”495

Denial serves no one. Neither victims nor perpetrators.
This is not a war. This is an awakening.”

IPCC Upholds Ella Draper’s Appeal [for a 2nd time too – in Jan 2017!]
Posted on February 5, 2016

https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2016/02/05/ipcc-upholds-ella-drapers-appeal/

HAMPSTEAD COVER UP: 22 Dec. ’15 ELLA DRAPER / ABRAHAM CHRISTIE – ED OPPERMAN REPORT

After that interview, this from Ella + Abraham:

“We have been aware of David Shurter as a cointel disinfo shill for a while.http://www.dysgenics.com/tag/lying-fraud/ This was confirmed when he lied about knowing Tavitrained Charlotte Ward/Jaqui Farmer, & then staged a fake public falling out with her in a “secret” Facebook group in order to ingratiate himself with us . They worked together on a video in January 2013.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dokzA0IQLZU

We played along in order to give him enough rope (hemp of course.) He once again exposed his intent, when after arranging an interview with one of his “contacts” a certain Steve, they both persistently attempted to locate us by encouraging us to record the interview via landline. We recorded the interview via Skype, with Shurter and Steve dominating the conversation. We had discussed sharing with their audience the part hempseed nutrition played in the children’s disclosures, but they expressed concern. We explained that the nutritional aspect was an integral part of the case, and they became agitated, so we agreed not to mention it.
Cathy O’brien explains that Cannabis/ Hemp/Marijuana deletes and prevents mind control.
We did NOT argue for an hour and 20 minutes as implied in their latest attempted hatchet job where they expose their obvious intent. We weren’t pleased with the interview, but were grateful for the chance to introduce the case to the American audience. Shurter then organised another interview with Doug Miller, another known F.B.I./C.I.A. agent, which we declined. Shortly after Shurter arranged yet another interview, this time with Ed Opperman.
Opperman obviously knew little of the facts of the case, repeatedly referring to Pauffley’s fraudulent judgement of March 19th 2015. However it wasn’t until we exposed the Trauma Based Mind Control element of the case that he showed his true colours, at one stage denying the veracity of our disclosure by saying,”..but that’s not true”
After the 2 hour show , he requested we do a further hour which we did . We agreed that he would air the show on Christ mass day. He however posted the video on his YT channel on the 22nd of December, and then accused us of leaking the show after 2222 found the show on his YT channel and reposted it. He threatened 2222 with copyright infringement, along with a tirade of verbal abuse insults and accusations.
2222 explained that because Opperman had posted the video on his YT channel it was considered fair game in Child Abuse cases, particularly in this case, where the guilty/State have been attempting to control the narrative and prevent the TRUTH from being revealed. We did tell 2222 & another supporter who were scheduled to interview us that we would do the Opperman interview first as he was waiting and eager. We also recorded the interview using a new mike, as listeners had complained of sound quality of previous interviews.
Ed Opperman seemed genuine, but has accused us of leaking our version to 2222. That is an easily disproven lie, as our vocals on our recording are much clearer due to the new microphone. Why would he do that, and why would we jeopardise the opportunity to reveal the TRUTH to his extensive network of listeners ?
Ed Opperman did express upset at the comments from Dearman’s 40 or so sock puppets,( he created some new socks for Christ Mass)
Youtube pulled 2222’s version but we still have the comments that show Opperman’s true colours.
Neither Opperman nor Shurter have replied to polite emails attempting to resolve what ‘could’ have been a misinnerstanding.
They have however recorded two shows where they blatantly and clumsily attempt to discredit us,( Abraham particularly )
They have been in a Tavispin since we publicly exposed the Tavistate/ British Intelligence, C.I.A. Trauma Based Mind Control aspects of the case, and these accusations are their attempt to discredit us, and control the narrative of the case. They obviously don’t want this info revealed to the U.S. public, and have staged this charade as an excuse not to air the revealing interview.They, (Shurter particularly) are concerned that they are unable to contain the story of State sponsored Mind Control Programs in schools to create an army of New Word Order slaves.
They are unaware that the Hampstead Cover Up is a poisoned chalice to ALL who come with ignoble intent.
The use of Occult practices, Luciferian/Satanic/Wicca, hypnosis, drugs etc. are all elements of State sponsored Trauma Based Mind Control programs, that are used to mislead & cover up the TBMC programs that have infested schools and pre schools/nurseries around the world,so no we haven’t dismissed the occult element in favour of MK Ultra/ Monarch, State sponsored Trauma Based Mind Control programs.We are merely explaining how they all fit together. Their lies and Tavispin are transparent and they are merely the latest to be exposed by the Metaphysics of the Hampstead Cover Up.
Apologies for the length of this explanation, but these agents have dug a rather deep hole which they have proceeded to fall in.
Respect and Best wishes for the New Year.
e & a “

David Shurter: Satanic Ritual Abuse Survivor , Hampstead Theories – “After my Interview… 

David Shurter: “After My Interview with Ed Opperman on the Hampstead Case in the UK” – see more: http://www.davidshurter.com/?p=5511

Mother Ella Draper Witness Statement 21 March 2015

A.L. Webre: Part I: Ella Draper & Abe Christie’stestimony on Hampstead pedophilia the UK High Court excluded 31 March 2015

“HAMPSTEAD COVERUP” – INTERVIEWS with ELLA DRAPER + ABRAHAM CHRISTIE 14 JUNE 2015

HAMPSTEAD COVER-UP on WorldBeyondBelief w/Ella and Abraham

Witness and Victim G.

March 11th, 2015.

Leaked Medical Reports End All Doubt About Sexual Abuse Claims.

The medical reports end any debate regarding the fact that children A and G were the victims of child sexual abuse in Hampstead and underline the criminal nature of the police interviews of September 17th, 2014. The question now is who is being protected? Who has the influence and power to cause the British police such an obvious and inexplicable mid investigation rethink? Clearly there is much more than a Z grade actor and the reputation of a school at stake here. Neither would logically merit the police choice to destroy this investigation and cover up these heinous crimes.

Background Chronology

September 5th 2014.
“A referral was made to the Barnet CAIF by (mother’s partner’s) brother in law who is a special constable. Following a disclosure by A and G that they had been sexually abused by their father and “teachers” and were part of a cult. This disclosure had been made when they were in Morocco over the summer. And the parents stated they were unsure who to inform as many people seemed to be involved, (including allegedly police and social workers.)
Initial police interviews conducted.
8/9/14. Initial strategy meeting held.
10/9/14. Visit to family home ahead of ABE interview.
11/9/14. Emergency Police Protection Order issued after the ABE yesterday evening during which witness A, witness G and witness E (mother) were interviewed separately.
Allegations of physical abuse from the mother’s partner towards both children and sexual abuse against both children by their father and “teachers”. They are now in Emergency Foster Placement.”

17/9/14.
Police conduct the retraction interviews in transparent attempt to bury the truth and vandalise justice.
Interviewing officers clearly bully false retractions from the children for unknown reasons that can only be sinister.
22/9/14. Police inform the mother E that they have found that the crimes against the children cannot be confirmed. The investigation is over.
22/9/14. Dr. Hodes writes the second medical report affirming the veracity of the sexual abuse allegations despite the retractions. Dr. Hodes cites a specific research finding that found that 16% of victims will retract the allegations and affirming therefore that the physical evidence of abuse should outweigh the retractions.

Lindsay C Malloy, MA Thomas D Lyon JD, and Joia A Quas
Fillal Dependency and recantation of Child Sex Abuse Allegations.
J.Am Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 46:2, 2007.

These statements were made without reference to the disgraceful performance of the interviewing officer in the retraction interviews, which only strengthen Dr. Hodes’ assertions.

The Medical Reports. Who wrote them and are they authentic?

There are two Medical Reports, one dated September 15th, 2014, the other September 22nd. Written on the stationary of the University College of London in a way that leaves no doubt as to their authenticity. Background checks on the names of the people who signed the documents end any doubt . To illustrate this I will cite the best known of the Doctors who have signed these reports Dr. Deborah Hodes (FRCPCH) Consultant Community Paediatrician. A cursory internet search indicates that Dr. Hodes is employed in that role at the University College London and is an expert in the field of child abuse having more than twenty years experience.

Dr Deborah Hodes

https://www.uclh.nhs.uk/OurServices/Consultants/Pages/DrDeborahHodes.aspx

The first report dated September 15th appears to have been written by Dr Harriett Gunn (SHO Senior House Officer)* but is also signed by Dr. Hodes, The second Report of September 22nd appears to have been written entirely by Dr. Hodes, as she is the sole signatory.

The Medical Examiners are highly experienced and well qualified.
This does not mean that they are infallible, of course, but these medical reports have been signed by medical practitioners considered to be authorities in the field with decades of experience.
Dr, Deborah Hodes, part of the examination and assessment team that physically examined the children on several occasions is absolutely unequivocal, even after the retraction interviews that the children have physical injuries, that substantiate their claims of physical abuse at the hands of the mother’s partner and more importantly the sexual abuse at the hands of the father and cohorts.

A Brief Overview of the Facts that Emerge from the Medical Reports.
The counter narrative states that the children’s stories were coached and fed to them by their mother’s partner who was himself guilty of minor physical abuse of the children.

The police retraction interviews tried to construct a narrative that the children had been denying the actions of the mother’s partner whilst making the claims against the father and school, yet the Medical Reports show that the children made the claims concurrently and were concurrently examined for both the injuries related to the minor physical abuse at the hands of the mother’s partner and the extremely serious sexual abuse at the hands of the father and staff at the school.
The male has one scar on his anus consistent with blunt force trauma, the female has several and has actually been physically damaged by the abuse in ways that really do not bear mentioning suffice to say that she has multiple injuries “consistent with the application of a blunt instrument.”
They could not be clearer. Someone has been doing deeply unpleasant things to these children, the more lurid claims relating to this case may be exaggerated, but there is a very simple and unmistakeable truth expressed in those medical reports.
After they were taken into Foster care, the children were heard to discuss the use of Vaseline as a lubricant their abusers used on them. They are no longer in the presence of the mother’s partner, there is no need for any story to be told, yet they were speaking about it in a matter of fact way.

The children independently told their story on multiple occasions to numerous Doctors and other disinterested parties and were consistent in their claims against both parties. There was medical evidence to support the claims that were made against both parties.

Both children were observed to be suffering the symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Both children complained at their treatment at the hands of the mothers partner, yet it was absolutely clear to the examiners that it was the father they feared. Each child independently expressed the fear that their father would kill them, one had nightmares about it. Expressions of fear do not get more profound than that.

The details outlined in these reports are deeply unpleasant. Unfortunately it is necessary to do this and I will ensure that only the completely necessary information is included. There is a duty to attempt to spread the truth in a matter of gross injustice such as this case represents and I have sought not to identify anyone by name other than the Doctors whose role appears to have been an honourable one.

Key Excerpts from the Two Medical Reports.

September 15th, 2014.

“Witness G “does not report any history of constipation or diarrhoea . However he does report that it does often hurt and he has often bled when opening his bowels although this had decreased significantly in the past two months which his sister says is because it is two months since they have seen their father. (the children were also removed from the school). He opens his bowels everyday and reports that his stool is soft. “( a detail that is unfortunately necessary due to later events)
Physical Abuse.
“Both G and A report that they have been hit multiple times with a metal spoon by mother’s partner over the head and the legs. They also report they have been pushed into walls. They also allege that mother’s partner holds his hand over their mouth till they “can’t breathe.” On a recent visit to Morocco over the summer witness G explains that he was hit on the ear by the mother’s partner in the left ear which caused his ear to bleed and his left eye to be swollen and bruised. G and A said that G was then not allowed to leave the holiday home until the bruises had disappeared.”
(Note: the details contained here completely destroy the notion that these allegations were made as the result of coaching. Did the mother’s partner also coach the children to make all these detailed and specific allegations against him? Of course he didn’t. The fact that these allegations against the mother’s partner were made at the same time as the allegations of sexual abuse is clearly overwhelming evidence that these children spoke the truth to the best of their ability about both issues and were not under external control of either party to a custody dispute as they made the allegations.)

Sexual abuse allegations.

“ A has explained that at school a teacher named Mr. H calls children over and makes them take off their underwear. A explained that she and other children including G are made to bend over and a “plastic willy” is inserted into the anus. Whilst Mr. H holds onto their hips. A also stated that Mr.H “makes noises” while this is done.

Of note, she says that he gives them a refresher bar to eat as a reward and to chew on while this is happening so they “can’t scream or make a noise” and they are asked to face forwards and not look backwards. G has said that the same thing has happened to him. G says that after this has happened he has bleeding from the anus and subsequently. it is very painful when he opens his bowels.”

Victim G Physical injuries described.
His (G) anus was examined in the left lateral position using gentle buttock separation for 30 seconds. He had one anal fissure scar at 9 o’clock on examination of the anus. There was no reflex anal dilation.”

Summary.
“In both the general physical examination and the genital examination of G today. There are physical signs consistent with the allegations given by G and A. The scar in the anus is from a healed fissure, secondary to the application of a blunt penetrating force that he (G) has alleged.
In summary, G has physical signs consistent with his allegations of both physical abuse and sexual abuse. “
Dr. Harriett Gunn (SHO) to
Dr. Deborah Hodes.
Medical Report Dated September the 22nd 2014.

The report begins with Dr, Hodes outlining her extensive experience in the field. Twenty four years worth.
Dr.Hodes states that she was present at two strategy meetings and two physical examinations relating to this case. In addition Dr. Hodes has spoken to Camden area social workers and also reviewed the photographic evidence pertaining to the children’s injuries.

Victim and WItness A on September 17th 2014.
Victim and Witness A during a Police interview.

Summary of Relevant Evidence Victim A..
“She alleged that lubrication was used prior to the insertion of the penis or plastic penis and identified and discussed this with her foster carer.. She also told me about having had an injection. She alleged that bleeding occurred after the event and then had pain on opening her bowels.”
“She told me that she has difficulty getting to sleep and she has bad dreams including dreaming of her father killing her ”
Physical Findings.
“Below is a list of injuries found in a physical examination of A shown in body maps and the police photographs.”

1.“3 x 4mm abrasion to the pinna of her left ear and 3mm laceration posterior to her left ear overlying the mastoid, A alleged she was pinched and picked up by her ear on Morocco.”

2. “7mm longtitudinal abrasion (excoriated) on the right lateral aspect of her right ankle. A alleged she had been pushed against an outside wall and “had picked it” when she was in Morocco.”

3. “2.0cm x 0.5cm healing abrasion on the left side of the chin. A alleged that she was hit across the face with a metal spoon while in Morocco.“

Below is a list of injuries found on ano-genital examination of A recorded in the DVDs.
(Warning Note: This is deeply unpleasant and awful and a quick summary is that there are multiple and in my opinion horrific injuries to A’s nether regions)
“1. In the left lateral position with gentle buttock separation there was anal laxity and a brief view of the rectum. In the knee chest position with gentle buttock separation, there was reflex anal dilation (RAD) after 5-10 seconds. The reflex anal dilation continued and there was a view into the rectal ampulla and there was no stool present.
2. There was a healed scar in the ruggae at the 10 -11 o’clock position extending from the anal orifice to the anal verge. It was seen in both the left lateral position and the knee to chest position. The abnormalities in the ruggae at the 4 0′ c;ock and 5 o’clock positions may represent healed scar tissue or variation in the ruggae.configuration.”
There are between two and four injuries, with two undoubted and two speculative.
Conclusions regarding the allegations.
“The physical injuries found on her skin are consistent with the physical abuse she described.
In the absence of a history of constipation, medical illness or accidental trauma according to the GP’s notes, the anogenital findings of the scar and the RAD are consistent with her allegations of the application of a blunt penetrating force to her anus (2); sexual abuse.”
She has described symptoms of post traumatic stress.”

Summary of A and G by Dr. Hodes.
“In my opinion A and G are suffering significant harm as evidenced by the following:-
1.Both children have physical signs of physical abuse that support their allegations.
2.Both children have physical signs of sexual abuse that support their allegations.
3.They have symptoms of post traumatic stress.
4. It is now understood from a 2007 substantiated study of child sexual abuse that retraction occurs far more commonly (16% in this series) than previously thought.
5. In my opinion, the extensive and detailed accounts given by both children that were repeated to different professionals contain details of sexual acts that such young children would need to have direct experience of.” (Note: in order to be able to describe them is the unwritten implication.)

To put it simply, Dr. Hodes is stating that there is physical evidence in support of both sets of allegations which really highlights how farcical the entire “they were coached” counter-narrative really is. Because children who have been coached to make false allegations in order to influence a custody battle we are told, were not even coached to lie about the minor physical injuries they suffered at the hands allegedly of the mother’s partner. What kind of coaching is that?
It really shows the desperation to protect that this preposterous and absurd notion was even floated as the counter-narrative. It is pathetic and insulting. Truly laughable.

Dr Hodes signature
Dr. Hodes signs off on the September 22nd report. She plainly rejected the retractions.

Ethical and Legal Issues.

The leaking of these documents may constitute a criminal offense, I honestly do not know, but it is obvious that these records have been released in the broader public interest in order to oppose and expose a clear and outrageous injustice. These are exceptional circumstances in which otherwise unethical or even unlawful actions are necessary and just in my opinion.

Why is this happening?

It beggars belief that this investigation was curtailed and destroyed in order to protect a Z grade actor or even the Staff and Institutional reputation of the school and church involved. Something far more important is being protected here, but it is completely unclear whom or what have managed to engineer the stunning travesty that led to the Investigating Police coaching and bullying retractions from the child victims, Witnesses and Victims A and G.
The real mystery at this point is who is protecting this and why?
The way it is being covered up you would almost get the on it’s face ludicrous idea that this was some type of mad, satanic leadership induction program. The people involved may believe they are doing what is right for their children in some sick parallel universe sense.

We Are Living in a Twilight Zone of Serial Denial.

It is completely possible that elements of the stories the children tell that do not relate to events they actually witnessed may be embellished or even incorrect. There is sadly no doubt that whatever the veracity of the claims the police made a decision, a bizarre and inexplicable decision to destroy the case and conduct a cover up. Unless and until the police have a rethink as is inevitable but may take decades, there is little that can be done to even begin to seek justice for the Hampstead victims beyond trying to expose this to enough people that it causes an uproar that requires an immediate police rethink.

We seem to exist in a bizarre twilight zone where anyone with any connection to power can apparently do what they like to children and expect to suffer only the infamy of the grave. As long as you are not fussed about your reputation when deceased and you are connected you do not even have to be discreet. Once you die it will all emerge of course and your name and reputation will be destroyed but other than that there is no penalty.
While it has become clear again and again that the unthinkable has actually been rather routine, that these unbelievably evil crimes have been happening for decades and yet when confronted with a genuine contemporary cover up, the entire “official” British media have literally not a word to say.

Other than the Hamptead and Highgate Express. The local weekly paper had their say recently, they covered the story from the point of view of the alleged perpetrators, predictably, so the reference to the case was rather incidental, but telling.
Google under fire after leaked personal details of Hampstead residents remain on web – Crime & Court – Hampstead Highgate Express

http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/crime-court/google_under_fire_after_leaked_personal_details_of_hampstead_residents_remain_on_web_1_3967235

The real story is instantly dismissed thus “The claims, which the mainstream media is barred by court order from reporting on, are said to have been investigated by police and found to be baseless.” Which I think can be fairly claimed to be a downright lie. Perhaps gratitude is the right response to the total lack of mainstream news coverage. Please note the brazen hypocrisy of the Hampstead and Highgate Express stating that “ which the mainstream media is barred by court order from reporting on” before continuing “are said to have been investigated by police and found to be baseless.” Clearly reporting (and indeed completely mendaciously and inaccurately) without naming or even alluding to a source, let alone any evidence to back up their dishonest claim. I hope they are proud of their work at the Hampstead and Highgate Express. Their efforts in support of evil will be rewarded in the deserved manner eventually I am sure, one way or another. It’s only a matter of time.

Return #WhistleblowerKids and #AbuseSurvivors to their Russian Family!

Sources + Important Links=

14 09 15 Medical report.pdf – Google Drive

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Byzy22cCtwpdbERtNXNhQ0Y5RmM/edit

14 09 22 Medical report.pdf – Google Drive

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Byzy22cCtwpdYy0xdVZFcGxscXM/edit

Aangirfan: HAMPSTEAD – DOCUMENTS

http://www.aanirfan.blogspot.com.au/2015/03/hampstead-documents.html

Aangirfan: FROM HAMPSTEAD TO SAN FRANCISCO

http://www.aanirfan.blogspot.com.au/2015/03/from-hampstead-to-san-francisco.htm

Royal Free Hospital in Hampstead to be investigated over links with Jimmy Savile – Health – Hampstead Highgate Express

http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/health/royal_free_hospital_in_hampstead_to_be_investigated_over_links_with_jimmy_savile_1_3058052

PLAYLIST of 45 videos re #Whistleblower and #WhistleblowerKids | ‘Whistleblower Kids’ in the Court of Public Interest

https://whistleblowerkids.wordpress.com/2015/03/01/playlist-of-45-videos-re-whistleblower-of-whistleblowerkids/

JUSTICE DENIED: Live Recording as Police raid Pedophile Ring Whistle-blower kids mum’s home

http://google-law.blogspot.gr/2015/02/live-recording-of-police-raid-on.html

Abusers Online | ‘Whistleblower Kids’ in the Court of Public Interest

https://whistleblowerkids.wordpress.com/social-media/links-to-videos/abusers-online/

‘Whistleblower Kids’ in the Court of Public Interest | From Child Snatching and the Secrecy of Family Courts to Forced Adoptions, Child Sexual Exploitation and Satanic Ritual Abuse

https://whistleblowerkids.wordpress.com/

JOINING Video Dots with #WhistleblowerKids: Exposing World run by Powerful #Paedophiles | ‘Whistleblower Kids’ in the Court of Public Interest

https://whistleblowerkids.wordpress.com/2015/03/06/joining-video-dots-with-whistleblowerkids-exposing-world-run-by-powerful-paedophiles/

Dr Deborah Hodes

https://www.uclh.nhs.uk/OurServices/Consultants/Pages/DrDeborahHodes.aspx

FORWARD UK on Twitter: “FORWARD Trustee, Dr Deborah Hodes, announces opening of the first specialist #FGM clinic in London

ZeeklyTV – Anonymous’s Channel

http://zeeklytv.com/user/Anonymous

Dr Hodes Sources.
Lindsay C Malloy, MA Thomas D Lyon JD, and Joia A Quas
Fillal Dependency and recantation of Child Sex Abuse Allegations.
J.Am Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 46:2, 2007.

Bradley Ar, Wood, JM, How Do Children Tell?
The disclosure process in child sexual abuse.
Negl. 20 881-891. 1996

The British Medical Association Confidentiality Guide for Staff.(called the confidentiality toolkit)

confidentialitytoolkit_full.pdf

http://bma.org.uk/-/media/files/pdfs/practical%20advice%20at%20work/ethics/confidentialitytoolkit_full.pdf

Excerpts Relevant to this Case.

1. The duty of confidentiality
Confidentiality is an essential requirement for the preservation of trust between patients and health professionals and is subject to legal and ethical safeguards. Patients should be able to expect that information about their health which they give in confidence will be kept confidential unless there is a compelling reason why it should not. There is also a strong public interest in maintaining confidentiality so that individuals will be encouraged to seek appropriate treatment and share information relevant to it.

Using and disclosing information
3. data should be anonymised wherever possible .
occasionally, when it is not practicable to obtain consent, information may be disclosed where the law requires or where there is an overriding public interest, eg where child abuse is suspected
• disclosures should be kept to the minimum necessary to achieve the purpose
5. Anonymisation
Information may be used more freely if the subject of the information is not identifiable in any way.
Usually, data can be considered to be anonymous where clinical or administrative information is separated from details that may permit the individual to be identified such as name, date of birth and postcode. Even where such obvious identifiers are missing, rare diseases, drug treatments or statistical analyses which have very small numbers within a small population may allow individuals to be identified. A combination of items increases the chances of patient identification.
When anonymised data will serve the purpose, health professionals must anonymise data to this
extent and, if necessary, take technical advice about anonymisation before releasing data. Whilst it is not ethically necessary to seek consent for the use of anonymised data, general information about when their data will be anonymised should be available to patients.

http://www.abbreviations.com/term/1407008

*S.H.O Senior House Officer A junior doctor in the pre Modernising Medical Careers era (pre-2007) of training in the UK, in the 2nd post-graduate year–i.e., immediately after the PRHO–pre-registration house officer year, which is now designated Foundation Year 1–FY1. SHOs are now called FY-2. Some SHO posts still exist and are taken as a prelude to certain specialities–e.g., surgery, but are no longer a standard year in training schemes for junior doctors in the UK

source: http://crimesofempire.com/2015/03/11/hampstead-leaked-medical-reports-end-all-doubt-about-sexual-abuse-claims/

 ——————————————————————————————————————

FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit: 
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

NB: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Melanie Shaw: Update: factsheet letter can be sent to MPs, media etc. + Single person protest outside parliament 18/12/2018 VIDEO – 09 Jan. 2019

Received, [thanks to PO].  

The following  factsheet can be sent to MPs, media etc:

See the archive:  https://butlincat.com/?s=melanie+shaw

Justice for Melanie Shaw on facebook:

Single person protest outside parliament 18 Dec. 2018

On 18th December 2018 a protest to raise awareness of political prisoner and child abuse victim Melanie Shaw took place on the green opposite the Houses of Parliament. 

Vid 1 – https://www.brighteon.com/5984872360001

Vid 2 – https://www.brighteon.com/5984485240001

previously:

BREAKING MELANIE SHAW FOUND GUILTY BY KANGAROO COURT (17/10/18) #FREEMELANIESHAW

from

Free Melanie Shaw #FreeMelanieShaw

MELANIE SHAW IS A VULNERABLE ADULT WHO HAS BEEN IMPRISONED EVEN THOUGH THE POLICE AND PROSECUTORS HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO BRING ANY EVIDENCE AGAINST HER IN COURT. SHE IS FRIGHTENED AND SUFFERING IN A PRISON WHICH HAS A BAD NAME FOR BULLYING, AND SHE HAS BEEN REMANDED THERE DESPITE NO EVIDENCE BEING PRODUCED AGAINST HER.

OPINION IS THAT SHE HAS BEEN IMPRISONED DUE TO BEING AN ABUSE VICTIM AND AND WITNESS AT A LOCAL COUNCIL RUN CHILDREN’S HOME, BEECHWOOD, IN NOTTINGHAM

Here is a quote from the UK column’s report on the matter: Members of the public present at the hearing in Nottingham Crown Court on Friday 25th July 2014, described a muddled hearing in which the prosecution simply failed to present evidence, despite the Judge prompting them with references to a finger or palm print. In what was described as a fumbling statement to the Judge, the prosecution excused the lack of evidence and promised it would be available ‘shortly.’ Despite the absence of evidence against her, her status as a vulnerable abuse victim and her importance as a key witness to widespread child abuse, the Judge was happy to place Melanie on remand, at a prison in which she has already suffered bullying, strip searches, denial of her NHS medication and disorientation through repeated relocation between cells.

The rest of the report can be read here:

 http://www.ukcolumn.org/article/abuse-witness-melanie-shaw-remanded-no-evidence-presented

Considering the fact that Melanie Shaw has not been charged with anything, and is vulnerable, leaving her in prison, where she is being bullied and is in fear, is completely unjust and uncalled-for and is putting her at risk and harming her mental health.

There are widespread concerns that this shaky and unrealistic trial and imprisonment have been put together because Melanie is an abuse survivor and witness of abuse at Beechwood Children’s Home in Nottingham.

And, if she is left in prison and continues to suffer, her deterioration may be used against her to discredit her. It is inevitable that a vulnerable adult will be frighted and under stress in an environment such as the one she is in, and as a result will deteriorate, especially as it appears she is not being treated well or well cared for, and the reality is, she should not be in prison for months when she hasn’t been charged with anything.

It is extremely common for police and authorities to have little understanding of the distress and trauma that abuse survivors go through and to use such distress against the survivor and treat them as if they are seriously mentally ill and label them as such. I understand this may be what is happening or will happen in Melanie’s case, and this may be why the police and courts excuse putting her in prison without charge, but the reality is, even if she was seriously mentally ill, prison is NOT a suitable environment for someone who is seriously mentally ill to the point of needing to be locked in, it is a place where any such illness would only get worse, and, mental illness is not a crime to be punished in such a way.

There is no excuse for Melanie Shaw’s imprisonment and there is no excuse for the way the police and authorities have treated her. She is a vulnerable abuse survivor not an evil offender, and she needs to be released and return to some normality in her life before the harm done becomes irreparable.

Here is another article on Melanie’s case, written by ‘We are change Edinburgh’:

http://wacedinburgh.wordpress.com/2014/07/31/abuse-witness-melanie-shaw-remanded-no-evidence-presented/

There is no doubt in the eyes of the public that things are very amiss with the handling of this case, and that as a result, a vulnerable adult is imprisoned, suffering at risk, when if she has not been charged, the best place for her to be, for her own wellbeing, is at home.

Please join us in asking for Melanie Shaw to be freed. Please sign the petition.

Thank you.

Melanie Shaw: “Robert Green’s letter to the Chris Leslie, Labour MP of political prisoner Melanie Shaw – WHAT ARE YOU DOING ABOUT IT?” 25 July 2018 + TIMELINE + archive VIDEOs

Robert Green’s letter to the Chris Leslie, Labour MP of political prisoner Melanie Shaw – WHAT ARE YOU DOING ABOUT IT?

  ANDREW CHEETHAM

From: Robert Green 
Sent: 23 July 2018 14:05 
To: chris.leslie@parliament.uk 
Subject: Melanie Shaw 

Dear Mr Leslie, 

I have contacted you, as have many others over the years, about the disgraceful ongoing plight of your constituent Melanie Shaw. 

I do not propose to go through the details of this case, as I feel confident that you have been fully informed about the state`s unrelenting persecution of this poor, defenceless and acknowledged victim of multiple sexual abuse, committed whilst in the supposed ‘care’ of the Nottinghamshire authorities. Indeed, one local authority employee, Andris Logins, has been convicted of multiple rapes committed at the very care home in which Melanie was placed. and sentenced to 20 years imprisonment. His wife , Helen Logins, another Nottingham council social worker, has also been convicted for aiding and abetting her husband. 

We now know, due to recent revelations, that the British government is perfectly capable, not only of being complicit in torture, but also even prepared to publicly lie about it, as demonstrated by the misconduct of Jack Straw. At least, one excuse, weak though it is, was that such torture was used on suspected foreign terrorists operating outside the United Kingdom. 

Melanie Shaw, on the other hand, is a Nottingham woman and UK national who has apparently been tortured in British prisons because of the evidence she is prepared to put before the IICSA, in providing details of serious crimes committed at Beechwood Home that may implicate high-ranking public individuals , including, I understand, a person formerly a colleague of the current Prime Minister. 

As Melanie is clearly an absolutely crucial, high-profile witness in the IICSA investigation into widescale child sexual abuse in the Nottingham area, I found it shocking that the Inquiry has not already interviewed her, regardless of the incarceration that can only be explained rationally as a means of silencing her. 

I have therefore sent key details to the IICSA`s current head, Professor Alexis Jay and her deputy, Liz Long, has written to me to confirm that these details have indeed been read by Professor Jay. 

There can now be no further excuse for the failure to interview Melanie. 

As her elected parliamentary representative, what are you going to do about it? 

Yours sincerely, 

Robert Green 

source: https://www.davidicke.com/article/486578/robert-greens-letter-chris-leslie-labour-mp-political-prisoner-melanie-shaw

Archive:  https://butlincat.com/?s=melanie+shaw

TIMELINE 

News Feed
August 12 2018 at 11:44 AM

Timeline of key events relating to Melanie Shaw.

•Born October 1971.
•3-4 years old – raped and abused by own family.
•Abused by foster family.
•1987 – Year she went to Beechwood Children’s Home, Nottingham.
•Circa 1989 – was allowed to leave Beechwood.
•No help by any services so a life on the streets and drugs.
•Met partner.
•1991 – had a son.
•2003 – had a second son.
•August 2010 – Melanie was in a stable, loving relationship and now had the courage to report Beechwood to the police.
•Other people also came forward.
•2011 – police investigating child abuse do so under one banner – Operation Daybreak.
•By May 2015 – more than 130 people had made allegations which are being investigated by the Operation Daybreak team.
•A total of 12 people – not all of whom worked at or had any connection with the home – have been arrested in connection with the allegations and two people have been charged with serious sexual offences.
•2014 – Melanie continuing to fight stating that even though numerous care homes have been shut down the cover up by the police and council has been going on for over 40 years and is protecting people in Westminster.
•2014 – Melanie discovered that Nottingham Police had lied about the conduct of the investigation (lied about the interviewing of witnesses).
•2014 – ongoing police harassment.
•2014 – child taken by social services.
•10.7.2014 – unknown police action.
•11.7.2014 – secret court hearing.
•25.7.2014 – 17.10.14 – held on remand in Sodexo high security prison, Peterborough on charges of ‘Arson reckless and criminal damage’. During this time she was held in solitary confinement and claims she was sexually assaulted. 
•30.10.2014 – after a 3 day trial at Nottingham Crown Court found guilty of arson reckless and criminal damage.
•6 weeks bail for psychiatric assessments and sentence. 
•November 2014 – met with her MP, Chris Leslie, who she claims has been supportive for the past two years. 
•11.12.2014 – sentenced to 3 years probation in Nottingham. 
•December 2014 – becomes more outspoken of which MPs assaulted boys from Beechwood.
•2015 – Sent to HMP Peterborough for ‘false imprisonment of a paramedic’. Held in solitary confinement. 
•22.6.2015 – released from HMP Peterborough. Details unclear but was told she had ‘served her sentence’.
•3.7.2015 – arrested by Devon and Cornwall police after visiting Plymouth to take a break from the harassment by Nottingham Police.
•4.7.2015 – released by Devon and Cornwall Police.
•22.7.2015 – arrested by Nottingham Police – Melanie suffers PTSD – supposedly Melanie is harassing Superintendent Chamberlain, Melanie’s original police contact when she blew the whistle. 
•23.7.2015 – released after 27 hours in custody.
•Circa 25.7.2015 – interview with Anna Bragga (video available on YouTube).
•Ongoing police harassment. 
•Circa 26.7.2015 – unlawfully held for over 24 hours by Nottingham Police (reason unknown).
•3.10.2015 – posts video message on Facebook questioning what exactly has she done wrong. 
•11.1.2016 – given a two year custodial sentence in a secret court hearing – appeared via video link from prison (reason for being in prison unknown).
•Since end of May 2016, Melanie has been in prison (first Foston Hall, then Eastwood Park then moved to Styal where she remains).
•HMP Styal, Cheshire. Most of Melanie’s incarceration has been in solitary confinement. 
•2.6.2018 – due to be released.
•Release did not happen.
•June 2018 – Linda Lauderdale sent letters to Chris Leslie (Melanie Shaw’s MP), Equality and Human Rights Commission, Lord Glenarthur, and the Secretary of State for Justice. 
•7.8.2018 – 1 charge of sexual assault and 3 charges of arson dating from February 2017 at Leeds Crown Court.
•Case adjourned for 6 weeks.
•Melanie remains in prison in HMP Styal.

fromhttps://www.facebook.com/groups/302194089973223/permalink/933495480176411/?__tn__=K-R

THE SILENCING and TARGETING OF MELANIE SHAW: court non appearance – 03 July 2018 + archive

7 July, 2018 

To: Amnesty International UK, 

Human Rights Action Centre, 

17-25 New Inn Yard,

LONDON,EC2A3EA

Dear Amnesty International, 

Open letter: Melanie Shaw

With reference to your office’s telephone conversation last week with former Nobel Peace Prize nominee, Robert Green, I am concerned that he received no assurance that you are willing to take up Melanie’s case with the UK government. 

I note an item on your website detailing the persecution of Ola al-Qaradawy, in Egypt, and find myself comparing her treatment with that meted out to Melanie in England. 

Ola is condemned to 365 days of solitude.  Melanie has already suffered some 600 days of solitary confinement in various UK prisons. 

Ola will pass her sentence in a small cell without bed, ventilation or toilet.  Melanie has already spent months of incarceration in a small cell, without privacy even when she goes to the toilet. 

Ola will be denied visits from friends and family.  Melanie has been denied contact with friends and family, including her lay legal advisor and a social worker calling to ensure that she was being treated decently.  Worst of all, soon after she became a whistleblower her young son was taken from her and put into foster care.  Since then she has rarely been permitted to see him. 

Ola will be allowed no pen, no paper, no books.   It is difficult to know whether Melanie is allowed these luxuries, as despite the many cards and letters sent to her by friends and supporters scarcely a reply has been received over the past couple of years. 

For 365 days Ola will hear the screams of other prisoners.   Melanie would sympathise with her situation.  She too has been exposed to screams from neighbouring cells during her time in various prisons, where, she states, fellow prisoners have been raped and mistreated.  But Melanie has not only been forced to experience such attacks vicariously:  she has herself been repeatedly strip-searched, and threatened and assaulted by rogue prison staff decked out in riot gear. 

Ola will face 365 days of “limiting her food intake, because she will be limited to a 5-minute use of the toilet daily”.  Again, I do not know how much food Melanie is permitted.  What I do know is that she has been denied the medication which she needs to keep on an even keel since suffering repeated rape and abuse as a child and adolescent, both at the hands of her parents and foster-parents and while in State “care”, and, in addition, witnessing the rape, torture and murder of other children at Beechwood children’s home in Nottingham.  Melanie has a photographic memory, and without this medication she is subject to appalling nightmares, daytime terrors, and unpredictable behaviour.  During her first term of imprisonment she was even denied medication for an infected boil on her leg (see photograph attached).  The infection became so virulent that when she eventually appeared in court, after months on remand, she could only walk with the aid of crutches. 

However brutal Ola’s treatment, she at least enters her ordeal as a woman who has apparently always enjoyed the support of a close and loving family.  Melanie, by contrast, endured an early life in which those to whom she would naturally look for love and support not only failed to provide these basic essentials but repeatedly destroyed her trust with physical attacks and violations.  I think you will agree that she is every bit as deserving of your support as her Egyptian counterpart. 

Perhaps you are unwilling to back Melanie because you do not consider her to be a political prisoner.  Those who have followed her case over the past four years are convinced that she is.   After succumbing for some years to the petty crime and drug abuse which are the frequent legacy of time a children’s home, she somehow, with the help of a loving relationship and the birth of her second son, pulled her life together, and lived for many years as a useful and well-respected member of her local community.  It was only after she plucked up courage to report her experiences at Beechwood to Nottingham Police, and complained when they failed to investigate her allegations thoroughly, that she drew the attention of the authorities.  Since then she has received severe sentences for a succession of questionable or trivial offences, and no account has ever been taken of her inherent vulnerability: indeed, the authorities appear to be going out of their way to unbalance her fragile equilibrium, presumably with a view to silencing her well-evidenced allegations of high-level establishment involvement in crimes against children.  Members of the government, including Theresa May herself, both during her time as home secretary and as prime minister, have been fully informed of Melanie’s case, and have taken no steps to help her, even when she was kept in solitary confinement for more than eighteen months, in direct contravention of the guidelines of UN Special Rapporteur Juan E Méndez and of the UK’s own prison regulations regarding vulnerable women. 

On 31 May this year I sent an open letter (attached) to the present minister for justice, Rory Stewart.  It contained the following passage: 

You, Mr Stewart, as Minister of State for Justice, must brush aside the data-protection fig leaf and answer the questions I have been asking in relation to Melanie’s in-camera conviction if I, and many others asking those same questions, are to be convinced that we are still living under the rule of law.  Unless you give me some credible answers, I can only conclude that;

    • no reasonable justification can be offered for Melanie’s prolonged incarceration and inhumane treatment;
    • that she is, indeed, a political prisoner; and
    • that the Government is hiding behind the Data Protection Act in order to protect interests other than those of law-abiding British subjects.

If I receive no response from you which offers a reasonable challenge to these conclusions, I shall assume that you, personally, admit them to be correct. 

The minister did not respond. 

In a further open letter on 20 June (also attached), this one to the secretary of state for justice, Lord Chancellor David Gauke, I duly noted: “The justice minister, Rory Stewart, has admitted, by default, that there is no reasonable justification for Melanie’s prolonged incarceration and inhumane treatment;  that she is, in fact, a political prisoner; and that government ministers are hiding behind the Data Protection Act for the benefit of interests other than those of law-abiding British subjects.”  Mr Gauke, like Mr Stewart, has not questioned the accuracy of these statements.  One can only assume that although he is unwilling to tell an untruth he is equally unwilling to tell it like it is.  It seems, then, that the UK government is only interested in upholding human rights in cases where it can preach to other nations from a position of fraudulent superiority. 

There is widespread indignation against Amnesty among those who are shocked by your apparent indifference to Melanie’s treatment at the hands of the British State.  In particular, the question of State funding is repeatedly mentioned.  Although you claim complete independence, you admit that you receive regular contributions from the government for “human rights education”.  These appear to be sizeable sums and, whatever use you put them to, must surely compromise your impartiality.   After all, your employees in the field concerned will be reliant at least to some extent on this bounty, and you may naturally be reluctant to bite the hand which feeds you. 

Please prove your lack of bias by looking again at Melanie’s case.  As previously stated, she is every bit as deserving of your intervention as Ola. 

Gillian Swanson  MA (Oxon) 

Sent to Amnesty International UK website: 

MELANIE SHAW : CHILD ABUSE VICTIM, SURVIVOR, WHISTLE-BLOWER AND NOW POLITICAL PRISONER OF UK GOVERNMENT 

Anyone seeking the truth is open and honest. They go where the evidence leads them. They refuse to compromise their ideals and integrity. 

History attests to the fact that individuals and organisations whose original mandate was to reveal the truth and expose government wrongdoing, have often been compromised through infiltration by agent provocateurs. 

My first question is : is Amnesty International a much reduced and compromised organisation that has lost its “without fear or favour” badge? 

As you will know better than me, there are legislative standards for the care of prisoners in this Country set out in documents known as Prison Service Orders. These Orders are very specific and relate to the proper humane treatment of prisoners, both to protect their physical and mental welfare and uphold their dignity in the pursuit of their future rehabilitation back into society. In addition, you will be aware that there are Prison Service Orders which are specific to the particular needs of female prisoners. A perfect example is the set of rules related to female prisoners who exhibit the tendency to self harm. 

As I understand it Melanie Shaw is a child abuse victim, survivor and whistle-blower who has exposed the abuse she both saw and received whilst in the “care” of Nottingham’s Beechwood Children’s Home. 

With the direct involvement of the Home Office, the Judiciary, Nottinghamshire Police and the Prison Service, Melanie Shaw has been incarcerated without charge for more than 2 years. A large part of this time she was held in solitary confinement that constitutes torture under International Law. She has been denied her basic human rights; something the Government are quick to denounce when the perpetrators are some foreign power. If only the wider British public knew what was being done in their name !! 
The evidence is overwhelming, yet Amnesty International appears to be silent on the issue. My real question is : why is Amnesty International silent on this issue that shames the British people and would bring Parliament into disrepute? 
It is said that you can find out who controls you by looking at who you are not allowed to criticise. Food for thought.  [ends]

See earlier posts here:

 https://butlincat.com/?s=melanie+shaw

FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

NB: DISCLAIMER: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.

“Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment
%d bloggers like this: