Maurice Kirk is serving a 2 year sentence in HMP Parc because, it is deemed, he breached a restraining order that was never served on him in the first place according to UK law [see previous updates regarding the scandal surrounding this entire subject].
A letter dated 1st Febuary was received today from Maurice – still on hunger strike in HMP Parc. In the letter are described the continuing serious irregularities performed by the HMP Parc prison service, perhaps the most serious being vital medications are still denied Maurice, [which have been denied him for “7 weeks” he states], and also vital hospital appointments are still denied him. Regarding the medications being denied, which must be taken immediately before food is taken in order for them to be effective [he has a probable “split diaphragm” in his stomach, + other serious ailments], the prison continues to deny him his prescribed medication – a basic human right that the prison are obliged to follow, but communications to UK and Welsh government agencies concerning this glaring breach of Maurice’s Human Rights [and also the breach of this prison’s own guidelines] by many UK citizens prove futile and ignored. Maurice remarks in his latest communication that the bizarre excuse was used by the prison staff that they had actually “lost” the container that the medications were stored in, thus denying him yet again his medication, but when they find it they will dispense it to him – a promise that wasn’t kept!
Maurice writes also that:
he has locked in his cell for 24 hrs / day, and been denied post “for 5 days”!
On going to the room allocated for the dispensing of medications to inmates, he was denied his medication yet again, Maurice states that he is “on report” for the 2nd time for not leaving the ground floor door of the medical room where there is a hatch where the medications are dispensed to inmates. Being “on report” and being found “guilty” by the prison authorities will cause an inmate to be punished. eg. to lose his canteen, or other similar restrictions that are deemed “priveleges” by the prison service. Maurice states that this is the “2nd time” he has been placed “on report”.
He has it confirmed “in writing” from the prison that he is indeed registered a “MAPPA 3, Cat. 3” subject, after it was reported that this allocation was said to have been abandoned in years past. However, the reasons for such an serious registration being in place now has not been explained in any form by anyone he’s contacted and asked – within the prison or outside of it – another glaring breach of Maurice’s rights. Perhaps any UK or Welsh government agency will not concede the fact that this allocation of Maurice being a MAPPA subject was already abandoned some time ago – and why will noone answer Maurice’s question to them asking why he is subjected to this registration? The governments and its agencies are obliged to inform any subject the reasoning for any MAPPA registration. But not for Maurice, it seems!
Maurice writes that he has been denied his prison canteen “for 2 weeks”, meaning stamps are denied him for the sending of letters – which means he is denied sending many letters to court officials and authority figures regarding this present term of most questionable imprisonment, along with numerous other miscarriages of justice performed in the past that have been forced upon him, including letters regarding his MAPPA registration, of course. Naturally the governments know this present and entire conviction and it’s resulting term of 2 years imprisonment imposed on Maurice is riddled with errors and flaws and legal irregularities, thus anything to deny him writing to anyone in order to try and attempt justice regarding the inhuman and barbaric tortures imposed and being imposed upon him at present. Maurice had 30+ legal cases ongoing against mostly Welsh authorities, especially the S. Welsh police, those cases being blocked now because of completely erroneous reasons concocted by the same authorities complained of in order that justice cannot be done. Since 2009 Maurice, 72, has served over 6 years in prison – each term on the most highly questionable of grounds, eg. in the past Maurice has been locked up for months on end on remand in a Welsh prison, before being released with the charges all being mysteriously dropped – with no compensation or proper explanation ever being given to him regarding the loss of these 6+ years of his life spent behind bars for no good reason. Such is the Welsh legal system regarding Maurice Kirk, who’s only “fault” is to try and show the utter deceit and dishonesty flourishing within the Welsh police and connected agencies. It is truly a disgrace and a public scandal that has blighted Maurice’s life for over 23 years – and it is still ongoing in HMP Parc!
Received 03 Feb. 2018. M states he’s on hunger strike since last w/end due to still no meds or access to doctor. He writes he’s been given a MAPPA certificate after trying to establish his status – he asks WHY … Continue reading →
As shown in other recent posts, certain solicitors have been paid £20000+ by Maurice, but he’s let down by them for no good reason: “THOSE WHO HAVE IGNORED MY LETTERS SINCE 14 DECEMBER 2018”, including CERTAIN SOLICITORS: 4th RESTRAINING ORDER … Continue reading →
Received 29 Jan. 2018: RCJ 1CF03361 – 201704259B4 JL 1] IMB have answered not one query from me in HMP Swansea or G4S controlled HMP Parc – so it was on no surprise to me that the prison chaplain Phil … Continue reading →
Further notes received 19 Jan. 2018 from Maurice Kirk explain his present completely unacceptable situation in HMP Parc. He is serving an extremely questionable 2 year term of imprisonment imposed on the 14 December 2017 at Cardiff Crown Court for … Continue reading →
The ourageous hostilities against Maurice Kirk continue during his stay in HMP Parc, Bridgend – he is still denied vital medication for no conceivable reason, the medication already prescribed to him before he entered prison. Prearranged hospital appointments are also … Continue reading →
Today 16 Jan. 2018 letters [below] were received from Maurice, who is being treated appallingly, as usual, in HMP Parc, Bridgend, Wales. He writes that he is still refused phone calls out to friends / family, and also that he … Continue reading →
Received 10 Jan. 2018: Regarding this former state employed doctor TW with his friends in high policing roles back then and his totally false “report” stating MK had a “brain tumour” and was a “danger to himself and society” and … Continue reading →
Communications received from Maurice Kirk today not only tell of the illegal denial of his basic rights whilst serving a term of imprisonment, but also the blatant miscarriages of justice that occurred at his sentencing hearing on the 14 December … Continue reading →
Maurice writes from HMP Parc – letter dated 28 Dec. 17 – he was sentenced to 2 years imprisonment at Cardiff Crown Ct. on the 14 December for the alleged “breach of a restraining order” again – an order that … Continue reading →
Carol Woods = “It is a highly complex matter which the police organise where they try to make me someone I am not. They have in fact tried to invent me as the reverse of myself using numerous characters, including “neighbours” who live alongside myself, and others elsewhere – the entire situations going back years. I find things out because I am not stupid. See my original w’blowing blog York LGO Blog re Lancashire CC http://criticalreader2006.blogspot.ae/ you will see why I am hounded by lowlife RECRUITED to do that by the Gestapo.
After sending the latest complaint by way of 20 pages of printed notes [pic above] by recorded delivery to the IPT [Investigatory Powers Tribunal] regarding the illegal installing of a GPS device in Carol Wood’s car by Lancs. police, and then phoning them weeks later [as I’d had no acknowledgement to the 20 pages] and finding out they “hadn’t received” these notes, despite the recorded delivery being signed for at their correct location [see the signed receipt below], then being told in that same call to send them again with their official forms, and then waiting months for some kind of progress regarding the illegal GPS tracking device I received the letter below which tells that all was a waste of time, and money. This complete ignoring of a complaint by the IPT regarding Lancs. police’s clear breach the Data Protection Act [and European Convention of Human Rights Article 8, which concerns a citizen’s privacy, etc. – see below] surely shows the lawlessness rampant throughout the chronic and completely unacceptable and hostile targeting of Carol Woods by a police force – Lancs. police force – and their cronies in high places, including the Lancs. county council, Royal Mail and other household names who continue to break the law on an almost daily basis!! So, the IPT don’t want to know, with at least 3 letters from the Home Office telling me to go to the IPT, and the IPCC have already said they’ed be sending anything sent to them regarding Lancs. police back to Lancs. police, it all proves a complete and utter waste of time, and Lancs. police have carte blanche to break the laws exactly how they like with no one in the UK government calling them to account. Carol Woods is no “jihadi terrorist” or a member of any Mafia – she is a completely harmless old age pensioner who is a retired top social worker and Child Protection Officer and Probation Officer and who spent her entire working career [for Lancs. county council, amongst others] in service to others – especially vulnerable children! Lancs. police’s [and others] problem is that Carol blew the whistle on rampant corruption – see Carol’s original w’blowing 2006 blog post “York LGO Blog re Lancashire Co. Council” http://criticalreader2006.blogspot.ae/ which explains why the abhorrent and complex targeting began – targeting that includes an infinite number of serious crimes enacted by officials, plus a] organised gangstalking by recruited neighbours she’s forced to endure daily [many of these recruited neighbours being unemployed thugs who are rewarded for their crimes out of the public purse – everything organised – it is alleged – by Lancs. police!], b] infinite DWP / Social Security frauds, c] infinite ID frauds using Carol’s credentials [Carol’s ID being got my R. Mail fraudulent deliveries of her mail to adjoining criminal neighbours who then use the ID gleaned for criminal purposes], and so much more she’s forced to experience daily – and has been forced to experience for years – ALL PAID FOR BY THE TAXPAYER – see “Harassment as punishment for whistle-blowing: Lancashire” http://criticalreader17.blogspot.ae/2017/02/harassment-as-punishment-for-whistle.html which details just some of her targeting.
Also – along with numerous MPs and government agencies [from the P.M. down] including the IPCC, the IPT, and Lancs. police themselves, the HMIC [Her Majesty’s Inspector of Constabularies] totally ignore recent communications sent to them too regarding this ongoing blatant and extremely serious lawbreaking by a police force acting as a crime cartel does – resulting in complete and utter lawlessness!!! [see “MESSAGE TO HMIC BOSS – 13 DEC. 2017 + archive .
Below, the I.P.T. reject the notification to them regarding rampant lawbreaking by Lancs. police:
This is the R. Mail signed recorded delivery receipt [signature deliberately distorted] connected to the original communication with 20 pages of notes which, I was told, “didn’t arrive” at the IPT, although this signature surely shows the opposite. The repeat sending of the same notes were sent in exactly the same way, to the same postal address, and were received perfectly well but, as the letter above shows, all was a waste of time regarding the installation of the GPS tracking device in the car although it surely clearly breaches the most basic of Data Protection laws as well as Article 8 of the E.C.H.R. [see below]:
WHAT is happening to Carol Woods, with her constant surveillance by the authorities and gangstalking by recruited yobs, along with others must surely be a “specialist operation“ undertaken by Lancs. police. Is it not interesting that:
Chief Constable [Merseyside police at present, formerly of Lancs. police]
Specialist operations? What is happening to Carol Woods is surely a “Specialist Operation“!
He also led the ACPO Witness Protection programme in 2015 when this radio programme was made – see @ 9mins 30secs into this video https://vimeo.com/177346278 on certain failings of that operation.
Numerous communications have been sent to Mr. Cooke, and many others at Lancs. police regarding the deplorable targeting of Carol Woods, beginning in 2006 – everything has been ignored – see the recent update where Carol’s car was vandalised, but the local police refused to even acknowledge the crime:
On 18 December 2017 at 19:02, carol woods <email@example.com> wrote:
Dear Sirs, I called into Lancaster University and as usual via the ILLEGAL GPS on my car which you all know about and do nothing about to assist me, the Gestapo arrange ANOTHER FRAUD and thug with trollop in “met with” farce INTENDED TO FORGERY and DEFRAUD ME. I attach here YET AGAIN the PROOF that the thugs in Lancashire have pretended for YEARS that I have met with lowlife when I have not. Not one person responded to the PROOF of FORGERY, FRAUD and worse. Thus I leave the uni library and a local roughneck had been sent to stand about and “hide” outside but to walk as if “with me” when I left. (YOU FUND ALL THIS PROVIDING TAXIS ETC.) She had the PINK BAG which the Gestapo use in lunacy to pretend the user is me or my daughter. The reason is out of scope of this but the reason has been sent many times to show what lunatics I deal with. I took a photo of that troll. Also parked in a hiding position was the usual large car of thug, white which was then to speed off and PRETEND that I was with MY daughter and WE MET WITH THAT THUG as it was the 18th and they want to “revise” the 18 Sept 2008 FRAUD. I met with no one; all the plans to “see me off” by using lowlife round Fell View LA2 9RP having failed again to manufacture “proof I commit fraud, theft etc” they resort to “meeting with”. I met with no one and who paid that thug to drive all this way to park and pretend and, what was in it for the troll? Yours Carol Woods Ms I have heard from no one at all incidentally and have no phone whatever the deranged try to invent for me. Under duress at 28 Fell View LA2 9RP. Please feel free to quote me. PS the daughter is one they threatened and intimidated for years as she was a great support for me. I have not seen her for 5 years now so the thugs leave her alone; MIKE TODD was murdered in all this leading to Sept 2008 and my daughter the lunatics dragged into it for a reason which will ALL be revealed. I will also add that via their ILLEGAL activity, they have spoiled the scanner I use in Lancaster university library; they want to stop me scanning here as they claim so many others are me who have no access to the uni and, they want to stop me scanning more of what Mike Todd had in front of him, what he was prosecuting on and why he was murdered. SOME of what he had in front of him was a bogus bankruptcy, perjury, EXTORTION, DEMAND MONEY WITH MENACES, WITNESS INTIMIDATION, ATTEMPTED MURDER PREMEDITATED, POLICE CORRUPTION AND CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER CHILD ABUSE ETC ETC. You can’t all be corrupt or cowardly; someone needs to assist me. Why would I want to meet with a thug and agree to pay money not owed? I returned to the library after the troll had walked off and the thug had driven off. We will see if they want to repeat the exercise when I leave again. ==============================================
SECTION OF A MESSAGE TO A [so called] TOP BARRISTER, 18 Dec. 2017: [there was no reply – so far. Interesting. This was the same barrister who told me this police force couldn’t be prosecuted. I replied that I thought “noone was above the law”? How foolish we general public are to think all men are equal under the law when its not like that at all].
“Regarding the errors which show themselves connected to this Act [regarding this device installed in Ms. Wood’s car], obvious discrepancies arise, do they not, when I quote the Act’s wording, and what is actually occurring in real time, for it is clearly stated within the Act that, regarding GPS devices and motor vehicles:
“it is vital that organisations maintaina vehicle tracking policy that is fully transparent and compliant with the Data Protection Act.Under this Act, persons who have tracking devices installed in the vehicles they own have the right to know what information is being held about them and the purpose for which it will be used. For this reason, collecting datacovertly is considered to be in breach of the law”.
To summerise: if the actions of Lancs. police are “covert policing actions” as they have clearly stated in writing in a letter, then that action clearly contravenes the D.P. Act as the actions are not “fully transparent”, and have to be. By not telling any information, it is surely deemed “secretive”, or covert”, is it not?
The D.P. Act goes on to state: “Furthermore, personal data can only be processed if at least one of the following applies: 1•The person concerned must have consented to the process 2•There is a contractual or legal obligation to process the data 3•It is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the subject”.
Taking the statement to pieces, we note that
a] the words by the 1st dot: “The person concerned must have consented to the process” [of having the device in her car] – Ms. Woods did not consent to the process of her motor vehicle being tracked, which rules out the very 1st line shown above being followed properly, according to the Act,
b] re: the 2nd line above, by the 2nd dot: “There is a contractual or legal obligation to process the data”– Ms. Woods has not been given any data pertaining to this device, “processed” or “unprocessed” and therefore the “legal obligation” by Lancs. police is broken, especially because the wording in the Act states: “Under this Act, persons who have tracking devices installed in the vehicles they own have the right to know whatinformation is being held about them and the purpose for which it will be used”. Please note that Ms. Woods has been told nothing about anything re: the device, and the device has been in her car much longer than when she made the SAR [FOIA] request and paid the fee at the force’s Hutton HQ in Ja. 2017. Another clear irregularity where laws are broken.
Lancs. police have stated in writing that this device falls under “covert policing actions” and as such do not tell anything regarding this device – what it’s for, why it is there, or what information is gleaned by the device and what that info is used for – all these actions fall foul of the spirit of the Act and the Act itself – which surely makes the device totally not legal.
Nothing to do with the device is “fully transparent” from Ms. Woods perspective, which it should be.
Finally, the statement in the 3rd line and by the 3rd dot, referring presumably to 1] Ms. Woods being “the subject” = and the words: “It is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the subject”: Ms. Woods is not protected in any way by having this device in her car, and BE IT KNOWN THAT THE DIRECT OPPOSITE IT TRUE AS THERE HAVE BEEN DIFFERENT ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS UPON MS. WOODS BY STALKERS WHILST SHE HAS BEEN DRIVING HER CAR – THE EXACT OPPOSITE of a “protective” device, as clearly stated within the Act.
Surely it is clear that Lancs. police’s “policy” fails entirely to be not only “a policy that isfully transparent and compliant with the Data Protection Act”, but that the Act has failed to be followed in so many areas.
PLUS this device ALSO breaches the E.C.H.R., Article 8 as already explained, that being the device breaches Ms. Woods privacy every time she enters her car.” [ends]
The Carol Woods Coverup: UPDATE: THE TRACKING DEVICE: LANCS. POLICE WRITE 17 Nov. 17– 18 Dec. 17 + more
Despite at least 3 employees at the Home Office, and other government employees recommending in printed letters, including one from Mike Penning MP that I take any grievance regarding Lancs. police’s behaviour connected to Carol Woods to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal [IPT] I can now say that this outfit is doing nothing at all regarding my sending them 15 pages of notes and a wad of their forms regarding the illegal tracking device that was installed in Carol Wood’s car by Lancs. police. Likewise the IPCC has also refused to act on complaints concerning Lancs. police’s actions, and have stated in writing that anything sent will be referred to Lancs. police for conclusion! Not only that, a top barrister, whose name I won’t mention here, has also advised that the CPS will not prosecute a police force, no matter what. There we have it. Also, the official F.O.I. Act [S.A.R.] fee was paid [and the receipt obtained] to Lancs. police at their Hutton, Preston HQ in January 2017 by Carol Woods for the proper and obligatory information relating to the GPS device in her car, THAT INFORMATION STILL BEING WITHELD BY LANCS. POLICE – another offence. See how the device entered Carol’s car here, below, entitled: “Carol Woods statement of HOW THE TRACKING DEVICE CAME TO BE IN MS. CAROL WOODS MOTOR VEHICLE”.
Concerning the “Data Protection Act 1998”, it is clearly stated within it that:
“it is vital that organisations maintain a vehicle tracking policy that is fully transparent and compliant with the Data Protection Act. Under this Act, persons who have tracking devices installed in the vehicles they own have the right to know what information is being held about them and the purpose for which it will be used. For this reason, collecting data covertly is considered to be in breach of the law.” To summerise: if the actions of Lancs. police are “covert policing actions” as they have clearly stated in writing in a letter, then that action clearly contravenes the D.P. Act as the actions are not “fully transparent”, and have to be.
The D.P. Act goes on to state: “Furthermore, personal data can only be processed if at least one of the following applies: •The person concerned must have consented to the process •There is a contractual or legal obligation to process the data •It is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the subject”.
PLEASE NOTE: a] Ms. Woods did not consent to the process of her motor vehicle being tracked, which rules out the very 1st line shown above, and re: the 2nd line above – Ms. Woods has not been given any data pertaining to this device, and therefore the “legal obligation” by Lancs. police is broken,
re: the 3rd line, Ms. Woods is not protected in any way by having this device in her car, and therefore this device is not justified in any way. ALSO, BE IT KNOWN THAT THERE HAVE BEEN ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS UPON MS. WOODS BY STALKERS WHILST SHE HAS BEEN DRIVING HER CAR – THE EXACT OPPOSITE of a “protective” device which is defined in line 3 above, according to the Act. All in all, this device breaches not on the Data Protection Act itself in many areas, but ALSO THE E.C.H.R., as already explained, that being the device breaches Ms. Woods privacy!
A] Ms. Woods has the right to know what information is being held about her and the purpose for which it will be used, but she has never been told anything regarding her motor vehicle being tracked.
Directly below, is the pointless and meaningless response received from Lancs. police, dated 17 November 2017. I say meaningless because this response doesn’t actually address anything – but it does actually state the no investigation AT ALL has been undertaken regarding the complaint made about the GPS tracking device in Carol’s car, only a response at “local resolution” level – a pointless exercise meaning, more than likely, that an extremely informal chat took place between certain “officers” over a cup of tea during a “tea break” in the police station canteen to resolve the extremely serious and longstanding complaint regarding the horrific and blatant targeting of a vulnerable, single, lawabiding old age pensioner who gave her entire life in service to others – particularly vulnerable and lone CHILDREN. Trying to get the right and proper conclusion to the abject and preplanned flouting of the law by these characters has taken so far 9 months, since March 2017, when my original communication [below] was sent to the then Chief Constable Finnegan, who then left his post and moved on! The latest interaction is hardly worth reporting, despite the misleading title of the team that has been sadly been corresponding for a minimum amount of time compared to the original date of beginning this complaint – MARCH 2017 – 9 MONTHS AGO. All that’s happened is that nothing to do with any investigation or conclusion to anything has taken place, or even been remotely near, yet pointless paperwork like the below was sent, to presumably, keep me quiet, in,line, shut up and satisfied. I don’t think so. Despite this contemptuous timewasting and subsequent squandering of our tax money [which funds the pointless nonsense of illegal tracking devices in totally lawabiding citizen’s cars also] LANCS. POLICE ARE STILL GUILTY OF BREACHING NOT ONLY ARTICLE 8 OF THE E.C.H.R. BUT ALSO THE DATA PROTECTION ACT by not saying anything about it to the innocent recipient of the GPS device which it is their duty to do, and are guilty of probably A WHOLE LOT MORE regarding everything that we aren’t even aware of, such as “unjustifable police actions” and the “rampant squandering of public funds” etc. etc..
Note in the very 1st line of the letter below it states that a “local resolution” has been enacted by Lancs. police instead of the more proper and surely more appropriate “formal investigation” that should have taken place – a dead giveaway that little actual honesty at all is taking place here as opposed to the correct method of dealing with an illegal act and breach of the European Convention on Human Right’s Article 8, which states:
1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.
2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.”
See more regarding the “Data Protection Act” below in my original message to Lancs. police Chief Constable Finnegan, letter dated 31 March 2017, also contemptuously ignored on each sending [I’ve lost count how many letters of complaint have been sent to Lancs. police by myself alone regarding this tracking device, installed in the car of a person who has, probably, never broken a law in her life, and what’s more has more formal qualifications than the entire congregation of “police officers” that make up the entire Lancs, police HQ at Hutton, Preston, including the chief and deputy chief constables – and all the rest!]. Please use copious amounts of “discernment” regarding the latest extremely disappointing use of resources, and citizen’s taxes:
What kind of police force is this that can persecute a lawabiding pensioner so badly for so long [since 2006]? For Lancs. police are responsible for a great deal of extremely questionable behaviour – for which there is OVERWHELMING and UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE.
The subject of pursuing justice regarding the despicable actions of LANCS. POLICE will be continue until JUSTICE IS DONE!!
video: ILLEGAL GPS TRACKING DEVICE INSTALLED IN CAROL WOODS’s CAR – 18 Sept. 17
— Received from Ms. Carol Woods on 17 OCTOBER 2017:
“Carol Woods statement of HOW THE TRACKING DEVICE CAME TO BE IN MS. CAROL WOODS MOTOR VEHICLE”
16 / 10 / 2017
“hi, just got the mail – completely crazy at my return [Ms. Woods had been away on holiday…JG.] – preface my car was not at an airport car park – apparently I am the owner of a silver grey Yaris much newer than mine – I seem to be an Asian female with long, dark hair. Preface Fell View is now 298 Oxcliffe Rd thus I have just bought my car AND AM NOT THE VICTIM FROM 2012.
I looked on Northern Car Sales site, Shaw Rd. Oldham January 2012 when staying with my sister – I only went onto the yard to get rid of a thug following me – he just used his phone presumably to say I looked at cars. I decided a car for sale was affordable and having a car would solve massive problems. I went back the next day and felt sure they expected me. Another car had appeared – the red Yaris and I was diverted to that. I had a test drive, liked it, agreed to buy it – cash. But the car price was £40 short of [my sister owed me money so I knew I’d get it] – the garage was responsible for completing the tear off strip for DVLA doc. change of owner / address of registered person. All that done, I had to go and get insurance before removing the car – I knew I’d have been arrested for driving without insurance if I drove it just to my sister’s. The insurance matter was awful – I’ve had other cars and never experienced the antics but – all done the garage told me not to collect the car until 5pm on 21/1/12 – why? Surely they just wanted it off the yard as sold? I went at 3pm to see what they were up to. My ignition was in bits – I was told they had snapped my key in the lock so needed to replace the system to accomodate a new key. I told them I was not daft – I thought of my white Polo – I told them what I thought they were doing – I was right, they had been 2] contacted and told if they wanted to stay in business, they’ed do as told. Gestapo? Yes. Then he said “You’re dealing with lunatics” – I said, “I know”. I went to sit in the office – the DVLA slip I could see – the man in the office assured me he would send it on – I was using my sister;s address to register the car. He told me not to bother about the £40 which I’d said I’d drop in with on 22 Jan. Getting the car about 5, I asked why there was no new key – he’d broken the original, old key, hadn’t he? I also asked why they had not used the spare key and just had a 2nd as spare cut – they knew I knew exactly what had gone on. Oddly, the man said “They can’t keep on arresting you” – “of course they can – who’ll stop them?” I said – a bit more chat – I said I’d be in the next morning with £40, was told not to bother but I wasn’t falling for that. It was a trap. Parking at my sister’s then showing her the car – I saw 900 miles had been added to the clock from my agreeing to buy it. [I faxed the Home Saecretary and K Clarke at least 3 times each to get that on record – where the hell had I apparently been to use 900 miles?]. The next morning I went with the £40 – they were not open – or pretended – the £40 trap was set. I took a note of the 2 x £20 notes, scribbled a note, put in an envelope and took photos of it going imnto the letterbox. I owed them nothing. On the 23rd Jan. I drove to Lancaster and transferred my insurance to my company – one I’d used for over 20 years – they were really good and getting all the refund due to me, showed illegal accessing of the company systems. PTO The Gestapo pulled me up after I left my insurance company [each event has it’s own story] – just to harass – to be seen to be a liar – then I returned to my sister’s. I left her house and stayed in a guest house for 4 days – called into the garage and they had NOT sent the DVLA doc. on. I asked for it and dealt with it myself. They had no intention of sending it in. For days then weeks then months [I started to rent at 298 on 4/3/12 after driving to Lewes to deal with outstanding matters from 2011 and living in my car most of Feb.] attempts were made to stealing my car key so I would then have to force my locks to get in and have new locks – their problem was they could not claim I had stolen the car, that I drove without insurance, and that I knew of the GPS – and how I could prove they had not broken the key at all to have a new ignition system fitted. With amazing luck, my car key was stolen but I had the spare key in my bag so didn’t need to force the locks – had another spare cut and so it went on. Followed into the ladies in students union offices which are not open to all and sundry – at the Uni – washing my hands – my keys placed by the sink disappeared – reported – ignored. I knew it had to be 1 of 2 trolls – again, I’d had my spare in my bag and always keep a spare. 2 garages have looked [April ’16 and May ’16] to see if they can remove it but said “too sophisticated” and will disable the car if they try to remove it.” [ENDS]
N.B.: Everything to do with this illegal GPS tracking device, including everything above was sent as a complaint to Lancs. police, and their “Investigations Team”s response was – nothing, and thus everything was then forwarded to the Investigations Powers Tribunal [IPT] after filling in all their forms, and sending 15 pages or so of documents pertaining to the device and related items, including Lancs. police’s so-called “responses” – the IPT’s response has also been – nothing. The woman I spoke to weeks ago at the IPT when chasing up my sending of the IPT forms and related docs. notifying the IPT about this GPS device even told me the IPT tribunal would probably dismiss my contacting them regarding this matter of this illegal GPS device, or deem everything inadmissable – and this was the receptionist on the phone one gets when initially calling in to the! To date, 12 Dec. 17, I am still waiting to hear from the IPT regarding anything to do with the 15 pages of notes and forms sent to them – completely unaccptable!
“COVERT POLICING TACTICS”?
Regarding the illegal “tracking device” installed in Carol Wood’s motor vehicle, and despite CW’s asking for obligatory information from Lancs. police regarding this device after her paying the proper “Freedom of Information” request fee at Lancs. police Hutton HQ in January 2017 was totally ignored, Lancs. police wanted a letter of permission, finally, from CW so I could interact with Lancs. police on her behalf so my complaint regarding this “tracking device” being installed in Carol Woods motor vehicle [and other matters] could be taken seriously.
One original contact with Lancs. police was in March 2017 [below] to the chief constable Finnegan, who promptly moved on from his postition – my communication completely ignored, as was every other communication sent until I contacted 3 chief constables a couple of months later regarding not being able to report serious crime to the police, which was also ignored by all sent to, so then I had no choice but to begin complaining about that. The “Investigations Support Team” of Lancs. police answered finally, [below] requiring a “letter of permission” from Carol Woods so as I could interact on her behalf regarding matters, also below. Now, after that “letter of permission” was finally received in writing from CW, and sent to Lancs. police, still nothing is done by Lancs. police Professional Standards and “Investigations Team” about this “tracking device”!
Typical recent communication from the Lancs. police “Professional Standards” dept. regarding my complaint to them regarding the device in Carol’s car, which breaches not only the E.C.H.R. but also the Data Protection Act:
THE “LETTER OF PERMISSION”:
The “letter of permission” from Carol Woods, dated 24 August 17, asked for by and sent 25 Aug. 17 to Lancs. police by recorded delivery 1st class Royal Mail, partly acknowledged now by Lancs. police:
Below, the original [ignored] communication from 31 March 2017 to the then Lancs. police chief constable Finnegan regarding the illegal GPS tracking device in Carol’s car. All other communications regarding this subject and reporting serious crime are ignored by all police contacted – including my local police, and 3 chief constables, until finally 2 local officers visited myself unexpectedly [after I had written so many times to the Dorset CC trying to make contact with police] on Saturday 9 June 17 at 9pm claiming – after my explaining as best I could the utter chaos Carol is forced to suffer courtesy of the authorities in Lancs., – that they would report matters concerning Carol Woods to Lancs. police, and Carol would be contacted by Lancs. police forthwith. Of course no such contact has been made by Lancs. police to Carol as promised – the daily persecution continues unabated, though.
“From: Mr. J. Graham, [redacted]
To: Mr. S. Finnegan, Chief Constable of Lancashire Police, Lancashire Constabulary Headquarters, Saunders Lane, Hutton nr Preston, PR4 5SB.
31 March 2017
Dear Mr. Finnegan,
I am writing to you concening the tracking device installed in the motor vehicle used by Ms. CAROL WOODS.
Ms Carol Woods address is: 28 Fell View, Caton, Lancashire, LA2 9RP.
I’m sure you are aware that regarding Ms. Woods motor vehicle, not only does such a device installed in her vehicle contavene 1] the Data Protection Act 1998, but also contravenes Ms. Woods rights according to 2] the European Commission of Human Rights [E.C.H.R.] – please see below:
1] The Data Protection Act 1998:
“The UK vehicle tracker laws fall under the category of processing personal data and accordingly, it is governed by the Data Protection Act 1988. In order to ensure vehicle tracking legality, it is vital that organisations maintain a vehicle tracking policy that is fully transparent and compliant with the Data Protection Act. Under this Act, persons who have tracking devices installed in the vehicles they own have the right to know what information is being held about them and the purpose for which it will be used. For this reason, collecting data covertly is considered to be in breach of the law. Furthermore, personal data can only be processed if at least one of the following applies: •The person concerned must have consented to the process •There is a contractual or legal obligation to process the data •It is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the subject”.
PLEASE NOTE: a] Ms. Woods did not consent to the process of her motor vehicle being tracked, and
b] Ms. Woods has the right to know what information is being held about her and the purpose for which it will be used, but she has never been told anything regarding her motor vehicle being tracked.
2] The European Court of Human Rights “Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides a right to respect for one’s “private and family life, his home and his correspondence”
1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.
2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.”
PLEASE NOTE: referring to the European Court of Human Rights, Article 8: Ms. Woods right to privacy has clearly been breached by the interference of this tracking device installed in her motor vehicle.
Mr. Finnegan, it is clear that such a tracking device installed in Ms. Woods motor vehicle is in clear breach of these 2 statutes cited above, and in the respect of trying to obtain information regarding this tracking device, Ms. Woods states: “I have asked specifically for the data in relation to PERMISSION for GPS sought and then gained, and paid £10
but received nothing. I TOOK my £10 in Jan 2017 after asking if I needed to pay £10 via
firstname.lastname@example.org Jan this year, it was acknowledged as received as I drove all the way to HUTTON HQ, to deliver it (I asked them to formally acknowledge receipt) as well as getting a receipt there at the front desk”. Therefore Ms. Woods has applied for the information regarding the tracking device in her vehicle, but not received any information in return – an extremely serious irregularity. Can you please remove this device from Ms. Woods motor vehicle that is clearly falling foul of the statutes in place – those being the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Article 8 of the European Commission of Human Rights?
Mr. Finnegan, failure to acknowledge this communication will result in my contacting the highest authorities regarding these breaches of the said statutes stated above.
J. Graham concerned citizen” [ENDS]
After much stalling by the Lancs. police to even admit there was a tracking device in Ms. Woods car this letter below was finally received on the 27 September 17 from Lancs, police “Investigations Team” with the admission that a tracking device was being used in Carol’s car and was being used under “covert policing tactics“, which is quite a remarkable example of bs considering known jihadi terrorists in the UK surely are not stalked as severely, nor are organised criminal gang members. Carol is neither of those, and it is painfully obvious that the only reason the device is being used at all is to blatantly harass and gangstalk Carol every time she goes out and drives her car. Indeed, attempts to murder Carol have taken place when she has been driving her car, when the unemployed stalking yobs who harass Carol all the time anyway have tried a few times to manufacture road traffic accidents where Carol would be the injured – or deceased – party. I myself witnessed – as a passenger in Carol’s car when I visited earlier this year – these stalking yobs driving their car perilously close to Carol’s completely unneccessarily, and performing outrageous manoevres with the passengers in the offending car looking back, once passed, laughing hysterically at their perverse actions. Again, Lancs. police have much to answer for by paying these thugs to perform such cr-p, deliberately endangering lives in the process.
“COVERT POLICING TACTICS” ARE CITED IN THE LETTER BELOW FROM LANCS. POLICE AS THE REASON this GPS device has been installed in Carol’s car – BUT WHY? Carol is no “JIHADI TERRORIST”, nor a member of any ORGANISED CRIME CARTEL, or anything to do with anything CRIMINAL, yet Lancs. police have installed this GPS tracking device in her car and WON’T TELL HER WHY!! WHYEVER NOT?? Not only does this GPS device breach Carol’s HUMAN RIGHTS [Article 8 of the E.C.H.R.] but by not telling Carol why the device is there in the first place also breaches Carol’s rights under the DATA PROTECTION ACT. She has paid the correct fee at the Lancs. police Hutton HQ in January 2017 via a FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST [S.A.R.] that is the normal procedure to get the information but still Lancs. police refuse to forward any to her – ANOTHER CRIME!!
Also, before contacting the IPT, a complaint was made to the IPCC regarding not being able to report serious crimes, which included the
a] installation of the “tracking device” in CW’s vehicle,
b] Dorset Police hanging up in me when being contacted by them regarding reporting serious crimes pertaining to Carol Woods to any police,
c] Lancs. police ignoring communications to them over the months, and not responding after the 2 Dorset officers who visited myself on 9 June 17 claiming they would be contacting Lancs. police who would then be contacting Carol Woods [no such contact was made, naturally]. Below is my complaint to the IPCC and their response – which was to pass everything back to Lancs. police, who were stonewalling in the first place and responsible for the numerous irregularities anyway!!!, [and still are]:
26 June 2017 at 22:45
Dear Ms. Coulton,
Here, below, is my latest communication to yourself in reply to your message to me, dated 22 June 17.
I DO wish to report as stated to the I.P.C.C. the matters described.
Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). We acknowledge receipt of your email dated 13 June 2017, the contents of which have been filed under the above reference number.
I note from your email that you are unhappy with the police, however it is not clear if you are wishing to submit a formal complaint against the police.
If you wish to make a new complaint or allegation of misconduct against a serving member of the police then the IPCC can forward it on your behalf to the relevant police force. If you do wish to make such a complaint or allegation we will need to be provided with the following information;
WHO? Which police force is your complaint about?
WHERE? Where did the incident/s happen that led to your complaint?
WHEN? When did the incident/s happen that led to your complaint?
WHAT? Please describe the circumstances that have led to you feeling the police have treated you badly.
If however you do not wish to make a new complaint or allegation of misconduct, or submit an appeal against a concluded investigation into a previous complaint I do not believe the IPCC can assist you any further at this time.
Please note that all complaints made to the IPCC by law must be forwarded to the ‘appropriate authority’ for consideration – usually this is the Professional Standards Department (PSD) of the police force concerned. When you submit your complaint in full your details will be passed onto the PSD for consideration.
I do wish to raise a complaint against Lancs police
– specifically Mr. S. Finnegan Chief Constable as he refuses to answer numerous messages to him,
specifically the one shown below dated 31 March 17, and against also their Professional Standards, who are mentioned in the attached response [letter] from Lancs police – they still have not contacted me as promised.
The above communication was replied to in full by the IPCC – the end result simply stating that everything was passed back to Lancs. police by the IPCC – hence the Lancs Police “Investigations Team” finally responding via their “covert police tactics” letter on the 27 September 2017. The next stage was complaining to the IPT, which was done, but has got nowhere as I write on 12 Dec. 17. – the entire process beginning in March 2017 with the letter to the ex-CC Finnegan.
Meanwhile, the Home Office wrote to send everything regarding this “tracking device” to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal [as already detailed above] – the letter dated 31 August 17, something that Carol did already some time ago – her comment:
Date: 5 September 2017 at 15:46
Subject: Re: Fwd: Win cw
Hi thanks for this; firstly, I have 3 huge files from the Gestapo from 2002 when they claimed to the IPT that they had never heard of me and that I had never lived in Lancaster. That led to all sorts which included the IPT ceasing the FULL INQUIRY into my case after NATIONAL news bulletin April 2006, “The government has ordered an inquiry into how Lancashire conducts its affairs”. The Gestapo spoiled all that: the IPT just returned my file to me with no comments. It was March 2008 JUST THE WEEK MIKE TODD WAS MURDERED when the IPT told me in a letter that they thought Carol Woods was an alias and that I was really someone else somewhere else, my sister in fact.” [ENDS]
The above are just part of numerous communications to and from UK government departments regarding the appalling and illegal targeting of Carol Woods by certain UK government personnel paid by the taxpayer to act in a responsible and honest manner, which include, especially, the police – local to Ms. Woods and the main force, and the county council, and all connected, including Royal Mail, who refuse to do anything regarding Carol’s mail being deliberately diverted and misdelivered, or delivered to her months later – or not delivered at all.
to be continued, when any progress is made with these dubious government departments!
On Tuesday, 19 December 2017, 20:52, carol woods wrote:
“Just to let you know I returned to my car after an early cinema show (8 15pm) and found my car window smashed among all the cars parked on the street and only mine any damage. Some people passing loaned me their phone so I rang he Gestapo and a cop came, motor bike and took the details of a car parked illegally at a bus stop near by; he did not bother about my car. Dec 2005 and Daisy Mae Morrison’s car was vandalised outside my house, we had gone into Lancaster. That was WITNESS INTIMIDATION and in Jan 2006 when she called again and her car was written off, I had my court case then stayed to protect my witnesses. In Dec 2008 they stole my car K71 CEC and installed a GPS, I found out and they stole my car taking it to the police garage MACADAMS where they systematically wrecked it to hide the GPS installed then illegally. The Gestapo have stalked all day trying to pretend they see me driven by another. I can drive my car back to Hell View and cover up the windows. They started on my car over a week ago. Carol (so someone knows) the street is terraced houses and someone must have heard it all.
To Lancs but CC to others who will get the gist, I require the name rank and badge number of the Gestapo driving AGAIN this time to confirm he saw me and a RED MINI and not the yellow one of the earlier farce. The yellow MINI details I sent via email; the red was HD59 NUK and does not rewrite the Aug 2015 and helicopter farce using the RED MINI then to pretend A Jackson of 26 Fell View was me. I also note that YOU arranged for my car windows to be smashed to be Daisy Mae’s car at my house Dec 2005 and then Jan 2006 in WITNESS INTIMIDATION with the thugs then following me to a corner shop to threaten and intimidate me. The dreary old loser stalking me after the library about 5 45pm reminded me of those thugs that night Jan 2006.FOR THOSE CC THIS I HAD MY THEN COURT APPEAL STAYED TO PROTECT MY WITNESSES. DAISY MAE IS BLACK SO IT WAS AGGRAVATED BY RACISM AND HER CAR WAS WRITTEN OFF IN JAN 06 AS MINE WAS IN THE REPEAT OF JAN 2009 AFTER MY HOUSE HAD BEEN WRECKED OF COURSE WITH THE WINDOWS THERE RIPPED OUT IN THAT WRECKING OF MY HOUSE IN OCT 08 PRIOR TO MY CAR. MY car K71 CEC was stolen with an illegal GPS device fitted in Dec 2008 and then stolen in Jan 2009 and written off BY YOUR GARAGE MACADAMS of Carnforth to hide the illegal GPS then. I note that the Gestapo biker called after some people were kind enough to help me at my car and reported the TARGETED VANDALISM via their phone. The Gestapo was not calling about my reported car but to note a car illegally parked on a bus stop. EJ61 NPF and if you think that makes me forget the GMP thugs at my brother’s house parked then at a bus stop in Nov 2004 to threaten and intimidate you can think again, bullying thugs. This to GMP thugs and so they know my photos of that night are excellent and WILL BE SEEN. You are a disgrace. Carol Woods Ms PS the officer taking my car report was decent. I WAIT TO TESTIFY. [ends]
HOW COME THE POLICE OFFICER DESCRIBED ABOVE DIDN’T EVEN RECORD THIS CRIME OF VANDALISM TO A CAR? WHAT’S GOING ON WITH LANCS. POLICE?
Some Background to the targeting of Carol Woods:
Carol Woods = “It is a highly complex matter which the police organise where they try to make me someone I am not. They have in fact tried to invent me as the reverse of myself using numerous characters, including “neighbours” who live alongside myself, and others elsewhere – the entire situations going back years. I find things out because I am not stupid. See my original w’blowing blog York LGO Blog re Lancashire CC http://criticalreader2006.blogspot.ae/ you will see why I am hounded by lowlife RECRUITED to do that by the Gestapo.
Apart from numerous and longstanding ID frauds [where goods and other services have been obtained by dubious “neighbours” in her locale using Carol Wood’s ID, much obtained via her stolen mail – something Royal Mail has been notified about an infinite amount of times, with no proper response at all] and along with many other serious crimes enacted in her name [see the list below in the section entitled “Some Background, below] Carol Woods is stalked daily by her neighbours who are, it is very strongly alleged, employed by the local police and other factions of Lancs. county council. Ms. Woods is particularly targeted at the library which she has to use for the use of the computers therein, as having computers and phones etc. at her home has proven futile because of them being hacked by the same individuals who hack the library computers whenever she uses them. These unemployed, mostly male yobs, in the pay of the police etc. to surveille Ms. Woods [it is very strongly alleged], openly sit alongside her in the library, mobile phones in their hands while they hack the computer Ms. Woods is using, scanning and interfering with whichever emails to and from Ms. Woods they see fit, amongst other electronic interference.
What is particularly appalling also is that – apart from the Royal Mail letters being deliberately misdelivered to criminal neighbours etc. – so many serious crimes committed against Ms. Woods have been refused being reported for years now, to the police and other government agencies, including the IPCC who do nothing when told about complaints involving Lancs. police. Apart from Ms. Woods continually contacting police departments and politicians and other government agencies, other supporters have contacted UK Government departments regarding the serious crimes Ms. Woods is victim of, I personally have approached 3 different chief constables of 3 different police forces to no avail, and the IPCC have been complained to regarding this lack of duty by police employees – the IPCC merely passing my concerns back to the force allegedly behind the bulk of so many of the very strongly alleged crimes – Lancs. police. Contacting these UK Government departments has proven a complete waste of time, such is the coverup involved to do with so much of what is very strongly alleged concerning Ms. Carol Woods.
The posts and updates from Ms. Woods on this site alone detail this harassment from Ms. Woods neighbours along with detailing many of the numerous crimes committed since Febuary 2016 when Ms. Woods was forcibly detained for no reason other than to silence her in a mental unit, for the 5th time. As there were no proper grounds for Ms. Woods to be held in the mental unit, she was released after protests were made. This enforced kidnapping of Ms. Woods was the 5th time such a kidnapping had occurred to Ms. Woods because of the input by certain authorities who completely shirk their responsibilities and cover up serious crime – eg. employing and paying from the public purse criminals who flout the law by stalking Ms. Woods almost daily, and every time Ms. Woods leaves her abode, and also enabling them to partake in numerous ID frauds completely outside of the law, and much more – the reporting of numerous DWP benefit frauds and connected to the DWP fraud department, and to the banks – Barclays and Santander – who had numerous accounts in false names to launder the DWP monies gained illegally, proving a complete waste of time also.
Some more background:
In the latest posts and in the archive linked, Carol goes into greater detail regarding what she is having to experience from those around her, all with, it seems, the full cooperation and assistance of the local authorities who command the numerous crimes and the actions of the numerous lowlife stalkers she is surrounded by. Not only do these nightmare neighbours she is surrounded by steal her landline telephone and internet delivery lines running into her house, and misuse it on an almost daily basis by the lines being previously diverted to their more than likely ramshackle homes, they also steal her electricity too when they can [when Carol switches it on], and much more. Carol can hear her neighbours testing their electricity sockets after she has turned her power on from the main switch in her home. For this very reason her electricity supply is having to be almost permanently switched off for fear of it being hacked by these criminal neighbours, she lives by candlelight and she has had to live electricity free in her home for years because of these lowlives’ thieving alongside her home – many of them doting and ageing pensioners who steal her services because they can and do not get criminally charged with anything – courtesy of the fake authoritarian figures in place who should be in prison rather than be sitting pretty in a government office somewhere, local or otherwise. Fake IDs used by so many – if not all – of Carol’s criminal neighbours pay for many things through fake bank accounts, the money all ultimately coming from the UK taxpayer – the general public, as are the new cars given as rewards to certain neighbours paid for the same way – the road tax etc for these cars also paid for by the UK public, as are the numerous “Blue Badge” schemes many of these cars are concessioned with – all registered via false details but paid for out of the public purse. Authorities do nothing when told about these scams – how much longer can these outright crimes continue?
Regarding the internet and phone lines running into her abode: Carol even witnessed the rewiring of such to cater for her neighbours criminal thieving when she came back home from being out one day – the lines being rearranged and diverted into her loft where the neighbour’s connections take place, and thus the ability for these thieves to steal her services. A bit of detail about this stealing of Carol’s services – when Carol came back from being out one day, she noticed an ironing board, of all things, leaning against a wall in one of her rooms which wasn’t there before she’d gone out. On moving the ironing board, there on the wall was – crudely written in biro or whatever – the electrician or whoever’s drawing for the rewiring of the phone + internet lines being diverted into her loft – for the use of the thieving neighbours as already described. This is why, when out on later outings to wherever, tell-tale ironing boards would be left deliberately en route – leaning against walls or whatever – for Carol not to miss. Such is the cruelty of the minds involved in this entire gangstalking scenario CW is having and has had to put up with for so many years. Does any authority do anything about any of this stealing of her phone or internet services when they’re notified? No they don’t – the same way as the CEO of Royal Mail ignores all notifications to him regarding misdeliveries of CW’s mail to assorted neighbours [see earlier posts on this]. Other authorities also contemptuously ignore other notifications of gross irregularities / crimes sent to them. Why? Go figure. Semantic battles with the R. Mail’s current CEO proved pointless when trying to report the numerous and longstanding deliberate misdeliveries of mail to the neighbours who give CW such a hard time. As for these loutish neighbours and their hostilities, it’s hard to argue, for example, when someone wearing a police officer’s uniform making out they’re a police officer is intimidating one and breathing down one’s neck giving one preposterous orders to harass and hurt a fellow citizen – but harass and hurt they do, putting aside any semblance of conscience or, dare I say it – guilt. Perhaps the gift of a new car – or two – paid for by the UK taxpayers – eases their conscience and helps these sad characters turn the other cheek and commit serious crime and also stalk so inhumanly someone who devoted her entire working life in service to others – as Carol has – trying to help children especially. These lowlives – and the lowlives controlling all the conspiracies against Carol Woods – have much to answer for, and let’s hope that day comes soon when they get their comeuppance – noone likes a corrupt traitor, especially those who are in the positions they’re in, whose sky-high wages are paid by the UK taxpayer, and its funny how things turn around and come back ten times worse for those perpetrating these obscenities. But that’s noone’s problem but theirs.
It is completely unjust and as outrageous and unfair that I am refused reporting – by 3 separate police forces – serious crimes, as correspondence, or rather ignored correspondences to these 3 police forces, would show [UPDATE 24 JUNE 17 – a few days ago – at 20.53BST on the evening of Saturday 17 June, to be exact, 2 Dorset officers knocked on my door without any forewarning [after my now numerous messages to the Chief Constable]and although unprepared, I duly gave them such info as I could regarding the huge number of crimes listed so far as detailed by and committed against CW. After 50 minutes, one of the officers promised me that “Lancs. police would be got in touch with, with a view for them to contact CW”. Of course I immediately protested that, allegedly, the Lancs. police were one of the very parties behind this series of numerous ongoing crimes, and to do such would be a waste of time. Note that this has been tried before when Lancs. police have been told of certain crimes pertaining to CW by CW, and nothing has been done at all. Nevertheless, this was all I could expect, apparently. Who knows if anything was passed on to Lancs. police, and even if it was, will anything be done about anything? It is now weeks since Dorset police were informed that night of 17 June, and Ms. Woods harassment continues unabated – so the evidence points to the fact that nothing has been done regarding what was reported to those 2 Dorset police officers]. If one complains to higher authorities about this completely unacceptable situation, I would guess that the targeting I am experiencing almost on a daily basis – whenever I go out – would escalate to an unacceptable level, causing me to fear for my very own life. That is why also the updates from CW have been drastically curtailed here. So be it. William Burroughs, the great author, once said that if a person didn’t want to catch malaria, one shouldn’t go to an area where malaria is rife. I seemed to have stumbled into something similar. So be that also…
The question has been asked: “why would the “Powers That Be” target someone such as Carol Woods for so long [since 2006], involving so many perpetrators, committing so many serious crimes, funded by the public and local council taxpayers?”.
Carol Woods is a 63 years old former Lancashire County Council Level 3 Social Worker and Child Protection Officer [who used to train social workers] and a former Probation Officer, amongst many other things. Perhaps the appalling and chronic targeting she has no choice but to put up with 24/7 is because she reported numerous seriously grave irregularities she discovered, including child abuse, when being employed by Lancashire county council, and when one realises that the very controllers of the targeting and stalking Carol is forced to endure are, very probably, very closely connected to the same departments and personnel who are described in the links above and the “IMPORTANT VIDEOS” shown below, which detail what was discovered when Carol worked as a Child Protection officer in Lancashire, then it should not be hard to understand these hostilities enacted against her. Put it this way: the Welsh scientist, weapons expert and authority on biological warfare, employed by the British Ministry of Defence David Kelly was supposed to have leaked serious information to the detriment of the PTB at the time – look what happened to him. Now, Carol is no weapons expert, but one doesn’t have to be one to upset the proverbial apple cart bigtime. And anyway, we are told there have been assassination attempts upon her life too – quite a few in fact, including ramming her car at speed, on a main road, by perpetrators unknown…well, almost unknown.
And why is there an illegal tracking device installed in Ms. Woods car – put there, apparently – by Lancs. police? The Chief Constable of Lancashire has been written to so many times about so many serious matters with no response it’s quite remarkable. Another 2 chief constables have been written to asking can serious crime be reported to their forces also with no response whatsoever, and I have tried on more than one occasion to notify my local police about serious crime at my local central police station to be totally ignored every visit, which is just another public scandal!
Many more serious crimes and misdemeanours committed against Ms. Woods are all completely ignored by whichever UK government agency one tries to take anything to, including:
many murder attempts upon Carol,
impersonation, ID frauds,
person[s] impersonating police officers in official government hearings, [or hearing[s] purporting to be official],
Royal Mail frauds,
monetary frauds involving: dubious bank accounts at numerous high street banks, the DWP, Social Security, town council[s] and other agencies,
illegal tracking of motor vehicle via GPS device [or similar],
a high number of motor vehicle “Blue Badge” [UK HM Government concession] frauds,
regular physical harassment / mental torture upon a person [aka “gangstalking”],
telephone / Internet Broadband / electricity supply fraud,
wrongful kidnapping[s] / incarceration[s] in UK HM Government units, police station[s], HM Prison[s] etc.,
home burglaries, car vandalism going uninvestigated by local police [see
– many other instances of serious crime and illegal activity exist, and many acts contravening not only the Data Protection Act 1998, but also the contravention of articles pertaining to the European Commission of Human Rights [particularly Article 8].
What is going on is maybe unbelievable, and at times complicated, but that is surely deliberate and part of this outrageous targeting of a law-abiding citizen – a lone female – who dared to report serious irregularities she found during her employment as a Level 3 social worker and Child Protection Officer. As a result, apart from the crimes committed against her as described, her house and contents with a value of £400,000+ was stolen from her, and her employment tribunal award of £50,000 found its way to someone who conspired against her who fraudulently took Carol Wood’s ID. Other serious crimes exist and continue to this very day…
1] PLAYLIST [3 videos]: EXPOSING FAKE SOCIAL WORKERS ETC. 06 Febuary 2016
Mum with cancer on Universal Credit forced to wait months to bury son after she was £900 short for funeral Desperate cancer patient Diane Hannaby, 52, was left in debt after waiting two months for enough funds for her son’s funeral Cancer … Continue reading →
The DWP is facing the wrath of thousands of people this week Steve Topple 26th November 2018 0 0 comments https://spkt.io/a/149301 SPONSORED BY CASUMO The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is facing the wrath of potentially thousands of people this week. … Continue reading →
May’s DWP claims at PMQs were debunked before she began AUDIO: LISTEN to this article: https://spkt.io/a/128181 At Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) on Wednesday 24 October, Theresa May made some bold claims about the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). Sadly … Continue reading →
Why will no one sort this massive corruption out? So many top UK government officials have been written to by many people but everything is ignored wholesale! Received: From: carol woods <email@example.com> To: many UK govt. officials inc. firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org … Continue reading →
STEVE TOPPLE The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is under more pressure over its flagship benefit policy. Because an organisation with over five million members has now officially called for Universal Credit to be stopped and scrapped. The DWP: five million … Continue reading →
The DWP just revealed the eye-watering millions it paid out to private companies JULY 26TH, 2018 STEVE TOPPLE TRENDING, UK https://spkt.io/a/98811On Thursday 26 July, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) revealed the amount it paid out in June to private contractors. It’s … Continue reading →
JULY 25TH, 2018 STEVE TOPPLE ANALYSIS, UK The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) released some damning information about benefit sanctions; conveniently just as parliament was closing for its summer holidays. The DWP: sanctions and mental health On Tuesday 24 July, minister of … Continue reading →
The DWP just admitted a court case it lost will affect thousands of people JULY 11TH, 2018 STEVE TOPPLE ANALYSIS, UK https://spkt.io/a/95341 The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) just admitted that a court case it lost means it may have to pay … Continue reading →
Why will noone dare sort this massive corruption out? The “Preface” directly below, followed by the most recent updates from 30 – 26 May 18 from Carol Woods. The posts detail the serious crime occurring to Carol, and connected to … Continue reading →
Received: the outrageous victimisation and persecution by S. Wales police and their cronies continues, which shows them to be totally unfit to be in the positions of “authority” they are – a complete and utter public scandal! There is no justice in the cases connected to Maurice Kirk – only malfeasance, and more malfeasance, and blatant corruption – it is truly disgusting.
Archive:Maurice is serving a highly questionable 2 year sentence, beginning on 14/12/2017 in HMP Parc, Bridgend, Wales – the archive of posts here with MK’s updates from HMP Parc:
Received: Maurice [still on hunger strike for many weeks] tells that the prison doctor, who has had many dealings with Maurice before in previous totally unjust sentences spoke with him and offered to contact his family, as communications to his family are greatly restricted for Maurice – hardly legal, but nevertheless happening right now, and as MK states in his note below “..but after writing Celia’s name and telephone number ‘in house’ South Wales police stopped the Rule 39 letter to her leaving the wing until 5.30pm deliberately as, by then, Dr. Marnell would have gone home” – such are the dirty deeds of these public servants who salaries are paid by the taxpayer. The message continues to say a “turnkey” confirmed to MK the following morning that the S Wales police would have read the letter “at the HMP Security Office“. He goes on to say “God help all those on remand awaiting trial as all their Rule 39 letters to their solicitors are also read by the police before being allowed to leave a Welsh prison”. What exactly is a “Rule 39” letter? It is this: “Rule 39 of the Prison Rules 1999 states that any correspondence between a prisoner and his or her legal adviser or a court may not be opened, read or stopped unless the Governor has reasonable cause to believe that the correspondence contains an illicit enclosure, or that the Governor has reasonable cause to believe that its contents endanger prison security or the safety of others or are otherwise of a criminal nature. Even then it may only be opened for examination in the presence of the prisoner concerned (unless the prisoner waives the opportunity) and the prisoner must be informed if it (or any enclosure) is to be read or stopped.” from “Rule 39 Correspondence – guidance”https://insidetime.org/rule-39-correspondence-guidance/
Make what you will of that outrageous malfeasance by our “governmental representatives”.
Archive: Maurice is serving a highly questionable 2 year sentence, beginning on 14/12/2017 in HMP Parc, Bridgend, Wales – the archive of posts here with MK’s updates from HMP Parc:
Mum with cancer on Universal Credit forced to wait months to bury son after she was £900 short for funeral Desperate cancer patient Diane Hannaby, 52, was left in debt after waiting two months for enough funds for her son’s funeral Cancer patient Diane Hannaby had to fight for funds to bury her son
(Photo: Diane Hannaby) Nilufer Atik Wednesday December 5th 2018 In brief Diane Hannaby had to leave her son in a morgue while waiting for funeral aid Her benefits were cut just a month before his death She is now £3,000 in debt and facing Christmas alone When Diane Hannaby was given the devastating news that her son, Ashley, had died suddenly at the age of 34, she was heartbroken. Having battled various forms of cancer for the last six years, she’d suffered her fair share of trauma. But worse news was to come. The 52-year-old disabled grandmother then discovered that, because of changes to her benefits that saw her moved to Universal Credit, she wouldn’t be able to afford his funeral. For two months Diane had to leave her son’s body in the morgue, sobbing daily because she was desperate to put him to rest but was short of £900 to afford a burial. “It was absolutely awful,” Diane told i. “I couldn’t bear the thought of him lying there all alone with none of his loved ones around him. It prolonged my grief as I couldn’t say goodbye to my son properly.”
Deteriorating health Diane’s ordeal began when she decided to move from her home in Northampton to Weymouth in Dorset in August this year for health reasons. The mother-of-two – who has another son, Connor, 23 – was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2012 and had to give up work as a cleaner supervisor and claim Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) and Personal Independence Payment (PIP) as she underwent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Only a year later, she was diagnosed with tongue cancer, and in 2014 suffered a major heart attack and was found to have coronary heart disease, a potentially fatal condition in which the arteries of the organ become narrowed. “I had to be signed off work permanently then as I just wasn’t well enough,” Diane said. “I’d worked all my life so it was hard giving up my independence.” More health problems followed when Diane was diagnosed with neck cancer in 2016 and had to have radiotherapy, then suffered a collapsed lung. “My doctor basically said that I will probably keep getting one form of cancer or another until one kills me,” explained Diane. “So I decided to move in with my sister in Weymouth, where I was originally from. I thought being near the sea might help prolong my life.” While it was hard moving away from her sons who also lived in Northampton, Diane’s sister helped care for her and she spoke to her sons regularly, going to visit them and her grandchildren Jaydan, 12, and Lewis, 14, whenever she felt well enough. “I missed them a lot and worried about Ashley because he was struggling with alcoholism and I couldn’t be there for him,” Diane recalled. “He had pancreatitis as a result of his drinking so his health wasn’t good either.” In August this year, Diane decided to live on her own again so her sons and grandchildren could come and stay for visits and was offered a council flat. “I had claimed housing benefit on top of my ESA and PIP before moving in with my sister but hadn’t claimed housing benefit while living with her because I didn’t need it,” Diane said. “But I needed it again now as I couldn’t pay the rent otherwise, which was £475 a month.” “The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) told Diane she would have to switch over from ESA to Universal Credit in order to get help with her housing costs. This meant that instead of receiving ESA and housing benefit separately, both her rent and living expenses would be covered by one payment of UC. Diane says she was told the transition would be “smooth and easy” and all she had to do was answer a few questions over the phone and her benefits would be swapped over. “I thought I’d get the same amount I was getting before when I lived on my own or even more as my rent was higher in Weymouth,” she said. “But I ended up with less.” Diane said she was left around £130 out of pocket each month and struggling to make ends meet. “I had to take out a loan for my first rent payment as my Universal Credit payment didn’t come through in time,” Diane said. “It was the first time I’d been in debt for years and I had enough on my plate worrying about my health.” More bad news was on its way, however. On 18 September this year, Diane called Ashley for a chat. “We were very close and he had gone through a rough patch too but was coming out the other side,” Diane recalled. “He was desperate to give up drinking and was waiting for a place on a rehab programme and was feeling positive about the future.”
Ashley had split from his partner but saw his two sons as often as he could. Ashley adored his sons Lewis and Jaydan (Photo: Diane Hannaby) “He adored his kids and was talking about starting work as a fork lift driver again once he’d been to rehab and getting his life back on track,” Diane said. “I remember him telling me he loved me and would see me soon before he hung up. It was the last thing he ever said to me.” The next day Diane got a phone call from her ex-partner, Ashley’s father. “He told me Ashley had been found dead at his flat,” she said. “I thought I’d misunderstood at first. ‘What are you talking about? I only spoke to him yesterday and he was fine,’ I argued. But it was true. My son was dead.” Ashley’s lifeless body had been found at his flat crouched on the floor with his head leaning against the sofa by his friend, Nikki. “I spoke to her and she told me she hadn’t seen him for a few days so had gone round to check on him. When she got there his front door had been left open and he was slumped on the floor. She called an ambulance but it was too late,” said Diane. Distraught, Diane went to Northampton to be with her family and find out what had happened. “But the police couldn’t tell me anything – only that there were no suspicious circumstances,” she said. “I was racking my brains as to what might have happened. Did he fall and hit his head? He’d been suffering from pancreatitis, had that killed him?” ‘I felt financially and emotionally broken’ Diane Hannaby Diane was told that the cause of death wouldn’t be given until Ashley’s inquest, due to take place in the next few weeks. So she had to focus on putting her son to rest and set about arranging his funeral. Devastating time With no money to pay for it and now struggling on Universal Credit, she had to apply for a Funeral Expenses Payment, which is meant to help those who can’t afford to pay for a funeral with burial or cremation fees, travel to and from the funeral, the cost of moving the body, death certificates and up to £700 for other expenses such as the coffin.
Dianne during happier times with her sons Ashley and Connor (Photo: Diane Hannaby) But Diane was told by the DWP that she would have to wait between six to eight weeks before she would be allocated any funds. And even then, she was only given £1,499 – leaving her with a £900 deficit to pay herself. “The cheapest place I could find that would arrange the funeral charged £2,399 – most places charged between £3,000 and £4,000,” Diane recalled. “I chose the most basic coffin and only wanted a few flowers – nothing fancy. “Because I’d only had one payment of Universal Credit by then, I was classed as being newly on benefits, even though I’d claimed ESA previously for years. It meant I had to wait until after my next payout to claim for the funeral costs – eight weeks in total for them to make a decision and unable to bury Ashley all that time. I was financially broke by then and emotionally broken too,” Dianne added. “I was staying at Ashley’s ex’s house in Northampton as I didn’t want to leave the grandchildren, who were devastated. I also didn’t want to be too far away from Ashley. It felt like I’d be abandoning him if I went home and left him in that morgue but waiting around and not being able to give my son a funeral only prolonged my grief.” Read more on funeral costs: Funeral price war intensifies as Co-op launches “price beating” pledge After finally being granted £1,499, Diane had to borrow money from friends and relatives to scrape together the remaining £900 she needed. “It wasn’t easy but I managed it and eventually, we had the funeral on 16 November,” she said. “It helped to finally say goodbye to Ashley but I felt so angry that I’d had to leave him for so long. At least now he can rest in peace.”
But the stress of the ordeal has taken a further toll on Diane’s health. She’s developed several ear infections and fears she could suffer another heart attack. “I am in about £3,000 debt in total,” Diane explained. “I had to borrow £950 for a deposit on my council flat, which I have to pay back to the council, then my first month’s rent, then another £900 for the funeral costs and apparently I need to pay back some of my ESA too. I have no idea how I’m ever going to pay it off. “I don’t find it easy to get around because of my heart condition so have to pay for help with the cleaning and chores. I can’t walk very far either so have to use taxis to get to hospital appointments and, as you can imagine, I have a lot of them.”
Diane faces Christmas alone (Photo: Diane Hannaby) Diane hasn’t seen her grandchildren since the funeral because she isn’t well enough to travel and can’t afford it. “I have just about enough for food and heating but nothing left over for Christmas presents. I am even going to be spending Christmas alone at home this year because I can’t afford to see my family.” Her friend Sharon Black, who has set up a justgiving appeal to raise funds to help Diane pay off some of her debts, told i: “It’s appalling that a woman who has suffered so much should have this kind of thing hanging over her. She’s lost her son and has chronic illnesses. She didn’t choose to be on benefits. It’s not right.” A spokesman for Northamptonshire police said: “At this stage we are aware of the death of Mr Jakeman and the case is currently in the hands of HM Coroner. An officer will be able to provide the deceased’s mother with a progress report in the coming days.” A DWP spokesperson said: “Universal Credit targets support to those that need it most – when it’s fully rolled out many disabled people will get £100 a month more on average than they did with ESA. People can receive Personal Independence Payments alongside Universal Credit, to help with the extra costs of being disabled. “We are committed to supporting people during bereavement and people can apply for a Funeral Expenses Payment while they are waiting to hear about their Universal Credit claim.”
The “punishment beating” of a 17-year old inmate has landed two prison guards in jail. But far from exceptional, this only reflects the daily violence faced by youth in prisons.
‘Frenzy of violence’
Mark Burnett and Daniel Scott were handed jail sentences on 3 December for a “punishment beating” of a 17-year old inmate at Wetherby Young Offender Institution (YOI). The December 2016 attack resulted in Burnett receiving 15 months and Scott 10 months.
The court case revealed the inmate was initially restrained for “assaulting” a third, unnamed prison guard. But Burnett and Scott then took the teenager out of sight of cameras. Then, the Yorkshire Postsaid:
Burnett then delivered a series of punches and upper cuts to the teenager’s face as his arms were held. Scott joined in the attack and threw punches. The violence ended when other prison officers went to protect the inmate.
As a result, the 17-year old was left “gurgling” blood. The BBCreported the teenager went to hospital for a “suspected fracture of the nose and severe bruising”. The Yorkshire Post also said the guards tried covering their tracks following the beating.
When passing the sentences, recorder Ben Nolan described the attack as a “frenzy of violence” and ‘downright brutality’.
Attacks and self-harm
This extreme violence is far from unusual for children in prisons. A freedom of information request from Cardiff University revealed in November a “disturbing extent” of self-harm and violence across the youth prison estate.
The report detailed figures on the rate of self-harm and violent incidents recorded in 2017 across England and Wales’ five under-18 YOIs:
State-run Wetherby YOI’s 184 child inmates experienced 146 incidents of self-harm. They were also on the receiving end of 158 incidents of “proven assault”, though there’s no detail on who committed those assaults. As a rate per 100, that’s 79.3 and 85.9 respectively.
These numbers don’t top the chart, though. The G4S-run Parc YOI in Wales recorded 160 incidents of self-harm per 100 and 282.5 proven assaults. There were 102 and 213.3 incidents respectively at state-run Werrington YOI. Keppel Unit shows abnormally high rates of self-harm at 542 per 100, but is a unit for high-dependency children.
Commenting on the report to the BBC, Andrew Neilson of prison reform charity The Howard League said:
These figures illustrate in graphic detail why prison is no place for a child
Children and young adults (some YOIs hold people up to age 21) don’t only face acts of overt violence in prison. In November 2017, the government’s own prison inspector said it found “far too many boys” were locked up in cells for more than 22 hours a day. This led to senior medical bodies calling for an end to solitary confinement. An October 2018 report by the Children’s Commissioner suggests the practice continues. It said there have been reports of children spending “up to 23.5 hours” in segregated cells “for days and sometimes weeks on end”.
Meanwhile, a 2016 report by prison inspectors focused on the problem of food in YOIs. It said letters from people inside youth jails described food regularly running out or portion sizes being too small. The inspectors directly received complaints about uncooked or undercooked meals. It concluded these were leading to a loss of dignity amongst inmates and concerns for “prisoner and staff safety”.
The environment reflected in these reports and figures has led to widespread drug use. User Voice, a charity run by ex-prisoners, found that 85% of children in prisons they’d spoken to had taken drugs. It quoted one such child as saying drug use is “to suppress feelings and escape the world”.
End Child Imprisonment
Jake Hardy killed himself at Hindley YOI in 2012. He was 17-years old at the time. It happened after bullying by prison staff and other inmates.
Consequently, Hardy’s mum, Liz, helped start the End Child Imprisonment campaign. It was launched on 22 November and is supported by human and prisoner rights groups including Article 39, The Howard League, INQUEST and the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies. The campaign’s goal is to “press for closure of England’s child prisons”.
Youth justice statistics for 2016/7 show 42.2% reoffended again within a year. Like adult prisons, YOIs’ impact on changing behaviour seems very low. It’s also worth noting that 45% of youth in custody identify as coming from Black Asian and Minority Ethnic backgrounds.
Burnett and Scott’s assault at Wetherby YOI is despicable. But it’s wrong to view the brutal attack as an isolated incident. The data shows children are going through hellish environments of stress, fear and violence on a daily basis. This isn’t something that can be reformed. We must get all children out of prisons now.
1] THIS IS THE VERY SAME IMMIGRATION HOLDING FACILITY WHERE G4S EMPLOYEES LIED TO ME IN 2014 TELLING ME CHIWAR MUSA WAS BEING HELD THERE AWAITING HIS DEPORTATION FLIGHT BACK TO NIGERIA AFTER BEING RELEASED FROM HMP AFTER THE TOTALLY QUESTIONABLE 7 YEAR SENTENCE INFLICTED UPON HIM WAS SERVED. AFTER A HUNDRED MILE JOURNEY TO THIS CENTRE TO VISIT CHIWAR I EVENTUALLY FOUND OUT HE WASN’T THERE, AND MY OFFICIAL RECORDED DELIVERY LETTER CONTAINING THE COMPLAINT ABOUT WASTING £80+ IN TRAIN + CAB FARES TO + FROM THE CENTRE WERE LOST “IN THE POST” – MY COMPLAINT HAD THE AUDIO OF THE PHONE CALLS WITH THE CENTRE STAFF CONFIRMING CHIWAR MUSA WAS THERE, WHEN HE WASN’T. AFTER MORE COMPLAINTS TO ROYAL MAIL REGARDING THE MISSING RECORDED DELIVERY LETTERS THEY EVENTUALLY SENT A BOOK OF 1ST CLASS STAMPS AS COMPENSATION. OF COURSE, WE KNOW WHO WAS BEHIND THIS NONSENSE THROUGHOUT.
2] I REPORTED AN OBESE G4S BOUNCER – WHO WAS EMPLOYED AT THE BOURNEMOUTH COTLANDS RD. DWP JOBCENTRE LOCATION – FOR IMPERSONATING DWP STAFF AT THIS BOURNEMOUTH JOBCENTRE A FEW WEEKS BACK – TOTALLY OUT OF ORDER. MY COMPLAINTS WERE TOTALLY IGNORED BY THE DWP, DWP MINISTERS AND ALL OTHERS WRITTEN TO, INCLUDING, OF COURSE, THE COWBOY FIRM “G4S” THEMSELVES. WHAT A WASTE OF TAX MONEY THIS FIRM ARE – EPECIALLY WITH THESE NEW REVELATIONS!
Undercover footage allegedly shows staff “mocking, abusing and even assaulting detainees” at a facility in Gatwick.
G4S, which manages Brook House Immigration Removal Centre in Gatwick, said an investigation was launched as soon as the allegations were made by BBC Panorama.
The programme claims to have undercover footage showing officers “mocking, abusing and even assaulting detainees” at the facility where drugs are allegedly “rife”.
The 448-capacity centre for adult men detained under immigration laws opened in March 2009.
“There is no place for the type of conduct described in the allegations anywhere in G4S, ” said Jerry Petherick, managing director for custodial and detention services.
“Such behaviour is not representative of the many G4S colleagues who do a great job, often in difficult and challenging circumstances, across the country.
“Once we have seen the evidence and concluded the investigation, I will ensure that we take the appropriate action.” [yes, of course you will…NOT!…ed.].
Concerns were raised in a recent inspection which revealed that the average length of detention had increased from 28 to 48 days, with four men held there for more than two years.
The inspection also highlighted issues with the “stark and impersonal” residential units and unsatisfactory sanitary facilities, leading detainees to feel they were being held in prison.
The director of the immigration removal centre, Ben Saunders, said: “Inspectors rightly identify that the purpose-built design is stark in some places and work is already under way to address that, including improving the screening in bathroom areas.
“We will work closely with the Home Office, who own the buildings, to look at how we can further soften the environment, for example by making greater use of the art created by detainees, especially where it has achieved recognition from arts charities.”
Overall the report by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons Peter Clarke in March said it was an “encouraging” inspection.
Brook House was deemed “reasonably good” in all four healthy establishment tests – safety, respect, activities and preparation for removal or release.
“We continue to focus on the care and wellbeing of detainees at Brook House,” said Mr Petherick.
This is a basic account of Day 10 in 74-year-old Sabine Mcneil‘s trial [Monday 03 Dec.] at Southwark Crown Court – use discernment. The prosecution has stopped their argument, and now the defence chimes in, with Sabine McNeil as the 1st defendant to be cross-examined, who has been charged with four counts of stalking and 17 counts of violating a restraining order. She has been on remand in custody since 09 December 2017. The case continues.
Today in the morning at Southwark Crown Court, the jury heard the remainder of DC Steve Martin’s testimony, the defence’s cross-examination, and a list of “agreed facts”—basically, the facts of the case upon which both prosecution and defence were in agreement.
In the afternoon, the defence opened with Sabine in the witness box…but first, let’s take a look at the morning’s events.
Witness 7: DC Steve Martin, continued
Miranda Moore QC, prosecuting, asked DC Martin whether Sabine had claimed that she attended the Church of England Synod in February 2018 in order to gain core participant status with the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA). Martin agreed that this was the case.
However, he said, Sabine had already been denied core participant status. This notification was sent by email, but Sabine did not receive it because at the time, her bail conditions forbade her from using the internet.
Asked when the videos of P and Q had first appeared in Sabine’s Google Drive, Martin said that the earliest date, upon which four videos had been uploaded, was 4 January 2015.
Tana Adkin QC asked Martin about a the document, titled “London Baby-Eaters of Hampstead”, found on HampsteadChristChurch, the blog belonging to Christine Sands. On Friday, Adkin said, Martin had referred to two links at the bottom of that page; she asked about the source of those links.
Martin agreed that the links had been to Tap NewsWire, not to Whistleblower Kids.
Tana noted that Sands’ blog had approximately 19,000 views. Did Martin know the number of views on the Whistleblower Kids site? He replied that he did not know this, and that the site is now defunct in any event.
“‘Page views’ counts all the pages viewed, not just those from people who believe the hoax, is that correct?” Adkin asked. Martin said that this is correct. Adkin noted that by contrast with Sands’ page, Hoaxtead Researchhas had 1.6 million views. [1,673,000 and a bit, but who’s counting?—Ed.]
Regarding Martin’s testimony that Sabine’s email to Theresa May had not contained a bcc, Adkin asked, “What you were doing was looking at Sabine’s computer for this evidence?”
“I went through her email folder line by line, and this was identified in the course of that,” Martin replied.
Asked whether a bcc line would necessarily show up on a printout of the email, Martin stated that he did not know.
Turning to the issue of the red nail-varnish-covered dolls, Adkin asked whether any had actually turned up in any Hampstead businesses.
“None were reported to my knowledge”, Martin said. Similarly, he said that while witnesses had received multiple threats, no one ever went to their homes as threatened.
Asked whether the witnesses had reported receiving threatening emails and phone calls, Martin said he was unable to comment, as he had not been involved in that aspect of the case until 2016. He stated that to his knowledge, one email had been followed up: a female who was bed-ridden and mentally ill had been visited and warned about her behaviour.
Referring to Rupert Quaintance, Adkin asked Martin to clarify that Quaintance had only been convicted of two of the five offences with which he’d been charged, and had been acquitted on the other three. Martin agreed that this was the case.
Turning to the issue of “good character”, Martin confirmed that prior to the Hampstead matter, Sabine had no previous convictions; nor had she had any face-to-face confrontations with the witnesses.
Adkin noted that for her part, Sabine had made police complaints about a brick which had been thrown through her window. On another occasion, her telephone lines had been cut. Martin said that he would not have been involved in those cases, as they were criminal damage complaints.
Noting that a previous witness had said that Sabine stopped posting online when she was imprisoned on remand, Adkin said that in December 2017, Sabine’s bail conditions prohibited her from having access to the internet, and that from that point on she had made no further posts. Martin agreed that this was so.
During re-examination, Moore asked Martin to clarify whether Hoaxtead Research is a blog which supports belief in the Hampstead hoax. “No, they debunk the allegations”, Martin said.
Regarding threats received, either by Sabine or by the complainants, Moore asked whether these represented the entirety of the threats in this case.
“No, they are ongoing and much wider than this inquiry”, Martin said.
Statement of agreed facts
HHJ Sally Cahill QC told the jury that the statement of agreed facts is another form of evidence which should be considered along with the oral and written material they have already received. This statement represents the matters of the case upon which the Crown and defence agree.
Moore read out the statement. The jury heard that Sabine first opened her Twitter account in 2008, using an email registered to 3D Metrics. The domain for Whistleblower Kids was registered on 15 March 2015.
The 19 March 2015 Pauffley judgment was read into the record, including the following:
I am able to state with complete conviction that none of the allegations are true. I am entirely certain that everything Ms Draper, her partner Abraham Christie and the children said about those matters was fabricated. The claims are baseless. Those who have sought to perpetuate them are evil and / or foolish.
All the indications are that over a period of some weeks last summer, P and Q were forced by Mr Christie and Ms Draper, working in partnership, to provide concocted accounts of horrific events. The stories came about as the result of relentless emotional and psychological pressure as well as significant physical abuse. Torture is a strong word but it is the most accurate way to describe what was done to the children by Mr Christie in collaboration with Ms Draper.
The children were made to take part in filmed mobile ‘phone recordings in which they relayed a series of fabricated satanic practices. Subsequently, at the instigation of Abraham Christie and Ella Draper, the children repeated their false stories to Jean-Clement Yaohirou, Mr Christie’s brother in law, in a late night discussion. It lasted for about three hours; Mr Christie and Ms Draper did most of the talking.
P and Q were ABE (Achieving Best Evidence) interviewed on 5, 11 and 17 September 2014. On the first two occasions, they supplied information about events they claimed had occurred, similar in their overall content to the mobile ‘phone video clips and audio recording. On 17 September, in ABE interview, both children withdrew their allegations. Each stated they had been made to say things by Abraham Christie, the mother’s partner, which were not true; and they gave very full details of the way in which he had secured their compliance.
This is a summary of my salient findings –
• Neither child has been sexually abused by any of the following – [their father], teachers at Christchurch Primary School Hampstead, the parents of students at that school, the priest at the adjacent church, teachers at any of the Hampstead or Highgate schools, members of the Metropolitan Police, social workers employed by the London Borough of Camden, officers of Cafcass or anyone else mentioned by Ms Draper or Mr Christie.
• The children’s half brother, his father and stepmother…are likewise exonerated of any illicit or abusive acts involving the children.
• There was no satanic or other cult at which babies were murdered and children were sexually abused.
• All of the material promulgated by Ms Draper now published on the internet is nothing other than utter nonsense.
• The children’s false stories came about as the result of relentless emotional and psychological pressure as well as significant physical abuse. Torture is the most accurate way to describe what was done by Mr Christie in collaboration with Ms Draper.
• Both children were assaulted by Mr Christie by being hit with a metal spoon on multiple occasions over their head and legs, by being pushed into walls, punched, pinched and kicked. Water was poured over them as they knelt semi-clothed.
• The long term emotional and psychological harm of what was done to the children is incalculable. The impact of the internet campaign is likely to have the most devastating consequences for P and Q.
Agreed facts include various statements by Sabine, extracted from her Skype chat account. These include the statement on 20 February 2015 that she planned to upload the police videos next.
While being questioned following her arrest in August 2015 at the Royal Courts of Justice, Sabine made a number of statements during her police interview:
“I have never uploaded the videos”.
“I have uploaded the videos to a private Google account”.
“I have removed the videos from my Google Drive”.
Following Sabine’s trial with Neelu Berry at Blackfriars Crown Court in July 2016, she received and signed a restraining order, which sought to prevent further publication of material concerning Hampstead. At that time, Sabine’s counsel informed her that the terms of the restraining order prevented her from republishing older material as well; the judge in the case confirmed that this was correct.
In October 2016, when Sabine pleaded guilty to breaching her restraining order, Judge Shetty noted that he would describe her breach as more technical in nature. Sabine should assume that the order would be in place all her life.
“If you commit any further breaches”, Shetty said, “I doubt the court would be merciful”. He stated that it was “about time to put all this nonsense behind you, and go on with the rest of your life”, adding that any further breach of the restraining order could result in her being sentenced.
The statement of agreed facts included a chronology of Sabine’s arrests, as well as a list of three videos: one in which Sabine is interviewed with Alfred Lambremont-Webre; one entitled “Hampstead confidential”; and one entitled “Strategising with Sabine”.
This concluded the prosecution’s case. Court adjourned to 2:00 p.m., at which time the defence would present its case.
Witness: Sabine McNeill
Seated in the witness box and sounding quite subdued, Sabine told the jury something of her personal history.
Born in 1944 in Silesia, Sabine described her mother having to flee the Dresden firestorm. Sabine achieved a bachelor’s degree in mathematics and computing, and took a job at CERN in 1964, where she diagnosed software used by scientists. She worked at CERN on the payroll until 1979, and left in 1981. In 1973, she went to Berkeley in California, and during a trip with a physicist friend, was in a car crash during which Sabine’s hip was dislocated.
Doctors suggested that her chronic pain was psychological, which led her to an interest in psychology, which in turn led her to organise four psychological conferences in Europe. She described meeting her future husband, Ian McNeill, at a conference in Wales; they were married several years later.
When her marriage broke up several years later, Sabine remained in the UK, as “there was no reason not to”. Following the end of her marriage, Sabine worked as an event organiser.
She described her early work on computers, prior to the advent of the internet, and her involvement in the first internet café in London. She met Lord Sudeley, and helped him to set up the Forum for Stable Currencies, which Sabine described as an outgrowth of her interest in fighting inequality and poverty.
Sabine described meeting people who had been made bankrupt fraudulently, noting that one of her projects had been to assemble a list of the “worst of all cases”.
Through this, she said she learned about McKenzie friends—lay legal advisors who “hold a person’s hand” in court. Asked whether she became a McKenzie friend, Sabine said her main contribution was to write one-page legal summaries and put them on a website. This site became her Victims Unite! blog.
Referring to the “secrecy of the family courts”, Sabine said that she expected such rules were put in place to protect the identity of the children involved. However, she said, her concern was around parents who wanted to get their children back. This is how she met Ella Draper, she said.
Ella phoned Sabine in 2014, Sabine said. Adkin noted that by November 2014, Sabine was already involved in Ella’s case, and that Ella had already reported her ex-partner to the police.
“She emailed me a document to disclose what the children had told her”, Sabine said, though she said she could not remember whether it was the same document which Adkin showed the jury.
Sabine said she invited Ella to come and see her, as Ella had said she wanted her children back, and had sacked her lawyers.
“She was saying she had been in Morocco with her partner because they were on holiday, and that the children had decided to break their deal with their father”, Sabine said. “She couldn’t believe it herself, she was so shocked. She described to me what they had told her”. Ella gave her the videos later.
Asked whether she had ever questioned Ella’s story, Sabine said she had had “no reason not to believe the children”, and that she had not investigated their claims. “Over Christmas, she left the videos with me” on CDs or DVDs”, she said.
Sabine said she first looked at the videos in January, and that she “vaguely remembered the impact they had on her. She said she was shocked, especially because the alleged abuse was taking place “right around the corner” from her own home.
“I didn’t have any reason not to believe”, Sabine said. “I was too trusting. In hindsight, things look different”.
She said that while she was in touch with Ella daily, she fell out with Abraham Christie quite quickly.
Adkin asked Sabine whether her Google Drive had had something happen to it around this time. Sabine said she’d written to the Barnet councillors, and had uploaded links to the videos as the “most convincing evidence”.
“Barnet Council, then, was the first agency to receive all the videos?” Adkin asked.
“I think so”, Sabine said. She stated they had not been copied to anybody else.
Sabine described “putting a lot of time and effort” into helping Ella. They wanted the police to reinvestigate the case, and to that end Sabine had prepared other legal documents for her: an affidavit, and a judicial review against the police.
“The police had closed the investigation after 12 days”, she said, “so I found an expert who critiqued the police report”. She helped Ella file the papers at the Royal Courts of Justice.
Sabine said her first introduction to Abraham Christie was “strange”: “He came pretty close to me, and said, “I. AM. ABRAHAM”. She said she had asked Ella whether it was “true love” with Abraham, and Ella had replied, “Support”.
Sabine said she knew Abraham had had an influence with P and Q: “He got the children to talk”, she said.
However, after a few meetings with Abraham, Sabine said that they had fallen out. While she could not recall the exact issue, she said she found him “appalling” in his way of talking and thinking.
When Abraham rejoined Ella in London, Sabine said her relationship with Ella changed.
Adkin asked, “Did you suspect in January at that stage that the children might have been lying?”
Sabine said she had not. “For me, the consistency of the story, and the way Ella put it together, was convincing”. She said Ella had told her stories about how P and Q were really nasty to Abraham and Ella.
Adkin asked, “Having met Abraham, did you think he’d been the cause” of the children’s stories?
“He had an influence”, Sabine said, adding that she had not known that “licks” had meant “hitting the children on the side of the head with a spoon”. Ella and Abe’s “big connection was hemp”, which Abraham touted as a recipe for eternal life.
“I cared for the children”, Sabine said. “Ella told me that the reason she took the children to the police was to help the other 20 children”.
“What did you think of this?” Adkin asked.
“I believed it”.
Adkin asked whether Sabine had watched all the videos of P and Q.
“I watched quite a few hours”, Sabine said. “I wasn’t looking for anything; I saw what I saw and I heard what I heard. It was a shocking experience”.
She said that Ella had given her the police videos in late December or early January 2015. She said it took her ages to watch them, and that she believed the police had concealed evidence during their investigation of the children’s claims. While the police had said that the crime was not confirmed, the expert she had brought in had said the investigation was not good enough.
Adkin said, “Ella Draper talked to you, and the videos were given to you—did you have other evidence?”
Sabine said she also had the medical reports, in which anal scarring had been confirmed. “That was another tick”, she said.
Adkin asked, “Were you looking for the negative side of the account?”
“No,” said Sabine. “It was my naïvety, I’d seen so many cases, and this was the worst I’d ever come across”.
Asked whether viewing the interview with P and Q’s father on television had changed her mind, Sabine said, “I’m afraid not”.
“For me”, she said, “Satanic ritual abuse was a new thing. It was the first time children had confirmed what adult survivors had said”. Noting that she had been involved in issues such as forced adoption and child trafficking up to that point, she said her first reaction was, “Is this real? Can this possibly be true?”
Adkin asked whether Sabine had sought information from other sources. Sabine said she’d heard from others who commented on her blog, and that she’d heard about a Canadian therapist’s experience with other survivors of SRA.
“How do you know Angela Power-Disney?” Adkin asked. Sabine said that she’d known her online only, and that she was a sexual abuse survivor, like Becki Percy.
“How do you know they are abuse survivors?”
“They told me”, Sabine said. She said one of the biggest problems she’d had with Angela Power-Disney was her habit of putting people on YouTube without their permission.
Sabine said she had met Belinda McKenzie at a meeting at the Royal Courts of Justice, and that she found her “broad-minded”, though not as interested in monetary issues as Sabine was.
Asked how she met Neelu Berry, Sabine said Neelu had lost her niece, and that this had led to her losing her pharmacist licence. “I don’t remember our initial contact”, she said.
She said she had met “Jacqui Farmer” under a different name—Charlotte Ward—at Belinda’s house. “She had filed another case about the removal of a child”, she recalled. “It was a Belgian guy”.
She stated she had never met Christine Sands in person, but that they had spoken on Skype. “I was aware she had been shouting at the church”, she said.
Asked how all these people had influenced her, Sabine said, “They convinced me that what the children said was true”.
Adkin asked what Sabine had thought when she first saw the Pauffley judgment.
“I was shocked”, Sabine said. “I could not imagine that a judge was so black and white. And ‘evil and/or foolish’? To describe somebody like me?”
“Did you agree with her judgment?”
“No, I’m afraid not”, Sabine said.
“Did the judgment make you question your beliefs?”
“No, it didn’t. Comments were coming in as critical of the judge. I had to take them down because of the trolls….I did take notice, I did write a critique. I did what I did because Pauffley had no intention to return the children to Ella”.
Adkin asked Sabine about trolls.
“They are anyone who uses a non-real avatar”, she said. “They sully others’ sites”. As an example, she cited “a particular guy whose 12-year-old daughter was taken away. He was nasty”.
Asked whether anything had affected her opinion, Sabine said, “Only this court case has begun to open my eyes”.
How did the videos get online?
In response to a question about when the first mention of the children’s allegations had appeared on the internet, Sabine said that during her August 2015 arrest on her return from Berlin, somebody had produced a statement saying that the P and Q videos were online prior to their release in early 2015.
Regarding her email to Theresa May, she said she had sent it to notify May’s office that the petition on Change.org would be sending her a notification every time anybody signed it. She said she had added the bcc to Henry Curteis at Tap NewsWire because his blog was “very wide-ranging” and she felt he needed to be informed.
Adkin suggested that it hadn’t occurred to Sabine that when Curteis received the bcc, he would also receive the emails.
“I wasn’t thinking about that”, Sabine said. She said that she’d sent the email to May out of desperation, as she felt that Barnet Council would not return the children, so “where could I go? They were with foster carers!”
Sabine said that she had not set up her Google Drive for the purpose of sharing the videos of P and Q. She said the settings on the drive varied from file to file. Adkin asked how the Drive was set up, but Sabine responded that she hasn’t been online for a year, so she did not recall how she organised the folders.
However, she said, “I made the big, big mistake of not checking the settings. I had left the top folder open—it was stupid, what else can I say?”
Adkin asked whether, when Sabine sent the videos to May and Curteis, it had occurred to her what was in the videos.
“At that stage, I did not know what I know since this trial”, Sabine said. “I did not realise about the other children they named”. She added that other things P and Q had said, such as their reference to intergenerational patterns of abuse, had helped to convince her that the allegations they were making were true.
“Did it occur to you that this would provide a way of identifying the other children?” Adkin asked.
“That is where I just failed miserably”, Sabine said. “I’m sorry to say that when I saw what I saw and heard what I heard (during this trial), I felt embarrassed and sorry, sorry, sorry”.
Sabine said that during a witness’s testimony about Ella’s list of alleged abusers actually being a class list, the truth had begun to dawn. “When I went through that bundle, I began to question Ella”, she said.
Adkin asked Sabine to describe the “initial document”. Sabine said she’d produced different versions of the 11-page document which Ella wrote, in which the “20 special children” and their parents were named.
“I only know now that it is a big, big question mark”, Sabine said. “I thought it was a list gathered by the children in Morocco”.
“When you saw that list with the names and information about people identified as abusers”, Adkin asked, “did you have any idea what that would mean?”
Sabine said, “Now that I have seen what I saw, why did I not know how people would be affected? Why only today?…For me, it was a story. I could kill myself for not editing the names out. It was unforgivable. I’m really sorry”.
Adkin asked why Sabine had left the details in the Excel spread sheet she’d made.
“I had not woken up”, Sabine said. “I didn’t realise”. She said that she is more interested in numbers, and “this list came up with all these incredible numbers”. She added that she had not numbered the children and parents to be mean—she just wanted the exact figure.
“I have a special relationship with numbers”, she said. “I found the numbers in [a witness’s] statement. Now I know it’s a class list, I know how likely it is that they are all innocent parents”.
Turning to the issue of Rupert Quaintance, Sabine said she had met him through Angela Power-Disney. She had contributed to his GoFundMe as a gesture of support, because “anyone willing to put their time and energy into this was okay with me”.
By the time she met Quaintance, she said, “it had all been arranged by other people”. She added, “I thought he would go to pubs and investigate”.
Asked what she thought he might do, Sabine said, “Whatever he wanted, and make videos. There was no special plan. Everybody was self-motivated”. She said she had found Quaintance to be “brash, full of bravado…it’s an American thing”.
Sabine said that while they spoke on Skype, when they did meet she found him “pretty offensive”.
While she admitted to sending Quaintance the Excel spreadsheet, she didn’t think he really took it on board.
“Did you think he might contact them?” Adkin asked.
“No”, Sabine said, adding that she didn’t know what he was going to do in the UK. She called his bragging about urinating on Christ Church Hampstead “horrible…embarrassing”.
Court adjourned at about 4:15 p.m., and Sabine’s testimony will continue tomorrow at 10:30 a.m.
HAMPSTEAD SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE: “ANATOMY OF A COVERUP” – based on The IPCC Appeal document 01 June + Ella interviews
“This is based on The IPCC Appeal document and we would encourage supporters to contact the IPCC with thoughts or something along those lines.
ANATOMY of a COVER UP
What exactly did the medical reports state?
The police initially attempted to undermine the findings of Dr Hodes and now state that they never received the reports until January 2015 and therefore were not aware of it’s findings. Is it feasible that the findings of a police instructed doctor are not communicated to the police? The police were fully aware of the contents of the medical reports and the conclusive findings. To understand the position of the police, it is important to know what is contained within the reports as that would explain why it is necessary for the police to keep their position of undermining / ignoring the findings and stating that they did not receive the reports until January 2015, as it did not support their “investigation” strategy.
The examinations of the children by Dr Hodes were on 15th and 16th September 2014, after the children were kidnapped /taken into police custody. During the police “investigation”, Dr Hodes prepared 3 reports dated 15th, 16th and 22nd September respectively.
Conclusion of reports dated 15th September 2014, examination date 12th September 2014.
Both the reports dated 15th September 2014 are addressed to a Chantelle Stevens of Family Services and Social work. The fifth and final page of both reports has an address blacked out. This is the address of the police and the name of the person this report was sent to in the police department. The police have claimed that they did not receive this report until January 2015 .
The medical report states;
“(G) In both the general physical examinations of G today, there are physical signs that are consistent with the allegations given by both G and A. The scar in the anus is from a healed fissure, secondary to the application of a blunt penetrating force that he has alleged. In summary, G has physical signs that support his allegations of both physical and sexual abuse”
“In general physical and genital examination of A today, there was evidence of findings consistent with the allegations given by A. These were of inflicted physical injury – physical abuse and insertion of a blunt penetrating instruments into her anus. The scars in her anus are from healed fissures, secondary to the application of a blunt penetrating force that she has alleged”
Report dated 16th September 2014, examination date 16th September 2014.
This report, drafted after Dr Hodes attended strategy meetings on 8th and 15th September 2014, has details of how both children have been repeating their allegations to the foster carers. Upon seeing Vaseline in a shop, G says “is that what they put on my bottom” referring to abuse “from their dad and his friends including Mr. Hollings“
Within the report;
‘A’ described a ‘plastic willy’ to the foster carer and that their ‘dad makes them in his shed’.
‘A’ describes how “’Vaseline original’ in a square container was used on their ‘bottoms and willies’” and sometimes they inserted “plastic willies in her bottom” but sometimes “real willies”. Both children said it hurt less with real willies but that the perpetrators wanted it to hurt them so they used a plastic willy”.
“They also said that they did not want it to hurt so much that it scarred otherwise their mother might discover this when she bathed them” This suggests that the perpetrators took active measures to ensure that the abuse was kept secret and hidden from the mother, Ella Gareeva.
“They both experienced bleeding from their bottoms afterwards…given a wet tissue to wipe it with. They described how they wiped blood or sometimes ‘white stuff’ that came from willies’.
“When asked why they did not tell their mother whilst this was happening, they said they were too scared as their father had told them that he would kill their whole family if they told”
The report describes how the children have nightmares of their “dad killing them” and G said “that he suddenly remembers what happened and his eyes go blurry. He then sees monsters and if he closes his eyes he sees ‘a picture of his dad killing him”. We cannot begin to imagine the amount of pain and fear G must have been going through when he was hoping that the “good policeman” would believe him and his sister.
“G described that when he stayed at his dad’s house for two or three days his dad did not let him go to sleep at night” by being “scary” and putting a “monster costume so that he could not go to sleep”
Summary of findings
“Evident that his (G) experience of abuse has had a significant impact on his emotional well-being.
Further general examination today confirms the physical findings of a scar in the anus from a healed fissure, consistent with inflicted injury from a blunt penetrating force that he (G) has alleged”.
In respect of A, the report states “Based on today’s assessment, it is clear that G and A’s experience of abuse have had a significant impact on their emotional wellbeing. Physical findings today FURTHER CONFIRM the allegations of inflicted anal injury from insertion of a blunt penetrative force, and ARE CONSISTENT with A’s allegations of Sexual abuse”
Medical report dated 22nd September 2014
This report was drafted after she attended strategy meetings on 8th and 15th September 2014 (the appendices 1-2 attached to the report contained notes of the strategy meetings but the local authority and the police failed to provide us with this), supervised the consultations for both children on 12th and 16th September 2014 and spoke to Camden Social workers who informed her of the ABE interview on the 17th September 2014.
The report concludes in respect of A:
“The physical injuries found on her (A) skin are consistent with her allegations of physical abuse..
In the absence of a history of constipation, medical illness and accidental trauma ACCORDING TO THE GP NOTES, the anogenital findings of the scar and the RAD are consistent with her allegations of the application of a blunt penetrating force to her anus..sexual abuse.”
The report concludes in respect of G:
“The physical injuries found on his (G) skin are consistent with his allegations of physical abuse..
In the absence of a history of constipation, medical illness and accidental trauma ACCORDING TO THE GP NOTES, the anogenital findings of the scar and the RAD are consistent with his allegations of the application of a blunt penetrating force to his anus..sexual abuse. “ Police interpretation of Dr Hodes findings by choice of words
Please note the medical report’s use of the words that physical injuries “confirm”, “are consistent” and “evidence of findings consistent with” the allegations of sexual abuse as opposed to the police manipulation of the words to describe and deliberately attempt to undermine the findings of Dr Hodes, such as;
1. CRIS report entry by DS Fernandez 13th September “can be the result of a large solid poo” 2. Police initial response dated 8th July 2015 “could be consistent with allegations of sexual abuse” and 3. Current response dated 24th March 2016“may have been caused by physical abuse in the absence of a medical explanation. The discussion DS Fernandez had with Dr Hodes were such that she verbally reported inconclusive results on the 12th September 2014”
It is clear, that the police have attempted to undermine the findings of Dr Hodes on several occasions by misrepresenting her findings. This is a tactic we are now familiar with as they have endeavoured to do the same throughout the attempted cover up. Even IF the medical reports had stated or used the phrase “could be consistent“ with allegations of sexual abuse, ( which they do not ) this does not negate the duty for the police to investigate further. In fact, it still provides support to the allegations of sexual abuse, as it does not rule it out and therefore is evidence that should be acted upon during the police investigation. It is a note of interest that the police report dated 24th March refers to “absence of a medical explanation”. In the medical report of 22nd September Dr Hodes reviewed all GP notes and noted that there was no past history of constipation or other medical condition that could explain the injuries to the anus area of both children. Therefore, Dr Hodes had reviewed the children’s medical history and confirmed there is no other explanation, other than what the children alleged, as to how the injuries to the anus could have been caused. In fact, the GP notes attached to Dr Hodes report of 22nd September 2014 confirm that that their Mother was concerned about A’s behaviour on 17 January 2011 as the notes state;
“Mother concerned re A’s behaviour. Father given visitation rights last 3 weeks, sees them weekly. Since then A acting strangely, wakes mid sleep at night in hysterics, cries uncontrollably, clinging to mother, sometimes wakes and throws all bedding off the bed”
HAMPSTEAD SRA UPDATE 29 FEB. + LEAKED MEDICAL REPORT + ELLA WITNESS INTERVIEWS including ALFRED WEBRE + IPCC REPORT
“Whilst Americans and some Europeans deal with the challenges faced by survivors and the families of Ritual Abuse and Trauma Based Mind Control. The U.K. and other European Governments engaged in Mind Control programs (involving the ritual sacrifice of countless infants) of their citizens,and children within schools and churches persist in denial. The HAMPSTEAD COVER UP is their Black Swan. The captured lame stream media keep the public sedated, distracted and deceived.
The State and their minions have been caught red handed covering up a case of State sponsored mind control program involving Satanic Ritual Abuse. All the guilty concerned are attempting to ignore the problem whilst hoping that it will eventually go away, yet like a cancerous cyst the problem grows daily with the story now reaching a critical mass of concerned citizens world wide. The lost souls have embarked on yet another offensive, due to the increasing public awareness of the case, particularly by Americans who have their own documented history of SRA/TBMC, The Franklin Cover up, The McMartin Pre School scandal etc. Numerous blogs/websites with information from psychotherapists and survivors who far from remaining in denial, are organising regular conferences where they exchange research information regarding solutions and ways to help survivors and their families. The Sun yesterday put out a 3 page hit piece on SRA siting the Hampstead Cover up and a young Nurse named Carol Felstead ?
Regarding the DA Notice. Ella has been in contact with a researcher from Australia who shared that information with us, and apart from the usual suspects’ smear campaign reflecting Pauffley’s fraudulent judgement in March last year this is the first lame stream media coverage of the case in the Sun yesterday. The site the False Memory Syndrome disinfo.
Regarding the False Memory Syndrome Foundation, Columbia Journalism Review stated:
“Rarely has such a strange and little-understood organization had such a profound effecton media coverage of such a controversial matter. The [False Memory Syndrome] foundation is an aggressive, well-financed PR machine adept at manipulating the press, harassing its critics, and mobilizing a diverse army of psychiatrists, outspoken academics, expert defense witnesses, litigious lawyers, Freud bashers, critics of psychotherapy, and devastated parents.”493
The FMSF has repeatedly cited a study presented at a Harvard conference where researchers were repeatedly able to implant the false memory of mundane tasks like grocery shopping, into their subjects using techniques such as hypnosis.494 It has been championed as proof that memories are easily manipulated. However, research has shown that memories of abuse function very differently than average memories.
“However, leading memory researchers such as Dr. Bessel van der Kolk of Harvard Medical School maintain that traumatic memories, which typically are engraved in the sensorimotor processes, are not subject to the same kinds of contamination that can affect normal memory. Traumatic amnesia, described in the DSM-III-R as psychogenic amnesia, is a phenomenon which has been known to mental health professionals for more than 100 years. The clinically observed characteristics of traumatic memory formation and retrieval match precisely the patterns of memory recovery exhibited by SRA [Satanic Ritual Abuse] survivors, and strongly confirm the reality of their cult abuse.”495
Denial serves no one. Neither victims nor perpetrators. This is not a war. This is an awakening.”
IPCC Upholds Ella Draper’s Appeal [for a 2nd time too – in Jan 2017!] Posted on February 5, 2016
HAMPSTEAD COVER UP: 22 Dec. ’15 ELLA DRAPER / ABRAHAM CHRISTIE – ED OPPERMAN REPORT
After that interview, this from Ella + Abraham:
“We have been aware of David Shurter as a cointel disinfo shill for a while.http://www.dysgenics.com/tag/lying-fraud/ This was confirmed when he lied about knowing Tavitrained Charlotte Ward/Jaqui Farmer, & then staged a fake public falling out with her in a “secret” Facebook group in order to ingratiate himself with us . They worked together on a video in January 2013.
We played along in order to give him enough rope (hemp of course.) He once again exposed his intent, when after arranging an interview with one of his “contacts” a certain Steve, they both persistently attempted to locate us by encouraging us to record the interview via landline. We recorded the interview via Skype, with Shurter and Steve dominating the conversation. We had discussed sharing with their audience the part hempseed nutrition played in the children’s disclosures, but they expressed concern. We explained that the nutritional aspect was an integral part of the case, and they became agitated, so we agreed not to mention it.
Cathy O’brien explains that Cannabis/ Hemp/Marijuana deletes and prevents mind control.
We did NOT argue for an hour and 20 minutes as implied in their latest attempted hatchet job where they expose their obvious intent. We weren’t pleased with the interview, but were grateful for the chance to introduce the case to the American audience. Shurter then organised another interview with Doug Miller, another known F.B.I./C.I.A. agent, which we declined. Shortly after Shurter arranged yet another interview, this time with Ed Opperman.
Opperman obviously knew little of the facts of the case, repeatedly referring to Pauffley’s fraudulent judgement of March 19th 2015. However it wasn’t until we exposed the Trauma Based Mind Control element of the case that he showed his true colours, at one stage denying the veracity of our disclosure by saying,”..but that’s not true”
After the 2 hour show , he requested we do a further hour which we did . We agreed that he would air the show on Christ mass day. He however posted the video on his YT channel on the 22nd of December, and then accused us of leaking the show after 2222 found the show on his YT channel and reposted it. He threatened 2222 with copyright infringement, along with a tirade of verbal abuse insults and accusations.
2222 explained that because Opperman had posted the video on his YT channel it was considered fair game in Child Abuse cases, particularly in this case, where the guilty/State have been attempting to control the narrative and prevent the TRUTH from being revealed. We did tell 2222 & another supporter who were scheduled to interview us that we would do the Opperman interview first as he was waiting and eager. We also recorded the interview using a new mike, as listeners had complained of sound quality of previous interviews.
Ed Opperman seemed genuine, but has accused us of leaking our version to 2222. That is an easily disproven lie, as our vocals on our recording are much clearer due to the new microphone. Why would he do that, and why would we jeopardise the opportunity to reveal the TRUTH to his extensive network of listeners ?
Ed Opperman did express upset at the comments from Dearman’s 40 or so sock puppets,( he created some new socks for Christ Mass)
Youtube pulled 2222’s version but we still have the comments that show Opperman’s true colours.
Neither Opperman nor Shurter have replied to polite emails attempting to resolve what ‘could’ have been a misinnerstanding.
They have however recorded two shows where they blatantly and clumsily attempt to discredit us,( Abraham particularly )
They have been in a Tavispin since we publicly exposed the Tavistate/ British Intelligence, C.I.A. Trauma Based Mind Control aspects of the case, and these accusations are their attempt to discredit us, and control the narrative of the case. They obviously don’t want this info revealed to the U.S. public, and have staged this charade as an excuse not to air the revealing interview.They, (Shurter particularly) are concerned that they are unable to contain the story of State sponsored Mind Control Programs in schools to create an army of New Word Order slaves.
They are unaware that the Hampstead Cover Up is a poisoned chalice to ALL who come with ignoble intent.
The use of Occult practices, Luciferian/Satanic/Wicca, hypnosis, drugs etc. are all elements of State sponsored Trauma Based Mind Control programs, that are used to mislead & cover up the TBMC programs that have infested schools and pre schools/nurseries around the world,so no we haven’t dismissed the occult element in favour of MK Ultra/ Monarch, State sponsored Trauma Based Mind Control programs.We are merely explaining how they all fit together. Their lies and Tavispin are transparent and they are merely the latest to be exposed by the Metaphysics of the Hampstead Cover Up.
Apologies for the length of this explanation, but these agents have dug a rather deep hole which they have proceeded to fall in.
Respect and Best wishes for the New Year.
e & a “
David Shurter: Satanic Ritual Abuse Survivor , Hampstead Theories – “After my Interview… “
SHOCKING NEWS IN THE HAMPSTEAD COVER-UP! Ella and Abraham Present and Update The World Beyond Belief on the Hampstead Affair
This week Ella Draper and Abraham Christie in a live interview bring us up to date on what is happening regarding her two children trapped between a satanic death cult and the UK child protection service racket. Much has happened since the judge’s bogus ruling (devoid of investigation) regarding the fate of the children in a case that involves serious allegations of child sex abuse and infanticide currently happening in Hampstead schools and churches. We are informed that many people are independently researching deeply into this case and finding rather significant links to money laundering, child trafficking and high-ranking officials within the UK government. This is our chance to become knowledgeable about this case and the many others happening now throughout the world and start to do something about these death cults that are currently enslaving the earth. This pod cast does not seek condemnation for the members of these dark satanic cults; on the contrary, Ella and Abraham offer a ray of hope for all the victims/perpetrators trapped in these death cults through his scientific work in the field of plant based blood transfusions and nutrition. We all (Ella, Abraham, Paul and Mindy) feel that the ideal situation would be for these practices to STOP and for all of us to “ascend together.”
For more information regarding this case and others like it:
Below extract from: ELLA DRAPER APPEAL JUDGEMENT TRANSCRIPT 04/08/2015
17. The judge described the allegations as follows. I emphasise she found as a fact that the allegations were untrue. She said: i. “It was suggested that P and Q were part of a large group of children from north London who had been sexually abused, made to abuse one another and that they had belonged to a satanic cult in which there was significant paedophile activity. ii. Specifically, it was said that babies were supplied from all over the world. They were bought, injected with drugs and then sent by TNT or DHL to London. The assertions were that babies had been abused, tortured and then sacrificed. Their throats were slit, blood was drunk and cult members would then dance wearing babies’ skull (sometimes with blood and hair still attached) on their bodies. All the cult members wore shoes made of baby skin produced by the owner of a specified shoe repair shop. iii. Children, it was alleged, would be anally abused by adult members of the cult using plastic penises or “willies.” iv. XXX Primary School in Hampstead was said to be where the “main action” occurred but at least seven other local schools were named. East XXXXX swimming pool was identified as one of the other meeting venues for the paedophile ring. Rituals were performed, so it was claimed, in an upstairs room at the McXXXXXX restaurant where the “boss” allowed child sacrifice because he was a member of the cult. Human babies were prepared, cooked in the ovens within a secret kitchen and then eaten by cult members. v. It was alleged that the children’s father, […], was the leader of the cult and that others included the children’s headteacher, Ms […], another teacher, […], the priest at the adjacent church, a large number of named parents of other children, social workers, CAFCASS officers and police officers. It was said that, in all, more than a hundred people were involved in ‘doing sex’ to the children.” 18. The judge’s conclusions can be summarised by taking her own words at paragraphs 16 and 17 of the judgment: i. “I am able to state with complete conviction that none of the allegations are true. I am entirely certain that everything Ms D [that is the mother], her partner AC and the children said about those matters was fabricated. The claims are baseless. Those who have sought to perpetuate them are evil and/or foolish. ii. All the indications are that over a period of some weeks last summer, P and Q were forced by Mr C and Ms D, working in partnership, to provide concocted accounts of horrific events. The stories came about as the result of relentless emotional and psychological pressure as well as significant physical abuse.”
Why was Dr Hodes’ expert medical evidence ignored?
31 May 2015
Thanks to H, who reminds us:
The statement in Dr. Hodes medical report is: “Physical findings today further confirm the allegations of inflicted anal injury from insertion of a blunt penetrative force and are consistent with the allegations of sexual abuse.”
That is quite clear and unequivocal and in conjunction with the children’s detailed disclosure and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, this should have been enough evidence to prompt an immediate criminal investigation.
Leaked Medical Reports End All Doubt About Sexual Abuse Claims.
The medical reports end any debate regarding the fact that children A and G were the victims of child sexual abuse in Hampstead and underline the criminal nature of the police interviews of September 17th, 2014. The question now is who is being protected? Who has the influence and power to cause the British police such an obvious and inexplicable mid investigation rethink? Clearly there is much more than a Z grade actor and the reputation of a school at stake here. Neither would logically merit the police choice to destroy this investigation and cover up these heinous crimes.
September 5th 2014.
“A referral was made to the Barnet CAIF by (mother’s partner’s) brother in law who is a special constable. Following a disclosure by A and G that they had been sexually abused by their father and “teachers” and were part of a cult. This disclosure had been made when they were in Morocco over the summer. And the parents stated they were unsure who to inform as many people seemed to be involved, (including allegedly police and social workers.)
Initial police interviews conducted.
8/9/14. Initial strategy meeting held.
10/9/14. Visit to family home ahead of ABE interview.
11/9/14. Emergency Police Protection Order issued after the ABE yesterday evening during which witness A, witness G and witness E (mother) were interviewed separately.
Allegations of physical abuse from the mother’s partner towards both children and sexual abuse against both children by their father and “teachers”. They are now in Emergency Foster Placement.”
Police conduct the retraction interviews in transparent attempt to bury the truth and vandalise justice.
Interviewing officers clearly bully false retractions from the children for unknown reasons that can only be sinister.
22/9/14. Police inform the mother E that they have found that the crimes against the children cannot be confirmed. The investigation is over.
22/9/14. Dr. Hodes writes the second medical report affirming the veracity of the sexual abuse allegations despite the retractions. Dr. Hodes cites a specific research finding that found that 16% of victims will retract the allegations and affirming therefore that the physical evidence of abuse should outweigh the retractions.
Lindsay C Malloy, MA Thomas D Lyon JD, and Joia A Quas
Fillal Dependency and recantation of Child Sex Abuse Allegations.
J.Am Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 46:2, 2007.
These statements were made without reference to the disgraceful performance of the interviewing officer in the retraction interviews, which only strengthen Dr. Hodes’ assertions.
The Medical Reports. Who wrote them and are they authentic?
There are two Medical Reports, one dated September 15th, 2014, the other September 22nd. Written on the stationary of the University College of London in a way that leaves no doubt as to their authenticity. Background checks on the names of the people who signed the documents end any doubt . To illustrate this I will cite the best known of the Doctors who have signed these reports Dr. Deborah Hodes (FRCPCH) Consultant Community Paediatrician. A cursory internet search indicates that Dr. Hodes is employed in that role at the University College London and is an expert in the field of child abuse having more than twenty years experience.
The first report dated September 15th appears to have been written by Dr Harriett Gunn (SHO Senior House Officer)* but is also signed by Dr. Hodes, The second Report of September 22nd appears to have been written entirely by Dr. Hodes, as she is the sole signatory.
The Medical Examiners are highly experienced and well qualified.
This does not mean that they are infallible, of course, but these medical reports have been signed by medical practitioners considered to be authorities in the field with decades of experience.
Dr, Deborah Hodes, part of the examination and assessment team that physically examined the children on several occasions is absolutely unequivocal, even after the retraction interviews that the children have physical injuries, that substantiate their claims of physical abuse at the hands of the mother’s partner and more importantly the sexual abuse at the hands of the father and cohorts.
A Brief Overview of the Facts that Emerge from the Medical Reports.
The counter narrative states that the children’s stories were coached and fed to them by their mother’s partner who was himself guilty of minor physical abuse of the children.
The police retraction interviews tried to construct a narrative that the children had been denying the actions of the mother’s partner whilst making the claims against the father and school, yet the Medical Reports show that the children made the claims concurrently and were concurrently examined for both the injuries related to the minor physical abuse at the hands of the mother’s partner and the extremely serious sexual abuse at the hands of the father and staff at the school.
The male has one scar on his anus consistent with blunt force trauma, the female has several and has actually been physically damaged by the abuse in ways that really do not bear mentioning suffice to say that she has multiple injuries “consistent with the application of a blunt instrument.”
They could not be clearer. Someone has been doing deeply unpleasant things to these children, the more lurid claims relating to this case may be exaggerated, but there is a very simple and unmistakeable truth expressed in those medical reports.
After they were taken into Foster care, the children were heard to discuss the use of Vaseline as a lubricant their abusers used on them. They are no longer in the presence of the mother’s partner, there is no need for any story to be told, yet they were speaking about it in a matter of fact way.
The children independently told their story on multiple occasions to numerous Doctors and other disinterested parties and were consistent in their claims against both parties. There was medical evidence to support the claims that were made against both parties.
Both children were observed to be suffering the symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Both children complained at their treatment at the hands of the mothers partner, yet it was absolutely clear to the examiners that it was the father they feared. Each child independently expressed the fear that their father would kill them, one had nightmares about it. Expressions of fear do not get more profound than that.
The details outlined in these reports are deeply unpleasant. Unfortunately it is necessary to do this and I will ensure that only the completely necessary information is included. There is a duty to attempt to spread the truth in a matter of gross injustice such as this case represents and I have sought not to identify anyone by name other than the Doctors whose role appears to have been an honourable one.
Key Excerpts from the Two Medical Reports.
September 15th, 2014.
“Witness G “does not report any history of constipation or diarrhoea . However he does report that it does often hurt and he has often bled when opening his bowels although this had decreased significantly in the past two months which his sister says is because it is two months since they have seen their father. (the children were also removed from the school). He opens his bowels everyday and reports that his stool is soft. “( a detail that is unfortunately necessary due to later events)
“Both G and A report that they have been hit multiple times with a metal spoon by mother’s partner over the head and the legs. They also report they have been pushed into walls. They also allege that mother’s partner holds his hand over their mouth till they “can’t breathe.” On a recent visit to Morocco over the summer witness G explains that he was hit on the ear by the mother’s partner in the left ear which caused his ear to bleed and his left eye to be swollen and bruised. G and A said that G was then not allowed to leave the holiday home until the bruises had disappeared.”
(Note: the details contained here completely destroy the notion that these allegations were made as the result of coaching. Did the mother’s partner also coach the children to make all these detailed and specific allegations against him? Of course he didn’t. The fact that these allegations against the mother’s partner were made at the same time as the allegations of sexual abuse is clearly overwhelming evidence that these children spoke the truth to the best of their ability about both issues and were not under external control of either party to a custody dispute as they made the allegations.)
Sexual abuse allegations.
“ A has explained that at school a teacher named Mr. H calls children over and makes them take off their underwear. A explained that she and other children including G are made to bend over and a “plastic willy” is inserted into the anus. Whilst Mr. H holds onto their hips. A also stated that Mr.H “makes noises” while this is done.
Of note, she says that he gives them a refresher bar to eat as a reward and to chew on while this is happening so they “can’t scream or make a noise” and they are asked to face forwards and not look backwards. G has said that the same thing has happened to him. G says that after this has happened he has bleeding from the anus and subsequently. it is very painful when he opens his bowels.”
Victim G Physical injuries described.
His (G) anus was examined in the left lateral position using gentle buttock separation for 30 seconds. He had one anal fissure scar at 9 o’clock on examination of the anus. There was no reflex anal dilation.”
“In both the general physical examination and the genital examination of G today. There are physical signs consistent with the allegations given by G and A. The scar in the anus is from a healed fissure, secondary to the application of a blunt penetrating force that he (G) has alleged.
In summary, G has physical signs consistent with his allegations of both physical abuse and sexual abuse. “
Dr. Harriett Gunn (SHO) to
Dr. Deborah Hodes.
Medical Report Dated September the 22nd 2014.
The report begins with Dr, Hodes outlining her extensive experience in the field. Twenty four years worth.
Dr.Hodes states that she was present at two strategy meetings and two physical examinations relating to this case. In addition Dr. Hodes has spoken to Camden area social workers and also reviewed the photographic evidence pertaining to the children’s injuries.
Summary of Relevant Evidence Victim A..
“She alleged that lubrication was used prior to the insertion of the penis or plastic penis and identified and discussed this with her foster carer.. She also told me about having had an injection. She alleged that bleeding occurred after the event and then had pain on opening her bowels.”
“She told me that she has difficulty getting to sleep and she has bad dreams including dreaming of her father killing her ”
“Below is a list of injuries found in a physical examination of A shown in body maps and the police photographs.”
1.“3 x 4mm abrasion to the pinna of her left ear and 3mm laceration posterior to her left ear overlying the mastoid, A alleged she was pinched and picked up by her ear on Morocco.”
2. “7mm longtitudinal abrasion (excoriated) on the right lateral aspect of her right ankle. A alleged she had been pushed against an outside wall and “had picked it” when she was in Morocco.”
3. “2.0cm x 0.5cm healing abrasion on the left side of the chin. A alleged that she was hit across the face with a metal spoon while in Morocco.“
Below is a list of injuries found on ano-genital examination of A recorded in the DVDs.
(Warning Note: This is deeply unpleasant and awful and a quick summary is that there are multiple and in my opinion horrific injuries to A’s nether regions)
“1. In the left lateral position with gentle buttock separation there was anal laxity and a brief view of the rectum. In the knee chest position with gentle buttock separation, there was reflex anal dilation (RAD) after 5-10 seconds. The reflex anal dilation continued and there was a view into the rectal ampulla and there was no stool present.
2. There was a healed scar in the ruggae at the 10 -11 o’clock position extending from the anal orifice to the anal verge. It was seen in both the left lateral position and the knee to chest position. The abnormalities in the ruggae at the 4 0′ c;ock and 5 o’clock positions may represent healed scar tissue or variation in the ruggae.configuration.”
There are between two and four injuries, with two undoubted and two speculative.
Conclusions regarding the allegations.
“The physical injuries found on her skin are consistent with the physical abuse she described.
In the absence of a history of constipation, medical illness or accidental trauma according to the GP’s notes, the anogenital findings of the scar and the RAD are consistent with her allegations of the application of a blunt penetrating force to her anus (2); sexual abuse.”
She has described symptoms of post traumatic stress.”
Summary of A and G by Dr. Hodes.
“In my opinion A and G are suffering significant harm as evidenced by the following:-
1.Both children have physical signs of physical abuse that support their allegations.
2.Both children have physical signs of sexual abuse that support their allegations.
3.They have symptoms of post traumatic stress.
4. It is now understood from a 2007 substantiated study of child sexual abuse that retraction occurs far more commonly (16% in this series) than previously thought.
5. In my opinion, the extensive and detailed accounts given by both children that were repeated to different professionals contain details of sexual acts that such young children would need to have direct experience of.” (Note: in order to be able to describe them is the unwritten implication.)
To put it simply, Dr. Hodes is stating that there is physical evidence in support of both sets of allegations which really highlights how farcical the entire “they were coached” counter-narrative really is. Because children who have been coached to make false allegations in order to influence a custody battle we are told, were not even coached to lie about the minor physical injuries they suffered at the hands allegedly of the mother’s partner. What kind of coaching is that?
It really shows the desperation to protect that this preposterous and absurd notion was even floated as the counter-narrative. It is pathetic and insulting. Truly laughable.
Ethical and Legal Issues.
The leaking of these documents may constitute a criminal offense, I honestly do not know, but it is obvious that these records have been released in the broader public interest in order to oppose and expose a clear and outrageous injustice. These are exceptional circumstances in which otherwise unethical or even unlawful actions are necessary and just in my opinion.
Why is this happening?
It beggars belief that this investigation was curtailed and destroyed in order to protect a Z grade actor or even the Staff and Institutional reputation of the school and church involved. Something far more important is being protected here, but it is completely unclear whom or what have managed to engineer the stunning travesty that led to the Investigating Police coaching and bullying retractions from the child victims, Witnesses and Victims A and G.
The real mystery at this point is who is protecting this and why?
The way it is being covered up you would almost get the on it’s face ludicrous idea that this was some type of mad, satanic leadership induction program. The people involved may believe they are doing what is right for their children in some sick parallel universe sense.
We Are Living in a Twilight Zone of Serial Denial.
It is completely possible that elements of the stories the children tell that do not relate to events they actually witnessed may be embellished or even incorrect. There is sadly no doubt that whatever the veracity of the claims the police made a decision, a bizarre and inexplicable decision to destroy the case and conduct a cover up. Unless and until the police have a rethink as is inevitable but may take decades, there is little that can be done to even begin to seek justice for the Hampstead victims beyond trying to expose this to enough people that it causes an uproar that requires an immediate police rethink.
We seem to exist in a bizarre twilight zone where anyone with any connection to power can apparently do what they like to children and expect to suffer only the infamy of the grave. As long as you are not fussed about your reputation when deceased and you are connected you do not even have to be discreet. Once you die it will all emerge of course and your name and reputation will be destroyed but other than that there is no penalty.
While it has become clear again and again that the unthinkable has actually been rather routine, that these unbelievably evil crimes have been happening for decades and yet when confronted with a genuine contemporary cover up, the entire “official” British media have literally not a word to say.
Other than the Hamptead and Highgate Express. The local weekly paper had their say recently, they covered the story from the point of view of the alleged perpetrators, predictably, so the reference to the case was rather incidental, but telling.
Google under fire after leaked personal details of Hampstead residents remain on web – Crime & Court – Hampstead Highgate Express
The real story is instantly dismissed thus “The claims, which the mainstream media is barred by court order from reporting on, are said to have been investigated by police and found to be baseless.” Which I think can be fairly claimed to be a downright lie. Perhaps gratitude is the right response to the total lack of mainstream news coverage. Please note the brazen hypocrisy of the Hampstead and Highgate Express stating that “ which the mainstream media is barred by court order from reporting on” before continuing “are said to have been investigated by police and found to be baseless.” Clearly reporting (and indeed completely mendaciously and inaccurately) without naming or even alluding to a source, let alone any evidence to back up their dishonest claim. I hope they are proud of their work at the Hampstead and Highgate Express. Their efforts in support of evil will be rewarded in the deserved manner eventually I am sure, one way or another. It’s only a matter of time.
Return #WhistleblowerKids and #AbuseSurvivors to their Russian Family!
1. The duty of confidentiality
Confidentiality is an essential requirement for the preservation of trust between patients and health professionals and is subject to legal and ethical safeguards. Patients should be able to expect that information about their health which they give in confidence will be kept confidential unless there is a compelling reason why it should not. There is also a strong public interest in maintaining confidentiality so that individuals will be encouraged to seek appropriate treatment and share information relevant to it.
Using and disclosing information
3. data should be anonymised wherever possible .
occasionally, when it is not practicable to obtain consent, information may be disclosed where the law requires or where there is an overriding public interest, eg where child abuse is suspected
• disclosures should be kept to the minimum necessary to achieve the purpose
Information may be used more freely if the subject of the information is not identifiable in any way.
Usually, data can be considered to be anonymous where clinical or administrative information is separated from details that may permit the individual to be identified such as name, date of birth and postcode. Even where such obvious identifiers are missing, rare diseases, drug treatments or statistical analyses which have very small numbers within a small population may allow individuals to be identified. A combination of items increases the chances of patient identification.
When anonymised data will serve the purpose, health professionals must anonymise data to this
extent and, if necessary, take technical advice about anonymisation before releasing data. Whilst it is not ethically necessary to seek consent for the use of anonymised data, general information about when their data will be anonymised should be available to patients.
*S.H.O Senior House Officer A junior doctor in the pre Modernising Medical Careers era (pre-2007) of training in the UK, in the 2nd post-graduate year–i.e., immediately after the PRHO–pre-registration house officer year, which is now designated Foundation Year 1–FY1. SHOs are now called FY-2. Some SHO posts still exist and are taken as a prelude to certain specialities–e.g., surgery, but are no longer a standard year in training schemes for junior doctors in the UK
Whoever threw two dogs out of a moving vehicle on the M25 motorway near London earlier this week deserves to be locked up.
The culprit, who was going around 60mph, is not only responsible for the death of a helpless and trusting dog but also put the lives of dozens of motorists at risk with their careless act.
Witnesses said they were driving down the M25 when all of a sudden two dogs were thrown out of a moving vehicle. One of the dogs was killed instantly by oncoming traffic. The other, a small Jack Russell Terrier nicknamed Tarmax, managed to avoid cars and make it to the roadside.
Luckily, Tarmax will survive but the sick individual responsible for this cruelty must be caught. The next time they strike the carnage could be even worse.
Ask law enforcement to do everything in their power to find the person responsible and bring them to justice.
Received: It appears MK is still on hunger strike – and he will have lost 4 stones by the date of his supposed release on the 13th December, as he states in his latest, below. He states also that writing paper, envelopes and more are now denied in a last ditch attempt to stifle any news coming out of HMP Parc. He asks “Why am I classed “high risk” not to be released to live in England?”:
Another note states “9 seperate days I have had to cut my legs to get prescription “omeprazole” but no longer will stitch!” [no. 7 in the list here:
No. 12 states: “Still on h/s [hunger strike] as denied enterologist consultation”
Archive: Maurice is serving a highly questionable 2 year sentence, beginning on 14/12/2017 in HMP Parc, Bridgend, Wales – the archive of posts here with MK’s updates from HMP Parc: