THE MUSA CASE: FROM THE S.R.A. 25 NOV. 2011

Hi,
Regarding the many crimes and irregularities enacted by government personnel connected to the Musa case of 6 children removed via allegations made by Haringey council that were later found to be unfounded and without merit some months back i submitted an official complaint about the solicitor for Haringey council ROSITA MOISE to the Solicitors Regulatory Authority {pls see attatched} who plays a big part in this shocking case.
 

Finally i have received a message today relating to my complaint {below} from the Solicitors Regulatory Authority but of course it remains to be seen whether any action is actually and realistically taken. So far the official complaint about the criminal “guardian solicitor” J. Houghton, has got nowhere, as havent judges reveiews. Other complaints re: other personnel are ongoing.
One shockingly serious aspect of this case, in which the Haringey solicitor ROSITA MOISE played a pivotal part was the removal and subsequent disappearance of the Musas’ now 11 year old daughter FAVOUR MUSA. This child was sexually molested during the early months of her being removed whilst living at the foster home provided by CAPSTONE VISION AGENCY, contracted to Haringey council, the molester of Favour being the teenage member of the family there. Favour told her father on a contact visit some 16 or so months ago about this sexual abuse upon her, and since that happened she has not been seen since by any family member or indeed any diplomat from the Nigerian High Commission, London, either who know her and her family well yet have been refused all leave to see her. Any question regarding her well-being remain unanswered by Haringey council whenever her parents ask about her. I personally have informed numerous authorities about the entire situation regarding Favour to receive no feedback whatsoever from agencies such as Dorset police, the Chief Constable of Dorset, 6 foster care agencies and regulatory bodies, 635 MPs, the Victims Support Commissioner Ms. Louise Casey, numerous members of Haringey council and many more.

WHERE IS FAVOUR MUSA?  IS SHE DEAD?  HAS SHE BEEN SHIPPED ABROAD? WHERE IS SHE? WHY WILL HARINGEY COUNCIL SAY NOT ONE WORD ABOUT THIS CHILD?
WHY WILL NO MP ANSWER ANY COMMUNICATION ABOUT HER, FOR THEY HAVE BEEN WRITTEN TO OVER AND OVER BY MYSELF TO NAME JUST ONE PERSON WHO HAS NOTIFIED AUTHORITIES?
 WHY HAVE ALL COURT ORDERS REGARDING CONTACT VISITS BEEN BROKEN AND IGNORED? 
 
SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG HERE!! THE LOCAL MP DAVID LAMMY HAS IGNORED SCORES OF EMAILS IVE SENT TO HIM BEGGING HIM TO HELP THE MUSA PARENTS MAKE CONTACT WITH HER.  I AM IGNORED AND SCORES OF OTHER SUPPORTERS ARE IGNORED EVERY TIME!!  WHY?
 
Below is an email I received today from the SRA regarding the Haringey solicitor who is instrumental in her disappearance – ROSITA MOISE, along with other communications sent regarding her disappearance, including the “Sunday Telegraph”‘s Christopher Bookers published article regarding her from June 2011 {just one of 13 about this case}.
 
This is a true sworn statement.
 
Thank you.
 
sincerely,
 
J. Graham   25 Nov. 2011
 
The Baylis family: please see: http://baylis-family.info/author/justice/
 
http://www.turnitaround.co.za/petition/22/get-their-children-back-children-trafficked-by-uk-social-services#.TsIRicUpo8c.facebook
 
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Help-protect-the-Baylis-family/102522509856003?sk=wall

*****************************************************************************
 
From: Report@sra.org.uk
To: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:19:45 +0000
Subject: CDT/1021608-2011

Our ref:    CDT/1021608-2011/Gordons CIU

 Private & Confidential

Mr J Graham

 By Email: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk

 25 November 2011

 Dear  Mr Graham

 Professional conduct

Your report about Rosita Theresa Moise of London Borough Of Haringey

 I write further to our email of 2 November 2011.  In order to deal with the concern you have raised we have passed the matter to Gordons LLP of Forward House, 8 Duke Street, Bradford, BD1 3QX, a firm of solicitors working on our behalf, for them to investigate the matter.  The Solicitors Regulation Authority outsource matters on a regular basis to help manage its business/operations.  Gordons LLP are appointed as agents of the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to investigate reports of misconduct.  As such, Gordons LLP are required to investigate in accordance with the procedures put in place by the SRA

Gordons LLP will consider the information that you have provided and carry out any investigation, which may be necessary.  Please note that a copy of your initial correspondence may be sent to London Borough Of Haringey.  Gordons LLP will be using Solicitors Regulation Authority letter headed paper in this matter, to make it clear that they are working under contract to us. A member of staff from Gordons LLP will contact you within the next 7 working days.

 The Solicitors Regulation Authority will inform you of the final decision.

 If at any time during our investigation you do have any queries or concerns about our service, please let us know.  We have an internal complaints procedure to deal with these issues, and we will do everything we can to resolve your complaints and respond positively to your comments.

If you have any queries in the meantime, please contact me at the above address or on the number below.  It would be helpful if you quote the reference number provided above when contacting me.

 Yours sincerely

 

Triage & Outsourcing Officer

Outsourcing & Operations Support Unit

 **Please quote our above reference whenever contacting us**

If corresponding by e-mail please quote our reference in the subject heading

 Direct line 0191

Direct fax 019106

report@sra.org.uk 

 This email, and any attachment, is intended for the attention of the addressee only. Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return email and send a copy to postmaster@sra.org.uk. Thank you for your co-operation.
Please note the author of this email is not authorised to conclude any contract on behalf of the Solicitors Regulation Authority by email.
————————————————————-

And a letter to the foster agencies of the UK:
From: butlincat . (adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk)

Sent:
 08 June 2011 11:19:48
Dear Sir / Madam,
I, as a concerned citizen, have to draw your attention to some gross irregularities concerning the dealings of the company detailed below: “Capstone Vision Foster Care Limited” and certain employees of that company.
There are 2 main areas of concern I have to relate, the first being a child being “inappropriately touched” whilst in the care of carers employed by the company detailed, contracted to Haringey council. The child, Favour Musa, complained of being “inappropriatly touched” – in more formal terms being “sexually molested” – whilst in the care of a people I would rather not give the names of because I am not sure about legal recriminations, or I most certainly would. The people I understand are/were carers for the 9 year old Favour Musa at the time the event{s} occurred, and who are/were employed by this company.The person allegedly committing the offence{s} was the teenage son of the senior female carer, also apparently an employee of this company residing at the time of the incidents described at the home of the senior female carer and the child Favour Musa, the child having been placed there by Haringey council with a terrible history in child care. Indeed, since the child complained and alleged the event of being “inappropriately touched”, the child and the Musa family have been denied contact visits together. This is illegal and completely contrary to their human rights anyway.
I implore you to please investigate the company “Capstone Visions Foster Care Limited” and its employment of of clients who do what is alleged by this child Favour Musa as it is totally unacceptable and a serious crime too.
The Musas are never given any information about their daughter when they inquire and it is not known if the child is alive or dead, or even in this country. I have related the offence of the child being “inappropriatly touched” to a police force who completely ignored it, as did the Chief Constable Martin Baker after I xontacted him abot this appalling situation. I feel these too are serious matters which are of grave concern also when a serious crime is reported to 2 seperate entities and ignored, for a 9 year old child being “inappropriatly touched” whilst in the care of dubious people is indeed a very serious crime.
The second matter I wish to relate is that the contact visits undertaken by the Musa parents Chiwar and Gloria, ordered by the court to see their children were often not to the requirements of that official order. By that I mean that very often the parents would travel the great distance to see their children only for:
a} the centre to be shut, and obviously the visit cancelled and not undertaken WITH NO PRIOR NOTICE OR INFORMATION GIVEN to the Musas –
b} that very often instead of the 4 children being present for the visit one or two children would not be present, which is contrary to the courts instructions. On occasion Mr. Musa has been ejected from the contact visit after only minutes of the visit by the centre staff for no discernible reason, making a mockery of the entire event and depriving both parties concerned – the children and the parent – valuable time together.
These 2 items Im sure youll agree are very serious and have caused great distress to both the Musa children, Favour in particular as being the alleged victim of sexual harrassment, a very serious crime, and the Musa parents. I ask you to investigate this company with its unacceptable, very lax business practices and its employment of a very inappropriate character who is reported to have committed a very serious crime against a minor.
This is a true sworn statement.
Thank you.
J. Graham
——————————————————————————————————-
 “Sunday Telegraph” reporter Christopher Bookers articles about the Musa family torture at the hands of Haringey council:
STILL NOTHING HAS BEEN HEARD ABOUT THIS MISSING GIRL AS OF 25 NOV.   2011:
SUNDAY 12 6 11:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8570173/The-mystery-of-Haringeys-missing-Girl-X-makes-a-mockery-of-the-Children-Act.html
The mystery of Haringey’s missing ‘Girl X’ makes a mockery of the Children Act
The family of a girl taken into care have not seen or heard from her for 10 months, writes Christopher Booker.
                       ======================================
 

About butlincat

my blog: http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com http://www.youtube.com/butlincat http://www.twitter.com/butlincat
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s