PRISON VISITS TO GLORIA AND CHIWAR MUSA, TUES. 14 FEB. 2012

We have discovered that a so-called  “follower” of this blog, a “Sparkle6584715”   is definatly NOT a supporter of the Musa family in any shape or form !!   

Ample evidence suggests the complete and utter opposite!!

Neither Gloria nor Chiwar has ever met her, yet this character got into a court hearing on the 12th January with the aid of another so-called supporter – BOTH AS McKENZIE FRIENDS – this skullduggery led to this “Sparkle”   making a signed statement for the prosecution team opposing  the Musa’s freeing of their children placed in foster care via false allegations, their release from their present incarceration in prison on the most dubious of charges and countless other crimes and breaches of the Musa parents and their 6 childrens human rights  courtesy of Haringey council. 

THIS IS A TRUE SWORN STATEMENT!!

  BE AWARE!!

                                         —————————————————-

I visited Chiwar on Tuesday 14 Feb, at Pentonville prison, and Gloria also after at Holloway prison.

Still no word has been given of Favour Musa, now 11, who disappeared after telling her parents of her being “inappropriatly touched” – sexually molested, by a teenage member of the foster family she was originally placed with. All official complaints to the police, MPs, a Chief Constable and many more including consequently the Solicitors Regulation Authority and the Legal Ombudsman about this case and the abuse suffered by Favour Musa and her subsequent disappearance to these government representatives  have always been completely ignored by these people we are led to believe we could go to and rely on if anything ever happened to a tiny child as has happened to Favour Musa.  Favour, who has also had her name changed,  has not now seen her parents  for over 18 months, and even Amnesty Internatinal turned their backs on the case too. Amnesty International ARE NOT who they claim to be, and i have emails and recorded calls from them where they openly shirk what they say theyll do on their publicity blurbs. 

 Gloria is still not too well with her painful knee injury, that still not having received any treatment of any kind from anybody. She tells me she is still only drinking fluids.
This is the video of what happened when the Musas shouldve been present at their 12 Jan hearing:-  http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=102aabdaceb3ddefd665e13&skin_id=1602&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url  –  Even the prison staff are wondering why she is there in prison, as she actually has committed no crime against anybody, as Chiwar hasnt either.
All the charges and allegations against the Musas in this entire case are false, and can be proven so. There needs to be an official investigation or a public enquiry into this appalling case where so many crimes have been committed against this family – foreign nationals – by certain people.
There is someone who claims to be a supporter of the Musas, by the name of “Sparkle” -= a “Rachel Hadley”. This character was previously completely unknown to both Musas prior to last December, yet came across making out she was a friend and supporter then, when in reality the truth is she was more than likely being paid by Haringey council to infiltrate, phish and therefore damage the entire case by feeding her handlers what she had learnt. This person was in the 12 Jan. court hearing with another “supporter”, them both in the court {where even the Musas were disallowed from being at} as McKenzie friends {a McKenzie friend is a defendants aide in the court, to assist with the legal technicalities etc with the defendants, + to take notes etc.}. With the Musas being disallowed at the hearing it is strange how these 2 so-called McKenzie friends got in at all – as one was not only a stranger to the Musas but who has since written and signed a statement for the prosecution against them. What was going on here?  We must ask the question are the people aiding and abetting this usurper “Sparkle”  connected to the disappearance of Kay Young?  Investigations continue in more than a couple of countries now.

{I am of course willing to be sued should anything Ive written here be unfactual}.

…namaste..butlincat  16 Feb. 2012

The Musa Interviews, April 2010,  before the baby was removed:

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=f71b095d9231daf1eb937c&skin_id=1604&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

by butlincat » Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:56 pm

THE MUSA CASE – 6 CHILDREN REMOVED VIA FALSE ALLEGATIONS BY HARINGEY COUNCIL :

On the 8 April 2010 8 policemen let themselves in by key to the Musa family home in Haringey North London and removed the Musa’s 5 children without any notice or prearrangement. The children were removed on what later were found to be totally untrue allegations made by certain employees at Haringey council. All allegations have been disproven, the allegations ranging from the children not being the Musas offspring and were being trafficked, to the children being beaten and generally mistreated by their parents.
Regarding the child trafficking allegation that the children were not the Musas offspring and they were in fact part of a child trafficking network, DNA tests instigated by the Musa parents, and taking a phenominally long 5 months to undertake and reach a viable result proved without a shadow of a doubt that the children were indeed the Musas children, and the children were in no way being trafficked in any shape or form. After this allegation was disproved other equally ridiculous allegations were made to keep the children from returning to their once happy home. One such allegation that was made was that Gloria Musa was an active sex worker – a prostitute – who plied her trade in front of her church congregation and also in front of her children. She is, in fact. an ordained bishop in the Evangelical Church of Africa and is not and has never been what this allegation alleges. This ridiculous allegation was made with no evidence of any kind to substantiate it yet the court believed this nonsense, along with other unsubstantiated allegations such as the children being by the parents, even though medical examinations made when the council took the children showed no sign of anything to back their allegations of cruelty by the parents towards their children. Even though the allegations were proven groundless never was it mentioned that the children were to be returned to their parents as they should have been, of course. Quite the opposite in fact took place in that a 6th child was removed from the Musa parents, the hitherto unborn baby at the time of the April 8 2010 child removals. The baby Queen Elizabeth was stolen once at her birth, the violence of the police during the removal operation in the hospital at 3 in the morning directly after Gloria the mother had just given birth nearly killing this defenceless mother. The baby was returned later after a matter of weeks, but was stolen again on even more dubious allegations on June 28th 2011, and the parents have not seen the baby since that date. The baby’s removal, like the entire case, needs a thorough investigation far away from the despicable corrupted entities that are thriving within this area of London who are dealing with vulnerable defenceless children, and their parents.
During the time the children were removed the eldest, now 11 year old Favour Musa, complained of being “inappropriatly touched” – sexually molested in other words – by the teenage habitee of the foster home she was placed in. Ever since this child complained of this appalling sexual harrassment, over 18 months ago, she has not been seen by any family member or anybody from the Nigerian High Commission – some of whom are actually Godparents to certain Musa children. It is not known whether Favour Musa is alive or dead, or is even in this country as the council refuse to say anything about the child when the parents enquire after her. She has simply vanished.There is a £1000 reward been offered by an anonymous donor for her giving her testimony on video. The council and their cronies have also changed Favours name to “Lizzie”. This article on “Parent Alienation Syndrome” shows how changing a childs name,location and lifestyle can turn her away from her loving parents and all she knew before her removal and the subtle changes introduced:
http://www.coeffic.demon.co.uk/pas.htm – .
Although commonly used in divorce cases it can of course be used to alienate parents after the child is moved into a foster home.
Recently on the 28th June 2011 the Musas took their baby to St. Thomas’s hospital, London as they thought she seemed to have a fever – a temperature. This was enough for Haringey council to arrange for the police to remove the baby, claiming it had been administered hard drugs, even though tests taken by medical staff at the hospital at the time proved negative for all drugs in not only the baby but also in both parents. Nevertheless an Emergency Protection Order {EPO} was placed on the baby immediatly and she has been removed from the Musa family, even though the reasons for the baby’s removal are totally fictional. At a court hearng on the 7th July the judge, who happened to be the original judge who ordered the removal of the other 5 children, believing the Haringey councils allegations, confirmed he would be issuing an Interim Care Order {ICO} on the newly taken baby, thus effectively removing her from the parents care, when a 2 week period was up. This he duly did, and the baby Elizabeth has not now been seen since 28th June, some 8 months ago from the date of her removal. For no contact visits to be allowed during this period is totally illegal, against all orders the court has made regarding the childrens contact visits with their parents, against the “Childrens Act” and against the parents and baby’s Human Rights.
After a 6 day factfinding hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice with the president presiding over the case it was deemed, by the “balance of probabilities” that the baby was given drugs which very nearly led to its death and therefore she must be stolen from her parents. This was assumed after much evidence was given by hospital staff and others. There should be an honest investigation into this evidence and I say this as a Mckenzie friend for the defendants who was there at the time for 4 days of this hearing and, quite frankly, was disgusted at everything he saw and heard that took place during his 4 days in the courtroom.
Allegation by the council, in the early stages of this case, were that Gloria Musa was given opium by her stepfather whilst in the UK as a teenager. These are complete lies, yet were part and parcel of the allegations used to remove and keep these childrenis completely untrue. Gloria Musa has no stepfather, has never taken opium at any time, and was not in the UK as a teenager. This is just one totally false allegation fabricated by the council and used in the removal of the Musa children. It has been said by the president of the secret closed family courts that “professionals dont lie”. This in itself is an outrageous lie which should be ignored completely always. There is overwhelming evidence of lies being told in this Musa case let alone numerous other now famous caes of child removal in the UK such as the cases of Vicki Haigh, Maureen Spalek, Cheryl Stannard, Eve Pears, the Baylis family and others
Many other irregularities and anomalies exist in this outrageous case, from outright witness intimidation at least 5 people familiar to the Musa parents to police conducting raids with no warrant or legal documentation whatsoever and without the necassary witnesses required by British law. The court orders concerning contact visits with the children have not been adhered to by the agency responsible for them on scores of occasions, and nothing is ever done about this, causing much unneccassary grief, worry and financial hardship to these parents who have been targetted by Haringey council employees and those connected to it. Supporters have written hundreds of emails and many letters sent by postal recorded delivery to MPs and other so-called “authority figures” {such as police and a Chief Constable} all of which have been totally ignored, have made each and every person told absolutely aware of so many irregularities an and crimes committed in this appalling case and who exactly has undertaken what is described. Even so nothing is ever done about anything by anybody clearly and concisely told about the unacceptable events, even when trying to inform them of a 9 year old girl {at the time} being sexually molested by a teenager she was sadly placed at the home of.
The Musa parents were remanded in prison on the 31 November and are still there awaiting trial, which began on 1 Febuary but adjourned yet again until the 29th Febuary because the prosecution legal types hadnt done the necessary work which would allow the case to begin. The cover-up is extreme in this case, with the usual unacceptable court injunctions on its reporting publicly in place. What has gone on is disgraceful and everything needs to be brought into the open, and this case, like so many others, must stop being heard in secret, dark back rooms where hardly anybody is allowed from the family concerned and outrageous orders and restrictions are turned into legal paraphernalia in which everybody suffers completely unjustly without remorse of any kind.
These are the basic facts of this outrageous case but so many more crimes and irregularities exist.

This is a true sworn statement and any further details can be given on request from adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk.
—————————————————————————-the Musa Videos:

The Bizarre “Interim Care Order” hearings, + 12 Jan hearing phone call to the Royal Courts of Justice:

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=10 … m=text_url

The Musa Interviews, April 2010, before the baby was removed:

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=f7 … m=text_url

###########################################################

30 10 2011 – Christopher Booker

Lord Justice Wall takes on an alarming child-snatching case

This seems to be a classic instance of the way social workers make a crashing initial mistake, then add ever more questionable allegations to defend their blunder.

A mother and her daughter have been fighting a care order Photo: ALAMY By Christopher Booker
7:00PM BST 29 Oct 2011
In the child-snatching story that I have reported on here most often, the latest twists are as disturbing as anything that has gone before. The case has been taken over by Lord Justice Wall, the President of the Family Division. It is a classic instance of how, when social workers seize children on the basis of what appears to be a crashing initial mistake, they then seem to make ever more questionable allegations against the parents to defend their original blunder.

On June 27, a year-old baby that had been torn from its mother’s arms at birth (but was later returned to the couple on a judge’s orders) developed a fever. When the parents took the baby to hospital for medical advice, the staff contacted social workers, who called in the police on an allegation that the parents had drugged the baby with opium. The parents were arrested and held in a police cell for 27 hours. The baby was taken back into care.

This month, I am told, the police announced that no charges would be brought against the couple, lab tests having shown no trace of any drugs. The social workers had apparently known this for weeks. Meanwhile, they asked the police to arrest the couple on a charge of conspiracy to abduct their other five children from foster homes and take them abroad. The parents had no idea where their children were, having not seen them for many months. Again, it seems, no charges are to be brought, because there was no evidence.

Despite an order by Lord Justice Wall that the parents must again be given regular contact with their children, his order has, I gather, been ignored. There is much in this alarming case for the learned judge to investigate.

For legal reasons, comments have been disabled on this story.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8857570/Lord-Justice-Wall-takes-on-an-alarming-child-snatching-case.html
—————————–
“Sunday Telegraph” reporter Christopher Bookers articles about the Musa family ordeal at the hands of Haringey council:

STILL NOTHING HAS BEEN HEARD ABOUT THIS MISSING GIRL AS OF 21.00 HRS GMT 9 11 2011 AFTER 15 MONTHS OF HER TELLING HER FATHER ON A CONTACT VISIT SHED BEEN SEXUALLY ABUSED BY A TEENAGE MEMBER OF THE FOSTER HOME SHE WAS PLACED WITH AFTER BEING REMOVED FROM HER PARENTS ON TOTALLY FALSE ALLEGATIONS {ALL DISPROVEN LATER} IN APRIL 2010.  EVEN HER NAME HAS BEEN CHANGED AND EVEN THE HIGH COMMISSIONER AND OTHER DIPLOMATS AT THE NIGERIAN HIGH COMMISSION, LONDON, HAVE BEEN REFUSED SEEING HER. MPS AND NUMEROUS AUTHORITY FIGURES HAVE BEEN TOLD – EVERYBODY HAS IGNORED EVERY PLEA, INCLUDING LOUGHTON, THE “CHILDRENS MINISTER”, AND PICKLES, THE SEC. OF STATE FOR COMMUNITIES.
I HAVE A QUESTION:
THESE MPS + MANY MORE ARE FULLY AWARE OF THIS SHOCKING CASE, AS I ALONE HAVE SENT SCORES OF MESSAGES IN GREAT DETAIL TO THEM ABOUT THIS CASE, BY RECORDED DELIVERY ROYAL MAIL ALSO – HOW COME THEYRE STILL ALLOWED TO BE MPS AND ARE PAID THEIR HIGH WAGES BY THE PUBLIC WHEN THEY REFUSE TO DO THEIR JOBS AND INVESTIGATE CORRUPTION WITHIN THE COUNCILS, POLICE AND JUDICIARY? IT IS AN OUTRIGHT DISGRACE. ALL OFFICIAL COMPLAINTS ARE IGNORED, AND THIS CASE HAS COST OVER A MILLION POUNDS OF THE TAXPAYERS MONEY SO FAR, WITH CORRUPT BARRISTERS LIKE HARINGEY COUNCILS MALCOLM CHISOLME ON RIDICULOUSLY HIGH   FEES. THEY MILK IT TO AN OBSCENE EXTREME.

SUNDAY 12 6 11:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8570173/The-mystery-of-Haringeys-missing-Girl-X-makes-a-mockery-of-the-Children-Act.html

The mystery of Haringey’s missing ‘Girl X’ makes a mockery of the Children Act
The family of a girl taken into care have not seen or heard from her for 10 months, writes Christopher Booker.

Torn apart: the system of child protection is a national scandal
7:00PM BST 11 Jun 2011
The social workers of Haringey are notorious for having failed to prevent the deaths of Baby P and Victoria Climbié. But in their zeal to avoid any repetition of these tragedies, they are now at the forefront of those councils which have pushed the number of children taken into care to an all-time high. In all the cases I have been following where children have been taken from their families for what seem like dubious reasons, no single instance has been more disturbing than the plight of a 10-year-old girl seized by Haringey last year, who seems in the past 10 months to have vanished off the radar.

“Girl X”, as I shall call her, was taken into care on the basis of three allegations. One turned out to be so laughably erroneous that it was soon dropped; a second was likewise dropped when medical tests completely disproved the council’ s claims. The third, highly questionable, has still not been put to any evidential test.

The last time Girl X was seen by her mother was at a supervised contact session last August. Having complained of sexual abuse by her foster carer’s 19-year-old son, she asked to be given, as a birthday present, a journal with a lock in which she could record her “secret thoughts”. Since that day she has not been seen by her parents or, since the autumn, by her siblings, who are also in care. It seems she has since been interviewed by three people – an independent social worker, an independent psychiatrist and her guardian, all of whom reported that she wished to see and be reunited with her mother.

No one representing the family has been allowed to see her, including the girl’s grandparents, who came from abroad specifically to visit her. Her parents have been forbidden to telephone her or even send a Christmas card. Her whereabouts are a mystery. When I put questions about her to Haringey last year, the council’s only response was to ask for a court order forbidding me to refer to the case at all. (It was not granted.)

What makes all this particularly disturbing is that, in several respects, it seems to defy the Children Act, which insists that councils must do all they can to encourage contact between children taken into care and their parents, who continue to share parental responsibility until a child is adopted. “The responsible authority,” says the Act, “has a duty to endeavour to promote contact” with the parents and “any relative, friend or other person connected to the child”. In particular, parents must be allowed to see medical or school reports relating to their child. The law also insists that, if children are old enough, they should be allowed to appear in court to express their wishes. None of these things has happened.

Related Articles
Industry begins to count the true cost of ‘climate change’
11 Jun 2011
Parents denied a voice in court against the child-snatchers
05 Mar 2011
The real scandal hidden by gags is what goes on in family courts
28 May 2011
How our judges deny human rights to children taken into care
04 Jun 2011

Why – when even Baby P’s mother was last year allowed out of prison to enjoy supervised contact with her surviving children – has Girl X been shut away as a silent prisoner, seemingly denied her rights? What has happened to Girl X?

For legal reasons, comments on this story have been disabled.
========================================
1} CHRISTOPHER BOOKERS SUNDAY TELEGRAPH ARTICLES CONDENSED relating to the M case {excerpts shown where applicable}
1} http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7870342/Forced-adoption-is-a-truly-dreadful-scandal.html 3 July 2010

PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION AND HELP STOP THE COVERUP OF WHATS HAPPENED TO 6 CHILDREN BY HARINGEY COUNCIL…THANK YOU!!

{copy + paste}:

http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/send-the-musa-family-back-home-to-nigeria-with-their.html

About butlincat

my blog: http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com http://www.youtube.com/butlincat http://www.twitter.com/butlincat
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.