TARGETTED INDIVIDUAL MAURICE J. KIRK – LETTER TO AUTHORITIES 1 MAR. 2012

From: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk
To: trevor.phillips@equalityhumanrights.com
CC: admin@number10.gov.uk; mayt@parliament.uk; lammyd@parliament.uk; ruffleyd@parliament.uk; lynne.featherstone.mp@parliament.uk; andersonda@parliament.uk; blunkettd@parliament.uk; camerond@parliament.uk; picklese@parliament.uk; pickles@communities.gsi.gov.uk; clarkek@parliament.uk; coopery@parliament.uk; president@whitehouse.gov; president@po.gov.za; press.int@aljazeera.net; emma.finch@parliament.uk; cleggn@parliament.uk; milibande@parliament.uk; haguew@parliament.uk; bellinghamh@parliament.uk; nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu  {bcc’d x 150}
Subject: THE CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST TARGETTED INDIVIDUAL MAURICE J. KIRK
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 20:18:47 +0000

 
Dear Sir,
 
The case of MAURICE JOHN KIRK is taking place at Cardiff Crown Court, Wales.  His human rights have been breached in that he is not allowed to question key witnesses – barred by the judge HUGHES. The witness he is not allowed to question is a high ranking doctor who has committed the criminal offence of FRAUD against Maurice Kirk, and if he is questioned by Kirk this could well be exposed even more. This trial is a farce and i urge you to see the crimes as committed by these courts who are acting criminally outside the law at Cardiff Crown Court. 
 
Todays calls from MAURICE KIRK calling from Cardiff prison today 1 March. The 2nd call was cut off by the prison after 64 secs.:
 
 
and his 2 calls from Thursday 29 Feb. from Cardiff prison explain even more irregularities
 
 
 
If you remember Article 6 of the ECHR states, regarding the questioning of witnesses:
 
“>>> Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights {E.C.H.R.}, specifically states: 
 
 Section B: The right to a fair trial –
part 1. Guarantees inherent in the notion of fair trial –
item 1. The adversarial nature of the procedure and the equality of arms.
 
Feldbrugge v. the Netherlands (29 May 1986, para.44) – violation of Article 6 (1); the applicant had not been given the opportunity to comment upon the report of a medical expert.
 
Bönisch v. Austria (6 May 1985, paras 33-35) – the parties must have the same possibility to call experts; when an ‘expert’ is dependant by the prosecution, he had to be considered as a witness for the prosecution rather than as an expert and the accused has to have the same opportunity to use such an expert otherwise the principle of equality of arms will be violated.” >>>
                      ”””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””’ 
Please see this article: https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2012/03/01/maurice-kirk-calls-x2-feb-29-from-cardiff-prison/  for the full article which has a transcript from an earlier hearing where it describes Kirk clearly being denied his basic human rights, here:  http://mauricejohnkirk.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/a20110290-kirk-proc-27-01-12.pdf                                   ””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””’

M Kirks sites describe more of the atrocities against this law abiding man: http://www.kirkflyingvet.com  +  http://www.mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com  + my site which has some articles, calls + updates  http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com
 
Thank you,

About butlincat

my blog: http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com http://www.youtube.com/butlincat http://www.twitter.com/butlincat
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.