Call from 8 March:

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=107baba0da555801e9adc83&skin_id=1703&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url from 6 March:

   http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=1075eac32e598b21dbaf54d&skin_id=1702&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

And please see this:

https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2012/03/01/maurice-kirk-calls-x2-feb-29-from-cardiff-prison/

As a representative of the people please see to it that PROPER JUSTICE is performed regarding MAURICE JOHN KIRK and stop these kangeroo courts controlled by these dark judges who are complicit in covering up monumental crimes against the State and its people!! 

M. Kirks sites are  http://www.kirkflyingvet.com  +  http://www.mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com  and my site with calls etc on from M Kirk is  http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com .The attatchments are a document pertaining to Mr. Kirk and a photo of Mr. Kirk at a hospital visit days after being beaten by prison warders at Cardiff prison during his unjust stay there last autumn before his present unjust incarceration.

Thank you for your time,

{sent to every MP + 250 media}
====================================
EXTRAORDINARY AND HIGHLY ILLEGAL TARGETTING AND VICTIMISATION OF MAURICE KIRK

Update 9 March – …the call from yesterday 8 March from Maurice Kirk in Cardiff prison tells of the highly illegal actions of the police in S Wales and other charletans there acting totally illegally in an effort to silence Maurice Kirk..s…

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=107baba0da555801e9adc83&skin_id=1703&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

…pls see his site http://www.kirkflyingvet.com  +  http://www.mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com

———————————————————–

CALL FROM MAURICE KIRK 6 MARCH, IN CARDIFF PRISON

TARGETTED INDIVIDUAL MAURICE KIRK CALL 6 MARCH  

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=1075eac32e598b21dbaf54d&skin_id=1702&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

…pls see his sites for more: http://www.kirkflyingvet.com +  http://www.mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com …b.

——————————————————————–

LATEST BOOKER ARTICLE “SUNDAY TELEGRAPH” 3 MARCH 2012=

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/9120754/We-already-have-unjust-secret-courts.html

“We already have unjust secret courts Behind a wall of secrecy, the family courts routinely turn all the familiar principles of justice upside down.

Dreyfus was convicted on the basis of evicence shown to the judge in secret Photo: ALAMY By Christopher Booker 7:00PM GMT 03 Mar 2012 There was outrage last week over government plans to extend the degree to which our courts can operate in secret. David Davis, former shadow home secretary, claimed that such “a regime of secret courts and hidden judgments”, where defendants could not even be “told the evidence against them”, were worthy only of “despotic one-party states such as Syria, Iran and North Korea”. A letter from 57 of the 69 lawyers already familiar with such practices, from their work on terrorist cases, protested that extending this system would “represent a departure from the foundational principles of natural justice that all parties are allowed to see and challenge all the evidence relied on before the court”.

However shocking this may sound, though, it is already the system which operates in our family courts. Behind a wall of secrecy, they routinely turn all the familiar principles of justice upside down in just this way. Among the dozens of cases I have reported where children are removed from their parents, often for what appear the most absurd reasons, I have been astonished to hear how judges accept extraordinary claims by social workers and lawyers without allowing the parents to challenge them. Hearsay evidence is accepted in a way that would never be allowed in a normal court, and parents are condemned on evidence they are not allowed to see.

One such case I compared recently to the Dreyfus affair – which turned on evidence supplied to his judges but withheld from him. Yet in our family courts such travesties of justice are commonplace. I shall return to this particular case in a future column. I must add an update, however, on the case I reported last week, where a mother faced imprisonment because her teenage children, two of them in care, had been communicating on Facebook. On Monday, the judge decided to adjourn the hearing for two months. I can say no more –thanks to that secrecy which conceals abuses of justice just as shocking as anything David Davis and others protested about so eloquently last week.

Comments on this story are disabled for legal reasons.”

===================================================================== 29 10 2011 – Christopher Booker – MUSA

Lord Justice Wall takes on an alarming child-snatching case

This seems to be a classic instance of the way social workers make a crashing initial mistake, then add ever more questionable allegations to defend their blunder.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8857570/Lord-Justice-Wall-takes-on-an-alarming-child-snatching-case.html

————————————————————–

“Sunday Telegraph” reporter Christopher Bookers articles about the Musa family ordeal at the hands of Haringey council:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8570173/The-mystery-of-Haringeys-missing-Girl-X-makes-a-mockery-of-the-Children-Act.html

The mystery of Haringey’s missing ‘Girl X’ makes a mockery of the Children Act The family of a girl taken into care have not seen or heard from her for 10 months, writes Christopher Booker.

Torn apart: the system of child protection is a national scandal 7:00PM BST 11 Jun 2011 ====================================== http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7870342/Forced-adoption-is-a-truly-dreadful-scandal.html 3 July 2010 My last case is so shocking that I will return to it in more detail at a later date. It centres on a London couple who, earlier this year, had their six children seized by social workers on what appears to be flimsy hearsay evidence (I have seen the court papers). The mother was pregnant again. Last month, after the boy was born, three social workers and five policemen entered the hospital ward where she was breastfeeding at 3am, wresting the baby from her by force. They then discovered that they had nowhere to keep him. The boy was put into intensive care, where his mother was taken to breastfeed him for four days, until she was fit to leave the hospital. She saw her baby for the last time two weeks ago. I will return to this story when I have had some explanation from the council responsible.

================================== http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7896592/Its-time-to-bring-family-law-to-book.html 17 7 2010

========================================================

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7946155/Forced-adoption-social-workers-surreal-investigation-recalls-satanic-abuse-scandals.html 14 Aug 2010 This entire article is about the musa family. ” By Christopher Booker 6:39PM BST 17 Jul 2010 107 Comments I have never, in all my years as a journalist, felt so frustrated as I do over two deeply disturbing stories of apparent injustice that cry out to be reported but which, for legal reasons, I can refer to only in the vaguest terms. To cover them as they deserve, and as the victims so desperately wish, would challenge a part of our legal system shrouded in an almost impenetrable veil of secrecy. ======================================================================

D} http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8098952/Child-protection-MPs-must-act-on-the-scandal-of-seized-children.html 30 Oct 2010 This is a very general article – not specifically about the M family, but give an idea of what they are going through.

==================================================

E} http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7946155/Forced-adoption-social-workers-surreal-investigation-recalls-satanic-abuse-scandals.html 14 8 2010 There could have been few more bizarre meetings anywhere in Britain last week than that between a married mother and the social workers who had taken her six young children to place them unhappily in foster care. The officials, of a council I cannot name, are fixated with the idea that this respectable Christian is a “sex worker”, whose children all have different fathers and who is engaged in “child trafficking”.

many more articles on the MUSA case by C Booker…b.

———————————————————————

FROM NORMAN SCARTH TODAY 3 MARCH

From: enscarth@hotmail.com To: stan.parr@btinternet.com CC: harriett.baldwin.mp@parliament.uk; mikenattrass@hotmail.com; nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu; robin.walker.mp@parliament.uk; mayt@parliament.uk Subject: ‘In full consultation with WHO?????? Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 19:13:32 +0000

“E.P.P. will overhaul the Judiciary, in full consultation with them” ?!?!?!?!  In full consultation with WHO?????   The Judicial Mafia are THE BIGGEST CROOKS OF ALL!!!  Why do you think that at the age of 86 I had to flee the land of my birth, the land for which I fought in World War II, the land in which I worked honestly & hard for 70 years, harder than eversince I set out to expose that very same Judicial Mafia?

Norman Scarth

---

From: stan.parr@btinternet.com CC: harriett.baldwin.mp@parliament.uk; mikenattrass@hotmail.com; nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu; robin.walker.mp@parliament.uk; mayt@parliament.uk To: ;@smtp822.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Subject: ENGLAND TODAY! – Lead stolen off Hinckley Parish Church roof! – Daily Mail Sat 3rd Mar/12 Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 17:42:17 +0000

Politics List    (Plus local MPs)

So how is your blood pressure? – Read this…….

We are the laughing stock of the world – and those in Westminster do NOTHING to stop it! WHY NOT?

The Comments at the bottom reflect a similar public view! One says:-

“Judges should be elected. That way, if they let off a load of thieves, they can be un-elected.” – Paul, here and there, 03/3/2012

Interesting he says this – See our EPP Manifesto on Law & Order and Home Affairs, we say, among other things:

All Public Service Heads, including Chief Constables, Judges, Fire Chiefs and Health Chiefs, will be elected on a 4-year tenure of office. This may guarantee a more ‘focused’ Establishment, sensitive to public opinion.

Non-English Citizens, who are found guilty of committing a crime, will be deported to their country of origin, together with all family and dependent relatives.

E.P.P. will overhaul the Judiciary, in full consultation with them, in order to revise completely the present punishment system. This is currently seen by most people as slightly “out of touch”, and a serious attempt will be made to properly and accurately make “the punishment fit the crime”.

Sentences, and Magistrate’s Sentencing Guidelines, should be overhauled completely. There are many anomalies in the current guidelines, which are lax, inadequate and ambiguous.

Our website is currently under revision, but much more can be found on : http://www.eppweb.com/

======================================================================================

Fury as Romanians who stole £50,000 church lead escape prison sentences

By Daily Mail Reporter

Last updated at 12:57 AM on 3rd March 2012

When the parishioners of St Mary’s saw the state of their 13th century church after thieves tore lead worth £50,000 from the roof they tried to be forgiving.

But it seems even the most lenient-minded couldn’t match the mercy shown by magistrates – who let the culprits off with a 12-month community order.

Romanians Florin Stan, 24, Vergil Stan, 51, and Nicolae Birsan, 26, broke through the church’s main gates on two consecutive nights last month, helping themselves to a huge amount of lead.

Target: St Mary’s Parish Church in Hinckley was targeted by a group of thieves who stole lead from the roof on two consecutive days

Thanks to CCTV and the vigilance of the churchwarden and police, they were arrested the next day.

All admitted theft when they appeared before magistrates in Hinckley, Leicestershire.

More…

• Guilty! The Bad Samaritans who stole from Malaysian student with broken jaw during London riots

As well as walking away with  12-month community orders, they were told to carry out 55 hours of unpaid work.

And after  hearing that the trio, all from Birmingham, had ‘no means’, the magistrates made no order for them to contribute towards the prosecution costs.

The lead taken from the church of St Mary in Hinckley has not been recovered.

‘Utterly dismayed’: Hinkley councillor David Bill could not believe the thieves were not jailed following their court appearance

Last night there was anger in the community and claims that the lenient sentences would encourage others to take their chances and steal from churches.

David Bill, a local councillor and member of Leicestershire Police Authority, said he was ‘utterly dismayed’ that the chance to impose a tougher sentence had been lost.

‘This sentence is terrible because we rarely catch this type of criminal,’ he said.

‘Here we did manage to arrest three who admitted damaging a beautiful church and the magistrates have missed a rare opportunity to send out a clear message that this type of crime will not be tolerated.

It was as a result of the dedicated work of the churchwarden, the CCTV operator and the local police that the three criminals concerned were caught.

‘Metal thefts have been on the increase in this area for some time with 28 such incidents reported to the police this year alone.

‘I would have thought that having had such a success in catching these people, this would have been the time and place to make an example. I am appalled at what subsequently happened.’

He has invited magistrates who heard the case to meet with  members of a community safety group to explain the sentencing.

The vicar of St Mary’s, the Rev John Whittaker, was also dismayed at the sentence.

‘It’s a real shame,’ he said. ‘The police did a great job and achieved a good arrest which followed evidence and it feels disappointing that the extent of the crime doesn’t seem to be reflected in the sentences.

‘The sentence on these men seems disproportionately low.

‘To me, it sends out the message to metal thieves to keep on stealing from our churches because if you are caught you will be treated in one of the most lenient ways possible.

Community orders: The trio of thieves dodged jail terms following their hearings at Hinkley Magistrates court

‘We are now having to ask the people of Hinckley to dig deep for thousands of pounds to repair the church roof. It is money that could have been spent on the young and needy.’

The church, along with its community centre, has reported 16 lead thefts in the past 18 months.

Mr Whittaker has appealed for donations to help raise the £50,000 needed to repair the roof. He said it probably would be rebuilt with fibreglass.

The Government is trying to tackle the problem by removing the licences of any dealers found to have handled stolen metal

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2109579/Fury-Romanians-stole-50-000-church-lead-escape-prison-sentences.html#ixzz1o65ve5Dy

Comments:

“billMar 4, 11:37 pm

was not stan parr the chief constable of blackpool a while back and got sacked bill ”

——————————————————————-

TARGETTED INDIVIDUAL MAURICE J. KIRK – LETTER TO AUTHORITIES 1 MAR. 2012

From: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk To: trevor.phillips@equalityhumanrights.com CC: admin@number10.gov.uk; mayt@parliament.uk; lammyd@parliament.uk; ruffleyd@parliament.uk; lynne.featherstone.mp@parliament.uk; andersonda@parliament.uk; blunkettd@parliament.uk; camerond@parliament.uk; picklese@parliament.uk; pickles@communities.gsi.gov.uk; clarkek@parliament.uk; coopery@parliament.uk; president@whitehouse.gov; president@po.gov.za; press.int@aljazeera.net; emma.finch@parliament.uk; cleggn@parliament.uk; milibande@parliament.uk; haguew@parliament.uk; bellinghamh@parliament.uk; nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu  {bcc’d x 150}

Subject: THE CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST TARGETTED INDIVIDUAL MAURICE J. KIRK

Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 20:18:47 +0000

Dear Sir,   The case of MAURICE JOHN KIRK is taking place at Cardiff Crown Court, Wales.  His human rights have been breached in that he is not allowed to question key witnesses – barred by the judge HUGHES. The witness he is not allowed to question is a high ranking doctor who has committed the criminal offence of FRAUD against Maurice Kirk, and if he is questioned by Kirk this could well be exposed even more. This trial is a farce and i urge you to see the crimes as committed by these courts who are acting criminally outside the law at Cardiff Crown Court.

Todays calls from MAURICE KIRK calling from Cardiff prison today 1 March. The 2nd call was cut off by the prison after 64 secs.:

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=106e0d2f92ee8c2dd18fda9&skin_id=1702&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

and his 2 calls from Thursday 29 Feb. from Cardiff prison explain even more irregularities

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=106c1f5191e0b5529c68074&skin_id=1602&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

If you remember Article 6 of the ECHR states, regarding the questioning of witnesses:   “>>> Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights {E.C.H.R.}, specifically states:     Section B: The right to a fair trial – part 1. Guarantees inherent in the notion of fair trial – item 1. The adversarial nature of the procedure and the equality of arms.   Feldbrugge v. the Netherlands (29 May 1986, para.44) – violation of Article 6 (1); the applicant had not been given the opportunity to comment upon the report of a medical expert.   Bönisch v. Austria (6 May 1985, paras 33-35) – the parties must have the same possibility to call experts; when an ‘expert’ is dependant by the prosecution, he had to be considered as a witness for the prosecution rather than as an expert and the accused has to have the same opportunity to use such an expert otherwise the principle of equality of arms will be violated.” >>>                        ”””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””’

Please see this article: https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2012/03/01/maurice-kirk-calls-x2-feb-29-from-cardiff-prison/  for the full article which has a transcript from an earlier hearing where it describes Kirk clearly being denied his basic human rights, here:  http://mauricejohnkirk.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/a20110290-kirk-proc-27-01-12.pdf                                   ””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””’

M Kirks sites describe more of the atrocities against this law abiding man: http://www.kirkflyingvet.com  +  http://www.mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com  + my site which has some articles, calls + updates  http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com   Thank you,

——————————————————————–

MAURICE KIRK CALLS x2 FEB. 29 – FROM CARDIFF PRISON

Maurice is in Cardiff prison on remand for breaking a restraining order he knew nothing about. It is believed it was issued after his arrest. The irregularities are phenomenal in Kirks court cases. He is in court tomorrow and who knows what will go on…his 2 calls from today the Thursday 29 Feb. from Cardiff prison:

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=106c1f5191e0b5529c68074&skin_id=1602&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

Here is the recent transcript

http://mauricejohnkirk.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/a20110290-kirk-proc-27-01-12.pdf

{from Kirks site http://www.kirkflyingvet.com}  where Maurice Kirk is denied his rights to cross-examine witnesses who are offering evidence against him – he is refused by some flimsy excuse by this judge, completely contravening Article 6 of his Human Rights .  >>> Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights {E.C.H.R.}, specifically states:

Section B: The right to a fair trial – part 1. Guarantees inherent in the notion of fair trial – item 1. The adversarial nature of the procedure and the equality of arms.

Feldbrugge v. the Netherlands (29 May 1986, para.44) – violation of Article 6 (1); the applicant had not been given the opportunity to comment upon the report of a medical expert.

Bönisch v. Austria (6 May 1985, paras 33-35) – the parties must have the same possibility to call experts; when an ‘expert’ is dependant by the prosecution, he had to be considered as a witness for the prosecution rather than as an expert and the accused has to have the same opportunity to use such an expert otherwise the principle of equality of arms will be violated.” >>>

Below some explanatory papers sent by Kirk outlining some of his rights disallowed: