It has been reported to ths supporter of the MUSA case  that GLORIA MUSA has now been returned to the hospital wing of Holloway prison, after having spent the previous few days handcuffed to her bed at Whittington hospital, where she had to return due medical problems induced by both her baby’s birth and the build-up of stress caused by nearly 2 years of mental torture brought on by the removal of her 6 – sorry 7 children now under totally false pretences. Gloria Musa gave birth last Friday evening {9 Feb.} to a boy in her prison cell at Holloway prison.
 Gloria had some kind of fit before passing out before giving birth in her prison cell, and after giving birth, but was later returned to Holloway prison to a segregated location there, then taken back to the hospital, then returned to Holloway, where she is now..
 The baby’s name is thought to be the equivalent of the English word “Victor”.
Needless to say the authorities have removed the baby from Gloria until who knows when and will probably become the subject of another endless court case which will cause even more distress to the loving parents Chiwar and Gloria.
It is outrageous and every MP and countless authority figures have been told about this shocking case, especially the sexual abuse suffered by Favor Musa, then 9 years old, whilst placed in a foster home in Erith, Kent yet not one notified has made any effort to correct any of the crimes and any of the multitude of irregularities that have beset this family by notorious government employees or those connected. Favour has now not been seen for over 19 months by her parents, the other children for over 7 months, and the baby Queen Elizabeth has not been seen by her parents since June 28th, when she was removed.
The case at the family court continues, as does the criminal case also. Bail was refused for the Musa parents also on the most flimsiest of reasons on the other day at the criminal court.
One thing I was told the other day was that Abraham Musa, the 7 year old, had run away no less than 3 times from the people he was placed with whilst in “care”. This makes me so sad. Councils put publishing injunctions on cases using the excuse “may incite unrest or riot” and things of that nature. What about when a child is removed via untrue allegations and a whole lot of other untruths are manufactured when its realised the original allegations made are untrue, and eventually the entire case is based on untruths? Isnt the real reason for the injunction’s silencing –  to keep the irregularities from scrutiny of any kind?  Why should a 7 year old’s running away from where he was because he simply is so unhappy about everything and he simply wants to get back with him mum and dad be kept from people when the case, as I have already said, was based on untrue allegations? Knowing about Abrahams plight doesnt make me want to riot or anything like that – it just makes me so very very sad that this child has to go through what hes having to go through and that certain people are hurting these children so much, Abrahams situation being a typical example, and these people are prepared to do anything to keep things wrapped up tight – and secret.”
That was an opinion by butlincat. Photos from the original post have been removed for legal reasons.

What follows is another opinion by butlincat, based on an intense study of this case »


On the 8 April 2010 8 policemen let themselves in by key to the Musa family home in Haringey North London and removed the Musa’s 5 children without any notice or prearrangement. The children were removed on what later were found to be totally untrue allegations made by certain employees at Haringey council. All allegations have been disproven, the allegations ranging from the children not being the Musas offspring and were being trafficked, to the children being beaten and generally mistreated by their parents. Regarding the child trafficking allegation that the children were not the Musas offspring and they were in fact part of a child trafficking network, DNA tests instigated by the Musa parents, and taking a phenominally long 5 months to undertake and reach a viable result proved without a shadow of a doubt that the children were indeed the Musas children, and the children were in no way being trafficked in any shape or form. After this allegation was disproved other equally ridiculous allegations were made to keep the children from returning to their once happy home. One such allegation that was made was that Gloria Musa was an active sex worker – a prostitute – who plied her trade in front of her church congregation and also in front of her children. She is, in fact. an ordained bishop in the Evangelical Church of Africa and is not and has never been what this allegation alleges. This ridiculous allegation was made with no evidence of any kind to substantiate it yet the court believed this nonsense, along with other unsubstantiated allegations such as the children being beaten by the parents, even though medical examinations made when the council took the children showed no sign of anything to back their allegations of cruelty by the parents towards their children. Even though the allegations were proven groundless never was it mentioned that the children were to be returned to their parents as they should have been, of course. Quite the opposite in fact took place in that a 6th child was removed from the Musa parents, the hitherto unborn baby at the time of the April 8 2010 child removals. The baby Queen Elizabeth was stolen once at her birth, the violence of the police during the removal operation in the hospital at 3 in the morning directly after Gloria the mother had just given birth nearly killing this defenceless mother. The baby was returned later after a matter of weeks, but was stolen again on even more dubious allegations on June 28th 2011, and the parents have not seen the baby since that date. The baby’s removal, like the entire case, needs a thorough investigation far away from the entities within this area of London who are dealing with vulnerable defenceless children, and their parents. During the time the children were removed the eldest, now 11 year old Favour Musa, complained of being “inappropriatly touched” – sexually molested in other words – by the teenage habitee of the foster home she was placed in. Ever since this child complained of this appalling sexual harrassment, over 18 months ago, she has not been seen by any family member or anybody from the Nigerian High Commission – some of whom are actually Godparents to certain Musa children. It is not known whether Favour Musa is alive or dead, or is even in this country as the council refuse to say anything about the child when the parents enquire after her. She has simply vanished.There is very much a £1000 reward been offered by an anonymous donor for her giving her testimony on video. The council and their cronies have also supposedly changed Favours name to “Lizzie”. This article on “Parent Alienation Syndrome” shows how changing a childs name,location and lifestyle can turn her away from her loving parents and all she knew before her removal and the subtle changes introduced: – . Although commonly used in divorce cases it can of course be used to alienate parents after the child is moved into a foster home. Recently on the 28th June 2011 the Musas took their baby to St. Thomas’s hospital, London as they thought she seemed to have a fever – a temperature. This was enough for Haringey council to arrange for the police to remove the baby, claiming it had been administered hard drugs, even though tests taken by medical staff at the hospital at the time proved negative for all drugs in not only the baby but also in both parents. Nevertheless an Emergency Protection Order {EPO} was placed on the baby immediatly and she has been removed from the Musa family, even though the reasons for the baby’s removal are totally fictional. At a court hearng on the 7th July the judge, who happened to be the original judge who ordered the removal of the other 5 children, believing the Haringey councils allegations, confirmed he would be issuing an Interim Care Order {ICO} on the newly taken baby, thus effectively removing her from the parents care, when a 2 week period was up. This he duly did, and the baby Elizabeth has not now been seen since 28th June, some 8 months ago from the date of her removal. For no contact visits to be allowed during this period is totally illegal, against all orders the court has made regarding the childrens contact visits with their parents, against the “Childrens Act” and against the parents and baby’s Human Rights.

Allegation by the council, in the early stages of this case, were that Gloria Musa was given opium by her stepfather whilst in the UK as a teenager. These are complete lies, yet were part and parcel of the allegations used to remove and keep these childrenis completely untrue. Gloria Musa has no stepfather, has never taken opium at any time, and was not in the UK as a teenager. This is just one totally false allegation fabricated by the council and used in the removal of the Musa children. It has been said by the president of the secret closed family courts that “professionals dont lie”. This in itself is an outrageous lie which should be ignored completely always. There is overwhelming evidence of lies being told in this Musa case let alone numerous other now famous caes of child removal in the UK such as the cases of Vicki Haigh, Maureen Spalek, Cheryl Stannard, Eve Pears, the Baylis family and others Many other irregularities and anomalies exist in this outrageous case, from outright witness intimidation at least 5 people familiar to the Musa parents to police conducting raids with no warrant or legal documentation whatsoever and without the necassary witnesses required by British law. The court orders concerning contact visits with the children have not been adhered to by the agency responsible for them on scores of occasions, and nothing is ever done about this, causing much unneccassary grief, worry and financial hardship to these parents who have been targetted by Haringey council employees and those connected to it. Supporters have written hundreds of emails and many letters sent by postal recorded delivery to MPs and other so-called “authority figures” {such as police and a Chief Constable} all of which have been totally ignored, have made each and every person told absolutely aware of so many irregularities an and crimes committed in this appalling case and who exactly has undertaken what is described. Even so nothing is ever done about anything by anybody clearly and concisely told about the unacceptable events, even when trying to inform them of a 9 year old girl {at the time} being sexually molested by a teenager she was sadly placed at the home of. The Musa parents were remanded in prison on the 31 November and are still there awaiting trial, which began on 1 Febuary but adjourned yet again until the 29th Febuary because the prosecution legal types hadnt done the necessary work which would allow the case to begin. The cover-up is extreme in this case, with the usual unacceptable court injunctions on its reporting publicly in place. What has gone on is disgraceful and everything needs to be brought into the open, and this case, like so many others, must stop being heard in secret, dark back rooms where hardly anybody is allowed from the family concerned and outrageous orders and restrictions are turned into legal paraphernalia in which everybody suffers completely unjustly without remorse of any kind. These are the basic facts of this outrageous case but so many more crimes and irregularities exist.

This is a true sworn statement and I contend a factual opinion of what has taken place and any further details can be given on request from me John Graham

About butlincat

my butlincats blog: [2 a/cs : pink cat logo is main a/c, winking cat logo is secondary] linkedin -
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.