Mr Justice Beatson revives ‘Vexatious Litigant’ Registration
But I wasn’t there was I?
The judgment of today’s JR hearing, written some weeks ago, had not allowed for my absence due to ill health.
But who cares?
Three things you can rely on here in Wales. They are taxes, death and widespread deceit throughout Cardiff’s judiciary, while they fight for their independence away from any interference from Whitehall.
But not too quick, chaps, not before they can persuade that same HM Treasury Solicitor’s vast legal team in Whitehall that, between 2003 to 2008, slaved tirelessly when last trying to have me registered as a Vexatious Litigant over RCVS and South Police bullying. http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/legal/HM-Treasury-Solicitors-Office.aspx
Yesterday the usual attempts were made to ridicule a GP’s medical certificate, I had handed in at the court door but that is what happens when their own rogue doctor is allowed to say I am ‘mad’, with irreversible, probably, ‘significant brain damage’ and a possible brain tumour and get away with it! 09 09 01radiologist scans report.pdf
Their very own forensic psychiatrist was to suite their collapsing ‘machine gun’ trial, the latest in string of false imprisonments. Reliant on a widespread Welsh judicial conspiracy, which even meant using MAPPA and England’s FTAC, as they did, was bound to fail, but now, again, compounding an ordinary GP’s work, someone just trying to do her job.
Remember, Cowbridge Health Centre, my registered practice for nearly 18 years, dropped me like a ‘hot potato’ as soon as I won the ‘machine gun’ Caswell Clinic fiasco and walked free from the abuse of the Mental Health Act.
Remember, my Ravenscroft, Barry medical practice, very soon after, also dropped me like a ‘hot potato’ as soon as they produced a medical report, deliberately withheld by the Cardiff Magistrates, from the then 2nd Nov 10 presiding judge, for the ‘relatively minor incident, as District Judge Charles called it. Charles confirmed he knew of my being pushed down a flight of stairs by a bully boy ex-police officer, to finish up in Casualty with a broken leg but was the judge to prevent my cross examining, on medical grounds, any prosecution witnesses leaving it to another to adjudicate upon.
District Judge John Charles, “wash your mouth out, Maurice”, even said the penalty for my common assault conviction carries ‘no order’ frantic, of course, I did not appeal it as it was heard in my absence, with no cross examination whatsoever. Yes, you guessed it, the GP’s report in 2010, as with yesterday, was also ridiculed.
So when this NHS (Wales) GP writes that I need a brain scan with legitimate reasons, whatever judges, frilly nickered or not, may wish to say or do, behind the scenes, they are simply stuffed.
‘Stuffed’, I hasten to add, only in the minds of those who were brought up in believing in ‘the rule of law’. Presiding judges should damn well know better than to allow pathetic Principality politics, harbouring to my paedophiles, to be allowed to dominate just for the protection of further criminals amongst their chosen.
So what just did The Honourable Mr Justice Beatson have to say relevant to Article 6?
His first duty was to consider the content of this police commisioned and Crown Court used medical report now with my GP pending another brain scan….
Reliable witnesses, yet to confirm my accuracy in this preliminary account, sat in court only to hear the continuing Welsh judiciary, MAPPA and HM Prison Cardiff and NHS (Wales) cover up over a rogue NHS (Wales) doctor backed by a Swansea Professor who also falsified medical reports. Why? Just to get an IPP on an Englishman having failed in getting him shot. The crime, pray? For 20 years of questioning Cardiff courts’ inherent conduct, clearly only answerable to cyberspace.
This was an oral Judicial Review Application CO/3970/2012 from apparent failures in both Nov/Dec 11 Cardiff Magistrates and 1st/ 2nd March 2012 Crown Court hearings concerning allegations of harassment of a NHS (Wales) level 12 consultant forensic psychiatrist who had knowingly falsified the victim’s medical records for cash.
Mr Justice Beatson said there was ‘no challenge’ in law to the fact, in both sets of court proceedings, I was:
- 1. refused any of my legal papers from my prison cell, exactly as in the Jan/Feb 2010 ‘machine gun jury trial’ fiasco
- 2. refused any of my legal papers from my private solicitor especially collected and delivered to court by so many frustrated helpers, exactly as in the ‘machine gun’ trial
- 3. refused the right to cross examine any prosecution witnesses not even the investigating police officer, exactly as in the ‘machine gun trial’ when allowed only six questions
A currently useless photo of a disgusting example of our current Welsh judiciary , a Paul Thomas QC , who should never have allowed that 2010 ‘machine gun’ jury trial ever to have even got off the ground,,,,,,,but how much in back handers did he make?
- 4. appointed a lawyer, against my wishes, given no defence instructions or any idea of the defence’s case (the reasonable right to detect and prevent further criminal conduct etc)
- 5. appointed a lawyer who refused to challenge prosecution evidence including that of the unqualified doctor, the complainant, who had contradicted the diagnosis from doctors who carried out the series of brain scans
- 6. refused my right to call defence witnesses, the above doctors, for example or even to be allowed to interview, as eye witnesses or obtain police personal note books including those from the seven police officers who had concluded, at many of the incidents, no crime was likely to be committed should there be further distribution of ‘Wanted’ posters.
His Lordship went on to say, I am told, he was notifying the next JR judge, about to deliberate over His Honour Judge Hughes QC, of the March 12 Harassment appeal, should be made to ‘state a case’ concerning the above.
An extract example, from 1st March 12 Transcript, sent to court on 18th June but apparently withheld from Mr Justice Beatson
5C indicates the false psychiatric report in linked JR CO/3970/2012
7A, B, E Defendant refused any of his legal papers in court
8A promised witnesses but later refused Dr Gaynor Jones etc in rebuttal to false psychiatric reports so seriously affecting the Applicant’s private life
9F same court appointed lawyer, as in magistrates, again refused to challenge by cross examine the main prosecution witnesses on the issues relevant to the Applicant’s innocence or guilt.
10A this lawyer had no idea of defences as he had not been instructed and specifically asked not to act on his behalf with Defendant then expelled from court for no valid reason
11A Defendant NEVER told of invitation to return to court
12F ‘poster’ exhibit switched from the different ‘poster’used on same witness at magistrates
55A extract from false medical report read out not on the poster used at magistrates
62E Complaint that this appeal ‘leap frogged’ an outstanding appeal from 2nd November 2010,‘common assault’, destined to be heard outside Wales, to safeguard court officials as witnesses but all knowing the Appeal Court judge else were would scrap any restrictions by the YJCE Act.
66B prosecution switch poster
67E REPEAT requests refused to get all of the Defendant’s legal papers and exhibits off the custody staff and interview potential witnesses over lunch break
69C defence relied on section (3) (a) and (c) of Harassment Act not allowed to give evidence on it and mental state of prisoner considered unfit due to medical reports and prison records , as of that time
76D& 2nd March 8F transcript of Defendant’s cut short evidence riddled with too many examples to list
2nd March 12 HHJ Hughes QC transcript too large so on downloads section
2. Further enquiry, since the Applicant was released from Cardiff prison over this latest conspiracy, indicates there are a significant number of other victims in South Wales with similar accounts to tell, explaining just why this doctor continues to enjoy immunity as an ‘absolute witness’, an expression to be milked, no doubt, in Cardiff, in the next few years, during judicial melt down when he need only to be ‘cross examined’ by HM Partnership’s Cardiff court very own appointed lawyer!
3. Enclosed are few extracts and copy from a few other JR Applications (Sections 14 and 15) all conceived in South Wales’ unique environment. They all relate to this ‘absolute witness’ a forensic psychiatrist for the South Wales Police and who, all alone, recommended and obtained the protracted incarceration of Maurice John Kirk under Section 35 of 1983 Mental Health Act.
This list is far from being exhaustive.
Nothing was said in court, because I wasn’t there, about the RCJ already having notified this judge, by their 19thJuly letter, adjourn to join with this application the pending ‘state a case’ and time for me to find a lawyer.
Oh no, of course not, just like my 23rd April High Court hearing, while I was in prison, Civil damages 20 year running damages claim, ‘striking out’ the police prosecution incidents where numerous Cardiff court officials had been caught falsifying, again, court records.
Cardiff court judge and /or staff truly excelled themselves, yesterday, in saying ‘no application’ had been made for an adjournment…..bloody liar(s).
My helpers came out of the Cardiff Civil Justice building to demonstrating ‘Rick on the Roof’ and me, to say my case would be dismissed, as I should have notified the court earlier for an adjournment with my suggestion and application that it was only common sense to consolidate both JRs as ‘state a case’ in the Crown Court appeal was a similar but very different argument in law. The Court management continued their 20 year campaign to distort the facts and withhold vital sent in documents to RCJ visiting judges
The judge had to adjourn for 30 minutes for another matter. Quick as a flash I was on the phone paying a court fee of £80 for another application while the blank application form was being tricked out of them for me to fill in. One of my portly but able ‘runners’ then alighted the court steps, again, at break neck speed , with form filled in and with much aplomb served the papers on the disreputable organisation.
Within a mere few nanoseconds, it seemed, a smart young but somewhat embarrassed court official came panting out on to the pavement, grasping in his hand , ‘Chamberlain style’, a piece of paper.
It was the sealed/stamped court record of my latest application to consolidate this current episode of Cardiff Cabal skulduggery.
“Your case has been dismissed and I have been sent down by the court to reimburse the court fee”, he said, as I quietly logged the time he spoke on the back of my hand.
I looked at the piece of paper, my hurriedly filled-in application of seven minutes earlier and made off with it to ’have it out’ with the judge …..a bloody nose did cross my mind. But I was considered too unwell to enter court by those present, as did my GP, so, in the lift, returned the form to the clerk remonstrating I was not allowed it, on the promise I had a copy. An unlikely chance but we had plenty of witnesses.
No, of course the case had not yet been dismissed, it was just bluff, the judge was not aware? Had this judge ever been told of the first application let alone the second?
‘HM Partnership’ has once again come to their rescue. I continue to be banned from the building, except for court cases and soon that won’t happen when I am registered a Vexatious Litigant!
After a convivial lunch with the K-Team, my helpers hear the case, without me, culminating in the judge’s promise to block the outstanding ‘state a case’ JR or any others in the pipe line.
One might get the impression this particular judge was trying to tell me something or are they all, together, just getting rather itching feet about their respective pensions realising that once cyberspace really takes a hold and fully exposes their day by day behaviour it will be showing the tax payer just what really is going in our South Wales law courts.
There leaves, of course, the small matter of the outstanding 12 03 30 Application for Case Stated .txt , to be heard shortly by yet another frilly nickered judge wheeled in to protect the gravy train.
He or she may well agree with me that this remaining, deliberately aimed at the heart of the principles upon which British justice is based, JR Application, may look a little incongruous amongst what I have just witnessed in South Wales these past twenty years but who around here any more cares?http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2012/07/25/mr-justice-beatson-regurgitates-vexatious-litigant-registration.aspx
About Maurice Kirk
Maurice was born 12th March1945, a war baby, in Taunton, Somerset, West of England, within a final family of four brothers and one sister while mother and father were working 24/7 to run a country veterinary practice. Country pursuits very much dominated his spare time from most sports with his passion still for hunting , shooting and fishing! Maurice is currently trying to fly to South Africa in his WW2 Piper Cub,registration G-KURK. His other D-Day Cub, G-KERK, is destined, on skis, for a rather taller mountain after his promise to Sir Edmond, six years ago. Meanwhile, the task of obtaining justice in the UK courts, in order to practice veterinary surgery, is proving to be somewhat elusive.Authority has quite another agenda. Recent Posts
- Mr Justice Beatson revives ‘Vexatious Litigant’ Registration
- Another Farcical Day in a Deceitful Welsh Court Looking for my Guns
- Know a Rogue Doctor? £10,000 Reward for Witnesses make it £20,000
- Cardiff’s Judicial Cabal Caught Conspiring Playing the Race Card
- Will IPCC Investigate South Wales Police Conduct?
- July 2012 (8 )
- June 2012 (2 )
- May 2012 (8 )
- April 2012 (5 )
- March 2012 (5 )
- February 2012 (4 )
- January 2012 (1 )
- December 2011 (2 )
- November 2011 (12 )
- October 2011 (8 )
- September 2011 (11 )
- June 2011 (2 )
- May 2011 (1 )
- April 2011 (1 )
- December 2010 (3 )
- November 2010 (10 )
- October 2010 (11 )
- September 2010 (17 )
- April 2010 (2 )
- March 2010 (1 )
- February 2010 (1 )
- January 2010 (9 )
- December 2009 (2 )
- November 2009 (4 )
- June 2009 (1 )
- May 2009 (4 )
- April 2009 (3 )
- February 2009 (1 )
- January 2009 (4 )