JAMES TOOD – THE BORING QUILL GAZETTE – 30 SEPT. 2013
On 9 October 2013 18:01, James Todd wrote:
1brEDGAZ46 YAWN Monday 30 September 2013
THE BORING QUILL GAZETTE – 46
Preamble: Forget the intricacies of the politicians. Avoid the
National lottery, don’t take up the offer of assistance in buying a
home, seek a reduction in the price of fuel and gas and electricity
and water. Push for assisted passage and resettlement grants for
thosewho wish to emigrate from this God forsaken country.
If there are any false statements in this publication we will
apologise and publish a correction if necessary.
You don’t have to be a member of a political party in order to vote
for it. We recommend UKIP. email@example.com
You don’t have to me a member of a church in order to offer a prayer.
We recommend the Church of Latter Day Saints. firstname.lastname@example.org
Church is located at 64-68 Exhibition Road, South Kensington SW7
20 August 2013
Mr J Todd
Flat 18, Truro House
Westbourne Park Road
Dear Mr J Todd
Contract Account Number: 573137 632 899
Your electricity supply is at risk of being disconnected
Outstanding Balance £803.19
Notice of application hearing for warrant of entry
Despite many reminders and a statutory notice sent to you on 20 June
2013, your electricity account remains unpaid.
The arnount currently outstanding is £8O3. 19, which does not include
any additlonal costs lncurred to date.
Because you have an outstanding debt we’re entitled under Schedule 5
of the Electricity Act 1989 (as amended) and Section 2 the Rights of
Entry (Gas and Electricity Boards) Act 1954 (as amended), to apply for
a warrant to enter your property, by force if necessary and either
install a prepayment
meter or disconnect your electricity supply.
You can attend the hearing
We’ve arranged a hearing date to apply for the warrant. You’re
entitled to attend this application hearing and state any reasons why
the warrant shouldn’t be granted. The hearing will take place at
WESTMINSTER MAGISTRATES COURT, 181 MARYLEBONE ROAD, LONDON, NW1 5QJ at
09:15 on 10 September 2013.
What happens next?
Any entry warrant granted by the court at the application hearing will
be executed within 28 days of it being granted, and without further
notice being given to you. In addition to your outstanding charges,
you’ll also be required to pay for all electricity used up to the date
of execution and any costs associated with recovering the debt from
you including, where applicable, any administrative and site visit
costs, prepayment meter installation costs, and/or costs incurred in
obtaining a Warrant for entering your property to disconnect your
It may take up to two working days after receipt of your outstanding
payments to reconnect your supply.
Freepost RRYZ-BRTT-CBJS, Osprey House, Osprey Road, Exeter EX2 7WN
EDF Enerqy ir .t trading name used by FDF energy Customers plc Req.
No. 02228297 whose Registered Office s at 40 Grosvenor Piace London
SWl X 7EN
lf you have paid this amount within the last few days, or if you wish
to pay the bill now, please call us immediately on 0800 085 33’l 1*.
lf you are having difficulty paying this or any household bill and
would like advice, Citizens Advice can also offer you free,
independent, confidential and impartial advice. Please call 0808
1566666 free from a landline or 0300 3300519 from a mobile. (calls to
all 03 numbers cost no more than from an ordinary 01 or 02 geographic
number and are included in ‘free minutes’ monthly contract packages).
Signed Steve Hayfield
Customer Services Director
1bvfutures2 Money talks Wednesday
11 September 2013
To: Chief Executive Officer, Mike O’Connor, Consumer Futures, 3rd
Floor, Royal Exchange House,100 Queen Street, Glasgow G1 3DN email:email@example.com
From: James M Todd, B.Sc, 18 Truro House, Brunel Estate, Westbourne
Park Road, London W2 5UY. Phone: 020 7727 3877 Email:firstname.lastname@example.org (Still disconnected from the Internet by BT .)
Your ref. 1756074 McCurry
Dear Sir, Court Hearing?
I provided you with details of my defence. You could
have asked EDF Energy if my statement was correct and put an immediate
halt on the proceedings.
There are questions about Scottish and Southern Energy’s
criminal behaviour at Misbourne Farm Chalfont St Giles. I cannot
deal with those at present.
Today I received two letters from EDF. One posted on 10
September 2013 states my indebtedness up to 13 August 2013 was
£857.25, an increase of £64.05. EDF are still pursuing their
A second letter dated 6 September 2013 received today
against a/c no.673 137 632 899 from Simon Rowe, Complaint Resolution
Manager, informs me that they are looking into my complaint and will
resolve it as soon as they can. Simon makes a good start by taking
five days to have his letter delivered.
Simon also informs us that he can be contacted email@example.com
A recent problem arose because a British Gas Manager used
his mother, a neighbour on whom we had been on the best of terms, to
demand a key to my garage in order to check a non-existent gas
installation on behalf of National Grid.
EDF Energy, since it failed to migrate our agreement with
London Electricity, has seriously disrupted our peace of mind or our
ability to earn a living. The speeding up our meter and the cutting
off of our Economy 7 facility were examples of crime condoned by your
staff. The EDF employee who interfered with our meter should be
Yours faithfully, JAMES M TODD
Added 12 September 2013 and sent again
What was the verdict in the West London Magistrates Court
of 20 September 2013? You will recall that you were attempting to
persuade EDF not to enforce the judgement until I was given time to
collaborate or some such nonsense. JMT
EDF ENERGY DID NOT MAKE AN APPLICATION TO WEST LONDON
MAGISTRATES COURT AND WAS THEREFORE ALONG WITH YOU GUILTY OF CONTEMPT
OF COURT, BLACKMAIL, FRAUD, PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE AND
CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT CRIMINAL OFFENCES PARTICULARLY WITH REGARD TO
FALSE CLAIMS THAT THE UK COULD BE SHORT OF POWER BY THE END OF 2013.
2 Oct 2013
Dear Mr Todd
Contract Account Number: 673 137 632 899
Thank you for your email dated 24 September 2013 addressed to Steve
Hayfield, which has been passed to me as a member of his Executive
Liaison team to respond.
I acknowledge your comments regarding the reminder letter you have
received and the outstanding balance on your account, which has been
calculated using estimated meter readings. With this in mind, I would
be grateful if you could contact me at your earliest convenience to
agree a suitable date and time for us to read your meter. I can then
send you an accurate bill using the meter reading obtained and discuss
the payment options with you.
To agree a suitable appointment date please contact me on 0845 301
3521 or by return email.
Max Bennett Executive Liaison EDF Energy
2 Oct 2013)
Reply to EXEC
The starting point for you to resolve this problem is an admission
that a rogue employee speeded up our meter and cut off our economy 7
This upset our timing devices and rendered our meter readings, if any,
of no value.
Hayfield has been guilty of claiming that he had made an application
to Westminster Magistrates Court and has thereby been guilty of
serious criminal offences. Your latest email constitutes
J M Todd
Dear Mr Corbyn, firstname.lastname@example.org
Firstly my elder son, a constituent of Justice Minister Grayling
stopped bringing my food and other necessities. He resigned as
director of a company and his share passed to me. I had been unable
to leave my flat for some time because the Westminster Council ALMO
had a key to my flat. Documents were brought to me for signature.
Now my younger son has cut me off without giving reasons.
My elder son now tells me that he has sent my key to me by second
class post recorded delivery. The postman didn’t call and there was
no message left. I believe he has given my key to the lady next door
and that if I leave my flat to dump rubbish she will enter my flat and
may lock me out.
It is a tall story but the lady next door is the one who demanded the
key of my garage to allow National Grid to check the gas pipes. There
are no gas pipes in my garage. I have rewarded her handsomely for
This may be related to the false statements put out by the Tories of
the need to increase substantially the cost of energy if the lights
are not to go out.
Best wishes to you and family, J M T
Comment: I contacted Mr Corbyn because he was one of about five
Labour MPs who occupied the moral high ground. His office informed
me that I should complain to my own MP, Mrs Karen Buck who has not
only failed to represent me but has gone out of her way to harm me.
She assisted Barclays Bank. When I reported her behaviour to her
leader Mr Miliband and suggested she might be receiving a bribe from
Barclays he ignored my report. Coincidentally Carol Agius, the
first wife of the disgraced former chairman of Barclays lived on the
same council estate as me. I helped her to deal with her
harassment. She died along with her five dogs. Her death was not
discovered for weeks although she walked her dogs several times daily.
I was absent from the estate at the material time. Mrs Buck did
not help me to obtain the result of Carol’s post mortem
Thanks for Your E-Mail.
I did surrender this morning and was arrested without providing me
a copy of the warrant of arrest and as I believe there was no evidence
that I was ever convicted and there was no warrant of arrest as claimed.
Despite the above the judge stated that unless I pay he will arrest me for
28 days which amounts to fraud.
> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:18:07 +0100
> Subject: Re: FW: I, GEDALJAHU-EBERT WILL SURRENDER ON MONDAY 30.SEPTEMBER 2013 AT 9.30 am TO HENDON MAGISTRATES’ COURT ON THE ALLEGED WARRANT OF ARREST ISSUED BY Highbury Corner Magistrates on a Conviction on 08.05.2008 WHICH NEVER TOOK PLACE.
Comment: The annual conferences of the three oldest political parties
have taken place and the hardworking British People will continue to
shed tears. Mr Ebert has been subjected to unbelievable abuse for
many years. We believe him absolutely. JM
‘I, Patrick Cullinane, will demonstrate outside the Royal
Courts of In-Justice for FOUR days, starting Tue 1st October
2013, to RESTORE the Rule of Law and banish the Rule of JUDGES
from the Kangaroo Courts in the UK but only if 150 other people
from the UK will do the same. We the People in the UK have been
denied our GUARANTEED RIGHTS to due-process via the Common Law
Trial by Jury, which is the Law of the Land.’
Comment: The law hasn’t changed since the Middle Ages when there
were ‘straw men’ in the Strand outside the Law Courts. A barrister
would select his favourite liar and tell him what his evidence should
be. Barristers became judges.
BBC senior executives recalled to Parliament for ‘major inquiry’ into
Senior executives at the BBC will be recalled to Parliament as part of
a “major inquiry” into the future of the Corporation.
BBC Director General Tony Hall Photo: Lewis Whyld/PA
By Peter Dominiczak, Political Correspondent
9:50AM BST 19 Sep 2013
MPs on the Commons Culture, Media and Sport select committee will
grill BBC bosses following the row over severance payments as well as
the fallout of the Jimmy Savile sex abuse scandal.
Earlier this month seven current and former executives appeared in
front of the Public Accounts Committee and squabbled in public about
who was to blame for paying outgoing executives millions more than
they were entitled to.
John Whittingdale, the chair of the culture committee, said that the
inquiry will look at the role of the BBC Trust.
Critics have called for the trust to be scrapped in the wake of the
Mr Whittingdale said that recent events over severance payments had
given the inquiry “more urgency”. “We are going to have a major
inquiry in the run-up to charter renewal,” Mr Whittingdale told The
Re: The Royal Courts of In-Justice have taken a 5-year-old girl from a
perfect caring mother & given her to her abusing father: -Inbox
Hello there Patrick and All
From the evidence which I have read, the judgement is not merely
perverse but also sick and disgusting. It is never ending.
I bought a copy of yesterdays Daily Mail to read on my train journey
back from London and on the first few pages there are examples of
On page 1 and 2, there was the story of Wanda Maddocks, a 50 years old
lady who had been jailed for 5 months for contempt of court and, what
exactly was that contempt? — She had tried to remove her elderly
father from a care home where he had been held ‘like a prisoner’ on
the orders of a local council.
Surely this was an act of love and concern for her father and yet,
judge Martin Cardinal considered that her supposed contempt of court
act took predominance over her natural love and concern for her
Would a jury of her own peers with regard to Magna Carta, have acted
so evilly against her?
On page 3, the second case was concerning a 23 years old paranoid
schizophrenic who had a long history of mental problems and violence
and who, after attacking his own mother and a female police officer,
received an 11 days jail term.
Before this event he had spent time in prison and :——-
QUOTE – “While inside, a psychiatrist who assessed him twice
‘insisted’ Simelane needed treatment in the intensive care unit of a
secure mental hospital.”
QUOTE – “Before he was sentenced for the attack on her, Mrs
Von-Groening (His mother) wrote to the judge begging for him to be
admitted to a secure hospital. But he did not ‘meet the criteria for
admission’ and was sent to prison instead.”
Three months after his release from the 11 weeks sentence he attacked
and butchered an innocent 16 years old girl on a bus!
Had that un-named judge taken note of, and acted upon the expert
evidence which was corroborated by no less a person than the killers
own mother, and had that man been put into a secure mental hospital to
receive treatment, then a young innocent girl, with her whole life
before her, would still be alive.
In view of the evidence, would a jury of ordinary people, guided by
Magna Carta, – for his own sake and the safety of the public at large,
– have put him in a mental hospital or a prison?
But for a defective judgement that young girl would still be alive.
On page 5, the headline is “Give axe murderers the vote, says judge.”
The judge in question was a judge Paul Mahoney.
Why on earth do we have such people acting as judges when they are so
out of step with public opinion and some of their judgements are
Because these incomprehensible judgements are being spewed out on a
daily basis, is there anyone out there who can put a website together,
which we can all contribute to, entitled something to the effect of
‘Statute Law v. Common Law’ or Magna Carta v. The Judiciary?
Let’s have a website which will bring before the public the amount of
flawed judgements that are being pronounced on a daily basis.
Let’s show just how imperfect this whole ‘system’ is.
Would anyone like to expand on this theme?
My Regards to All. Colin Peters