HAMPSTEAD SRA – FOI – CHRIST CHURCH SCHOOL IS LYING – 3 JUNE 2015

June 3, 2015

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/christ_church_primary_school_hampstead_london

The very clever person who put in an FOI request for the school to disclose any surrounding tunnels has received a reply.

Alleged abuser Ann Connock writes:

“Whilst we can of course confirm there will not be, are not, nor ever have been any tunnels within or under the school and surrounding grounds,”

Wrong, Ann. Hampstead is riddled with underground tunnels.

THEN she makes a threat!

“As it stands we must give consideration to the potential vexatious aspect of this request as per Section 14(1). The request appears to be part of a completely random approach solely designed for the purpose of ‘fishing’ for information without any idea of what might be revealed.”

So we’ve had alleged abusers Sufi Dix, Paul Parsnips Goss and Friar Conrad taking Neelu to court for politely reading out some Common Law at the Church – and now an alleged abuser (and murderer) in a school that appears to be running a paedophile ring is accusing someone of being “vexatious”.

I think maybe we have to re-draft the FOI.

From: Admin at Christ Church Primary School Hampstead
Christ Church Primary School, Hampstead, London

1 June 2015

Dear

Thank you for your e-mail timed at 22:51 of the evening of 22nd May. I apologise for the delay in our response however as the school closed at 17.00 on 22nd May for half term. Regulations 3(2)(a) and 3(2)(b)of The Freedom of Information (Time for Compliance with Request) Regulations 2004 makes provision to disregard from the from the FOI timescale any working day which is not a school day. We therefore received your email on Monday 1st June.

We consider your email a significantly different question however and we require further clarification as per Section 1(3) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000

In relation to your new question, your previous request asked “The existence and location of any and all tunnels, and rooms within the school and surrounding grounds”. Whilst we can of course confirm there will not be, are not, nor ever have been any tunnels within or under the school and surrounding grounds, we consider that your new request is significantly broad with regard to its scope.

Your request is now seeking:-

Any and all:-
Maps, plans, drawings showing the school, school grounds, including under the school, and under the school grounds, including maps, plans, drawings showing parts of;- the school, school grounds, under the school and under the school grounds.
Records, including correspondence, invoices, purchase orders etc. of any and all remodelling, and or changes in use of areas of the school, school grounds including under the school and school grounds.

As it stands we must give consideration to the potential vexatious aspect of this request as per Section 14(1). The request appears to be part of a completely random approach solely designed for the purpose of ‘fishing’ for information without any idea of what might be revealed. That aside, and were this not an issue, the volume of different type of document sought without any clear parameters would likely engage the cost limit of Section 12 of the Act if we attempt to locate them.

Can you please clarify if there are specific documents you are seeking and to which period your request relates?

We look forward to hearing from you soon

Yours
Ann Connock

School Administrator

3 thoughts on “ACTION UPDATE: FOI – CHRIST CHURCH SCHOOL IS LYING”

    1. Sadly the use of the “too expensive to collate the requested info” excuse seems very convenient when trying to prise information out of certain government agencies – inc. town councils – regarding, ultimately, children. Another London council used the very same get-out card when answering a F.O.I.A. request for information. I mean, how much work is actually involved for a person or 2 to look up info and print it out? Don’t they label the folders or whatever they keep the information in, with relavent dates and titles and suchlike, so stuff can be readily found? Of course they do. What is the problem? The problem is they don’t want to tell you, that is the problem – simple as that.
      This, from the “Whatdotheyknow” site regarding an F.O.I.A. request made to Haringey council recently, the response to which was deemed “too expensive” to reveal – of course, the subject was “children” =
      “Self- harm suicide and depression in children whilst under social services —
      Haringey Borough Council sent a response to S. Prichard (29 April 2015)
      “Ms Prichard Freedom of Information Act Request (ref: LBH
      4208015) Fees Notice Thank you for your e-mail which was received
      on 17^th April…”

      https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/self_harm_suicide_and_depression_3?nocache=incoming-646811#incoming-646811

      LikeLiked by 1 person

  1. First thing to do is to use the council’s complaints procedure and ask for a review into the handling of the request. If that doesn’t work (and people in councils cover each other’s arses, so it probably won’t) try putting in a complaint to the Information Commissioner. Complaint forms on ICO website.

    LikeLike

    • Sorry but not trying to defeat the point of your comment re: the “ICO” but when I and others I know have had perfectly good reasons to take matters to the ICO when agencies have failed miserably to do their jobs properly there was no service to be had at all. To save having to read a long list of how this agency pussyfooted around for the best part of a year over what I and others considered a perfectly valid complaint, the overall conclusion arrived at was that I and others were completely stonewalled – meaning the interaction with them was dragged out over an unnecessarily and infinitely long period of time, before being dismissed as “no case to answer”. One example of this notorious ICO scam was that the employee I had to deal with kept going on holiday for 2 weeks at a time before ignoring my recorded delivery letters and phone messages, the original calls to him always being unanswered whenever I rang, which they recommend to do in their numerous and often repetitive snail mail letters.
      Like the IPCC the organisation was found to be “a tiger with no teeth” in many cases, which is a bit rich seeing as it is the taxpayer who is paying for it all and paying the employees wages. Some might call it a scam which is exactly what it is

About butlincat

my blog: http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com http://www.youtube.com/butlincat http://www.twitter.com/butlincat
This entry was posted in HAMPSTEAD "WHISTLEBLOWER KIDS" SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE [SRA], Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.