THE MUSA FAMILY – 7 stolen children – A TINY, SHOCKING PART OF WHAT HAPPENED TO THESE VISITORS TO THE U.K. + archive

These posts are from earlier in 2011 / 12 and since, and many links therein have been deleted, or tampered with, or destroyed altogether, due to matters beyond my control. However, by searching using the word “musa” or “musa case” in the search box on the page should yield results – there were 120+ posts approx. originally. This typical travesty of a “newspaper article” from an African news outlet merely replicated at least 11 UK newspaper reports on this case just after the Musa parents were sentenced to 7 years imprisonment each in August 2012 at Wood Green Crown – all the reports very similar if not identical to each other [including London’s “Evening Standard” being one such ingrate who reported the pack of lies] – the article much off the mark and totally inaccurate, but good  reading for those who like this sort of thing. The true story is so very different: “Nigerian Parents, Joseph & Gloria Musa Jailed for 7 Years in UK following Allegations of Child Abuse” https://www.bellanaija.com/2012/08/nigerian-parents-joseph-gloria-musa-jailed-for-7-years-in-uk-following-allegations-of-child-abuse/. Despite writing to the author of this report weeks before this article came out, the author refused to communicate at any time.

musa-coupleA

This PDF file [the Affadavit to the R. Cts. of Justice 11/2011] musa-wall-14-10-11-11_10_10_affidavit  contains the affidavit used in 2011 in court proceedings, and shows but a tiny part of what happened to this perfectly decent family, and the loving parents, who were visitors here, there home being in Nigeria.

The Musas were convicted based on the extremely questionable charges and sentenced to 7 years imprisonment each, for allegedly mistreating their 6 children. Since this affidavit was written by the mother of the children originally in 2010,  the Musa parents went on to receive and each has served the 7 year sentence given [3 years total inside] after a 6+ week trial during the summer of 2012, which hardly delivered proper justice, partly due to a particularly inept defence team who, for example, left out much seriously needed evidence that should have been considered in the trial. Also, only 2 witnesses were called for the defence out of scores of perfectly reasonable and available citizens that could have been called. No reason has ever been given why only 2 witnesses were called, whereas the prosecution side called no less than 43 witnesses for their case.

Another Musa sibling was born in the early hours of 10 March 2012, during his mothers incarceration in HMP Holloway, and was removed seconds later after being born. His mother and father have never seen him since – his father never seeing him at all as he too was imprisoned on remand awaiting the trial in a prison a bus ride away. The mother was drugged during childbirth so has hardly any recollection at all relating to the birth of her newborn.

Not much is left online regarding the shocking Musa case as these tortured parents requested that they be allowed to begin a new start after their leaving prison, on the 27 November 2014, and after being deported back to Nigeria – almost exactly 3 years to the day after being remanded originally. Therefore over a hundred posts from this site alone have been removed to respect their wishes. Gloria was always needing urgent and serious medical treatment whilst in prison, due to ailments received before entering prison, and also due to ailments received whilst there [eg. injuries were received after falling down due to an untreated knee ailment which was never attended to at all.  Gloria began bleeding from internally during the final birth in March 2012, whilst she was on remand in HMP Holloway, and was still bleeding on her release – this very serious medical  ailment never receiving any medical treatment whatsoever since the day it began. She would awaken daily in bloodstained sheets, having to clean them and herself in her cell. The adequate amount of sanitary towels was always restricted her also, alongside other serious irregularities, but despite numerous complaints informing various government departments, including the P.M. down, this medical treatment always was denied this woman. It is also doubtful that Gloria will ever walk without the aid of appliances again, due to these untreated ailments. Gloria served most her sentence in a wheelchair, which brought with it numerous problems, most of them completely unnecessary, but nevertheless still encountered. A new wheelchair was bought for Gloria by supporters which was delivered to the prison in March 2013, costing over £100, but she was always denied this wheelchair which came with a cushion ideal for Gloria’s use. This wheelchair even went with her when she was moved to a different prison months before her release, but still denied her always, despite continual communication with the prison service and relavent government personnel.

The parents Chiwar and Gloria were refused visiting their children for months before they were unfairly imprisoned, even though the court order was in place and had never been changed.

It is truly disgraceful how the Musa family were treated – not only whilst in UK prisons, but earlier, after this hapless and vulnerable, innocent family came into contact with certain agencies and personnel of the UK government, and that so-called “defence team” they so sadly had to tolerate – to which people could be forgiven for thinking they were working for the other side – often! They were so utterly and ridiculously [and deliberately] incompetent throught the entire case and before it and after it [for the appeals etc.] its beggars belief, eg. calling only 3 defence witnesses for the Musas during the 6+ week long [questionable] criminal trial when there were literally scores of willing friends, family and supporters available! The prosecution provided FORTY-EIGHT witnesses against the Musas!
 Later, after the trial, we found out that “D Y-O” – the family’s lead male barrister – was  allegedly a real life partner to a leading solicitor for a county child services department not so far away – something we had no idea about – see about her here: http://solicitors.lawsociety.org.uk/person/33764    . This council was connected to the “Caesarean birth and child removal case on 2013, as described here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10486452/Child-taken-from-womb-by-caesarean-then-put-into-care.html, allegedly.

May God have mercy for all those who have caused this heartbreak, and physical pain they have caused. Still, to this day, in 2015, no one except the authorities knows the whereabouts of these lost 7 children…


Update 21 July 2017: From “Researching Reform”:  Councils Using Private Investigators To Spy On Parents May Be Breaking The Law

https://www.researchingreform.net/2017/07/21/councils-using-private-investigators-to-snoop-on-parents-may-be-breaking-the-law/

An interview with the mother of the removed children: Bishop Gloria Musa, from April 2011, filmed at their West Green Rd., Tottenham [part of the borough of Haringey] address they were to be evicted from, onto the street, in August 2011, some 13 weeks prior to their imprisonment of 42 months total [from a 7 year sentence each] based on the extremely dubious conviction of “mistreating their children” – their so-called “defence team” throughout being equally dubious and questionable, in this writers opinion, because, amongst other glaring irregularities, vital evidence was kept from the trial hearing, as were numerous family friends and supporters who could’ve acted as witnesses – the prosecution called 43 witnesses in the trial, to the Musas’ total of THREE witnesses in total! https://www.vid.me/L3Ol 

article: THE MUSA ICO HEARING IRREGULARITIES
https://www.wp.me/p1SLRi-ch

What a racket:  “How Social Services are Paid Bonuses to Snatch Babies for Adoption”  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-511609/How-social-services-paid-bonuses-snatch-babies-adoption.html [this D. Mail article is from 2008 – has anything changed?].

Bishop Gloria Musa’s sworn affadavit, used at a court hearing at the RCJ in Nov. 2011:

MUSA WALL 14 10 11 11_10_10_Affidavit

Complaint re: the GUARDIAN SOLICITOR for the children:

MUSA complaint_Jonquil_Houghton_2

 

th_a8jpg2

The Irregular Interim Care Orders on the Musa children – often issued without the Musa parents being present at the monthly court hearing, which, by law, they are supposed to be if they object to an I.C.O. being issued. This was just one right denied the Musas over 20 times, suffered at the hands of these judges who ran roughshod over the law – utterly outrageous…and illegal!!

video: January 2012: https://vid.me/76jW

————————————————————————————————-

The “UK Column” reads report immediately after the rough justice imposed upon the Musa parents Bishop Gloria, and Chiwar when they both received 7 years imprisonment for allegedly “mistreating their children” after their dubious 6+ week criminal trial – the verdict issued on the 14 August 2012:   https://www.vid.me/NXPk.

Although promising to do this and that regarding this shocking case, this brief mention, which aired a couple of days after the actual sentencing of the Musa parents was the sum total of this “UK Column”‘s interest. And please, don’t be put off by Mr. Gerrish’s misleading statement at the beginning of this clip that the case was “confusing” – it was most definitely not , and the very much fabricated case against the Musa parents was as clear as it was criminal, and the irregularities performed by government employees  – from the town council [previously involved in the outrageous “Baby P” [Peter Connelly] tragedy]  to the police involved, and a great deal more government departments – were infinite as they were outrageous!

——————————————————————————————————–

Many posts that were here are removed after a request for such from the family after their release from HMP in November 2014, few remain :

The very first hearings in the Musa case, 2010:

https://butlincat.com/2011/09/25/the-m-family-6-stolen-children-by-a-hlondon-council/

M KIRK CALL FROM CARDIFF PRISON,31 Aug 12 – GLORIA MUSA: LETTER TO AUTHORITIES – IGNORED!!

https://butlincat.com/2012/08/31/m-kirk-call-from-cardiff-prison-08-17am-31-aug-12/

Chiwar and Gloria Musa in UK Sentenced to Seven Years Aug. 2012 [by that   time they had been on remand in custody for 258 days]

http://www.salem-news.com/articles/august152012/musa-sentence-jg.php

THE MUSAS FREED – TO BE DEPORTED TO AFRICA 25 NOV. ’14

https://butlincat.com/2014/11/24/the-musas-freed-on-medical-grounds-to-be-deported-to-africa-25-nov-14/

Some but not all relavent articles on the case [+ more] from Christopher Booker, for the “Sunday Telegraph”

https://mauricejohnkirk.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/11-08-03-sunday-telegraph.pdf

———————————————————————————————————-

 From “The Sunday Telegraph” – the Musa case is towards the bottom of the article “Parents who lost their six children”

“The worst scandal I have seen in my 50-year career”

By Christopher Booker
 13 Oct 2012

Our ‘child protection’ system is severely dysfunctional, but it has not come to the centre of national attention because it hides its workings behind a veil of secrecy

One mother had her child taken away after falling out of a window and becoming temporarily paralysed. Social workers portrayed it as a suicide bid, and her as an alcoholic and a drug addict

Scarcely a week goes by without more evidence emerging to indicate that our ?child protection? system is so dysfunctional that it should be looked on as a major national scandal. On one hand, we see the number of applications by social workers to take children into care soaring to nearly 1,000 a month, having more than doubled in the four years since the tragedy of Baby P. On the other, we hear of horrific episodes, like those recently reported from Rochdale and Rotherham, where social workers and police turned a blind eye to the systematic mass-rape of underage girls, many themselves in state care.

For three years I have been investigating scores of cases of children seized from their parents for what appear to be quite absurd reasons. This outrage has not yet come to the centre of national attention only because our child protection system hides its workings behind a veil of secrecy. I have been amazed to discover how our family courts routinely turn all the cherished principles of British justice upside down. The most bizarre allegations, based on hearsay, can be levelled against parents who are then denied the right to challenge them.

Although I have reported on several such cases more than once, they drag on through the courts so long that I haven?t been able to explain how they ended. I summarise three of them here to indicate why this is the most disturbing story I have covered in all my years as a journalist.

My first case centres on a mother who, five months after the birth of her daughter, fell from a first-floor window. Lying in hospital, temporarily paralysed from the neck down, she took a call from a social worker who told her that her baby was being taken into care. Although no one had suggested that her fall was anything other than an accident, the social workers made out that it was a suicide bid and that she was an alcoholic and a drug addict. A psychiatric report and clinical tests found that none of these accusations were true.

The mother had to make a weekly 80-mile round trip to have ?supervised contact? with her daughter. The contact supervisor wrote glowing reports on how closely they seemed to be bonded. But when, at a case conference, a social worker was challenged by the supervisor for having excised any references to this from her reports, it was the supervisor the council suspended. After a succession of hearings at which, I gather, the judge became increasingly impatient with the social workers for their sloppy handling of paperwork and repeated requests for adjournments, it seemed the case was going the mother?s way. Her wish for her daughter to be returned to her was supported by the child?s ?guardian? (an official appointed by the court to represent the child?s interests).

But then, for no clear reason, fortune swung back the other way. Two years after the case began, the judge ruled that the child should be sent for adoption. As the mother made a final plea to the Appeal Court, a lurid report in the local paper repeated all the original claims of the social workers: that the mother was an alcoholic, a drug addict and had tried to commit suicide. A family friend tells me she witnessed the distraught mother being allowed a ?goodbye session? with her daughter, the centre of her life for three years, whom she will never be allowed to see again.

The runaways

My second case centres on a mother who fled to Ireland with her teenage son because social workers had been making enquiries about them, due to the fact that the father, who had been out of their lives for six years, was an alcoholic prone to violence. When they had been happily settled in their new home for six months, with the boy doing well at school, British social workers brought the father to Ireland and persuaded an Irish judge, on evidence that mother and son were not allowed to see, to order the boy?s deportation back to England. He was so depressed that he attempted suicide. (I spoke to the boy in hospital shortly afterwards).

After being taken to England, the boy was placed in foster care, where he managed repeatedly to convey to his mother that he was desperately unhappy. Although bright, he was initially sent to a special needs school, where he was bullied for being so different from the others. He was denied the right to attend court to express his wishes, in contravention of the UN Convention on Children?s Rights. Neither he nor the mother had anyone to speak up for them and, although there is no evidence that she ever harmed her son, it was ruled that he must remain in foster care until he is 18 (normally, children are released from care when they are 16). The mother continues to work in Ireland, denied any further contact with her son until he is old enough to return to her.

Parents who lost their six children [this article by C. Booker was written before the birth of the Musa’s 7th sibling, born in a cell in HMP Holloway in the early hours of the 10 March 2012, and removed seconds later, during Gloria’s remand awaiting trial on the most questionable of charges]

My third case is the strangest and most disturbing of any I have covered. I first came to it shortly after the mother of a large family had given birth to her sixth child. Her new baby had been torn from her arms in a hospital bed by six policemen and three social workers just three hours after the birth. Three months earlier, the social workers had removed five older children from the family home in the belief that the mother was a ?sex worker? engaged in child trafficking with her husband, whom they claimed was not the father of any of the children. The social workers also had a letter, allegedly written by one of the children, claiming that her mother had beaten her.

What made all this particularly odd was that, one by one, these claims seemed to crumble. DNA tests showed that the children all came from the husband. The letter was in a different hand from that of the child supposed to have written it, but no graphological tests were allowed and it was eventually admitted that the letter had been ?destroyed?.

For a time, the parents were allowed occasional supervised contact with their children, although for this they had to travel for four hours. The oldest child claimed at one meeting that she had been sexually interfered with in her foster home ? after which she was never allowed to see her parents again.

But the case against them began to seem so flimsy that the baby was returned to them. However, they subsequently took the baby to a hospital to ask for advice on a puzzling complaint. A junior doctor carried out blood tests which apparently showed nothing amiss, but when the family?s name came up on a computer, the social workers were summoned. More tests were carried out, the parents were accused of giving their child a dangerous drug and the baby was again taken into care.

Events then took a still more serious turn. The couple were arrested, accused of planning to abduct their older children (even though they had no idea where they were) and fly them abroad in a private plane. They were sent to prison on remand, while a long list of further charges was compiled, ranging from physical abuse of their children to a claim that they had sought to kill the baby.

At their trial, 44 prosecution witnesses were called. Only two were allowed for the defence. The children spoke on video link, but their parents were not allowed to question them. The parents were given long prison sentences and a family court then ruled that the children must all be sent for adoption.

However odd all this may seem, I know enough about this family, and a story I have followed since 2010, to believe that it represents a travesty of justice which says much about what our child protection system has become.

>> source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/9606161/The-worst-scandal-I-have-seen-in-my-50-year-career.html
——————————————————————————-

TELEGRAPH: JUDGE SLAMS HARINGEY COUNCIL OVER MY MOST SHOCKING FAMILY CASE EVER – CHRISTOPHER BOOKER [Sunday Telegraph, 05 July 2014]

Haringey went ‘behind my back’, says Mr Justice Holman over forced break-up of family

Mr Justic Holman condemned Haringey for having deceitfully broken both procedures and the law Photo: Alamy
 

Holman only came into this case at the end of a four-year long saga that had already been before more than half a dozen other High Court judges. What he had to decide was whether, as an earlier judge had ruled they must be, the five older children, now in different foster homes, should be allowed to maintain contact with the two youngest (who have been sent for adoption and whom Haringey wishes to be given new names). Holman discovered, first, that Haringey had secretly and blatantly disobeyed that earlier ruling, by last year breaking off the children’s contact for several months until, in December, they were allowed to meet for a final “goodbye session”.

Holman repeatedly expressed his astonishment that the council had knowingly broken a court order in this way. But he was then even more astonished to discover that Haringey had managed to get the court website to remove the very judgment he had ordered to be published. In his own words, Haringey had, “gone completely behind my back”, to persuade “Bailii to remove from the public website” the judgment that he had “deliberately placed” there, “pursuant to the practice direction of the President of the Family Division” (Lord Justice Munby, who has been valiantly striving to open up the family courts to “the glare of publicity”).

Again and again in his forensically argued judgments, Holman condemned Haringey for having deceitfully broken both procedures and the law, expressing his “grave concern” at what the council had been doing. While he very reluctantly concluded that, following that illegal “goodbye session”, it was probably not practical to undo the damage, he ended one judgment by saying, “On that incredibly melancholy note, and with the utmost despair on my part, I draw the present hearing to a close.” 

But Holman was careful to say that he was not familiar with all the earlier stages of this case, although he knew that it has been widely referred to on the internet and has aroused huge public concern in Nigeria. Had he in fact known all of what Haringey and the courts have done to this family since 2010, he would have been utterly appalled. Right from the start, the children were initially removed from their parents on allegations so implausible that the council eventually had to drop them and come up with new ones, quite different. After many more tragic twists and turns to the story, the parents ended up, following a very odd criminal trial, being given long prison sentences,

 
Here is the HHJ Holman judgement of the 26 April 14: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2014/1341.html
 
Same case, from April: 

 Gloria Musa: her Deteriorating Health Condition in HMP Send:
5 July 2014

When I, with another friend visited Gloria Musa on Saturday 28th June 2012 on a social visit at HMP Send, we were shocked not only by at Gloria’s physical state of health and well-being, but also by what she told us on this visit.
She told us that she now had a “lump” in her groin area, presumably brought on by the infection she has as a result of bleeding from internally for so long since giving birth to a baby on March 10 2012. This ailment has never been addressed properly by any health official anywhere, as its obvious if this had happened Gloria would not be still bleeding, and, we are told, awakening each new day in bloodstained bedsheets.
It is thought this “lump” Gloria now has could also have been caused by her possibly having an untreated hernia, originating from the birth of her child in March 2014.
The authorities especially prison department personnel, including the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman, and the Minsistry of Justice, N.O.M.S., and the I.M.B. have been told time and time again about Gloria’s serious medical conditions, including:

a] her painful hip and knee problems,
b] the “lump” she speaks of in her groin area,
c] along with a painful infection which carries with it “warts”in her groin area, making it very painful to sit down on anythuing except a cushion, we have been told, and
d] her continuous bleeding from her stomach, the blood exiting from her groin area,
e] Gloria is now vomiting continually also, and
f] her eyesight is failing.
g] Gloria speaks of having painful mouth ulcer alsos.
After a fall in the past from her wheelchair whilst in HMP Holloway it is understood, when she called supporters, she had a cut had which was possibly broken too. This hand has now reset but not to how it shouldve done. Gloria told us when calling in distress directly after her fall that when she asked for help in the prison she was told by warders that as she was a bishop she should “heal herself”. It is understood Gloria was finally given a plaster to put on the cut to her hand, but anyone seeing Gloria now can see the damage to her hand where the bones have not reset properly.

Most of these ailments have been with Gloria a very long time but nothing has been done by anybody to remedy and rectify properly these serious medical health conditions.On complaining to the Ministry of Justice [their reply is attatched to this note] their reply stated that all inmates get the best possibl;e NHS care. Other departments written to state whichever department cannot intervene in single case – apparently not even if they are as serious as Gloria’s obvious lack of medical treatment..

Furthermore, we were told on our visit on the 28 June that the standard waste bins in her cell are not being emptied, and the contents, which include items such as bloody tissues etc. used to deal with and clean her bleeding in her groin, and the contents from her continual vomiting are left to accumulate in these receptacles for periods of time. Gloria is bedridden and unable to clear this waste, she tells us.This is completely unhygenic, and surely goes against the Health and Safety Regulations in place at the prison.

We were also told how certain warders are telling Gloria that they “hate her” – showing her absolute contempt,which goes against these prison warders code of conduct for dealing with prison inmates.
We were also told how certain warders have been telling other inmates to avoid Gloria Musa at all costs, that she is an appalling mother guilty of heinous crimes. This again is completely unacceptable behaviour for a prison warder.

I ask you to understand what is going on here as this appalling lack of medical care and disgraceful victimisation against this vulnerable and very ill lady should not be taking place as it has been from day 1 of her entry into the UK prison system on the 28 November 2011.

Please see the attatched letter from the Ministry of Justice concerning inmates and the healthcare they supposedly get. This most definately is not the case for Gloria’ Musa, or if she is getting the best of healthcare, why is she still bleeding from internally for over 27 months, along with her numerous other continuing serious ailments?

J. Graham
Mckenzie friend to the Musa family and concerned citizen

UPDATED 5 July 2014 – this is a true sworn statement and for confirmation of anything written kindly confirm with Bishop Gloria Musa.

Attatched are a tiny sample from numerous replies from departments relating to Gloria Musa’s health and medical creonditions, including:

2 replies from the Inspector of Prisons

1 from the I.M.B.,

1 from N.O.M.S.

2 sheets from Prime Solicitors from August 2013 [entitled “gloria prime1 9aug”  + “gloria1 prime1 9aug”],

 plus an official complaint Gloria made re: being constantly harassed by certain prison personnel,

a letter from Killick, HMP Holloway governor, who states she will not be communicating with me re: Gloria – this sent after my very 1st communication to her. Maybe she knew something we didn’t?, viz., how Gloria would be treated whilst in her prison? Gloria’s health deteriorated rapidly after entering HMP Holloway. Needless to say, a great amount of discernment must be used when reading the government departments replies as they contain many inaccuracies – eg., Gloria has agreed to medical treatment, and we  swathe effects on a visit of her being on at least 5 unspecified medications, which made her ill – so ill in fact she had to come off these drugs. When asked for the names of the drugs Gloria was not told, worryingly. She  stated at the time, on a visit, that she was losing the sight of her left eye since taking the prescribed medications she knew not the names of, and suffered much nausea also. That is one fallacy in the letters of reply – there are more.

Also attatched is Gloria Musa’s affidavit 11/2011

REPLY FROM Ministry of Justice regarding prison inmates medical treatment:

white2 011aa.jpg2.jpgz

 
10 attachments — Download all attachments   View all images   Share all images  
HARDWICK REDAXCTED REPLY 20MAR134682.jpg HARDWICK  REPLY 20MAR134682.jpg
1739K   View   Share   Download  
HARDWICK 12 12 2012268 redacted.jpg HARDWICK 12 12 2012268 redacted.jpg
970K   View   Share   Download  
MOJ 15 JAN REDACT.jpg MOJ 15 JAN REDACT.jpg
2720K   View   Share   Download  
KIILLICK 10OCT12349 2.jpg KIILLICK 10OCT12349 2.jpg
1147K   View   Share   Download  
gloria3 9aug13277.jpg gloria3 9aug13277.jpg
3777K   View   Share   Download  
IMBLETTER 8 SEPT 12163A.jpg IMBLETTER 8 SEPT 12163A.jpg
730K   View   Share   Download  
gloria1 prime1 9aug13276A.jpg gloria1 prime1 9aug13276A.jpg
1230K   View   Share   Download  
gloria prime1 9aug13275.jpg gloria prime1 9aug13275.jpg
1598K   View   Share   Download  
a1.jpg a1.jpg
14K   View   Share   Download  
MUSA WALL 14 10 11 11_10_10_Affidavit.pdf MUSA WALL 14 10 11 11_10_10_Affidavit.pdf
424K  
View   Download  
 
10 attachments — Download all attachments   View all images   Share all images 
 
HARDWICK REDAXCTED REPLY 20MAR134682.jpg HARDWICK  REPLY 20MAR134682.jpg
1739K   View   Share   Download  
HARDWICK 12 12 2012268 redacted.jpg HARDWICK 12 12 2012268 redacted.jpg
970K   View   Share   Download  
MOJ 15 JAN REDACT.jpg MOJ 15 JAN REDACT.jpg
2720K   View   Share   Download  
KIILLICK 10OCT12349 2.jpg KIILLICK 10OCT12349 2.jpg
1147K   View   Share   Download  
gloria3 9aug13277.jpg gloria3 9aug13277.jpg
3777K   View   Share   Download  
IMBLETTER 8 SEPT 12163A.jpg IMBLETTER 8 SEPT 12163A.jpg
730K   View   Share   Download  
gloria1 prime1 9aug13276A.jpg gloria1 prime1 9aug13276A.jpg
1230K   View   Share   Download  
gloria prime1 9aug13275.jpg gloria prime1 9aug13275.jpg
1598K   View   Share   Download  
a1.jpg a1.jpg
14K   View   Share   Download  
MUSA WALL 14 10 11 11_10_10_Affidavit.pdf MUSA WALL 14 10 11 11_10_10_Affidavit.pdf
424K  
View   Download  

=========================================================

UPDATE: As I write on 21 May 2015, Gloria Musa is still undergoing treatment in a Nigerian hospital, and is awaiting serious operations which might allow her to walk proplerly again without aids. Gloria was in a wheelchair for the last half of the 3 years she was forced to endure in HM prisons, and the doctors in Nigeria stated they were surprised she was still alive after all she had been through since August 14 2012, up till November 27 2014, when the Musa parents Chiwar and Bishop Gloria were released and deported back home to Nigeria. The whereabouts of their 7 children is unknown, sadly.

LINKS + PICS TO BE UPDATED!

a3

CHILD STEALING BY THE STATETHE MUSA CASE

« on: September 06, 2013, 02:59:13 PM »

These articles originally appeared on Truth-wars site beginning last September 2012

th_a8jpg2aba

           
Truthwars –  Author Topic: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE   (Read 4737 times as of July 2013)

on: September 09, 2012, 01:09:30 PM

All over the country many children are being removed from good families under the most dubious of circumstances by town councils, SS and others, often in via the Secret Family Courts. When told about irregularities in cases the authorities do nothing. It is time it was stopped.

   ImageProxy

above: Chiwar and Gloria Musa outside the RCJ, August 2011 with the very much victimised Maurice Kirk’

THE MUSA CASE – 7 CHILDREN REMOVED BY A COUNCIL :

On the 8 April 2010 at around 4pm 8 policemen let themselves in by key to the Musa family council home and removed the Musa’s 5 children without any notice or prearrangement. The children were removed on what later were found to be totally untrue allegations made by certain employees at Y council. All allegations have been disproven, the allegations ranging from the children not being the Musas offspring and were being trafficked, to the children being beaten and generally mistreated by their parents.
Regarding the child trafficking allegation that the children were not the Musas offspring and they were part of a child trafficking network, DNA tests instigated by the Musa parents taking an unusually phenominally long time to undertake proved without a shadow of a doubt that the children were indeed the Musas children, proving also the children were in no way being trafficked in any shape or form. After this allegation was disproved other equally ridiculous allegations were made to keep the children from returning to their once happy home. One such allegation  was that Gloria Musa was an active sex worker – a prostitute – who plied her trade not only in front of and with her church congregation but also in front of her children. She is, in fact. an ordained bishop in the Evangelical Church of Africa and is not and has never been what this allegation alleges. This ridiculous allegation was made with no evidence of any kind to substantiate it yet the court believed this nonsense, along with other unsubstantiated allegations such as the children being beaten by the parents, even though medical examinations made when the council took the children showed no sign of anything to back their allegations of cruelty by the parents towards their children. Even though the allegations were proven groundless never was it mentioned that the children were to be returned to their parents as they should have been, of course. Quite the opposite in fact took place in that a 6th child was removed from the Musa parents, the hitherto unborn baby at the time of the April 8 2010 child removals. The baby x6 was stolen once at her birth, the violence of the police during the removal operation in the hospital at 3 in the morning directly after Gloria had just given birth nearly killing this defenceless mother {she is still suffering appalling injuries to this day which the prison,for she is in prison {see update below} will not address by denying her proper medical treatment}.

The baby was returned later after a matter of weeks, but was stolen again on even more dubious allegations on June 28th 2011, and the parents have not seen the baby since that date. The baby’s removal, like the entire case, needs an honest investigation away from the entities already involved.

Around 4 months after the children were removed the eldest, now 12 year old x1, complained of being “inappropriatly touched” – sexually molested in other words – by the teenage habitee of the home she was placed in. Ever since this child complained of this appalling sexual harrassment, in August 2010, all contact visits ordered by the court ceased – which was against all the orders the courts themselves made, against the governments “Childrens Charter” {which actually promotes contact between removed children and their parents}, and against the entire familiy’s Human Rights. For the child X1 not to have been seen for over 18 months since she claimed of being a victim of sexual abuse is surely outrageous. Nor has anybody from the Nigerian High Commission seen any of the children either during this entire period – especially after an injunction was put in place to stop anyone from the Commission seeing the children when the parents were imprisoned on remand the 28th November 2011 – some of the diplomats at the Commission are actually Godparents of some of the Musas’ children – and for over 18 months from when the child made the allegation of sexual abuse to her parents they did not know whether the child was alive or dead, or was even in this country as the council refused not only to allow any contact visits  but also refused to give any details whatsoever about the child when the parents enquired after her wellbeing. This is surely disgraceful and plainly cruel – the child was made to simply vanish from her parents lives to be never seen again.
The council had also allegedly changed this childs name – this article on “Parent Alienation Syndrome” shows how changing a childs name, location and lifestyle can turn her away from her loving parents and all she knew before her removal – a psychological “confidence trick” to which some vulnerable children can easily be made to succomb to – with or without prescribed medication. Often the entire trauma of the forced breakdown of the childs former loving family life helps the new identity take root – it is a form of Mind Control:

http://www.coeffic.demon.co.uk/pas.htm

Although commonly used in divorce cases it can of course be used to alienate parents after the child is moved into a foster home.

Recently on the 28th June 2011 the Musas took their baby x3 to Z hospital, London as they thought she seemed to have a fever – a temperature. This was enough for Z council to arrange for the police to remove the baby, claiming minutes later she had been administered hard drugs, even though tests taken by medical staff at the hospital at the time proved negative for all drugs in not only the baby but also in both parents. Nevertheless an Emergency Protection Order {EPO} was placed on the baby immediately and she has been removed from the Musa family and not seen by them since, even though the reasons for the baby’s removal are totally fictional. At a court hearng on the 7th July the judge, who happened to be the original judge who ordered the removal of the other 5 children, believing the Z councils allegations, confirmed he would be issuing an Interim Care Order {ICO} on the newly taken baby, thus effectively removing her from the parents care, when a 2 week period was up. This he duly did, and the x3 has not now been seen since 28th June 2011, some 16 months ago from the date of her removal. For no contact visits to be allowed during this period is totally illegal, against all orders the court has made regarding the childrens contact visits with their parents, against the “Childrens Act” and against the parents and baby’s Human Rights.

Allegations by the council, in the early stages of this case, were that Gloria Musa was given opium by her stepfather whilst in the UK as a teenager. These are complete lies, yet were part and parcel of the allegations used to remove and keep these children. Gloria Musa has no stepfather, has never taken opium at any time, and was not in the UK as a teenager. This is just one totally false allegation fabricated by the council and used in the removal of the Musa children. It has been said by the president of the secret closed family courts that “professionals dont lie”. This in itself is completely untrue which should be ignored completely always. There is overwhelming evidence of lies being told in this Musa case let alone numerous other cases of child removal in the UK, such as the cases of Vicki Haigh, Maureen Spalek, Cheryl Stannard, Eve Pears, the Baylis family, Paul Manning and many more – which of course is completely unacceptable. The people removing the children are public servants and are not paid to act like this – their wages are paid partly by the very people having their children removed under seemingly very dubious circumstances – it is wrong. The figures are at an all time high [from 14 April 2012]:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2128987/Children-stolen-state.html

  and the figures for children taken is ever increasing: Children waiting for adoption figures at all time high:

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/121893/ADOPTION

Many other irregularities and anomalies exist in this outrageous case:

 The court orders concerning contact visits with the children have not been adhered to by the agency responsible for them on scores of occasions, and nothing has ever been done about this, causing much unneccassary grief, worry and financial hardship for these parents who seem to have been targetted by Haringey council employees and those connected to it. Supporters have written hundreds of emails and many letters sent by postal recorded delivery to MPs and other so-called “authority figures” {such as police and a Chief Constable} all of which have been totally ignored, and have made each and every person told absolutely aware of so many irregularities an and crimes committed in this appalling case and who exactly has undertaken what is described. Even so nothing is ever done about anything by anybody clearly and concisely told about the unacceptable events, even when trying to inform them of 9 year old girl x1 {at the time} being sexually molested by a teenager she was sadly placed at the home of.
The Musa parents were remanded in prison on the 28th November 2011 and after a trial which began in May 2012 and lasted 6 weeks approx. they were found guilty of “mistreatment of their children” {see update below} and sentenced to 7 years each, and to be deported immediately on release back to Nigeria.

By a “balance of probabilities” at a Family Court last November at a 6 day hearing the verdict was given in favour of the prosecutions case. Injunctions against me forbid me to say any more about this, but the Musa parents are far removed from anything to do with what is alleged and did not even have legal representation for that important hearing as they simply couldnt get any, and they have not had legal representation for most of the legal hearings held, as not only can legal representatives not be got to represent the family for some strange reason as i said, but those that do take the case on strangely “change” after a couple of weeks to act in a way completely opposite to that which they should, viz. they stop acting in the parents interests. The legal profession is a very closely knit one – so many are “pals” with the “you scratch my back and ill scratch yours” attitude and many are previous colleagues even and word soon gets about which cases are a “no-no” and those which have a “tick” by their name – those “no-no”s seem to be protected by secrecy laws and dubious “high-ups” {who we the tax-payer pay the salaries of] who cannot afford any more public scandals such as the very sad “Baby P” case, of which it is well known Haringey council played a major part, {see:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Baby_P } and sadly we all know what happened to poor Peter Connolly, R.I.P.  Bless him and may he be at peace always…

There is a list of solicitors I personally have who’s actions leave much to be desired who most definately have not acted in their clients interests in this case – like, for example, not turning up for an important hearing as they were supposed to as Mr. Paul K-W didnt.
The list is long and it is such a shame things have come to be how they are.

The sentencing at the Musa’s trial was given on the August 14 2012 at Z crown court. [see below for update}.
A whistleblower from the crown court where the trial was held for the criminal case against the Musa parents has said the jury was not picked as it should have been – from the Electoral Roll etc.. Rather, it was handpicked by certain parties.
Also questions must be asked as to the eligibility of the judge who presided over the trial.
 The defence team did not do their jobs in so many ways, or they knew about certain things and did not act correctly as they should have. Much is to be said about their legal prowess which varied from sheer utter incompetance to blind ignorance of the basic facts of the case. The Musa family are paying dearly for these characters mistakes, deliberate and not and were, sadly, in a “no win” situation.
 
One can imagine that this case which began really around Christmas of 2009 has many twists and turns, but not only that but numerous irregularities and even outright crimes exist, undertaken by people who know better. The evidence for all I allege can be produced at any time.
    
These are just the basic facts of this harrowing case but so many more irregularities exist, and it is such a shame this has to be written at all.

This is a true sworn statement and I contend a factual opinion of what has taken place and any further details can be given on request from me John Graham adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk.

 Video: The Musa Case – The Irregular Interim Care Order Hearings: [to be updated]

——————————————————————————————

UPDATE  16  AUG.  2012
 
The Musa parents received 7 years imprisonment on the 14 Aug. 2012 at Y Court, and are to be deported to Nigeria immediately on finishing their sentence. They have served already 259 days leading up to today in custody in  prison.
 
Although grief stricken on receiving this verdict they bore the outrage with dignity before being dragged away from the glass-lined witness box to be taken back to their respective prisons to begin their completely unjust sentences.
 
Chiwar called at 7.30 pm and seemed very reasonable in the circumstances.
 
A great travesty of justice was performed today.
 
An appeal will be lodged alongside the appeal for the conviction itself.
 
There needs to be a thorough honest investigation and enquiry into the entire Musa case of their 7 children being removed by the UK government, where so many irregularities exist, along with contraventions of court orders, and blatant breaches of every family members human rights time and time again.
Regarding unanswered irregularities, as of the 9 Sept. 2012 there is still missing electronic data connected to the 2nd youngest baby x3’s medical records on her entry into hospital on the morning of 28 June 2011 that needs to be addressed, and also a handwritten “letter” allegedly written by the eldest Musa daughter x1, now 12, has never been officially confirmed as being written by her by any trained official graphologist but should have been. There is the unaddressed allegation that x1 suffered sexual abuse at the hands of the teenage member of the household she was placed with immediatly on being removed from her family in April 2010. The police have refused to investigate  properly in any shape or form anything regarding this matter, even though I have officially notified the Chief Constable of Dorset 3 times about this, along with every MP time and time again along with other government departments. 
These last 3 matters mentioned have not been addressed properly at all by the Musa’s legal representatives, who seem to have shirked completely certain responsibilities they clearly have regarding the important subjects just mentioned.

Other subjects exist too that need to be addressed but havent been, such as the childrens contact visits with their parents not taking place {for over 18 months in the case of the eldest child x1}, the worthless travel warrants issued to the Musa parents for the contact visits, which were continuously given even though the council were fully aware the travel warrants the Musas were given were worthless and unusable, and the feasance and malfeasance etc of the childrens “guardian solicitor”, for whom the Solicitors Regulation Authority refused to investigate time after time when official complaints were issued to them regarding her irresponsible, unprofessional and often criminal behaviour along with the Legal Ombudsman who also ignored notifications of serious wrongdoing by this rogue solicitor. Indeed, when I complained to the Legal Ombudsman about the actions of the SRA refusing to deal with the irresponsible behaviour by the children’s “guardian solicitor” and about my other grievances I was informed that the department was “closed” to me on these matters! “Closed” indeed!
 The prisons the Musas are resident at have consistently failed to provide the proper care and responsibility they are supposed to – mail to the Musas is often undelivered to them or takes weeks to get to them, prearranged visits are denied whereby visits are officially made yet when the visitors go they are denied seeing either Musa, and more – but the most serious inaction by Holloway womens prison is regarding the medical care Gloria is and was supposed to receive whilst resident with them – that medical care being almost nonexistent most of the time even though numerous government agencies have been notified time and time again about the situation.  
 
Chiwar has never ever set eyes on his newborn son born on March 10 2012, let alone ever hold him in his arms, and Gloria has only ever had a fleeting glimpse of her new son during birth and at no time since. They may never see any of their children ever again, as everything will be done to discourage any knowledge of anything to do with their children ever reaching these victimised and tortured parents once their lengthy prison sentences are completed and they are deported back to Africa. It is a public scandal and what has and is happening and something needs to be done about it immediately lest anything like this ever happens to any innocent victims ever again.
 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 Much persecuted whistleblower + Musa supporter Maurice Kirk, pictured with Chiwar and Gloria Musa outside the Royal Courts of Justice Sept. 2011, when there was another of the numerous hearings held in a closed court.

Important Videos, Links, + Christopher Booker “Sunday Telegraph” Articles beginning April 2010:

1] My videos of interviews with Chiwar and Gloria Musa in their former home, under the control of of the X council who evicted them on ridiculously short notice in Aug. 2011. A very onesided appeal took place at Edmonton court, at which I was present, where the Musas stood no chance, especially with no legal representation, as the Musa’s lay legal rep. was ejected from the room at the very start of the proceedings. Another very wrong farce of a hearing. The Musas were duly evicted with nowhere to go and they became homeless, sleeping on friends couches to other friends couches, occasionally staying in church halls when the churches weren’t being used, until a few weeks aftwer being made homeless effectively the 7 years sentence began by them being placed on remand on the most dubious of charges on Nov. 28 2011 after being called to an emergency hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice – the scene of the closed court hearing from 4 weeks previously at which I was present. This is travesty reported elsewhere in these articles

These videos from April 2011 of Chiwar and Bishop Gloria Musa at their Haringey home, before their imprisonment [on remand] on Nov. 28 2011, before their 7 year sentencing 259 days later on Aug. 14 2012, and before the birth of their 7th baby, in Holloway prison, on March 10 2012 – the baby being removed at once before even Gloria could look at him properly, and Chiwar, the father, has never seen this child at all – he has simply vanished into the care system along with the other 6 children and who knows where they all are now: [videos total length 26 mins]
 
a] http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=11f53cd65762834b3af0b2d&skin_id=1603&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url
 
b] http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=11f5398ceed4e4e312670f4&skin_id=601&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

 
2}  Video: The Musa Case – The Irregular Interim Care Order Hearings: During 2010, from the date in April then the then 5 Musa children were removed by Haringey council and during November 2011 when the Musa parents were remanded in prison on very dubious charges every 28 days the Interim Care Order on each child had, by law, to be renewed in the Family court. It was the parents right to attend this hearing each time it occurred if they objected to the ICO being issued, which eas the case each 28 days. But on January 12 2012 when Chiwar Musa was due in court for the ICO renewal hearing instead of being taken to the court he was taken everywhere but. Coming from Pentonville prison he was at first driven in the prison transport to the Royal Courts of Justice but instead of being taken to the hearing there the van drove around the car park there for a few minutes before being taken to a completely different court where they parked up for hours before he was taken back to the prison. There could have been np mistake about this hearing, the participants and the location etc as this was a monthly ritual held every 28 days as stated, but not only that but I had confirmed everything with the court employee whowas very well versed and ready with answers regarding the events to come the following day when I called the court the day before. This was not the first time the Musas have been disallowed from appearing at their ICO hearings, as Chiwar and Gloria will tell anybody.  This type of thing is a typical irregularity within the legal framework of the Musas’ case – on other occasions I am told hearings have taken place without the Musas being present which, of course, is their legal right in every instance. If any complaint is made about anything it is quickly ignored and brushed aside – that has been the norm in 99% of instances for over 3 years.

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=12130faedd68d9190602b96&skin_id=3000&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

3}  Reporter Christopher Bookers articles for the “Sunday Telegraph” on this case {these links stop Aug. 2011 – more articles exist} =
 
http://mauricejohnkirk.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/11-08-03-sunday-telegraph.pdf
 
4}  April 2008 Daily Mail = “Baby P council falsely accused me of abusing a child, reveals whistleblower who feared she’d lose her daughter.”
{By Eileen Fairweather} =
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1086196/Baby-P-council-falsely-accused-abusing-child-reveals-whistleblower-feared-shed-lose-daughter.html

4a]  WHISTLEBLOWER UKRAINIAN PRIEST TELLS OF UNITED NATION’S [U.N.] AGENDA OF CHILDSTEALING WORLDWIDE….please persevere thru to the end with this video – the translating from Ukrainian to English takes its toll on some viewers,sadly…

https://www.vimeo.com/64441928

5a}  Figures at an all time high for children being removed from families, most often good, loving ones – Daily Mail April 12 2012 =
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2128987/Children-stolen-state.html

b] DAILY MAIL, 17 April 13 – “Thousands of children abused in their own homes are not being protected by local authorities, damning NSPCC report warns”

IT SEEMS THE NSPCC ARE ONE OF THE ORGANISATIONS BEHIND THE CHILDSTEALING RACKET IN THE UK – WHICH SPREADS WORLDWIDE VIA THE U.N. – ALL BACKED BY BRITISH TAX MONEY.
How do they know this? do they go into the hiomes and see the abuse? of course they dont – its propaganda used to steal children – and there mustake record is out of all comprehension.
The rubbish is here:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2310840/Thousands-children-abused-homes-protected-local-authorities-damning-NSPCC-report-warns.html?ito=feeds-newsxml%5B/url%5D

5c] The Guardian “Adoption and children in state care across England: get the data” – 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/sep/26/adoption-and-care-statistics-england?intcmp=239
 
6} The African publication “The Leadership”‘s articles are just 2 of many African exposes on the case:

http://leadership.ng/nga/articles/5282/2011/09/17/british_journalist_writes_jonathan_over_seized_nigerian_children.html

http://web.archive.org/web/20111201190116/http://leadership.ng/nga/articles/4068/2011/08/21/british_govt_detains_nigerian_couple%E2%80%99s_six_children.html

7]  Children waiting for adoption figures at all time high:

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/121893/ADOPTION__FIGURES_AT_ALL_TIME_HIGH_OF_CHILDREN_IN_CARE_WAITING_FOR_ADOPTION__SKY_NEWS_21_JAN_13/

 8]  Affadavits:
File1:
 File Name: MUSA MOJI AFFADAVIT.pdf
 Description: MOJI WORD AFFADAVIT 20/4/11
 File Size: 182.1 KB
 Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/5tt9am
 
File 2:
 File Name: MUSA FULL PDF 4 3 12.pdf
 Description: RESUME / GLORIA STATEMENT 4/3/12
 File Size: 130.6 KB
 Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/imddy9

8] Letter 20 March 2013 sent by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery to 5 Ministry ofJustice representatives – as usual  no replies have been received as of 25 days later – and one letter to Lord Mcnally didnt even get delivered, according to an operative at the post room at parliament. Many more letters have been sent by recorded delivery – 99% remain unanswered, especially from the Ministry of Justice:

http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/eblkjc

9] MailOnline article 26 July 2013 by Sue Reid: ‘For years I fought against secret courts breaking up families. At last there’s hope’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2377084/SUE-REID-For-years-I-fought-secret-courts-breaking-families-At-theres-hope.html#ixzz2aJqP7uQa

10] Christopher Booker article 20 July 13: ‘Our child protection system is an international scandal’

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10191983/Our-child-protection-system-is-an-international-scandal.html

11] The council responsible for Baby Peter and Victoria Climbie has failed another child, a serious case review has found: BBC NEWS ONLINE 11 Oct. 2013

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-24484148

—————————————————-

   For more on the Musa case, Maurice Kirk, the Baylis family, Norman Scarth:

  http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com

…butlincat.

Maurice Kirk, Musa campaigner, at present in Cardiff prison for the 3rd time in the past 12 months on totally dubious “charges” – pls see my wordpress blog for recent phone calls from Cardiff prison + his case- + see videos on youtube, one being
 Last Edit: May 28, 2013, 06:01:07 AM by butlincat

——————————————————————————–
 
the leveller
Trusted
Hero Member
*****
 Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

 Reply #1 on: September 10, 2012, 09:23:46 PM
Landmark trial over baby snatched from Spain

In May and June I reported here more than once on the extraordinary legal drama over a baby born to an English couple living in France, Joe Ollis and Marie Black,  who was tracked down, seized and brought back to England by Norfolk social workers. A High Court judge then ruled that the social workers had acted illegally under an EU law, known as ‘Brussels II’. Because the baby had never had ‘habitual residence’ in England, he ruled that the British courts had no jurisdiction, ordering the child to be returned to its overjoyed parents in France.

At the same time, I reported on the equally disturbing case of a Welsh mother who had escaped to Spain for the birth of her baby in April. Social workers were determined to seize this baby because they had already taken an older child from her after an episode involving abuse by a former partner long out of her life. So desperate were they to track down the mother and new baby that the Welsh police in turn arrested the child’s grandmother, grandfather and father, who had returned to Britain, threatening them all with prison unless they revealed the child’s whereabouts.

Last week, the Spanish police arrived to seize the baby from its weeping mother’s arms, gabbling at her in Spanish, which she did not understand. The following day, an English-speaking Spanish court official explained that the baby was to be returned to Britain on the orders of the British social workers. The Spanish authorities, he said with tears in his eyes, had been powerless to refuse. The distraught mother contacted a London solicitor involved in the case of Joe and Marie, who, after making enquiries, was able to tell her an application for a care order on the child was to be heard next morning. The mother was told her baby was already on its way back to Britain, but that the case had been adjourned for a full hearing in the High Court this week.

This raises the question whether the Welsh social workers appear to have been acting in direct contravention of the principle of EU law upheld by that High Court judge in May, the five-month-old baby has never had ‘habitual residence’ anywhere but Spain. This week’s hearing could make legal history. Will the new judge follow his predecessor in upholding the principle that British courts have no jurisdiction over a child who has never lived in Britain? Or will that principle now be reversed?

There is a huge issue of law at stake, the implications of which go far beyond the plight of this one mother and child who have been so cruelly, and for no obvious good reason, torn apart.
CHRISTOPHER BOOKER—SUNDAY TELEGRAPH
——————————————————————————-
the leveller
Trusted
Hero Member
*****
 
Posts: 750
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

 Reply #2 on: September 11, 2012, 11:19:59 PM

http://www.bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/home/2012/09/a-serious-debate.html#.UEcnyP4ZaUJ.blogger
——————————————————————————–
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
 
Posts: 71
View Profile
 http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
 Email

Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

 Reply #3 on: September 12, 2012, 05:13:23 AM

Letter from Gloria Musa 5 Sept. from Holloway prison – see pics of the letter here:

https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2012/09/05/gloria-musa-5-sept-12/

 In it she states that she has seen a “Dr. REDACTED”  who gave her some imflammatory tablets, however she states she is still in great pain still and unable to leave the cell, and that also she cannot sleep at night and whats more is having panic attacks =
{qu.}”I saw Dr. REDACTED who prescribed inflammatory tablets to relieve the pain but im yet to see change yet, coupled with lacking sleep at night as i have to leave the light on, still having panic attacks more especially as the police gave evidence at their brutality to me at the hospital” {unqu.}.

 The full communication from Gloria is put here so as everybody – supporters and quislings alike can see it, removing of course the identity  the solicitors mentioned as 2 lots of solicitors have mysteriously declined recently from helping the Musas from formerly being enthusiastic about helping them. I believe somebody “put a spanner in the works” regarding this, and this behavior from solicitors has happened many times before with solicitors starting off on the right foot only to actively change after a short period of time. Is that not true solicitors Rajesh S., Paul K-W., Georgina C., Paul G., Ian J., C. in Harrow, plus others,…how do they sleep at night? And especially not forgetting the woman solicitor from Deptford who Sabine Mcneil arranged to visit Chiwar who charged £230 for “travel expenses” etc, travelling from Deptford to Pentonville – a distance of 3 miles or so – Chiwar telling her she was unsuitable on the day and bidding her farewell. I believe this entire visit by this character was a deliberate preplanned ploy to try and exhaust the Musas legal aid status by this outrageous charging by a solicitor who in Chiwars eyes was clearly not fit for the job – her name and the charge details stated here are on the recording of the call i made to her a couple of days after the event. With all the chopping and changing the Musas have been very lucky to retain their legal aid status at all – no thanks to the person who arranged the very expensive solicitor who added her outrageous figure to the legal aid bill yet did precisely nothing in return.
                                           ———————————

Sent by Royal Mail recorded delivery letter {twice} + and email to LORD MCNALLY, justice minister + K. CLARKE, sec of state for justice, 3 Sept. 2012: {LETTERS TILL NOT RECEIVED BACL AS OF 31 OCT 12}

https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2012/09/04/sent-by-rec-del-email-to-lord-mcnally-and-k-clarke-mp-3-sept-12/

For the attention of: the Minister of State, {and Deputy Leader of the House of Lords} –  the Rt. Hon. Lord McNally, and the Lord Chancellor, Secretary of State for Justice, the Rt. Hon. Mr. K. Clarke QC MP
 
Dear Lord McNally, and the Rt. Hon. Mr. K. Clarke,
I write to you today about very serious and grave miscarriages of justice that has happened in our high courts.  I have been notifying numerous MPs, including Mr. Pickles, Mr. Clarke and numerous others about the actions, or rather the criminal activities of X COUNCIL for some time, yet never have I received any kind of reply or even acknowledgement to my communications, by email and recorded delivery Royal Mail postal service. {update 11 Sept.  replies {pics below} from the IMB and Mr. N. Hardwick have now finally been received – the IMB, which says it is made up of ‘members of community’  is standard rhetoric – their letter begins ‘I have noted your observations but the IMB secretariat are not equipped to deal with personal circumstances of any individual unless they are unable to raise the issue themselves by application’ but then whichever ‘member of the community’ wrote this thing contradicts him/herself by stating {presumably about Glorias plight ‘They {IMB members} have also liased with the no. 1 governor regarding her case , and after receiving other letters and have had lengthy discussions’. Well make your mind up please. Either you are dealing with Gloria’s appalling mistreatment or your not. Either way not much is being done and Gloria should be in a hospital and getting proper medical treatment, not what is happening as no improvement is being shown – being in a cell and falling down and not being able to get up which she says has happened 8 times at least, and bleeding blood clots as Gloria has stated is happening still since giving birth on March 10 is simply not good enough. That is the gist of the letter from the IMB, whereas Mr. Hardwick simply gives an address to write to of yet another government department and the IPCC and says hes unable to deal with anything. Ms. Tysoe still has not replied at all}.
 

This council has removed 7 children from the Nigerian visitors here CHIWAR and GLORIA MUSA and this family has been subjected to the most gross irregularities that could befall a family – performed by personnel within X council who removed 7 children from these parents over a 2 and a half year period.
 
A 6 week trial during May and June 2012 saw these innocent parents subjected to a sentence of SEVEN years – the end result of a farcical, one-sided and very biased trial, presided over by a judge who performed great failings throughout the trial.

We have it from good authority from a whistleblower also at the court the trial was heard at  Z Crown in North London, that the jury was not chosen as it should have been, but rather it was rigged.
 

The entire case needs an honest and thorough investigation by honest parties, and I speak as one who has been closely involved in the case since April 2011, having attended many court hearings, some as a Mckenzie friend  particularly during a fact-finding hearing held at the Royal Courts of Justice beginning Oct. 31 until Nov. 6 2011, presided over by Sir Nicholas Wall. The entire 6 day hearing there was a farce, the Nigerian parents had no legal representation at all and little factual information came out during the hearing – medical records were missing {and remained missing even throughout the trial months later}, the legal bundle had been altered with items removed or the wording changed and tampered with and all sorts of irregularities took place during the hearing so as a certain result could be achieved & and was!!  The truth about more or less everything in this case has been twisted and altered out of all proportion to the actual truth & so as to conveniently admonish each and every participant who conspired with others to pervert the course of justice throughout this case ? from the solicitors involved, to the police, judiciary, social workers and a whole lot more.

Please use your powers to bring an honest thorough investigation regarding this shocking case. 7 children have been removed from their parents of the most fake of allegations & and as if that wasnt enough situations and falsehoods were manufactured by certain characters to compound the completely false case & the children brainwashed and coaxed into saying things they never would under normal circumstances & all to cover up the irregularities of most dubious social workers in the land, who are not fit to be employed by anybody & those employed by Haringey council,in my humble opinion..
I have no reason to lie or make anything up regarding anything to do with this case – I simply feel it is so wrong what has happened, and I ask you please to look at the attatched notes. Much didnt come out in court, {or wasnt allowed to} due to a pathetically incompetant defence team who played right into the hands of the prosecution and all they stood for. Much vital evidence was deliberately ignored and not brought into the trial, the entire thing was a farce. There is so much that needs to come out regarding this entire case, such as the witness intimidation that existed at the beginning of the case but was never mentioned, and the sexual abuse suffered by the eldest child, then 9 years of age when taken into care on April 8 2010. All has been conveniently hushed up and not mentioned during the trial, gross irregularities.

Now 2 innocent parents have been given 7 year sentences on the basis of a pack of untruths, and 7 children have lost their true parents. It is a disgrace.

Whilst on remand in prison awaiting her trial, and since whilst beginning her sentence, Gloria Musa has been treated completely appallingly, and illegally I might add. I have written numerous times along with others to the Governor of Holloway prison {a recent example below}, and also to various authorities but have never received any replies about the shocking treatment she is being given. My message to the Independant Monitoring Board {below} has still not been answered, and it is disgraceful the Prisons dept. under the guises of Mr. Hardwick and Ms. Tysoe {Prison Healthcare} have not answered my communications they have been sent regarding the appalling treatment Ms. Musa has received since she has been in Holloway prison since Nov. 28th 2011. She has been denied medical treatment for serious ailments, and denied visits when weve gone to visit her to deliberately keep certain things covered up, and a whole lot more.
What is happening to her in Holloway prison is a public scandal.

Please help and let the truth come out about this horrific case.

Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,
 
J. Graham
 
Mckenzie friend to the Musa family, and concerned citizen.
                                 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

This below was sent to the Independant Monitoring Board,  and Mr. Hardwick and Ms. Tysoe of the Prisons Dept. and Healthcare respectively – see full article + full pics of repliy letters recd. here {but not from Tysoe of “Prisons Healthcare}: .https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2012/09/04/sent-by-rec-del-email-to-lord-mcnally-and-k-clarke-mp-3-sept-12/

 To: as stated above
 Ashley House 2 Monck Street London SW1P 2BQ
 
From: J. Graham   supporter, and Mckenzie friend to the Musa family and concerned citizen.
 
 August 24  2012
 
Dear Ms. Elizabeth Tysoe, Mr. N. Hardwick, and whom it may concern at the Independant Monitoring Board,
 
I am writing to you concerning a shocking situation and an abuse of power by prison employes paid to know and act better regarding the mistreatment of a female prisoner in Holloway prison by the name of Ms. Gloria Musa, no A2767CJ. Helen, an erstwile and devoted Musa family supporter reports that Gloria Musa, the unjustly imprisoned Nigerian mother and prisoner had called her today Thursday 23rd August by telephone from Holloway prison where she is being denied medical treatment for serious conditions, and has been for about 10 months since her entry into the prison. Gloria has recently begun a 7 year sentence after already serving 259 days on remand there.
 
Gloria Musa has told of how she was attacked by countless police officers at 3am in the morning whilst breastfeeding her newborn baby in a side cubicle in a London hospital, in June 2010,  the police allegedly attacking her so badly whilst removing her baby that she still is suffering the damaging effects to this very day over 2 years later, and is being refused medical treatment still in Holloway as she has been since November 28th 2011 ? the day she was remanded in custody there on the most questionable of charges. Gloria told Helen she fell earlier in the day in her cell in Holloway prison and was in much pain and couldnt get up, and also she wet herself and was much humiliated by it all. She says she has been bleeding blood clots for weeks too after giving birth to her new baby on March 10 2012 – some 22 weeks ago and has been denied any kind of medical treatment to remedy the situation. After falling her cellmate got the warders who helped Gloria up and took her to the medical room and gave her a couple of paracetamol to ease the pain. It is outrageous that nothing has ever been done in the 10 months of her being in prison for the ailments she has.
 
Many times the authorities have been notified and complained to about the situation – a typical communication is below – but nothing is ever done about Gloria Musa’s ailments – indeed, our communications have never even been acknowledged let alone replied to by the characters that have been notified – MPs included. It is a truly disgraceful situation and the people written to dont care at all if any permanent damage is done through the lack of medical treatment regarding the ailments Gloria Musa is suffering. Why do they not take her to the hospital and give her proper medical treatment? No wonder they refused to find a wheelchair for her on the 12th August to bring her for our visit – if she had come she would’ve told us of her dire medical situation again and the refusal of the prison to give her the medical treatment that she is entitled to. As Gloria could be classed as a ‘difficult prisoner’ in the authorities eyes this is how they retaliate – by making her life as miserable and painful as possible.
 
What an absolute disgrace!

Authorities have been told for months and the prison too about the situation but they deliberatly ignore the situation to add insult to injury. Gloria said when a probation officer came a couple of weeks ago – a Martin Wagner – to interview her they found a wheelchair straightaway to take her to the meeting. Remember on the Sunday 12th Aug when they refused to bring Gloria to the visiting hall the prison warder – officer HY601 – blatantly lied and said there were ‘no wheelchairs in the prison’ while the warders superior in a suit 5 yards away in the visiting hall – a Mr. ATTARD – said that there were indeed wheelchairs in the prison – contradicting the officer HY601’s obvious lie. Why didnt they get one to bring Gloria to the visit? They had 5 days notice of the visit to find one as the visit was arranged on the preceeding Tuesday 5 days earlier, and also on the 9th Aug – the Thursday – i sent the letter {below} to the Governor complaining about the awful lack of treatment Gloria has been denied for 10 months now at this prison.
 
What if permanent damage is done to Glorias knee or hip? Nobody in the prison cares about that whatsoever!
 
Please help this lady.
 
Thank you very much.
J. Graham

Full article+ full size pics of the letters below: https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2012/09/04/sent-by-rec-del-email-to-lord-mcnally-and-k-clarke-mp-3-sept-12/

——————————————————————————–
the leveller
Trusted
Hero Member
*****
 
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

– Reply #4 on: September 12, 2012, 10:01:23 PM –

HAVE YOU TRIED ANY OF THE ORGANISATIONS LISTED HERE BUTLINCAT ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_abduction

——————————————————————————–
 the leveller
Trusted
Hero Member
*****
re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

– Reply #5 on: September 12, 2012, 10:17:04 PM –

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/children-in-care-go-missing-warn-trafficking-experts-8129780.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19566617

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13440736

 ——————————————————————————-
 
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

– Reply #6 on: September 20, 2012, 12:57:28 PM –

quote from: the leveller on September 12, 2012, 10:01:23 PM

HAVE YOU TRIED ANY OF THE ORGANISATIONS LISTED HERE BUTLINCAT ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_abduction

We have been to numerous agencies sending complaints about the state of the contact visits with the children, as descibed in articles viz. the Musa parents would go on a prearranged visit, as decreed by the court, only for, on many occasions only some of the children to be brought to the visit, if at all. The Musa parents would often spend all day getting to and from the visit centre, and the entire thing would be a waste of time. The agencies contacted were mostly in the UK – and only one reply ever received back, which is below too, – addresses being:

“And a letter to the foster agencies of the UK:
From: butlincat . (adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk)

Sent:  08 June 2011 11:19:48

 
To:  contactus@thefca.co.uk;
 
enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk; mail@baaf.org.uk; advice@frg.org.uk; helpdesk@adoptionuk.org.uk; duty@capstonevision.co.uk,
 lammyd@parliament.uk; mayt@parliament.uk; hc@nigeriahc.org.uk; infodesk@ohchr.org; publishing@echr.coe.int; dilek.dogus@haringey.gov.uk; lorna.reith@haringey.gov.uk;

————————————————————————————————-
From: Contact.Us@thefca.co.uk
To: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:58:10 +0100
Subject: your complaint.

With reference to your complaint I regret that we are unable to assist you. Please contact the local authority and make your complaint to them. They will have a complaints proceedure in place.
 
Kind Regards
Contact Us”
———————————————————————————-

butlincat
Moderator
*****
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

– Reply #7 on: September 22, 2012, 05:51:12 PM –
UPDATE 26 SEPT. 12 – We received a message from Gloria earlier this week and it is understood Gloria has ceased taking the medication she was being given and is feeling much better as a result.

7/09/2012 20:07, butlincat . wrote:

“On the 16 Sept. Sunday 15.30 gmt we – H and I – visited Gloria at Holloway prison.
 
1}  Gloria was in good spirits mostly but swayed into being near tears at times and the main points I wish to forward are these below. I hope Helen will confirm anything if anything is doubtful.

2}  Gloria said she is experiencing panic attacks still from when the police at the trial described their what many people say is appalling mistreatment of her.
She said after at least 7 police officers had entered her single cubilcle at the hospital at one point there were 2 officers sitting each on seperate legs whilst a third was strangling her. She said she was seriously choking and had stopped breathing and believes this was a deliberate attempt on her life. Photographs exist of wounds Gloria sustained during this episode.

 The baby having been removed from Gloria did not thrive over the 4 months gone and became quite unwell – so much so that she was returned to Gloria. The baby didnt take long to get back to her happy normal self. Then 7 or so months later on the 28th June 2011 the baby was removed again via an Emergency Protection Order after the Musa parents had taken the baby to St. Thonas’s hospital, London because she seemed to the parents to be unwell and running a temperature. Once at the hospital xxxxx arrived up after the council were called. xxxx was the top man – and Gloria felt it strange he should turn up at all.

   After a 6 day factfinding hearing beginning Oct 31 at the Royal Courts of Justice  it was deemed by a ‘balance of probabilities’ that the Musas had mistreated their baby which resulted in her being taken to the hospital on June 28 2011. The Musas had no legal representation throughout the  6 day hearing.For such an important hearing to be allowed to happen at all when the  ‘defendants’ had no legal representation whatsoever was surely highly irregular. Later the Musa parents were to receive 7 years imprisonment each for supposedly ‘mistreating their children’ after a ‘6 week trial’.
 
3} Gloria yesterday also spoke of acute pain in her knee, hip, back and arm – her arm from falling down at least 8 times. A new ailment has begun being she has now something wrong with her left eye. She described it as being ‘painful’ and her sight is affected and says it could be a result of one or more or a combination of 5 different drugs she is now being given as it wasnt happening before the drugs were introduced. She has fallen down over 8 times recently, and cannot get up once she has fallen and needs assistance to get up. She tells us she was left for 2 hours on the cell floor recently after falling down in the middle of the night – not getting any help to get up from the prison warders. Being in acute pain as she describes, and bleeding still from giving birth one wonders why she isnt getting proper treatment in a hospital, and having proper x-rays and blood and other tests done? This we have been trying for for over 10 months since Gloria first complained about her knee – damaged as a result of police action even they described during the ytrial when it was such tat jury members and public gallery members were reduced to tears. Being given drugs and not being told the names, as Gloria relates, is illegal. Surely on certain drugs one could go insane. Surely we must be careful Gloria is not pronounced mentally incapable or ill etc etc and sectioned off to a mental prison or similar, never to be seen again!
 
She understands she is being given a painkiller, but the name of this drug and the names of the other 4 being given are not forthcoming and Gloria says the prison refuse to tell her the names of the medications. This is surely highly questionable as surely one is allowed to know the names of the drugs one is being told to take, even if one is imprisoned. Still there have been no x-rays on her knee or anywhere to determine if her knee is actually broken. Also she has been bleeding internally constantly since giving birth to her baby on March 10 this year – for which there have been no proper medical examinations carried out,  or blood tests done – which must surely be far from the norm in a situation whereby someone is bleeding constantly.

4} Gloria told us that she had received a letter from a certain person on Thursday 11 September 2012 stating that the Musas legal aid “had run out” regarding representation by her defence team. Whether this is true or not or a fabrication  remains to be seen. Where the Musas stand now with supposedly 2 appeals underway – against conviction and sentencing – can only be imagined. Since when do legal representatives tell a member of the public things like that to tell the clients of the legal reps? Why have they not told the Musas themselves and why hasnt any lof the 3 legal representatives visited them since the conviction date of 14th August 2012 when the Musas received 7 years imprisonment on a charge of mistreating their children – something they did not do. The present legal team rarely visit either Musa. {update 22 Sept. – it is claimed one of the defence legal team did visit Gloria but this has yet to be confirmed}.

The amount of irregularities and anomalies in this case are such that an honest investigation needs to take place as soon as possible.

5} Gloria told us that she had not seen the numerous emails sent  via the “emailaprisoner” service in recent weeks.

7} Gloria told us  the reason she was not permitted to join the 3 supporters who tried to visit her on the 12 Aug. 2012 but were denied the visit because Gloria was not brought was because a particularly hostile female senior officer was on duty and was behind her deliberately not being given assistance to attend the visit. Gloria told us of apparently other hostile acts towards her have occurred by this person which I will not go into here.

Finally it is good that 4 visitors did not go to the prison for the visit as was tentatively arranged. Luckily 2 persons changed their minds at the last minute. 4 people arent allowed on a visit – only 3 are – but here is just 2 excerpts of the recording with the prison visits officer lieing and deliberately arranging for a 4th person to attend the visit – which he knows ISNT ALLOWED =

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=1180686de69bc0900c9943e&skin_id=1602&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

I asked repeatedy could 4 people go on a visit = = he replied in the affirmative each time and duly took the 4th name. When at the prison I asked a visits officer about the number allowed he said THREE ONLY. Another blatant lie told us regarding 4 visitors being allowed on a visit. We have been lied to many times and I have travelled before for a prearranged visit only to find out no such visit exists and is listed. It was then I bought a recording device which has proved extremely valuable when ive been able to prove a visit had been arranged when ive arrived at the prison for a visit only to be told one hadnt been arranged. Others have experienced the same irregularity and have been denied their visit when it had been absolutelly properly arranged. The prison simply does not reply to 99% of communications sent to them, of course, as havent scores of other departments and authority figures written to by numerous Musa supporters, including Mr. Martin Baker. Chief Constable of Dorset police, who refused to reply when I wrote notifying him of sexual abuse suffered by X1 Musa during the early part of her being placed in a care home after being removed from her parents on April 8 2010. I sent at least a total of 3 emails to Mr. Baker about this serious sexual crime upon a minor, but my emails were blocked after the 1st one sent, but I had already sent letters via recorded delivery Royal Mail. After my 2nd email to Mr. Baker was returned undelivered further emails were sent via Dorchester police HQ asking they be forwarded to Mr. Baker as CC. Nothing has ever been received back from anybody regarding this, but Mr. Baker has resigned {though of course not necessarily connected to anything written here – http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-19523330 

That is the gist of yesterdays visit with Gloria.
 
                                 —————————————-
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

– Reply #8 on: September 26, 2012, 04:18:27 PM –

  Yet another year rolls around and another anti-child abuse rally will take place in London on September 29 at Trafalgar Square, from 1.pm until 4 pm

Organised by: http://www.truthandhope.co.uk

 Home
  UK END CHILD ABUSE RALLY
  Our Fundraising Events
  Support Group Events
  State Endorsed Paedophilia
  SRE Parental Awareness Campaign
  Global Child Abuse Issues
  Support Our Cause
  Contact us

see full size pic @:  http://www.truthandhope.co.uk/london-2012.html

from David Icke:

http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/36895-uk-rally-against-child-abuse-trafalgar-square-london-saturday-august-7th-

Physical, emotional & sexual abuse – paedophilia & incest – exploitation -family court corruption – institutional, systematic & ritual abuse.

The UK Rally Against Child Abuse is an opportunity for people from all walks of life to join toge

Modify message

« Last Edit: October 20, 2013, 03:22:09 AM by butlincat »

 Report to moderator    46.165.210.17
——————————————————————————–

Posts on this forum are made by members and remian here in good faith. Any post you feel is illegal, libelous, defamortay or in anyway upsetting.
Please report it asap. The owner of this site takes no responsibility for the actions of others wishing to exercise their freedom of speach.

my blog http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com
my blog: http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
facebook: http://www.facebook.com
youtube: http://www.youtube.com/butlincat6

——————————————————————————–
 

Argos

——————————————————————————–
 

butlincat
Trusted
*****
 
Posts: 99
View Profile
 http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
 Email
 Personal Message (Online)
 

Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2013, 04:30:03 PM »

Quote
 Modify
 
——————————————————————————–
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

? Reply #9 on: September 27, 2012, 07:37:33 PM ?

X MUSA IS SIX TODAY!!!  HAPPY BIRTHDAY  X!!!  {gag orders with threats of imprisonment stop any public naming or anything to do with any of the Musa children}

 
——————————————————————————–
 
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

? Reply #10 on: September 28, 2012, 08:17:47 PM ?

PRESIDENT OF THE SECRET FAMILY COURT SIR NICHOLAS WALL RETIRES

“President of the Family Division, Sir Nicholas Wall, retires   by Natasha

The Ministry of Justice have just this moment notified its readers of the news that Sir Nicholas Wall, the current President of the Family Division is to retire on the 1st December, 2012 ( this year), on grounds of ill-health.

Working within the confines of the courts and the limits of the law, Sir Nicholas was one of the more outspoken judges of his time and certainly pioneered radical discussion on increasing rights for unmarried couples, implementing no-fault divorce and more access to the family courts through media reporting to help increase transparency inside the system. He was also kind enough to take time out of his busy schedule to be a panel member for our Westminster Debate for KIDS.

  We will be sorry to see him leave and wish him a quick recovery. However, the question which remains, is who will take Sir Nicholas’s place, as the new President of the Family Division?”

PLEASE NOTE THIS VIEW IS NOT SHARED BY MANY MOTHERS I HAVE SPOKEN TO WHO HAVE HAD THE MISFORTUNE TO BE ON THE RECEIVING END OF THIS TYPE OF JUSTICE! – AND WHAT HAPPENED TO THE MUSA FAMILY IS A PUBLIC SCANDAL THAT NEEDS A PROPER HONEST INVESTIGATION BY NEUTRAL HONEST PARTIES!!

Natasha | September 28, 2012 at 4:42 pm | Categories: Family Law |

URL:   http://wp.me/pzLid-Nm http://researchingreform.wordpress.com/2012/09/28/president-of-the-family-division-sir-nicholas-wall-retires/
————————————————-

From the “Sunday Telegraph” by Christopher Booker:

30 10 2011 – Christopher Booker

Lord Justice Wall takes on an alarming child-snatching case

This seems to be a classic instance of the way social workers make a crashing initial mistake, then add ever more questionable allegations to defend their blunder.   A mother and her daughter have been fighting a care order Photo: ALAMY By Christopher Booker 7:00PM BST 29 Oct 2011 In the child-snatching story that I have reported on here most often, the latest twists are as disturbing as anything that has gone before. The case has been taken over by Lord Justice Wall, the President of the Family Division. It is a classic instance of how, when social workers seize children on the basis of what appears to be a crashing initial mistake, they then seem to make ever more questionable allegations against the parents to defend their original blunder.

On June 27, a year-old baby that had been torn from its mother?s arms at birth (but was later returned to the couple on a judge?s orders) developed a fever. When the parents took the baby to hospital for medical advice, the staff contacted social workers, who called in the police on an allegation that the parents had drugged the baby with opium. The parents were arrested and held in a police cell for 27 hours. The baby was taken back into care.

This month, I am told, the police announced that no charges would be brought against the couple, lab tests having shown no trace of any drugs. The social workers had apparently known this for weeks. Meanwhile, they asked the police to arrest the couple on a charge of conspiracy to abduct their other five children from foster homes and take them abroad. The parents had no idea where their children were, having not seen them for many months. Again, it seems, no charges are to be brought, because there was no evidence.

Despite an order by Lord Justice Wall that the parents must again be given regular contact with their children, his order has, I gather, been ignored. There is much in this alarming case for the learned judge to investigate.

For legal reasons, comments have been disabled on this story.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8857570/Lord-Justice-Wall-takes-on-an-alarming-child-snatching-case.html
 ———————————————————————-

Statement of Gloria Musa for the High Court;21/7/2011

1:-My name is Gloria Musa.My husband Chiwar and I have six {update: as of March 10 2012 there are 7 children upon the birth of X7 in Holloway prison – ed}  children who have never been ill or in hospital before the intervention of X councils social services, X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, + X7.

I am of Nigerian nationality and a respected evangelist preacher and bishop,author of many books and my sermons can be found on DVDs on line including one preached to a large congregation at the Hilton Metropole hotel in London.I was a virgin when I married and in accordance with my strict Christian beliefs I have never had sexual relations with any man other than my husband.We are visitors in this country and our dearest wish is to return to Nigeria with our 6 children to live a normal family life in an African culture.We would all leave immediately if permitted.
 2:-The reason given at the time for taking away my children in April 2010 was a letter found in the garden allegedly written by X1 (then aged 9) saying that I was a cruel mother who beat her without mercy.This letter was written in an adult hand that bore absolutely no resemblance to X1’s writing in her school exercise book but Judge Brasse refused to look at my evidence so that the handwriting could be compared ,refused to look at the graphologist report confirming that X1 was not the author of the letter,saying that it did not matter as “we have gone beyond that”.With respect the judge erred as if X1 did not write the letter then the person who did forge her signature also perverted the course of justice and the matter should have been investigated.
 3:-It was a terrible shock in April 2010 that my 5 younger children were taken away with no prior warning by police and social workers whilst I was still pregnant with my youngest X6.
 Originally when the children were taken X local authority applied for an interim care order, Judge Brasse heard the barrister for the local authority state as a fact that I was a sex worker (I was not allowed to speak in order to either question the barrister or deny the allegations). ,that I had been abused in childhood and taken drugs , that the children were multiparented and had been traffiked into the country and would entail jail sentences for those responsible.Judge Brasse in answer to my denials of all this promised rather sceptically that if I produced my medical records and dna results to prove my denials true that was all I needed to do.I assumed that he mean’t that I would then have my children returned.
 4:-DNA proved all six were mine and my husband’s my medical records showed a normal happy drugfree and uneventful childhood ,and the care assistant who wrongly and illegally described herself as a social worker admitted she had no evidence of sex working other than that “she ticked all the boxes as she never claimed benefits”She made several enquiries from parents at my children’s school asking if they knew I was a sex worker causing uproar,dismay,and a lot of bad publicity.The lack of evidence was recorded on a court document that was sent to me by Haringey inadvertently !.Judge Brasse then studied reports made by social workers and other documents handed in by them which I was not allowed to see ! Surely denying me a fair hearing contrary to my human rights.Judge Brasse at a later hearing did not keep his promise ,and it was only just before the fact finding hearings in February 2011 that allegations of child beatings on all five elder children were made against me purely on hearsay to justify the further care orders being put in place;I was refused permission by judge Brasse to question Joyce the allotted social worker at that time and refused permission to play a recording that would have proved conclusively that she had lied under oath.Surely contrary to my human right right to a fair hearing.?
 5:-When my 6th child , X6 was born,8 police came into the hospital with two social workers after 3am ,4 hours after the baby was born and seized my baby by force waking up other mothers in the ward . I was badly bruised when this took place perhaps because I shouted that I would resist until they showed me a court order which they did not.With such an uproar the affair was put very much in the public domain by those who witnessed it.Judge Brasse refused to consider the unecessary taking of my child at the instance of X council but blamed me for the bad publicity! Surely he should have considered this evidence when judging my behaviour against that of X council?
 6:- Some months later my baby who was continually ill in care was returned to me where she thrived,proving surely that if I was no danger to a helpless baby then I was was surely no danger to my older children who judge Brasse had ordered to be fostered in London .They were in fact fostered in Dartford via Capstone Fostering agency.Judge Brasse refused to enforce his own order leaving me to carry my baby plus food for the children to contact vie bus from my flat to seven sisters tube,then on to London bridge station ,from there to Dartford,and then Taxi to the contact centre.All this was 3 or 4 times a week at my own expense as the only time X council gave us two tickets we did not notice  they were singles so my husband and I were both fined ?50 on the return journey !Judge Brasse refused to believe X council had not provided financial help, calling me a liar and refused to allow social workers to be questioned on that point.
 .7:- Despite the fact that the independent social worker and the psychiatrist both reported to me that X1 aged 10 wanted to see her mother,I have been denied contact face to face and by telephone,I have not seen or heard from my daughter for nearly a year; Social workers informed me that they had changed her name to “Y”,. When the children’s grandparents came from Africa to see her and her aunt came from the USA both were denied access. Even X1’s siblings told me they had not seen her at all this year.
 Judge Brasse ignored the fact that in August 2010 X1 had alleged sexual abuse by the son of her foster family and asked as a present for her birthday a diary with a lock on it so that she could record her secret thoughts; Judge Brasse decided instead to deprive her of all contact with her parents ;He refused me permission to telephone to say happy birthday and later happy Xmas nothing more than two words and supervised to boot..This neglect to enquire into a possible crime but instead to sequester the complaining child from that day forward was surely illegal or at least contrary to goog legal practice?
 Her workbook produced by the independent social worker late last year revealed her answer to  the exercise titled”your thoughts” when she chose to ring “fed up”,”pressured” and “angry”
 8:- I and Chiwar share parental responsibility for all our children and therefore have the right to see medical records and school reports for all of them but these have been consistently refused both by social workers and by judge Brasse since the children were taken in April 2010.Surely the judge erred in this?
 9-The ABE police video made when the children were taken shows all 5 older children denying that they were ever beaten or struck with implements by their parents.This video has been illegally witheld from evidence with judge Brasse’s consent, and apart from a letter “found” in a garden purporting to have been written by X1 in a handwriting in no way resembling her own ,no written or verbal evidence from the children themselves alleging beatings or showing any marks has ever been presented.The children themselves could have cleared up the matter by coming to court as all clamoured to come home at contact and all 4 still allowed to see me said they had been told to say they had been beaten otherwise contact would be stopped ,which it now has been ! Their right to make their views known and to testify if competent  was denied them contrary to the UN Declaration of Children’s Rights and also to a recent Supreme court decision W(children) 2010.
 Instead social workers said the children admitted to being beaten and their hearsay evidence was preferred by judge Brasse to the live evidence on the police video of the children’s own words ! To find as fact that the children were ill treated on hearsay evidence when photographs of happy well dressed children with their parents and the childrens own denials were disregarded surely shows that the judge erred,
 .10:-Recently a health visitor gave the baby “X6” a normal injection against childish ailments that resulted in giving the baby a high temperature (not unusual)  When to be on the safe side I took her to hospital I was accused of feeding her opium and police prevented me from approaching the baby even after discharge from hospital when it was shown that no traces of drugs of any kind were found in the blood of the baby or us her parents.Despite this the child has not been returned but has been witheld illegally since no theshold has been crossed given the mistaken belief in opium poisining and the inadvertent abuse of the baby by the hospital who at the insistence of social workers that the baby was suffering from opium poisoning gave her large doses of an antidote which made the child very ill indeed before she was finally discharged and fostered.
 11:-I am representing myself with (I hope!) the assistance of a Mckenzie friend because every solicitor that has acted for me or been consulted by me has insisted that the only way to regain my children would be for me to accept all the allegations of X council that I am a prostitute,a drug user,and a child beater but apart from the absurd slur on my character this would be perjury and having sworn to tell the truth I shall continue to do exactly that in all circumstances
 12:-The most worrying aspect of this affair is the immediate sequestration of X6 following her complaint of sexual abuse by 19 year old R (son of the fosterers) .My other children reported that she had been seen by police and also by a psychiatrist,but even X3 with whom she shared a foster family stated that she had not seen X1 since Xmas and neither had the other children;
 Contact with all five elder children was stopped with no reason two months ago and I have had no contact with X6 ,my baby since she was taken for the second time.
 Judge Brasse refused to consider any of this and forced me under duress of “consequences” to sign an agreement not to approach X1’s foster family or school. Surely he erred in doing this without any kind of investigation as to X1’s circumstances given her”disappearance” following her protest of sexual abuse Surely his refusal to allow  even a supervised telephone call to say “happy Xmas”and refusal to allow access to granparents,aunt,and even the high commissioner for Sierra Leone (a friend) was contrary to the children’s act 1989 giving priority to uniting families not destroying them?
 There have been allegations that I wildly accuse all those involved of “grand design” and Conspiracies” when in fact it is very obvious that Haringey and his honour judge Brasse have made several very serious errors and are anxious to cover them up to justify their actions rather than admit them or to put matters right.A very human and very common failing.
 I hope my Lord that you will put matters right and at the very least order some form of supervised contact with X1 as

 I DO NOT KNOW IF SHE IS ALIVE OR DEAD.

Signed……………………                 Date……………………

——————————————————————————-
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

? Reply #11 on: October 01, 2012, 04:36:43 AM ?

The UK RALLY AGAINST CHILD ABUSE LONDON 29 SEPT 2012 

VIDEO 64 MINS.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=xCGVlZVzuFk
——————————————————————————–
 
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
 Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

? Reply #12 on: October 12, 2012, 11:37:07 AM ?

Affadavit from Gloria Musa’s mother proving Gloria is of Nigerian nationality  

– for full view go here:

    https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2012/10/12/affadavit-from-glorias-mother/

——————————————————————————-
 
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
 
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

? Reply #14 on: October 14, 2012, 07:15:28 AM ?

 From “The Sunday Telegraph” – the Musa case is towards the bottom of the article “Parents who lost their six children”

“The worst scandal I have seen in my 50-year career

By Christopher Booker
 13 Oct 2012

Our ‘child protection’ system is severely dysfunctional, but it has not come to the centre of national attention because it hides its workings behind a veil of secrecy
 
One mother had her child taken away after falling out of a window and becoming temporarily paralysed. Social workers portrayed it as a suicide bid, and her as an alcoholic and a drug addict
 
Scarcely a week goes by without more evidence emerging to indicate that our ?child protection? system is so dysfunctional that it should be looked on as a major national scandal. On one hand, we see the number of applications by social workers to take children into care soaring to nearly 1,000 a month, having more than doubled in the four years since the tragedy of Baby P. On the other, we hear of horrific episodes, like those recently reported from Rochdale and Rotherham, where social workers and police turned a blind eye to the systematic mass-rape of underage girls, many themselves in state care.

For three years I have been investigating scores of cases of children seized from their parents for what appear to be quite absurd reasons. This outrage has not yet come to the centre of national attention only because our child protection system hides its workings behind a veil of secrecy. I have been amazed to discover how our family courts routinely turn all the cherished principles of British justice upside down. The most bizarre allegations, based on hearsay, can be levelled against parents who are then denied the right to challenge them.

Although I have reported on several such cases more than once, they drag on through the courts so long that I haven?t been able to explain how they ended. I summarise three of them here to indicate why this is the most disturbing story I have covered in all my years as a journalist.
The fateful fall

Related Articles
Slovaks protest at Britain’s ‘illegal child snatching?
22 Sep 2012
Don?t ask your grandson how his jaw got broken
01 Sep 2012
Vicky Haigh is freed – despite telling her story to the press
18 Aug 2012
Police won?t return an innocent girl?s laptop
11 Aug 2012
A teetotaller branded as ‘alcoholic’ loses her child
04 Aug 2012

My first case centres on a mother who, five months after the birth of her daughter, fell from a first-floor window. Lying in hospital, temporarily paralysed from the neck down, she took a call from a social worker who told her that her baby was being taken into care. Although no one had suggested that her fall was anything other than an accident, the social workers made out that it was a suicide bid and that she was an alcoholic and a drug addict. A psychiatric report and clinical tests found that none of these accusations were true.

The mother had to make a weekly 80-mile round trip to have ?supervised contact? with her daughter. The contact supervisor wrote glowing reports on how closely they seemed to be bonded. But when, at a case conference, a social worker was challenged by the supervisor for having excised any references to this from her reports, it was the supervisor the council suspended. After a succession of hearings at which, I gather, the judge became increasingly impatient with the social workers for their sloppy handling of paperwork and repeated requests for adjournments, it seemed the case was going the mother?s way. Her wish for her daughter to be returned to her was supported by the child?s ?guardian? (an official appointed by the court to represent the child?s interests).

But then, for no clear reason, fortune swung back the other way. Two years after the case began, the judge ruled that the child should be sent for adoption. As the mother made a final plea to the Appeal Court, a lurid report in the local paper repeated all the original claims of the social workers: that the mother was an alcoholic, a drug addict and had tried to commit suicide. A family friend tells me she witnessed the distraught mother being allowed a ?goodbye session? with her daughter, the centre of her life for three years, whom she will never be allowed to see again.

The runaways

My second case centres on a mother who fled to Ireland with her teenage son because social workers had been making enquiries about them, due to the fact that the father, who had been out of their lives for six years, was an alcoholic prone to violence. When they had been happily settled in their new home for six months, with the boy doing well at school, British social workers brought the father to Ireland and persuaded an Irish judge, on evidence that mother and son were not allowed to see, to order the boy?s deportation back to England. He was so depressed that he attempted suicide. (I spoke to the boy in hospital shortly afterwards).

After being taken to England, the boy was placed in foster care, where he managed repeatedly to convey to his mother that he was desperately unhappy. Although bright, he was initially sent to a special needs school, where he was bullied for being so different from the others. He was denied the right to attend court to express his wishes, in contravention of the UN Convention on Children?s Rights. Neither he nor the mother had anyone to speak up for them and, although there is no evidence that she ever harmed her son, it was ruled that he must remain in foster care until he is 18 (normally, children are released from care when they are 16). The mother continues to work in Ireland, denied any further contact with her son until he is old enough to return to her.

Parents who lost their six children

My third case is the strangest and most disturbing of any I have covered. I first came to it shortly after the mother of a large family had given birth to her sixth child. Her new baby had been torn from her arms in a hospital bed by six policemen and three social workers just three hours after the birth. Three months earlier, the social workers had removed five older children from the family home in the belief that the mother was a ?sex worker? engaged in child trafficking with her husband, whom they claimed was not the father of any of the children. The social workers also had a letter, allegedly written by one of the children, claiming that her mother had beaten her.

What made all this particularly odd was that, one by one, these claims seemed to crumble. DNA tests showed that the children all came from the husband. The letter was in a different hand from that of the child supposed to have written it, but no graphological tests were allowed and it was eventually admitted that the letter had been ?destroyed?.

For a time, the parents were allowed occasional supervised contact with their children, although for this they had to travel for four hours. The oldest child claimed at one meeting that she had been sexually interfered with in her foster home ? after which she was never allowed to see her parents again.

But the case against them began to seem so flimsy that the baby was returned to them. However, they subsequently took the baby to a hospital to ask for advice on a puzzling complaint. A junior doctor carried out blood tests which apparently showed nothing amiss, but when the family?s name came up on a computer, the social workers were summoned. More tests were carried out, the parents were accused of giving their child a dangerous drug and the baby was again taken into care.

Events then took a still more serious turn. The couple were arrested, accused of planning to abduct their older children (even though they had no idea where they were) and fly them abroad in a private plane. They were sent to prison on remand, while a long list of further charges was compiled, ranging from physical abuse of their children to a claim that they had sought to kill the baby.

At their trial, 44 prosecution witnesses were called. Only two were allowed for the defence. The children spoke on video link, but their parents were not allowed to question them. The parents were given long prison sentences and a family court then ruled that the children must all be sent for adoption.

However odd all this may seem, I know enough about this family, and a story I have followed since 2010, to believe that it represents a travesty of justice which says much about what our child protection system has become.

 >> source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/9606161/The-worst-scandal-I-have-seen-in-my-50-year-career.html
——————————————————————————–
 
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
  re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

? Reply #15 on: October 18, 2012, 06:11:33 PM ?
Please see “Messages to a Chief Constable regarding the sexual abuse on a Minor” =

 http://truth-wars.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=245.msg373#msg373

 …b.
——————————————————————————–
 

butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

? Reply #16 on: October 20, 2012, 09:57:19 AM ?

CHIWAR?S LETTER FROM PENTONVILLE 17 OCT. 12

I got a letter from Chiwar today {17 Oct.} from Pentonville prison mentioning being ?peaceful?- a bit odd i thought in the circumstances and not needing to be said  as we cant go around as some have. 

Anyway it is THEM that use violence ? mental and emotional violence ? acute physical violence was used against Gloria by at least 5 policemen and 3 social workers in the middle of the night 3 hours after she gave birth to her baby X6 in a hospital in the summer of 2010 ? her injuries from then have got progressively worse from then and now she cannot walk without crutches or a wheelchair {which has been denied her when weve tried to visit her in prison, so the visit couldnt take place ? see the above post about the Aug. 12 2012 aborted visit to Gloria then} – and the mental violence this family has had to suffer from certain ?authorities? is blatantly shocking ? like not being allowed to see their eldest child for over 18 months after she had been removed as all contact visits were allowed to lapse with her ? {see my official complaint to the SRA + the Legal Ombudsman about the ?guardian solicitors? lack of ethical code and duty about this} with the other 4 children not being allowed to be seen for 6 months too ? breaking all orders the court made regarding contact visits between parents and their children as well as going against the ?Childrens Charter? touted by the government {which actually promotes contact between removed children + parents}, and also against all parties Human Rights.
 
I replied to Chiwar immediately sending him an email saying i thought it admirable in the circumstances he says what he says when so much violence has been used against him and Gloria and the children in so many ways. Whether he got my email is a different matter and unknown as so much mail ? and emails ? sent to both Chiwar and Gloria never is received, we have learnt. 
The letter received from Chiwar on Weds.: The full size pic of this letter can be seen here along with other articles on the Musa case: 

https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2012/10/20/chiwars-letter-from-pentonville-17-oct-12/

——————————————————————————–
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

? Reply #17 on: November 05, 2012, 03:43:52 AM ?

God Bless Tom Watson for having the courage to speak out against these perverts in high places!!

10 days that shook my world
November 3rd, 2012 |

“It’s ten days since I raised a question about intelligence suggesting a paedophile ring that touched the very heart of a previous government. I’d done so because a very credible retired child protection professional had lived with a gnawing suspicion of a cover up for many years.
These people are the rarest of human beings. They’re the people who labour in anonymity, day in day out, trying to make the world a better place. They have always been the foundations of our public services. Yet this retired public servant had, through a quirk of fate, stumbled on something that appeared so huge, that almost everyone he’d ever raised his concerns with had baulked at the challenge.
Since then though, many more ordinary people have contacted me about suspicions they have had of a wider wrongdoing ? in some cases so heinous it made me cry.
They have talked of psychopaths marking children with Stanley knifes to show “ownership”. They tell of parties where children were “passed around” the men. They speak of golf course car parks being the scenes for child abuse after an 18 hole round.
And they have named powerful people ? some of them household names ? who abused children with impunity.
Two former police officers have raised their concerns of cover-ups. Child protection specialists have raised their fears that the network of convicted paedophile Peter Righton, the nexus of the group, was wider than at first thought. Others have identified a former cabinet minister who regularly abused young boys.
Some have raised mysterious early deaths, disappeared children, suspicious fires, intimidation and threats.
It’s bewildering.
These allegations go way beyond the claims made on BBC Newsnight yesterday. Newsnight failed to name the paedophile mentioned by a North Wales survivor. I can understand why. A career can be destroyed by an allegation of such magnitude. There needs to be a high bar of proof.
Yet the thing I learnt most from the hacking scandal, and for that matter, the Savile case, is that the intelligence was staring the police in the face. These people were hiding in daylight. So powerful, so brazen in their actions, those who had an inkling of what was happening turned a blind eye.
Or maybe none of this happened. Maybe the 50 plus emails and numerous phone calls and letters I have received were all from fantasists. Maybe the allegations of the victims ? made for many years, consistently to anyone that would listen, maybe they’re bogus.
One thing is for certain: someone has to join the dots. And that should be the police. There are a few hardy child protection specialists who for many years, have been burrowing away, trying to uncover the truth. Their work and insight should be taken more seriously. The police should work with them.
The hacking scandal was about the police failing to follow clear leads of wrongdoing by powerful people. They could do this because politicians turned a blind eye.
This is potentially worse. Some of those powerful people involved in a cover up may well have been ? and could still be ? powerful politicians.
I’m not going to let this drop despite warnings from people who should know that my personal safety is imperilled if I dig any deeper. It’s spooked me so much that I’ve kept a detailed log of all the allegations should anything happen.
As I type this blog post, I’m half-smiling about how insane all this appears. It sounds like I’ve taken leave of my senses ? just like they said I had during the early days of the hacking scandal. Maybe I have. Yet with a properly resourced investigation, with the voice of victims being heard in public and with the political will we can get to the facts.
I wish I could fight the case of everybody who has been abused by a paedophile who has so far got away with it, but I can’t. That is a job for the police. Up and down the country private grief is being stirred by these stories. I cannot help in each individual case, but the police and support services can, must and will. If you were abused a long time ago and want justice now, go to the police. It is not too late.
What I am going to do personally is to speak out on this extreme case of organised abuse in the highest places. At the core of all child abuse is the abuse of power. The fundamental power of the adult over the child. Wherever this occurs it is an abomination. But these extreme cases are abuse of power by some of the most powerful people. Abuse of trust by some of the most trusted. It is a sickening story, but one which ? like the truth about Jimmy Savile ? is now going to be told.”

source:  http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2012/11/10-days-that-shook-my-world

——————————————————————————–
 
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

? Reply #18 on: November 24, 2012, 01:55:36 AM ?

Below is an article from the “Daily Mail” sent by Ian Josephs supposed to explain why the Nigerian government has refused so far to help the Musa family – its all apparently to do with politics and aid etc etc. Note how the Slovak government stood up for the Slovak family who were victims of child stealing too by certain people here. It is a great pity the Nigerian government have come nowhere near equalling the Slovaks’ actions in supporting their countryfolk.
The Nigerian High Commission has never really been of any use to the Musa family. Indeed, on the occasions I visited the Commission with the Musas it was a complete waste of time talking with the diplomats there, who didnt seem interested at all in the Musas heartfelt pleas regarding their tragic plight of having a total of 7 children now stolen by our government. Note some of the diplomats at the Commission are Godparents too to some of the Musa children. The words “lily livered” and “cowards” spring to mind. Such disloyalty is rarely seen in a government

Excerpt from the “Daily Mail” article 20 11 12:

 “Aid down the drain
In a blistering report, a parliamentary watchdog finds a ?230million aid project for Nigerian schools has produced ?no major improvement in pupil learning?.

And no wonder. On a visit to a typical rural school, funded by British taxpayers, an inspector from the Independent Commission on Aid Impact found almost no teachers had turned up for work, leaving pupils to play football all day.

Elsewhere, trainee teachers had given up their courses because state officials had failed to release scholarship money.

Indeed, everywhere the researchers looked, they found appalling waste.

Yet despite the ever-mounting reports of corruption and incompetence, the
Department for International Development is to give the country
?1billion over the next four years, from its fast-growing ? and ring-fenced ? budget.

How much more evidence do ministers need before they stop squandering our money abroad, to no effect, when it has never been more needed at home?”

source:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2235520/The-Lords-halt-draconian-plan.html#ixzz2CjgtxUkG

————————————————————————

The article from the African publication “The Leadership” – 21 08 2011 – detailing the shocking Musa case:

British Govt Detains Nigerian Couple?s Six Children
Sun, 21/08/2011

Six children, including an infant of a Nigerian couple are in the custody of British authorities, because the British Police insist the children are not biological children of the couple.
The five minors were said to have been whisked away by the men of the Y Police to the X Social Service  on June 12, 2010, after they had stormed the Z Hospital, where the woman claimed she had given birth to the last child, who is also in custody of the police.

Chiwar and Gloria Musa, who claim to be parents of the children, were said to have been reported to the London Borough of X by one A, on the ground that the mother is a sex worker, and that the children had different fathers.

But Chiwar told this reporter that a DNA test revealed that the six children namely; B. C. D. E and F are children of the couple, contrary to the report made to the Police by A.

Efforts by LEADERSHIP SUNDAY to confirm the story from the Metropolitan Police, however failed to yield results, as the officer in charge of enquiries refused to comment.
Also, several attempts to reach the Nigerian High Commissioner to the United Kingdom, Ambassador Dalhatu Sarki Tafida, proved abortive.

However, an official of the Nigerian High Commission, who sought anonymity, confirmed that the matter was being considered by the Commission in London.
The couple?s petition, dated August 13, 2011, and addressed to the British government to intervene, made available to LEADERSHIP SUNDAY, read in part: ?With a sorrowful heart, I wish to bring to your notice the bizarre, unthinkable, and worrisome act perpetrated by the men of the Y Police and Y social service who invaded Z Hospital, unleashed mayhem and abducted a new born baby from her unsuspecting mother. This atrocity was meted out against me and my new born baby, F, at Z Hospital, at about 3a.m on June 12, 2010.

?Regretable,painful and inhuman as it were, the action of the police did not only cause pandemonium, discomfort, unnecessary tension, and embarrassment to the patients and staff of the hospital, it revealed a plan that is Devilish in character and lacking in human feeling, insouciant in her approach to assigned duties, amateurish in style, brutish in operation, and dastardly in her acts of executing a hidden agenda that runs counter to westernised forms of civility in police modus operandi. It is unbelievable that a country like the U.K, highly respected as an icon of democracy with commendable human rights records could stoop so low to authorise  police to perpetrate acts that are antithetical and inimical to the course she goes all out to protect?.

Mr. Chiwar claimed that, ?My family has done practically nothing to deserve this painful and unwarranted suppression. Five of my children were, without cogent reason, abducted by eight policemen from Y, and while the case for their release is still being battled, nine policemen, again, in an unprovoked attack, swooped on me and my new born baby in the hospital, seizing the baby, thereby denying it of its right to natural love, breastfeeding and care by its biological parents. This is injustice of the highest order to me, my family in general and the new born baby in particular.?

Made available to LEADERSHIP SUNDAY, was a letter addressed to a senior official of the Nigerian High Commission in London, Mr. M.M.B. Aliyu, by a British columnist with the Sunday Telegraph, Christopher Booker dated 17th August 2011, which read in part: ?Since last June, as a columnist with the Sunday Telegraph, I have been following, very closely, the case of Chiwar and Gloria Musa, Nigerian citizens whose six children were last year taken from them by social workers of Y council.

?Not only have I followed on a regular basis what ensued from their loss of their children, but I have also been made familiar with many papers relating to the case. It has been quite clear to me that Y council was very seriously misled over the evidence on which it originally tore this family apart. On the basis of hearsay, they were under the impression that Mrs. Musa was a ?sex worker? and that the six children were all from different fathers?.

The letter added that ?Impressions could not have been more mistaken. Mrs. Musa is, in fact, a respected Christian preacher and an author of several books. Mr. Musa is a respectable businessman. DNA tests on the parents and children confirmed that Mr. Musa was the father of all of them?.
But, in a turn of events, the correspondent is said to have subsequently changed her report to suit the line of action of the Y police, that the children did not wish to come home. The oldest child, according to the alleged author of the handwritten letter, had not been seen by her parents since August or by her brother and sisters for several months. There are considerable grounds for disquiet as to what may have happened to her.”

source:
 http://web.archive.org/web/20111201190116/http://leadership.ng/nga/articles/4068/2011/08/21/british_govt_detains_nigerian_couple%E2%80%99s_six_children.html

 {This article has been heavily censored due to injunctions}.

———————————————————————————————–

ARTICLE FROM THE “SUNDAY TELEGRAPH”  by C. BOOKER  on: April 13, 2013, 07:33:21 AM ?

1] “The lawyer mother who beat the social workers

 A barrister who fought for parents trying to keep their children found herself a victim of the same system

The more the mother expressed unhappiness about the situation the social worker had created, the more she was told she was being ‘obstructive’ (picture posed by model) Photo: ALAMY

By Christopher Booker

4:45PM BST 06 Apr 2013

Whenever I report a new story of parents struggling to prevent social workers seizing their children for what seems no good reason, I try to give a new slant on the wider picture of how our ”child protection?? system has gone so tragically off the rails.What makes this week?s example so unusual is that it centres on a barrister who for 10 years fought hundreds of cases on behalf of parents trying to hold on to their children, in a system where she describes them as being ?like lambs led to slaughter? ? only to find herself a victim of the same system after she complained to the police over serious allegations made by her older daughter against the girl?s father.

 The police called in Barnet social services, who initially shared the mother?s concerns, advising that the girl should have no more contact with her drug-addicted father. But when a new social worker took over, she took the opposite view, working for the child to live with the father. This made the girl so miserable that she took to self-harming by slashing herself, leaving her mother distraught.

 The more the mother expressed unhappiness about the situation the social worker had created, the more she was told she was being ”obstructive?? and that there were ?concerns about her parenting?. Last December she was summoned to a meeting to be told that the council wished to apply for care orders on both her children. Knowing how automatically the courts grant such orders, the mother ? who although British was also an Israeli citizen ? saw her only hope of retaining her children was to escape to Israel.

 Within 36 hours, having obtained written permission from the older girl?s father, she took her daughters, now aged 14 and five, on several flights across Europe, terrified each time they landed that she might be arrested by police.

 Scarcely had they arrived in Israel than she heard that the council had been granted care orders. Barnet approached our embassy in Tel Aviv to arrange for the children to be deported to Britain, with the co-operation of Israeli social services. After assessing the family, however, the Israelis advised that they could see no reason why the children ? now having nightmares about being returned ? should not remain in Israel.

Related Articles

 ?Haringey tried to crush our family
 07 Apr 2013
 ?I know all about broody men who long to be dads. I am one
 03 Apr 2013
 ?’His things were thrown to the wolves?
 22 Mar 2013
 ?Good parenting can?t be measured in GDP
 20 Mar 2013
 ?Help! My four-year-old daughter is embarrassed by me
 08 Mar 2013
 ?Beware the wrong kind of Leafs on the road
 06 Apr 2013
 
In Britain the matter returned to court before a circuit judge, who criticised Barnet for its ?relentless? pursuit of the family, ordering a further hearing in February. At this, although the social worker testified that the older girl had said that she would be happy to live in foster care in England, the mother was allowed to take part by video link, along with a ?guardian? from the court advisory service, Cafcass, who had interviewed the 14-year-old on Skype. When the guardian supported the children?s wish to remain with their mother, the judge ruled that the children were now out of English jurisdiction, ordering Barnet to withdraw its case.

 The two overjoyed children are thus free to continue living with their mother in Israel, with no more nightmares about being bundled on to a plane to live with strangers 2,000 miles from what they now regard as their new home.

 Says the mother, in words many other parents would echo, ?It seems my only real mistake was to dare to seek help from the authorities in the first place.

source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/mother-tongue/familyadvice/9974950/The-lawyer-mother-who-beat-the-social-workers.html?fb
see more C. Booker articles, many involving the Musa case [up until Aug. 2011]: 

http://www.mauricejohnkirk.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/11-08-03-sunday-telegraph.pdf

—————————————————————————————

ANOTHER SERIOUSLY OUTRAGEOUS CASE:

WARNING: HARROWING VIDEO OF CHILD REMOVAL:

“Received:”Of all the SS child snatching films I have watched this has to be the most distressing I have seen, I became so angry with emotion that I couldn’t stop crying. This is the cruel social services at their worst, at their most evil, at their most heartless. You will notice that once they had forcibly grabbed little Ben they were out of the door like a flash, leaving the grieving mother to cope with her distress on her own, with no care for her, no remorse and no doctor on scene to help the poor woman. This is what our country has come to, this is child snatching at its most extreme. If I had been there I’m sorry to say that if I had a gun I would have used it, this film was that upsetting to me, and no I’m not crazy, I just care too much. If you care then please make this go viral and share it like I have and make your own comments too. Dear God help all our little children and protect them all from the wickedness of the Social services scum that steal kids from innocent parents.”

https://www.facebook.com/video/embed?video_id=443476159069924

Modify message

« Last Edit: October 20, 2013, 03:20:19 AM by butlincat »

 Report to moderator    46.165.210.17
——————————————————————————–

Posts on this forum are made by members and remian here in good faith. Any post you feel is illegal, libelous, defamortay or in anyway upsetting.
Please report it asap. The owner of this site takes no responsibility for the actions of others wishing to exercise their freedom of speach.

my blog http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com
my blog: http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
facebook: http://www.facebook.com
youtube: http://www.youtube.com/butlincat6

——————————————————————————–
 

-~@~-
Buy Blacks Law Dictionary – Amazon
-~@~-

——————————————————————————–
 

butlincat
Trusted
*****
 
Posts: 99
View Profile
 http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
 Email
 Personal Message (Online)
 

Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2013, 06:09:08 PM »

Quote
 Modify
 

Letter sent by recorded delivery 12 Aug. 2013:
 For the attention of: Lord McNally, Mr. R. Wright, Ms. H. Grant, Mr. D. Green, and Mr. C. Graying, Ms. A. Romeo,  Mr. T. Breedon, Ms. C. Lee, Dame Sue Street, Mr. M. Spurr, Mr. M. Coats, Mr. P. Hancock, Mr. B. Griffiths at the Ministry of Justice, Petty France, London.

Dear Sir / Ms.,

Regarding the unfairly imprisoned Gloria Musa, at present very unwell in Holloway prison, London.

Today, 9 Aug. 2012,  I,  John Graham,  Mckenzie Friend to the Musa Family and concerned citizen received a letter from Gloria Musa containing the attatched items, below, which are:

a] Gloria Musas’ 2nd official complaint, about certain things – her first complaint being completely ignored as she states in her statement.
b]  a report by a solicitor employed by Gloria Musa recently, who describes in detail what she has been having to put up with.
 c] 2 replies received from the “Prison Inspectorate” after my numerous messages to them concerning Gloria Musa’s situation in Holloway prison.
d] a reply received from the “Offenders Management” government department.

Below also is my report of a visit to see Gloria Musa at Holloway prison on the  30 July 2013, along with just a small selection of recorded delivery letters sent to authority figures, such as the Holloway prison governor Ms. J. Killick, Lord Mcnally Justics Minister, parliamentary undersecretaries at the Ministry of Justice, and the Prison Inspectorate and Prison Welfare at Monck St., London. Rarely have I received any replies, but those I have received, such as the one enclosed from Mr. N. Hardwick from the “Prison Inspectorate” were, sadly, without credibility and no progress was made whatsoever regarding the shocking ailments Gloria Musa has never had proper medical treatment for since 28 November 2011 when she arrived at Holloway prison, London, despite myself and others, including a solicitor notifying the authorities over and over.    

The attatchments contain Ms. Musa’s official complaint about her being taken to Downview prison under the most irregular of circumstances last December, only to be refused by Downview because, they allege, they do not administer to inmates who have to use wheelchairs. Twice Gloria was taken to Downview, as if once wasn’t enough. This, to take her to this Surrey prison at all for her to be refused is surely the equivalent of some kind of punishment having to endure this, viz. having to lie on her luggage on the floor because no proper seat or equivalent was available in the transporting van. One can only wonder with incredulity the mentality behind taking Gloria not once but twice to Downview prison, Surrey for her to be refused entry there on each occasion. Can the communications and professionalism between Holloway prison personnel and also Downview prison personnel be so incredibly bad that the 1st refusal by Downview regarding Gloria Musa was not understood? These unnecassary actions by the Holloway prison governor and  staff have caused Ms. Musa untold grief and something surely needs to be done about this level of incompetence by so-called professionals. Tax money isnt paid so as it can be squandered like this on trips back and forth between prisons with even the most basic needs for the prisoner concerned going unattended.

Also contained within the complaint and what is worrying is that Gloria tells of receiving hostile visits by a Ms. Cardiz or Candiz on the dates

 27 3 2013,

 3  4  2013,

8 4 2013,

25 4 2013,

24 6 2013,

5 7 2013,

16 7 2013

No further details are given.

Ms. Musa states in her complaint clearly she is being harassed by this person visiting along with others from Holloway prison. What on earth is going on and why are Holloway prison making a disabled convicted prisoner endure such hostilities – why are they refusing to do anything about her official complaints and why are her serious medical ailments not being given the proper attention? Why is Gloria Musa having to put up with an infection in her private parts because of this prolonged untreated bleeding which began upon her giving birth on March 10 2012? Surely the Holloway governor has much to answer for regarding denying Gloria Musa getting the correct medical treatment.

Also attatched is an report from Prime Solicitors of 26A The Centre
 Feltham
 Middlesex
 TW13 4AU 
which gives in detail a much more concise report of what Gloria Musa is having to endure in Holloway prison. I know the report is based on fact because many of the items described within this report I have tried to notify authorities of myself, such as Gloria’s shocking medical condition – her many ailments, including bleeding internally since giving birth to her baby in a cell in Holloway prison on March 10 2012 being always denied proper medical treatment. Also Gloria should not be in a wheelchair but that is a result of not getting proper medical treatment for a painful and badly damaged knee.

The prison has always denied Gloria Musa proper medical care. As I stated already I have notified the authorities many times – the 5 high-ups at the Ministry of Justice [pls see below my letter to them] and many MPs and numerous others in authority but always my notifications are treated with contempt and ignored.

sincerely,

——
Mckenzie friend to the Musa family and concerned citizen 9 Aug. 2013

Please read these enclosed articles concerning the convicted prisoner in Holloway womens’ prison Bishop Gloria Musa – no. A2767CJ.

Gloria has serious medical ailments which go untreated at the prison.
Perhaps the most serious ailment she has is that she has been bleeding non-stop from internally since giving birth to a baby in a cell in Holloway prison on March 10 2012 – some 17 months ago. She has been bleeding profusely since then and now a painful infection has developed in her private parts, for which she is shockingly denied medical treatment, along with other serious ailments.
 Bishop Gloria Musa is now disabled and needs the use of a wheelchair permanently and is unable to walk since entering Holloway prison, and also has eyesight problems, an arm and a painful hip problem too, all of which go untreated. Please read this solicitors report written recently:
  File 4:

Solicitors recent report re: Gloria Musa – sheet 1
 Download Link:  http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/syyjo5

 File 5:

Solicitors recent report re: Gloria Musa – sheet 2
 Download Link:  http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/mmgjcw

I have written numerous letters to authority figures such as Lord Mcnally, Jeremy Corbyn MP, N. Hardwick [prison inspectorate] and many more including notably the Holloway governer Ms. J. Killick, who has always treated my communications with contempt, mostly ignoring them all, but worse than that she allows Ms. Musa to be denied proper medical treatment, which has been the subject of my Recorded Delivery communcations to her on many occasions. When i did write to her stating about Ms. Musas’ medical treatment was being denied proper medical care I was told I was making “serious allegations” – here is that reply from Ms. Killick dated 10 October 2012:

http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/i1ka2a

 How close to death is Ms. Musa, due to blood poisoning, or whatever?

Bishop Gloria is also  the victim of much victimisation and illtreatment by the warders there, as she will tell you. It is truly shameful how many of the Holloway prison staff have always had their own personal agendas against Ms. Musa – instead of doing their jobs properly and with responsibility. Instead, for example, they do not allow her the adequate amount of sanitary towels she needs with her condition, the result being Gloria awakens in the mornings lieing in blood. Please read the solicitors report enclosed. The prison staff often chide and mock her relentlessly, and make unnecassary insidious comments showing insult and derision. It is truly disgraceful how she is being treated [take the trips to Downview prison for example, where she was forced to lie on her luggage on the floor of the transporting vehicle, which cause her much pain and distress] and I personally have been on the receiving end of certain Holloway prison warders venom on occasion on visits to Gloria Musa. However this message is not about me and I am naming no warders names – I am trying to communicate with you about the denial of proper care and medical treatment Gloria Musa should be getting and is ENTITLED TO in Holloway prison.

The attatchments sent originally with the recorded delivery letters sent to “authority figures” are below – none of whom replied to previous recorded delivery letters sent to them previously, apart from those mentioned herein.

Thank you for your time.

Mckenzie friend to the Musa family and very concerned citizen. 

15 Aug. 2013

…………………….Attatchments:

 File 1:

 Gloria’s 2nd complaint – sheet 1

 Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/39daoc

 File 2:
 
 Gloria’s 2nd complaint – sheet 2

 Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/mavvc3

 File 3:

 Gloria’s 2nd complaint – sheet 3

 Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/c215wt

 File 4:

Solicitors recent report re: Gloria Musa medical situation – sheet 1

 Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/syyjo5

 File 5:

Solicitors recent report re: Gloria Musa’s medical situation – sheet 2

 Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/mmgjcw

 File 6:

Reply to myself to a letter sent to many authority figures – the “Offenders Management” replying here stating “all organisations delivering NHS  care strive to ensure that all patients receive the best possible treatment” – this statement is ludicrous and just shows how out of touch this supposed government department is with whats really going on. MS. MUSA IS NOT RECEIVING ANY MEDICAL TREATMENT FOR HER SERIOUS AILMENTS AND HAS BEEN BLEEDING FROM INTERNALLY SINCE GIVING BIRTH IN A CELL ON 10 MARCH 2012, THE RESULT BEING SHE NOW HAS A PAINFUL INFECTION IN HER PRIVATE PARTS WHICH ALSO GOES COMPLETELY UNTREATED. THESE AILMENTS COULD SOON PROVE LIFE THREATENING – YET THE PRISON AND OTHER AUTHORITIES DO NOTHING ABOUT MS. MUSAS SERIOUS MEDICAL CONDITION – AND THEY HAVE BEEN TOLD ABOUT THIS EVER WORSENING SITUATION IN MANY RECORDED DELIVERY LETTERS TO THEM FOR MONTHS.

http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/0kzp8r

File 7:

Rare reply from Ms. Killick, Holloway prison governor stating I am making “serious allegations” regarding Ms. Musa;

 http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/i1ka2a

Modify message

« Last Edit: September 06, 2013, 06:22:31 PM by butlincat »

 Report to moderator    46.165.221.13
——————————————————————————–

Posts on this forum are made by members and remian here in good faith. Any post you feel is illegal, libelous, defamortay or in anyway upsetting.
Please report it asap. The owner of this site takes no responsibility for the actions of others wishing to exercise their freedom of speach.

my blog http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com
my blog: http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
facebook: http://www.facebook.com
youtube: http://www.youtube.com/butlincat6

——————————————————————————–
 

-~@~-
Purchase – Moriarty’s police law – Amazon
-~@~-

——————————————————————————–
 

butlincat
Trusted
*****
 
Posts: 99
View Profile
 http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
 Email
 Personal Message (Online)
 

Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2013, 08:47:55 PM »

Quote
 Modify
 
GLORIA MUSA ? IN HOLLOWAY PRISON AND STILL BLEEDING INTERNALLY 16 MONTHS AFTER GIVING BIRTH ON MARCH 10 2012.

Posted on August 2, 2013   by butlincat   

Bishop-Gloria-Musa1

Visit to see Gloria Musa in Holloway Prison, 30 July 2013

?I saw Gloria today at Holloway ? it was very sad. She was tearful for the whole visit of approximately an hour ? and full of anger too ? and wouldn?t you be if youd had 7 children removed for no reason, been given a 7 year sentence in prison on an extremely dubious conviction and have been bleeding from internally for 16 months after giving birth to your last baby in a cell in Holloway prison, and still are denied medical treatment for that and other major ailments, including the infection that is festering around ones private parts because of the untreated bleeding. This is exactly Gloria Musa?s situation today, as I write, and it is outrageous it is being allowed to happen at all.
 What I don?t understand is, if the so-called ?Association of Mckenzie Friends? set-up is meant to be so helpful to families who have had or who are about to have children removed, along with the MP who is very much connected with it, how come Gloria Musa is still and has been suffering in prison for 16 months bleeding constantly since giving birth on March 10 2012? How come nobody connected to this ?association? has done one single thing to alleviate Gloria Musa?s appalling suffering? This ?association? cant claim they don?t know about Glorias? situation because Sabine Mcneil who began the set-up has been making herself busy in the case for some time. Maybe actually making progress is not one of Ms. Mcneils fortes, or anyone else in the set-up for that matter, but getting known for something is. Its pathetic. The tiger with no teeth.
 Gloria Musas? situation is so dire that she is even denied an adequate amount of sanitary towels to use, and whats more is forced to lie on bloodstained bedding, as she recounted to me during this visit.
 Communications notifying of Gloria?s situation to the prison service, including the Independent Monitoring Board, and the Ministry of Justice and others, including numerous MPs are generally completely ignored, as are letters to the Holloway prison governor about Glorias? outrageous situation. The rare replies that are received contain nothing of any worth, other than saying things are being looked into, or other vague statements. Well, they may be being looked into, but nothing is ever done about the appalling situation.The Ministry of Justice state, in a reply [below] to my notifying them of Gloria Musas? constant internal bleeding and other serious ailments:
?all organisations delivering NHS care strive to ensure that all patients receive the best possible treatment?.
This couldn?t be further from the truth, and Gloria Musa with her many serious untreated ailments is an absolute witness to the Ministry of Justices? untrue statement.
 During the Musas? dubious criminal trial half the court was in tears when the police themselves recounted the battering and mistreatment they gave Gloria at 3 in the morning in her single cublcle in hospital in the summer of 2010 when police and social workers took her 1st baby hours after birth when she was being breastfed by Gloria ? its due to the injuries she received in the middle of the night then that Gloria cannot walk today. She has been in a wheelchair in Holloway prison many months with a chronic untreated knee ailment as she now cannot walk at all.
 The prison sentence was for 7 years ? an outrage in itself ? but not treating Gloria Musa?s bleeding for half of it was not part of the sentence, and denying her an adequate amount of sanitary towels, and not treating the resulting infection is nothing less than barbaric. Its an utter outrage!

This is a true sworn statement by J. Graham 2 August 2013.

 Letter dated 13 May 2013 from the Ministry of Justice after notifying them of Gloria Musa?s medical condition ? click on it to enlarge.

 Red underlined states: “…all organisations delivering NHS care strive to ensure that all patients receive the best possible treatment…”  – CLEARLY NOT THE CASE IN GLORIA’S SITUATION AND THIS CARE AS STATED IN THIS LETTER CANNOT BE BEING GIVEN AS SHE WAKES EACH DAY IN A NEWLY FORMED PATCH OF BLOOD AND HAS BEEN BLEEDING FROM INTERNALLY SINCE GIVING BIRTH TO HER BABY ON MARCH 10 2012!! 

white1 011aa

——————————————————————————– 

butlincat
Trusted
*****
 
Posts: 99
View Profile
 http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
 Email
 Personal Message (Online)
 

Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

« Reply #4 on: September 07, 2013, 09:39:16 PM »

Quote
 Modify
 

Friday, 6 September 2013

Top judge’s war on secret courts: Family hearings must be exposed to ‘glare of publicity’
Sir James Munby, president of the Family Division of the High Court  said parents of children taken into care should no longer be gagged by courts

Judgment came in case of parents whose four children taken into state care
Council tried to ban video of seizure in April by social workers and police 
[another: The video the judges tried to block: WARNING: HARROWING VIDEO:   http://truth-wars.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=2356.0

Sir James said there is a ‘pressing need’ for workings of family courts to be opened up to public scrutiny

By Steve Doughty, Social Affairs CorrespondentOne of Britain?s most senior judges vowed yesterday to expose family courts to ?the glare of publicity? after decades of obsessive secrecy.

In a landmark ruling, Sir James Munby said parents of children taken into care must no longer be gagged by the courts and the public should be told what social workers are up to.

Sir James, who is president of the Family Division of the High Court, said the removal of children from their families had become the most drastic matter judges dealt with now there was no death penalty. He said the rulings could affect mothers for ?upwards of 60 or even 70 years? and children for even longer.

There was a ?pressing need? for the workings of the family courts to be opened to public view and the arguments for scrutiny and public accountability were compelling.

Parents must be given the freedom to criticise judges, the courts and social workers, and the Press must be free to report what has happened without the interference of judges, Sir James added. The break-up of families by the state must no longer happen in secret, on the pretext of protecting the children involved.

The Mail has reported numerous cases where the names of social workers, experts who advise the courts and even the names of councils have been kept under legal wraps. The voices of those whose families are split up by social workers and kept apart on the orders of family court judges have been routinely silenced. 

But Sir James?s unprecedented ruling is likely to punch a hole through this curtain of secrecy.

His judgement came in the case of parents whose four children have been taken into state care. The father made a video of the seizure in April of the couple?s newborn by social workers and police. The film was posted widely over the internet.

Sir James rejected a sweeping injunction designed to effectively prevent anyone in the world from seeing the film, knowing the names of the social workers involved, or even discovering the name of the local authority that applied for the order, Staffordshire County Council.

More…
The video judges tried to block: Father secretly records harrowing moment six-hour-old baby is taken away by social services
Health Secretary demands ‘urgent clarification’ of decision not to prosecute doctors who agreed to perform illegal abortions because of the babies’ sex
Judge allows controversial bite mark analysis in trial of man accused of strangling woman in Times Square hotel
Mother who spent 23 years on Death Row for murder of her son, 4, before appeal court threw out her conviction is to be released pending retrial

The order means the video, which includes pictures of the baby, can be more widely distributed and watched by anyone.

The submission by Staffordshire that naming the authority or its social workers would lead to identification of the baby was ?merely fanciful?, the judge said.

Sir James, who is president of the Family Division of the High Court (pictured),
Sir James, who is president of the Family Division of the High Court (pictured), said the removal of children from their families has become the most drastic matter judges deal with

However Sir James said the names of the parents and the baby must stay secret in order to protect the child from any harm publicity might bring.

The parents of the baby, known only as J, have never been accused of harming their children, the father said yesterday. Instead social workers decided that his wife was incapable of bringing them up because of her learning disability, he claimed.

 ?Freedom of speech is not something to be awarded to those who are thought deserving and denied to those who are thought undeserving?, Sir James Munby

?They were taken away as a preventative or precautionary measure,? he said.

Sir James said the case raised ?important questions about the extent to which the public should be able to read and see what disgruntled parents say when they speak out about apparent deficiencies in the family justice system?.

He added: ?It must never be forgotten that, with the state?s abandonment of the right to impose capital sentences, orders of the kind which family judges are typically invited to make in public law proceedings are amongst the most drastic that any judge in any jurisdiction is ever empowered to make.

?When a family judge makes a placement order or an adoption order in relation to a 20-year-old mother?s baby, the mother will have to live with the consequences of that decision for what may be upwards of 60 or even 70 years, and the baby for what may be upwards of 80 or even 90 years.?

The ruling in the case of child J promises to end years of gagging of parents, who have found themselves threatened with legal sanctions and imprisonment if they try to talk about what has happened when their children are taken into care or adopted.

Liberal Democrat MP John Hemming welcomed the judgment 
Liberal Democrat MP John Hemming welcomed the judgment

Newspapers and broadcasters trying to investigate the behaviour of social workers have found themselves prevented by law from speaking to parents or publishing any details of what has happened to them.

The system has ensured that the stories of how more than 60,000 youngsters who live in children?s homes or with foster parents in the care system cannot be known.

Sir James, who took over as head of the family court system in January, set down new guidance for the courts in July that called for much greater transparency. He said the public had the right to read judgements now rarely published.

The guidance also applies to the Court of Protection, the secretive system which decides the affairs of people too ill to make their own decisions.

 Earlier this year Sir James and Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge ordered the family courts and the Court of Protection to stop imposing in secret jail sentences for contempt of court.

This followed the disclosure by the Daily Mail that a Court of Protection judge secretly imprisoned 50-year-old Wanda Maddocks for disobeying its instructions and trying to remove her father from a care home his family disliked.

John Hemming, a Liberal Democrat MP who has been pressing for more openness in the family courts, said: ?People have been going to jail for complaining about what is done to them, and that is wrong. This is a good judgement.
?I was very pleased when Sir James was appointed as president of the Family Division because I thought he would change the direction of an unaccountable and opaque system to an open system.?
Philip Atkins, leader of Staffordshire County Council said: ?It is a ground breaking ruling because the court has recognised and clarified the need to protect children?s interests within the electronic world that we now live.
?Ultimately, this ruling means that websites hosted in England and Wales must not publish information which identifies a child who is being protected by care proceedings. From now on children will have the same protection for privacy in the electronic world as they do in print.?

We don’t need new law to muzzle the Press: Judge’s comments put him on collision course with lawyers and politicians
Sir James Munby struck a blow for free speech yesterday, putting the leading judge on a collision course with fellow lawyers and politicians who are trying to restrict it.

As part of a ruling against secrecy in the family courts, Sir James declared: ?Freedom of speech is not something to be awarded to those who are thought deserving and denied to those who are thought undeserving?.

Sir James’s comments counters Lord Justice Leveson’s (pictured) report on the culture, practice and ethics of the Press 
Sir James’s comments counters Lord Justice Leveson’s (pictured) report on the culture, practice and ethics of the Press
He defended the right of the Press to criticise ? even in the most ?robust? terms ? and stressed the importance of its power to expose wrongdoing.

His views clashed starkly with those of other judges who have in recent years developed wide privacy laws that have prevented newspapers and broadcasters from publishing uncomfortable truths about the rich and famous.

It also counters Lord Justice Leveson?s report on the culture, practice and ethics of the Press published last autumn.

Lord Leveson condemned the ?outrageous? behaviour of some of the Press and called for a new and tougher regulatory system backed by new laws ? effectively state regulation of newspapers.

Sir James, who is president of the Family Division of the High Court, said the Press was necessary to ensure scrutiny of the courts and that occasional bad behaviour by some journalists had to be tolerated.

If Press criticism ?exceeds what is lawful? there are already laws to deal with that.
?It is not the role of the judge to seek to exercise any kind of editorial control over the manner in which the media reports information which it is entitled to publish,? he said. ?Comment and criticism may be ill informed and based on misunderstanding or misrepresentation of the facts.
?The fear of such criticism, however justified the fear may be, is, however, not of itself a justification for prior restraint by injunction.?

He also stood up for the rights of tabloid newspapers to express criticism in ?intemperate language?.

?If there is no basis for injuncting a story expressed in the temperate or scholarly language of a legal periodical or the broadsheet press, there can be no basis for injuncting the same story simply because it is expressed in the more robust, colourful or intemperate language of the tabloid press or even in language which is crude, insulting and vulgar.

?The publicist … may be an unprincipled charlatan seeking to manipulate public opinion by feeding it tendentious accounts of the proceedings. But freedom of speech is not something to be awarded to those who are thought deserving and denied to those who are thought undeserving.?
Lord Leveson condemned the ‘outrageous’ behaviour of some of the Press
Lord Leveson condemned the ‘outrageous’ behaviour of some of the Press and called for a new and tougher regulatory system backed by new laws ? effectively state regulation of newspapers
Unlike Lord Leveson, he emphasised the ?enormous challenges? posed by the internet
?The law must develop and adapt, as it always has done down the years in response to other revolutionary technologies.?

Privacy law, developed by judges and based on the Human Rights Act, has encouraged increasing numbers of celebrities to apply for injunctions concealing embarrassing stories about themselves.

It led to a controversy in 2011 which led to MPs and peers using parliamentary privilege to name two individuals who had used privacy injunctions to suppress news of extra-marital affairs, ex-Royal Bank of Scotland chief Fred Goodwin and footballer Ryan Giggs.

PUBLIC HAVE RIGHT TO KNOW: EDITED VERSION OF SIR JAMES’ RULING

There is a pressing need for more transparency, indeed for much more transparency, in the family justice system.

There are a number of aspects to this. One is the right of the public to know, the need for the public to be confronted with what is being done in its name.

Nowhere is this more necessary than in relation to care and adoption cases. Such cases, by definition, involve interference, intrusion, by the state, by local authorities and by the court, into family life.

In this context the arguments in favour of publicity ? in favour of openness, public scrutiny and public accountability ? are particularly compelling.

The public generally, and not just the professional readers of law reports or similar publications, have a legitimate, indeed a compelling, interest in knowing how the family courts exercise their care jurisdiction.

I have said this many times in the past but it must never be forgotten that, with the state?s abandonment of the right to impose capital sentences, orders of the kind which family judges are typically invited to make in public law proceedings are amongst the most drastic that any judge in any jurisdiction is ever empowered to make.

When a family judge makes a placement order or an adoption order in relation to a 20-year-old mother?s baby, the mother will have to live with the consequences of that decision for what may be upwards of 60 or even 70 years, and the baby for what may be upwards of 80 or even 90 years. We must be vigilant to guard against the risks.

We must have the humility to recognise ? and to acknowledge ? that public debate, and the jealous vigilance of an informed media, have an important role to play in exposing past miscarriages of justice and in preventing possible future miscarriages of justice.

The compelling need for transparency in the family justice system is demanded as a matter of both principle and pragmatism.

It is vital that public confidence in the family justice system is maintained or, if eroded, restored. There is a clear and obvious public interest in maintaining the confidence of the public at large in the courts.

It is vitally important, if the administration of justice is to be promoted and public confidence in the courts maintained, that justice be administered in public ? or at least in a manner which enables its workings to be properly scrutinised ? so that the judges and other participants in the process remain visible and amenable to comment and criticism.

The family lawyer?s reaction to complaints of ?secret justice? tends to be that the charge is unfair, that it confuses a system which is private with one which is secret. This semantic point is, I fear, more attractive to lawyers than to others.

The remedy, even if it is probably doomed to only partial success, is ? it must be ?  more transparency; putting it bluntly, letting the glare of publicity into the family courts.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2413373/Top-judges-war-secret-courts-Family-hearings-exposed-glare-publicity.html#ixzz2eEswIOPk

———————————————————————————————–

 FRAUD ? END THE SOCIAL SERVICES CHILD ABDUCTION SYSTEMS WORLDWIDE

A message from the campaign:

GIVE US BACK OUR CHILDREN, OUR
 FAMILIES, OUR LIVES! NOW!!!

There are hundreds of thousands of families and even more children suffering at the hands of CPS/SS/Corrupt Family Court and there is no one doing anything about it. 

We must DEMAND an audit of the hundreds of billions of dollars that are funneled through the federal government to TITLE-IV FUNDS that are used to abuse and destroy families and they force children into foster care, forced adoptions and lives with abusers and pedophiles, and except for those of us who are victims of this system of CHILD TRAFFICKING no one seems to believe it is really happening?

IT IS HAPPENING, AND SOON, IT COULD HAPPEN TO YOUR DAUGHTER OR YOUR GRANDDAUGHTER OR YOU, and then you will see that you have no protection, no rights and soon, no children, no family, no home, no job and NO LIFE~ and you can thank the organized crime that runs our government, big business, churches and OUR COURT SYSTEM in pursuit of financial gain via THE INVISIBLE HAND OF GREED that runs the world.

find us, join us and fight with us. we are MOTHERS WHO WANT OUR CHILDREN BACK  and we will NEVER GIVE UP! you may also find us on the blog:

http://links.causes.com/s/clL7HP?r=baaEg

and fb group: HUMANITY AGAINST CHILD STEALING ? BRING THE CHILDREN HOME?

https://www.causes.com/causes/661915-end-the-social-services-child-abduction-systems-worldwide/updates/799244

Modify message

« Last Edit: September 22, 2013, 01:21:53 AM by butlincat »

 Report to moderator    46.165.208.207
——————————————————————————–

Posts on this forum are made by members and remian here in good faith. Any post you feel is illegal, libelous, defamortay or in anyway upsetting.
Please report it asap. The owner of this site takes no responsibility for the actions of others wishing to exercise their freedom of speach.

my blog http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com
my blog: http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
facebook: http://www.facebook.com
youtube: http://www.youtube.com/butlincat6

——————————————————————————–
 

 

——————————————————————————–
 

butlincat
Trusted
*****
 
Posts: 99
View Profile
 http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
 Email
 Personal Message (Online)
 

Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

« Reply #5 on: September 17, 2013, 04:01:28 AM »

Quote
 Modify
 
Important Videos, Links, + Christopher Booker “Sunday Telegraph” Articles beginning April 2010:

1] My videos of interviews with Chiwar and Gloria Musa  in their former home, under the control of of the X council who evicted them on ridiculously short notice in Aug. 2011. A very onesided appeal took place at Edmonton court, at which I was present, where the Musas stood no chance, especially with no legal representation, as the Musas legal rep. was ejected from rthe room at the very start of the proceedings. Another very wrong farce of a hearing. The Musas were duly evicted with nowhere to go and they became homeless, sleeping in church halls and at friends fior very short periods. My accomodation did not allow for stayers or they could gladly have come stay with me, but anyweay, that wouldve been impractical in many ways.

These videos from April 2011 of Chiwar and Bishop Gloria Musa at their Haringey home, before their imprisonment [on remand] on Nov. 28 2011, before their 7 year sentencing 259 days later on Aug. 14 2012, and before the birth of their 7th baby, in Holloway prison, on March 10 2012 – the baby being removed at once before even Gloria could look at him properly, and Chiwar, the father, has never seen this child at all – he has simply vanished into the care system along with the other 6 children and who knows where they all are now: [videos total length 26 mins]
 
a] http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=11f53cd65762834b3af0b2d&skin_id=1603&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url
 
b] http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=11f5398ceed4e4e312670f4&skin_id=601&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

 
2}  Video: The Musa Case – The Irregular Interim Care Order Hearings: During 2010, from the date in April then the then 5 Musa children were removed by Haringey council and during November 2011 when the Musa parents were remanded in prison on very dubious charges every 28 days the Interim Care Order on each child had, by law, to be renewed in the Family court. It was the parents right to attend this hearing each time it occurred if they objected to the ICO being issued, which eas the case each 28 days. But on January 12 2012 when Chiwar Musa was due in court for the ICO renewal hearing instead of being taken to the court he was taken everywhere but. Coming from Pentonville prison he was at first driven in the prison transport to the Royal Courts of Justice but instead of being taken to the hearing there the van drove around the car park there for a few minutes before being taken to a completely different court where they parked up for hours before he was taken back to the prison. There could have been np mistake about this hearing, the participants and the location etc as this was a monthly ritual held every 28 days as stated, but not only that but I had confirmed everything with the court employee whowas very well versed and ready with answers regarding the events to come the following day when I called the court the day before. This was not the first time the Musas have been disallowed from appearing at their ICO hearings, as Chiwar and Gloria will tell anybody.  This type of thing is a typical irregularity within the legal framework of the Musas’ case – on other occasions I am told hearings have taken place without the Musas being present which, of course, is their legal right in every instance. If any complaint is made about anything it is quickly ignored and brushed aside – that has been the norm in 99% of instances for over 3 years.

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=12130faedd68d9190602b96&skin_id=3000&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

3}  Reporter Christopher Bookers articles for the “Sunday Telegraph” on this case {these links stop Aug. 2011 – more articles exist} =
 
http://mauricejohnkirk.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/11-08-03-sunday-telegraph.pdf
 
4}  April 2008 Daily Mail = “Baby P council falsely accused me of abusing a child, reveals whistleblower who feared she’d lose her daughter.” 
{By Eileen Fairweather} =
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1086196/Baby-P-council-falsely-accused-abusing-child-reveals-whistleblower-feared-shed-lose-daughter.html

4a]  WHISTLEBLOWER UKRAINIAN PRIEST TELLS OF UNITED NATION’S [U.N.] AGENDA OF CHILDSTEALING WORLDWIDE….please persevere thru to the end with this video – the translating from Ukrainian to English takes its toll on some viewers,sadly…

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=1210cd4417dc19da0b7c4fc&skin_id=1602&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

5a}  Figures at an all time high for children being removed from families, most often good, loving ones – Daily Mail April 12 2012 =
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2128987/Children-stolen-state.html

5b] The Guardian “Adoption and children in state care across England: get the data” – 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/sep/26/adoption-and-care-statistics-england?intcmp=239
 
6} The African publication “The Leadership”‘s articles  are just 2 of many African exposes on the case:

http://leadership.ng/nga/articles/5282/2011/09/17/british_journalist_writes_jonathan_over_seized_nigerian_children.html

http://leadership.ng/nga/articles/4068/2011/08/21/british_govt_detains_nigerian_couple%E2%80%99s_six_children.html

7]  Children waiting for adoption figures at all time high:

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/121893/ADOPTION__FIGURES_AT_ALL_TIME_HIGH_OF_CHILDREN_IN_CARE_WAITING_FOR_ADOPTION__SKY_NEWS_21_JAN_13/

 8]  Affadavits:
File1:
 File Name: MUSA MOJI AFFADAVIT.pdf
 Description: MOJI WORD AFFADAVIT 20/4/11
 File Size: 182.1 KB
 Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/5tt9am
 
File 2:
 File Name: MUSA FULL PDF 4 3 12.pdf
 Description: RESUME / GLORIA STATEMENT 4/3/12
 File Size: 130.6 KB
 Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/imddy9

8] Letter 20 March 2013 sent by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery to 5 Ministry of Justice representatives – as usual  no replies have been received as of 25 days later – and one letter to Lord Mcnally didnt even get delivered, according to an operative at the post room at parliament. Many more letters have been sent by recorded delivery – 99% remain unanswered, especially from the Ministry of Justice:

http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/eblkjc

9] MailOnline article 26 July 2013 by Sue Reid: ?For years I fought against secret courts breaking up families. At last there?s hope?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2377084/SUE-REID-For-years-I-fought-secret-courts-breaking-families-At-theres-hope.html#ixzz2aJqP7uQa

10] Christopher Booker article 20 July 13: ?Our child protection system is an international scandal?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10191983/Our-child-protection-system-is-an-international-scandal.html

11] Outright witness intimidation has happened many times throughout this case – I was introduced to 3 single mothers who fell victim to intimidation because of supporting the Musa family – one such witness’s story is here:

http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/qbgf23

12] WARNING: HARROWING VIDEO:  THE VIDEO THE JUDGES TRIED TO BLOCK: TOP JUDGE SIR JAMES MUNBY RULING:

http://truth-wars.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=2356.0

13] CAUL GRANT ARRESTED – THE UTTER CORRUPTION – CAMPAIGN FOR TRUTH + JUSTICE:

See more: http://butlincat.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-utter-corruption-of-some-judges.html

http://truth-wars.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=2333.0
—————————————————————————————————————–

Here is the updated report of yesterdays [27 Oct. 13] visit to see Gloria Musa in HMP Send, Woking, Surrey.
We saw Gloria Musa this afternoon Sunday 27 Oct. 13 at HMP Send, near Woking, Surrey. Friend B had come down from Tilbury to Woking, taking 4 hours, to visit Gloria.

 We saw Gloria who was tearful much of the time in a decrepit old wheelchair falling to bits – the new one supporters bought her costing £104 has been denied her, but was delivered to Holloway on 4 March – the records from the delivery firm confirm that. This is theft, and this matter is ongoing.

Gloria was denied the use of her slippers for the visit, as theyre more comfortable…. How a person can be denied the use of their own slippers beats me.

She had to leave the visit early – an hour early – because she was in so much pain.

We heard that she is still bleeding profusely from internally, in her groin area, and is not allowed to wash her blood-soaked clothes out properly. She can only rinse her undergarments out in her cell and dry them by hanging them up somewhere in the cell. No wonder a massive lump has appeared now in her groin and a painful infection too has existed for months – both of which are denied medical treatment. It is a fact if you or I were bleeding from the groin it would have stopped a week or so later after being given the proper medical treatment. Gloria has been bleeding for over 19 months now and the authorities have ignored every message and notification about this outrageous situation. Other ailments still exist too – inflicted on her by the police when they snatched her 1st baby in mid-2-10 at her birth at 3 in the morning after Gloria had just given birth to her and was breast feeding her. At least 6 police and a number of social workers we are told burst into her single cublicle in hospital and removed the baby, causing Gloria Musa many injuries in the process the baby – strangling her at one point to near unconciousness. Other patients heard the commotion but were told to ignore it. Gloria received a damaged hip and knee from that event, [and photographs exist of injuries received then] which has never had the proper medical treatment, hence her need for a wheelchair – and Holloway witheld the one that was got for her and was delivered on 4 March 2013 – what happened to it?

Also Gloria is forced to do cleaning jobs even though she cant stand up without aids, such as crutches. They forced her to clean her cell windows, and of course you cannot ask a person who cant stand to clean high-up windows 6 feet from the floor. They  wouldn’t have it that she couldn’t stand and clean windows and just gave her grief.

 Gloria is still living on bottled water, bananas, oranges and noodles bought from the canteen, and I wouldn’t eat the prison food they dish up either as it could well have been compromised with anything, such as illegal drugs. Gloria cannot take the risk that one of the continual crazy drug tests she has to undergo come back positive for illegal drugs, or whatever.

 Also she told us a letter was delivered to her that i sent last March 2012!!! Holloway had not delivered it to her and those at Send gave it to her the other day. We have been aware since her entry into Holloway prison on 28 November 2011 that mail to and from Gloria is messed with neverendingly – some gets through – some doesn’t and I know I have complained about this along with others to no avail – also Chiwars mail is messed with also with important letters not reaching their destination, and not being received also by him.

Also Gloria said she doesnt go to the toilet anymore and hasnt for months. Thats bad news as well and not natural, brought on by her sparse diet.

…..Thats it. What an awful day. I feel so much for Gloria in her situation. Prison sentences aren’t meant to be like this, but hers has always been sustained far from the norm, with certain high-up prison officers continually treating her with scorn, insult, ridicule and often outright hostility and injury. I know of examples of each unacceptable quality just described, and prison warders, especially the governor and those of similar ranks, are required to perform their public duty to a certain standard with a level of caring professionalism – sadly these 2 qualities are extremely often very much lacking regarding their behaviour towards Gloria Musa – these government employees warders simply fail the oath they took when taking the job – it is a public scandal Gloria has been treated with such contempt since November 2011 – Chiwar Musa too – yet when authorities are informed about the constant irregularities, they do absolutely nothing, thus showing the utmost contempt not only for their rules and regulations but also towards another human being, for example:

a] Glorias’ constant internal bleeding continues still after 19+ months with no proper adequate medical treatment,

b] Glorias’ trips to Downview prison earlier this year for a supposed prison transfer – twice – were highly irregular as she had to lie on the floor of the transporting vehicle to the place and back as no adequate seating was present – her lieing on the floor of the vehicle on her luggage for hours at a time caused her great pain and distress. These visits to Downview were a hoax – as twice she was taken there but the Downview regime refused to accept Gloria as she was in a wheelchair, which they don’t cater for which surely Holloway personnel knew about as they liase beforehand – they just don’t turn up with prisoners on a prison transfer , they discuss it first – so the Holloway prison personnel mustve known the fact that inmates in wheelchairs aren’t catered for – if not regarding the first trip but definitely the 2nd but still Gloria was subjected to this cruel callous irregular treatment by Holloway prison staff. After the first trip to Downview Gloria was returned to Holloway and got back during the  evening but was put in a new cell but couldn’t get onto the bunk bed. She tells that when trying to get onto the bed because she is disabled she fell and was left for hours lieing on the floor of the cell as she couldn’t reach the button to call the warders higher up on the wall.

Why isn’t Gloria being cared for properly? She tells us prison warders tell her there is nothing wrong with her and she is putting it all on. Why then don’t they take her for an x-ray on her hip, or knee, for example, both of which Gloria tells us are badly damaged? X-rays would show conclusively if she is lieing or not, as if the blood-stained sheets all the time don’t show she isn’t lieing. Of course the prison regime wont arrange for x-rays because its 99% probable that any x-rays would show irregular medical conditions that are in need of urgent medical treatment, which has never been given and very much should’ve been.

 And what is that lump that Gloria speaks of in her groin that has recently developed since getting the chronic infection and constant internal bleeding in her groin area? The prison authorities in 2 prisons – Holloway and Send – don’t want to know about any of that – it is disgraceful!”


child formerly known as Favor but had name changed, now 11 years old:

more:

“Telegraph” reports from the time:

The mystery of Haringey’s missing ‘Girl X’ makes a mockery of the Children Act

The family of a girl taken into care have not seen or heard from her for 10 months, writes Christopher Booker.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8570173/The-mystery-of-Haringeys-missing-Girl-X-makes-a-mockery-of-the-Children-Act.html

more: 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/9120754/We-already-have-unjust-secret-courts.html

We already have unjust secret courts
Behind a wall of secrecy, the family courts routinely turn all the familiar principles of justice upside down.
 
Dreyfus was convicted on the basis of evicence shown to the judge in secret Photo: ALAMY By Christopher Booker
7:00PM GMT 03 Mar 2012
There was outrage last week over government plans to extend the degree to which our courts can operate in secret. David Davis, former shadow home secretary, claimed that such “a regime of secret courts and hidden judgments”, where defendants could not even be “told the evidence against them”, were worthy only of “despotic one-party states such as Syria, Iran and North Korea”. A letter from 57 of the 69 lawyers already familiar with such practices, from their work on terrorist cases, protested that extending this system would “represent a departure from the foundational principles of natural justice that all parties are allowed to see and challenge all the evidence relied on before the court”.

However shocking this may sound, though, it is already the system which operates in our family courts. Behind a wall of secrecy, they routinely turn all the familiar principles of justice upside down in just this way. Among the dozens of cases I have reported where children are removed from their parents, often for what appear the most absurd reasons, I have been astonished to hear how judges accept extraordinary claims by social workers and lawyers without allowing the parents to challenge them. Hearsay evidence is accepted in a way that would never be allowed in a normal court, and parents are condemned on evidence they are not allowed to see.

One such case I compared recently to the Dreyfus affair – which turned on evidence supplied to his judges but withheld from him. Yet in our family courts such travesties of justice are commonplace. I shall return to this particular case in a future column. I must add an update, however, on the case I reported last week, where a mother faced imprisonment because her teenage children, two of them in care, had been communicating on Facebook. On Monday, the judge decided to adjourn the hearing for two months. I can say no more –thanks to that secrecy which conceals abuses of justice just as shocking as anything David Davis and others protested about so eloquently last week.

Comments on this story are disabled for legal reasons.

================================

“Sunday Telegraph” reporter Christopher Bookers articles about the M family ordeal at the hands of Haringey council:

SUNDAY 12 6 11:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8570173/The-mystery-of-Haringeys-missing-Girl-X-makes-a-mockery-of-the-Children-Act.html

The mystery of Haringey’s missing ‘Girl X’ makes a mockery of the Children Act
The family of a girl taken into care have not seen or heard from her for 10 months, writes Christopher Booker.
 
Torn apart: the system of child protection is a national scandal
7:00PM BST 11 Jun 2011
The social workers of Haringey are notorious for having failed to prevent the deaths of Baby P and Victoria Climbié. But in their zeal to avoid any repetition of these tragedies, they are now at the forefront of those councils which have pushed the number of children taken into care to an all-time high. In all the cases I have been following where children have been taken from their families for what seem like dubious reasons, no single instance has been more disturbing than the plight of a 10-year-old girl seized by Haringey last year, who seems in the past 10 months to have vanished off the radar.

“Girl X”, as I shall call her, was taken into care on the basis of three allegations. One turned out to be so laughably erroneous that it was soon dropped; a second was likewise dropped when medical tests completely disproved the council’ s claims. The third, highly questionable, has still not been put to any evidential test.

The last time Girl X was seen by her mother was at a supervised contact session last August. Having complained of sexual abuse by her foster carer’s 19-year-old son, she asked to be given, as a birthday present, a journal with a lock in which she could record her “secret thoughts”. Since that day she has not been seen by her parents or, since the autumn, by her siblings, who are also in care. It seems she has since been interviewed by three people – an independent social worker, an independent psychiatrist and her guardian, all of whom reported that she wished to see and be reunited with her mother.

No one representing the family has been allowed to see her, including the girl’s grandparents, who came from abroad specifically to visit her. Her parents have been forbidden to telephone her or even send a Christmas card. Her whereabouts are a mystery. When I put questions about her to Haringey last year, the council’s only response was to ask for a court order forbidding me to refer to the case at all. (It was not granted.)

What makes all this particularly disturbing is that, in several respects, it seems to defy the Children Act, which insists that councils must do all they can to encourage contact between children taken into care and their parents, who continue to share parental responsibility until a child is adopted. “The responsible authority,” says the Act, “has a duty to endeavour to promote contact” with the parents and “any relative, friend or other person connected to the child”. In particular, parents must be allowed to see medical or school reports relating to their child. The law also insists that, if children are old enough, they should be allowed to appear in court to express their wishes. None of these things has happened.

Related Articles
Industry begins to count the true cost of ‘climate change’
11 Jun 2011
Parents denied a voice in court against the child-snatchers
05 Mar 2011
The real scandal hidden by gags is what goes on in family courts
28 May 2011
How our judges deny human rights to children taken into care
04 Jun 2011

Why – when even Baby P’s mother was last year allowed out of prison to enjoy supervised contact with her surviving children – has Girl X been shut away as a silent prisoner, seemingly denied her rights? What has happened to Girl X?

For legal reasons, comments on this story have been disabled.

========================================
1} CHRISTOPHER BOOKERS SUNDAY TELEGRAPH ARTICLES CONDENSED relating to the M case {excerpts shown where applicable}

A} http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7870342/Forced-adoption-is-a-truly-dreadful-scandal.html 3 July 2010
My last case is so shocking that I will return to it in more detail at a later date. It centres on a London couple who, earlier this year, had their six children seized by social workers on what appears to be flimsy hearsay evidence (I have seen the court papers). The mother was pregnant again. Last month, after the boy was born, three social workers and five policemen entered the hospital ward where she was breastfeeding at 3am, wresting the baby from her by force. They then discovered that they had nowhere to keep him. The boy was put into intensive care, where his mother was taken to breastfeed him for four days, until she was fit to leave the hospital. She saw her baby for the last time two weeks ago. I will return to this story when I have had some explanation from the council responsible.

B} http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7896592/Its-time-to-bring-family-law-to-book.html 17 7 2010

C} http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7946155/Forced-adoption-social-workers-surreal-investigation-recalls-satanic-abuse-scandals.html 14 Aug 2010 This entire article is about the musa family.
“By Christopher Booker 6:39PM BST 17 Jul 2010 107 Comments
I have never, in all my years as a journalist, felt so frustrated as I do over two deeply disturbing stories of apparent injustice that cry out to be reported but which, for legal reasons, I can refer to only in the vaguest terms. To cover them as they deserve, and as the victims so desperately wish, would challenge a part of our legal system shrouded in an almost impenetrable veil of secrecy.
Two weeks ago I recounted four examples of what I described as one of the greatest scandals in Britain today – the seizing of children by social workers from loving families, on what appears to be the flimsiest and most questionable grounds. The children may then be handed on to foster carers, who can receive up to £400 a week for each child, or are put out for adoption, in a way which too often leads to intense distress for both the parents and the children involved.
One case I referred to concerns a north London couple whose five children were seized in April by social workers from Haringey council and sent into foster care. The mother was then pregnant, and her baby was born last month. Shortly afterwards, according to her account, nine police officers and social workers burst into her hospital room at 3am and, as she lay breastfeeding, wrested her baby from her arms with considerable force. Discovering they had nowhere to put the baby, the authorities took it to another part of the hospital, where the mother was escorted four times a day to feed her child, until she was discharged four days later.
Having talked at length to the mother, I found this story so shocking that I put a series of questions to the council, to get their side of the story. The response of Haringey (which, since the national furore over its failure to prevent the battering to death of Baby P, has been somewhat sensitive on these issues) was to ask the High Court to rule that I should not be allowed to write about the case at all. In the end, the court did not go that far, but The Sunday Telegraph was reminded of the comprehensive restrictions on reporting such stories.
After spending several hours with the parents, looking at their neat home, the little beds where their children used to sleep and the cot prepared for the baby, I came away more convinced than ever that something was seriously amiss. I found the wife impressive in her detailed account of the events, clearly a devoted mother who feels herself and her children to have been the victims of an extraordinary error – the nature of which, alas, I cannot reveal.
This week, two days have been set aside for the mother to put her case to a judge. Despite the tragedy that has torn their family apart, the parents have never previously had an opportunity to challenge Haringey council’s version of the story. I only hope the court takes particular care to check out the evidence put before it, and that in due course I can fully report a case that sheds a revealing light on a system supposedly devised to protect the interests of the children but which too often seems to result in the very opposite.
deprived of any right to put their case, not just to the courts but to anyone who might be able to help them.
It is a system hermetically sealed off, in which the fate of parents and children can be decided by an incestuously closed community of social workers, police, lawyers, doctors and other professional “experts”, who all too often seem to work together in an alliance which is ruthlessly oblivious to the interests of the families who fall into its clutches. Again and again I have heard of the misery of children torn from their distraught parents, forced to live unhappily in the hands of inadequate foster carers, and whose only wish is to be returned to those they know and love.
The more I learn about this scandal, the more I understand why, in April, an Appeal Court judge, Lord Aikens, savaged the actions of Devon county council social workers in a forced adoption case as having been “more like Stalin’s Russia or Mao’s China than the west of England”.. The council’s lawyers were told to read a judgment by Lord Justice Wall, now head of the High Court’s Family Division, which condemned Greenwich social workers as “enthusiastic removers of children”.
It is high time the veils of secrecy were ripped from this national outrage; that politicians intervened to call the system to order; and that the press was free to bring properly to light family tragedies such as those I have only been allowed to hint at above.

D} http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8098952/Child-protection-MPs-must-act-on-the-scandal-of-seized-children.html 30 Oct 2010 This is a very general article – not specifically about the M family, but give an idea of what they are going through.

E} http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7946155/Forced-adoption-social-workers-surreal-investigation-recalls-satanic-abuse-scandals.html 14 8 2010
There could have been few more bizarre meetings anywhere in Britain last week than that between a married mother and the social workers who had taken her six young children to place them unhappily in foster care. The officials, of a council I cannot name, are fixated with the idea that this respectable Christian is a “sex worker”, whose children all have different fathers and who is engaged in “child trafficking”.
They appear to have no evidence for these charges other than the hearsay surmising of a single “witness”. I gather that the social workers had reluctantly agreed to commission DNA testing of parents and children, to establish whether they were all from the same father. But even now, I am told, the social workers are refusing to disclose the test results.
The mother, accompanied to this surreal interrogation by a nun who had known her for years, insisted that she had only slept with one man in her life, her husband, the father of her children. She went on to ask one of the social workers how many men she had slept with. The reply was that this was a private matter.
Perhaps we are not very far here from those extraordinary cases some 20 years ago when children were torn away from their families wholesale because social workers had concocted a fantasy that they were being abused in weird satanic rituals (a story I told in my book Scared To Death).
It is vitally important that when this case again comes before the courts, the judge should put the council’s supposed evidence to very careful test.

F} http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8165143/Forced-adoptions-get-no-sympathy-from-the-ministry.html 27 Nov 2010
{nb.:
Last week I listened for an hour to a sobbing mother describing how she recently lost the six-year-old daughter who is the centre of her life.. Her fatal mistake was to ask social workers for advice when she was being troubled by “harassment” from the child’s father, from whom she parted some years ago. Within days, although it was never suggested that she had harmed her daughter in any way, she found herself facing a “case conference” of 20 people at the local council offices, the conclusion of which was that her child must be placed in foster care.
The solicitor she was given by the social workers refused to oppose the care order. At a “contact” session, when she and her bewildered daughter emotionally expressed their love for each other, the interview was halted. She has not been allowed to see her child again.
Having followed dozens of such cases in recent months, which suggest that something has gone horribly wrong with our child protection system, I was recently invited for an off-the-record ministerial discussion about what I have been reporting. But far from recognising that anything might be astray, the official line, it seems, is that the horrifying cases I have covered represent only an untypical minority of the total – “less than 10 per cent”. In general, the system is working fine.
This line seems to be confirmed by the latest guidance issued to local authorities by the Children’s Minister, Tim Loughton, who says that too many councils are failing to ensure that enough children are being adopted, and that the backsliders must speed up their flow of adoptions. No question as to whether social workers might be snatching too many of the wrong children in the first place – or why the courts seem so eager to support them that, of around 8,000 applications made each year for care orders, only one in 400 is refused.
I shall give just one disturbing instance of the latest developments in a case I have been following for months. Like many others, this came to me through the Forced Adoption website, run by former councillor Ian Josephs.. It involves a married couple whose five older children were seized earlier this year, subsequent to which their latest baby was torn from its mother’s arms only hours after it was born.
The bizarre story originally stated by the social workers to justify their ruthless intervention in this family’s life seems to have collapsed. At a recent court hearing, I am told, the judge seemed disposed to reunite the family as soon as possible. The baby was returned to her parents later that day. But the council asked for 21 days’ stay of execution before returning the five older children, three of whom the parents had not been allowed to see for weeks. The judge apparently agreed but insisted that an independent social worker should interview the children.
The independent social worker eventually managed to interview four of the children, apparently reporting that they all wished to be allowed to go home to their parents. But the court refused to give the parents a copy of the judge’s ruling, and on Friday they were summoned back to hear from him that he had now seemingly changed his mind and that the children did not wish to come home after all. According to the parents, they were not allowed to question the evidence on which he based his new ruling, although they were told they could appeal.
What on earth is going on here? Even from the little I am permitted to report of this case, it seems evident that something seriously odd is afoot.
But this is merely one of far too many cases where families are being heartlessly torn apart, often without the parents even being allowed to question the evidence or to speak for themselves. To hear such horror stories being dismissed as representing “less than 10 per cent” of all the cases where children are seized is simply not good enough. Each is shocking enough in its own right. But when every week brings news of a dozen more, this only confirms that we indeed have a national scandal on our hands.

G} http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8181575/Child-protection-how-a-cruel-council-plays-its-cat-and-mouse-game..html 4 12 2010
Last Tuesday I dined in a smart Knightsbridge restaurant with Ian Josephs, who runs the Forced Adoption website, his wife, a mother whom I cannot name and her delightful five-month-old baby, who sat in a high chair perfectly behaved throughout. This was the baby who, shortly after she was born in June, was torn from her mother’s arms in hospital at 3am by six policemen and three social workers. Two months earlier, social workers had also snatched the mother’s five older children, to put them in foster care, costing taxpayers more than £2,000 a week.
On Tuesday afternoon, the mother had been unexpectedly told that she could have contact with two of her children, miles from north London where she lives. Yet again, when she arrived at the contact centre, she was told that the children were not coming, although apparently they long to see her. On returning to the station with her baby, given back to her by the court six weeks ago, she found that all trains had been cancelled because of the snow, forcing her to return to London by taxi at a cost of £50.
This was yet another instalment of a cat and mouse game the council has been playing with the parents for months, telling them they can see their children, only for them frequently to hear, after their long journey, that some or all of the children were not available after all. (It happened again last Friday.)
Months ago the court ordered that the children should be brought back into London, nearer their home. Meanwhile, the council should give the parents a travel voucher, worth more than £30 a time, for their journey. Only once did the council provide a voucher, which the parents discovered on the return journey was one-way only, costing them £100 in penalties.
Since then the court order has been ignored and the parents have had to pay up to £150 a week to see their children, only to be told on arrival that the agreed contact has been cancelled.Meanwhile, the case used to justify the seizing of the children has been collapsing in all directions, although the parents have not once been allowed to challenge the extraordinary statements made about them. Not until next year, 10 months after this family was ruthlessly broken up, will there be a final hearing to decide whether this utterly heartless farce can at last be brought to an end. If and when the facts about this barely credible story can be reported, it will be worthy of the front page.

H} http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8196452/Social-workers-cruel-game-with-children-in-care-continues.html 11 12 2010
Last week I reported on the cruel cat-and-mouse game a north London council is playing with the parents of five children who, against court orders, have been kept in foster care miles from their home. Several times a week, at a cost of more than £40, including taxis, the mother, carrying her five-month-old baby, travels to an agreed contact with her unhappy children, only to be told on arrival that they are not available. In the past fortnight this has happened six times.
Why cannot the mother be told this before she leaves home? Last week, the fostering agency Capstone Vision claimed that the fault for this outrageous behaviour lies with the council social workers, who seem determined to punish the mother for the fact that all their original excuses for seizing the children have been exposed as malicious fictions

J} http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8211955/Does-this-family-have-human-rights.html 18 12 2010
Two senior judges of the immigration court rule it illegal, under the Human Rights Act, to deport an asylum seeker who dragged along under his car a dying 12-year-old girl he had run over – because it would be in breach of his right to enjoy “family life” with his children (even though he no longer lives with them).
How strikingly this contrasts with the suffering inflicted on those parents whose five children, as reported here more than once, were snatched from them last April by London social workers, on suspicions which have since, it appears, turned out to be malicious fabrications.
A council whistleblower has said that, at a recent case conference, the social workers admitted that maybe they had made a mistake, and that the mother they had falsely accused was in fact devoted and blameless. But apparently, because of “press interest” in the case, the officials agreed that the council could not afford the very damaging publicity which might follow if the unhappy children were reunited with their parents. It was therefore vital that the council should continue to justify its actions.
The case comes up again in court very soon. In the name of this family’s human rights, it must be hoped that the judge examines the evidence very carefully indeed.

K} http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8363501/Parents-denied-a-voice-in-court-against-the-child-snatchers.html 5 3 2011
One of the most disturbing features of this system, which protects itself behind a wall of secrecy, is how far it goes to ensure that aggrieved parents are represented only by lawyers who are themselves accomplices of the system. Again and again parents are bemused to find that the lawyers they were advised to use seem unwilling to challenge the case being made against them, however spurious.
Of all the cases I have followed, none is more bizarre than that of a couple whose six children were snatched by social workers last year on evidence which seemed at best highly questionable and was at worst an absurd fiction. The mother was advised to use a solicitor, on legal aid, who she felt was so much on the other side that she discharged him. Just before Christmas, when the council’s case seemed to be falling apart, I tracked down one of the very rare solicitors who has a reputation for fighting the system.. His firm applied to the Legal Services Commission for transfer of the legal aid, and when the LSC seemed to be delaying its response, I paid £2,000 from my own pocket to enable the firm to start work.
The local authority learned, it seemed before anyone else, that the LSC would not allow the transfer from the solicitor who had been discharged – and the head of the council’s legal department then sent the mother a list of other solicitors who would be able to take her case on legal aid. By the time the solicitor to whom I had given £2,000 heard that he had been turned down, he was able to present me with a bill which, including VAT, came to exactly £2,000.
By now another solicitor had appeared, who seemed keen to take on the case for a reduced fee. Ian Josephs, who runs the Forced Adoption website, advanced £3,500 towards her fees, on an understanding that she could take the case through to its final hearing for a total of £5,000. Three days before they were due in court, this solicitor too – after a long conversation with one of the array of lawyers appearing, at huge public expense, for the other side – said she was unable to continue working on the case. She has not, so far, offered to return any of the money.
The mother now faces, without legal representation, a final hearing which could result in her losing her children forever. They live, unhappily, in separate foster homes, at a cost to the taxpayer of well over £100,000 a year. She and her husband came to this country a decade ago, full of hope: now she feels utterly betrayed by a system which seems ruthlessly bent on destroying her family. Her only wish is to escape this incomprehensible nightmare and return with her husband to their native country. But to do so, they would have to abandon any hope of seeing their beloved children again..

{It is understood Mr. Booker has now been restrained in certain ways from reporting again on certain aspects of this case.}

 

a3

ImageProxyAbove:  Bishop Gloria and Chiwar Musa with Maurice Kirk, outside the Royal Courts of Justice, September 2011, where the Musas had gone for an appeal on the day – they lost, of course.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

NB: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.

 

About butlincat

my blog: http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com http://www.youtube.com/butlincat http://www.twitter.com/butlincat
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s