PETER HOFSCHROER: FORCED EXTRADITION TO AUSTRIA + archive

ph-3nov16 Peter at the 3 Nov. hearing at Marylebone Mag. court – it was adjourned until the 10 Nov.

Peter’s extradition hearing went ahead on the 10th Nov. and he was ordered to be returned to Austria to face possible charges there, and was – horror of horrors – remanded to HMP Wandsworth, I found out only today. Anyone whose had the misfortune to have to taste prison tea in a 15 x 15 cell will know Wandsworth is the worst and strictest jail in London – it is serious. A real hellhole 10 times worse than the others which are in comparison holiday camps. Usually this HMP is reserved for the more serious clientele who go on holiday there.

If he had to be remanded at all he should’ve gone to HMP Brixton at worst – a remand prison wholly – very lenient – or even more properly an immigration centre like Colnbrook [where Musa was supposed to go but they messed that up] or Harmondsworth or somewhere where extraditionees + returnees are supposed to go – but Peter has charges pending in Austria though even baseless and unproven and a dodgy Austrian false psych report – his legal reps have let him down so badly again, and surely should’ve gone to somwhere like for Colnbrook I. C.[it is closed not open but much more lenient than a prison] and he pays for it even by having to wait probably months in strict Wandsworth if an appeal is on the cards. His legal team let him down badly there. And this Wandsworth time probably won’t be taken into consideration anywhere at anytime now his UK jail time is done.

PETER HOFSCHROER’S EXTRADITION HEARING IS ON NOV. 3 AT MARYLEBONE MAGISTRATES COURT

PETER HOFSCHROER’S EXTRADITION HEARING IS ON NOV. 3 AT MARYLEBONE MAGISTRATES COURT – nearest underground tube station: Marylebone. [N.B. Marylebone court IS Westminster court – the same place = City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court – Wikipedia The City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court was a magistrates’ court located at 70 Horseferry … replaced on 27 September 2011 with Westminster Magistrates’ Court, built on the site of Marylebone Magistrates’ Court at 181 Marylebone Road].

Update 22 Oct.  Peter was granted bail on the 20 Oct. and has been released.

Update 16 Sept. They couldn’t manage to produce Peter for yesterday’s extradition hearing – everything adjourned until 3 November. However, Peter looked well during a short hastily arranged video link where he was told the new date.
Excellent turnout.

Update 14 Sept. 16:  Peter confirms that he will be there on the 15 Sept. 16 @ Westminster Magistrates Court @ 2.30pm, but its best to check for changes as near that time as possible.

Update 10 Sept. 16: Peter states that he hopefully will be present on the 15th’s hearing in London. But as always its best to call WESTMINSTER MAGISTRATES COURT as we know how they play games…expect the unexpected always!!
STILL no news about or from his mother – Grandma B – this despicable situation of being denied contact with his own mother has gone on for so long – since mid-2015 or even before – all concocted by government departments / Yorks SS / and others…
Again he states lawyers have let him down badly, especially the CoP, who are “messing him about”. One cannot make a leopard change its spots!!

ph3

Above: Peter being arrested by plain-clothes after turning up at the Yorks. court in early December 2014. He has been in custody ever since, until Oct. 20 2016.

The extradition hearing to Austria went ahead on the 15 September 16 at WESTMINSTER  MAGISTRATES COURT at 2pm. This September date did not bring the end to a near 2 year imprisonment which began December 2014. 

It is important to note that objections to the Warrant were not put forward regarding Article 6, which states:

  1. “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interest of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice.
  2. Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.
  3. Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights:
  1. (a) to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him;

(b) to have adequate time and the facilities for the preparation of his defence;

(c) to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require;

(d) to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;

(e) to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court.”

As worryingly is the fact that P states his home in Austria cannot be sold until P has passed, and as certain characters, it is alleged, will be wanting their pay-off regarding their parts in the conspiracy to imprison and persecute P, and all connected to that, P”s disappearance will follow once he is ensconced in the Austrian asylum, should the Extradition Warrant be executed.   P’s death must be stopped from happening at all costs.

 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………
  

THE SCANDAL OF GRANDMA B – THE RADIO I’VIEW BACK ONLINE – MUST LISTEN!! 1 Dec. 2012 

https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/the-scandal-of-grandma-b-the-radio-iview-back-online-must-listen/

……………………………………………………………………………………………….
 
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

PETER HOFSCHROER TRIAL: 8 JULY 16

“Peter Hofschroer trial: Historian claims he had evidence about Jimmy Savile” + archive

Posted on July 6, 2016 by

824a3-1fraud038247f6-2fraud039

STOP THE FRAUD ON THE COURT!!  see more: 

https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/stop-fraud-on-the-court-in-the-uk

……………………………………………………………………………………………..

8 July: Peter Hofschroer trial: Historian claims he had evidence about Jimmy Savile

A HISTORIAN accused of downloading tens of thousands of sexual images of children has claimed he is a man of integrity.

Peter Anthony Hofschroer, 60, who specialises in the Napoleonic Wars, denied that he had used a Prussian regiment name for an account on a website of indecent images, carried out internet searches for illegal images or downloaded a story about children having sex with each other.

He claimed he was the victim of a conspiracy between a fellow military historian who won defamatory damages in a court case against him, the judge in that case and a Duke; and that he had evidence of senior people linked to North Yorkshire Police engaging in al fresco sex with Jimmy Savile on the North York Moors.

He denied he had been discredited through civil injunctions brought against him by the military historian and North Yorkshire Police. 

“Sometimes I get things wrong, sometimes I tell a little white lie – I am a human being – but I am a man of integrity. My record is not unblemished, but it is cleaner than most,” he claimed at Teesside Crown Court.

“You are a paedophile,” alleged Peter Hampton for the prosecution. He replied: “No I am not”.

Hofschroer, of no fixed address and formerly of Rosedale Avenue, Acomb, denies 16 charges of downloading sexual images of children.

The charges relate to more than 36,000 pictures and videos found on computers in his former office in Acomb, on his laptop and in a computer tower found in a car he rented.  The trial continues.

In evidence, he denied causing a family rift when he moved to York in 2008. 

The jury have heard technical evidence that the images were downloaded from 1997 to 2014 and that when he was arrested, he accused the interviewing officers of being sex offenders.

In cross-examination, Mr Hampton alleged that whenever anyone challenged Hofschroer he got very angry with them. 

“When anyone spends years persecuting me, I lose my temper,” he replied.

The barrister said: “You make people’s lives hell.”

“Oh, really, what have these people done to my mother and I – nine years of persecution,” he replied. 

“To distract from what you are really up to,” said Mr Hampton. 

Hofschroer laughed: “What I am really up to?” Mr Hampton said: “Looking at images of little boys.”

Earlier, he had denied that when he was arrested at York Magistrates Court, he tried to stop police taking a laptop he had with him, knowing it had more than 20,000 indecent images of children on it.

“I would have been insane walking into that situation anticipating being arrested with incriminating evidence on my laptop”, he claimed, adding the laptop contained evidence of police corruption he didn’t want officers to see. 

He had been about to prosecute three of his relatives and claims the images were planted on the computer later. 

Day 3 report: Historian claims he was framed by brother and police

A HISTORIAN has claimed his brother and North Yorkshire Police collaborated to frame him as having indecent images of children. 

Peter Anthony Hofschroer, 60, alleged he was the victim of serial harassment by police and social services and that they have refused to investigate his complaints against them.

He was giving evidence at  his trial on 16 charges of possessing indecent images of children. The prosecution allege he had more than 36,000 sexual pictures and videos of children ranging from the least to most serious on computers and laptops seized by police twice, two years apart. 

Hofschroer, of no fixed address and formerly of Rosedale Avenue, Acomb, denies all 16 charges. 

He claimed at Teesside Crown Court that he had been living in Austria with his mother in December 2012 when police seized computers from the Acomb house where he and his parent had been living until late 2009. The jury have heard that computer experts found nearly 7,000 illegal sexual images of children on them.

“I am not sure the computers the police seized were actually mine,” he claimed. 

He alleged his brother Robert falsely told police that the computer towers he had left at the house had been stolen in a 2011 burglary, and that family members had taken his possessions from the house without his permission. 

In July 2011, he had arranged for bailiffs to make an inventory of items in the house. 

“And suddenly there were the two computers there, that had been reported stolen. They had dramatically reappeared with indecent images on them. What a surprise,” he alleged. 

He alleged that through work in the computer games industry, he was aware of ways images could be put on to computer equipment. 

Robert Hofschroer had earlier alleged to the jury the towers had not been stolen in the burglary and denied putting images on them. Both he and North Yorkshire Police deny all Hofschroer’s allegations against them. 

The trial continues.  

Peter Hofschroer claimed he had logged 200 incidents of harassment by North Yorkshire Police and North Yorkshire social services, and that he and his mother had been unable to return to York  for years after they went for a Christmas holiday in Austria because they were intimidated into not returning. 

————————————————

NB: The information “Peter is “of no fixed abode” only because his home in Austria was sold behind his back and without his permission whilst he was on remand, since Dec. 1014, awaiting this trial, to which, it is alleged, his legal team let him down very badly in many areas” was got from P’s earlier communications, from P himself,  but it appears this info was incorrect, and his home in Austria is yet to be sold, according to later communications from P.

 Nevertheless, his mother’s home was sold [Google “Grandma B” – Barbara Hofschroer – who has been denied contact with Peter since December 2015] – see Lord Maginnis making a plea in Parliament and the response he got from fellow Parliamentarians, including the Ministry of Justice, in 2012 – nothing!! – LORD MAGINNIS – PARLIAMENTARY SPEECH RE: THE SHOCKING HOFSCHROER CASES 15/05/2012  – WATCH VIDEO:   https://vid.me/Ia27

THE RADIO INTERVIEWS:

Please see this radio show to hear Peter tell the story in a nutshell – well, a lot of it = Radio interview with Peter on “Anonymous Radio” December 2012 – thanks to C. Jarvis, radio host: 

https://vid.me/e/9bVD?stats=1&tools=1  

2 interviews with Sonia Poulton + the Hofschroers: dated: 15 Jan 2014 = 

  https://www.vimeo.com/84524221

+ 3 Feb. 2014:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PER__Kx-EP

———————————————–

Breaking News: Peter’s prison – Staff walk out:

http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/holme-house-governor-prison-officers-11578962

140

————————————————————-

7 July 2016: Peter Hofschroer trial: Police and my brother framed me, he claims

Man goes on trial accused of having 36,000 indecent images of children

Man goes on trial accused of having 36,000 indecent images of children

7 July 2016

A HISTORIAN has claimed his brother and North Yorkshire Police collaborated to frame him as having indecent images of children. 

Peter Anthony Hofschroer, 60, alleged he was the victim of serial harassment by police and social services and that they have refused to investigate his complaints against them.

He was giving evidence at  his trial on 16 charges of possessing indecent images of children. The prosecution allege he had more than 36,000 sexual pictures and videos of children ranging from the least to most serious on computers and laptops seized by police twice, two years apart. 

Hofschroer, of no fixed address and formerly of Rosedale Avenue, Acomb, denies all 16 charges. 

He claimed at Teesside Crown Court that he had been living in Austria with his mother in December 2012 when police seized computers from the Acomb house where he and his parent had been living until late 2009. The jury have heard that computer experts found nearly 7,000 illegal sexual images of children on them.

“I am not sure the computers the police seized were actually mine,” he claimed. 

He alleged his brother Robert falsely told police that the computer towers he had left at the house had been stolen in a 2011 burglary, and that family members had taken his possessions from the house without his permission. 

In July 2011, he had arranged for bailiffs to make an inventory of items in the house. 

“And suddenly there were the two computers there, that had been reported stolen. They had dramatically reappeared with indecent images on them. What a surprise,” he alleged. 

He alleged that through work in the computer games industry, he was aware of ways images could be put on to computer equipment. 

Robert Hofschroer had earlier alleged to the jury the towers had not been stolen in the burglary and denied putting images on them. Both he and North Yorkshire Police deny all Hofschroer’s allegations against them. 

The trial continues.

PETER HOFSCHROER TRIAL “He made life hell, says his brother…” 5 July 16

DAY 2 REPORT: 5 JULY 2016 1 day ago / Megi Rychlikova

A RESPECTED military historian harassed his family, made criminal allegations against them, sued them in the courts and ruined them financially, a jury heard.
Martin Hofschroer alleged he had to change his job after his uncle Peter Hofschroer contacted his employer, alleging he was a pervert, a fraudster and a criminal.
Martin’s father Robert claimed relationships within the family were fine until his brother moved into York to look after their parents.
“After that it was hell, to be plain, it was hell.” he alleged. 

Peter Hofschroer claims both men have conspired with North Yorkshire Police to frame him with sexual offences. He also claims North Yorkshire Police officers are corrupt and child abusers. Both men and the police deny the conspiracy and Peter Hofschroer’s allegations against them.
Fellow military historian and long-term friend David Pinder of Mirfield, West Yorkshire, described Peter Hofschroer as a “well-renowned” author of many books on military history.
Peter Hofschroer, 60 of no fixed address, denies 16 charges of downloading indecent images of children.
The charges relate to more than 36,000 pictures and videos on computer equipment seized from the Hofschroer family home in Rosedale Avenue, Acomb, on December 7, 2012, from a laptop carried by Peter Hofschroer at York Magistrates Court on December 1, 2014, and on computer equipment found in an Irish car driven by Peter Hofschroer in November and December 2014.
The jury has heard when some of the charges were laid, Peter Hofschroer told officers among other things: “Your police force is utterly corrupt”, “I am an investigative journalist, you are trying to stitch me up”, “have you ever tried to catch a real criminal” and “I have enough evidence to put half of you in jail.”
Giving evidence for the prosecution, Martin Hofschroer alleged at Teesside Crown Court: “He makes allegations against anyone involved in this. He has made allegations against North Yorkshire Police, North Yorkshire County Council, North Yorkshire social services, 
“He emailed my employer saying I was a pervert, I was involved in fraud and I was a criminal as well. I left that job down to this and I went to work elsewhere.
“We have spent as a family thousands and thousands of pounds in legal costs. We have lost our money. He has financially ruined us and we need our money back.”
He alleged the family was making a legal agreement over the proceeds of the sale of an Austrian house Peter Hofschroer had transferred to him and his sister in trust to avoid liabilities after the 60-year-old ran up a £30,000 legal bill through losing a civil court case.
The jury heard Peter Hofschroer made a similar arrangement regarding his half share of the house in Rosedale Avenue about the same time and that the house was at the centre of a row between him and his brother Robert.
Giving evidence through a sign language interpreter, Robert Hofschroer, who is deaf and 64, alleged he had very little knowledge of computers other than writing letters and that he had no idea how to plant downloaded indecent images on computer equipment.
Robert Hofschroer also alleged that when he wrote a letter to his mother in Austria, Peter Hofschroer wrote on the envelope in German: “not known here, return to sender”.
The trial continues.

Day 1 report: Man goes on trial accused of having 36,000 indecent images of children

A HISTORIAN who tried to prosecute his own relatives has gone on trial accused of having more than 36,000 indecent images of children.
Peter Anthony Hofschroer had a laptop with more than 20,000 illegal sexual pictures and videos when he arrived at York Magistrates Court on December 2, 2014, said Peter Hampton, prosecuting.
He was about to be the prosecutor in a case against his brother, with whom he had a long-running family dispute over the care of their elderly parents. He had more illegal images on computer equipment in his car.
Police were waiting at court to arrest him in connection with nearly 7,000 indecent images and videos of children found at his then home in Rosedale Avenue, Acomb, two years earlier. He had been out of the country when they carried out a search warrant, but returned to the UK to start the case against his family.
Mr Hampton alleged at Teesside Crown Court: “This defendant is a man who has a sexual interest in children. In order to satisfy that desire, he downloads indecent images onto his computer for his own sexual gratification.”
Hofschroer, 60, of no fixed address, denies 16 charges of downloading indecent images of children. They cover more than 36,000 videos and pictures ranging from the lowest to the most serious categories of illegal pornography.
Opening the prosecution, Mr Hampton said the defence does not dispute that the indecent images found on two computer hard drives and two computer towers in his home on December 7, 2012, on the laptop he was carrying at court on December 1, 2014, and on a laptop and a computer tower in his car, also in December 2014, were illegal.
“The ultimate question in this case is who put the images on the computers we are talking about,” Mr Hampton told the jury.
Hofschroer is expected to claim he is “the victim of an elaborate and cunning conspiracy by his brother and his nephew who have, in fact, framed him by putting those images found in 2012 on his computer equipment without his knowledge,” said the barrister.
“He will tell you he is the victim of a further conspiracy,” said Mr Hampton. “He will suggest to you that this includes police officers employed by North Yorkshire Police who have fabricated evidence against him ….. and that they did so for reasons I am sure he will explain, to discredit him.”
Mr Hampton alleged that when police tried to arrest Hofschroer at York Magistrates Court he became abusive and tried to claim that the bag he was carrying containing a laptop was not his. Analysis of the 2012 computer equipment revealed some of the images were stored in a file called Peter/pics/….. and that the only user account on one of the computer with indecent images was called “Peter. The images found on the 2012 equipment had been downloaded over a ten-year period.
Someone using an account on one of the seized computers called “Peter H” had used a website known to police for hosting and making available illegal images of children within a minute of accessing an Austrian bank account. Hofschroer has Austrian connections, alleged Mr Hampton.
The analysis also revealed someone had used search terms relating to sexual activity with or by children on some of the seized equipment.

————————————————————————————

THE ABUSE OF GRANDMA B – TIMELINE OF THE MAIN EVENTS

JANUARY 2007 – Grandma B and her late husband Paul sign over their house to Robert and his family in return for the promise of care support.

APRIL 2008 – Paul is admitted to hospital seriously ill. Peter returns to the parental home from Austria and finds that both his parents are suffering from neglect. He takes over their care.

MAY 2008 – Robert commences his aggressive efforts to seize his parents’ life savings.

JUNE 2008 – Paul returns home from hospital. Robert and his family refuse to provide any care for Paul and Barbara, forcing Peter to give up his home and career to do so.

AUGUST 2008 – Peter reports the abuse to York SS and the crime to NYP. They refuse to act, then start their campaign of persecution of Barbara, Paul and Peter.

SEPTEMBER 2008 onwards – Robert starts stalking Barbara and Peter. NYP refuse to act.

DECEMBER 2008 – On Christmas Day, Robert and his family breach the peace outside Barbara’s house, terrifying Paul , who is ill in bed. NYP refuse to act.

JANUARY 2009 – Paul dies. Robert and his family charge into his house, assault Barbara and Peter, then bawl abuse at them and Paul’s corpse. NYP threaten to arrest Peter.

MAY 2009 – A stage 2 investigation into York SS finds largely in Barbara’s favour, ordering the safeguarding investigation to be reopened.

JULY 2009 – York SS hold a safeguarding meeting at which they refuse to consider the evidence of abuse and crime, and refuse to act.

OCTOBER 2009 – Barbara and Peter hand out a leaflet at a ward meeting protesting at the failure of NYP and York SS to act. NYP threatens to arrest them.

NOVEMBER 2009 – NYP issues the first Harassment Warning against Peter. (In 2014, this and all other allegations of harassment are withdrawn due to lack of evidence.)

DECEMBER 2009 – Barbara and Peter go to Austria for a holiday.

FEBRUARY 2010 – York SS and NYP establish Barbara and Peter are in Austria. They tip off Robert, who then breaks into Barbara’s house, change the locks and steal Barbara’s belongings. York SS and NYP refuse to act.

DECEMBER 2010 – Robert commences his first attempt to fraudulently sell Barbara’s house. Her solicitors prevent this.

JANUARY 2011 – Robert and NYP attempt to have Peter arrested in Austria for ‘kidnapping’ Barbara. The Austrian police investigate and find no evidence.

JUNE 2011 – Bailiffs acting on behalf of Barbara regain control of her house and she prepares to return home. NYP and York SS refuse to safeguard her.

MAY 2012 – Lord Maginnis raises this case in Parliament. He states he has substantial evidence to show that NYP, York SS and Robert are colluding to defraud Barbara of her house. The government refuses to act.

JUNE 2012 – NYP threaten to arrest Peter. The Austrian judiciary declares him to “lack mental capacity” to prevent him from litigating against Barbara’s abusers.

JULY 2012 – Robert breaks into Barbara’s house again, changes the locks and withholds the key.

DECEMBER 2012 – Robert makes his next attempt to fraudulently sell Barbara’s house. Her solicitors prevent this.

JULY 2013 – Bradford County Court issues an injunction stopping Robert from making any further attempt to sell Barbara’s house.

AUGUST 2013 – The Austrian judiciary declare that Peter is suffering from incurable paranoia and appoint an attorney to run his affairs. Peter is later examined by a psychiatrist, who establishes that he is perfectly sane.

SEPTEMBER 2013 – The Austrian judiciary order that Peter be detained under section. Barbara and Peter leave Austria for Germany where the authorities grant them “persecuted persons” status.

MAY 2014 – German police raid Barbara’s refuge without lawful reason and hand her over to Robert. Peter is detained for four hours, then released without charge. Robert takes Barbara to York, where he recommences his abuse of her.

DECEMBER 2014 – Peter returns to the UK to undertake legal action to safeguard Barbara. He is ambushed by her abusers and imprisoned without lawful reason.

AUGUST 2015 – Robert deposits Barbara in a “care” home against her will and fraudulently sells her house. Barbara suffers several life-threatening injuries as a result of negligence.

OCTOBER 2015 – York SS starts proceedings in the Court of Protection to prevent her friends and Peter from having any contact with Barbara. Barbara is so severely injured due to wilful negligence that she requires major surgery and is crippled.

JANUARY 2016 – Peter is due to stand trial at Teeside Crown Court on 4th January.

https://grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/

——————————————————————————

PETER HOFSCHROER Jan. 16 update:

 All statements in this message are alleged:
Peter’s trial has been put at July 2016 – because his new “barrister” had not had the time to prepare for the case, while the new solicitors had not got it trial ready despite having months to do so. [outrageous!]. Requests for a bail application continue to be refused. [Why?].
 
Peter has no idea where his mother Barbara is and no idea how she is because noone will tell him. Cards / letters wishing this elderly and much persucuted 87 yr-old lady  well can be sent to her via:
Mrs Barbara Hofschroer, c/o Adult Social Care Team, West Offices, Station Rise, YORK YO1 6GA. It is said she was supposed to be being moved to a “specialist unit”, but noone knows, apart from the council etc., if this has happened.
Please write to her at that address and let her know she is not alone.  We are told she is now bedridden and permanently crippled due to “falls” at a “care home” she was in. Serious surgery followed on a broken leg. She also contracted pneumonia recently [a “chest ailment”]. Needless to say we have a list of commendations regarding her care whilst she was with P and in his care. It is a public scandal what has happened to her since leaving P’s care, and even since Lord Maginnis’s protest in parliament in 2012, which was completely ignored by all authorities. Lord Maginnis has been updated more than once but declines to now acknowledge this case in any way. Pls. see below re: Maginnis.
 
A deal was offered to P whereby if he plead “guilty” he would be released. Peter declined – “it will take more than keeping him in jail to shut him up”, it is alleged.
 
Due to P’s move to HMP Holme House, due to the [postponed] trial, communications are disrupted getting to him. His address is now, but unknown for how much longer, is: P. Hofschroer, A3324DJ, 3-A-1-11, HMP Holme House, Holme House Rd., Stockton-on-Tees, TS18 2QU. 
Peter thanks his supporters for their continuing support.  

THE “SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICE” – [S.F.O.]

It is particularly nauseating and unacceptable 
that the Serious Fraud Office – their reply to info telling them, for instance, of the sales of both Barbara Hofschroer’s and Peter Hofschroer’s homes [houses] against their owners will, they state that they can only act in cases, and I quote, where:
a] “cases where the potential or actual loss is high” – aren’t the sales of 2 homes sold for hundreds of thousands of £GBP [against their owners will] high enough? Of course they were! Or will they only look after the rich and famous in our land?
b]  “cases where actual or potential harm is significant” Both Peter and his mother are now without their homes [even though his mother has now been put in care], them having been forcibly sold, and P states he is homeless and penniless as a result. This conforms to “harm”!
and
c] “cases where there is a significant public interest element and a new species of fraud” – surely a “new species of fraud” is selling someone’s house and its contents behind their backs while they are in prison on remand on allegedly questionable charges, unable to lift a finger to prevent anything from happening to their properties!  Also, surely there is much public interest surrounding Peter’s and Barbara’s cases – them being wholly corrupt [allegedly]!!! Peter’s elder alleged “serial criminal” brother [as he has been described] – a ringleader, it is alleged, of this nefarious cabal at the root of these alleged crimes P + his mother find themselves victims to – has already allegedly sold the listed building of the Yorks Deaf Society! – the resulting enquiry results 
being impossible to find. 
SFO 444REDACT 17SEPT15077 

GRANDMA B CRIPPLED BY YORK SS

[allegedly] – from A. Non.

We have recently been given sight of York Social Services’ files on the case of Barbara Hofschroer (Grandma B), which are very disturbing.

To recap, some years ago Grandma B was targeted by a criminal gang that includes North Yorkshire Police (NYP), York SS and certain family members, including her older son Robert Hofschroer, who runs York Deaf Society (funded by York Council). As Lord Maginnis has pointed out in Parliament, this gang has colluded to defraud her of her assets and has spent years persecuting both her and her loyal son and carer Peter Hofschroer.

When Grandma B and Peter went on holiday to Austria at the end of 2009, York SS, NYP and Robert seized her house, then went on to make several attempts to fraudulently sell it.

Grandma B then made considerable efforts to regain control of her house so she could return home to spend the remainder of her years living there in peace and safety.

In December 2010, the Local Government Ombudsman instructed York SS to reopen the safeguarding investigation into her case. York SS ignored this, as this would have exposed the racket that they and NYP are running, in which they are systematically targeting isolated old people, seizing their houses, dumping them in homes, then killing them off.

York SS was party to having Grandma B kidnapped in May 2014 from her refuge in Germany to prevent her from continuing to litigate to recover control of her house so she could return home.

After trying in vain to rescue his mother from abroad through the due process of law, Peter returned to the UK in December 2014 to pursue private prosecutions against his mother’s abusers in York Magistrates’ Court.

Peter suspected he was walking into a trap and one was indeed sprung. He was ambushed as he walked into the court building. Since then, he has been held in custody in HMP Hull without lawful reason. He is due to go on trial at Teeside Crown Court from 4th January 2016 where he is facing obviously bogus allegations of the possession of indecent images.

As the trial judge HHJ Ashurst is a close associate of certain of Grandma B’s abusers, we do not expect justice to be done.

Once Peter was safely out of the way, Grandma B’s abusers deposited her in a “care” home run by York SS, then fraudulently sold her house, pocketing the money.

Since being at the tender mercy of her persecutors in York SS, Grandma B has suffered several life-threatening injuries due to their wilful negligence. This includes a deep-vein thrombosis and two falls. The most recent fall was so serious that major surgery was needed. Grandma B is now crippled and bed-ridden as a result of this.

We are very concerned about Grandma B. The treatment she has received at the hands of her abusers is frighteningly predictable: She was kidnapped to prevent her from continuing litigation to recover control of her house. She was then stripped of her assets. Now she is being run down until she dies from “natural causes”.

This is not much different from the way the Jews were treated in the Third Reich.

Persecuted, then imprisoned, then stripped of their assets, then executed.

We know from Lord Hardie’s report on the implementation of the Mental Capacity Act that there are likely to be tens of thousands of victims of state-organised abuse of vulnerable people.

Is anybody safe in Brave, New World Britain?

https://grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/

—————————————-

About butlincat

my blog: http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com http://www.youtube.com/butlincat http://www.twitter.com/butlincat
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s