4th Police Dr Tegwyn Williams Trial in 7 days

Despite this my 1st March 2017 police interview, alleging my  4th breach of a restraining order never served on me in the first place, my request for police disclosure of vital relevant court records remains denied.

No police disclosure of the original 1st December 2011 court records, recording I was served a restraining order in cells, of course, as they had been quickly tampered with following my 1st jury having specifically asked for them in my 4th May 2012 first alleged breach of a restraining order unlawfully obtained.

17 03 01 4th RO police interview

12 05 04 Judge Ignored Jury Note

20 08 30 2nd Def response to amend claim17 08 15 response to 1st D req


11 06 10 Barbara Wilding WANTED

Retired Chief Constable

The trial judge, for next week, has already refused me my relevant witnesses which may, to some, indicate the politics lying behind all this apparent triviality but the Cardiff cabal are seeking a maximum prison sentence.

The Royal Courts of Justice have already made comment over  my twenty five year running battle for compensation following the first of my thirty three police failed malicious prosecutions during my time as a veterinary surgeon in the Vale of Glamorgan.

To be continued……(just going for a swim with Nick R in the River Derwent).

17 09 05 Chatsworth swim.jpg

Who is the Mystery Police Psychiatrist?

I am just in receipt of a document at last forced out of  Cardiff’s so called Justice Centre now allowing me to publish…..

Cardiff Courts Manager


16 th March 2017

Dear Sir/Madam,

Case no. 1CF03361 (Dr Tegwyn Williams/machine-gun trial)

In the light of little if no disclosure of the evidence you control being given up to me, for trial, may I then be expected for a candid and detailed reply to the following for any further potential hearings?

1. After my acquittal requiring no defence evidence for the South Wales Police’s malicious prosecution, re ‘being in possession of a machine-gun’, I and members of my family received alarming feed-back from nine of the disgusted jury.

2. All of them were extremely suspicious of the only juror who had refused to discuss the case each day, over two weeks and had appeared to be the ‘police informer’. Coupled with the ‘Foxy’ faked police officer, trying to buy the ‘gun’, it is in keeping with other such conduct I seem to witness in your so-called ‘courts of law’.

3. I require the Ministry of Justice’s procedure laid down for selecting judges and jurors and a copy of the actual records of when you selected them for my January 2010 Crown court trial.

4. I also require copy of the transcript and court log for any future case relating to it.

5. Previously jurors have asked for sight of court records only to be refused. Why is that?

6. On no less than seven occasions your courts have denied my access to any of your buildings despite my being a party in the proceedings without legal representation. Why is that?

7. Following the concocted ‘machine-gun’ trial your court continues to protect the South Wales Police by not allowing me any effective civil redress or remedy. Why is that if not perverse?

8. Following the ‘machine-gun’ trial I was mysteriously no longer a dangerous MAPPA level 3 category 3 registered victim nor suffering from a psychological disorder to concern the Civil Aviation Authority. Why was that if not also concocted by the Crown Prosecution Service?

9. Following acquittal, I was diagnosed with ‘no cancer’ nor ‘significant brain damage’ and even found a surgeon now prepared to carry out my long overdue hip replacement. Why?

10. Are you prepared to give evidence, on oath, in these matters without subpoena?


Maurice J Kirk BVSc


FAO Cardiff Crown Court:

17 09 04 MJK letter to Cardiff Crown

14 10 11 P10 Probation recall

20 08 30 2nd Def amend claim rebuttal

17 09 04 MJK letter to Cardiff Crown

16 05 31 2nd Def appl for directions hearing

17 08 31 1st Def response to amended claim

It is also riddled with lies supplied by Welsh prisons and the South Wales Police……..what a bloody joke!

As with the vindictive police’s 33 failed malicious prosecutions public scandal, constituting now of the BS614159 one million pound claim plus numerous other civil damages claims and all still deliberately delayed at every turn , here we now have a another bunch of concocted lies from the HM Justice Ministry in London.

Why the deceit?  Because once again this important government department has been repeatedly lied to by the welsh police protected by Cardiff’s cabal of shysters

Extract of e-mail to Crown court for next week’s jury trial

Please find enclosed Claimant responses to 2nd & 3rd Defendant’s amended defences but while all three Defendants refuse to disclose relevant evidence then the Claimant will  remain in difficulties.

The Defendant’s joint plan is obviously  with the police to withhold this relevant evidence as it is also needed in both this civil claim and for their criminal proceedings against the Claimant on 12th Sept 2017 at Cardiff Crown Court for 4th alleged breach of a restraining order never served on me in the first place.

16 04 08 Defence

16 04 10 Parole SWP req judgment

16 05 16 Parole Board Def Dctns Q

16 09 07 amended parole Board Particulars of Claim

17 08 08 cl response to Parole 3d

17 08 31 2nd Def appl for directions heari

17 09 01 Cl response to 2nd Def amended defence

It stinks, as Dad would say.




FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:

NB: DISCLAIMER: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.


About butlincat

my butlincats blog: [2 a/cs : pink cat logo is main a/c, winking cat logo is secondary] linkedin -
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.