The Shocking Carol Woods Coverup: Lancs. police still refuse to acknowledge the illegal “vehicular tracking device” and other serious crimes against Carol Woods 11 Sept. 17 + archive

Regarding the illegal “tracking device” installed in Carol Wood’s motor vehicle, and despite CW’s asking for obligatory information from Lancs. police regarding this device after her paying the proper “Freedom of Information” request fee at Lancs. police Hutton HQ in January 2017 was totally ignored, Lancs. police wanted a letter of permission, finally, from CW so I could interact with Lancs. police on her behalf so my complaint regarding this “tracking device” being installed in Carol Woods motor vehicle [and other matters] could be taken seriously.

One original contact with Lancs. police was 6 months ago in March 2017 [below], which was ignored, as was every other communication sent until I contacted 3 chief constables a couple of months later regarding not being able to report serious crime to the police, which was also ignored by all sent to, so then I had no choice but to begin complaining about that. The “Investigations Support Dept.” of Lancs. police answered finally recently [below] requiring for a “letter of permission” from Carol Woods so as I could interact on her behalf regarding matters. Now, after that “letter of permission” was finally received in writing from CW, and sent to Lancs. police as per their recent request received after 5 months from when this subject originally began from this end, still nothing is done by Lancs. police Professional Standards and “Investigations Dept” about this “tracking device”!

The recent  communication from the “Investigation Support” dept.”, Lancs. police:

The “letter of permission” from Carol Woods, dated 24 August 17, sent 25 Aug. 17 to Lancs. police by recorded delivery 1st class Royal Mail, still unacknowledged by Lancs. police:

The original communication from March 2017 to the then Lancs. police chief constable re: the “tracking device” in CW’s car. All other communications re: this subject and reporting serious crime ignored by all police contacted – including my local police and 3 chief constables, until 2 local officers visited myself on Saturday 9 June 17 at 9pm [approx.]  claiming they would report my wanting to report matters concerning Carol Woods to Lancs. police, and CW would be contacted by Lancs. police. Of course no such contact was made to CW from Lancs. police:

“From:  Mr. J. Graham, [redacted]

To:  Mr.  S. Finnegan,  Chief Constable of Lancashire Police,
Lancashire Constabulary Headquarters,
Saunders Lane,
Hutton nr Preston,
PR4 5SB.

31 March 2017

Dear Mr. Finnegan,

I am writing to you concening the tracking device installed in the motor vehicle used by Ms. CAROL WOODS.

Ms Carol Woods address is:  28 Fell View, Caton, Lancashire, LA2 9RP.

I’m sure you are aware that regarding Ms. Woods motor vehicle, not only does such a device installed in her vehicle contavene 1] the Data Protection Act 1998, but also contravenes Ms. Woods rights according to 2] the European Commission of Human Rights [E.C.H.R.] – please see below:

1] The Data Protection Act 1998:

“The UK vehicle tracker laws fall under the category of processing personal data and accordingly, it is governed by the Data Protection Act 1988. In order to ensure vehicle tracking legality, it is vital that organisations maintain a vehicle tracking policy that is fully transparent and compliant with the Data Protection Act. Under this Act, persons who have tracking devices installed in the vehicles they own have the right to know what information is being held about them and the purpose for which it will be used. For this reason, collecting data covertly is considered to be in breach of the law.
Furthermore, personal data can only be processed if at least one of the following applies:
•The person concerned must have consented to the process
•There is a contractual or legal obligation to process the data
•It is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the subject”.

PLEASE NOTE: a] Ms. Woods did not consent to the process of her motor vehicle being tracked, and

b] Ms. Woods has the right to know what information is being held about her and the purpose for which it will be used, but she has never been told anything regarding her motor vehicle being tracked.


2] The European Court of Human Rights “Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides a right to respect for one’s “private and family life, his home and his correspondence”

1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.”

PLEASE NOTE:  referring to the European Court of Human Rights, Article 8:
Ms. Woods right to privacy has clearly been breached by the interference of this tracking device installed in her motor vehicle.

Mr. Finnegan, it is clear that such a tracking device installed in Ms. Woods motor vehicle is in clear breach of these 2 statutes cited above, and in the respect of trying to obtain information regarding this tracking device, Ms. Woods states:
 “I have asked specifically for the data in relation to PERMISSION for GPS sought and then gained, and paid £10

but received nothing. I TOOK my £10 in Jan 2017 after asking if I needed to pay £10 via Jan this year, it was acknowledged as received as I drove all the way to HUTTON HQ, to deliver it (I asked them to formally acknowledge receipt) as well as getting a receipt there at the front desk”. Therefore Ms. Woods has applied for the information regarding the tracking device in her vehicle, but not received any information in return – an extremely serious irregularity. Can you please remove this device from Ms. Woods motor vehicle that is clearly falling foul of the statutes in place – those being the Data Protection Act 1998  and the Article 8 of the European Commission of Human Rights?

Mr. Finnegan, failure to acknowledge this communication will result in my contacting the highest authorities regarding these breaches of the said statutes stated above.

Thank you.

J. Graham  concerned citizen” [ENDS]

Complaints were made to the IPCC regarding not being able to report serious crimes, which included the installation of the “tracking device” in CW’s vehicle, Dorset Police hanging up in me when being contacted by them regarding reporting serious crimes pertaining to CW, and Lancs. police ignoring communications to them over the months, and not responding after the 2 Dorset officers who visited myself on 9 June 17 claiming they would be contacting Lancs. police who would then be contacting Carol Woods [no such contact was made, naturally] – below is my complaint to the IPCC and their response – which was to pass everything back to Lancs. police, who were stonewalling in the first place, and, apparently, still are!:

26 June 2017 at 22:45
Dear Ms. Coulton,
Here, below, is my latest communication to yourself in reply to your message to me, dated 22 June 17.
 I DO wish to report as stated to the I.P.C.C. the matters described.
Thank you.
J. Graham  concerned citzen
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: !enquiries <>
Date: 22 June 2017 at 12:32
Subject: IPCC Reference – xxxxxxx

To: “” <>Dear Mr Graham

Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). We acknowledge receipt of your email dated 13 June 2017, the contents of which have been filed under the above reference number.

I note from your email that you are unhappy with the police, however it is not clear if you are wishing to submit a formal complaint against the police.

If you wish to make a new complaint or allegation of misconduct against a serving member of the police then the IPCC can forward it on your behalf to the relevant police force. If you do wish to make such a complaint or allegation we will need to be provided with the following information;

WHO? Which police force is your complaint about?

WHERE? Where did the incident/s happen that led to your complaint?

WHEN? When did the incident/s happen that led to your complaint?

WHAT? Please describe the circumstances that have led to you feeling the police have treated you badly.

If however you do not wish to make a new complaint or allegation of misconduct, or submit an appeal against a concluded investigation into a previous complaint I do not believe the IPCC can assist you any further at this time.

Please note that all complaints made to the IPCC by law must be forwarded to the ‘appropriate authority’ for consideration – usually this is the Professional Standards Department (PSD) of the police force concerned. When you submit your complaint in full your details will be passed onto the PSD for consideration.

Yours sincerely

Customer Contact Advisor Independent Police Complaints Commission

(IPCC)———- Forwarded message ———-
From: butlincat <>
Date: 23 June 2017 at 11:14
Subject: IPCC Reference – 2017/087595


I do wish to raise a complaint against Lancs police

​ – specifically Mr. ​S. ​Finnegan C​hief Constable as he refuses to answer numerous messages to him,
​specifically the one shown below dated 31 March 17, and against also their Professional Standards, who are mentioned in the attached  response ​[letter] from Lancs police – they still have not contacted me as promised.
J. Graham

The above communication was replied to in full – the end result being that everything was passed back to Lancs. police – the entire process beginning in March 2017 and continuing without any progress whatsoever as I write in 11 September 2017.

Meanwhile, the Home Office states to send everything regarding this “tracking device” to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal – the letter dated 31 August 17, something that Carol did already – her comment: 

Date: 5 September 2017 at 15:46
Subject: Re: Fwd: Win cw

Hi thanks for this; firstly, I have 3 huge files from the Gestapo from 2002 when they claimed to the IPT that they had never heard of me and that I had never lived in Lancaster. That led to all sorts which included the IPT ceasing the FULL INQUIRY into my case after NATIONAL news bulletin April 2006, “The government has ordered an inquiry into how Lancashire conducts its affairs”. The Gestapo spoiled all that: the IPT just returned my file to me with no comments. It was March 2008 JUST THE WEEK MIKE TODD WAS MURDERED when the IPT told me in a letter that they thought Carol Woods was an alias and that I was really someone else somewhere else, my sister in fact.” [ENDS]

The above are just part of numerous communications to and from UK government departments regarding the appalling and illegal targeting of Carol Woods by certain UK government personnel paid by the taxpayer to act in a responsible and honest manner, which include, especially, the police – local to Ms. Woods and the main force, the county council and all connected, with others – including Royal Mail, who refuse to do anything regarding Carol’s mail being deliberately diverted and misdelivered, or delivered to her months later – or not delivered at all.

To be continued

Archive continues: 

The Shocking Carol Woods Coverup: Royal Mail Irregularities continue, “the use of my dead mother in FRAUD” – 07 Sept. 17 + archive

Carol Woods = “It is a highly complex matter which the police organise where they try to make me someone I am not. They have in fact tried to invent me as the reverse of myself using numerous characters, including “neighbours” who live alongside myself, and others elsewhere – the entire situations going back years. I find things out because I am not stupid. See my original w’blowing blog York LGO Blog re Lancashire CC you will see why I am hounded by lowlife RECRUITED to do that by the Gestapo. Carol Woods Ms.”

Carol writes, 07/09/17:

“I am wading through the police data and find huge amounts of false documents claiming I was in 28 Fell View YEARS ago and that will be to say Mrs Greenbank was not bullied to death so I could have it for 2014.

I find letters sent to me in MY house from agencies which are not copies, they are the original letters which the police have copied to send to me, how have they got original copies of mail sent to me to recent? DVLA told me a while ago that they had written to me at my address but that the letter had not been returned as “return to sender”. I also have evidence that psycho cop false friend Janet Woodall was storing on her computer what I typed and printed and that explains why she was so encouraging for me to use her computer; it was to claim she was me with my letters as typed and printed yet saved for her USB. (I knew little then in 2007 as to how things worked.) I find I was right about the Uni scanner; not only have they watching what I scanned as I knew from 2012 but they have been saving and the proof of that ILLEGAL ACTIVITY is now without doubt kindly supplied by themselves.

I have evidence that they have been writing to me at MY house when they knew I wasn’t there, but why keep writing? Under normal circs the first would be RTS and they wouldn’t bother again? This is what they do now. Agnes Jackson in 26 is getting MAIL INTENDED FOR ME to which she responds and I am having trouble still with the old lecher in 30 pretending I am his horrendous wife.

BUT in 2010 in the illegal detention then, where they tried to persuade me to admit myself, I was told I exaggerated about the wrecking of my house. (In 2015 in that illegal detention, I was told I made it up and my photos apparently did not exist and all my neighbours were liars) and there it is on the police records; the report that MY car stolen by their garage (yet they told me they had no idea where my car was and it took me miles and days of trailing round every single place in the area, industrial estates, every garage and so on until 1 garage tipped me off about the police garage which I never would have found at all, that was Jan 2009 and bitterly cold) and decent police went to my house to see about my report of my car “disappearing” and they describe my house: presumably they exaggerate as well. Presumably the document is more scotch mist as my photos apparently are. Their stupidity never fails to amaze me. They allocated an incident number when I sent an email to the Commissioner, how dare I? Lunatics abound. MY response is that this is a democracy and we have freedom opf speech. The usual today asider from collective harassment round Fell View with thugs from 23 in frame, the fraudsters in 22 so obviously found out, and 24 etc. Then of course I drive to Morecambe and the usual Audi’s and 4 wheel drives amass where I am usually parked to then walk and they pretend whatever their delusions allow.

The ICO has been on to them again and been told that I will be sent the rest. I am sure I was to send an email about what was obviously missing so they could manufacture more. I’m not telling them what is missing until they have confirmed I have it all. On the police data it is recorded a few times that I could not accept my house REPOSSESSED. It is recorded that I simply “gave it up”, it is recorded that COURT DEBTS were how I “lost it”, so, we have 3 reasons there, I wait for more. C”

The use of my dead mother in FRAUD Lancs.  07 Sept. 17

carol woods 

to contact, policing.minis., privateoffice.., privateoffice, look.north, ministers, me, bae146, varas,, cat_smith, haveyoursay, info, david.lidingon.,,, andy.rhodes, chiefexecutive, homeaffcom, fieldf, telegraphedito.,, scallywagmagaz., hammondp, burnhama

 A shake of the kaleidoscope. Another day where “I” Ms Carol Woods apparently just moved in and not only to 32 Fell View but also to 33 as usual. Regular readers know I apparently move into 33 the unoccupied house at least 5 times every week and have done so from March 2014 when I moved to rent 28 Fell View. By 10pm on 23/8/27, the usual council sleazy, parked in hiding had driven off after assuming I had retired for the night and pretended to drive me to another address; apparently I live in 2 places at once. I wait for them to drive a mile or more away and then reinstate what I want; it is obvious I have not left 28 for another address. By 10am on 24th MORE council sleazy drove to wait outside me in 28 and PRETEND to drop me off as Mrs Invisible. On photos, no one alighted at all. The photos with this show some of the lunacy of 23 Aug 2017.
The car black Mitsubishi Colt seen was parked on a small area between 32 and 34 Fell View which space is enough for cars at 26/28/30/32 plus the odd visitor. It is out of sight of me in 28 and I do not use the space preferring to park outside 28. I could smell a fraud immediately with this and a light grey Peugeot PK62 NXJ. My vast experiences tell me much. PF08 did not move for months; I wrote to the council and said that this car and PK62 NXJ had better not be anything to do with me. Thus by July 2014, after my letter, PF08 started to be driven off some days. And this is what it revealed: the digit 2 from 32 had been painted out to make it seem to be 3. I had moved from Flat 3 Penhale Gardens and this malicious old trout in 32 was PRETENDING she had been me in the flat. In the flat, the council and Gestapo had pretended I was not me at all but had others in flats 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10 especially, claim to be me. (Out of 24 flats, hardly any tenant did not take part in fraud and looting of the dead.) Thus the car had to be something to do with me. I found she was MARY LAMB and claimed to be MY DEAD MOTHER with the car bought in FRAUD as if I was her daughter, driving her about. That all found out and reported, Y211 AAO arrived at 32, 2/1/15 and drove her out as if she needed a driver.

On those occasions, PF08 had always “disappeared” for a few days at a time. He was HUDDLESTON from 39 Copy Lane at the end of Fell View, not one minute’s walk from Lamb in 32. I had reason to believe he was a retired, bent cop. He had been filmed stalking me from soon after I moved in and I saw his vehicle at 45 Fell View every night to about 9pm which went on for months. I found the unemployed in 45 was a Mrs MARGARET DALTON and ANOTHER to be pretending to be me needing a driver. Dalton data is separate and sent out with its own photos. Thus, Huddlestone drove about Lamb for the one occasion then continued pestering me. He would drive off as my car passed which is still done using others as my car is imaginary, apparently. Huddleston was moved out of 39 Copy Lane amid a great ‘clear out’ end 2015 into 2016 when many thieves, fraudsters and worse needed to be “covered for”. (There had been a great ‘clear out’ end 2014 into 2015 as well when the DWP frauds were uncovered which was why Huddleston was sent to try and cover for Lamb and her fraud.) The Gestapo seeing I had found out what 32 was being used for, sleazy council in PE56 NXB arrived to drive Lamb about with PF08 “disappearing” for a few more days. The council sleazy had been pretending with at least 2 others that I lived in 41 Fell View with JARVIS and they paid her to pretend to drive me about and be “carer”, she as a total stranger and really a few letters short of a key board BUT at least 2 bank accounts had to have been set up to allow that to take place. PE08 ZRX was another regular sleazy to be involved in the fraud at 41 and she also started in 2016 to pretend to drive about Lamb and all the time as if Lamb was me as MY DEAD MOTHER.

Example: on 30/8/14 Y211 AAO had driven out Dalton again, it was ALWAYS shopping and I suggest she paid for none of it. He then parked right opposite me (my car seen) and pretended it was I he had taken out. I went to take my photo and he drove off. 30/7/15 a day of lunacy involving at least 6 houses and various fraudsters round Fell View, this sleazy who is one to park at 37 Fell View and lie across the front seats of her car to pretend she not seen is indoors with someone – me. The car, OEO8 AHF I had not seen parked up with the driver hiding in 32; they see me go to my car and drive off along Fell View towards the low numbers so, not passing 32 thus not seeing. BUT I have a rear view mirror and saw Lamb peeping out round hedging (since cut down) to see that I was leaving thus this sleazy was safe to drive off the opposite direction and PRETEND she had met with someone – me again.

On 4/10/16 this car, AE65 FDZ I saw outside me, no sign of the driver; I could smell corruption. I took the photo and a woman I would say was Gestapo appeared from nowhere; she was to pretend she had been indoors with me as her car was seen right outside me. She drove off. An hour or so later, I saw cars on the space after 32 and found a squad car PLUS this one again: they were Gestapo and indoors in 32 PRETENDING she was me and had just moved to Fell View. She had obviously raced back to Lancaster station and asked what she should do to cover that found out wasted police time with intent. She was provided with a PCSO. (I have photos of them leaving 32 when she saw me outside checking the small car park.) They were trying to rewrite PCSO Dennis Nelson sent to a thief and looter of the dead in flat 5 Penhale Gardens, 5 Sept 2013 and pretending that horrendous old parasite was me having recently moved to the flats. I had moved to Flat 3 on 1/7/13 and it is apparently policy for the Gestapo to call to explain how to keep oneself safe; I knew they would not call on me and hadn’t; then they saw their omission and used the looter in Flat 5 to pretend she was me. This was what they tried to repeat using Lamb who has been in 32 for decades. They knew she had but pretended she was me as my dead mother having just moved in again.

On 23/8/17 Lamb was dropped off by someone who pretended she needed a driver again. Lamb I have seen many times driving PF08 WDJ, I have seen her pretend to be shopping for Dalton in 45, I have seen her out with Williams in 30 where she claims to be the mother and Williams claimed to be me as the daughter. (There is about 10 years age difference between those 2!) I have seen O’Conner in 39 Fell View who also claims with her FIVE cars to be me as well as being herself and having at least 2 addresses in fraud, driving PF08 WDJ about. Local yobs, one at least with no licence and no insurance from 45 Fell View, son of Mrs M Dalton, has driven PF08 WDJ many times to hide locally so that it seems as if Lamb is out when she is not. The motive then is for her to use her phone with Williams and claim she was not indoors so someone else must be using the phone; that will be me I guess. Lamb is a malicious old fraudster, vacant between the ears and I would suggest she has not worked in all her life and finally thinks MI6 employs her; she is not so stupid that she does not know what GAINS in FRAUD ARE. Please feel free to quote me. Carol Woods Ms.

Archive continues at:

The Shocking Carol Woods Coverup: Infinite ID frauds, shockingly all funded by the taxpayer, all covered up 2 Sept. 17 + archive

Some Background:

Carol Woods = “It is a highly complex matter which the police organise where they try to make me someone I am not. They have in fact tried to invent me as the reverse of myself using numerous characters, including “neighbours” who live alongside myself, and others elsewhere – the entire situations going back years. I find things out because I am not stupid. See my original w’blowing blog York LGO Blog re Lancashire CC you will see why I am hounded by lowlife RECRUITED to do that by the Gestapo. Carol Woods Ms.”

Apart from numerous and longstanding ID frauds [where goods and other services have been obtained by dubious “neighbours” in her locale using Carol Wood’s ID, much obtained via her stolen mail – something Royal Mail has been notified about an infinite amount of times, with no proper response at all] and along with many other serious crimes enacted in her name [see the list below in the section entitled “Some Background, below] Carol Woods is stalked daily by her neighbours who are, it is very strongly alleged, employed by the local police and other factions of Lancs. county council. Ms. Woods is particularly targeted at the library which she has to use for the use of the computers therein, as having computers and phones etc. at her home has proven futile because of them being hacked by the same individuals who hack the library computers whenever she uses them. These unemployed, mostly male yobs, in the pay of the police etc. to surveille Ms. Woods [it is very strongly alleged], openly sit alongside her in the library, mobile phones in their hands while they hack the computer Ms. Woods is using, scanning and interfering with whichever emails to and from Ms. Woods they see fit, amongst other electronic interference.

What is particularly appalling also is that – apart from the Royal Mail letters being deliberately misdelivered to criminal neighbours etc. – so many serious crimes committed against Ms. Woods have been refused being reported for years now, to the police and other government agencies, including the IPCC who do nothing when told about complaints involving Lancs. police. Apart from Ms. Woods continually contacting police departments and politicians and other government agencies, other supporters have contacted UK Government departments regarding the serious crimes Ms. Woods is victim of, I personally have approached 3 different chief constables of 3 different police forces to no avail, and the IPCC have been complained to regarding this lack of duty by police employees – the IPCC merely passing my concerns back to the force allegedly behind the bulk of so many of the very strongly alleged crimes – Lancs. police. Contacting these UK Government departments has proven a complete waste of time, such is the coverup involved to do with so much of what is very strongly alleged concerning Ms. Carol Woods.

The posts and updates from Ms. Woods on this site alone detail this harassment from Ms. Woods neighbours along with detailing many of the numerous crimes committed since Febuary 2016 when Ms. Woods was forcibly detained for no reason other than to silence her in a mental unit, for the 5th time. As there were no proper grounds for Ms. Woods to be held in the mental unit, she was released after protests were made. This enforced kidnapping of Ms. Woods was the 5th time such a kidnapping had occurred to Ms. Woods because of the input by certain authorities who completely shirk their responsibilities and cover up serious crime – eg. employing and paying from the public purse criminals who flout the law by  stalking Ms. Woods almost daily, and every time Ms. Woods leaves her abode, and also enabling them to partake in numerous ID frauds completely outside of the law, and much more – the reporting of numerous DWP benefit frauds and connected to the DWP fraud department, and to the banks – Barclays and Santander – who had numerous accounts in false names to launder the DWP monies gained illegally, proving a complete waste of time also.

Some background:

In the latest posts and in the archive linked, Carol  goes into greater detail regarding what she is having to experience from those around her, all with, it seems, the full cooperation and assistance of the local authorities who command the numerous crimes and the actions of the numerous lowlife stalkers she is surrounded by.  Not only do these nightmare neighbours she is surrounded by steal her landline telephone and internet delivery lines running into her house, and misuse it on an almost daily basis by the lines being previously diverted to their more than likely ramshackle homes, they also steal her electricity too when they can [when Carol switches it on], and much more. Carol can hear her neighbours testing their electricity sockets after she has turned her power on from the main switch in her home. For this very reason her electricity supply is having to be almost permanently switched off for fear of it being hacked by these criminal neighbours, she lives by candlelight and she has had to live electricity free in her home for years because of these lowlives’ thieving alongside her home – many of them doting and ageing pensioners who steal her services because they can and do not get criminally charged with anything – courtesy of the fake authoritarian figures in place who should be in prison rather than be sitting pretty in a government office somewhere, local or otherwise. Fake IDs used by so many – if not all – of Carol’s criminal neighbours pay for many things through fake bank accounts, the money all ultimately coming from the UK taxpayer – the general public, as are the new cars given as rewards to certain neighbours paid for the same way – the road tax etc for these cars also paid for by the UK public, as are the numerous “Blue Badge” schemes many of these cars are concessioned with – all registered via false details but paid for out of the public purse. Authorities do nothing when told about these scams – how much longer can these outright crimes continue? 

Regarding the internet and phone lines running into her abode: Carol even witnessed the rewiring of such to cater for her neighbours criminal thieving when she came back home from being out one day – the lines being rearranged and diverted into her loft where the neighbour’s connections take place, and thus the ability for these thieves to steal her services. A bit of  detail about this stealing of Carol’s services – when Carol came back from being out one day, she noticed an ironing board, of all things, leaning against a wall in one of her rooms which wasn’t there before she’d gone out. On moving the ironing board, there on the wall was – crudely written in biro or whatever – the electrician or whoever’s drawing for the rewiring of the phone + internet lines being diverted into her loft – for the use of the thieving neighbours as already described. This is why, when out on later outings to wherever, tell-tale ironing boards would be left deliberately en route – leaning against walls or whatever – for Carol not to miss. Such is the cruelty of the minds involved in this entire gangstalking scenario CW is having and has had to put up with for so many years. Does any authority  do anything about any of this stealing of her phone or internet services when they’re notified? No they don’t – the same way as the CEO of Royal Mail ignores all notifications to him regarding misdeliveries of CW’s mail to assorted neighbours [see earlier posts on this]. Other authorities also contemptuously ignore other notifications of gross irregularities / crimes sent to them. Why? Go figure. Semantic battles with the R. Mail’s current CEO proved pointless when trying to report the numerous and longstanding deliberate misdeliveries of mail to the neighbours who give CW such a hard time. As for these loutish neighbours and their hostilities, it’s hard to argue, for example, when someone wearing a police officer’s uniform making out they’re a police officer is intimidating one and breathing down one’s neck giving one preposterous orders to harass and hurt a fellow citizen – but harass and hurt they do, putting aside any semblance of conscience or, dare I say it – guilt. Perhaps the gift of a new car – or two – paid for by the UK taxpayers – eases their conscience and helps these sad characters turn the other cheek and commit serious crime and also stalk so inhumanly someone who devoted her entire working life in service to others – as Carol has – trying to help children especially. These lowlives – and the lowlives controlling all the conspiracies against Carol Woods – have much to answer for, and let’s hope that day comes soon when they get their comeuppance – noone likes a corrupt traitor, especially those who are in the positions they’re in, whose sky-high wages are paid by the UK taxpayer, and its funny how things turn around and come back ten times worse for those perpetrating these obscenities. But that’s noone’s problem but theirs.

It is completely unjust and as outrageous and unfair that I am refused reporting – by 3 separate police forces – serious crimes, as correspondence, or rather ignored correspondences to these 3 police forces, would show [UPDATE 24 JUNE 17 – a few days ago – at 20.53BST on the evening of Saturday 17 June, to be exact, 2 Dorset officers knocked on my door without any forewarning [after my now numerous messages to the Chief Constable]and although unprepared, I duly gave them such info as I could regarding the huge number of crimes listed so far as detailed by and committed against CW. After 50 minutes, one of the officers promised me that “Lancs. police would be got in touch with, with a view for them to contact CW”. Of course I immediately protested that, allegedly, the Lancs. police were one of the very parties behind this series of numerous ongoing crimes, and to do such would be a waste of time. Note that this has been tried before when Lancs. police have been told of certain crimes pertaining to CW by CW, and nothing has been done at all. Nevertheless, this was all I could expect, apparently. Who knows if anything was passed on to Lancs. police, and even if it was, will anything be done about anything? It is now weeks since Dorset police were informed that night of 17 June, and Ms. Woods harassment continues unabated – so the evidence points to the fact that nothing has been done regarding what was reported to those 2 Dorset police officers]. If one complains to higher authorities about this completely unacceptable situation, I would guess that the targeting I am experiencing almost on a daily basis – whenever I go out – would escalate to an unacceptable level, causing me to fear for my very own life. That is why also the updates from CW have been drastically curtailed here. So be it. William Burroughs, the great author, once said that if a person didn’t want to catch malaria, one shouldn’t go to an area where malaria is rife. I seemed to have stumbled into something similar. So be that also…

The question has been asked: “why would the “Powers That Be” target someone such as Carol Woods for so long [since 2006], involving so many perpetrators, committing so many serious crimes, funded by the public and local council taxpayers?”. Carol Woods is a 63 years old former Lancashire County Council Level 3 Social Worker and Child Protection Officer [who used to train social workers] and a former Probation Officer, amongst many other things. Perhaps the appalling and chronic targeting she has no choice but to put up with 24/7 is because she reported numerous seriously grave irregularities she discovered, including child abuse, when being employed by Lancashire county council, as described in the “IMPORTANT VIDEOS” at the foot of this post, and also because of what Carol has reported, especially here, from Feb. 2007:   “York LGO Blog and Lancashire CC” More is described here:   “Harassment as punishment for whistle-blowing: Lancashire”

When one realises that the very controllers of the targeting and stalking Carol is forced to endure are, very probably, very closely connected to the same departments and personnel who are described in the links above and the “IMPORTANT VIDEOS” shown below, which detail what was discovered when Carol worked as a Child Protection officer in Lancashire, then it should not be hard to understand these hostilities enacted against her. Put it this way: the Welsh scientist, weapons expert and authority on biological warfare, employed by the British Ministry of Defence David Kelly was supposed to have leaked serious information to the detriment of the PTB at the time – look what happened to him. Now, Carol is no weapons expert, but one doesn’t have to be one to upset the proverbial apple cart bigtime. And anyway, we are told there have been assassination attempts upon her life too – quite a few in fact, including ramming her car at speed, on a main road, by perpetrators unknown…well, almost unknown.

And why is there an illegal tracking device installed in Ms. Woods car – put there, apparently – by Lancs. police? The Chief Constable of Lancashire has been written to so many times about so many serious matters with no response it’s quite remarkable. Another 2 chief constables have been written to asking can serious crime be reported to their forces also with no response whatsoever, and I have tried on more than one occasion to notify my local police about serious crime at my local central police station to be totally ignored every visit, which is just another public scandal!

Many more serious crimes and misdemeanours committed against Ms. Woods are all completely ignored by whichever UK government agency one tries to take anything to, including: 

many murder attempts,

impersonation, ID frauds,

person[s] impersonating police officers in official government hearings, [or hearing[s]  purporting to be official],

Royal Mail frauds,

monetary frauds involving: dubious bank accounts at numerous high street banks, the DWP, town council[s] and other agencies,

illegal tracking of motor vehicle via GPS device [or similar],

a high number of motor vehicle “Blue Badge” [UK HM Government concession] frauds,

regular physical harassment / mental torture upon a person [aka “gangstalking”],

telephone / Internet Broadband  / electricity supply fraud,

wrongful arrest,

wrongful kidnapping[s] / incarceration[s] in UK HM Government units, police station[s], HM Prison[s] etc.,

home burglaries, 

– many other instances of serious crime and illegal activity exist, and many acts contravening not only the Data Protection Act 1998, but also the contravention of articles pertaining to the European Commission of Human Rights [particularly Article 8].

What is going on is maybe unbelievable, and at times complicated, but that is surely deliberate and part of this outrageous targeting of a law-abiding citizen  – a lone female – who dared to report serious irregularities she found during her employment as a Level 3 social worker and Child Protection Officer. As a result, apart from the crimes committed against her as described, her house and contents with a value of £400,000+ was stolen from her, and her employment tribunal award of £50,000 found its way to someone who conspired against her who fraudulently took Carol Wood’s ID. Other serious crimes exist and continue to  this very day…



2] Please listen to this vital radio show interview with Ms. Woods from the 12 March 2016

3] CAROL WOODS WHISTLEBLOWER ON RADIO lancashire police corruption county council 06 Febuary 2016 


 SriLankerC 24 April 2016

6] Carol Woods Social Worker Unlawfully Incarcerated In Psychiatric Gulag   – 16 April 2016 by  GeorgeGreekTrucker


FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:

NB: DISCLAIMER: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.


About butlincat

my blog:
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Shocking Carol Woods Coverup: Lancs. police still refuse to acknowledge the illegal “vehicular tracking device” and other serious crimes against Carol Woods 11 Sept. 17 + archive

  1. Pingback: The Shocking Carol Woods Coverup: Lancs. police still refuse to acknowledge the illegal “vehicular tracking device” and other serious crimes against Carol Woods 11 Sept. 17 + archive | HOLLIE GREIG JUSTICE

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.