The Carol Woods Coverup: OUTRAGEOUS: Police Bribery / court corruption / M. Todd’s murder 08 Jan. 2018 + archive

Some Background to the targeting of Carol Woods:

Carol Woods = “It is a highly complex matter which the police organise where they try to make me someone I am not. They have in fact tried to invent me as the reverse of myself using numerous characters, including “neighbours” who live alongside myself, and others elsewhere – the entire situations going back years. I find things out because I am not stupid. See my original w’blowing blog York LGO Blog re Lancashire CC you will see why I am hounded by lowlife RECRUITED to do that by the Gestapo.

More is described here:   “Harassment as punishment for whistle-blowing: Lancashire”


Police bribery/court corruption/M Todd’s murder 08 Jan. 2018

carol woods

to brian, garry.shewan, ian.pilling, ian.hopkins, chris.packer, andy.rhodes, peter.lawson, privateoffice.., policing.minis., look.north, bae146, me, contact, hq-professiona., alex.doncaster,, editor, customerinvest., susan.acland-h., privateoffice, david.lidingto.,,,, justine.greeni. + more

Dear Sirs,

Attached I resend the “witness statement” of DC JANE WEBB for a case of mine which she produces ONE YEAR after the purported date. Found to be PERJURY in that hearing, NOTHING was done except I was shouted at demeaned, insulted and so forth for finding WEBB and Lancashire County Council “witnesses” were ALL caught as perjurers.
“You are getting people struck off, you are getting people sent to prison”. I protested: I had not asked them to commit perjury and manufacture LIBEL to offer as SWORN testimony. WEBB had not appeared: this was entered and testified on by Tanya V Griffiths barrister (totally ignorant of any law at all,) but in this DS ANDREW RIGBY of GMP sent to start the prosecutions on ALL this laughed when he saw my evidence saying he had never seen as much. That went on and why he was BRIBED when Lancs saw ILLEGALLY via email what we were corresponding via email on.
At the same time MY case related file with the London Met. was being investigated after the allocated crime number and senior officer was assigned. PAUL STEPHENSON then left Lancs police and went as deputy comm to the MET and put a stop to all that.
Without going into all that, I will add also that WEBB had not only tried to cover for an UNQUALIFIED MANAGER OF LCC SOCIAL SERVICES WITH A FALSE CV AND CLAIMS TO QUALIFICATIONS THAT DID NOT EXIST and committed perjury but the matter was a serious case of child sex abuse; a 12 year old girl with serious learning difficulties and her 13 year old brother.
WEBB was annoyed that she had been wrong in all that and I had been right.
The girl at a special school wrote 6 SIX letters to her teacher when all this started to blow up. WEBB went with a social worker to the family house (the social worker was corrupt and had no common sense or natural intelligence at all) and between them they separated mum and the girl and tried to interview the girl alone putting words into her mouth.
I told WEBB the ANDREW involved was the offender and she ignored that letting him loose into the community.
The girl named him saying how he had told her not to say anything. The letters were written in pencil; her teacher sent for me, I copied the letters and added them to the file AFTER showing the UNQUALIFIED MANAGER PAT ALLEN PRESTON TEAm GREENBANK ST. I then passed the originals to WEBB.
In my case the tribunal ordered the release of the files to me, and I found they had been greatly altered to benefit of Social Services and to the detriment of the family. THE LETTERS HAD ALL DISAPPEARED. WEBB HAD DESTROYED THE ORIGINALS PASSED TO HER AS WELL AS THEY DID NOT CONFIRM WHAT ACTIONS SHE HAD TAKEN WITH THE WRONG PERSON.
Anyone can ask questions that arise. But I decline obviously to name the family. They are STILL keen to get a result for the terrible treatment they received at the hands of Social Services.
STEVE FINNEGAN knew all this after PS left left.
Please feel free to quote me, these are MY documents and as data subject I own the copyright and publishing rights.
TINA was my friend until late 2009 when she was bribed to “forget” her part in all this. She was only 1 witness to the perjury. Tina does not live at the address on her statement which statement was ignored in the follow on massive cover up.
The chairman who ordered the release of files of me was removed by LCC and an UNQUALIFIED idiot was planted in her place. ALL knew of this and no one has done anything EXCEPT MIKE TODD who was then murdered for his efforts.
I am Carol Woods Ms under duress at 28 Fell View LA2 9RP sorry I have no phone whatever yob the Gestapo has pestering and stalking me especially in the local library with their phones pretending links to me. Mail theft is RIFE. Personal callers welcome with full ID. Personal callers could also call at the other 24 addresses of lunatics who ALL claim to be me in a sort of shift rota. My car X165 YUB red Toyota Yaris. Naturally there was much more to swept under the carpet such as the corporate manslaughter, the illegal seizure of 134 acres of land, closure and seizure of a working farm, school etc ALL as in my whistle-blowing and the family here were not the only one to suffer dreadfully.


The Carol Woods Coverup: I.P.T. [Investigatory Powers Tribunal] refuse to respond to the installation of the illegal tracking device in Carol Wood’s car by Lancs. police – CAR VANDALISED: POLICE DO NOTHING – 23 Dec. 17 + archive

After sending the latest complaint by way of 20 pages of printed notes [pic above] by recorded delivery to the IPT [Investigatory Powers Tribunal] regarding the illegal installing of a GPS device in Carol Wood’s car by Lancs. police, and then phoning them weeks later [as I’d had no acknowledgement to the 20 pages] and finding out they “hadn’t received” these notes, despite the recorded delivery being signed for at their correct location [see the signed receipt below], then being told in that same call to send them again with their official forms, and then waiting months for some kind of progress regarding the illegal GPS tracking device I received the letter below which tells that all was a waste of time, and money. This complete ignoring of a complaint by the IPT regarding Lancs. police’s clear breach the Data Protection Act [and European Convention of Human Rights Article 8, which concerns a citizen’s privacy, etc. – see below] surely shows the lawlessness rampant throughout the chronic and completely unacceptable and hostile targeting of Carol Woods by a police force – Lancs. police force – and their cronies in high places, including the Lancs. county council, Royal Mail and other household names who continue to break the law on an almost daily basis!! So, the IPT don’t want to know, with at least 3 letters from the Home Office telling me to go to the IPT, and the IPCC have already said they’ed be sending anything sent to them regarding Lancs. police back to Lancs. police, it all proves a complete and utter waste of time, and Lancs. police have carte blanche to break the laws exactly how they like with no one in the UK government calling them to account. Carol Woods is no “jihadi terrorist” or a member of any Mafia – she is a completely harmless old age pensioner who is a retired top social worker and Child Protection Officer  and Probation Officer and who spent her entire working career [for Lancs. county council, amongst others] in service to others – especially vulnerable children! Lancs. police’s [and others] problem is that Carol blew the whistle on rampant corruption  – see Carol’s original w’blowing 2006 blog post “York LGO Blog re Lancashire Co. Council” which explains why the abhorrent and complex targeting began – targeting that includes an infinite number of serious crimes enacted by officials, plus a] organised gangstalking by recruited neighbours she’s forced to endure daily [many of these recruited neighbours being unemployed thugs who are rewarded for their crimes out of the public purse – everything organised – it is alleged – by Lancs. police!], b] infinite DWP / Social Security frauds, c] infinite ID frauds using Carol’s credentials [Carol’s ID being got my R. Mail fraudulent deliveries of her mail to adjoining criminal neighbours who then use the ID gleaned for criminal purposes], and so much more she’s forced to experience daily – and has been forced to experience for years – ALL PAID FOR BY THE TAXPAYER – see  “Harassment as punishment for whistle-blowing: Lancashire” which details just some of her targeting.

Also – along with numerous MPs and government agencies [from the P.M. down] including the IPCC, the IPT, and Lancs. police themselves, the HMIC [Her Majesty’s Inspector of Constabularies] totally ignore recent communications sent to them too regarding this ongoing blatant and extremely serious lawbreaking by a police force acting as a crime cartel does  – resulting in complete and utter lawlessness!!!  [see “MESSAGE TO HMIC BOSS – 13 DEC. 2017 + archive  .

Below, the I.P.T. reject the notification to them regarding rampant lawbreaking by Lancs. police:

This is the R. Mail signed recorded delivery receipt  [signature deliberately distorted] connected to the original communication with 20 pages of notes  which, I was told, “didn’t arrive” at the IPT, although this signature surely shows the opposite. The repeat sending of the same notes were sent in exactly the same way, to the same postal address, and were received perfectly well but, as the letter above shows, all was a waste of time regarding the installation of the GPS tracking device in the car although it surely clearly breaches the most basic of Data Protection laws as well as Article 8 of the E.C.H.R. [see below]:

WHAT is happening to Carol Woods, with her constant surveillance by the authorities and gangstalking by recruited yobs, along with others must surely be a “specialist operation“ undertaken by Lancs. police. Is it not interesting that:

Chief Constable ​ [Merseyside police at present, formerly of Lancs. police]​

 Andy Cooke, QPM

​ ​


​   “In 2008 I left Merseyside after being appointed as Assistant Chief Constable at Lancashire Constabulary with responsibility for Specialist Operations” He thenleft Lancashire Constabulary to return to Merseyside after being appointed Assistant Chief Constable with responsibility for the Operations portfolio.In August 2013, I took up the post of Temporary Deputy Chief Constable and was appointed Deputy Chief Constable in September 2013. In the Queen’s Birthday Honours in 2014, I was awarded the Queen’s Police Medal.  I became Chief Constable in July 2016.” [from:  ​].

Specialist operations? What is happening to Carol Woods is surely a “Specialist Operation!
He also led the ACPO Witness Protection programme in 2015 when this radio programme was made – see @ 9mins 30secs into this video on certain failings of that operation.

Numerous communications have been sent to Mr. Cooke, and many others at Lancs. police regarding the deplorable targeting of Carol Woods, beginning in 2006 – everything has been ignored and stalled – see the recent update where Carol’s car was vandalised, but the local police refused to even acknowledge the  crime: 

The Carol Woods Coverup: Car vandalised – Lancs. police do nothing 19 Dec. 2017

and as for the forging of Carol’s signiature of official documents, and the other alterings of police records, Lancs. police refuse to even acknowledge communications!!


Another recent update – [see ARCHIVE of all 120+ posts since Feb. 2016 – ] 

Archive continues:


On 18 December 2017 at 19:02, carol woods <> wrote:

Dear Sirs,
I called into Lancaster University and as usual via the ILLEGAL GPS on my car which you all know about and do nothing about to assist me, the Gestapo arrange ANOTHER FRAUD and thug with trollop in “met with” farce INTENDED TO FORGERY and DEFRAUD ME. I attach here YET AGAIN the PROOF that the thugs in Lancashire have pretended for YEARS that I have met with lowlife when I have not. Not one person responded to the PROOF of FORGERY, FRAUD and worse.
Thus I leave the uni library and a local roughneck had been sent to stand about and “hide” outside but to walk as if “with me” when I left. (YOU FUND ALL THIS PROVIDING TAXIS ETC.) She had the PINK BAG which the Gestapo use in lunacy to pretend the user is me or my daughter. The reason is out of scope of this but the reason has been sent many times to show what lunatics I deal with. I took a photo of that troll. Also parked in a hiding position was the usual large car of thug, white which was then to speed off and PRETEND that I was with MY daughter and WE MET WITH THAT THUG as it was the 18th and they want to “revise” the 18 Sept 2008 FRAUD. I met with no one; all the plans to “see me off” by using lowlife round Fell View LA2 9RP having failed again to manufacture “proof I commit fraud, theft etc” they resort to “meeting with”. I met with no one and who paid that thug to drive all this way to park and pretend and, what was in it for the troll? Yours Carol Woods Ms I have heard from no one at all incidentally and have no phone whatever the deranged try to invent for me. Under duress at 28 Fell View LA2 9RP. Please feel free to quote me.
PS the daughter is one they threatened and intimidated for years as she was a great support for me. I have not seen her for 5 years now so the thugs leave her alone; MIKE TODD was murdered in all this leading to Sept 2008 and my daughter the lunatics dragged into it for a reason which will ALL be revealed. I will also add that via their ILLEGAL activity, they have spoiled the scanner I use in Lancaster university library; they want to stop me scanning here as they claim so many others are me who have no access to the uni and, they want to stop me scanning more of what Mike Todd had in front of him, what he was prosecuting on and why he was murdered. SOME of what he had in front of him was a bogus bankruptcy, perjury, EXTORTION, DEMAND MONEY WITH MENACES, WITNESS INTIMIDATION, ATTEMPTED MURDER PREMEDITATED, POLICE CORRUPTION AND CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER CHILD ABUSE ETC ETC. You can’t all be corrupt or cowardly; someone needs to assist me. Why would I want to meet with a thug and agree to pay money not owed?
I returned to the library after the troll had walked off and the thug had driven off. We will see if they want to repeat the exercise when I leave again.

SECTION OF A MESSAGE TO A [so called] TOP BARRISTER, 18 Dec. 2017: [there was no reply – so far. Interesting. This was the same barrister who told me this police force couldn’t be prosecuted. I replied that I thought “noone was above the law”? How foolish we general public are to think all men are equal under the law when its not like that at all].

“Regarding the errors which show themselves connected to this Act [regarding this device installed in Ms. Wood’s car], obvious discrepancies arise, do they not, when I quote the Act’s wording, and what is actually occurring in real time, for it is clearly stated within the Act that, regarding GPS devices and motor vehicles:

it is vital that organisations maintain a vehicle tracking policy that is fully transparent and compliant with the Data Protection Act. Under this Act, persons who have tracking devices installed in the vehicles they own have the right to know what information is being held about them and the purpose for which it will be used. For this reason, collecting data covertly is considered to be in breach of the law”.  

To summerise: if the actions of Lancs. police are “covert policing actions” as they have clearly stated in writing in a letter, then that action clearly contravenes the D.P. Act as the actions are not “fully transparent”, and have to be. By not telling any information, it is surely deemed “secretive”, or covert”, is it not?

The D.P. Act goes on to state:
“Furthermore, personal data can only be processed if at least one of the following applies:
1•The person concerned must have consented to the process
2•There is a contractual or legal obligation to process the data
3•It is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the subject”.

Taking the statement to pieces, we note that 

a] the words by the 1st dot:  “The person concerned must have consented to the process” [of having the device in her car] –  Ms. Woods did not consent to the process of her motor vehicle being tracked, which rules out the very 1st line shown above being followed properly, according to the Act, 


b] re: the 2nd line above, by the 2nd dot: “There is a contractual or legal obligation to process the data”– Ms. Woods has not been given any data pertaining to this device, “processed” or “unprocessed” and therefore the “legal obligation” by Lancs. police is broken, especially because the wording in the Act states: “Under this Act, persons who have tracking devices installed in the vehicles they own have the right to know what information is being held about them and the purpose for which it will be used”. Please note that Ms. Woods has been told nothing about anything re: the device, and the device has been in her car much longer than when she made the SAR [FOIA] request and paid the fee at the force’s Hutton HQ in Ja. 2017. Another clear irregularity where laws are broken.

Lancs. police have stated in writing that this device falls under “covert policing actions” and as such do not tell anything regarding this device – what it’s for, why it is there, or what information is gleaned by the device and what that info is used for – all these actions fall foul of the spirit of the Act and the Act itself – which surely makes the device totally not legal. 

Nothing to do with the device is “fully transparent” from Ms. Woods perspective, which it should be. 

Finally, the statement in the 3rd line and by the 3rd dot, referring presumably to 1] Ms. Woods being “the subject” = and the words: “It is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the subject”: Ms. Woods is not protected in any way by having this device in her car, and BE IT KNOWN THAT THE DIRECT OPPOSITE IT TRUE AS THERE HAVE BEEN DIFFERENT ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS UPON MS. WOODS BY STALKERS WHILST SHE HAS BEEN DRIVING HER CAR – THE EXACT OPPOSITE of a “protective” device, as clearly stated within the Act. 

Surely it is clear that Lancs. police’s “policy” fails entirely to be not only “a policy that is fully transparent and compliant with the Data Protection Act”, but that the Act has failed to be followed in so many areas.

PLUS this device ALSO breaches the E.C.H.R., Article 8 as already explained, that being the device breaches Ms. Woods privacy every time she enters her car.” [ends]


The Carol Woods Coverup: UPDATE: THE TRACKING DEVICE: LANCS. POLICE WRITE 17 Nov. 17 – 18 Dec. 17 + more

Despite at least 3 employees at the Home Office, and other government employees recommending in printed letters, including one from Mike Penning MP that I take any grievance regarding Lancs. police’s behaviour connected to Carol Woods to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal [IPT] I can now say that this outfit is doing nothing at all regarding my sending them 15 pages of notes and a wad of their forms regarding the illegal tracking device that was installed in Carol Wood’s car by Lancs. police. Likewise the IPCC has also refused to act on complaints concerning Lancs. police’s actions, and have stated in writing that anything sent will be referred to Lancs. police for conclusion! Not only that, a top barrister, whose name I won’t mention here, has also advised that the CPS will not prosecute a police force, no matter what. There we have it.  Also, the official F.O.I. Act [S.A.R.] fee was paid [and the receipt obtained] to Lancs. police at their Hutton, Preston HQ in January 2017 by Carol Woods for the proper and obligatory information relating to the GPS device in her car, THAT INFORMATION STILL BEING WITHELD BY LANCS. POLICE – another offence. See how the device entered Carol’s car here, below, entitled:  “Carol Woods statement of HOW THE TRACKING DEVICE CAME TO BE IN MS. CAROL WOODS MOTOR VEHICLE”.

Concerning the “Data Protection Act 1998”, it is clearly stated within it that:

it is vital that organisations maintain a vehicle tracking policy that is fully transparent and compliant with the Data Protection Act. Under this Act, persons who have tracking devices installed in the vehicles they own have the right to know what information is being held about them and the purpose for which it will be used. For this reason, collecting data covertly is considered to be in breach of the law.”  To summerise: if the actions of Lancs. police are “covert policing actions” as they have clearly stated in writing in a letter, then that action clearly contravenes the D.P. Act as the actions are not “fully transparent”, and have to be. 

The D.P. Act goes on to state:
“Furthermore, personal data can only be processed if at least one of the following applies:
•The person concerned must have consented to the process
•There is a contractual or legal obligation to process the data
•It is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the subject”.

PLEASE NOTE: a] Ms. Woods did not consent to the process of her motor vehicle being tracked, which rules out the very 1st line shown above, and re: the 2nd line above – Ms. Woods has not been given any data pertaining to this device, and therefore the “legal obligation” by Lancs. police is broken,


re: the 3rd line, Ms. Woods is not protected in any way by having this device in her car, and therefore this device is not justified in any way. ALSO, BE IT KNOWN THAT THERE HAVE BEEN ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS UPON MS. WOODS BY STALKERS WHILST SHE HAS BEEN DRIVING HER CAR – THE EXACT OPPOSITE of a “protective” device which is defined in line 3 above, according to the Act. All in all, this device breaches not on the Data Protection Act itself in many areas, but ALSO THE E.C.H.R., as already explained, that being the device breaches Ms. Woods privacy!

A] Ms. Woods has the right to know what information is being held about her and the purpose for which it will be used, but she has never been told anything regarding her motor vehicle being tracked.

Directly below, is the pointless and meaningless response received from Lancs. police, dated 17 November 2017.  I say meaningless because this response doesn’t actually address anything – but it does actually state the no investigation AT ALL has been undertaken regarding the complaint made about the GPS tracking device in Carol’s car, only a response at “local resolution” level – a pointless exercise meaning, more than likely, that an extremely informal chat took place between certain “officers” over a cup of tea during a “tea break” in the police station canteen to resolve the extremely serious and longstanding complaint regarding the horrific and blatant targeting of a vulnerable, single, lawabiding old age pensioner who gave her entire life in service to others – particularly vulnerable and lone CHILDREN. Trying to get the right and proper conclusion to the abject and preplanned flouting of the law by these characters has taken so far 9 months, since March 2017, when my original communication [below]  was sent to the then Chief Constable Finnegan, who then left his post and moved on! The latest interaction is hardly worth reporting, despite the misleading title of the team that has been sadly been corresponding for a minimum amount of time compared to the original date of beginning this complaint  – MARCH 2017 – 9 MONTHS AGO. All that’s happened is that nothing to do with any investigation or conclusion to anything has taken place, or even been remotely near, yet pointless paperwork like the below was sent, to presumably, keep me quiet, in,line, shut up and satisfied.  I don’t think so.   Despite this contemptuous timewasting and subsequent squandering of our tax money [which funds the pointless nonsense of illegal tracking devices in totally lawabiding citizen’s cars also] LANCS. POLICE ARE STILL GUILTY OF BREACHING NOT ONLY ARTICLE 8 OF THE E.C.H.R. BUT ALSO THE DATA PROTECTION ACT by not saying anything about it to the innocent recipient of the GPS device which it is their duty to do, and are guilty of probably A WHOLE LOT MORE regarding everything that we aren’t even aware of, such as “unjustifable police actions” and the “rampant squandering of public funds” etc. etc..

Note in the very 1st line of the letter below it states that a “local resolution” has been enacted by Lancs. police instead of the more proper and surely more appropriate “formal investigation” that should have taken place – a dead giveaway that little actual honesty at all is taking place here as opposed to the correct method of dealing with an illegal act and breach of the European Convention on Human Right’s Article 8, which states: 

1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.”

See more regarding the “Data Protection Act” below in my original message to Lancs. police Chief Constable Finnegan, letter dated 31 March 2017, also contemptuously ignored on each sending [I’ve lost count how many letters of complaint have been sent to Lancs. police by myself alone regarding this tracking device, installed in the car of a person who has, probably, never broken a law in her life, and what’s more has more formal qualifications than the entire congregation of “police officers” that make up the entire Lancs, police HQ at Hutton, Preston, including the chief and deputy chief constables – and all the rest!]. Please use copious amounts of “discernment” regarding the latest extremely disappointing use of resources, and citizen’s taxes:


What kind of police force is  this that can persecute a lawabiding pensioner so badly for so long [since 2006]? For Lancs. police are responsible for a great deal of extremely questionable behaviour – for which there is OVERWHELMING and UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE.

The subject of pursuing justice regarding the despicable actions of LANCS. POLICE will be continue until JUSTICE IS DONE!!

See related: 



made during the 3 day visit – see more:  “…the Visit”:  The Shocking Carol Woods Coverup: VISIT / Lancs: Compromise agreement falsified, + archive 10 July 17


— Received from Ms. Carol Woods on 17 OCTOBER 2017:


16 / 10 / 2017

“hi, just got the mail – completely crazy at my return [Ms. Woods had been away on holiday…JG.] – preface my car was not at an airport car park – apparently I am the owner of a silver grey Yaris much newer than mine – I seem to be an Asian female with long, dark hair.
Preface Fell View is now 298 Oxcliffe Rd thus I have just bought my car AND AM NOT THE VICTIM FROM 2012.

I looked on Northern Car Sales site, Shaw Rd. Oldham January 2012 when staying with my sister – I only went onto the yard to get rid of a thug following me – he just used his phone presumably to say I looked at cars. I decided a car for sale was affordable and having a car would solve massive problems. I went back the next day and felt sure they expected me. Another car had appeared – the red Yaris and I was diverted to that. I had a test drive, liked it, agreed to buy it – cash. But the car price was £40 short of [my sister owed me money so I knew I’d get it] – the garage was responsible for completing the tear off strip for DVLA doc. change of owner / address of registered person. All that done, I had to go and get insurance before removing the car – I knew I’d have been arrested for driving without insurance if I drove it just to my sister’s. The insurance matter was awful – I’ve had other cars and never experienced the antics but – all done the garage told me not to collect the car until 5pm on 21/1/12 – why? Surely they just wanted it off the yard as sold?
I went at 3pm to see what they were up to. My ignition was in bits – I was told they had snapped my key in the lock so needed to replace the system to accomodate a new key. I told them I was not daft – I thought of my white Polo – I told them what I thought they were doing – I was right, they had been 
contacted and told if they wanted to stay in business, they’ed do as told. Gestapo? Yes. Then he said “You’re dealing with lunatics” – I said, “I know”. I went to sit in the office – the DVLA slip I could see – the man in the office assured me he would send it on – I was using my sister;s address to register the car. He told me not to bother about the £40 which I’d said I’d drop in with on 22 Jan.
Getting the car about 5, I asked why there was no new key – he’d broken the original, old key, hadn’t he? I also asked why they had not used the spare key and just had a 2nd as spare cut – they knew I knew exactly what had gone on. Oddly, the man said “They can’t keep on arresting you” – “of course they can – who’ll stop them?” I said – a bit more chat – I said I’d be in the next morning with £40, was told not to bother but I wasn’t falling for that. It was a trap.
Parking at my sister’s then showing her the car – I saw 900 miles had been added to the clock from my agreeing to buy it. [I faxed the Home Saecretary and K Clarke at least 3 times each to get that on record – where the hell had I apparently been to use 900 miles?].
The next morning I went with the £40 – they were not open – or pretended – the £40 trap was set. I took a note of the 2 x £20 notes, scribbled a note, put in an envelope and took photos of it going imnto the letterbox. I owed them nothing.
On the 23rd Jan. I drove to Lancaster and transferred my insurance to my company – one I’d used for over 20 years – they were really good and getting all the refund due to me, showed illegal accessing of the company systems.
The Gestapo pulled me up after I left my insurance company [each event has it’s own story] – just to harass – to be seen to be a liar – then I returned to my sister’s. I left her house and stayed in a guest house for 4 days – called into the garage and they had NOT sent the DVLA doc. on. I asked for it and dealt with it myself. They had no intention of sending it in. For days then weeks then months [I started to rent at 298 on 4/3/12 after driving to Lewes to deal with outstanding matters from 2011 and living in my car most of Feb.] attempts were made to stealing my car key so I would then have to force my locks to get in and have new locks – their problem was they could not claim I had stolen the car, that I drove without insurance, and that I knew of the GPS – and how I could prove they had not broken the key at all to have a new ignition system fitted.
With amazing luck, my car key was stolen but I had the spare key in my bag so didn’t need to force the locks – had another spare cut and so it went on.
Followed into the ladies in students union offices which are not open to all and sundry – at the Uni – washing my hands – my keys placed by the sink disappeared – reported – ignored. I knew it had to be 1 of 2 trolls – again, I’d had my spare in my bag and always keep a spare. 2 garages have looked [April ’16 and May ’16] to see if they can remove it but said “too sophisticated” and will disable the car if they try to remove it.”

N.B.: Everything to do with this illegal GPS tracking device, including everything above was sent as a complaint to Lancs. police, and their “Investigations Team”s response was – nothing, and thus everything was then forwarded to the Investigations Powers Tribunal [IPT] after filling in all their forms, and sending 15 pages or so of documents pertaining to the device and related items, including Lancs. police’s so-called “responses” – the IPT’s response has also been – nothing. The woman I spoke to weeks ago at the IPT when chasing up my sending of the  IPT forms and related docs. notifying the IPT about this GPS device even told me the IPT tribunal would probably dismiss my contacting them regarding this matter of this illegal GPS device, or deem everything inadmissable – and this was the receptionist on the phone one gets when initially calling in to the!  To date, 12 Dec. 17, I am still waiting to hear from the IPT regarding anything to do with the 15 pages of notes and forms sent to them – completely unaccptable! 


Regarding the illegal “tracking device” installed in Carol Wood’s motor vehicle, and despite CW’s asking for obligatory information from Lancs. police regarding this device after her paying the proper “Freedom of Information” request fee at Lancs. police Hutton HQ in January 2017 was totally ignored, Lancs. police wanted a letter of permission, finally, from CW so I could interact with Lancs. police on her behalf so my complaint regarding this “tracking device” being installed in Carol Woods motor vehicle [and other matters] could be taken seriously.

One original contact with Lancs. police was in March 2017 [below] to the chief constable Finnegan, who promptly moved on from his postition – my communication completely ignored, as was every other communication sent until I contacted 3 chief constables a couple of months later regarding not being able to report serious crime to the police, which was also ignored by all sent to, so then I had no choice but to begin complaining about that. The “Investigations Support Team” of Lancs. police answered finally, [below] requiring a “letter of permission” from Carol Woods so as I could interact on her behalf regarding matters, also below. Now, after that “letter of permission” was finally received in writing from CW, and sent to Lancs. police, still nothing is done by Lancs. police Professional Standards and “Investigations Team” about this “tracking device”!

Typical recent  communication from the Lancs. police “Professional Standards” dept. regarding my complaint to them regarding the device in Carol’s car, which breaches not only the E.C.H.R. but also the Data Protection Act:


The “letter of permission” from Carol Woods, dated 24 August 17, asked for by and sent 25 Aug. 17 to Lancs. police by recorded delivery 1st class Royal Mail, partly acknowledged now by Lancs. police:

Below, the original [ignored] communication from 31 March 2017 to the then Lancs. police chief constable Finnegan regarding the illegal GPS tracking device in Carol’s car. All other communications regarding this subject and reporting serious crime are ignored by all police contacted – including my local police, and 3 chief constables, until finally 2 local officers visited myself unexpectedly [after I had written so many times to the Dorset CC trying to make contact with police] on Saturday 9 June 17 at 9pm   claiming – after my explaining as best I could the utter chaos Carol is forced to suffer courtesy of the authorities in Lancs., – that they would report matters concerning Carol Woods to Lancs. police, and Carol would be contacted by Lancs. police forthwith. Of course no such contact has been made by Lancs. police to Carol as promised – the daily persecution continues unabated, though.

“From:  Mr. J. Graham, [redacted]

To:  Mr.  S. Finnegan,  Chief Constable of Lancashire Police,
Lancashire Constabulary Headquarters,
Saunders Lane,
Hutton nr Preston,
PR4 5SB.

31 March 2017

Dear Mr. Finnegan,

I am writing to you concening the tracking device installed in the motor vehicle used by Ms. CAROL WOODS.

Ms Carol Woods address is:  28 Fell View, Caton, Lancashire, LA2 9RP.

I’m sure you are aware that regarding Ms. Woods motor vehicle, not only does such a device installed in her vehicle contavene 1] the Data Protection Act 1998, but also contravenes Ms. Woods rights according to 2] the European Commission of Human Rights [E.C.H.R.] – please see below:

1] The Data Protection Act 1998:

“The UK vehicle tracker laws fall under the category of processing personal data and accordingly, it is governed by the Data Protection Act 1988. In order to ensure vehicle tracking legality, it is vital that organisations maintain a vehicle tracking policy that is fully transparent and compliant with the Data Protection Act. Under this Act, persons who have tracking devices installed in the vehicles they own have the right to know what information is being held about them and the purpose for which it will be used. For this reason, collecting data covertly is considered to be in breach of the law.
Furthermore, personal data can only be processed if at least one of the following applies:
•The person concerned must have consented to the process
•There is a contractual or legal obligation to process the data
•It is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the subject”.

PLEASE NOTE: a] Ms. Woods did not consent to the process of her motor vehicle being tracked, and

b] Ms. Woods has the right to know what information is being held about her and the purpose for which it will be used, but she has never been told anything regarding her motor vehicle being tracked.


2] The European Court of Human Rights “Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides a right to respect for one’s “private and family life, his home and his correspondence”

1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.”

PLEASE NOTE:  referring to the European Court of Human Rights, Article 8:
Ms. Woods right to privacy has clearly been breached by the interference of this tracking device installed in her motor vehicle.

Mr. Finnegan, it is clear that such a tracking device installed in Ms. Woods motor vehicle is in clear breach of these 2 statutes cited above, and in the respect of trying to obtain information regarding this tracking device, Ms. Woods states:
 “I have asked specifically for the data in relation to PERMISSION for GPS sought and then gained, and paid £10

but received nothing. I TOOK my £10 in Jan 2017 after asking if I needed to pay £10 via Jan this year, it was acknowledged as received as I drove all the way to HUTTON HQ, to deliver it (I asked them to formally acknowledge receipt) as well as getting a receipt there at the front desk”. Therefore Ms. Woods has applied for the information regarding the tracking device in her vehicle, but not received any information in return – an extremely serious irregularity. Can you please remove this device from Ms. Woods motor vehicle that is clearly falling foul of the statutes in place – those being the Data Protection Act 1998  and the Article 8 of the European Commission of Human Rights?

Mr. Finnegan, failure to acknowledge this communication will result in my contacting the highest authorities regarding these breaches of the said statutes stated above.

Thank you.

J. Graham  concerned citizen” [ENDS]

After much stalling by the Lancs. police to even admit there was a tracking device in Ms. Woods car this letter below was finally received on the 27 September 17 from Lancs, police “Investigations Team” with the admission that a tracking device was being used in Carol’s car and was being used under “covert policing tactics“, which is quite a remarkable example of bs considering known jihadi terrorists in the UK surely are not stalked  as severely, nor are organised criminal gang members. Carol is neither of those, and it is painfully obvious that the only reason the device is being used at all is to blatantly harass and gangstalk Carol every time she goes out and drives her car.  Indeed, attempts to murder Carol have taken place when she has been driving her car, when the unemployed stalking yobs who harass Carol all the time anyway have tried a few times to manufacture road traffic accidents where Carol would be the injured – or deceased – party. I myself witnessed – as a passenger in Carol’s car when I visited earlier this year – these stalking yobs driving their car perilously close to Carol’s completely unneccessarily, and performing outrageous manoevres with the passengers in the offending car looking back, once passed, laughing hysterically at their perverse actions. Again, Lancs. police have much to answer for by paying these thugs to perform such cr-p, deliberately endangering lives in the process.

“COVERT POLICING TACTICS” ARE CITED IN THE LETTER BELOW FROM LANCS. POLICE AS THE REASON this GPS device has been installed in Carol’s car – BUT WHY? Carol is no “JIHADI TERRORIST”, nor a member of any ORGANISED CRIME CARTEL, or anything to do with anything CRIMINAL, yet Lancs. police have installed this GPS tracking device in her car and WON’T TELL HER WHY!!  WHYEVER NOT??  Not only does this GPS device breach Carol’s HUMAN RIGHTS [Article 8 of the E.C.H.R.] but by not telling Carol why the device is there in the first place but the device, and not stating why it is there in the 1si place also breaches Carol’s rights under the DATA PROTECTION ACT. She has paid the correct fee at the Lancs. police Hutton HQ in January 2017 via a FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST [S.A.R.] that is the normal procedure to get the information but still Lancs. police refuse to forward any to her – ANOTHER CRIME!!27 sept covert lREDACT ancs inv20171016_00142207


Also, before contacting the IPT, a complaint was made to the IPCC  regarding not being able to report serious crimes, which included the

a] installation of the “tracking device” in CW’s vehicle,

b] Dorset Police hanging up in me when being contacted by them regarding reporting serious crimes pertaining to Carol Woods to any police,


c] Lancs. police ignoring communications to them over the months, and not responding after the 2 Dorset officers who visited myself on 9 June 17 claiming they would be contacting Lancs. police who would then be contacting Carol Woods [no such contact was made, naturally]. Below is my complaint to the IPCC and their response – which was to pass everything back to Lancs. police, who were stonewalling in the first place and responsible for the numerous irregularities anyway!!!, [and still are]:

26 June 2017 at 22:45
Dear Ms. Coulton,
Here, below, is my latest communication to yourself in reply to your message to me, dated 22 June 17.
 I DO wish to report as stated to the I.P.C.C. the matters described.
Thank you.
J. Graham  concerned citzen
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: !enquiries <>
Date: 22 June 2017 at 12:32
Subject: IPCC Reference – xxxxxxx

To: “” <>

Dear Mr Graham

Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). We acknowledge receipt of your email dated 13 June 2017, the contents of which have been filed under the above reference number.

I note from your email that you are unhappy with the police, however it is not clear if you are wishing to submit a formal complaint against the police.

If you wish to make a new complaint or allegation of misconduct against a serving member of the police then the IPCC can forward it on your behalf to the relevant police force. If you do wish to make such a complaint or allegation we will need to be provided with the following information;

WHO? Which police force is your complaint about?

WHERE? Where did the incident/s happen that led to your complaint?

WHEN? When did the incident/s happen that led to your complaint?

WHAT? Please describe the circumstances that have led to you feeling the police have treated you badly.

If however you do not wish to make a new complaint or allegation of misconduct, or submit an appeal against a concluded investigation into a previous complaint I do not believe the IPCC can assist you any further at this time.

Please note that all complaints made to the IPCC by law must be forwarded to the ‘appropriate authority’ for consideration – usually this is the Professional Standards Department (PSD) of the police force concerned. When you submit your complaint in full your details will be passed onto the PSD for consideration.

Yours sincerely

Customer Contact Advisor Independent Police Complaints Commission

(IPCC)———- Forwarded message ———-
From: butlincat <>
Date: 23 June 2017 at 11:14
Subject: IPCC Reference – 2017/087595


I do wish to raise a complaint against Lancs police

​ – specifically Mr. ​S. ​Finnegan C​hief Constable as he refuses to answer numerous messages to him,
​specifically the one shown below dated 31 March 17, and against also their Professional Standards, who are mentioned in the attached  response ​[letter] from Lancs police – they still have not contacted me as promised.
J. Graham

The above communication was replied to in full by the IPCC – the end result simply stating that everything was passed back to Lancs. police by the IPCC – hence the Lancs Police “Investigations Team” finally responding via their “covert police tactics” letter on the 27 September 2017. The next stage was complaining to the IPT, which was done, but has got nowhere as I write on 12 Dec. 17. – the entire process beginning in March 2017 with the letter to the ex-CC Finnegan.

Meanwhile, the Home Office wrote to send everything regarding this “tracking device” to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal [as already detailed above] – the letter dated 31 August 17, something that Carol did already some time ago – her comment: 

Date: 5 September 2017 at 15:46
Subject: Re: Fwd: Win cw

Hi thanks for this; firstly, I have 3 huge files from the Gestapo from 2002 when they claimed to the IPT that they had never heard of me and that I had never lived in Lancaster. That led to all sorts which included the IPT ceasing the FULL INQUIRY into my case after NATIONAL news bulletin April 2006, “The government has ordered an inquiry into how Lancashire conducts its affairs”. The Gestapo spoiled all that: the IPT just returned my file to me with no comments. It was March 2008 JUST THE WEEK MIKE TODD WAS MURDERED when the IPT told me in a letter that they thought Carol Woods was an alias and that I was really someone else somewhere else, my sister in fact.” [ENDS]

The above are just part of numerous communications to and from UK government departments regarding the appalling and illegal targeting of Carol Woods by certain UK government personnel paid by the taxpayer to act in a responsible and honest manner, which include, especially, the police – local to Ms. Woods and the main force, and the county council, and all connected, including Royal Mail, who refuse to do anything regarding Carol’s mail being deliberately diverted and misdelivered, or delivered to her months later – or not delivered at all.

to be continued, when any progress is made with these dubious government departments!


The Shocking Carol Woods Coverup: SHOCKINGLY, LANCS. POLICE ALTER RECORDS YET AGAIN! + Lancs court corruption ; party to M Todd R.I.P. + The False Arrests / P.C. Massingham’s Perjury 31 Oct. 2017 + archive


The “Bug Detector” in use: video:


RELATED [from earlier]:

The Shocking Carol Woods Coverup: Lancs. police still refuse to acknowledge the illegal “vehicular tracking device” and other serious crimes against Carol Woods 11 Sept. 17 + archive


The Carol Woods Coverup: Car vandalised – Lancs. police do nothing 19 Dec. 2017

On Tuesday, 19 December 2017, 20:52, carol woods  wrote:

“Just to let you know I returned to my car after an early cinema show (8 15pm) and found my car window smashed among all the cars parked on the street and only mine any damage. Some people passing loaned me their phone so I rang he Gestapo and a cop came, motor bike and took the details of a car parked illegally at a bus stop near by; he did not bother about my car. Dec 2005 and Daisy Mae Morrison’s car was vandalised outside my house, we had gone into Lancaster. That was WITNESS INTIMIDATION and in Jan 2006 when she called again and her car was written off, I had my court case then stayed to protect my witnesses. In Dec 2008 they stole my car K71 CEC and installed a GPS, I found out and they stole my car taking it to the police garage MACADAMS where they systematically wrecked it to hide the GPS installed then illegally. The Gestapo have stalked all day trying to pretend they see me driven by another. I can drive my car back to Hell View and cover up the windows. They started on my car over a week ago. Carol (so someone knows) the street is terraced houses and someone must have heard it all.

To Lancs but CC to others who will get the gist, I require the name rank and badge number of the Gestapo driving AGAIN this time to confirm he saw me and a RED MINI and not the yellow one of the earlier farce. The yellow MINI details I sent via email; the red was HD59 NUK and does not rewrite the Aug 2015 and helicopter farce using the RED MINI then to pretend A Jackson of 26 Fell View was me.
I also note that YOU arranged for my car windows to be smashed to be Daisy Mae’s car at my house Dec 2005 and then Jan 2006 in WITNESS INTIMIDATION with the thugs then following me to a corner shop to threaten and intimidate me. The dreary old loser stalking me after the library about 5 45pm reminded me of those thugs that night Jan 2006.FOR THOSE CC THIS I HAD MY THEN COURT APPEAL STAYED TO PROTECT MY WITNESSES. DAISY MAE IS BLACK SO IT WAS AGGRAVATED BY RACISM AND HER CAR WAS WRITTEN OFF IN JAN 06 AS MINE WAS IN THE REPEAT OF JAN 2009 AFTER MY HOUSE HAD BEEN WRECKED OF COURSE WITH THE WINDOWS THERE RIPPED OUT IN THAT WRECKING OF MY HOUSE IN OCT 08 PRIOR TO MY CAR.
MY car K71 CEC was stolen with an illegal GPS device fitted in Dec 2008 and then stolen in Jan 2009 and written off BY YOUR GARAGE MACADAMS of Carnforth to hide the illegal GPS then.
I note that the Gestapo biker called after some people were kind enough to help me at my car and reported the TARGETED VANDALISM via their phone. The Gestapo was not calling about my reported car but to note a car illegally parked on a bus stop. EJ61 NPF and if you think that makes me forget the GMP thugs at my brother’s house parked then at a bus stop in Nov 2004 to threaten and intimidate you can think again, bullying thugs. This to GMP thugs and so they know my photos of that night are excellent and WILL BE SEEN.
You are a disgrace. Carol Woods Ms PS the officer taking my car report was decent. I WAIT TO TESTIFY. [ends]


Some Background to the targeting of Carol Woods:

Carol Woods = “It is a highly complex matter which the police organise where they try to make me someone I am not. They have in fact tried to invent me as the reverse of myself using numerous characters, including “neighbours” who live alongside myself, and others elsewhere – the entire situations going back years. I find things out because I am not stupid. See my original w’blowing blog York LGO Blog re Lancashire CC you will see why I am hounded by lowlife RECRUITED to do that by the Gestapo.

More is described here:   “Harassment as punishment for whistle-blowing: Lancashire”

Apart from numerous and longstanding ID frauds [where goods and other services have been obtained by dubious “neighbours” in her locale using Carol Wood’s ID, much obtained via her stolen mail – something Royal Mail has been notified about an infinite amount of times, with no proper response at all] and along with many other serious crimes enacted in her name [see the list below in the section entitled “Some Background, below] Carol Woods is stalked daily by her neighbours who are, it is very strongly alleged, employed by the local police and other factions of Lancs. county council. Ms. Woods is particularly targeted at the library which she has to use for the use of the computers therein, as having computers and phones etc. at her home has proven futile because of them being hacked by the same individuals who hack the library computers whenever she uses them. These unemployed, mostly male yobs, in the pay of the police etc. to surveille Ms. Woods [it is very strongly alleged], openly sit alongside her in the library, mobile phones in their hands while they hack the computer Ms. Woods is using, scanning and interfering with whichever emails to and from Ms. Woods they see fit, amongst other electronic interference.

What is particularly appalling also is that – apart from the Royal Mail letters being deliberately misdelivered to criminal neighbours etc. – so many serious crimes committed against Ms. Woods have been refused being reported for years now, to the police and other government agencies, including the IPCC who do nothing when told about complaints involving Lancs. police. Apart from Ms. Woods continually contacting police departments and politicians and other government agencies, other supporters have contacted UK Government departments regarding the serious crimes Ms. Woods is victim of, I personally have approached 3 different chief constables of 3 different police forces to no avail, and the IPCC have been complained to regarding this lack of duty by police employees – the IPCC merely passing my concerns back to the force allegedly behind the bulk of so many of the very strongly alleged crimes – Lancs. police. Contacting these UK Government departments has proven a complete waste of time, such is the coverup involved to do with so much of what is very strongly alleged concerning Ms. Carol Woods.

The posts and updates from Ms. Woods on this site alone detail this harassment from Ms. Woods neighbours along with detailing many of the numerous crimes committed since Febuary 2016 when Ms. Woods was forcibly detained for no reason other than to silence her in a mental unit, for the 5th time. As there were no proper grounds for Ms. Woods to be held in the mental unit, she was released after protests were made. This enforced kidnapping of Ms. Woods was the 5th time such a kidnapping had occurred to Ms. Woods because of the input by certain authorities who completely shirk their responsibilities and cover up serious crime – eg. employing and paying from the public purse criminals who flout the law by  stalking Ms. Woods almost daily, and every time Ms. Woods leaves her abode, and also enabling them to partake in numerous ID frauds completely outside of the law, and much more – the reporting of numerous DWP benefit frauds and connected to the DWP fraud department, and to the banks – Barclays and Santander – who had numerous accounts in false names to launder the DWP monies gained illegally, proving a complete waste of time also.

Some more background:

In the latest posts and in the archive linked, Carol  goes into greater detail regarding what she is having to experience from those around her, all with, it seems, the full cooperation and assistance of the local authorities who command the numerous crimes and the actions of the numerous lowlife stalkers she is surrounded by.  Not only do these nightmare neighbours she is surrounded by steal her landline telephone and internet delivery lines running into her house, and misuse it on an almost daily basis by the lines being previously diverted to their more than likely ramshackle homes, they also steal her electricity too when they can [when Carol switches it on], and much more. Carol can hear her neighbours testing their electricity sockets after she has turned her power on from the main switch in her home. For this very reason her electricity supply is having to be almost permanently switched off for fear of it being hacked by these criminal neighbours, she lives by candlelight and she has had to live electricity free in her home for years because of these lowlives’ thieving alongside her home – many of them doting and ageing pensioners who steal her services because they can and do not get criminally charged with anything – courtesy of the fake authoritarian figures in place who should be in prison rather than be sitting pretty in a government office somewhere, local or otherwise. Fake IDs used by so many – if not all – of Carol’s criminal neighbours pay for many things through fake bank accounts, the money all ultimately coming from the UK taxpayer – the general public, as are the new cars given as rewards to certain neighbours paid for the same way – the road tax etc for these cars also paid for by the UK public, as are the numerous “Blue Badge” schemes many of these cars are concessioned with – all registered via false details but paid for out of the public purse. Authorities do nothing when told about these scams – how much longer can these outright crimes continue?

Regarding the internet and phone lines running into her abode: Carol even witnessed the rewiring of such to cater for her neighbours criminal thieving when she came back home from being out one day – the lines being rearranged and diverted into her loft where the neighbour’s connections take place, and thus the ability for these thieves to steal her services. A bit of  detail about this stealing of Carol’s services – when Carol came back from being out one day, she noticed an ironing board, of all things, leaning against a wall in one of her rooms which wasn’t there before she’d gone out. On moving the ironing board, there on the wall was – crudely written in biro or whatever – the electrician or whoever’s drawing for the rewiring of the phone + internet lines being diverted into her loft – for the use of the thieving neighbours as already described. This is why, when out on later outings to wherever, tell-tale ironing boards would be left deliberately en route – leaning against walls or whatever – for Carol not to miss. Such is the cruelty of the minds involved in this entire gangstalking scenario CW is having and has had to put up with for so many years. Does any authority  do anything about any of this stealing of her phone or internet services when they’re notified? No they don’t – the same way as the CEO of Royal Mail ignores all notifications to him regarding misdeliveries of CW’s mail to assorted neighbours [see earlier posts on this]. Other authorities also contemptuously ignore other notifications of gross irregularities / crimes sent to them. Why? Go figure. Semantic battles with the R. Mail’s current CEO proved pointless when trying to report the numerous and longstanding deliberate misdeliveries of mail to the neighbours who give CW such a hard time. As for these loutish neighbours and their hostilities, it’s hard to argue, for example, when someone wearing a police officer’s uniform making out they’re a police officer is intimidating one and breathing down one’s neck giving one preposterous orders to harass and hurt a fellow citizen – but harass and hurt they do, putting aside any semblance of conscience or, dare I say it – guilt. Perhaps the gift of a new car – or two – paid for by the UK taxpayers – eases their conscience and helps these sad characters turn the other cheek and commit serious crime and also stalk so inhumanly someone who devoted her entire working life in service to others – as Carol has – trying to help children especially. These lowlives – and the lowlives controlling all the conspiracies against Carol Woods – have much to answer for, and let’s hope that day comes soon when they get their comeuppance – noone likes a corrupt traitor, especially those who are in the positions they’re in, whose sky-high wages are paid by the UK taxpayer, and its funny how things turn around and come back ten times worse for those perpetrating these obscenities. But that’s noone’s problem but theirs.

It is completely unjust and as outrageous and unfair that I am refused reporting – by 3 separate police forces – serious crimes, as correspondence, or rather ignored correspondences to these 3 police forces, would show [UPDATE 24 JUNE 17 – a few days ago – at 20.53BST on the evening of Saturday 17 June, to be exact, 2 Dorset officers knocked on my door without any forewarning [after my now numerous messages to the Chief Constable]and although unprepared, I duly gave them such info as I could regarding the huge number of crimes listed so far as detailed by and committed against CW. After 50 minutes, one of the officers promised me that “Lancs. police would be got in touch with, with a view for them to contact CW”. Of course I immediately protested that, allegedly, the Lancs. police were one of the very parties behind this series of numerous ongoing crimes, and to do such would be a waste of time. Note that this has been tried before when Lancs. police have been told of certain crimes pertaining to CW by CW, and nothing has been done at all. Nevertheless, this was all I could expect, apparently. Who knows if anything was passed on to Lancs. police, and even if it was, will anything be done about anything? It is now weeks since Dorset police were informed that night of 17 June, and Ms. Woods harassment continues unabated – so the evidence points to the fact that nothing has been done regarding what was reported to those 2 Dorset police officers]. If one complains to higher authorities about this completely unacceptable situation, I would guess that the targeting I am experiencing almost on a daily basis – whenever I go out – would escalate to an unacceptable level, causing me to fear for my very own life. That is why also the updates from CW have been drastically curtailed here. So be it. William Burroughs, the great author, once said that if a person didn’t want to catch malaria, one shouldn’t go to an area where malaria is rife. I seemed to have stumbled into something similar. So be that also…

The question has been asked: “why would the “Powers That Be” target someone such as Carol Woods for so long [since 2006], involving so many perpetrators, committing so many serious crimes, funded by the public and local council taxpayers?”.

Carol Woods is a 63 years old former Lancashire County Council Level 3 Social Worker and Child Protection Officer [who used to train social workers] and a former Probation Officer, amongst many other things. Perhaps the appalling and chronic targeting she has no choice but to put up with 24/7 is because she reported numerous seriously grave irregularities she discovered, including child abuse, when being employed by Lancashire county council, and when one realises that the very controllers of the targeting and stalking Carol is forced to endure are, very probably, very closely connected to the same departments and personnel who are described in the links above and the “IMPORTANT VIDEOS” shown below, which detail what was discovered when Carol worked as a Child Protection officer in Lancashire, then it should not be hard to understand these hostilities enacted against her. Put it this way: the Welsh scientist, weapons expert and authority on biological warfare, employed by the British Ministry of Defence David Kelly was supposed to have leaked serious information to the detriment of the PTB at the time – look what happened to him. Now, Carol is no weapons expert, but one doesn’t have to be one to upset the proverbial apple cart bigtime. And anyway, we are told there have been assassination attempts upon her life too – quite a few in fact, including ramming her car at speed, on a main road, by perpetrators unknown…well, almost unknown.

And why is there an illegal tracking device installed in Ms. Woods car – put there, apparently – by Lancs. police? The Chief Constable of Lancashire has been written to so many times about so many serious matters with no response it’s quite remarkable. Another 2 chief constables have been written to asking can serious crime be reported to their forces also with no response whatsoever, and I have tried on more than one occasion to notify my local police about serious crime at my local central police station to be totally ignored every visit, which is just another public scandal!

Many more serious crimes and misdemeanours committed against Ms. Woods are all completely ignored by whichever UK government agency one tries to take anything to, including:


many murder attempts upon Carol,

impersonation, ID frauds,

person[s] impersonating police officers in official government hearings, [or hearing[s]  purporting to be official],

Royal Mail frauds,

monetary frauds involving: dubious bank accounts at numerous high street banks, the DWP, Social Security, town council[s] and other agencies,

illegal tracking of motor vehicle via GPS device [or similar],

a high number of motor vehicle “Blue Badge” [UK HM Government concession] frauds,

regular physical harassment / mental torture upon a person [aka “gangstalking”],

telephone / Internet Broadband  / electricity supply fraud,

wrongful arrest,

wrongful kidnapping[s] / incarceration[s] in UK HM Government units, police station[s], HM Prison[s] etc.,

home burglaries, car vandalism going uninvestigated by local police [see 

– many other instances of serious crime and illegal activity exist, and many acts contravening not only the Data Protection Act 1998, but also the contravention of articles pertaining to the European Commission of Human Rights [particularly Article 8].

What is going on is maybe unbelievable, and at times complicated, but that is surely deliberate and part of this outrageous targeting of a law-abiding citizen  – a lone female – who dared to report serious irregularities she found during her employment as a Level 3 social worker and Child Protection Officer. As a result, apart from the crimes committed against her as described, her house and contents with a value of £400,000+ was stolen from her, and her employment tribunal award of £50,000 found its way to someone who conspired against her who fraudulently took Carol Wood’s ID. Other serious crimes exist and continue to  this very day…


 1] PLAYLIST [3 videos]: EXPOSING FAKE SOCIAL WORKERS ETC. 06 Febuary 2016

2] Please listen to this vital radio show interview with Ms. Woods from the 12 March 2016

3] CAROL WOODS WHISTLEBLOWER ON RADIO lancashire police corruption county council 06 Febuary 2016


 SriLankerC 24 April 2016

5] Interview by torquaytalkeytv  31 March 16

6] Carol Woods Social Worker Unlawfully Incarcerated In Psychiatric Gulag   – 16 April 2016 by  GeorgeGreekTrucker


See all 120+ posts from Carol Woods since Feb. 2016 –


FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use. 
 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:

NB: DISCLAIMER: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.

About butlincat

my butlincats blog: [2 a/cs : pink cat logo is main a/c, winking cat logo is secondary] linkedin -
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.