Maurice Kirk 2nd call 13 July 2018
1st call 13 July 2018
Leg slammed in door – possible broken leg which is denied medical treatment – from https://wordpress.com/post/butlincat.com/21584
Archive: Maurice is serving a highly questionable 2 year sentence, beginning on 14/12/2017 in HMP Parc, Bridgend, Wales – the archive of posts here: https://butlincat.com/?s=maurice+kirk
Maurice’s site is http://www.mauricejohnkirk.com
his email address is: firstname.lastname@example.org
From MK’s 2nd facebook a/c = https://www.facebook.com/mauricejohnkirkflyingvet
“Sample of documents indicating an over-arching view of a malicious conspiracy
1. Crown Prosecution, Defendant and NHS (Wales) documents served on the Claimant during the course of his 22nd June 2009 arrest to his 10th Feb 2009 Crown Court machine-gun acquittal, requiring no need for defense evidence for an obvious acquittal, after the 2nd day, in the view of the jury is indictable enough of proof of an over-arching conspiracy
2. 1st, 2nd 3rd and 4th breach of restraining order jury trials, ending in T20170239, also revealing an over-arching conspiracy using fake MAPPA data to procure an application that the Claimant be incarcerated in Ashworth, indefinitely, reliant on the false information within the CPS data presented to juries, GMC, RCVS, IPCC, CCRC & foreign jurisdictions.
3. Defendant disclosure of Claimant’s 22nd May 1993 police interview tape identifying fabricated indictable offences whilst having successfully applied to have him remanded in custody until ‘identified’ when actually delaying on the fantasy the Guernsey police would extradite their victim back to the Bailiwick.
4. The thirty-three failed malicious prosecutions, in case number BS614159 +2 others, 4th action D00CF279, 5th action (false imprisonment), 7th C90CF012 and 8th action, all before the Cardiff County court, also contain an over-arching view of a malicious based conspiracy so easily proven by the simple disclosure of police and court records all under the control of the Defendant but repeatedly DENIED to the Claimant when DENIED in 2013 substantive trial with over one hundred witnesses.
5. Refusal by Defendant to disclose Defendant’s Feb 2009 sworn affidavit confirming full disclosure in first 33 failed Defendant malicious prosecutions, the subject of BS614159 +2others claims
6. The above documents within the above examples are all in the control of the Defendant
FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:
NB: DISCLAIMER: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.