OUTRAGEOUS! Local Authority enables false allegations by a mother who at the same time covers up abuse by sex offender step parent allowing him contact with a child he abused.

via Local Authority enables false allegations by a mother who at the same time covers up abuse by sex offender step parent allowing him contact with a child he abused.

Quote | Posted on by | 1 Comment

Support Tommy Robinson on the 27th Sept. at the Old Bailey, London, EC4M 7EH. 10.30am + archive

Tommy Robinson
07 Sept 2018

4 hrs · 

Look at the inscription above the Old Bailey. ‘Defend the Children of the poor & punish the wrongdoer’
Quite ironic then that they are continuing the persecution of Tommy there on the 27th.
Tommy has spent the last 10 years highlighting the rape, persecution and cover up by the establishment of those poor children it speaks of! Support Tommy on the 27th at the Old Bailey, London, EC4M 7EH. 10.30am 👊

Image may contain: text

Tommy Robinson
Public Figure
 

Thursday, 16 August 2018

“WHAT A LOT OF TOMMY ROT”: How “change.org” earnt thousands on the back of Tommy Robinson’s jailing recently – Private Eye

 
What a lot of Tommy rot
Change.org, Issue 1476

 

tommy
Tommy Robinson, whose release from jail has proved a goldmine for the social justice warriors at Change.org

WHEN the appeal court released Tommy Robinson from prison, the social justice warriors at Change.org must have been almost as jubilant as the Anglo-American far right.Change.org calls itself “the world’s platform for change”, but it seems just as keen as Facebook to use fake news to generate revenue: the 631,000 people who signed its “Theresa May MP: Free Tommy Robinson” petition produced tens of thousands of pounds for the right-on Silicon Valley hipsters.

Everything about the petition was phoney. Its author was anonymous, and its 81 words included several hefty howlers.
 
Grooming gangs
“Tommy Robinson,” it began, “has been arrested and jailed for reporting on Muslim grooming gangs.” No: he was jailed for breaking a court order of the type regularly imposed by judges to protect fair trials. The appeal court did not overturn the verdict because it was a dictatorial suppression of free speech – it said the case should be reheard because of a “muddle over the nature of the contempt being considered”.
The anonymous petitioner continued: “Robinson [was] reporting on issues that our mainstream media are too afraid to speak of.” Wrong again. The Times has led the way in investigating grooming gangs, while all journalists will be free to report the alleged crimes in Leeds once the risk of prejudicing juries has passed.
 
Real goldmine
Finally, the petition asserted Robinson had been jailed because he had informed “the public of all the wrongs committed in the name of Allah”. Change.org’s guidelines ban petitions that “attack or malign an entire class of people” because of their religion. But it had compelling and profitable reasons to ignore its rules. Like all petitions on its site, the Robinson one concluded with a jolly appeal to signatories to hand over their dosh: “You’re a hero. Help this petition reach its signature goal! Every £25 will advertise this petition to 833 extra people.”
However, the real goldmine for the company is the signatories’ personal data, which it can sell on to paying sponsors. It tells users: “We display advertising in the form of sponsored petitions, which are similar to sponsored videos on YouTube, sponsored links on Google, or sponsored tweets on Twitter.” The Italian magazine L’Espresso published a price list showing that Change.org charges “€1.50 per email if a client buys less than 10,000, up to €0.85 per email if the number goes above 500,000”.
 
Tapped for donations
Meanwhile, posing as the brave dissident “reporting on issues that our mainstream media are too afraid to speak of” has brought Robinson five-figure donations from American right-wingers. The publicity his stunt generated has driven viewers to his videos on the Rebel Media site and given him a cut of the revenue generated by the traffic, while the 853,300 people who have been drawn to his Facebook page can be, and are, tapped for donations. Fear not: if fake news about Robinson leads to trouble on the streets and attacks on British Muslims, Change.org will be happy to help you protest with a petition.
‘Ratbiter’
More top stories in the latest issue:

TYCOON WARNING
Despite a damning Charity Commission verdict on the sleazy antics of the Presidents Club, its three wealthy trustees go on the warpath against the FT.


THE REBEKAH FILES
Eyebrows are raised as the Sun calls in Cheryl Carter, Rebekah Brooks’ former PA and co-defendant, to help with the paper’s half-century celebrations.


TARGET PRACTICE
Twitter launches a new set of paid advertising tools to target users based on the topics they are discussing. So nothing to worry about there then…


GRIMES WATCH
Wildly misleading claims abound as ex-BeLeaver Darren Grimes raises cash to launch a legal challenge to the Electoral Commission’s finding against him.


COURT CIRCULAR
How Clarence House hopes to rehabilitate Prince Brian after his toe-curling letters to a disgraced bishop are made public at the child sexual abuse tribunal.


NOOKS & CORNERS
Rescue is as far away as ever for the sadly neglected Georgian assize court now ‘in a state of slow decay’ in Devizes.


SPEECH MARKS
As radical preacher Anjem Choudary’s expected release from jail looms, his supporters are out and about talking nonsense at Speakers’ Corner.

To read all the latest Private Eye news, get the latest edition – you can subscribe here and have the magazine delivered to your home every fortnight.

Next issue on sale: 21st August 2018

source:   http://www.private-eye.co.uk/issue-1476/news

Wednesday, 8 August 2018

Tommy Robinson interview on Tucker Carlson on the outrageous abuse suffered recently VIDEO + archive

Chilling interview: Tommy Robinson with Tucker Carlson

Published on 3 Aug 2018

Wednesday, 1 August 2018

UPDATE: CH.4 NEWS CLIP – TOMMY ROBINSON BAILED AFTER COURT OF APPEAL WIN! VIDEO

totally true “all the media do is lie”

Tommy Robinson released from prison on bail

Published on 1 Aug 2018

LIVE: Outside Royal Courts of Justice following Tommy Robinson’s appeal win

 RT UK Streamed live 6 hours ago


Tommy RobinsonImage copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image cap
tionTommy Robinson founded the English Defence League in 2009 but quit the group in 2013

Tommy Robinson bailed after Court of Appeal win

Far-right activist Tommy Robinson has been bailed after winning an appeal against a finding of contempt of court.
Robinson, 35, from Luton, admitted the charge and received a 13-month jail term in May over a film outside Leeds Crown Court during a trial.
At the Court of Appeal, Lord Chief Justice Lord Burnett ruled there had been technical flaws by the judge who jailed him and quashed the finding.
Robinson’s solicitors said everyone has the “right to a fair hearing”.
Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley Lennon, was not present for the ruling and is expected to be released from prison later.
In his written judgement, Lord Burnett said: “We are satisfied that the finding of contempt made in Leeds following a fundamentally flawed process, in what we recognise were difficult and unusual circumstances, cannot stand.
“We will direct that the matter be reheard before a different judge.”
Supporters and protesters outside courtImage copyrightPA
Tommy Robinson supporters and protesters gathered outside The Royal Courts of Justice
A film involving people in a criminal trial that was subject to reporting restrictions was recorded and the footage broadcast on social media.
The footage, lasting about an hour, was watched 250,000 times within hours of being posted on Facebook.
A statement from his solicitors said: “The rule of law and right to a fair hearing are fundamental to every individual and this ruling is an example of the safeguards of our system.”
Robinson will attend the Old Bailey for the Leeds allegation to be reheard.
He had challenged two contempt of court findings but Lord Burnett said a suspended sentence he was given relating to a trial in Canterbury in May 2017 should stand.
The former English Defence League (EDL) leader was given 10 months for contempt of court in Leeds and a further three months for breaching the suspended sentence handed to him in Canterbury.
Lord Burnett, in his written judgement, said Robinson attended Canterbury Crown Court during a rape trial and filmed on the steps of the court and inside the building.
Presentational grey line

Analysis: By Dominic Casciani, BBC home affairs correspondent

This morning, the Lord Chief Justice’s ruling in Robinson’s appeal underlined that the rule of law – the rules that apply to us all – must be applied fairly in all circumstances.
And that’s why the Court of Appeal ruled that Robinson’s second conviction in a year for contempt of court was flawed. In essence, the five hours from arrest to sentence at Leeds Crown Court was rushed.
Robinson wasn’t told what specific parts of his activity at the court had been potentially prejudicial to a jury – meaning nobody to this day knows exactly what he did wrong.
Further, he immediately removed the offending video from Facebook on the court’s order and the judge should have then adjourned the matter to give him longer to prepare a defence.
Tommy Robinson is still convicted of contempt in relation to his behaviour at Canterbury last year where he received his three month sentence for potentially derailing a fair trial.
Today, the Court of Appeal said that very same right to a fair hearing means Robinson should have a full opportunity to put his case without rushing to judge.
Presentational grey line
At an earlier hearing, Robinson’s QC argued that procedural “deficiencies” had caused “prejudice” in Leeds.
Lord Burnett said the judge should not have commenced contempt proceedings the same day he was arrested.
He explained “no particulars of the contempt were formulated or put to the appellant”, and there was “a muddle over the nature of the contempt being considered”.
Rival groups of Tommy Robinson supporters and “Stand Up To Racism” protesters gathered outside the Royal Courts of Justice and swapped chants.
Both groups of about 30 people were outnumbered by watching police.
Presentational grey line

Who is Tommy Robinson?

Tommy RobinsonImage copyrightAFP
Born in 1982, Tommy Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, describes himself as “a working-class man from Luton”.
  • Aged 20, he joined the far-right British National Party but soon left saying “it was not for me”
  • In 2009 he set up the English Defence League (EDL) – an organisation set up to counter what its members saw as the threat of Islamic extremism
  • The EDL organised street marches and demonstrations which often clashed with anti-racism campaigners
  • He married in 2011 and is the father of three children
  • He left the EDL in 2013 expressing concern that he no longer felt he could keep extremist elements within the organisation at bay
  • Talking to BBC Radio Five Live, he said: “I don’t want to lead the revolution against the Muslims. I believe that the revolution needs to come from within the Islamic community and they need to stand up.”
  • source:  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-45029755
  • Sunday, 27 May 2018

    “Tommy Robinson supporters say he is in ‘grave danger’ in Hull Prison” + the arrest – 27 May ’18 VIDEO

     “The Rebel” PETITION FOR INVESTIGATION INTO TOMMY ROBINSON UNPRECEDENTED JAILING –
     

    Tommy Robinson supporters say he is in ‘grave danger’ in Hull Prison

    The former EDL leader was taken to the Hedon Road jail after being arrested on Friday

    Supporters of former EDL leader Tommy Robinson are urging people to write to him in Hull Prison – where they say he is in “grave danger”.
    Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Lennon, was taken to the Hedon Road jail after being arrested in Leeds on Friday.

    He had been filming men entering Leeds Crown Court, where a grooming trial is taking place.
    Robinson was arrested for allegedly breaching the peace after an hour of broadcasting.
    As he was being bundled into a police van, Robinson was heard to say: He said: “This is ridiculous. I haven’t said a word. I’ve done nothing. This isn’t contempt of court. You are allowed to do this, aren’t you?”
    Contempt of court is a criminal offence that can see people jailed for speeches or publications that create a “substantial risk that the course of justice in the proceedings in question will be seriously impeded or prejudiced.”

    Former English Defence League (EDL) leader Tommy Robinson
    Former English Defence League (EDL) leader Tommy Robinson

    Supporters say he was taken into the courtroom and jailed for 13 months.
    Posting on Facebook, Helen Lel Gower wrote: “Due to the reporting restrictions set down by the Judge I am unable to report on anything said or done in the Court room other than Tommy was given 13 months for Contempt of Court and immediately taken to Prison.

    “Tommy’s Solicitor is meeting Tommy on Tuesday to discuss what next steps can be taken, if any, she was deliberately mislead by the Police who informed her on the phone that he was being released and when she asked for confirmation that he would be released and that there was no need for her to travel to Leeds they informed her that was correct.

    “The Police immediately took Tommy to the Court and appointed a Court Solicitor who was useless.”

    HMP Hull in Hedon Road
    HMP Hull in Hedon Road (Image: Jack Harland)

    She urged people to contact Robinson to send “messages of support, money for postage stamps, phone calls and food/toiletries”.
    She added: “Tommy is okay so far.”


    Another supporter wrote on YouTube: “TOMMY will be well looked after in hull prison he knows all the top boys from Grimsby who know all the top lads in hull it’s our local jail rest assured TOMMY will be treated as a legend.”

    Writing on Twitter, Kenny Hawks said: “HEY PEOPLE .. PLEASE SIGN THIS PETITION AND HELP TOMMY ROBINSON … HIS LIFE IS IN GRAVE DANGER IN HULL PRISON … SIGN THIS NOW AND GET ALL YOUR FRIENDS TO SIGN IT …. THIS IS FOR ALL OUR FREEDOMS.”

    Tommy Robinson speaking in Leicester
    Tommy Robinson speaking in Leicester

    Mr Robinson was serving a suspended sentence for committing contempt of court during a gang rape case last year when he was arrested on Friday.
    He was handed a three-month jail sentence last May, but saw it suspended for 18 months.

    He has also spent time as the joint party vice-chairman of the British Freedom Party, and has more recently worked with think tank Quilliam to discuss alternative ways of tackling extremism.

    source: https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/hull-east-yorkshire-news/tommy-robinson-supporters-say-grave-1612735


    See more:

    I am trying to recall a legal case where someone was convicted of a ‘crime’ which cannot be reported on. Where he can be cast into prison without it being possible to report his name, offence, or place of imprisonment for fear of contempt of court. Can anyone remember such a case


    Tommy Robinson supporter empties can of Stella on top of Downing Street gates 


    Calls to go to Downing Street, 3pm Sunday 27th May “Tommy Robinson arrested outside child grooming trial for ‘breaching the peace’ 


    Outrageous TOMMY ROBINSON ARRESTED

    .

    FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
    Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107
    NB: DISCLAIMER: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.

    05:00, 27 MAY 2018

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

UPDATED: WHO WANTED KAY SHUT UP? + THE HIGHGATE CHARITY SCAM: B Mackenzie, Sabine Mcneil

UPDATED: WHO WANTED KAY SHUT UP? + THE HIGHGATE CHARITY SCAM: B Mackenzie, Sabine Mcneil

WHO WANTED KAY SHUT UP?

“Kay was a strong Musa family supporter. right from the very beginning of the family’s troubles – her story is online.

On a date in January 2012 I was staying at B Mckenzies house in N London and I was speaking on my mobile phone to Kay, and we were discussing the merits of the asst. solicitor for Musas defence. This conversation took some 15 minutes or so and I found out at a date shortly after that after my call to Kay Sabine Mcneil had called Kay directly after I had finished speaking with Kay to berate her most strongly, shouting at her over the phone about her and myself criticising the asst. solicitor. What had happened was that Ms. Mckenzie had gone into another room from where she was overhearing my conversation with Kay and had called Mcneil whilst I was on my mobile to Kay, telling Mcneil about our criticising the asst. solicitor. I was surprised Mckenzie could do this as I was actually on the phone to Kay when she called Mcneil from another room – a room used as her office. Both myself and Kay had been critical of the defence team, and obviously Mcneil and Mckenzie would hear no wrong said about them – would hear no wrong about a defence team who performed miserably throughout the trial omitting much vital evidence, calling only 2 witnesses for the Musas defence to the prosecutions 44, and a whole lot more. I, and others, believe this lame performance was premeditated and deliberate. The Musas have now done 25 months in prison – that certainly was no defence team – and Mcneils angry attack on Kay, and myself indirectly via that phone call defending these legal types I believe says a lot – that no way should this defence team be criticised in any way, possibly leading to a change of defence representatives for the Musas. That way the defence team would be kept, to perform a dismal performance pretending to defend these tortured parents, and the M’s would go on to receive their lengthy sentence of 7 years each, plus the added torture of losing 7 children!

Kay was intimidated so much by the authorities for being a worthy supporter that she had to flee the country. leaving all her possessions and everything behind, in order to stay with her child who, she alleges, was to be taken from her because she was a Musa supporter and basically knew the score about things, so she left everything overnight and fled to Eire to try and get away from this unacceptable victimisation, but the long arm of collusion and intimidation followed her to Eire where her life was immediately made unbearable there too – she was denied any benefits, having to rely on friends and finding it almost impossible to get accomodation at first {the landlords siding with the authorities} the balatant vindictiveness grew from the locals who had been fed a pack of lies by certain people making her stay there an extremely unpleasant one, and after 7 months she finally gave in and returned from whence she came after realising her life and that of her child may have very much have been in danger there. A typical email received at the time from Kay:

From: k

Sent: 26 January 2012 11:14:51
 To: me

Hello J,

Sorry, I just do not feel I can trust anyone anymore to evenexplain…. PLEASE DO NOT TAKE THIS PERSONALLY. I am very much alone here – -CERTAIN THE PERSON/S who originallyhelped me when I got here – HAVE BEEN PAID OFF….. they couldsuddenly afford to DECORATE THEIR HOME DESPITE 1 being a STUDENT andthe other ON DISABILITY ALLOWANCE… The person let slip the wallpaper they were putting around their fire place cost the equivalent of£10 A ROLL!!! I also noticed a GREEN ‘P’ FOR PASSED SIGN on their car (which hasnow suddenly changed back to a ‘RED’ ‘L’ SIGN — after she had seenme … ANOTHER PERSON who was involved in helping me when I got here— when I saw her in TESCO HERE – DID NOT ASK ME “Hello, how are youdoing?” – BUT ASKED ME “HELLO, WHEN ARE YOU GOING BACK TO ENGLAND!”. I am disappointed that even someone who had lost HER CHILDREN to UK SShas done this to me too.. Sadly, she is trusted amongst many otherswho help people. Tc – K
——————————————————+

From: kay
 Sent: 26 January 2012 11:34:00
 To: me

John – thank you for your message.. (below) – I AM PREPARING those who know / care for me to EXPECT MY DEATH / FALSE IMPRISONMENT / SECTION TO A MENTAL INSTITUTION AND / OR MY CHILD BEING TAKEN FROM ME…. WHICH WILL ALSO BE FABRICATED.

I HAVE HAD TO – ESPECIALLY NOW I KNOW 100% there are MORE PERSONS INVOLVED IN HATFIELD, HERTFORDSHIRE – where I lived and in the ‘Adult Mental Health’ Depts there.

I feel so very sick….. and sad … and alone …. and gutted ….. and scared for my child and all children…

I HOPE THEY ALL ROT IN HELL FOR THEIR WICKEDNESS.

Take care – let me know how you get on today. K

—————————————————
From: butlincat
 To: kay
 Subject: RE: LOST
 Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:17:16 +0000

hey = dont get too despondant…things might not turn out as bad as you think…try and stay positive and you are not alone…and anyway i will always try and help you, and in reality i dont tink ill be going anywhere for quite a while, even tho i say stupid things to the opposite, so please just try and stay positive or it will be no good…bye for now
—————————————————-

I for one contacted numerous government departments and figures about this entire situation to be ignored wholesale every time I wrote by each and every one contacted.
 During the unpleasantness of Kays return i was appalled to get an email from someone who claims outright to help people in exactly the position Kay Young was in. I received the email below which i found outrageous in the fact that the person wanted Kay “shut up” as she was deemed “a problem” by this character. I was shocked at the hypocracy – the email =

“From: b.mckenzie@
 > To: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk

> Subject: Musas

> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:56:08 +0000>

> Hi John

> Are you OK? haven’t heard from you in a while. Have you given up on

> the Musas? I don’t blame you not being able to come up so often

> anymore, it’s a miracle you managed that awful journey as many times as

you did.>

> Yesterday Haringey weren’t ready to start the proceedings, had only

> just served the indictment!

> So the ‘Plea & Case Management’ hearing has been deferred till 29th

> February. Another month!

> Don & new barrister Mr O (couldn’t quite get his name) seem confident

> there are enough cards in the Musas’ hands to win this criminal case.

> But in the meantime adoption proceedings commence this month and the

> final care hearing is next month which is why Haringey are delaying

> things.

> Must tell you that Kay is a problem. Not only did she send abusive

> emails to the family doctor (which is why bail was refused, but of

> course any excuse) but she’s also been sending really rude ones to Don, he

showed them to me.

> “She is not helping the Musas doing this kind of thing” he said, I agreed.

> Is there any way of shutting her up? but I know she can be prickly.

> Can you try please, John?

> Really hope everything’s OK with you! Also that chap you’re in touch

> with every day.

> Love

> Belindax”

The emails mentioned that Kay is supposed to have sent is an outright gross exagerration, and blatant lies have been told about them – premeditated exagerrated lies used by the incompetant puppets the defence team who were only too happy to have something to hold against Kay Young.No emails from Kay have ever been produced in or out of court and the mentioning of them is being deliberately used as some kind of tool against her – a nonsensical tool to make her seem erratic, unpredictable and even not worthy of trust. If anybody should have been called as a witness in the Musa trial Kay should of been as she was there from the very beginning of the case, but with stuff like this being thrown at her making her seem irresponsible it is easy to see why she wasnt called. Actually only 2 witnesses out of a potentially huge figure were actually called but that is down to the failings of the cdefence team and a seperate subject. Anyway a certain person has admitted sending emails to members of the defence team UNDER AN ASUMED NAME – this i have in writing in an email from that person – also linked closely to Mcneil and this farcical “Mckenzie friend” set-up.

The asst. solicitor for the defence team used the excuses prior to the picking of the witnesses for the defence that Kay wouldnt be called as a witness because she might “lose it” whilst in the witness box, as he told me personally one day during the beginning of the Musa criminal trial, beginning May 2012. He seemed to think she might get angry and upset and thus do damage perhaps to the case, thus depriving the Musas of a valuable witness, and blackening her good name at the same time. Note this asst. solicitor has never ever met Kay, or even spoken to her, and is basing his outrageous assumptions on total rubbish got from people such as who wrote the rubbish email to me above telling me Kay is a “problem” and should be “shut up”. The entire subject of any emails that Kay is supposed to have sent is not worth bothering about, and I know for a fact many people have sent emails to the defence team complaining about their poor performance when defending the Musas – I myself have made my feelings known to these characters and i know of others who have admitted using false names when writing to them on the subject. Note only Kay is ever mentioned regarding sending emails to the defence team – and noone else.
 Certain people did want Kay Young “shut up”, and as has been shown they would use the most underhand method of trying to achieve that aim, even asking me to do it!!

Also, in between the end of the Musa criminal trial and the date the initial appeal docs had to be given in by to the court – around the end of July and mid Autumn respectively – lunches were held between at least mcneil, and probably mckenzie, with the defence team barristers in London – probably at some up market café somewhere. This assembly could only have met to discuss what must have been the topic of the day – the Musas had been sentenced and with the appeal coming up there was only one thing to discuss – what was going to make up the appeal submission – something to this day Chiwar Musa has never seen! No other Musa supporters knew about these clandestine meetings taking place whatsoever, even though certain longtime supporters had a much greater knowledge of the case than this pair put together along with the barristers and others that attended these meetings. Why has Chiwar never been allowed to see his own defence appeal submission? Could the submission have been so lame and lacking in proper substance Chiwar would have objected greatly to its contents? That is a good question – Chiwar has asked for a very long time for his appeal docs, but never got them. I have asked the court on his behalf as a Mckenzie friend too for them – even going along to the appeal court itself and asking – but always the request is refused, and my recorded delivery letter to the defence barrister asking for the docs was returned unoped by the post office a month after sending. Anyway, secret meetings and the consequent results of appeals and the behaviour of certain legal representatives I feel speak for themselves. Dark breeds more dark – and every appeal the Musas have put forward have all failed.
 I was told the information about these clandestine meetings by another supporter who had got fed up with certain things via emails, [which i still have], and decided to tell me about these these meetings, and more that i wasnt aware of.
 My questions are – how come no long term supporters were present at these meetings? There isn’t exactly a shortage of them. Remember only 2 witnesses were called at all out of the many supporters the Musas had at the their “criminal” trial, where both Gloria and Chiwar received 7 years imprisonment each. I had met and stayed many times with the Musas since meeting them in April 2011 – Kay had known and supported them for over a year longer, and been through hell and back because of the actions taken against her by certain authorities [something the mcneil and mckenzies of this world always ignore], yet we have always been treated as idiots by this defence team, and by mcneil and mcKenzie also – a typical example being the holding of clandestine lunches. I still maintain they know little of the case – events and details I witnessed whilst with them at hearings or whatever and those things Kay had witnessed from before i came along that Chiwar and Gloria had taken hours telling me about during my stays with them. I had gone on contact visits with Chiwar and Gloria to see their children [I waited in a cafe nearby] a few times and seen for myself how they were mistreated at the contact centre miles away in Surrey 20 miles away as the crow flies – or a whole lot longer via train, tube and bus, and then a 30 minute walk on arrival at Croyden. Often the contact centre would be shut upon arriving on a preorganised visit, or Chiwar would be ejected from the contact meeting with some of his siblings after only 10 minutes. I saw how the council refused to pay the Musas travel expenses for over 40 contact visit journeys – something the Musas were fully entitled to, and I saw the invalid and void travel warrants or tickets they were given to use on these journeys, and how, when they complained to the council showing them the accumulated 40+ void travel tickets the council, and even a judge once, completely ignored their complaints and refused to honour their responsibilities to reimburse their travel costs by law they were entitles to. These contact visit journeys with the void travel warrants went on from April 2010 until November 2011, and half the time the children the Musas had hoped to see werent even brought to the contact visit, with lame excuses being made as to why the children didnt attend.
 Anyway, I digress.
 So, the appeal submission documents Chiwar Musa does not have and has not seen surely were originated at these clandestine lunches, and discussed between these 2 so-called “supporters” and this lame defence team.
 The female barrister representing Gloria never visited her once – not once – throughout Gloria’s imprisonment beginning Nov. 28 2011. The other barrister representing Chiwar went hardly once or twice also. The assistant solicitor, making up the final member of this defence team, also hardly visited the Musas whilst imprisoned as he should have. What a team!! The female barrister representing Gloria didn’t bother either turning up at the final criminal appeal, held in Febuary 2014, which, of course, failed miserably. New details for the appeal submission – a revised and much fuller and more relavent medical statement written by a biochemist supporter – was submitted but ignored out of hand. This entire case has been riddled with serious irregularities from day one – not helped by these so-called “supporters” mentioned already.

There is a lot more that should be put here, but that will have to suffice for now.

This is a true sworn statement – J. Graham  [ends]

[the “UK Column” reads my report immediately after the rough justice imposed upon the Musa parents Bishop Gloria, and Chiwar when they both received 7 years imprisonment for allegedly “mistreating their children” after their dubious 6+ week criminal trial – the verdict issued on the 14 August 2012:   https://vid.me/NXPk.

Although promising to do this and that regarding this shocking case, this brief mention, which aired a couple of days after the actual sentencing of the Musa parents was the sum total of this “UK Column”‘s interest. And please, don’t be put off by Mr. Gerrish’s misleading statement at the beginning of this clip that the case was “confusing” – it was most definitely not , and the very much fabricated case against the Musa parents was as clear as it was criminal, and the irregularities performed by government employees  – from the town council [previously involved in the outrageous “Baby P” [Peter Connelly] tragedy]  to the police involved, and a great deal more government departments – were infinite as they were outrageous!

—————————————————————

 Former MP John Hemming, ex-Yardley, Birmingham MP, is very much involved with this “McKenzie Friends Group” set-up, alongside other members – the group’s founder B. McKenzie and her friend Sabine Mcneil and is, allegedly,  a “gatekeeper” [a gatherer of info – that info then used for nefarious purposes].  Why did he do nothing about the decade-long Birmingham child scandal when it was in full flow? He was an MP in Birmingham for 5 years during the shocking scandal which is reported as going on for at least 10 years!

See: “Child sexual exploitation bombshell as official report reveals almost 500 victims and potential victims in Birmingham and West Midlands”:http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/child-sexual-exploitation-bombshell-official-8862316


“McKenzie Friends Group Exposed“

see more:

https://butlincat.blogspot.co.uk/2016/12/mckenzie-friends-group-exposed.html

==============================================================

Re: B. Mckenzie’s “Knight Foundation“:

“Highgate company investigated for posing as child abuse charity and sending donations to UK fugitive” [NB – this article has now been removed from the Internet – i wonder why???].

http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/cmlink/hampstead-highgate-express-broadway/news/crime-court/highgate_company_investigated_for_posing_as_child_abuse_charity_and_sending_donations_to_uk_fugitive_1_4165612

[don’t forget about the [alleged] “fire”, that destroyed the paper trails…ed.]

PUBLISHED: 07:00 24 July 2015 | UPDATED: 09:14 19 October 2015

Belinda McKenzie outside the Royal Courts of Justice

Belinda McKenzie outside the Royal Courts of Justice

Archant

The Charity Commission is investigating claims that a Highgate-based organisation has been masquerading as a charity – including revelations that it sent almost all its donations to a fugitive wanted for questioning by police.

Sabine McNeill fled the UK through fear of arrest Sabine McNeill fled the UK through fear of arrest

An investigation by the Ham&High has discovered that a company claiming to raise money to help “protect children from sexual abuse” had been misleading potential donors as part of a drive to raise £1million.

The Knight Foundation, set up in February 2014, said the money would go towards helping fight “cruelty against children” and “Satanic ritual abuse”.

But the Ham&High has discovered that the organisation is not registered with the government watchdog the Charity Commission and that almost all the donations received are being sent to Sabine McNeill – a fugitive wanted for questioning by UK police.

Her colleague Belinda McKenzie, one of the directors of The Knight Foundation, has been leading the donation drive from her home in Priory Gardens, Highgate.

The 69-year-old told the Ham&High: “We are aiming to become a charity and are at the early stages of the organisation.

“I see our work as charitable as it’s helping others, including my friend Sabine who had to leave the UK or face arrest. She needs financial support for her work, speaking to MEPs about child abuse in the UK. But I will consider amending the wording on our website.”

Ms McNeill, 70, fled from her home in Swiss Cottage earlier this year following her involvement in a case which saw now discredited allegations spread over the internet that a Satanic paedophile ring was operating out of a school and church in Hampstead.

In March, a judge found the claims to be “baseless” and said they had led to many innocent Hampstead families suffering death threats and abuse.

Ms McNeill, who is acting secretary of The Knight Foundation, is thought to have absconded to Germany amidst fears of being arrested.

The Knight Foundation recently ramped up fundraising efforts, with Ms McKenzie posting messages on the organisation’s website every day for the past three weeks urging those wanting to fight “the very worst kind of child abuse” to donate to the “charity”.

After this newspaper’s findings were passed to the Charity Commission, the regulatory authority confirmed the organisation was not registered and said it had been “misleading” potential donors.

Describing its work as “not wholly charitable”, the Commission added it would also be looking further into the company “to assess if there are any other regulatory concerns”.

=============================================================

UPDATE:  If this article is untrue, how come the publishers of it haven’t been sued for LIBEL?

libel

ˈlʌɪb(ə)l/

noun

noun: libel; plural noun: libels

  1. 1.

    Law

    a published false statement that is damaging to a person’s reputation; a written defamation.

— And the ensuing [and alleged] “fire” – the destruction of relavent documents [audit trail] pertaining to this despicable subject – what went on there?

N.B. As a messenger of news like the entire post above I am derided and slandered by certain idiots [especially one in Canada [and her cronies] – a neer-do-well who has already tried to set up someone very much targeted by authorities, of which there is ample evidence – unspeakable!!!] – some stupidly well known in this “activist scene”.  I couldn’t care less who does what to myself – it will only spur me on to try 10 times harder to bring perfectly relevent subjects, such as this scam involving this “Knight Foundation” charity set-up, to the spotlight,

—————————————

FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

NB: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“SNOOPERS CHARTER RULED UNLAWFUL” + #spycops [“Undercover Policing” abuse] + GCHQ SPYING, SNOWDEN, MASS SURVEILLANCE + more

UK mass digital surveillance regime ruled unlawful

Judges say snooper’s charter lacks adequate safeguards around accessing personal data

 Home affairs editor

A man on his mobile phone walks past a CCTV sign

 Appeal court judges have ruled the government’s mass digital surveillance regime unlawfulin a case brought by the Labour deputy leader, Tom Watson.

Liberty, the human rights campaign group which represented Watson in the case, said the ruling meant significant parts of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 – known as the snooper’s charter – are effectively unlawful and must be urgently changed.

The court of appeal ruling on Tuesday said the powers in the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014, which paved the way for the snooper’s charter legislation, did not restrict the accessing of confidential personal phone and web browsing records to investigations of serious crime, and allowed police and other public bodies to authorise their own access without adequate oversight.The government defended its use of communications data to fight serious and organised crime and said that the judgment related to out of date legislation. Minister Ben Wallace said that it would not affect the way law enforcement would tackle crime.

The three judges said Dripa was “inconsistent with EU law” because of this lack of safeguards, including the absence of “prior review by a court or independent administrative authority”.
Responding to the ruling, Watson said: “This legislation was flawed from the start. It was rushed through parliament just before recess without proper parliamentary scrutiny.

The government must now bring forward changes to the Investigatory Powers Act to ensure that hundreds of thousands of people, many of whom are innocent victims or witnesses to crime, are protected by a system of independent approval for access to communications data. I’m proud to have played my part in safeguarding citizens’ fundamental rights.”
Martha Spurrier, the director of Liberty, said: “Yet again a UK court has ruled the government’s extreme mass surveillance regime unlawful. This judgement tells ministers in crystal clear terms that they are breaching the public’s human rights.”

She said no politician was above the law. “When will the government stop bartering with judges and start drawing up a surveillance law that upholds our democratic freedoms?”

The Home Office announced a series of safeguards in November in anticipation of the ruling. They include removing the power of self-authorisation for senior police officers and requiring approval for requests for confidential communications data to be granted by the new investigatory powers commissioner. Watson and other campaigners said the safeguards were “half-baked” and did not go far enough.

The judges, headed by Sir Geoffrey Vos, declined to rule on the Home Office claim that the more rigorous “Watson safeguards” were not necessary for the use of bulk communications data for wider national security purposes.
The judges said the appeal court did not need to rule on this point because it had already been referred to the European court of justice in a case which is due to be heard in February.


Watson launched his legal challenge in 2014 in partnership with David Davis, who withdrew when he entered the government as Brexit secretary in 2016. The European court of justice ruled in December 2016 that the “general and indiscriminate retention” of confidential personal communications data was unlawful without safeguards, including independent judicial authorisation.
Security minister Ben Wallace responded to the ruling saying: “Communications data is used in the vast majority of serious and organised crime prosecutions and has been used in every major security service counter-terrorism investigation over the last decade. It is often the only way to identify paedophiles involved in online child abuse as it can be used to find where and when these horrendous crimes have taken place.”
He said the judgment related to legislation which was no longer in force and did not change the way in which law enforcement agencies could detect and disrupt crimes.

We had already announced that we would be amending the Investigatory Powers Act to address the two areas in which the court of appeal has found against the previous data retention regime. We welcome the fact that the court of appeal ruling does not undermine the regime and we will continue to defend these vital powers, which Parliament agreed were necessary in 2016, in ongoing litigation,” he said.
source: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jan/30/uk-mass-digital-surveillance-regime-ruled-unlawful-appeal-ruling-snoopers-charter

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Now anyone can be hacked by government –  going back a year “in police investigations”…yeah right. Bang goes the right of privacy – ECHR Article 8: Article 8 – Right to respect for private and family life
1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.
2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_8_of_the_European_Convention_on_Human_Rights]
.

Britain has passed the ‘most extreme surveillance law ever passed in a democracy’

The law forces UK internet providers to store browsing histories — including domains visited — for one year, in case of police investigations.
It’s 2016 going on 1984.
The UK has just passed a massive expansion in surveillance powers, which critics have called “terrifying” and “dangerous”.
The new law, dubbed the “snoopers’ charter”, was introduced by then-home secretary Theresa May in 2012, and took two attempts to get passed into law following breakdowns in the previous coalition government.
Four years and a general election later — May is now prime minister — the bill was finalized and passed on Wednesday by both parliamentary houses.
But civil liberties groups have long criticized the bill, with some arguing that the law will let the UK government “document everything we do online”.
It’s no wonder, because it basically does.

The law will force internet providers to record every internet customer’s top-level web history in real-time for up to a year, which can be accessed by numerous government departments; force companies to decrypt data on demand — though the government has never been that clear on exactly how it forces foreign firms to do that that; and even disclose any new security features in products before they launch.
Not only that, the law also gives the intelligence agencies the power to hack into computers and devices of citizens (known as equipment interference), although some protected professions — such as journalists and medical staff — are layered with marginally better protections.
In other words, it’s the “most extreme surveillance law ever passed in a democracy,” according to Jim Killock, director of the Open Rights Group.
The bill was opposed by representatives of the United Nations, all major UK and many leading global privacy and rights groups, and a host of Silicon Valley tech companies alike. Even the parliamentary committee tasked with scrutinizing the bill called some of its provisions “vague”.
UK government "complicit" in NSA's PRISM spy program
Britain allegedly bypassed international intelligence-sharing treaties. Read More
And that doesn’t even account for the three-quarters of people who think privacy, which this law almost entirely erodes, is a human right.
There are some safeguards, however, such as a “double lock” system so that the secretary of state and an independent judicial commissioner must agree on a decision to carry out search warrants (though one member of the House of Lords disputed that claim).
A new investigatory powers commissioner will also oversee the use of the powers.
Despite the uproar, the government’s opposition failed to scrutinize any significant amendments and abstained from the final vote. Killock said recently that the opposition Labour party spent its time “simply failing to hold the government to account”.
But the government has downplayed much of the controversy surrounding the bill. The government has consistently argued that the bill isn’t drastically new, but instead reworks the old and outdated Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA). This was brought into law in 2000, to “legitimize” new powers that were conducted or ruled on in secret, like collecting data in bulk and hacking into networks, which was revealed during the Edward Snowden affair.
Much of those activities were only possible thanks to litigation by one advocacy group, Privacy International, which helped push these secret practices into the public domain while forcing the government to scramble to explain why these practices were legal.
The law will be ratified by royal assent in the coming weeks.
.

ZDNET INVESTIGATIONS

  1. Voices
  2. The Snooper’s Charter passed into law this week – say goodbye to your privacy

The fact that you’re on this website is – potentially – state knowledge. Service providers must now store details of everything you do online for 12 months – and make it accessible to dozens of public authorities

This week a law was passed that silently rips privacy from the modern world. It’s called the Investigatory Powers Act.

Under the guise of counter-terrorism, the British state has achieved totalitarian-style surveillance powers – the most intrusive system of any democracy in history. It now has the ability to indiscriminately hack, intercept, record, and monitor the communications and internet use of the entire population.
The hundreds of chilling mass surveillance programmes revealed by Edward Snowden in 2013 were – we assumed – the result of a failure of the democratic process. Snowden’s bravery finally gave Parliament and the public the opportunity to scrutinise this industrial-scale spying and bring the state back into check.

But, in an environment of devastatingly poor political opposition, the Government has actually extended state spying powers beyond those exposed by Snowden – setting a “world-leading” precedent.
The fact that you’re on this website is – potentially – state knowledge. Service providers must now store details of everything you do online for 12 months – and make it accessible to dozens of public authorities.
What does your web history look like? Does it reveal your political interests? Social networks? Religious ideas? Medical concerns? Sexual interests? Pattern of life?

What might the last year of your internet use reveal?
Government agencies have even won powers to hack millions of computers, phones and tablets en masse, leaving them vulnerable to further criminal attacks.

You might think that you have nothing to hide, and therefore nothing to fear. In that case, you may as well post your email and social media login details in the comments below.

But I don’t think we do feel that blasé about our privacy – we cherish our civil liberties. Everyone has a stake in guarding our democracy, protecting minorities from suspicionless surveillance, defending protest rights, freedom of the press, and enjoying the freedom to explore and express oneself online. These freedoms allow our thoughts, opinions and personalities to flourish and develop – they are the very core of democracy.   
Has any country in history given itself such extensive surveillance powers and remained a rights-respecting democracy? We need not look too far back – or overseas to see the risks of unbridled surveillance. In recent years, the British state has spied on law-abiding environmental activists, democratically elected politicians, victims of torture and police brutality, and hundreds of journalists.
In fact, as the Bill finally passed on Wednesday evening, I was training a group of British and American journalists in how to protect themselves from state surveillance – not just from Russia or Syria, but from their own countries.
When Edward Snowden courageously blew the whistle on mass surveillance he warned that, armed with such tools, a new leader might “say that ‘because of the crisis, because of the dangers we face in the world, some new and unpredicted threat, we need more authority, we need more power.’ And there will be nothing the people can do at that point to oppose it”.

The US finds itself with a President-elect who has committed to monitoring all mosques, banning all Muslims, investigating Black Lives Matter activists and deporting two to three million people. And with the ushering into law of the UK-US free trade in mass surveillance, MPs may have a lot to answer for.
Liberty and its members fought tooth and nail against this new law from its inception to the moment it was passed. That fight is not yet over. Our message to Government: see you in court.

Silkie Carlo is the policy officer at Liberty


The United Nations has passed a non-binding resolution condemning the disruption of Internet access as a human rights violation.
Russia and China were among countries opposing the resolution, which reaffirms the stance of the UN Human Rights Council that “the same rights people have offline must also be protected online.”
Saudi Arabia joined the two nations in their objections. But in addition to authoritarian regimes, democracies such as India and South Africa also disagreed and called for the deletion of the following passage:
Condemns unequivocally measures to intentionally prevent or disrupt access to or dissemination of information online in violation of international human rights law and calls on all States to refrain from and cease such measures.”
While not legally enforceable, a resolution such as this can help put pressure on governments and add weight to the arguments of digital rights groups.
Digital rights site Access Now’s Global Policy and Legal Counsel representative, Peter Micek, enlarged on this.
This unanimous statement by the world’s highest human rights body should give governments pause before they order blocking, throttling, and other barriers to information.”
Such throttling was witnessed in Turkey following the June 2016 attack on Istanbul’s Ataturk Airport, when social media sites were suppressed.
Access Now says at least 15 Internet shutdowns took place worldwide in 2015. So far in 2016, at least 20 shutdowns are known to have been put into place.

10 Dec. 2016 originally

 

SPYING ON US 12mar15

 

THE SNOOPERS CHARTER with GCHQ EXPERT + HOW GCHQ HAVE BEEN BREAKING THE LAW FOR 16 YEARS

A major row between the political parties is brewing over demands by David Cameron and the intelligence services for even more surveillance powers in the wake of the terrorist atrocities in Paris last week.

David Cameron has promised new legislation so that terrorists no longer have “safe spaces” to communicate.

Pointing out that in the old days, intelligence agencies  were able to open letters and eavesdrop on phone calls, the PM asked in a speech yesterday: “In our country, do we want to allow a means of communication between people which […] we cannot read?”

But today deputy PM Nick Clegg said such a response would be disproportionate and would “cross a line”.

The issue centres on the fact that technology is changing so fast that the laws on which security officials rely to give them access to communications are becoming obsolete almost as soon as they are written.

Here the Bureau explains why new legislation passed last summer is said to be already inadequate to keep Britons safe, what the government could do next and why the public debate must take account of GCHQ’s most realistic option – hacking.

What are the problems?

The Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act (DRIPA) was only passed last summer, having been fast-tracked through Parliament.

The new law extended the reach of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) which gives authorities interception powers.

Under DRIPA telecoms companies can also be required to keep billing data – information on who contacts whom, when and for how long on mobile networks but not the content of these messages – for up to 12 months and allow security officials to access it on production of a warrant.

This “meta-data” held by the companies is helpful in identifying associates of known terrorists or criminals. Law enforcement and security officials can use evidence of contact between parties to justify directly surveilling individuals and accessing the content of their communications.

But the law is already said to be becoming obsolete.

There are three main reasons for this:

1) People aren’t calling each other over mobile networks as often as they used to

Terrorists and serious criminals, like the general public, are using the internet to communicate instead, speaking to each other via social media sites, instant messaging services – including those provided by online games – and chat rooms.

Billing data doesn’t capture these exchanges.

2) Encryption

Intelligence agencies are increasingly finding that even when they have located the particular messages they want, the content is encrypted.

3) The data isn’t collected by UK telcos

Companies operating fixed line and mobile infrastructure such as BT and Vodafone may simply transport data to and from another company – such as Facebook or Twitter – to the customer with little or no data retained about the communication.

4) Some of the communications the spies want access to are held by service providers that are not based in the UK

Under DRIPA, interception warrants issued by UK authorities can be applied to overseas firms. As Liberty pointed out, the UK’s Home Secretary could serve Gmail with a warrant in California, requiring it to intercept all communications between subscribers in two specified countries or all communications leaving or entering the UK.

However many legal experts have questioned the validity of this extra-territorial effect, not least because the legislation could require companies to breach their own nation’s laws in complying with a UK warrant – a warrant whose existence they could not reveal without breaking UK law.

A recent Telegraph report quoted an anonymous security official complaining that these companies would not assist GCHQ enquires by passing on evidence about serious criminals unless there was an imminent threat of harm.

What can be done about it?

1) Get heavy with the tech companies

Media reports have suggested Whatsapp, Snapcat and Apple’s iMessage, which offer an encrypted instant messaging services could be banned from the UK.

Companies that offer encrypted email services could also be banned or required to hand over their encryption “keys”, either to the security services or to network operators.

Operators could then be required by law to decrypt the data.

As Privacy International points out, proposals to outlaw encrypted communications “not only threaten the very rights they’re said to be designed to protect, but begin from a fundamentally flawed premise – that such measures are even possible.”

It added: “The UK simply can not command foreign manufacturers and providers of services such as Whatsapp to modify their services to accommodate the desires of British spies.”

Any attempted move in this direction would antagonise some very powerful opponents – Google, for example, which recently proposed that websites that do not encrypt their traffic be marked as “insecure” by default.

The company is a major advocate for “end-to-end encryption“, which encrypts data leaving a user’s browser until it is decrypted by the recipient. The tech giant has previously publicly announced support for anti-surveillance campaigners.

In 2010 the Indian government threatened to ban Blackberry for refusing to allow the country’s security officials access to its messages. The dispute ran for several years before ending in a compromise, with the company agreeing to allow more limited access – to meta-data – than had originally been requested.

A battle between the UK and Google or Apple would be a different matter altogether.

2) Revival of the “Snoopers’ Charter”

The Conservatives are pushing for a revival of the Communications Data draft Bill, known as the “Snoopers’ Charter”, which was abandoned in 2013 after opposition from the Liberal Democrats.

This would have required all internet service providers to retain, for 12 months, in a common format data on their customers’ communications via the internet as well as via the mobile networks.

Data stored would include visits to websites and social media activities.

These databases could then be searched by a Government data-mining device called a “request filter”.

As well as major concerns about the threat to privacy this would entail, it is questionable whether the national security benefits would justify the expense of building and maintaining the data storage centers necessary to retain this huge amount of information, particularly if the encryption problem has not been solved.

Companies that have no commercial imperative to collect the information would have to be compensated if they were compelled to do so. The bill could run into hundreds of millions of pounds given the volume and complexity of data involved.

3) Hack!

The third prong in the intelligence agencies’ communications surveillance trident is its ability to break encryption by hacking.

GCHQ’s capabilities in this and any other regard are never discussed officially as a matter of policy.

But without understanding this capability – and how, if at all, it is constrained by the law – it is difficult to know just how hampered the security services are.

Documents leaked in 2013 by National Security Agency (NSA)  whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed that US and UK intelligence agencies have been pouring their efforts into cracking encryption codes for many years.

A Guardian report that year quoted a 2010 NSA presentation as stating that “for the past decade, NSA has led an aggressive, multipronged effort to break widely used internet encryption technologies.”

A more recent report in German newspaper Der Spiegel based on a set of Snowden files dated 2012 showed that the NSA considered monitoring Facebook chat “a minor task”. On the other hand a protocol called Off-the-Record (OTR) for encrypting instant messaging seemed to be causing the NSA major problems.

Facebook has improved its security since 2012 but it’s likely that intelligence agencies’ hacking powers have improved in tandem.

GCHQ hacking may also explain why the government wants companies to store data that is currently unreadable due to encryption.

As yet another Snowden file says: “Vast amounts of encrypted Internet data which have up till now been discarded are now exploitable.”

Once an encrypted system has been hacked into, intelligence agencies can re-examine stored data to find information that was previously hidden – a powerful motive for retaining data.

The Snowden documents also revealed that NSA and its “Five Eyes” partners including the UK had adopted covert measures to ensure control over setting of international encryption standards, the use of supercomputers to break encryption with “brute force”.

Through covert partnerships with internet service providers and tech companies, the agencies had also inserted secret vulnerabilities known as backdoors into commercial encryption software.

“These design changes make the systems in question exploitable … to the consumer and other adversaries, however, the systems’ security remains intact,” one document says.

Since this was made public, the companies concerned may have become less willing to enter into these collaborations.

Related story: Thatcher and Blair Cabinet Secretary: Intelligence committee has “helped” public by confirming GCHQ’s internet tap “Tempora” powers

sourcehttps://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2015-01-13/a-guide-to-state-surveillance-the-snoopers-charter-and-government-hacking

Related:

  • UNDERCOVER POLICING ATROCITIES:

ANDY COLES – #sackandycoles #spycops + JANET ALDER + UNDERCOVER COPS: “The Women Activists Who Fell In Love With Police Spies And Are Still Waiting For Justice” VIDEO

BUTLINCAT’S BLOG: The SNOOPER’S CHARTER bill is being rushed …

——————————————————————————————————————
FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107
NB: DISCLAIMER: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

#Unity4J Online Vigil in support of Julian Assange + Assange mother: “I’m terrified of what US will do to Julian” – RT 2 Sept. 2018

#Unity4J Online Vigil in support of Julian Assange 4.0

#Unity4J

Started streaming 11 hours ago [1 Sept. 2018]
Multistreaming with https://restream.io/ Join Joe Lauria, Editor in Chief of Consortium News, for a chain of interviews with Julian Assange’s supporters and friends. #Unity4J originated from an unplanned but timely response to injustice when Julian Assange’s internet access and visitation rights were abruptly taken away and swiftly grew into a series of high-profile monthly online vigils featuring Chris Hedges, George Galloway, Ray McGovern, Bill Binney and Daniel Ellsberg among many other noteworthy figures. International media are reporting that WikiLeaks Editor-in-Chief may imminently be handed by Ecuador to UK authorities. (Ref: https://disobedientmedia.com/2018/07/… over-of-julian-assange-to-the-uk-may-be-imminent/) If such an event occurs, it presents an immediate threat to Assange’s human rights, asylum rights, liberty and to press freedoms. It would also be in direct contravention to the rulings of the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention and the Inter-American Court of human rights, both of which have found in his favour. “Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence and thereby eventually lose all ability to defend ourselves and those we love.” -Julian Assange Spread the word: Livestream also accessible at: http://unity4j.com/stream Event hashtag: #Unity4J Official website: http://unity4j.com/ Official Twitter: https://twitter.com/@Unity4J WikiLeaks Legal Defence Fund: https://justice4assange.com/donate.html WikiLeaks support website: https://iamwikileaks.org Courage Foundation: https://couragefound.org/ Live-tweets and/or additional content: @Unity4J @Suzi3D @ElizabethLeaVos @CassandraRules @KimDotcom @InternetPartyNZ @greekemmy @couragefound @BellaMagnani @primal_species @CrowdVBank MEDIA INQUIRIES: Media inquiries and interview requests should be made to Suzie Dawson, via DM on Twitter: @Suzi3D, or Elizabeth Vos on Twitter via @Elizabethleavos, or by emailing info@unity4j.com

[1st interview in above video] William Binney (intelligence official)

.

AnonScan #CoditionRed video revealed #NoExpulsion #Unity4J

Published on 21 Jul 2018

Assange mother: I’m terrified of what US will do to Julian

RT

Published on 2 Aug 2012

While Julian Assange is awaiting Ecuador’s decision on his appeal for political asylum, his mother Christine has traveled to the country to discuss her son’s fate with President Rafael Correa. She spoke about the ongoing case with RT Spanish. RT LIVE http://rt.com/on-air Subscribe to RT! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c… Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTnews Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_com Follow us on Google+ http://plus.google.com/b/102728491539… RT (Russia Today) is a global news network broadcasting from Moscow and Washington studios. RT is the first news channel to break the 500 million YouTube views benchmark.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Maurice Kirk: hunger strike continues but progress is being made, thanks to Mr. Cairns? One hopes… 31 Aug. 2018 + archive

Received thankfully the 2 notes received are much more heartening than those received on the 24 August [post below], stating amongst other things that an endoscopy / colonoscopy investigation has been promised, but M states he is staying on hunger strike until things are confirmed properly. Also he states he is off any “medications in possession” restriction [the restriction being where a convict is barred from being allowed to have medications given to him by the prison kept in his cell or on his person [in case his cell is burgled by another con]] – the medication to be taken as and when needed, eg. directly before food in MK’s case, which is all well and fine that MK is on no such restriction IF they dispense the medications to him in the first place – which they aren’t, hence his remaining on “hunger strike” as a result of this appalling [and illegal] misuse of the prison system, along with other irregularities. See the Ministry of Justice letters at the foot of this page where the MoJ have the audacity to declare that prisoners, as NHS patients or clients “get the best possible NHS treatment” whilst in HMP, when the truth sadly shows that they most definitely don’t, as this sentence alone proves, for instance, along with the other 7 years-worth of sentences served since 2009 which are also testimony to profound irregularities regarding medical treatment not forthcoming that no one does anything about, as they should, at the time or after.

Other positive progress is contained within the notes [if one can find and read them, but I’m sure they’re there] and perhaps thanks are to be credited to the Welsh Secretary Mr. Alun Cairns, Maurice’s former MP who has known Maurice for many years, who [maybe] acted upon certain criticisms aimed his way recently because of the absolute break down of not only Maurice’s basic human rights to receive proper medical treatment whilst in HMP Parc, but also in other departments where travesties are / were taking place for so long eg. hospital visits ignored when Maurice most needed them. So, we’re not out of the woods by a long chalk, but if any progress has been made that Maurice speaks of a big “thank you” to Mr. Cairns is surely in order, and I for one apologise for my venomous tone in recent communications, brought about by the utter frustration of little changing for now 8 and a half months since M’s entry into HMP Parc where even the simplest of medical treatment has been denied 95% of the time by these G4S prison staff. I mean, would anyone in their right mind let any animal suffer as Maurice has for over 8 months? Having said that, Maurice states he’s “bed bound” because of his present medical situation, so let’s hope that rare praise for Mr. Cairns isn’t misplaced and Maurice continues to find himself in a better and more acceptable position, which, let’s face it, should’ve been happening from Day One, let us not forget, and let us not forget also that Maurice shouldn’t even be where he is if the law had been dispensed properly, Her Honour Judge Tracy Lloyd Clarke, because “having knowledge of a restraining order” [which I heard said with my own ears at a hearing directly before Maurice’s sentencing hearing] is very different to a restraining order being served on someone properly and according to the law, which the original order most definately wasn’t – the same as this very same order couldn’t be shown to a jury who asked to see it many moons ago. Something is very wrong somewhere…

The 2 notes:

2:

Archive: Maurice is serving a highly questionable 2 year sentence, beginning on 14/12/2017 in HMP Parc, Bridgend, Wales – the archive of posts here with MK’s updates from HMP Parc:

 https://butlincat.com/?s=maurice+kirk

Maurice’s site is http://www.mauricejohnkirk.com

his email address is: maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Maurice Kirk: back on hunger strike in HMP Parc – medication and medical treatment still denied since December 2017 – 21 Aug. 2018 + archive

Received:  Maurice, 73, states he is again on hunger strike because of the denial of the prison staff to dispense him the medication he has every right to receive – for months now. Note phone calls to family members along with calls to supporters are also denied for Maurice, as well as urgent hospital appointments for debilitating stomach ailments. The relevant medical records the hospital staff need to see regarding any medical procedure urgently needed can be undertaken are also denied – a blatant abuse of MK’s human rights and a public scandal!  Note MK also writes: “I CAN NO LONGER SEND AS TO WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON” – with threats of violence towards him by morons serving sentences in this place  one can hardly imagine the dire situation MK is in now, with no authority caring one jot what happens to MK or what goes on in this private gulag of a prison. His supposed release date of 1 August is now apparently abandoned due to a prison system completely out of control. Someone must surely answer for this outrageously unacceptable situation…

1]  note re: being on hunger strike

2]  Prisoner’s formal complaint  27 July 2018

3]  letter to Cardiff C Court 14 Aug 2018

4]  note “I CAN NO LONGER SEND AS TO WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON”

5]  G4S letter re: “number of complaints”

6] 2nd G4S letter:  the return of  complaints

 

1]  note re: being on hunger strike

2]  Prisoner’s formal complaint  27 July 2018

3]  letter to Cardiff C Court 14 Aug 2018

4]  note:  “I CAN NO LONGER SEND AS TO WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON

5]  G4S letter re: “number of complaints”

6] 2nd G4S letter:  the return of  complaints

 

Archive: Maurice is serving a highly questionable 2 year sentence, beginning on 14/12/2017 in HMP Parc, Bridgend, Wales – the archive of posts here with MK’s updates from HMP Parc:

 https://butlincat.com/?s=maurice+kirk

Maurice’s site is http://www.mauricejohnkirk.com

his email address is: maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

These letters below, from the MoJ in 2013, with statements completely contradicting what actually goes on in these “prisons”. Maurice, now 73, has been denied medical treatment, including treatment for a probable broken ankle, a tooth abscess and also “Barrett’s Syndrome” for months now – his medication being denied for most of the 6 months he’s been in HMP Parc: 

above:  16 Oct. 2016, arrested for driving irregularities transporting a plane from A to B [the plane wasn’t secured well enough or something] – nothing transpired after…

FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

NB: DISCLAIMER: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 3 Comments

ALEX SALMOND RESIGNS + ROBERT GREEN CALL 24 Aug. 2018 + Alex Salmond reported to cops over allegations of sexual assault – Daily Record

Ex-SNP leader Alex Salmond resigns from party

  • 29 August 2018
Alex SalmondImage copyrightPA
Former SNP leader Alex Salmond has resigned from the party amid allegations of sexual misconduct.
In a statement he said he wanted to avoid internal division within the SNP, which has faced calls to suspend him.
He has denied any wrongdoing, and said he intended to apply to rejoin once he had an opportunity to clear his name.
It emerged last week that two Scottish government staff members had lodged complaints in January about his behaviour when he was first minister.
Mr Salmond has described the allegations as “patently ridiculous” – and has also criticised the complaints procedure which he claims is “unjust”.
On Tuesday he formally began legal action against the Scottish government in the Court of Session over its handling of the misconduct allegations.
In a statement released on social media, Mr Salmond said he had been a member of the SNP for 45 years, 20 of them as party leader and seven as first minister.
He continued: “I truly love the SNP and the wider independence movement in Scotland. They have been the defining commitment of my life. But today I have written to the National Secretary of the party resigning my membership.”
Nicola Sturgeon and Alex SalmondImage copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image captionMs Sturgeon said Alex Salmond had been her “friend and mentor” for nearly 30 years
Mr Salmond indicated that his resignation was to avoid potential divisions within the party, as his successor Nicola Sturgeon faced opposition calls to suspend his SNP membership.
He stated: “I did not come into politics to facilitate opposition attacks on the SNP and, with Parliament returning next week, I have tendered my resignation to remove this line of opposition attack.
“Most of all, I am conscious that if the party felt forced into suspending me it would cause substantial internal division.”
The current SNP leader and first minister, Nicola Sturgeon, said she “felt a huge sadness about the whole situation”.
In a statement on Twitter, she said the decision was Alex Salmond’s alone, and she understood why he had chosen to separate “the current questions he is facing from the day to day business of the SNP and the ongoing campaign for independence”.
She continued: “The hard fact remains that two complaints were received by the Scottish government that could not be ignored or swept under the carpet.”
The Daily Record newspaper broke the news of the sexual misconduct allegations last Thursday.
The paper claims to have seen the wording of one complaint which describes an incident alleged to have taken place at the first minister’s official residence in Edinburgh, Bute House, in the first week of December 2013.
The two women lodged complaints in January this year, just weeks after the Scottish government adopted a new complaints procedure in the light of wider concern about sexual harassment at Holyrood and Westminster.
Alex SalmondImage copyrightPA
Image captionMr Salmond has hosted a show on the controversial RT station since last November
Mr Salmond claims that the subsequent investigation into the allegations against him by senior Scottish government civil servants was “unfair and unjust”.
He said he had been given no opportunity to “see and therefore to properly challenge the case against me” and that he had “not been allowed to see the evidence”.
Mr Salmond has also claimed that someone within the Scottish government has “flagrantly and repeatedly” breached the confidential complaints process by leaking details to the Daily Record.
He is now seeking a judicial review of the new complaints procedure and has launched a crowdfunding appeal to fund his legal action.

Alex Salmond

  • Leader of Scottish National Party 1990-2000 and 2004-2014
  • First Minister of Scotland 2007 – 2014
  • Stood down after Scotland voted to remain in the United Kingdom

The Scottish government has insisted the complaints process has been “entirely confidential throughout” and has said it will defend its position vigorously in the courts.
The complaints against Mr Salmond have also been passed to Police Scotland which has said it is assessing the information.
Mr Salmond was Scottish first minister and SNP leader until September 2014 when he resigned following the “No” vote in the Scottish independence referendum.
He returned to frontline politics when he was elected as the SNP MP for Gordon in 2015 and became the party’s foreign affairs spokesman at Westminster before losing the seat in the snap general election two years later.
Since then he has faced heavy criticism for hosting the Alex Salmond Show on Russian broadcaster RT, which has been described as a propaganda channel for the Kremlin – a claim Mr Salmond has denied.

Robert Green call – 24 August 2018

butlin cat

Published on 24 Aug 2018

Robert Green, major supporter in the notorious Hollie Greig case and coverup, regarding which he was unfairly jailed and has suffered other nefarious persecutions, speaks regarding important matters 24 Aug. 2018.

Alex Salmond reported to cops over allegations of sexual assault

The former first minister has denied the allegations and launched legal proceedings.
Alex Salmond has been reported to police over allegations he sexually assaulted two staff members whilst First Minister.
The former SNP leader has been accused of carrying out the attacks in the First Minister’s official Edinburgh residence in December 2013.
The allegations – which will send reverberations through the political world – were passed to the police by Scottish Government officials after an internal probe.
The Scottish Government tonight said they could not comment on the allegations.
A spokeswoman said: “For legal reasons, we are currently unable to comment.”
A Police Scotland spokesman added: “Police Scotland is not going to comment on whether an inquiry is ongoing.”
Salmond issued a denial of the allegations last night and revealed he has been engaged in legal action against the Government.
He said: “For many months now, and on the advice of Senior Counsel, I have attempted to persuade the Permanent Secretary to the Scottish Government that she is behaving unlawfully in the application of a complaints procedure, introduced by her more than three years after I left office.
“This is a procedure so unjust that even now I have not been allowed to see and therefore to properly challenge the case against me. I have not been allowed to see the evidence.
“I have tried everything, including offers of conciliation, mediation and legal arbitration to resolve these matters both properly and amicably.”This would have been in everybody’s interests, particularly those of the two complainants. All of these efforts have been rejected.
“The Permanent Secretary chose to deny me contact with any current civil servant, many of whom wished to give evidence on my behalf and access to documentation to allow me to properly challenge the complaints, all of which I refute and some of which were patently ridiculous.
“The procedure as put into operation by the Permanent Secretary is grossly unfair and therefore inevitably will lead to prejudicial outcomes.
“It is therefore with great reluctance that I have today launched a Judicial Review in the Court of Session which will decide the issue of the lawfulness of the procedure which has been used against me.
“If I lose then I will have to answer to the complaints both comprehensively and publicly.
“Until then I am bound to say nothing which would impinge on the Court proceedings.
“In our submissions on Judicial Review we have asked that the complainants’ identity be protected.
“If the Court of Session finds in my favour then the administration at the senior levels of the Scottish Government will have the most serious questions to answer.
“In my opinion and for whatever reason the Permanent Secretary has decided to mount a process against me using an unlawful procedure which she herself introduced.
“I will let a real court decide whether it was lawful for her to do so.”

Bute House, an A-listed Bute House in Edinburgh’s Charlotte Square is owned by the National Trust for Scotland and is the equivalent of 10 Downing Street for Scotland’s First Minister.

It hosts cabinet meetings and other official business as well as late night functions for entertaining guests and other dignitaries.The Georgian property also has living quarters for the use of the First Minister when in Edinburgh.
Salmond resigned as First Minister in the wake of defeat in the independence referendum in September 2014 and was replaced by Nicola Sturgeon.
He had served in the role since the SNP’s first Holyrood election victory in May 2007.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Who supplied the arms that killed the children in Yemen? + “STOP THIS BRITISH BANK FUNDING THE ARMING OF ISRAEL” – PETITION

 

Stop Supplying Arms to Countries Committing War Crimes

You might have seen it in your newsfeed — devastating reports of a Saudi Arabia-led Coalition airstrike in Yemen that hit a bus carrying children from a summer camp. Media reports state that a nearby hospital received 29 bodies of mainly children.


What you may not know is that the United States is supplying weapons to both Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates — two countries committing war crimes in Yemen — and this year the Trump administration is finalizing a $12.5 billion weapon deal with Saudi Arabia.

Tell your Member of Congress to immediately stop the flow of arms to members of the Saudi Arabia-led Coalition for use in Yemen.

We don’t hear about it much, but Yemen is enduring one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises. This month’s tragedy is the latest in a string of Coalition airstrikes which have indiscriminately killed civilians and targeted infrastructure like hospitals and markets.

Countries like Germany, Norway and Belgium have already cut off arms supplies to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates because of their human rights violations in Yemen. It’s time for the United States of America to do the same. Supplying arms that are being used to kill civilians, including children, is simply indefensible.

Please, take a moment now to tell your Member of Congress to stop supplying military exports to the Saudi Arabia-led Coalition, before more civilians are injured and killed.

It’s been called the “forgotten war”, but it’s time for Americans everywhere to pay attention. Together, we can influence our government to not only stop arming Saudi-led Coalition forces, but also to use its power as an ally and call for full compliance with international humanitarian law.


Margaret Huang

Executive Director
Amnesty International USA

 

US Military to Train Saudi Pilots on American Soil Despite Outrage Over Yemen “War Crimes”

There are numerous indications besides the federal procurement request that Mattis’ statements of caution to the Saudis were merely public theater aimed at reducing outrage over one of the Saudi-led coalition’s latest atrocities.

https://www.mintpressnews.com/us-military-to-train-saudi-pilots-on-american-soil-despite-outrage-over-war-crimes-in-yemen/248592/

 

STOP THIS BRITISH BANK FUNDING THE ARMING OF ISRAEL – PETITION “War on Want”

HSBC: divest from Elbit and other companies arming Israel

Israel uses military force to maintain its oppression of Palestinians. It targets people with tear gas grenades, rubber-coated bullets and live ammunition, and carries out mass arrests, house demolitions and extrajudicial executions. 
This brutality lies at the heart of Israel’s systematic violations of Palestinian rights, amounting to serious breaches of international law, and even war crimes.
HSBC is a major shareholder in companies selling weapons and military technology to Israel including Elbit Systems, which manufactures drones and surveillance technology, and has recently sold Israel cannons for internationally banned cluster munitions. HSBC claims to have a strict policy against doing business with companies involved in cluster munitions production, but as of 2017, it held £3.6 million worth of shares in Elbit Systems.
We can’t allow banks on our high streets to continue lending support to Israel’s militarised repression of Palestinians. Together, we can break the chain of complicity.
Tell HSBC to divest from Elbit and all other companies selling weapons used in violence and human rights abuse.

Elbit Systems is one of Israel’s largest arms companies, and the Israeli military is one of its main clients. Elbit bosses boast that its weapons are ‘battle-tested’ and ‘combat-proven’, meaning that they have been used again Palestinians.

Elbit is or has been involved in the production of:

  • Drones

  • Surveillance equipment

  • Cannons for cluster munitions

  • White phosphorous

Aside from its Israeli headquarters, Elbit Systems also has seven subsidiary factories in the UK, many of which have been the regular targets of protests and pickets by anti-arms, human rights and peace campaigners. Elbit has also received large UK MoD contracts, and is encouraged to sell its wares at UK government sponsored arms fairs.

Our campaign to get HSBC to divest from Elbit is a part of our larger Stop Arming Israel campaign, calling for the UK government to implement a two-way arms embargo on Israel. For more on the campaign, see: https://waronwant.org/stop-arming-israel

.

see more:

.

War on Want: the worldwide movement for global justice: 

UK bank complicity in Israel’s crimes against the Palestinian people

https://waronwant.org/sites/default/files/Final%20Web%20version%20Deadly%20Investments.pdf

————————————————-

VIOLENCE WARNING: video:

army beating Palestinians

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Legal bloggers allowed to report on family proceedings – The Law Society Gazette

Legal bloggers allowed to report on family proceedings 

Five years after former family division president Sir James Munby highlighted a pressing need for greater transparency in the family justice system, the government and judiciary are to allow certain ‘legal bloggers’ to report on proceedings, the Gazette has learned.

From October, lawyers who hold a valid practising certificate, or work for a higher education institution or educational charity, will be able to attend family proceedings in the family court and family division of the High Court with a view to reporting the proceedings as part of a nine-month pilot scheme being led by the Ministry of Justice and the judiciary.

Bloggers will be required to provide evidence of their eligibility in the pilot and photo ID on the day of the hearing. Court staff will check the evidence and notify the court of the blogger’s attendance. The judge may also request to see the evidence in court. Educational charities must receive authorisation from the family division president for their lawyers to attend proceedings for the purposes of reporting on them.

The Transparency Project, a charity which aims to make family law and family courts clearer, has long campaigned for bloggers to be permitted into family court hearings, and said it was pleased its proposal will be piloted.

The charity told the Gazette: ‘We think that this pilot scheme has potential to help make clearer how family courts work, and to tell the public about the sorts of decisions family courts are making every day up and down the country, rather than just those cases involving a celebrity, a scandal or titillating fact. Although this pilot does not in any way diminish the privacy protections given to children and families under family court rules, we think that there will be some material that can legitimately be reported and that will help the public to get a better understanding of what goes on in private hearings.’

The charity stressed that journalists’ role in holding the justice system to account remains crucial. However, it believes lawyers ‘can provide a greater technical understanding and a different perspective, and can select what to write about without being constrained by the commercial considerations that drive the highly selective reporting of family justice by the mainstream media’.

The pilot, which comes into force on 1 October, will end in June 2019.

A spokesperson for the ministry said: ‘It is vital that justice is seen to be done, which is why we’re committed to increasing transparency across our courts. Pilots such as this will improve understanding of our courts and family justice system, while maintaining vital privacy safeguards for vulnerable adults and children involved in cases.’

sourcehttps://www.lawgazette.co.uk/law/legal-bloggers-allowed-to-report-on-family-proceedings/5067304.article#.W4G3eGmyE60.linkedin

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Maurice Kirk: Letter to Prince Charles + more 24 Aug. 2018 + archive

Received:

1]  Letter to Prince Charles, 2009

2]  Letter from HM Chief Insp. of Prisons 03 Aug. 2018

3]  note

 

1]  Letter to Prince Charles, 2009

2]  Letter from HM Chief Insp. of Prisons 03 Aug. 2018

3]  note

ArchiveMaurice is serving a highly questionable 2 year sentence, beginning on 14/12/2017 in HMP Parc, Bridgend, Wales – the archive of posts here with MK’s updates from HMP Parc:

 https://butlincat.com/?s=maurice+kirk

Maurice’s site is http://www.mauricejohnkirk.com

his email address is: maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Maurice Kirk: back on hunger strike in HMP Parc – medication and medical treatment still denied since December 2017 – 21 Aug. 2018 + archive

Received:  Maurice, 73, states he is again on hunger strike because of the denial of the prison staff to dispense him the medication he has every right to receive – for months now. Note phone calls to family members along with calls to supporters are also denied for Maurice, as well as urgent hospital appointments for debilitating stomach ailments. The relevant medical records the hospital staff need to see regarding any medical procedure urgently needed can be undertaken are also denied – a blatant abuse of MK’s human rights and a public scandal!  Note MK also writes: “I CAN NO LONGER SEND AS TO WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON” – with threats of violence towards him by morons serving sentences in this place  one can hardly imagine the dire situation MK is in now, with no authority caring one jot what happens to MK or what goes on in this private gulag of a prison. His supposed release date of 1 August is now apparently abandoned due to a prison system completely out of control. Someone must surely answer for this outrageously unacceptable situation…

1]  note re: being on hunger strike

2]  Prisoner’s formal complaint  27 July 2018

3]  letter to Cardiff C Court 14 Aug 2018

4]  note “I CAN NO LONGER SEND AS TO WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON”

5]  G4S letter re: “number of complaints”

6] 2nd G4S letter:  the return of  complaints

 

1]  note re: being on hunger strike

2]  Prisoner’s formal complaint  27 July 2018

3]  letter to Cardiff C Court 14 Aug 2018

4]  note:  “I CAN NO LONGER SEND AS TO WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON

5]  G4S letter re: “number of complaints”

6] 2nd G4S letter:  the return of  complaints

 

Archive: Maurice is serving a highly questionable 2 year sentence, beginning on 14/12/2017 in HMP Parc, Bridgend, Wales – the archive of posts here with MK’s updates from HMP Parc:

 https://butlincat.com/?s=maurice+kirk

Maurice’s site is http://www.mauricejohnkirk.com

his email address is: maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

These letters below, from the MoJ in 2013, with statements completely contradicting what actually goes on in these “prisons”. Maurice, now 73, has been denied medical treatment, including treatment for a probable broken ankle, a tooth abscess and also “Barrett’s Syndrome” for months now – his medication being denied for most of the 6 months he’s been in HMP Parc: 

above:  16 Oct. 2016, arrested for driving irregularities transporting a plane from A to B [the plane wasn’t secured well enough or something] – nothing transpired after…

FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

NB: DISCLAIMER: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 2 Comments
%d bloggers like this: